| Title | Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publication Place | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Categories | Aristotle, Thomas, Avicenna, De anima, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Stephen R. Ogden |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis—the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human beings. It focuses directly on Averroes’ arguments, both from the text of Aristotle’s De Anima and, more importantly, his own philosophical arguments in the Long Commentary on the De Anima. Ogden defends Averroes’ interpretation of Aristotle’s DA III.4–5 (using Greek, Arabic, Latin, and contemporary sources). Yet, the author insists that Averroes is not merely a “commentator” but also an incisive philosopher in his own right. Ogden thus reconstructs and analyzes Averroes’ two most significant independent philosophical arguments, the Determinate Particular Argument and the Unity Argument. Alternative ancient and medieval views are considered throughout, especially from two important foils before and after Averroes, namely Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā) and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s most famous and penetrating arguments against the unicity thesis are also addressed. Finally, Ogden considers Averroes’ own objections to broader metaphysical views of the soul such as Avicenna’s and Aquinas’s, which agree with him on several key points (e.g., the immateriality of the intellect and the individuation of human souls by matter), while still diverging on the number and substantial nature of the intellect. The central aim of the book is to provide readers a single study of Averroes’ most pivotal arguments on intellect, consolidating and building on recent scholarship and offering a comprehensive case for his unicity thesis in the wider context of Aristotelian epistemology and metaphysics. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5293","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5293,"authors_free":[{"id":6112,"entry_id":5293,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1681,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","free_first_name":"Stephen R.","free_last_name":"Ogden","norm_person":{"id":1681,"first_name":"Stephen R. ","last_name":"Ogden","full_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Stephen R. Ogden"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique"},"abstract":"This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis\u2014the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human beings. It focuses directly on Averroes\u2019 arguments, both from the text of Aristotle\u2019s De Anima and, more importantly, his own philosophical arguments in the Long Commentary on the De Anima. Ogden defends Averroes\u2019 interpretation of Aristotle\u2019s DA III.4\u20135 (using Greek, Arabic, Latin, and contemporary sources). Yet, the author insists that Averroes is not merely a \u201ccommentator\u201d but also an incisive philosopher in his own right. Ogden thus reconstructs and analyzes Averroes\u2019 two most significant independent philosophical arguments, the Determinate Particular Argument and the Unity Argument. Alternative ancient and medieval views are considered throughout, especially from two important foils before and after Averroes, namely Avicenna (Ibn S\u012bn\u0101) and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas\u2019s most famous and penetrating arguments against the unicity thesis are also addressed. Finally, Ogden considers Averroes\u2019 own objections to broader metaphysical views of the soul such as Avicenna\u2019s and Aquinas\u2019s, which agree with him on several key points (e.g., the immateriality of the intellect and the individuation of human souls by matter), while still diverging on the number and substantial nature of the intellect. The central aim of the book is to provide readers a single study of Averroes\u2019 most pivotal arguments on intellect, consolidating and building on recent scholarship and offering a comprehensive case for his unicity thesis in the wider context of Aristotelian epistemology and metaphysics.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1093\/oso\/9780192896117.001.0001","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1681,"full_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5293,"pubplace":"Oxford ","publisher":"Oxford University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiación aristotélico-averroísta |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 659–681 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Avicenna, Tradition and Reception, Latin Averroism, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Fernanda Ocampo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the ‘real distinction’ between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich’s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading – critical of that of Avicenna’s –, which “has made school” in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5060","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5060,"authors_free":[{"id":5813,"entry_id":5060,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fernanda Ocampo","free_first_name":"Fernanda ","free_last_name":"Ocampo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta"},"abstract":"The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the \u2018real distinction\u2019 between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich\u2019s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading \u2013 critical of that of Avicenna\u2019s \u2013, which \u201chas made school\u201d in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5209\/ashf.63089","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5060,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"36","issue":"3","pages":"659\u2013681"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Remarks on the Importance of Albert the Great’s Analyses and Use of the Thought of Avicenna and Averroes in the De homine for the Development of the Early Natural Epistemology of Thomas Aquinas |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2018 |
| Published in | Die Seele im Mittelalter. Von der Substanz zum funktionalen System |
| Pages | 131–148 |
| Categories | Albert, Avicenna, Thomas, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5166","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5166,"authors_free":[{"id":5950,"entry_id":5166,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Remarks on the Importance of Albert the Great\u2019s Analyses and Use of the Thought of Avicenna and Averroes in the De homine for the Development of the Early Natural Epistemology of Thomas Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Remarks on the Importance of Albert the Great\u2019s Analyses and Use of the Thought of Avicenna and Averroes in the De homine for the Development of the Early Natural Epistemology of Thomas Aquinas"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5166,"section_of":5165,"pages":"131\u2013148","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5165,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Die Seele im Mittelalter. Von der Substanz zum funktionalen System","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2018","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5165,"pubplace":"W\u00fcrzburg","publisher":"K\u00f6nigshausen & Neumann","series":"Contradictio","volume":"16","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2018 |
| Publication Place | London |
| Publisher | Bloomsbury Academy |
| Series | The Philosophy of Knowledge: A History |
| Volume | 2 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Buridan, Ockham, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Henrik Lagerlund |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy covers the development of philosophical treatments of knowledge during the Middle Ages. It covers both Arabic and Latin philosophy, as well as a range of thinkers from the period including Avicenna, Averroes, Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, William Ockham, and John Buridan. In addition, the volume explores the growth of epistemological scepticism and the subsequent claims made by a variety of philosophers that knowledge was no longer fallible. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5169","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5169,"authors_free":[{"id":5952,"entry_id":5169,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1317,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","free_first_name":"Henrik ","free_last_name":"Lagerlund","norm_person":{"id":1317,"first_name":"Henrik","last_name":"Lagerlund","full_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133619168","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/35317572","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd133619168.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Henrik Lagerlund"}}],"entry_title":"Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy"},"abstract":"Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy covers the development of philosophical treatments of knowledge during the Middle Ages. It covers both Arabic and Latin philosophy, as well as a range of thinkers from the period including Avicenna, Averroes, Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, William Ockham, and John Buridan. In addition, the volume explores the growth of epistemological scepticism and the subsequent claims made by a variety of philosophers that knowledge was no longer fallible. ","btype":4,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.5040\/9781474258340","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":64,"category_name":"Buridan","link":"bib?categories[]=Buridan"},{"id":3,"category_name":"Ockham","link":"bib?categories[]=Ockham"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1317,"full_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5169,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Bloomsbury Academy","series":"The Philosophy of Knowledge: A History","volume":"2","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | L’influsso di Avicenna ed Averroè nella metafisica di Tommaso d’Aquino |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2018 |
| Published in | Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale |
| Pages | 157–175 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Thomas, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Rafael Pascual |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5023","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5023,"authors_free":[{"id":5760,"entry_id":5023,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1686,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rafael Pascual","free_first_name":"Rafael","free_last_name":"Pascual","norm_person":{"id":1686,"first_name":"Rafael ","last_name":"Pascual","full_name":"Rafael Pascual","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rafael Pascual"}}],"entry_title":"L\u2019influsso di Avicenna ed Averro\u00e8 nella metafisica di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L\u2019influsso di Avicenna ed Averro\u00e8 nella metafisica di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2018","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1686,"full_name":"Rafael Pascual","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5023,"section_of":5022,"pages":"157\u2013175","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5022,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2018","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Il volume raccoglie gli Atti del convegno tenutosi a Gerusalemme, presso il Notre Dame of Jerusalem Center, nei giorni 6 e 7 dicembre 2010, a cura della Facolt\u00e0 di Filosofia dell\u2019Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum di Roma. Il convegno riguardava i rapporti tra fede e ragione nella Scolastica medievale ebraica, cristiana ed islamica. Sia quel convegno sia la presente raccolta degli Atti relativi si incastona all\u2019interno della Cattedra Marco Arosio di Alti Studi Medievali, la cui collaborazione al convegno poteva essere considerata il suo evento di partenza e di lancio. Ringraziamo vivamente tutti coloro che hanno contribuito alla realizzazione del convegno e del volume, particolarmente i Signori Franco ed Olimpia Arosio, genitori del compianto Marco, giovane e valente medievista, richiamato dal Padre a S\u00e9 nel 2009. In onore del Professore Marco Arosio questo volume ospita anche una sua relazione, da lui tenuta in un convegno medievista riunitosi in Assisi nel novembre del 1997. Il libro, curato da Carmelo Pandolfi e Rafael Pascual, presenta i contributi dei professori Carmelo Pandolfi, Guido Traversa, Renata Salvarani, Joan-Andreu Rocha Scarpetta, Graziano Perillo, Giovanni Boer, Rafael Pascual, Costantino Sigismondi e Marco Arosio (postumo).","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5022,"pubplace":"Rome","publisher":"Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum","series":"Ricerche di Storia della Filosofia e Teologia Medioevali ","volume":"10","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2018 |
| Publication Place | Rome |
| Publisher | Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum |
| Series | Ricerche di Storia della Filosofia e Teologia Medioevali |
| Volume | 10 |
| Categories | Maimonides, Thomas, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Carmelo Pandolfi , Rafael Pascual |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Il volume raccoglie gli Atti del convegno tenutosi a Gerusalemme, presso il Notre Dame of Jerusalem Center, nei giorni 6 e 7 dicembre 2010, a cura della Facoltà di Filosofia dell’Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum di Roma. Il convegno riguardava i rapporti tra fede e ragione nella Scolastica medievale ebraica, cristiana ed islamica. Sia quel convegno sia la presente raccolta degli Atti relativi si incastona all’interno della Cattedra Marco Arosio di Alti Studi Medievali, la cui collaborazione al convegno poteva essere considerata il suo evento di partenza e di lancio. Ringraziamo vivamente tutti coloro che hanno contribuito alla realizzazione del convegno e del volume, particolarmente i Signori Franco ed Olimpia Arosio, genitori del compianto Marco, giovane e valente medievista, richiamato dal Padre a Sé nel 2009. In onore del Professore Marco Arosio questo volume ospita anche una sua relazione, da lui tenuta in un convegno medievista riunitosi in Assisi nel novembre del 1997. Il libro, curato da Carmelo Pandolfi e Rafael Pascual, presenta i contributi dei professori Carmelo Pandolfi, Guido Traversa, Renata Salvarani, Joan-Andreu Rocha Scarpetta, Graziano Perillo, Giovanni Boer, Rafael Pascual, Costantino Sigismondi e Marco Arosio (postumo). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5022","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5022,"authors_free":[{"id":5758,"entry_id":5022,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Carmelo Pandolfi","free_first_name":"Carmelo ","free_last_name":" Pandolfi","norm_person":null},{"id":5759,"entry_id":5022,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Rafael Pascual ","free_first_name":"Rafael ","free_last_name":"Pascual ","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale"},"abstract":"Il volume raccoglie gli Atti del convegno tenutosi a Gerusalemme, presso il Notre Dame of Jerusalem Center, nei giorni 6 e 7 dicembre 2010, a cura della Facolt\u00e0 di Filosofia dell\u2019Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum di Roma. Il convegno riguardava i rapporti tra fede e ragione nella Scolastica medievale ebraica, cristiana ed islamica. Sia quel convegno sia la presente raccolta degli Atti relativi si incastona all\u2019interno della Cattedra Marco Arosio di Alti Studi Medievali, la cui collaborazione al convegno poteva essere considerata il suo evento di partenza e di lancio. Ringraziamo vivamente tutti coloro che hanno contribuito alla realizzazione del convegno e del volume, particolarmente i Signori Franco ed Olimpia Arosio, genitori del compianto Marco, giovane e valente medievista, richiamato dal Padre a S\u00e9 nel 2009. In onore del Professore Marco Arosio questo volume ospita anche una sua relazione, da lui tenuta in un convegno medievista riunitosi in Assisi nel novembre del 1997. Il libro, curato da Carmelo Pandolfi e Rafael Pascual, presenta i contributi dei professori Carmelo Pandolfi, Guido Traversa, Renata Salvarani, Joan-Andreu Rocha Scarpetta, Graziano Perillo, Giovanni Boer, Rafael Pascual, Costantino Sigismondi e Marco Arosio (postumo).","btype":4,"date":"2018","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5022,"pubplace":"Rome","publisher":"Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum","series":"Ricerche di Storia della Filosofia e Teologia Medioevali ","volume":"10","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion? |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Published in | Averroes’ Natural Philosophy and its Reception in the Latin West |
| Pages | 89–126 |
| Categories | Aristotle, De caelo, Physics, Avicenna, Albert, Thomas, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Silvia Donati |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5233","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5233,"authors_free":[{"id":6042,"entry_id":5233,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":897,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Donati","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Donati","norm_person":{"id":897,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Donati","full_name":"Silvia Donati","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1036991423","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54181913","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Silvia Donati"}}],"entry_title":"Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion?"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":66,"category_name":"De caelo","link":"bib?categories[]=De caelo"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":897,"full_name":"Silvia Donati","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5233,"section_of":5224,"pages":"89\u2013126","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5224,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Averroes\u2019 Natural Philosophy and its Reception in the Latin West","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2015","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5224,"pubplace":"Leuven","publisher":"Leuven University Press","series":"Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, De Wulf-Mansion Centre, Series 1","volume":"50","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | Between Avicenna and Averroes: Considerations on the Early Aquinas’ Aristotle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 26 |
| Pages | 211–240 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Aristotle, Thomas, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Marta Borgo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5268","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5268,"authors_free":[{"id":6082,"entry_id":5268,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Marta Borgo","free_first_name":"Marta","free_last_name":"Borgo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Between Avicenna and Averroes: Considerations on the Early Aquinas\u2019 Aristotle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Between Avicenna and Averroes: Considerations on the Early Aquinas\u2019 Aristotle"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5268,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"26","issue":"","pages":"211\u2013240"}},"sort":[2015]}
| The thesis of this paper is that Thomas Aquinas offers an alternative model of abstraction (the Active Principle Model) that overcomes the standard objections to abstractionism and expands our view of what an abstractionist theory might look like. I contend that this alternative model of abstraction has been invisible in plain sight, in Aquinas’s references to the mind’s abstractive mechanism as an “intellectual light.” Such language is not metaphorical but rather technical, signaling that intellectual abstraction is to be modeled on the activity of physical light as he understood it from theories proposed by Avicenna and Averroes. The Active Principle Model requires us to rethink Aquinas’s account of how we come to know essences—a process that turns out to be much more tentative and incremental than previously thought. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5276","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5276,"authors_free":[{"id":6092,"entry_id":5276,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","free_first_name":"Therese Scarpelli ","free_last_name":"Cory","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Rethinking Abstractionism: Aquinas\u2019s Intellectual Light and Some Arabic Sources","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Rethinking Abstractionism: Aquinas\u2019s Intellectual Light and Some Arabic Sources"},"abstract":"The thesis of this paper is that Thomas Aquinas offers an alternative model of abstraction (the Active Principle Model) that overcomes the standard objections to abstractionism and expands our view of what an abstractionist theory might look like. I contend that this alternative model of abstraction has been invisible in plain sight, in Aquinas\u2019s references to the mind\u2019s abstractive mechanism as an \u201cintellectual light.\u201d Such language is not metaphorical but rather technical, signaling that intellectual abstraction is to be modeled on the activity of physical light as he understood it from theories proposed by Avicenna and Averroes. The Active Principle Model requires us to rethink Aquinas\u2019s account of how we come to know essences\u2014a process that turns out to be much more tentative and incremental than previously thought.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1353\/hph.2015.0074","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5276,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Philosophy","volume":"53","issue":"4","pages":"607\u2013646"}},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 307–337 |
| Categories | Thomas, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Avicenna's philosophy had a strong impact on many aspects of Thomas Aquinas' thought: Aquinas' early doctrine of creation is no exception to this. The present paper shows how the young Aquinas appeals to Avicenna's metaphysics while formulating a novel view on the topic of the creation of the world, a view diverging significantly from those of such contemporaries as Bonaventure and Albert the Great. After a brief historical introduction to the various argumentative strategies concerning the creation of the world, the discussion turns to an analysis of Aquinas' treatment in In II Sent. d. 1, q. 1, a. 2. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1879","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1879,"authors_free":[{"id":2251,"entry_id":1879,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2"},"abstract":"Avicenna's philosophy had a strong impact on many aspects of Thomas Aquinas' thought: Aquinas' early doctrine of creation is no exception to this. The present paper shows how the young Aquinas appeals to Avicenna's metaphysics while formulating a novel view on the topic of the creation of the world, a view diverging significantly from those of such contemporaries as Bonaventure and Albert the Great. After a brief historical introduction to the various argumentative strategies concerning the creation of the world, the discussion turns to an analysis of Aquinas' treatment in In II Sent. d. 1, q. 1, a. 2.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1879,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de Th\u00e9ologie et Philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"79","issue":"2","pages":"307\u2013337"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publication Place | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Categories | Aristotle, Thomas, Avicenna, De anima, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Stephen R. Ogden |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis—the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human beings. It focuses directly on Averroes’ arguments, both from the text of Aristotle’s De Anima and, more importantly, his own philosophical arguments in the Long Commentary on the De Anima. Ogden defends Averroes’ interpretation of Aristotle’s DA III.4–5 (using Greek, Arabic, Latin, and contemporary sources). Yet, the author insists that Averroes is not merely a “commentator” but also an incisive philosopher in his own right. Ogden thus reconstructs and analyzes Averroes’ two most significant independent philosophical arguments, the Determinate Particular Argument and the Unity Argument. Alternative ancient and medieval views are considered throughout, especially from two important foils before and after Averroes, namely Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā) and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s most famous and penetrating arguments against the unicity thesis are also addressed. Finally, Ogden considers Averroes’ own objections to broader metaphysical views of the soul such as Avicenna’s and Aquinas’s, which agree with him on several key points (e.g., the immateriality of the intellect and the individuation of human souls by matter), while still diverging on the number and substantial nature of the intellect. The central aim of the book is to provide readers a single study of Averroes’ most pivotal arguments on intellect, consolidating and building on recent scholarship and offering a comprehensive case for his unicity thesis in the wider context of Aristotelian epistemology and metaphysics. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5293","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5293,"authors_free":[{"id":6112,"entry_id":5293,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1681,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","free_first_name":"Stephen R.","free_last_name":"Ogden","norm_person":{"id":1681,"first_name":"Stephen R. ","last_name":"Ogden","full_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Stephen R. Ogden"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique"},"abstract":"This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis\u2014the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human beings. It focuses directly on Averroes\u2019 arguments, both from the text of Aristotle\u2019s De Anima and, more importantly, his own philosophical arguments in the Long Commentary on the De Anima. Ogden defends Averroes\u2019 interpretation of Aristotle\u2019s DA III.4\u20135 (using Greek, Arabic, Latin, and contemporary sources). Yet, the author insists that Averroes is not merely a \u201ccommentator\u201d but also an incisive philosopher in his own right. Ogden thus reconstructs and analyzes Averroes\u2019 two most significant independent philosophical arguments, the Determinate Particular Argument and the Unity Argument. Alternative ancient and medieval views are considered throughout, especially from two important foils before and after Averroes, namely Avicenna (Ibn S\u012bn\u0101) and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas\u2019s most famous and penetrating arguments against the unicity thesis are also addressed. Finally, Ogden considers Averroes\u2019 own objections to broader metaphysical views of the soul such as Avicenna\u2019s and Aquinas\u2019s, which agree with him on several key points (e.g., the immateriality of the intellect and the individuation of human souls by matter), while still diverging on the number and substantial nature of the intellect. The central aim of the book is to provide readers a single study of Averroes\u2019 most pivotal arguments on intellect, consolidating and building on recent scholarship and offering a comprehensive case for his unicity thesis in the wider context of Aristotelian epistemology and metaphysics.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1093\/oso\/9780192896117.001.0001","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1681,"full_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5293,"pubplace":"Oxford ","publisher":"Oxford University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique"]}
| Title | Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 307–337 |
| Categories | Thomas, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Avicenna's philosophy had a strong impact on many aspects of Thomas Aquinas' thought: Aquinas' early doctrine of creation is no exception to this. The present paper shows how the young Aquinas appeals to Avicenna's metaphysics while formulating a novel view on the topic of the creation of the world, a view diverging significantly from those of such contemporaries as Bonaventure and Albert the Great. After a brief historical introduction to the various argumentative strategies concerning the creation of the world, the discussion turns to an analysis of Aquinas' treatment in In II Sent. d. 1, q. 1, a. 2. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1879","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1879,"authors_free":[{"id":2251,"entry_id":1879,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2"},"abstract":"Avicenna's philosophy had a strong impact on many aspects of Thomas Aquinas' thought: Aquinas' early doctrine of creation is no exception to this. The present paper shows how the young Aquinas appeals to Avicenna's metaphysics while formulating a novel view on the topic of the creation of the world, a view diverging significantly from those of such contemporaries as Bonaventure and Albert the Great. After a brief historical introduction to the various argumentative strategies concerning the creation of the world, the discussion turns to an analysis of Aquinas' treatment in In II Sent. d. 1, q. 1, a. 2.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1879,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de Th\u00e9ologie et Philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"79","issue":"2","pages":"307\u2013337"}},"sort":["Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2"]}
| Title | Between Avicenna and Averroes: Considerations on the Early Aquinas’ Aristotle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 26 |
| Pages | 211–240 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Aristotle, Thomas, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Marta Borgo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5268","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5268,"authors_free":[{"id":6082,"entry_id":5268,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Marta Borgo","free_first_name":"Marta","free_last_name":"Borgo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Between Avicenna and Averroes: Considerations on the Early Aquinas\u2019 Aristotle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Between Avicenna and Averroes: Considerations on the Early Aquinas\u2019 Aristotle"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5268,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"26","issue":"","pages":"211\u2013240"}},"sort":["Between Avicenna and Averroes: Considerations on the Early Aquinas\u2019 Aristotle"]}
| Title | Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2018 |
| Publication Place | Rome |
| Publisher | Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum |
| Series | Ricerche di Storia della Filosofia e Teologia Medioevali |
| Volume | 10 |
| Categories | Maimonides, Thomas, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Carmelo Pandolfi , Rafael Pascual |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Il volume raccoglie gli Atti del convegno tenutosi a Gerusalemme, presso il Notre Dame of Jerusalem Center, nei giorni 6 e 7 dicembre 2010, a cura della Facoltà di Filosofia dell’Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum di Roma. Il convegno riguardava i rapporti tra fede e ragione nella Scolastica medievale ebraica, cristiana ed islamica. Sia quel convegno sia la presente raccolta degli Atti relativi si incastona all’interno della Cattedra Marco Arosio di Alti Studi Medievali, la cui collaborazione al convegno poteva essere considerata il suo evento di partenza e di lancio. Ringraziamo vivamente tutti coloro che hanno contribuito alla realizzazione del convegno e del volume, particolarmente i Signori Franco ed Olimpia Arosio, genitori del compianto Marco, giovane e valente medievista, richiamato dal Padre a Sé nel 2009. In onore del Professore Marco Arosio questo volume ospita anche una sua relazione, da lui tenuta in un convegno medievista riunitosi in Assisi nel novembre del 1997. Il libro, curato da Carmelo Pandolfi e Rafael Pascual, presenta i contributi dei professori Carmelo Pandolfi, Guido Traversa, Renata Salvarani, Joan-Andreu Rocha Scarpetta, Graziano Perillo, Giovanni Boer, Rafael Pascual, Costantino Sigismondi e Marco Arosio (postumo). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5022","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5022,"authors_free":[{"id":5758,"entry_id":5022,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Carmelo Pandolfi","free_first_name":"Carmelo ","free_last_name":" Pandolfi","norm_person":null},{"id":5759,"entry_id":5022,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Rafael Pascual ","free_first_name":"Rafael ","free_last_name":"Pascual ","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale"},"abstract":"Il volume raccoglie gli Atti del convegno tenutosi a Gerusalemme, presso il Notre Dame of Jerusalem Center, nei giorni 6 e 7 dicembre 2010, a cura della Facolt\u00e0 di Filosofia dell\u2019Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum di Roma. Il convegno riguardava i rapporti tra fede e ragione nella Scolastica medievale ebraica, cristiana ed islamica. Sia quel convegno sia la presente raccolta degli Atti relativi si incastona all\u2019interno della Cattedra Marco Arosio di Alti Studi Medievali, la cui collaborazione al convegno poteva essere considerata il suo evento di partenza e di lancio. Ringraziamo vivamente tutti coloro che hanno contribuito alla realizzazione del convegno e del volume, particolarmente i Signori Franco ed Olimpia Arosio, genitori del compianto Marco, giovane e valente medievista, richiamato dal Padre a S\u00e9 nel 2009. In onore del Professore Marco Arosio questo volume ospita anche una sua relazione, da lui tenuta in un convegno medievista riunitosi in Assisi nel novembre del 1997. Il libro, curato da Carmelo Pandolfi e Rafael Pascual, presenta i contributi dei professori Carmelo Pandolfi, Guido Traversa, Renata Salvarani, Joan-Andreu Rocha Scarpetta, Graziano Perillo, Giovanni Boer, Rafael Pascual, Costantino Sigismondi e Marco Arosio (postumo).","btype":4,"date":"2018","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5022,"pubplace":"Rome","publisher":"Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum","series":"Ricerche di Storia della Filosofia e Teologia Medioevali ","volume":"10","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale"]}
| Title | Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion? |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Published in | Averroes’ Natural Philosophy and its Reception in the Latin West |
| Pages | 89–126 |
| Categories | Aristotle, De caelo, Physics, Avicenna, Albert, Thomas, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Silvia Donati |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5233","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5233,"authors_free":[{"id":6042,"entry_id":5233,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":897,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Donati","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Donati","norm_person":{"id":897,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Donati","full_name":"Silvia Donati","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1036991423","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54181913","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Silvia Donati"}}],"entry_title":"Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion?"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":66,"category_name":"De caelo","link":"bib?categories[]=De caelo"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":897,"full_name":"Silvia Donati","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5233,"section_of":5224,"pages":"89\u2013126","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5224,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Averroes\u2019 Natural Philosophy and its Reception in the Latin West","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2015","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5224,"pubplace":"Leuven","publisher":"Leuven University Press","series":"Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, De Wulf-Mansion Centre, Series 1","volume":"50","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion?"]}
| Title | Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2018 |
| Publication Place | London |
| Publisher | Bloomsbury Academy |
| Series | The Philosophy of Knowledge: A History |
| Volume | 2 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Buridan, Ockham, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Henrik Lagerlund |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy covers the development of philosophical treatments of knowledge during the Middle Ages. It covers both Arabic and Latin philosophy, as well as a range of thinkers from the period including Avicenna, Averroes, Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, William Ockham, and John Buridan. In addition, the volume explores the growth of epistemological scepticism and the subsequent claims made by a variety of philosophers that knowledge was no longer fallible. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5169","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5169,"authors_free":[{"id":5952,"entry_id":5169,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1317,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","free_first_name":"Henrik ","free_last_name":"Lagerlund","norm_person":{"id":1317,"first_name":"Henrik","last_name":"Lagerlund","full_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133619168","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/35317572","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd133619168.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Henrik Lagerlund"}}],"entry_title":"Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy"},"abstract":"Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy covers the development of philosophical treatments of knowledge during the Middle Ages. It covers both Arabic and Latin philosophy, as well as a range of thinkers from the period including Avicenna, Averroes, Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, William Ockham, and John Buridan. In addition, the volume explores the growth of epistemological scepticism and the subsequent claims made by a variety of philosophers that knowledge was no longer fallible. ","btype":4,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.5040\/9781474258340","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":64,"category_name":"Buridan","link":"bib?categories[]=Buridan"},{"id":3,"category_name":"Ockham","link":"bib?categories[]=Ockham"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1317,"full_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5169,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Bloomsbury Academy","series":"The Philosophy of Knowledge: A History","volume":"2","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Knowledge in Medieval Philosophy"]}
| Title | La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiación aristotélico-averroísta |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 659–681 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Avicenna, Tradition and Reception, Latin Averroism, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Fernanda Ocampo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the ‘real distinction’ between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich’s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading – critical of that of Avicenna’s –, which “has made school” in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5060","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5060,"authors_free":[{"id":5813,"entry_id":5060,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fernanda Ocampo","free_first_name":"Fernanda ","free_last_name":"Ocampo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta"},"abstract":"The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the \u2018real distinction\u2019 between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich\u2019s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading \u2013 critical of that of Avicenna\u2019s \u2013, which \u201chas made school\u201d in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5209\/ashf.63089","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5060,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"36","issue":"3","pages":"659\u2013681"}},"sort":["La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta"]}
| Title | L’influsso di Avicenna ed Averroè nella metafisica di Tommaso d’Aquino |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2018 |
| Published in | Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale |
| Pages | 157–175 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Thomas, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Rafael Pascual |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5023","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5023,"authors_free":[{"id":5760,"entry_id":5023,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1686,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rafael Pascual","free_first_name":"Rafael","free_last_name":"Pascual","norm_person":{"id":1686,"first_name":"Rafael ","last_name":"Pascual","full_name":"Rafael Pascual","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rafael Pascual"}}],"entry_title":"L\u2019influsso di Avicenna ed Averro\u00e8 nella metafisica di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L\u2019influsso di Avicenna ed Averro\u00e8 nella metafisica di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2018","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1686,"full_name":"Rafael Pascual","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5023,"section_of":5022,"pages":"157\u2013175","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5022,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Il rapporto fede-ragione nel pensiero ebraico-cristiano-islamico medievale","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2018","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Il volume raccoglie gli Atti del convegno tenutosi a Gerusalemme, presso il Notre Dame of Jerusalem Center, nei giorni 6 e 7 dicembre 2010, a cura della Facolt\u00e0 di Filosofia dell\u2019Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum di Roma. Il convegno riguardava i rapporti tra fede e ragione nella Scolastica medievale ebraica, cristiana ed islamica. Sia quel convegno sia la presente raccolta degli Atti relativi si incastona all\u2019interno della Cattedra Marco Arosio di Alti Studi Medievali, la cui collaborazione al convegno poteva essere considerata il suo evento di partenza e di lancio. Ringraziamo vivamente tutti coloro che hanno contribuito alla realizzazione del convegno e del volume, particolarmente i Signori Franco ed Olimpia Arosio, genitori del compianto Marco, giovane e valente medievista, richiamato dal Padre a S\u00e9 nel 2009. In onore del Professore Marco Arosio questo volume ospita anche una sua relazione, da lui tenuta in un convegno medievista riunitosi in Assisi nel novembre del 1997. Il libro, curato da Carmelo Pandolfi e Rafael Pascual, presenta i contributi dei professori Carmelo Pandolfi, Guido Traversa, Renata Salvarani, Joan-Andreu Rocha Scarpetta, Graziano Perillo, Giovanni Boer, Rafael Pascual, Costantino Sigismondi e Marco Arosio (postumo).","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5022,"pubplace":"Rome","publisher":"Ateneo Pontificio Regina Apostolorum","series":"Ricerche di Storia della Filosofia e Teologia Medioevali ","volume":"10","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["L\u2019influsso di Avicenna ed Averro\u00e8 nella metafisica di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino"]}
| Title | Remarks on the Importance of Albert the Great’s Analyses and Use of the Thought of Avicenna and Averroes in the De homine for the Development of the Early Natural Epistemology of Thomas Aquinas |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2018 |
| Published in | Die Seele im Mittelalter. Von der Substanz zum funktionalen System |
| Pages | 131–148 |
| Categories | Albert, Avicenna, Thomas, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5166","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5166,"authors_free":[{"id":5950,"entry_id":5166,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Remarks on the Importance of Albert the Great\u2019s Analyses and Use of the Thought of Avicenna and Averroes in the De homine for the Development of the Early Natural Epistemology of Thomas Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Remarks on the Importance of Albert the Great\u2019s Analyses and Use of the Thought of Avicenna and Averroes in the De homine for the Development of the Early Natural Epistemology of Thomas Aquinas"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5166,"section_of":5165,"pages":"131\u2013148","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5165,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Die Seele im Mittelalter. Von der Substanz zum funktionalen System","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2018","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5165,"pubplace":"W\u00fcrzburg","publisher":"K\u00f6nigshausen & Neumann","series":"Contradictio","volume":"16","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Remarks on the Importance of Albert the Great\u2019s Analyses and Use of the Thought of Avicenna and Averroes in the De homine for the Development of the Early Natural Epistemology of Thomas Aquinas"]}
| The thesis of this paper is that Thomas Aquinas offers an alternative model of abstraction (the Active Principle Model) that overcomes the standard objections to abstractionism and expands our view of what an abstractionist theory might look like. I contend that this alternative model of abstraction has been invisible in plain sight, in Aquinas’s references to the mind’s abstractive mechanism as an “intellectual light.” Such language is not metaphorical but rather technical, signaling that intellectual abstraction is to be modeled on the activity of physical light as he understood it from theories proposed by Avicenna and Averroes. The Active Principle Model requires us to rethink Aquinas’s account of how we come to know essences—a process that turns out to be much more tentative and incremental than previously thought. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5276","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5276,"authors_free":[{"id":6092,"entry_id":5276,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","free_first_name":"Therese Scarpelli ","free_last_name":"Cory","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Rethinking Abstractionism: Aquinas\u2019s Intellectual Light and Some Arabic Sources","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Rethinking Abstractionism: Aquinas\u2019s Intellectual Light and Some Arabic Sources"},"abstract":"The thesis of this paper is that Thomas Aquinas offers an alternative model of abstraction (the Active Principle Model) that overcomes the standard objections to abstractionism and expands our view of what an abstractionist theory might look like. I contend that this alternative model of abstraction has been invisible in plain sight, in Aquinas\u2019s references to the mind\u2019s abstractive mechanism as an \u201cintellectual light.\u201d Such language is not metaphorical but rather technical, signaling that intellectual abstraction is to be modeled on the activity of physical light as he understood it from theories proposed by Avicenna and Averroes. The Active Principle Model requires us to rethink Aquinas\u2019s account of how we come to know essences\u2014a process that turns out to be much more tentative and incremental than previously thought.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1353\/hph.2015.0074","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5276,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Philosophy","volume":"53","issue":"4","pages":"607\u2013646"}},"sort":["Rethinking Abstractionism: Aquinas\u2019s Intellectual Light and Some Arabic Sources"]}