| Title | Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes’s Novel Placement of the Platonic City |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
| Pages | 19–39 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Galen, Aristotle, Plato, Politics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Alexander Orwin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” goes far beyond merely commenting on the original. With the benefit of 1,500 years of hindsight, it reckons with important works of philosophy that would have been completely unknown to Plato. Averroes mentions three authors of such works by name: Galen, whom he mostly rebukes, Aristotle, and Alfarabi. It would be hasty to assert that by including such extraneous material, Averroes departs from Plato, but, at the very least, he updates him on account of historical developments. The importance of Averroes's post-Platonic additions is evident from the very structure of the work. The part of it that can plausibly claim to be a commentary on Plato does not begin until 27.24, almost seven pages into Rosenthal's Hebrew text. Averroes begins to address the subject of war, corresponding to Republic 374b, having skipped all of book 1 and the majority of book 2, with only two brief references to them in the opening section (CR 22.27–30, 23.31–33, cf. 47.29–30and 105.25–27). Averroes does not justify his omission until the very end of the work, when he states that the opening part of the Republic does not contain any of the demonstrative arguments of which his commentary is comprised (CR 105.25–27, cf. 21.4). He is more immediately forthright about the reasons for what he includes in its place. In keeping with the demonstrative focus of the work, Averroes replaces Platonic dialectic with a substantial discussion of science. Having divided practical science into two parts, one about general habits and actions and another about their implementation, Averroes explains: “Before we begin a point-by-point explanation of what is in these arguments [of Plato], we ought to mention the things pertinent to this [second] part [of practical science] and explained in the first part, that serve as foundation for what we wish to say here at the beginning” (CR 22.6–8). Averroes's introduction concerns above all the first part of political science, while the Republic proper contains only the second. Averroes attributes to Plato only a small part of the ensuing discussion, concerning justice, the division of labor, and the arrangement of the soul (CR 22.22–24.6, esp. 22.27, 23.31). The other passages are inspired by Aristotle and especially Alfarabi. Averroes appears to substitute scientific arguments from Aristotle and Alfarabi—mainly about science, philosophy, courage, and war—for Plato's dialectical introduction about justice and the founding of the just city. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5347","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5347,"authors_free":[{"id":6197,"entry_id":5347,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1790,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":"Alexander","free_last_name":"Orwin","norm_person":{"id":1790,"first_name":" Alexander","last_name":" Orwin","full_name":" Alexander Orwin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/1153328348","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]= Alexander Orwin"}}],"entry_title":"Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City"},"abstract":"Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d goes far beyond merely commenting on the original. With the benefit of 1,500 years of hindsight, it reckons with important works of philosophy that would have been completely unknown to Plato. Averroes mentions three authors of such works by name: Galen, whom he mostly rebukes, Aristotle, and Alfarabi. It would be hasty to assert that by including such extraneous material, Averroes departs from Plato, but, at the very least, he updates him on account of historical developments.\r\n\r\nThe importance of Averroes's post-Platonic additions is evident from the very structure of the work. The part of it that can plausibly claim to be a commentary on Plato does not begin until 27.24, almost seven pages into Rosenthal's Hebrew text. Averroes begins to address the subject of war, corresponding to Republic 374b, having skipped all of book 1 and the majority of book 2, with only two brief references to them in the opening section (CR 22.27\u201330, 23.31\u201333, cf. 47.29\u201330and 105.25\u201327). Averroes does not justify his omission until the very end of the work, when he states that the opening part of the Republic does not contain any of the demonstrative arguments of which his commentary is comprised (CR 105.25\u201327, cf. 21.4). He is more immediately forthright about the reasons for what he includes in its place. In keeping with the demonstrative focus of the work, Averroes replaces Platonic dialectic with a substantial discussion of science. Having divided practical science into two parts, one about general habits and actions and another about their implementation, Averroes explains: \u201cBefore we begin a point-by-point explanation of what is in these arguments [of Plato], we ought to mention the things pertinent to this [second] part [of practical science] and explained in the first part, that serve as foundation for what we wish to say here at the beginning\u201d (CR 22.6\u20138). Averroes's introduction concerns above all the first part of political science, while the Republic proper contains only the second. Averroes attributes to Plato only a small part of the ensuing discussion, concerning justice, the division of labor, and the arrangement of the soul (CR 22.22\u201324.6, esp. 22.27, 23.31). The other passages are inspired by Aristotle and especially Alfarabi. Averroes appears to substitute scientific arguments from Aristotle and Alfarabi\u2014mainly about science, philosophy, courage, and war\u2014for Plato's dialectical introduction about justice and the founding of the just city.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.002","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1790,"full_name":" Alexander Orwin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5347,"section_of":5346,"pages":"19\u201339","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Médecins et philosophes: Une histoire |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2019 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | CNRS |
| Categories | Medicine, Plato, Aristotle, Galen, Renaissance |
| Author(s) | Claire Grignon , David Lefebvre |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Depuis la séparation entre médecine et philosophie traditionnellement attribuée à Hippocrate, les relations entre ces disciplines ont toujours été intenses et parfois conflictuelles. C’est une histoire de ces rapports que proposent les quinze études réunies dans cet ouvrage, en se centrant sur quelques figures ou moments déterminants: Platon, Aristote, Galien, les écoles empirique et méthodiste, al-Rāzī, Averroès, le XVIe siècle italien, Locke, Kant, Cabanis, les philosophes-médecins de la IIIe République, Canguilhem ou encore Jaspers. Si aujourd’hui la demande adressée à la philosophie par les médecins concerne principalement l’éthique, le dialogue entre les deux disciplines a porté historiquement d’abord sur le statut épistémologique de la médecine : le meilleur médecin est-il nécessairement philosophe ? Que peut apprendre la philosophie de la méthode du médecin ? La médecine est-elle un art du cas singulier, une science ou les deux ? En s’inscrivant dans le temps long, ces études rappellent que l’institutionnalisation actuelle de la philosophie de la médecine s’accompagne parfois d’un oubli des origines historiques de la réflexion sur la médecine. Le contact avec la médecine conduisant aussi la philosophie à se souvenir qu’elle se définit comme un genre de vie, c’est la question de l’amélioration du bien-être et de la santé des hommes qui se pose alors, dans un environnement que l’introduction de techniques thérapeutiques nouvelles modifie en permanence. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5085","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5085,"authors_free":[{"id":5850,"entry_id":5085,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Claire Grignon","free_first_name":"Claire ","free_last_name":"Grignon","norm_person":null},{"id":5851,"entry_id":5085,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"David Lefebvre","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Lefebvre","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"M\u00e9decins et philosophes: Une histoire","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"M\u00e9decins et philosophes: Une histoire"},"abstract":"Depuis la s\u00e9paration entre m\u00e9decine et philosophie traditionnellement attribu\u00e9e \u00e0 Hippocrate, les relations entre ces disciplines ont toujours \u00e9t\u00e9 intenses et parfois conflictuelles. C\u2019est une histoire de ces rapports que proposent les quinze \u00e9tudes r\u00e9unies dans cet ouvrage, en se centrant sur quelques figures ou moments d\u00e9terminants: Platon, Aristote, Galien, les \u00e9coles empirique et m\u00e9thodiste, al-R\u0101z\u012b, Averro\u00e8s, le XVIe si\u00e8cle italien, Locke, Kant, Cabanis, les philosophes-m\u00e9decins de la IIIe R\u00e9publique, Canguilhem ou encore Jaspers.\r\nSi aujourd\u2019hui la demande adress\u00e9e \u00e0 la philosophie par les m\u00e9decins concerne principalement l\u2019\u00e9thique, le dialogue entre les deux disciplines a port\u00e9 historiquement d\u2019abord sur le statut \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique de la m\u00e9decine : le meilleur m\u00e9decin est-il n\u00e9cessairement philosophe ? Que peut apprendre la philosophie de la m\u00e9thode du m\u00e9decin ? La m\u00e9decine est-elle un art du cas singulier, une science ou les deux ?\r\nEn s\u2019inscrivant dans le temps long, ces \u00e9tudes rappellent que l\u2019institutionnalisation actuelle de la philosophie de la m\u00e9decine s\u2019accompagne parfois d\u2019un oubli des origines historiques de la r\u00e9flexion sur la m\u00e9decine. Le contact avec la m\u00e9decine conduisant aussi la philosophie \u00e0 se souvenir qu\u2019elle se d\u00e9finit comme un genre de vie, c\u2019est la question de l\u2019am\u00e9lioration du bien-\u00eatre et de la sant\u00e9 des hommes qui se pose alors, dans un environnement que l\u2019introduction de techniques th\u00e9rapeutiques nouvelles modifie en permanence.","btype":4,"date":"2019","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5085,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"CNRS","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Le plaisir des femmes selon Aristote. Averroès contre Galien sur Natura nihil facit frustra |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Philosophie Antique |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 63–102 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Natural Philosophy, Galen |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article is devoted to the biological phenomenon of female sexual pleasure and aims at determining its causal role in Aristotle’s biological doctrine. In considering several passages of the De Generatione Animalium, the author suggests that female sexual pleasure is one of the phenomena that Aristotle defines as “for what is better”. The study of this phenomenon provides the opportunity to rethink the place of the final cause in Aristotle’s causal system and the nature of the so-called “derivative” teleology. In the second part of the study, the author provides an overview of the Greco-Arabic reception of Aristotle’s doctrine. The study of the debate prompted by Averroes against Galen in the xiith century AD shows the importance of the issue of female sexual pleasure in the Greco-Arabic peripatetism and clarifies in turn the doctrine of the Stagyrite. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5223","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5223,"authors_free":[{"id":6026,"entry_id":5223,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Le plaisir des femmes selon Aristote. Averro\u00e8s contre Galien sur Natura nihil facit frustra","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Le plaisir des femmes selon Aristote. Averro\u00e8s contre Galien sur Natura nihil facit frustra"},"abstract":"This article is devoted to the biological phenomenon of female sexual pleasure and aims at determining its causal role in Aristotle\u2019s biological doctrine. In considering several passages of the De Generatione Animalium, the author suggests that female sexual pleasure is one of the phenomena that Aristotle defines as \u201cfor what is better\u201d. The study of this phenomenon provides the opportunity to rethink the place of the final cause in Aristotle\u2019s causal system and the nature of the so-called \u201cderivative\u201d teleology. In the second part of the study, the author provides an overview of the Greco-Arabic reception of Aristotle\u2019s doctrine. The study of the debate prompted by Averroes against Galen in the xiith century AD shows the importance of the issue of female sexual pleasure in the Greco-Arabic peripatetism and clarifies in turn the doctrine of the Stagyrite.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4000\/philosant.597","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5223,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophie Antique","volume":"16","issue":"","pages":"63\u2013102"}},"sort":[2016]}
| Title | Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800–1200) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1998 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Neurosciences |
| Volume | 7 |
| Pages | 174–185 |
| Categories | Medicine, Galen, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Axel Karenberg , Irmgard Hort |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"531","_score":null,"_source":{"id":531,"authors_free":[{"id":677,"entry_id":531,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":806,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Axel Karenberg","free_first_name":"Axel","free_last_name":"Karenberg","norm_person":{"id":806,"first_name":"Axel","last_name":"Karenberg","full_name":"Axel Karenberg","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129591378","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/70013349","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Axel Karenberg"}},{"id":678,"entry_id":531,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":807,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Irmgard Hort","free_first_name":"Irmgard","free_last_name":"Hort","norm_person":{"id":807,"first_name":"Irmgard","last_name":"Hort","full_name":"Irmgard Hort","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111835852","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/62185524","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Irmgard Hort"}}],"entry_title":"Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800\u20131200)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800\u20131200)"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":806,"full_name":"Axel Karenberg","role":1},{"id":807,"full_name":"Irmgard Hort","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":531,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Neurosciences","volume":"7","issue":null,"pages":"174\u2013185"}},"sort":[1998]}
| Title | Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes’s Novel Placement of the Platonic City |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
| Pages | 19–39 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Galen, Aristotle, Plato, Politics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Alexander Orwin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” goes far beyond merely commenting on the original. With the benefit of 1,500 years of hindsight, it reckons with important works of philosophy that would have been completely unknown to Plato. Averroes mentions three authors of such works by name: Galen, whom he mostly rebukes, Aristotle, and Alfarabi. It would be hasty to assert that by including such extraneous material, Averroes departs from Plato, but, at the very least, he updates him on account of historical developments. The importance of Averroes's post-Platonic additions is evident from the very structure of the work. The part of it that can plausibly claim to be a commentary on Plato does not begin until 27.24, almost seven pages into Rosenthal's Hebrew text. Averroes begins to address the subject of war, corresponding to Republic 374b, having skipped all of book 1 and the majority of book 2, with only two brief references to them in the opening section (CR 22.27–30, 23.31–33, cf. 47.29–30and 105.25–27). Averroes does not justify his omission until the very end of the work, when he states that the opening part of the Republic does not contain any of the demonstrative arguments of which his commentary is comprised (CR 105.25–27, cf. 21.4). He is more immediately forthright about the reasons for what he includes in its place. In keeping with the demonstrative focus of the work, Averroes replaces Platonic dialectic with a substantial discussion of science. Having divided practical science into two parts, one about general habits and actions and another about their implementation, Averroes explains: “Before we begin a point-by-point explanation of what is in these arguments [of Plato], we ought to mention the things pertinent to this [second] part [of practical science] and explained in the first part, that serve as foundation for what we wish to say here at the beginning” (CR 22.6–8). Averroes's introduction concerns above all the first part of political science, while the Republic proper contains only the second. Averroes attributes to Plato only a small part of the ensuing discussion, concerning justice, the division of labor, and the arrangement of the soul (CR 22.22–24.6, esp. 22.27, 23.31). The other passages are inspired by Aristotle and especially Alfarabi. Averroes appears to substitute scientific arguments from Aristotle and Alfarabi—mainly about science, philosophy, courage, and war—for Plato's dialectical introduction about justice and the founding of the just city. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5347","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5347,"authors_free":[{"id":6197,"entry_id":5347,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1790,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":"Alexander","free_last_name":"Orwin","norm_person":{"id":1790,"first_name":" Alexander","last_name":" Orwin","full_name":" Alexander Orwin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/1153328348","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]= Alexander Orwin"}}],"entry_title":"Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City"},"abstract":"Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d goes far beyond merely commenting on the original. With the benefit of 1,500 years of hindsight, it reckons with important works of philosophy that would have been completely unknown to Plato. Averroes mentions three authors of such works by name: Galen, whom he mostly rebukes, Aristotle, and Alfarabi. It would be hasty to assert that by including such extraneous material, Averroes departs from Plato, but, at the very least, he updates him on account of historical developments.\r\n\r\nThe importance of Averroes's post-Platonic additions is evident from the very structure of the work. The part of it that can plausibly claim to be a commentary on Plato does not begin until 27.24, almost seven pages into Rosenthal's Hebrew text. Averroes begins to address the subject of war, corresponding to Republic 374b, having skipped all of book 1 and the majority of book 2, with only two brief references to them in the opening section (CR 22.27\u201330, 23.31\u201333, cf. 47.29\u201330and 105.25\u201327). Averroes does not justify his omission until the very end of the work, when he states that the opening part of the Republic does not contain any of the demonstrative arguments of which his commentary is comprised (CR 105.25\u201327, cf. 21.4). He is more immediately forthright about the reasons for what he includes in its place. In keeping with the demonstrative focus of the work, Averroes replaces Platonic dialectic with a substantial discussion of science. Having divided practical science into two parts, one about general habits and actions and another about their implementation, Averroes explains: \u201cBefore we begin a point-by-point explanation of what is in these arguments [of Plato], we ought to mention the things pertinent to this [second] part [of practical science] and explained in the first part, that serve as foundation for what we wish to say here at the beginning\u201d (CR 22.6\u20138). Averroes's introduction concerns above all the first part of political science, while the Republic proper contains only the second. Averroes attributes to Plato only a small part of the ensuing discussion, concerning justice, the division of labor, and the arrangement of the soul (CR 22.22\u201324.6, esp. 22.27, 23.31). The other passages are inspired by Aristotle and especially Alfarabi. Averroes appears to substitute scientific arguments from Aristotle and Alfarabi\u2014mainly about science, philosophy, courage, and war\u2014for Plato's dialectical introduction about justice and the founding of the just city.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.002","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1790,"full_name":" Alexander Orwin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5347,"section_of":5346,"pages":"19\u201339","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City"]}
| Title | Le plaisir des femmes selon Aristote. Averroès contre Galien sur Natura nihil facit frustra |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Philosophie Antique |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 63–102 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Natural Philosophy, Galen |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article is devoted to the biological phenomenon of female sexual pleasure and aims at determining its causal role in Aristotle’s biological doctrine. In considering several passages of the De Generatione Animalium, the author suggests that female sexual pleasure is one of the phenomena that Aristotle defines as “for what is better”. The study of this phenomenon provides the opportunity to rethink the place of the final cause in Aristotle’s causal system and the nature of the so-called “derivative” teleology. In the second part of the study, the author provides an overview of the Greco-Arabic reception of Aristotle’s doctrine. The study of the debate prompted by Averroes against Galen in the xiith century AD shows the importance of the issue of female sexual pleasure in the Greco-Arabic peripatetism and clarifies in turn the doctrine of the Stagyrite. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5223","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5223,"authors_free":[{"id":6026,"entry_id":5223,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Le plaisir des femmes selon Aristote. Averro\u00e8s contre Galien sur Natura nihil facit frustra","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Le plaisir des femmes selon Aristote. Averro\u00e8s contre Galien sur Natura nihil facit frustra"},"abstract":"This article is devoted to the biological phenomenon of female sexual pleasure and aims at determining its causal role in Aristotle\u2019s biological doctrine. In considering several passages of the De Generatione Animalium, the author suggests that female sexual pleasure is one of the phenomena that Aristotle defines as \u201cfor what is better\u201d. The study of this phenomenon provides the opportunity to rethink the place of the final cause in Aristotle\u2019s causal system and the nature of the so-called \u201cderivative\u201d teleology. In the second part of the study, the author provides an overview of the Greco-Arabic reception of Aristotle\u2019s doctrine. The study of the debate prompted by Averroes against Galen in the xiith century AD shows the importance of the issue of female sexual pleasure in the Greco-Arabic peripatetism and clarifies in turn the doctrine of the Stagyrite.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4000\/philosant.597","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5223,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophie Antique","volume":"16","issue":"","pages":"63\u2013102"}},"sort":["Le plaisir des femmes selon Aristote. Averro\u00e8s contre Galien sur Natura nihil facit frustra"]}
| Title | Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800–1200) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1998 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Neurosciences |
| Volume | 7 |
| Pages | 174–185 |
| Categories | Medicine, Galen, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Axel Karenberg , Irmgard Hort |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"531","_score":null,"_source":{"id":531,"authors_free":[{"id":677,"entry_id":531,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":806,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Axel Karenberg","free_first_name":"Axel","free_last_name":"Karenberg","norm_person":{"id":806,"first_name":"Axel","last_name":"Karenberg","full_name":"Axel Karenberg","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129591378","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/70013349","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Axel Karenberg"}},{"id":678,"entry_id":531,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":807,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Irmgard Hort","free_first_name":"Irmgard","free_last_name":"Hort","norm_person":{"id":807,"first_name":"Irmgard","last_name":"Hort","full_name":"Irmgard Hort","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111835852","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/62185524","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Irmgard Hort"}}],"entry_title":"Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800\u20131200)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800\u20131200)"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":806,"full_name":"Axel Karenberg","role":1},{"id":807,"full_name":"Irmgard Hort","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":531,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Neurosciences","volume":"7","issue":null,"pages":"174\u2013185"}},"sort":["Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800\u20131200)"]}
| Title | Médecins et philosophes: Une histoire |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2019 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | CNRS |
| Categories | Medicine, Plato, Aristotle, Galen, Renaissance |
| Author(s) | Claire Grignon , David Lefebvre |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Depuis la séparation entre médecine et philosophie traditionnellement attribuée à Hippocrate, les relations entre ces disciplines ont toujours été intenses et parfois conflictuelles. C’est une histoire de ces rapports que proposent les quinze études réunies dans cet ouvrage, en se centrant sur quelques figures ou moments déterminants: Platon, Aristote, Galien, les écoles empirique et méthodiste, al-Rāzī, Averroès, le XVIe siècle italien, Locke, Kant, Cabanis, les philosophes-médecins de la IIIe République, Canguilhem ou encore Jaspers. Si aujourd’hui la demande adressée à la philosophie par les médecins concerne principalement l’éthique, le dialogue entre les deux disciplines a porté historiquement d’abord sur le statut épistémologique de la médecine : le meilleur médecin est-il nécessairement philosophe ? Que peut apprendre la philosophie de la méthode du médecin ? La médecine est-elle un art du cas singulier, une science ou les deux ? En s’inscrivant dans le temps long, ces études rappellent que l’institutionnalisation actuelle de la philosophie de la médecine s’accompagne parfois d’un oubli des origines historiques de la réflexion sur la médecine. Le contact avec la médecine conduisant aussi la philosophie à se souvenir qu’elle se définit comme un genre de vie, c’est la question de l’amélioration du bien-être et de la santé des hommes qui se pose alors, dans un environnement que l’introduction de techniques thérapeutiques nouvelles modifie en permanence. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5085","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5085,"authors_free":[{"id":5850,"entry_id":5085,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Claire Grignon","free_first_name":"Claire ","free_last_name":"Grignon","norm_person":null},{"id":5851,"entry_id":5085,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"David Lefebvre","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Lefebvre","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"M\u00e9decins et philosophes: Une histoire","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"M\u00e9decins et philosophes: Une histoire"},"abstract":"Depuis la s\u00e9paration entre m\u00e9decine et philosophie traditionnellement attribu\u00e9e \u00e0 Hippocrate, les relations entre ces disciplines ont toujours \u00e9t\u00e9 intenses et parfois conflictuelles. C\u2019est une histoire de ces rapports que proposent les quinze \u00e9tudes r\u00e9unies dans cet ouvrage, en se centrant sur quelques figures ou moments d\u00e9terminants: Platon, Aristote, Galien, les \u00e9coles empirique et m\u00e9thodiste, al-R\u0101z\u012b, Averro\u00e8s, le XVIe si\u00e8cle italien, Locke, Kant, Cabanis, les philosophes-m\u00e9decins de la IIIe R\u00e9publique, Canguilhem ou encore Jaspers.\r\nSi aujourd\u2019hui la demande adress\u00e9e \u00e0 la philosophie par les m\u00e9decins concerne principalement l\u2019\u00e9thique, le dialogue entre les deux disciplines a port\u00e9 historiquement d\u2019abord sur le statut \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique de la m\u00e9decine : le meilleur m\u00e9decin est-il n\u00e9cessairement philosophe ? Que peut apprendre la philosophie de la m\u00e9thode du m\u00e9decin ? La m\u00e9decine est-elle un art du cas singulier, une science ou les deux ?\r\nEn s\u2019inscrivant dans le temps long, ces \u00e9tudes rappellent que l\u2019institutionnalisation actuelle de la philosophie de la m\u00e9decine s\u2019accompagne parfois d\u2019un oubli des origines historiques de la r\u00e9flexion sur la m\u00e9decine. Le contact avec la m\u00e9decine conduisant aussi la philosophie \u00e0 se souvenir qu\u2019elle se d\u00e9finit comme un genre de vie, c\u2019est la question de l\u2019am\u00e9lioration du bien-\u00eatre et de la sant\u00e9 des hommes qui se pose alors, dans un environnement que l\u2019introduction de techniques th\u00e9rapeutiques nouvelles modifie en permanence.","btype":4,"date":"2019","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5085,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"CNRS","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["M\u00e9decins et philosophes: Une histoire"]}