{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5409","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5409,"authors_free":[{"id":6270,"entry_id":5409,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Emanuele Castrucci","free_first_name":"Emanuele","free_last_name":"Castrucci","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition"},"abstract":"A critique of the metaphysical concept of power and potency in the history of Western jurisprudence\r\n\r\nSweeping through the history of Western philosophy of law, Emanuele Castrucci deals with the metaphysical idea of potency as defined by Spinoza and Nietzsche, upsetting entrenched theories of jurisprudence.\r\n\r\nCastrucci first addresses how the idea of potency can change the meaning of the power ascribed to an omnipotent God. This brings together classical Greek philosophy with Jewish biblical exegesis, which Castrucci links through the juncture of Christianity. He then relates potency to the classical philosophical tradition in Aristotle's Metaphysics and its Arabic interpretations, particularly Ibn Rushd's (Averro\u00ebs). This leads us to the genesis of natural law theory in Western philosophy, from Augustine to Aquinas and from Duns Scotus to Ockham.\r\n\r\nMoving on, Castrucci examines the inherently problematic concept of political theology, pitting Spinozan\u2013Nietzschean potency against Kant and Enlightenment natural law to reveal the weaknesses inherent in the Enlightenment system. Finally, Castrucci applies the theories of Carl Schmitt to the philosophical rationalism of the Western tradition, showing us how it has failed to contain absolute power in a juridical sense.","btype":1,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781474411868","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5409,"pubplace":"Edinburgh ","publisher":"Edinburgh University Press","series":" Encounters in Law & Philosophy: ELP","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5078","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5078,"authors_free":[{"id":5839,"entry_id":5078,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jaan S. Islam","free_first_name":"Jaan S. ","free_last_name":"Islam","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"},"abstract":"This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the \u201cvirtuous society\u201d and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Shar\u012b\u2018a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between \u201creligious\u201d and \u201cpolitical\u201d (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5078,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"4","issue":"1","pages":"43\u201365"}},"sort":["The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"746","_score":null,"_source":{"id":746,"authors_free":[{"id":905,"entry_id":746,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":933,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Jainzik","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Jainzik","norm_person":{"id":933,"first_name":"Michael","last_name":"Jainzik","full_name":"Michael Jainzik","short_ident":"MicJai","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Michael Jainzik"}}],"entry_title":"Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":933,"full_name":"Michael Jainzik","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":746,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Concilium medii aevi. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Geschichte, Kunst und Kultur des Mittelalters und der Fr\u00fchen Neuzeit","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"143\u2013186"}},"sort":["Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat"]}