| Title | The Two Hebrew-into-Latin Translations of Averroes’s Commentary on Plato’s “Republic”: Method, Motivation, and Context |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
| Pages | 297–318 |
| Categories | Transmission |
| Author(s) | Michael Engel |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” was translated twice into Latin; both translations were made from the Hebrew version of Samuel ben Judah of Marseille. The first translation was done by Elijah Del Medigo (ca. 1455–93), a Crete-born Jew, who spent most of his life in northern Italy, Crete being at that time under Venetian rule. Although a devout Jew, Del Medigo's immediate intellectual milieu was Christian, mostly made up of figures related in some way to the university of Padua and to powerful circles in Venice. Most of Del Medigo's literary output was in Latin—including his Hebrew-into-Latin translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic”—and he himself translated some of his own original Latin works into Hebrew. Thematically, Del Medigo focused almost solely on the works of Averroes. His translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” was part of his general endeavour of translating and commenting on the works of Averroes, while working at the service of his Christian patrons—namely, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Domenico Grimani. On his return to Crete, toward the end of his life, Del Medigo composed his Hebrew work Beḥinat haDat, which became his most celebrated work. In that work Del Medigo examines the relation between Judaism and rational thought, determining the rational nature of Judaism as opposed to the irrational character of Christian dogmas. The second translation was by the Jewish physician and translator Jacob Mantino (d. 1549). Mantino, a Jewish physician who lived most of his life in Italy, had close relationships with bishops and cardinals to whom he dedicated several of his translations and he was the personal physician to Pope Paul III. Mantino translated many of Averroes's commentaries, and was, according to Dag Hasse, “the most prolific and most acclaimed among all Renaissance translators of Averroes.” Del Medigo's translation was never printed during the Renaissance; it was discovered by Paul Oscar Kristeller in a Siena manuscript and published as a critical edition in 1992. Mantino's translation, first published in 1539, was printed four times during the Renaissance, yet has never received a modern edition. This chapter begins with a general overview of the two translations, discussing their different nature in light of the different circumstances surrounding their production. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5360","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5360,"authors_free":[{"id":6211,"entry_id":5360,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Engel","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Engel","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Two Hebrew-into-Latin Translations of Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d: Method, Motivation, and Context","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Two Hebrew-into-Latin Translations of Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d: Method, Motivation, and Context"},"abstract":"Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d was translated twice into Latin; both translations were made from the Hebrew version of Samuel ben Judah of Marseille. The first translation was done by Elijah Del Medigo (ca. 1455\u201393), a Crete-born Jew, who spent most of his life in northern Italy, Crete being at that time under Venetian rule. Although a devout Jew, Del Medigo's immediate intellectual milieu was Christian, mostly made up of figures related in some way to the university of Padua and to powerful circles in Venice. Most of Del Medigo's literary output was in Latin\u2014including his Hebrew-into-Latin translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d\u2014and he himself translated some of his own original Latin works into Hebrew. Thematically, Del Medigo focused almost solely on the works of Averroes. His translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d was part of his general endeavour of translating and commenting on the works of Averroes, while working at the service of his Christian patrons\u2014namely, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Domenico Grimani. On his return to Crete, toward the end of his life, Del Medigo composed his Hebrew work Be\u1e25inat haDat, which became his most celebrated work. In that work Del Medigo examines the relation between Judaism and rational thought, determining the rational nature of Judaism as opposed to the irrational character of Christian dogmas.\r\n\r\nThe second translation was by the Jewish physician and translator Jacob Mantino (d. 1549). Mantino, a Jewish physician who lived most of his life in Italy, had close relationships with bishops and cardinals to whom he dedicated several of his translations and he was the personal physician to Pope Paul III. Mantino translated many of Averroes's commentaries, and was, according to Dag Hasse, \u201cthe most prolific and most acclaimed among all Renaissance translators of Averroes.\u201d\r\n\r\nDel Medigo's translation was never printed during the Renaissance; it was discovered by Paul Oscar Kristeller in a Siena manuscript and published as a critical edition in 1992. Mantino's translation, first published in 1539, was printed four times during the Renaissance, yet has never received a modern edition. This chapter begins with a general overview of the two translations, discussing their different nature in light of the different circumstances surrounding their production.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.015","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5360,"section_of":5346,"pages":"297\u2013318","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Three Readings of Averroes’s Commentary on Plato’s “Republic” in Medieval Jewish Thought |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
| Pages | 277–296 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Influence |
| Author(s) | Alexander Green |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The ethical and political writings by late medieval Jewish philosophers are generally seen to be rooted in two fundamental classical texts, Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Plato's Republic. Yet, regarding the Republic, medieval Jewish thinkers likely had no direct access to it. It was Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles's translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” into Hebrew in the 1320s that gave Hebrew readers some access to the Republic and made it the central classical text on political philosophy for Jewish thought. Indeed, it was used by Jewish thinkers for several hundred years thereafter. This chapter will focus on the question of how Plato's Republic came to influence medieval Jewish thought; in doing so, it will attempt to map out three distinct trends in how Jewish thinkers of the medieval period interpreted the Republic's core ideas. Samuel Ben Judah of Marseilles and the Translation into Hebrew The introduction of Plato's Republic into Jewish discussions on the nature of the political community took place after Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles's translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” from Arabic into Hebrew was completed in 1320 and revised in 1321 and 1322. Samuel came from an established family in Provence that had acquired wealth over multiple generations. He studied philosophy with Senor (Don) Astruc de Noves and translated works on logic and astronomy. The movement of translating the great works of science and secular philosophy from Arabic into Hebrew, which had been started in Provence by Samuel ibn Tibbon (ca. 1165−1232) in the first decades of the thirteenth century and been furthered, in large part, by his son, Moses ibn Tibbon (ca. 1195−1274), his son-in-law, Jacob Anatoli (1194−1256), and his grandson, Jacob b. Makhir (ca. 1236−1304), was gradually coming to an end after the prodigious activity of Qalonimos ben Qalonimos (ca. 1286−1328) in the first decades of the fourteenth century. It had already begun to transform Judaism into what some have termed a philosophic religion. The deficiency in this model of philosophic religion is that it was overly focused on natural science and mostly ignored practical philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5359","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5359,"authors_free":[{"id":6210,"entry_id":5359,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alexander Green","free_first_name":"Alexander","free_last_name":"Green","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Three Readings of Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d in Medieval Jewish Thought","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Three Readings of Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d in Medieval Jewish Thought"},"abstract":"The ethical and political writings by late medieval Jewish philosophers are generally seen to be rooted in two fundamental classical texts, Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Plato's Republic. Yet, regarding the Republic, medieval Jewish thinkers likely had no direct access to it. It was Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles's translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d into Hebrew in the 1320s that gave Hebrew readers some access to the Republic and made it the central classical text on political philosophy for Jewish thought. Indeed, it was used by Jewish thinkers for several hundred years thereafter. This chapter will focus on the question of how Plato's Republic came to influence medieval Jewish thought; in doing so, it will attempt to map out three distinct trends in how Jewish thinkers of the medieval period interpreted the Republic's core ideas.\r\n\r\nSamuel Ben Judah of Marseilles and the Translation into Hebrew\r\n\r\nThe introduction of Plato's Republic into Jewish discussions on the nature of the political community took place after Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles's translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d from Arabic into Hebrew was completed in 1320 and revised in 1321 and 1322. Samuel came from an established family in Provence that had acquired wealth over multiple generations. He studied philosophy with Senor (Don) Astruc de Noves and translated works on logic and astronomy. The movement of translating the great works of science and secular philosophy from Arabic into Hebrew, which had been started in Provence by Samuel ibn Tibbon (ca. 1165\u22121232) in the first decades of the thirteenth century and been furthered, in large part, by his son, Moses ibn Tibbon (ca. 1195\u22121274), his son-in-law, Jacob Anatoli (1194\u22121256), and his grandson, Jacob b. Makhir (ca. 1236\u22121304), was gradually coming to an end after the prodigious activity of Qalonimos ben Qalonimos (ca. 1286\u22121328) in the first decades of the fourteenth century. It had already begun to transform Judaism into what some have termed a philosophic religion. The deficiency in this model of philosophic religion is that it was overly focused on natural science and mostly ignored practical philosophy.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.014","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5359,"section_of":5346,"pages":"277\u2013296","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Leo Strauss and Islamic Political Thought |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publication Place | Cambridge |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press. |
| Categories | Theology, Politics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Rasoul Namazi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this book, Rasoul Namazi offers the first in-depth study of Leo Strauss' writings on Islamic political thought, a topic that interested Strauss over the course of his career. Namazi's volume focuses on several important studies by Strauss on Islamic thought. He critically analyzes Strauss's notes on Averroes' commentary on Plato's Republic and also proposes an interpretation of Strauss' theologico-political notes on the Arabian Nights. Namazi also interprets Strauss' essay on Alfarabi's enigmatic treatise, The Philosophy of Plato and provides a detailed commentary on his complex essay devoted to Alfarabi's summary of Plato's Laws. Based on previously unpublished material from Strauss' papers, Namazi's volume provides new insights into Strauss' reflections on religion, philosophy, and politics, and their relationship to wisdom, persecution, divine law, and unbelief in the works of key Muslim thinkers. His work presents Strauss as one of the most innovative historians and scholars of Islamic thought of all time. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5361","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5361,"authors_free":[{"id":6212,"entry_id":5361,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1792,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rasoul Namazi","free_first_name":"Rasoul","free_last_name":"Namazi","norm_person":{"id":1792,"first_name":"Rasoul","last_name":"Namazi","full_name":"Rasoul Namazi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1218634294","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rasoul Namazi"}}],"entry_title":"Leo Strauss and Islamic Political Thought","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Leo Strauss and Islamic Political Thought"},"abstract":"In this book, Rasoul Namazi offers the first in-depth study of Leo Strauss' writings on Islamic political thought, a topic that interested Strauss over the course of his career. Namazi's volume focuses on several important studies by Strauss on Islamic thought. He critically analyzes Strauss's notes on Averroes' commentary on Plato's Republic and also proposes an interpretation of Strauss' theologico-political notes on the Arabian Nights. Namazi also interprets Strauss' essay on Alfarabi's enigmatic treatise, The Philosophy of Plato and provides a detailed commentary on his complex essay devoted to Alfarabi's summary of Plato's Laws. Based on previously unpublished material from Strauss' papers, Namazi's volume provides new insights into Strauss' reflections on religion, philosophy, and politics, and their relationship to wisdom, persecution, divine law, and unbelief in the works of key Muslim thinkers. His work presents Strauss as one of the most innovative historians and scholars of Islamic thought of all time.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1792,"full_name":"Rasoul Namazi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5361,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press.","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Rereading Metaphysics Ε2-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 109–135 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Commentary, Providence |
| Author(s) | Dustin Klinger |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In the fresh reading proposed here of the still not satisfactorily interpreted passages in Metaphysics Ε2-3, Aristotle emerges as making a case against determinism based on a robust notion of the accident. Accidental beings are uncaused causes and have their rightful place in Aristotle's ontology. The resulting physical indeterminism is here used as a litmus test for the exegetical practice of the great Commentator, Averroes, whose self-proclaimed, and later proverbial, loyalty to Aristotle's text will be shown to give way to idiosyncratic interpretations at times. His explanations of Metaphysics Ε2-3 are sparse and no less obscure than Aristotle's text. It is only when read together with his commentaries on the Physics, to which he explicitly refers twice in his Long commentary on Metaphysics Ε2-3, that a surprising picture emerges. Averroes recycles the notion of the accident, now reconceptualised in cosmological terms, and – putting it to the opposite use of Aristotle's – weaves it into an original theory of motion that integrates both supra- and sublunar realms into a deterministic framework of uninterrupted causal chains, thus safeguarding the principle of Divine providence. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5362","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5362,"authors_free":[{"id":6213,"entry_id":5362,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dustin Klinger","free_first_name":"Dustin ","free_last_name":"Klinger","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Rereading Metaphysics \u03952-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Rereading Metaphysics \u03952-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary"},"abstract":"In the fresh reading proposed here of the still not satisfactorily interpreted passages in Metaphysics \u03952-3, Aristotle emerges as making a case against determinism based on a robust notion of the accident. Accidental beings are uncaused causes and have their rightful place in Aristotle's ontology. The resulting physical indeterminism is here used as a litmus test for the exegetical practice of the great Commentator, Averroes, whose self-proclaimed, and later proverbial, loyalty to Aristotle's text will be shown to give way to idiosyncratic interpretations at times. His explanations of Metaphysics \u03952-3 are sparse and no less obscure than Aristotle's text. It is only when read together with his commentaries on the Physics, to which he explicitly refers twice in his Long commentary on Metaphysics \u03952-3, that a surprising picture emerges. Averroes recycles the notion of the accident, now reconceptualised in cosmological terms, and \u2013 putting it to the opposite use of Aristotle's \u2013 weaves it into an original theory of motion that integrates both supra- and sublunar realms into a deterministic framework of uninterrupted causal chains, thus safeguarding the principle of Divine providence.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0957423921000138","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":68,"category_name":"Providence","link":"bib?categories[]=Providence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5362,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy ","volume":"32 ","issue":"1","pages":"109\u2013135 "}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Secundum Avenroem: Pico della Mirandola, Elia del Medigo e la «seconda rivelazione» di Averroè |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publication Place | Palermo |
| Publisher | Officina di Studi Medievali |
| Series | Machina philosophorum |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Surveys, Renaissance, Latin Averroism |
| Author(s) | Giovanni Licata |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Forse mai come nel Rinascimento vi è stato un interesse così intenso verso la filosofia e la scienza arabe. Ne sono esempio macroscopico le opere di Averroè, oggetto di una seconda massiccia ondata di traduzioni latine tra il 1488 e il 1562, dopo la prima ondata del XIII secolo. Questo volume dimostra come Giovanni Pico della Mirandola - icona mitica dell'Umanesimo e padre della scoperta della qabbalah - fu anche indiscutibile pioniere e sponsor della traduzione di un vasto corpus di opere filosofiche di Averroè (e di altri filosofi islamici ed ebrei), a partire dalle versioni ebraiche medievali. L'analisi minuziosa dei manoscritti "averroistici" posseduti e postillati da Pico ha dato avvio a un'indagine a tutto campo sulle fonti dell'averroismo rinascimentale, all'interno del quale il filosofo e traduttore ebreo-cretese Elia del Medigo (c. 1455-c. 1493) si rivela uno dei protagonisti. Le opere originali e le nuove traduzioni compiute da Del Medigo, su richiesta di Pico, costituiscono infatti l'atto di nascita di quella "seconda rivelazione" di Averroè che culminerà nella pubblicazione della monumentale edizione giuntina (1550-52, 1562) dell'Aristotele e dell'Averroè latino. Questo volume valorizza l’insieme della produzione averroistica di Del Medigo, mostrandone l’indisgiungibile rapporto con le 900 Tesi di Pico (pubblicate nel 1486) e l’importanza che rivestì anche per le successive generazioni di traduttori dall’ebraico. Di alcune opere e traduzioni di Del Medigo si offre qui, per la prima volta, l’edizione critica. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5416","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5416,"authors_free":[{"id":6283,"entry_id":5416,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1599,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":" Giovanni Licata","free_first_name":" Giovanni ","free_last_name":" Licata","norm_person":{"id":1599,"first_name":"Giovanni","last_name":"Licata","full_name":"Giovanni Licata","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1128655918","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/306437659","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Giovanni Licata"}}],"entry_title":"Secundum Avenroem: Pico della Mirandola, Elia del Medigo e la \u00abseconda rivelazione\u00bb di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Secundum Avenroem: Pico della Mirandola, Elia del Medigo e la \u00abseconda rivelazione\u00bb di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"Forse mai come nel Rinascimento vi \u00e8 stato un interesse cos\u00ec intenso verso la filosofia e la scienza arabe. Ne sono esempio macroscopico le opere di Averro\u00e8, oggetto di una seconda massiccia ondata di traduzioni latine tra il 1488 e il 1562, dopo la prima ondata del XIII secolo. Questo volume dimostra come Giovanni Pico della Mirandola - icona mitica dell'Umanesimo e padre della scoperta della qabbalah - fu anche indiscutibile pioniere e sponsor della traduzione di un vasto corpus di opere filosofiche di Averro\u00e8 (e di altri filosofi islamici ed ebrei), a partire dalle versioni ebraiche medievali. L'analisi minuziosa dei manoscritti \"averroistici\" posseduti e postillati da Pico ha dato avvio a un'indagine a tutto campo sulle fonti dell'averroismo rinascimentale, all'interno del quale il filosofo e traduttore ebreo-cretese Elia del Medigo (c. 1455-c. 1493) si rivela uno dei protagonisti. Le opere originali e le nuove traduzioni compiute da Del Medigo, su richiesta di Pico, costituiscono infatti l'atto di nascita di quella \"seconda rivelazione\" di Averro\u00e8 che culminer\u00e0 nella pubblicazione della monumentale edizione giuntina (1550-52, 1562) dell'Aristotele e dell'Averro\u00e8 latino.\r\n\r\nQuesto volume valorizza l\u2019insieme della produzione averroistica di Del Medigo, mostrandone l\u2019indisgiungibile rapporto con le 900 Tesi di Pico (pubblicate nel 1486) e l\u2019importanza che rivest\u00ec anche per le successive generazioni di traduttori dall\u2019ebraico. Di alcune opere e traduzioni di Del Medigo si offre qui, per la prima volta, l\u2019edizione critica.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1599,"full_name":"Giovanni Licata","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5416,"pubplace":"Palermo","publisher":"Officina di Studi Medievali","series":"Machina philosophorum","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publisher | Boydell & Brewer |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Logic, Theology, Politics, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Alexander Orwin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5346","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5346,"authors_free":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1790,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":{"id":1790,"first_name":" Alexander","last_name":" Orwin","full_name":" Alexander Orwin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/1153328348","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]= Alexander Orwin"}}],"entry_title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary"},"abstract":"","btype":4,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1790,"full_name":" Alexander Orwin","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | شري ما بعد الطبيعة قي ضوء منطق أرسطو: نظرية البرهان الفلسفي عند إبن رشد |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publication Place | Qatar |
| Publisher | المركز العربي للأبحاث ودراسة السياسات Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Logic, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Youssef ben Addi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5457","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5457,"authors_free":[{"id":6321,"entry_id":5457,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Youssef ben Addi","free_first_name":"Youssef","free_last_name":"ben Addi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"\u0634\u0631\u064a \u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u0629 \u0642\u064a \u0636\u0648\u0621 \u0645\u0646\u0637\u0642 \u0623\u0631\u0633\u0637\u0648: \u0646\u0638\u0631\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0647\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u064a \u0639\u0646\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f ","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"\u0634\u0631\u064a \u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u0629 \u0642\u064a \u0636\u0648\u0621 \u0645\u0646\u0637\u0642 \u0623\u0631\u0633\u0637\u0648: \u0646\u0638\u0631\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0628\u0631\u0647\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u064a \u0639\u0646\u062f \u0625\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f "},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5457,"pubplace":"Qatar","publisher":"\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0631\u0643\u0632 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0631\u0628\u064a \u0644\u0644\u0623\u0628\u062d\u0627\u062b \u0648\u062f\u0631\u0627\u0633\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u064a\u0627\u0633\u0627\u062a Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5460","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5460,"authors_free":[{"id":6324,"entry_id":5460,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tomoaki Shinoda","free_first_name":"Tomoaki","free_last_name":"Shinoda","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Animosity against those \"drowned in debt\" : an analysis of legal texts in the Mar\u012bnid period","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Animosity against those \"drowned in debt\" : an analysis of legal texts in the Mar\u012bnid period"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5460,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hesp\u00e9ris-Tamuda","volume":"57","issue":"1","pages":"301-323"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | حل ابن رشد إشكالية القوة اللامتناهية في الجسم السماوي |
| Translation | Averroes' solution of the problem of infinite force in the celestial body |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Scienes in Muslim Contexts |
| Volume | 1/2 |
| Pages | 47-95 |
| Categories | Cosmology, Physics |
| Author(s) | ِAshraf Hassan Mansour |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5463","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5463,"authors_free":[{"id":6332,"entry_id":5463,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u0650Ashraf Hassan Mansour","free_first_name":"Ashraf Hassan","free_last_name":"Mansour","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"\u202b\u062d\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0627\u0645\u062a\u0646\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0648\u064a","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Averroes' solution of the problem of infinite force in the celestial body","main_title":{"title":"\u202b\u062d\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0627\u0645\u062a\u0646\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0648\u064a"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5463,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy and Scienes in Muslim Contexts","volume":"1\/2","issue":"","pages":"47-95"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Aproximación al tema de la visión de la oscuridad en De Anima II 7 desde los comentarios de Averroes |
| Translation | Approach to the topic of the vision of darkness in De Anima II 7 from the comments of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia |
| Volume | 63 |
| Issue | 152 |
| Pages | 515 – 534 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, De anima, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Desiderio Parrilla |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El problema de la “visión escotópica”, o visión bajo condiciones de oscuridad parcial o total, es uno de los tópicos más enigmáticos y menos estudiados de la psicología aristotélica. En el artículo exponemos la exégesis de Averroes acerca de este asunto. Señalamos una dificultad que surge en el Comentario mayor en torno a algunos términos utilizados para designar la oscuridad en el conjunto de la teoría. Proponemos como solución una interpretación moderada del asunto, acorde con el “principio de economía” y la exégesis tradicional de los comentaristas. The problem of “scotopic vision”, or vision under conditions of partial or total darkness, is one of the most enigmatic and least studied topics in Aristotelian psychology. In the article we present the exegesis of Averroes on this matter. We point out a dificulty that arises in the Great Commentary around some terms used to designate the obscurity in the whole of the theory. We propose as a solution a moderate interpretation of the matter, in accordance with the “principle of economy” and the traditional exegesis of the commentators. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5558","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5558,"authors_free":[{"id":6452,"entry_id":5558,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1844,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Desiderio Parrilla","free_first_name":"Desiderio ","free_last_name":"Parrilla","norm_person":{"id":1844,"first_name":"Desiderio ","last_name":"Parrilla","full_name":"Desiderio Parrilla","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1197179534","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Desiderio Parrilla"}}],"entry_title":"Aproximaci\u00f3n al tema de la visi\u00f3n de la oscuridad en De Anima II 7 desde los comentarios de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Approach to the topic of the vision of darkness in De Anima II 7 from the comments of Averroes","main_title":{"title":"Aproximaci\u00f3n al tema de la visi\u00f3n de la oscuridad en De Anima II 7 desde los comentarios de Averroes"},"abstract":"El problema de la \u201cvisi\u00f3n escot\u00f3pica\u201d, o visi\u00f3n bajo condiciones de oscuridad parcial o total, es uno de los t\u00f3picos m\u00e1s enigm\u00e1ticos y menos estudiados de la psicolog\u00eda aristot\u00e9lica. En el art\u00edculo exponemos la ex\u00e9gesis de Averroes acerca de este asunto. Se\u00f1alamos una dificultad que surge en el Comentario mayor en torno a algunos t\u00e9rminos utilizados para designar la oscuridad en el conjunto de la teor\u00eda. Proponemos como soluci\u00f3n una interpretaci\u00f3n moderada del asunto, acorde con el \u201cprincipio de econom\u00eda\u201d y la ex\u00e9gesis tradicional de los comentaristas.\r\n\r\nThe problem of \u201cscotopic vision\u201d, or vision under conditions of partial or total darkness, is one of the most enigmatic and least studied topics in Aristotelian psychology. In the article we present the exegesis of Averroes on this matter. We point out a dificulty that arises in the Great Commentary around some terms used to designate the obscurity in the whole of the theory. We propose as a solution a moderate interpretation of the matter, in accordance with the \u201cprinciple of economy\u201d and the traditional exegesis of the commentators.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/0100-512x2022n15212dp","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1844,"full_name":"Desiderio Parrilla","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5558,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia","volume":"63","issue":"152","pages":"515 \u2013 534"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | (Re)traduction et restitution du texte d’Ibn Rushd dans sa langue d’origine: Commentaire de la République de Platon |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2013 |
| Journal | Noesis |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 163–186 |
| Categories | Politics, Transmission |
| Author(s) | Abdennour Benantar |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article analyses the problematics of retranslation and restitution of Ibn Rushd’s Commentary of Plato’s Republic, in its original language, Arabic. Being at the confluents of politics and philosophy, this book is a real political treatise. The manuscript, probably lost during the time of Ibn Rushd’s disgrace, has reached us through its Hebrew translation by Samuel Ben Juda. Ahmed Chahlane and Mohamed A. al-Jabri have tried hard to return the manuscript from Hebrew into its original language. After determining the context in which Ibn Rushd’s book was written and its consequences for the author, the article analyses the problematics of (re)translation in the absence of the original (manuscript) and particularly the task of restitution conducted by Chahlane and al-Jabri. The focus is on their methodology of restitution and on the annotations made by Chahlane to the Hebrew and English translations from Hebrew by Rosenthal and Lerner, in which mistakes and approximations are numerous. The article shows how Chahlane and al-Jabri have considered the text in its original perspective and given back its frame using the work of Ibn Rushd himself and the Arab-Islamic philosophical corpus. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5216","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5216,"authors_free":[{"id":6018,"entry_id":5216,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdennour Benantar","free_first_name":"Abdennour","free_last_name":"Benantar","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"(Re)traduction et restitution du texte d\u2019Ibn Rushd dans sa langue d\u2019origine: Commentaire de la R\u00e9publique de Platon","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"(Re)traduction et restitution du texte d\u2019Ibn Rushd dans sa langue d\u2019origine: Commentaire de la R\u00e9publique de Platon"},"abstract":"The article analyses the problematics of retranslation and restitution of Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary of Plato\u2019s Republic, in its original language, Arabic. Being at the confluents of politics and philosophy, this book is a real political treatise. The manuscript, probably lost during the time of Ibn Rushd\u2019s disgrace, has reached us through its Hebrew translation by Samuel Ben Juda. Ahmed Chahlane and Mohamed A. al-Jabri have tried hard to return the manuscript from Hebrew into its original language. After determining the context in which Ibn Rushd\u2019s book was written and its consequences for the author, the article analyses the problematics of (re)translation in the absence of the original (manuscript) and particularly the task of restitution conducted by Chahlane and al-Jabri. The focus is on their methodology of restitution and on the annotations made by Chahlane to the Hebrew and English translations from Hebrew by Rosenthal and Lerner, in which mistakes and approximations are numerous. The article shows how Chahlane and al-Jabri have considered the text in its original perspective and given back its frame using the work of Ibn Rushd himself and the Arab-Islamic philosophical corpus.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5216,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Noesis","volume":"21 ","issue":"","pages":"163\u2013186"}},"sort":["(Re)traduction et restitution du texte d\u2019Ibn Rushd dans sa langue d\u2019origine: Commentaire de la R\u00e9publique de Platon"]}
| Title | ?Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tomás de Aquino intérprete de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–63 |
| Categories | Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Mariano Pérez Carrasco |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| ¿Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? ¿Qué es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemológico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filosóficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tomás de Aquino no sólo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filosófica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos capítulos centrales. Uno de esos capítulos es el así llamado ‘‘averroísmo latino’’, fuertemente criticado por Tomás en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este artículo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tomás no sólo procura refutar la epistemología de Averroes, sino que, además, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como características del ‘‘averroísmo’’. Más específicamente, el artículo llama la atención acerca del modo en que Tomás (mal)interpreta la teoría de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en términos de su propia teoría de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1791","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1791,"authors_free":[{"id":2066,"entry_id":1791,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1507,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","free_first_name":"Mariano","free_last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","norm_person":{"id":1507,"first_name":"Mariano","last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142907456","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/160133814","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco"}}],"entry_title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"},"abstract":"\u00bfCu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? \u00bfQu\u00e9 es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemol\u00f3gico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filos\u00f3ficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no s\u00f3lo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filos\u00f3fica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos cap\u00edtulos centrales. Uno de esos cap\u00edtulos es el as\u00ed llamado \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo latino\u2019\u2019, fuertemente criticado por Tom\u00e1s en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este art\u00edculo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tom\u00e1s no s\u00f3lo procura refutar la epistemolog\u00eda de Averroes, sino que, adem\u00e1s, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como caracter\u00edsticas del \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo\u2019\u2019. M\u00e1s espec\u00edficamente, el art\u00edculo llama la atenci\u00f3n acerca del modo en que Tom\u00e1s (mal)interpreta la teor\u00eda de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en t\u00e9rminos de su propia teor\u00eda de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento).","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5209\/rev_ASHF.2012.v29.n1.39454 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1507,"full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1791,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201363"}},"sort":["?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"]}
| Title | A 14th Century Kabbalist's Excerpt from the Lost Arabic Original of Averroes' Middle Commentary on the Physics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1985 |
| Journal | Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 219–227 |
| Categories | Physics, Commentary, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Steven Harvey |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"688","_score":null,"_source":{"id":688,"authors_free":[{"id":843,"entry_id":688,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":642,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steven Harvey","free_first_name":"Steven","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":642,"first_name":"Steven","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Steven Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051482674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97890242","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Steven Harvey"}}],"entry_title":"A 14th Century Kabbalist's Excerpt from the Lost Arabic Original of Averroes' Middle Commentary on the Physics","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A 14th Century Kabbalist's Excerpt from the Lost Arabic Original of Averroes' Middle Commentary on the Physics"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1985","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":642,"full_name":"Steven Harvey","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":688,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam","volume":"6","issue":null,"pages":"219\u2013227"}},"sort":["A 14th Century Kabbalist's Excerpt from the Lost Arabic Original of Averroes' Middle Commentary on the Physics"]}
| Title | A Bibliography of Aristotle's Editions 1501–1600. 2nd Edition with Additions and Revisions by Ch. B. Schmitt |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1984 |
| Publication Place | Baden-Baden |
| Categories | Transmission |
| Author(s) | Edward F. Cranz |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1001","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1001,"authors_free":[{"id":1173,"entry_id":1001,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1066,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Edward F. Cranz","free_first_name":"Edward F.","free_last_name":"Cranz","norm_person":{"id":1066,"first_name":"Edward F.","last_name":"Cranz","full_name":"Edward F. Cranz","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/124234305","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24725019","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd124234305.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Edward F. Cranz"}}],"entry_title":"A Bibliography of Aristotle's Editions 1501\u20131600. 2nd Edition with Additions and Revisions by Ch. B. Schmitt","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A Bibliography of Aristotle's Editions 1501\u20131600. 2nd Edition with Additions and Revisions by Ch. B. Schmitt"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1984","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":1066,"full_name":"Edward F. Cranz","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1001,"pubplace":"Baden-Baden","publisher":null,"series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["A Bibliography of Aristotle's Editions 1501\u20131600. 2nd Edition with Additions and Revisions by Ch. B. Schmitt"]}
| Title | A Call for Rationalism. 'Arab Averroists' in the Twentieth Century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Alif. Journal of Comparative Poetics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 97–132 |
| Categories | Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Modern Readings |
| Author(s) | Anke von Kügelgen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1615","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1615,"authors_free":[{"id":1853,"entry_id":1615,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":868,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anke von K\u00fcgelgen","free_first_name":"Anke","free_last_name":"von K\u00fcgelgen","norm_person":{"id":868,"first_name":"Anke von","last_name":"K\u00fcgelgen","full_name":"Anke von K\u00fcgelgen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/17274069X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/77007756","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Anke von K\u00fcgelgen"}}],"entry_title":"A Call for Rationalism. 'Arab Averroists' in the Twentieth Century","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A Call for Rationalism. 'Arab Averroists' in the Twentieth Century"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"}],"authors":[{"id":868,"full_name":"Anke von K\u00fcgelgen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1615,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Alif. Journal of Comparative Poetics","volume":"16","issue":null,"pages":"97\u2013132"}},"sort":["A Call for Rationalism. 'Arab Averroists' in the Twentieth Century"]}
| Title | A Case of "Author's Variant Readings" and the Textual History of Averroes' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2006 |
| Published in | Écriture et réécriture des textes philosophiques médiévaux. Volume d'hommage offert à Colette Sirat |
| Pages | 465–483 |
| Categories | Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Mauro Zonta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"609","_score":null,"_source":{"id":609,"authors_free":[{"id":760,"entry_id":609,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"A Case of \"Author's Variant Readings\" and the Textual History of Averroes' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics\n ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A Case of \"Author's Variant Readings\" and the Textual History of Averroes' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics\n "},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":609,"section_of":48,"pages":"465\u2013483","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":48,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"\u00c9criture et r\u00e9\u00e9criture des textes philosophiques m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux. Volume d'hommage offert \u00e0 Colette Sirat","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2006","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2006","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":48,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepols","series":"Textes et \u00e9tudes du moyen \u00e2ge","volume":"34","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A Case of \"Author's Variant Readings\" and the Textual History of Averroes' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics\n "]}
| Title | A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Metaphysics |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2013 |
| Publication Place | Leiden |
| Publisher | Brill Academic Publishers |
| Series | Brill's Companions to the Christian Tradition |
| Volume | 43 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Fabrizio Amerini , Gabriele Galluzzo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Few philosophical books have been so influential in the development of Western thought as Aristotle’s Metaphysics. For centuries Aristotle’s most celebrated work has been regarded as a source of inspiration as well as the starting point for every investigation into the structure of reality. Not surprisingly, the topics discussed in the book – the scientific status of ontology and metaphysics, the foundations of logical truths, the notions of essence and existence, the nature of material objects and their properties, the status of mathematical entities, just to mention some – are still at the centre of the current philosophical debate and are likely to excite philosophical minds for many years to come. This volume reconstructs in fourteen chapters a particular phase in the long history of the Metaphysics by focusing on the medieval reception of Aristotle’s masterpiece, specifically from its introduction in the Latin West in the twelfth through fifteenth centuries. Contributors include: Marta Borgo, Matteo di Giovanni, Amos Bertolacci, Silvia Donati, Gabriele Galluzzo, Alessandro D. Conti, Sten Ebbesen, Fabrizio Amerini, Giorgio Pini, Roberto Lambertini, William O. Duba, Femke J. Kok, and Paul J.J.M. Bakker. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"281","_score":null,"_source":{"id":281,"authors_free":[{"id":414,"entry_id":281,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":812,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","free_first_name":"Fabrizio","free_last_name":"Amerini","norm_person":{"id":812,"first_name":"Fabrizio","last_name":"Amerini","full_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1037880641","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61802005","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1037880641.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fabrizio Amerini"}},{"id":415,"entry_id":281,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1288,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","free_first_name":"Gabriele","free_last_name":"Galluzzo","norm_person":{"id":1288,"first_name":"Gabriele","last_name":"Galluzzo","full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1027244637","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61842398","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gabriele Galluzzo"}}],"entry_title":"A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Metaphysics"},"abstract":"Few philosophical books have been so influential in the development of Western thought as Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics. For centuries Aristotle\u2019s most celebrated work has been regarded as a source of inspiration as well as the starting point for every investigation into the structure of reality. Not surprisingly, the topics discussed in the book \u2013 the scientific status of ontology and metaphysics, the foundations of logical truths, the notions of essence and existence, the nature of material objects and their properties, the status of mathematical entities, just to mention some \u2013 are still at the centre of the current philosophical debate and are likely to excite philosophical minds for many years to come. This volume reconstructs in fourteen chapters a particular phase in the long history of the Metaphysics by focusing on the medieval reception of Aristotle\u2019s masterpiece, specifically from its introduction in the Latin West in the twelfth through fifteenth centuries.\r\n\r\nContributors include: Marta Borgo, Matteo di Giovanni, Amos Bertolacci, Silvia Donati, Gabriele Galluzzo, Alessandro D. Conti, Sten Ebbesen, Fabrizio Amerini, Giorgio Pini, Roberto Lambertini, William O. Duba, Femke J. Kok, and Paul J.J.M. Bakker. ","btype":4,"date":"2013","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004261297","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":812,"full_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","role":2},{"id":1288,"full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":281,"pubplace":"Leiden","publisher":"Brill Academic Publishers","series":"Brill's Companions to the Christian Tradition","volume":"43","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's Metaphysics"]}
| Title | A Comparative Study of Some Aspects of the Metaphysics of Aristotle and Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Dhaka University Studies: Journal of the Faculty of Arts |
| Volume | 51 |
| Pages | 113–126 |
| Categories | Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | A. Q. Fazlul Wahid |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"604","_score":null,"_source":{"id":604,"authors_free":[{"id":755,"entry_id":604,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":850,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"A. Q. Fazlul Wahid","free_first_name":"A. Q. Fazlul","free_last_name":"Wahid","norm_person":{"id":850,"first_name":"A. Q. Fazlul","last_name":"Wahid","full_name":"A. Q. Fazlul Wahid","short_ident":"AQFWah","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=A. Q. Fazlul Wahid"}}],"entry_title":"A Comparative Study of Some Aspects of the Metaphysics of Aristotle and Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A Comparative Study of Some Aspects of the Metaphysics of Aristotle and Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":850,"full_name":"A. Q. Fazlul Wahid","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":604,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dhaka University Studies: Journal of the Faculty of Arts","volume":"51","issue":null,"pages":"113\u2013126"}},"sort":["A Comparative Study of Some Aspects of the Metaphysics of Aristotle and Ibn Rushd"]}
| Title | A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Material and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes and Al-Farabi |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 39-41 |
| Categories | Psychology, De anima |
| Author(s) | Davoud Zandi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The relationship between the material intellect and the active intellect is an important issue in the realm of epistemology in Islamic philosophy. The aim of the present study is to compare the views of Averroes and Al-Farabi in this regard. Reviewing their theories, this study shows that both the mentioned philosophers agree upon the fact that the Active Intellect exists apart from human soul and acts as a creator of forms, but as for the relationship between the Material Intellect and the Active Intellect, there is disagreement between Averroes and Al-Farabi. Averroes believes that in some aspects both of them are the same yet they are different in some other aspects, namely regarding their acts they are different because the active intellect acts as creator of forms while the material intellect is just receiver of the forms. Nevertheless, they are the same, since the material intellect achieves perfection through the active intellect, whereas in Al-Farabi’s opinion, ontologically speaking; the material intellect and the active intellect are different in their existence. The material intellect in al-Farabi’s perspective is one of the stages of human intellect that is inherent in human soul, whereas the active intellect is an immaterial substance that exists apart from human soul. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5259","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5259,"authors_free":[{"id":6068,"entry_id":5259,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Davoud Zandi","free_first_name":"Davoud","free_last_name":"Zandi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Material and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes and Al-Farabi","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Material and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes and Al-Farabi"},"abstract":"The relationship between the material intellect and the active intellect is an important issue in the realm of epistemology in Islamic philosophy. The aim of the present study is to compare the views of Averroes and Al-Farabi in this regard. Reviewing their theories, this study shows that both the mentioned philosophers agree upon the fact that the Active Intellect exists apart from human soul and acts as a creator of forms, but as for the relationship between the Material Intellect and the Active Intellect, there is disagreement between Averroes and Al-Farabi. Averroes believes that in some aspects both of them are the same yet they are different in some other aspects, namely regarding their acts they are different because the active intellect acts as creator of forms while the material intellect is just receiver of the forms. Nevertheless, they are the same, since the material intellect achieves perfection through the active intellect, whereas in Al-Farabi\u2019s opinion, ontologically speaking; the material intellect and the active intellect are different in their existence. The material intellect in al-Farabi\u2019s perspective is one of the stages of human intellect that is inherent in human soul, whereas the active intellect is an immaterial substance that exists apart from human soul.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.15640\/jisc.v3n2a5 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5259,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"39-41"}},"sort":["A Comparative Study of the Relationship between the Material and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes and Al-Farabi"]}
| Title | A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Persian |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 69-84 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Averroism, Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Ali Ghorbani , Fath ali Akbari |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Faṣl al-maqāl, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5579","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5579,"authors_free":[{"id":6476,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Ghorbani","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Ghorbani","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6477,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fath ali Akbari","free_first_name":"Fath ali ","free_last_name":"Akbari","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"},"abstract":"In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Persian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5579,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"5","issue":"12","pages":"69-84"}},"sort":["A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"]}