{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5559","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5559,"authors_free":[{"id":6453,"entry_id":5559,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anthony Raphael Etuk","free_first_name":"Anthony Raphael ","free_last_name":"Etuk","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Revisiting Averroes\u2019 Influence on Western Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Revisiting Averroes\u2019 Influence on Western Philosophy"},"abstract":"Better known as Averroes, Ibn Rushd remains one of the greatest \r\nIslamic philosophical geniuses of all times. The unparalleled \r\ninventiveness of his mind and the \u2015audacity\u2016 of his methods are evident \r\nin many of his innovative philosophical activities, which tremendous \r\nstirred the minds of his contemporaries in the Middle Ages. Perhaps \r\nonly a few would deny the far-reaching impacts of his profound \r\nphilosophical activities and ideas on Western philosophy. Prominent \r\namong these are his unique status as a paramount guide to Aristotle, \r\nbased on his influential and massive commentaries on Aristotle, and his \r\nstrong arguments for the compatibility of philosophy with religion. \r\nThese and more, have since established the depth of his ideas and his \r\nlasting relevance in Western philosophy history. This paper undertakes \r\nan exposition of his philosophical activities, to identify the impacts of \r\nhis enduring legacies on Western philosophy. The expository and \r\nhermeneutical methods of analysis are adopted.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5559,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research","volume":"19","issue":"1","pages":"174-194"}},"sort":[2022]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5564","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5564,"authors_free":[{"id":6458,"entry_id":5564,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":649,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Augusto Illuminati","free_first_name":"Augusto ","free_last_name":"Illuminati","norm_person":{"id":649,"first_name":"Augusto","last_name":"Illuminati","full_name":"Augusto Illuminati","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111652483X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/93448260","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Augusto Illuminati"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8, una traduzione ininterrotta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8, una traduzione ininterrotta"},"abstract":"La mia collaborazione con Massimo Campanini si \u00e8 sviluppata su comuni interessi per i classici del pensiero islamico ma con competenze assai diverse, essendo io pi\u00f9 orientato a studiare gli effetti e gli sviluppi che essi produssero sul pensiero occidentale medievale e moderno attraverso una pratica di traduzioni spesso creative per imprecisione \u2013 l\u2019inverso dell\u2019operazione che essi stessi avevano fatto rispetto a Platone e Aristotele.\r\nAverro\u00e8-Ibn Rushd \u00e8 gi\u00e0 un bell\u2019esempio di deformazione del nome, ma proprio la formazione della sua opera e i modi in cui \u00e8 stata trasmessa al mondo ebraico e cristiano sono singolari testimonianze degli esiti ambigui del processo traduttivo. Cerchiamo infatti di mostrare come la lettura del De substantia orbis abbia stimolato sia nel Medioevo che nel Rinascimento non solo il rifiuto del creazionismo ma anche posizioni panteistiche, mentre la famosa tesi dell\u2019intelletto materiale unico contenuta nel Commentarium Magnum al De anima aristotelico ha stimolato molteplici varianti del monopsichismo, da Spinoza a Marx e alla pi\u00f9 recente letteratura post-strutturalista.\r\n\r\nMy collaboration with Massimo Campanini developed around our common interests in the classics of Islamic thought, but with very different approaches, since I am more oriented towards studying the effects and developments they produced on medieval and modern Western thought through a practice of translation that was often creative in terms of inaccuracy \u2013 so the opposite of what had been done with respect to Plato and Aristotle.\r\nThe same Averroes-Ibn Rushd is a fine example of name distortion, and the very formation of his work and the ways in which it was transmitted to the Jewish and Christian world are singular testimonies to the ambiguous outcomes of this translation process. I try to show how the reading of De substantia orbis in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance stimulated not only the rejection of creationism but also pantheistic beliefs, while the famous thesis on the material intellect exposed in the Commentarium Magnum to Aristotle\u2019s De anima stimulated many variants of monopsychism, from Spinoza to Marx and the more recent post-structuralist literature.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.54103\/2035-7362\/17830","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":52,"category_name":"Modern Interpretations and Adaptations","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Interpretations and Adaptations"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"}],"authors":[{"id":649,"full_name":"Augusto Illuminati","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5564,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Doctor Virtualis","volume":"17","issue":"Per Massimo Campanini","pages":"107-129"}},"sort":[2022]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5766","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5766,"authors_free":[{"id":6678,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abuzar Rajabi","free_first_name":"Abuzar ","free_last_name":"Rajabi","norm_person":null},{"id":6679,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morsal Azizi","free_first_name":"Morsal ","free_last_name":"Azizi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"},"abstract":"Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali\u2019s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.22108\/coth.2022.131221.1658","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5766,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"13","issue":"27","pages":"1-16"}},"sort":[2022]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5767","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5767,"authors_free":[{"id":6680,"entry_id":5767,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tineke Melkebeek","free_first_name":"Tineke ","free_last_name":"Melkebeek","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage"},"abstract":"In his commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, Ibn Rushd (Averroes) discusses the case for female guardians. Besides following Socrates\u2019s argument for female warriors, which cites the efficiency of female guard dogs, Ibn Rushd introduces an additional argument: that the female capacity for warfare is evident from the inhabitants of certain regions. Unfortunately, the precise formulation of the regions or groups he intends to mention is obscure in the existing manuscripts. Rosenthal translates \u201cthe inhabitants of deserts and frontier villages\u201d, Lerner\u2019s translation says \u201cthe inhabitants of deserts and the City of Women\u201d. This article aims to analyse these and other translations of this enigmatic passage, which has not yet been the subject of study. Concerning the second region mentioned, it seems that Ibn Rushd could be indicating Northern Spain, but he might also have been alluding to the legendary places at the coldest margins of the then-known world.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09503110.2022.2114065","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5767,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al Masaq: Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":"34 ","issue":"3","pages":"314-335"}},"sort":[2022]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5805","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5805,"authors_free":[{"id":6726,"entry_id":5805,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1902,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hamid Taieb","free_first_name":"Hamid ","free_last_name":"Taieb","norm_person":{"id":1902,"first_name":"Hamid ","last_name":"Taieb","full_name":"Hamid Taieb","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077921705","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Hamid Taieb"}}],"entry_title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis"},"abstract":"This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.5406\/21521026.39.4.03","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1902,"full_name":"Hamid Taieb","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5805,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"39","issue":"4","pages":"339-354"}},"sort":[2022]}