{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5154","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5154,"authors_free":[{"id":5935,"entry_id":5154,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1682,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Federico Minzoni","free_first_name":"Federico","free_last_name":"Minzoni","norm_person":{"id":1682,"first_name":"Federico","last_name":"Minzoni","full_name":"Federico Minzoni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Federico Minzoni"}}],"entry_title":"Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino"},"abstract":"A widespread historiographic commonplace, established by Thomas Aquinas himself in his Tractatus de unitate intellectus (1270), takes Siger of Brabant\u2019s Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1265) to be a latin formulation of Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s theory of the unity of the material intellect as exposed in the Tafs\u012br Kit\u0101b al-Nafs (Long Commentary on the De anima, ca. 1186); according to the same view, Aquinas\u2019 philosophy of mind would be the expression of a strongly antiaverroistic \u2013 and therefore more orthodox \u2013 kind of aristotelianism. Building on a thorough analysis of key texts in Aquinas\u2019 Commentary on the Sentences (1255), I argue in this paper that those who hold Aquinas\u2019 noetic to be anti-averroistic are greatly mistaken: while Siger\u2019s always superficial rushdian inspiration is better understood against the background of a neoplatonic-tinged mind-body dualism clearly at odds with Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s own strictly peripatetic ontology, Aquinas\u2019 psychology, hylomorfic and not-dualist at its core, is aristotelian mainly inasmuch as it is rushdian. ","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1682,"full_name":"Federico Minzoni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5154,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dianoia","volume":"24","issue":"","pages":"15-32"}},"sort":[2017]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5142","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5142,"authors_free":[{"id":5921,"entry_id":5142,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":755,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Massimo Campanini","free_first_name":"Massimiliano","free_last_name":"Campanini","norm_person":{"id":755,"first_name":"Massimo","last_name":"Campanini","full_name":"Massimo Campanini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1116088959","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/36958023","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Massimo Campanini"}}],"entry_title":"Ontology of intellect. The happiness of thinking in Averro\u00ebs and Giordano Bruno","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ontology of intellect. The happiness of thinking in Averro\u00ebs and Giordano Bruno"},"abstract":"In this paper the author reflects comparatively on a specific issue dealt with by Giordano Bruno and Ibn Rushd: mental happiness. Mental happiness is intended here either as felicity through thinking or as felicity of thinking. The philosophical link between Averro\u00ebs and Giordano Bruno is by now soundly established and the paper is rather a theoretical than an historical analysis regarding Bruno\u2019s \u201cAverroism\u201d.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21464\/sp31207","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":755,"full_name":"Massimo Campanini","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5142,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Synthesis Philosophica","volume":"62","issue":"2","pages":"335\u2013344"}},"sort":[2016]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5239","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5239,"authors_free":[{"id":6048,"entry_id":5239,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles Ehret","free_first_name":"Charles","free_last_name":"Ehret","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Informing from Without: Intellect as Separate Form according to Averroes & Thomas Wylton","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Informing from Without: Intellect as Separate Form according to Averroes & Thomas Wylton"},"abstract":"Review article of \"Les possibilit\u00e9s de jonction: Averro\u00e8s - Thomas Wylton\" (2013) by Jean-Baptiste Brenet","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5239,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"62","issue":"2","pages":"389\u2013406"}},"sort":[2015]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5579","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5579,"authors_free":[{"id":6476,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Ghorbani","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Ghorbani","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6477,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fath ali Akbari","free_first_name":"Fath ali ","free_last_name":"Akbari","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"},"abstract":"In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Persian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5579,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"5","issue":"12","pages":"69-84"}},"sort":[2015]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1763","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1763,"authors_free":[{"id":2034,"entry_id":1763,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1497,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francisco Bertelloni","free_first_name":"Francisco","free_last_name":"Bertelloni","norm_person":{"id":1497,"first_name":"Francisco","last_name":"Bertelloni","full_name":"Francisco Bertelloni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1032879955","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/224436893","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francisco Bertelloni"}}],"entry_title":"La filosof\u00eda explica la revelaci\u00f3n sobre el \u201cAverroismo politico\u201d en el Defensor pacis de Marsilio de Padua","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La filosof\u00eda explica la revelaci\u00f3n sobre el \u201cAverroismo politico\u201d en el Defensor pacis de Marsilio de Padua"},"abstract":"Bruno Nardi fue el primero que tipific\u00f3 el pensamiento de Marsilio de Padua como \u201caverroismo pol\u00edtico\u201d. Sin embargo la edad media no tuvo acceso a la filosof\u00eda pol\u00edtica de Averroes. Por ello es improbable que Nardi haya fundamentado la utilizaci\u00f3n de esa categor\u00eda teniendo en cuenta las ideas pol\u00edticas de Averroes y de Marsilio. El art\u00edculo muestra que, en todo caso, Marsilio podr\u00eda ser llamado \u201caverroista pol\u00edtico\u201d teniendo en cuenta, no su pensamiento pol\u00edtico, sino sus ideas filos\u00f3ficas y, en especial, las actitudes metodol\u00f3gicas referidas a la relaci\u00f3n Fe-Raz\u00f3n que manifiesta en su Defensor Pacis. A partir de Nardi el \u201caverroismo pol\u00edtico\u201d se transform\u00f3 en una categor\u00eda controvertida que condujo a una pol\u00e9mica acerca de la existencia o no de una corriente similar en el pensamiento pol\u00edtico medieval. De hecho, en numerosos pasajes del Defensor pacis aparece la distinci\u00f3n Fe-raz\u00f3n utilizada en favor de un predominio de una actitud metodol\u00f3gica racionalista. Con todo, el racionalismo de Marsilio es fluctuante. Por ejemplo, cuando explica el nacimiento de la civitas, en lugar de demostrarlo a partir del concepto filos\u00f3fico de natura, atribuye ese nacimiento al pecado original. Ese uso de la historia de la salvaci\u00f3n y de la teolog\u00eda parece poner en duda el racionalismo extremo de Marsilio. El art\u00edculo propone responder tres preguntas: a) si Marsilio pone l\u00edmites a la revelaci\u00f3n en el Defensor Pacis; b) cu\u00e1l es el alcance de ese l\u00edmite; c) si ese l\u00edmite que Marsilio pone a la Revelaci\u00f3n puede ser considerado como una influencia averroista sobre el paduano.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"Portuguese","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":1497,"full_name":"Francisco Bertelloni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1763,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Educ\u00e3o e Filosofia Uberl\u00e2ndia","volume":"25","issue":"50","pages":"475\u2013500"}},"sort":[2011]}