| Title | Les stades de la philosophie naturelle d'Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 1997 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 7 |
| Pages | 115–137 |
| Categories | Biography, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius, Ibn Bāǧǧa |
| Author(s) | Josep Puig Montada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The stages in the development of Averroes' philosophy can be better defined by the revisions Averroes himself made of his works than by the traditional order of his commentaries (short, middle, long); such revisions often take the form of glosses. In his initial stages Averroes' opinions are influenced by the interpretations of Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius as well as Avempace. In his final stages, he departs from them and moves closer to Aristotle's original thought. Averroes' reading of the beginning of Physics, Book VIII is an exception: there he agrees with Aristotle in the first stage and moves away from him in the final stage, because he came to believe that Aristotle's purpose in this part of the book was to prove the eternity of heavenly movement. The explanation for the different reading of the introduction to the short commentary can be found in the persecution Averroes and other philosophers suffered in 1197, after which Averroes no longer declared philosophy to be the way to attain human perfection, and he only wanted to illuminate Aristotle's philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"410","_score":null,"_source":{"id":410,"authors_free":[{"id":552,"entry_id":410,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Les stades de la philosophie naturelle d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Les stades de la philosophie naturelle d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"The stages in the development of Averroes' philosophy can be better defined by the revisions Averroes himself made of his works than by the traditional order of his commentaries (short, middle, long); such revisions often take the form of glosses. In his initial stages Averroes' opinions are influenced by the interpretations of Alexander of Aphrodisias and Themistius as well as Avempace. In his final stages, he departs from them and moves closer to Aristotle's original thought. Averroes' reading of the beginning of Physics, Book VIII is an exception: there he agrees with Aristotle in the first stage and moves away from him in the final stage, because he came to believe that Aristotle's purpose in this part of the book was to prove the eternity of heavenly movement. The explanation for the different reading of the introduction to the short commentary can be found in the persecution Averroes and other philosophers suffered in 1197, after which Averroes no longer declared philosophy to be the way to attain human perfection, and he only wanted to illuminate Aristotle's philosophy.","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":13,"category_name":"Biography","link":"bib?categories[]=Biography"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"}],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":410,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"7","issue":null,"pages":"115\u2013137"}},"sort":[1997]}
| Title | Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 51–74 |
| Categories | Logic, Alexander of Aphrodisias, al-Fārābī, Aristotle, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rušd devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26–30). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-Fārābī and Alexander, on the basis of al-Fārābī's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-Fārābī's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5–20). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"479","_score":null,"_source":{"id":479,"authors_free":[{"id":623,"entry_id":479,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"},"abstract":"Ibn Ru\u0161d devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26\u201330). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Alexander, on the basis of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5\u201320). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":479,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"51\u201374"}},"sort":[1995]}
| Title | Averroes als Vermittler der Gedanken des Alexander von Aphrodisias |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1994 |
| Published in | Averroismus im Mittelalter und in der Renaissance |
| Pages | 201–221 |
| Categories | Influence, Renaissance, Alexander of Aphrodisias |
| Author(s) | Olaf Pluta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"456","_score":null,"_source":{"id":456,"authors_free":[{"id":599,"entry_id":456,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":666,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Olaf Pluta","free_first_name":"Olaf","free_last_name":"Pluta","norm_person":{"id":666,"first_name":"Olaf","last_name":"Pluta","full_name":"Olaf Pluta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/110951786","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73874170","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd110951786.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Olaf Pluta"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes als Vermittler der Gedanken des Alexander von Aphrodisias","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes als Vermittler der Gedanken des Alexander von Aphrodisias"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"1994","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"}],"authors":[{"id":666,"full_name":"Olaf Pluta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":456,"section_of":4,"pages":"201\u2013221","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":4,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Averroismus im Mittelalter und in der Renaissance","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"1994","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1994","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":4,"pubplace":"Z\u00fcrich","publisher":"Spur Verlag","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1994]}
| Title | Nicoletto Vernia and Agostino Nifo on Alexander of Aphrodisias: an unnoticed dispute |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1968 |
| Journal | Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 268-296 |
| Categories | Agostino Nifo, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Tradition and Reception, Averroism, Renaissance |
| Author(s) | Edward P. Mahoney |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44020582 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5688","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5688,"authors_free":[{"id":6593,"entry_id":5688,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":676,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Edward P. Mahoney","free_first_name":"Edward P. ","free_last_name":"Mahoney","norm_person":{"id":676,"first_name":"Edward P.","last_name":"Mahoney","full_name":"Edward P. Mahoney","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/123905818","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/69847370","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd123905818.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Edward P. Mahoney"}}],"entry_title":"Nicoletto Vernia and Agostino Nifo on Alexander of Aphrodisias: an unnoticed dispute","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Nicoletto Vernia and Agostino Nifo on Alexander of Aphrodisias: an unnoticed dispute"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1968","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44020582","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":59,"category_name":"Agostino Nifo","link":"bib?categories[]=Agostino Nifo"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[{"id":676,"full_name":"Edward P. Mahoney","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5688,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia","volume":"23","issue":"3","pages":"268-296"}},"sort":[1968]}
| Title | Die durch Averroes erhaltenen Fragmente Alexanders zur Metaphysik des Aristoteles. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1884 |
| Publication Place | Berlin |
| Publisher | Verlag der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften |
| Categories | Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Jacob Freudenthal , Siegmund Fränkel |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1949","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1949,"authors_free":[{"id":2383,"entry_id":1949,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":2384,"entry_id":1949,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1570,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jacob Freudenthal","free_first_name":"Jacob","free_last_name":"Freudenthal","norm_person":{"id":1570,"first_name":"Jacob","last_name":"Freudenthal","full_name":"Jacob Freudenthal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/101568355","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54439875","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/sfz17098.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jacob Freudenthal"}},{"id":2385,"entry_id":1949,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1571,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Siegmund Fr\u00e4nkel","free_first_name":"Siegmund","free_last_name":"Fr\u00e4nkel","norm_person":{"id":1571,"first_name":"Siegmund","last_name":"Fr\u00e4nkel","full_name":"Siegmund Fr\u00e4nkel","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/116691832","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27829338","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/sfz16747.html#ndbcontent","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Siegmund Fr\u00e4nkel"}}],"entry_title":"Die durch Averroes erhaltenen Fragmente Alexanders zur Metaphysik des Aristoteles. Abhandlungen der K\u00f6niglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Die durch Averroes erhaltenen Fragmente Alexanders zur Metaphysik des Aristoteles. Abhandlungen der K\u00f6niglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1884","language":"German","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783112505786","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":1570,"full_name":"Jacob Freudenthal","role":2},{"id":1571,"full_name":"Siegmund Fr\u00e4nkel","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1949,"pubplace":"Berlin","publisher":"Verlag der K\u00f6niglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1884]}
| Title | Averroes' Commentary on The "De Intellectu" Attributed to Alexander / פירוש אבן-רשד ל'מאמר בשכל' של אלכסנדר מאפרודיסיאס |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Hebrew |
| Journal | Jerusalem Studies in Jewish Thought |
| Volume | SHLOMO PINES JUBILEE VOLUME : PART I |
| Pages | 205-217 |
| Categories | Alexander of Aphrodisias, Commentary, Psychology, Intellect |
| Author(s) | Herbert A. Davidson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23363790 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5720","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5720,"authors_free":[{"id":6628,"entry_id":5720,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Herbert A. Davidson","free_first_name":"Herbert A. ","free_last_name":"Davidson","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes' Commentary on The \"De Intellectu\" Attributed to Alexander \/ \u05e4\u05d9\u05e8\u05d5\u05e9 \u05d0\u05d1\u05df-\u05e8\u05e9\u05d3 \u05dc'\u05de\u05d0\u05de\u05e8 \u05d1\u05e9\u05db\u05dc' \u05e9\u05dc \u05d0\u05dc\u05db\u05e1\u05e0\u05d3\u05e8 \u05de\u05d0\u05e4\u05e8\u05d5\u05d3\u05d9\u05e1\u05d9\u05d0\u05e1","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes' Commentary on The \"De Intellectu\" Attributed to Alexander \/ \u05e4\u05d9\u05e8\u05d5\u05e9 \u05d0\u05d1\u05df-\u05e8\u05e9\u05d3 \u05dc'\u05de\u05d0\u05de\u05e8 \u05d1\u05e9\u05db\u05dc' \u05e9\u05dc \u05d0\u05dc\u05db\u05e1\u05e0\u05d3\u05e8 \u05de\u05d0\u05e4\u05e8\u05d5\u05d3\u05d9\u05e1\u05d9\u05d0\u05e1"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"","language":"Hebrew","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23363790","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5720,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Jerusalem Studies in Jewish Thought ","volume":"SHLOMO PINES JUBILEE VOLUME : PART I ","issue":"","pages":"205-217"}},"sort":[-9223372036854775808]}
| Title | Nicoletto Vernia and Agostino Nifo on Alexander of Aphrodisias: an unnoticed dispute |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1968 |
| Journal | Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 268-296 |
| Categories | Agostino Nifo, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Tradition and Reception, Averroism, Renaissance |
| Author(s) | Edward P. Mahoney |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44020582 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5688","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5688,"authors_free":[{"id":6593,"entry_id":5688,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":676,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Edward P. Mahoney","free_first_name":"Edward P. ","free_last_name":"Mahoney","norm_person":{"id":676,"first_name":"Edward P.","last_name":"Mahoney","full_name":"Edward P. Mahoney","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/123905818","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/69847370","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd123905818.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Edward P. Mahoney"}}],"entry_title":"Nicoletto Vernia and Agostino Nifo on Alexander of Aphrodisias: an unnoticed dispute","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Nicoletto Vernia and Agostino Nifo on Alexander of Aphrodisias: an unnoticed dispute"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1968","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44020582","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":59,"category_name":"Agostino Nifo","link":"bib?categories[]=Agostino Nifo"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[{"id":676,"full_name":"Edward P. Mahoney","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5688,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista Critica di Storia della Filosofia","volume":"23","issue":"3","pages":"268-296"}},"sort":["Nicoletto Vernia and Agostino Nifo on Alexander of Aphrodisias: an unnoticed dispute"]}
| Title | Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | British Journal for the History of Philosophy |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–66 |
| Categories | Renaissance, De anima, Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius, Thomas |
| Author(s) | John Sellars |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper examines Pomponazzi's arguments against Averroes in his De Immortalitate Animae, focusing on the question whether thought is possible without a body. The first part of the paper will sketch the history of the problem, namely the interpretation of Aristotle's remarks about the intellect in De Anima 3.4-5, touching on Alexander, Themistius, and Averroes. The second part will focus on Pomponazzi's response to Averroes, including his use of arguments by Aquinas. It will conclude by suggesting that Pomponazzi's discussion stands as the first properly modern account of Aristotle's psychology. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5255","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5255,"authors_free":[{"id":6064,"entry_id":5255,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"John Sellars","free_first_name":"John","free_last_name":"Sellars","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect"},"abstract":"This paper examines Pomponazzi's arguments against Averroes in his De Immortalitate Animae, focusing on the question whether thought is possible without a body. The first part of the paper will sketch the history of the problem, namely the interpretation of Aristotle's remarks about the intellect in De Anima 3.4-5, touching on Alexander, Themistius, and Averroes. The second part will focus on Pomponazzi's response to Averroes, including his use of arguments by Aquinas. It will conclude by suggesting that Pomponazzi's discussion stands as the first properly modern account of Aristotle's psychology.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09608788.2015.1063979","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5255,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","volume":"24","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201366"}},"sort":["Pomponazzi Contra Averroes on the Intellect"]}
| Title | Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Publication Place | Sankt Augustin |
| Publisher | Academia Verlag |
| Categories | Alexander of Aphrodisias, Neoplatonism, Plato, Spinoza |
| Author(s) | R. Loredana Cardullo , Francesco Coniglione |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The reason/no-reason conceptual pair (also declinable in the similar forms of rational/a-rational, logical/a-logical) pervades the history of Western thought from the archaic era up to contemporary times. Perceived in different historical periods and in different cultural forms either as a conflict or as a vital coexistence, the reason/no-reason pair was first theorized and legitimated as a sharp contrast in antiquity with the Pythagorean systoichiai, and at the dawn of the twentieth century it was successfully exemplified by Nietzsche through the opposition between Apollonian and Dionysian principles, which denotes respectively the harmonious, orderly, 'bright' side of the human soul, and the chaotic one, wild, instinctive, passionate, 'dark'. This volume is the outcome of the work of an international research group, which intended to cover some aspects of this dichotomy with the specific end to prove that the two sides of the human 'soul' don't contradict each other - in such a way that one excludes, ontologically and axiologically, the other - but they are rather closely interrelated and interdependent. Scholars with different expertise in the history of thought tackled diachronically some key moments of this story, from different angles and with different approaches, from ancient thought to modern neurosciences. The volume contains contributions of Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Institute of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University), R. Loredana Cardullo (University of Catania), Francesco Coniglione (University of Catania), Santo Di Nuovo (University of Catania), Daniele Iozzia (University of Catania), Syliane Malinowski-Charles (Université du Québec à Trois Rivière), Concetto Martello (University of Catania), Alexandra Michalewski (Paris - Sorbonne, CNRS), Chiara Militello (University of Catania), Sebastian Moro Tornese (United Kingdom), Jean-Marc Narbonne (Laval Université, Canada), Anne Sheppard (Royal Holloway, University of London), Salvatore Vasta (University of Catania), Andrea Vella (University of Catania). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5105","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5105,"authors_free":[{"id":5879,"entry_id":5105,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" R. Loredana Cardullo","free_first_name":" R. Loredana ","free_last_name":"Cardullo","norm_person":null},{"id":5880,"entry_id":5105,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Francesco Coniglione ","free_first_name":" Francesco ","free_last_name":" Coniglione ","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives"},"abstract":"The reason\/no-reason conceptual pair (also declinable in the similar forms of rational\/a-rational, logical\/a-logical) pervades the history of Western thought from the archaic era up to contemporary times. Perceived in different historical periods and in different cultural forms either as a conflict or as a vital coexistence, the reason\/no-reason pair was first theorized and legitimated as a sharp contrast in antiquity with the Pythagorean systoichiai, and at the dawn of the twentieth century it was successfully exemplified by Nietzsche through the opposition between Apollonian and Dionysian principles, which denotes respectively the harmonious, orderly, 'bright' side of the human soul, and the chaotic one, wild, instinctive, passionate, 'dark'. This volume is the outcome of the work of an international research group, which intended to cover some aspects of this dichotomy with the specific end to prove that the two sides of the human 'soul' don't contradict each other - in such a way that one excludes, ontologically and axiologically, the other - but they are rather closely interrelated and interdependent. Scholars with different expertise in the history of thought tackled diachronically some key moments of this story, from different angles and with different approaches, from ancient thought to modern neurosciences. The volume contains contributions of Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Institute of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University), R. Loredana Cardullo (University of Catania), Francesco Coniglione (University of Catania), Santo Di Nuovo (University of Catania), Daniele Iozzia (University of Catania), Syliane Malinowski-Charles (Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec \u00e0 Trois Rivi\u00e8re), Concetto Martello (University of Catania), Alexandra Michalewski (Paris - Sorbonne, CNRS), Chiara Militello (University of Catania), Sebastian Moro Tornese (United Kingdom), Jean-Marc Narbonne (Laval Universit\u00e9, Canada), Anne Sheppard (Royal Holloway, University of London), Salvatore Vasta (University of Catania), Andrea Vella (University of Catania).","btype":4,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":25,"category_name":"Neoplatonism","link":"bib?categories[]=Neoplatonism"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":60,"category_name":"Spinoza","link":"bib?categories[]=Spinoza"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5105,"pubplace":"Sankt Augustin","publisher":"Academia Verlag","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives"]}
| Title | The Medieval Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos. Celestial Influences on the Sublunary World in Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, and Averroes |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2009 |
| Published in | New Perspectives on Aristotle's De caelo |
| Pages | 239–281 |
| Categories | Cosmology, Alexander of Aphrodisias, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Gad Freudenthal |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1362","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1362,"authors_free":[{"id":1550,"entry_id":1362,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":735,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gad Freudenthal","free_first_name":"Gad","free_last_name":"Freudenthal","norm_person":{"id":735,"first_name":"Gad","last_name":"Freudenthal","full_name":"Gad Freudenthal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/113178123","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73881241","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd113178123.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gad Freudenthal"}}],"entry_title":"The Medieval Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos. Celestial Influences on the Sublunary World in Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, and Averroes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Medieval Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos. Celestial Influences on the Sublunary World in Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, and Averroes"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":735,"full_name":"Gad Freudenthal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1362,"section_of":169,"pages":"239\u2013281","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":169,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"New Perspectives on Aristotle's De caelo","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2009","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2009","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":169,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Philosophia Antiqua","volume":"117","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["The Medieval Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos. Celestial Influences on the Sublunary World in Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, and Averroes"]}
| Title | The Medieval Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos. From Alexander of Aphrodisias to Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 59 |
| Pages | 29–68 |
| Categories | Cosmology, Alexander of Aphrodisias |
| Author(s) | Gad Freudenthal |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1363","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1363,"authors_free":[{"id":1551,"entry_id":1363,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":735,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gad Freudenthal","free_first_name":"Gad","free_last_name":"Freudenthal","norm_person":{"id":735,"first_name":"Gad","last_name":"Freudenthal","full_name":"Gad Freudenthal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/113178123","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73881241","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd113178123.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gad Freudenthal"}}],"entry_title":"The Medieval Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos. From Alexander of Aphrodisias to Averroes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Medieval Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos. From Alexander of Aphrodisias to Averroes"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"}],"authors":[{"id":735,"full_name":"Gad Freudenthal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1363,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"59","issue":null,"pages":"29\u201368"}},"sort":["The Medieval Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos. From Alexander of Aphrodisias to Averroes"]}
| Title | Why the Prime Mover Is Not an Exclusively Final Cause. Alexander of Aphrodisias and Averroes |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Published in | Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions |
| Pages | 29-55 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Alexander of Aphrodisias |
| Author(s) | David Twetten |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5607","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5607,"authors_free":[{"id":6509,"entry_id":5607,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":919,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"David Twetten","free_first_name":"David ","free_last_name":"Twetten","norm_person":{"id":919,"first_name":"David B.","last_name":"Twetten","full_name":"David B. Twetten","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/156465876","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/105722162","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=David B. Twetten"}}],"entry_title":"Why the Prime Mover Is Not an Exclusively Final Cause. Alexander of Aphrodisias and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Why the Prime Mover Is Not an Exclusively Final Cause. Alexander of Aphrodisias and Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781003309895-3","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"}],"authors":[{"id":919,"full_name":"David B. Twetten","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5607,"section_of":5606,"pages":"29-55","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5606,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2023","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This volume brings together contributions from distinguished scholars in the history of philosophy, focusing on points of interaction between discrete historical contexts, religions, and cultures found within the premodern period. The contributions connect thinkers from antiquity through the Middle Ages and include philosophers from the three major monotheistic faiths\u2014Judaism, Islam, and Christianity.\r\n\r\nBy emphasizing premodern philosophy\u2019s shared textual roots in antiquity, particularly the writings of Plato and Aristotle, the volume highlights points of cross-pollination between different schools, cultures, and moments in premodern thought. Approaching the complex history of the premodern world in an accessible way, the editors organize the volume so as to underscore the difficulties the premodern period poses for scholars, while accentuating the fascinating interplay between the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin philosophical traditions. The contributors cover many topics ranging from the aims of Aristotle\u2019s cosmos, the adoption of Aristotle\u2019s Organon by al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, and the origins of the Plotiniana Arabica to the role of Ibn Gabirol\u2019s Fons vitae in the Latin West, the ways in which Islamic philosophy shaped thirteenth-century Latin conceptions of light, Roger Bacon\u2019s adaptation of Avicenna for use in his moral philosophy, and beyond. The volume\u2019s focus on \"source-based contextualism\" demonstrates an appreciation for the rich diversity of thought found in the premodern period, while revealing methodological challenges raised by the historical study of premodern philosophy.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5606,"pubplace":"New York","publisher":"Routledge ","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6507,"entry_id":5606,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1684,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Katja Krause","free_first_name":"Katja ","free_last_name":"Krause","norm_person":{"id":1684,"first_name":"Katja","last_name":"Krause","full_name":"Katja Krause","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077759428","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":6508,"entry_id":5606,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Why the Prime Mover Is Not an Exclusively Final Cause. Alexander of Aphrodisias and Averroes"]}