Yaḥyá ibn ʿAdī and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton, 2010
By: Peter Adamson
Title Yaḥyá ibn ʿAdī and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton
Type Article
Language English
Date 2010
Journal Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale
Volume 21
Pages 343–374
Categories Metaphysics, Commentary
Author(s) Peter Adamson
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This paper examines and compares two commentaries on Aristotle Metaphyics, Alpha Elatton. In the Arabic tradition this was considered to be the first book of the Metaphysics, and it accordingly acquired more importance than it is usually given today. After giving a brief resume of Elatton and its transmission into Arabic, the paper discusses the commentaries of Yaḥyá ibn ʿAdī, a Christian commentator of the Baghdad School, and by Averroes. it is argued that these two commentaries show rather different conceptions of Elatton as a text, and metaphysics as a science. In the final section Averroes' commentary on Elatton is shown to resonate strongly with Averroes' famous Decisive Treatise. Concluding remarks consider the question of how Averroes' project as a commentator related to that of the Baghdad School.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1537","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1537,"authors_free":[{"id":1764,"entry_id":1537,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}}],"entry_title":"Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton"},"abstract":"This paper examines and compares two commentaries on Aristotle Metaphyics, Alpha Elatton. In the Arabic tradition this was considered to be the first book of the Metaphysics, and it accordingly acquired more importance than it is usually given today. After giving a brief resume of Elatton and its transmission into Arabic, the paper discusses the commentaries of Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b, a Christian commentator of the Baghdad School, and by Averroes. it is argued that these two commentaries show rather different conceptions of Elatton as a text, and metaphysics as a science. In the final section Averroes' commentary on Elatton is shown to resonate strongly with Averroes' famous Decisive Treatise. Concluding remarks consider the question of how Averroes' project as a commentator related to that of the Baghdad School.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1537,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"21","issue":null,"pages":"343\u2013374"}},"sort":[2010]}

Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averroès à Phys. I, 1, 2009
By: Cristina Cerami
Title Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averroès à Phys. I, 1
Type Article
Language French
Date 2009
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 19
Issue 2
Pages 189–223
Categories Thomas, Commentary, Physics, Tradition and Reception
Author(s) Cristina Cerami
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1382","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1382,"authors_free":[{"id":1574,"entry_id":1382,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1"},"abstract":"The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1382,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"189\u2013223"}},"sort":[2009]}

Fragmentos del gran comentario de Averroes a la Física, 2009
By: Josep Puig Montada
Title Fragmentos del gran comentario de Averroes a la Física
Translation Fragments from Averroes' long commentary on the Physics
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2009
Journal Al-Qanṭara
Volume 30
Issue 1
Pages 69–81
Categories Physics, Commentary, Transmission
Author(s) Josep Puig Montada
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The Arabic manuscript 5000 of the National Library in Madrid contains Averroes' epitomes or short commentaries on various works of Aristotle. Annotations written on the margins of the short commentary on the Physics appear to be fragments of the long commentary on this work of Aristotle. The article focuses on the fragments because they are the only evidence of the Arabic original. Further, the article considers notes written by the successive owners of the manuscript: some are written in Arabic and in Arabic letters, others in Arabic and Hebrew letters (some words are also in Hebrew) and others are written in Vulgar Latin, either in Hebrew or Latin letters.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1400","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1400,"authors_free":[{"id":1593,"entry_id":1400,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Fragmentos del gran comentario de Averroes a la F\u00edsica","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":"Fragments from Averroes' long commentary on the Physics","main_title":{"title":"Fragmentos del gran comentario de Averroes a la F\u00edsica"},"abstract":"The Arabic manuscript 5000 of the National Library in Madrid contains Averroes' epitomes or short commentaries on various works of Aristotle. Annotations written on the margins of the short commentary on the Physics appear to be fragments of the long commentary on this work of Aristotle. The article focuses on the fragments because they are the only evidence of the Arabic original. Further, the article considers notes written by the successive owners of the manuscript: some are written in Arabic and in Arabic letters, others in Arabic and Hebrew letters (some words are also in Hebrew) and others are written in Vulgar Latin, either in Hebrew or Latin letters.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1400,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qan\u1e6dara","volume":"30","issue":"1","pages":"69\u201381"}},"sort":[2009]}

Le commentaire par Averroès du chapitre 9 du livre X de l'Éthique à Nicomaque. Pédagogie de la contrainte, habitudes et lois, 2009
By: Maroun Aouad, Frédérique Woerther
Title Le commentaire par Averroès du chapitre 9 du livre X de l'Éthique à Nicomaque. Pédagogie de la contrainte, habitudes et lois
Type Article
Language French
Date 2009
Journal Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph
Volume 62
Pages 353–380
Categories Ethics, Commentary
Author(s) Maroun Aouad , Frédérique Woerther
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Le texte arabe n'étant pas conservé, les notions en question sont étudiées à partir des versions hébraïque et latin, cette dernière datée de 1260 [p. 367, 378, ou «1240», p. 354 et 355], conservée dans treize mss et treize fois éditée entre 1483 et 1575; on y distingue trois rédactions, la première elle-même connaissant deux versions dont la seconde, celle de deux mss et de l'éd. de 1483, procéderait d'une révision sur le texte arabe postérieure à Hermann; la deuxième rédaction a connu une division en chapitres entièrement nouvelle et des améliorations philologiques sans recours à l'arabe; la troisième rédaction, dépendant de la seconde version de la première rédaction, se trouve dans des éditions du XVIe s. On transcrit ici, p. 362–367, corrigé au besoin sur l'éd. de 1483, et l'on traduit en français, p. 368–378, le texte de l'éd. de Venise, Junte, 1562, réimpr. Francfort 1962, remontant elle aussi à la réd. I, version 2, selon J. B. Korolec, «Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethic des Aristoteles», Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum 31, 1992, p. 61–118

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1459","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1459,"authors_free":[{"id":1661,"entry_id":1459,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1052,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Maroun Aouad","free_first_name":"Maroun","free_last_name":"Aouad","norm_person":{"id":1052,"first_name":"Maroun","last_name":"Aouad","full_name":"Maroun Aouad","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/157523497","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5071598","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Maroun Aouad"}},{"id":1662,"entry_id":1459,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"Le commentaire par Averro\u00e8s du chapitre 9 du livre X de l'\u00c9thique \u00e0 Nicomaque. P\u00e9dagogie de la contrainte, habitudes et lois","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Le commentaire par Averro\u00e8s du chapitre 9 du livre X de l'\u00c9thique \u00e0 Nicomaque. P\u00e9dagogie de la contrainte, habitudes et lois"},"abstract":"Le texte arabe n'\u00e9tant pas conserv\u00e9, les notions en question sont \u00e9tudi\u00e9es \u00e0 partir des versions h\u00e9bra\u00efque et latin, cette derni\u00e8re dat\u00e9e de 1260 [p. 367, 378, ou \u00ab1240\u00bb, p. 354 et 355], conserv\u00e9e dans treize mss et treize fois \u00e9dit\u00e9e entre 1483 et 1575; on y distingue trois r\u00e9dactions, la premi\u00e8re elle-m\u00eame connaissant deux versions dont la seconde, celle de deux mss et de l'\u00e9d. de 1483, proc\u00e9derait d'une r\u00e9vision sur le texte arabe post\u00e9rieure \u00e0 Hermann; la deuxi\u00e8me r\u00e9daction a connu une division en chapitres enti\u00e8rement nouvelle et des am\u00e9liorations philologiques sans recours \u00e0 l'arabe; la troisi\u00e8me r\u00e9daction, d\u00e9pendant de la seconde version de la premi\u00e8re r\u00e9daction, se trouve dans des \u00e9ditions du XVIe s. On transcrit ici, p. 362\u2013367, corrig\u00e9 au besoin sur l'\u00e9d. de 1483, et l'on traduit en fran\u00e7ais, p. 368\u2013378, le texte de l'\u00e9d. de Venise, Junte, 1562, r\u00e9impr. Francfort 1962, remontant elle aussi \u00e0 la r\u00e9d. I, version 2, selon J. B. Korolec, \u00abMittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethic des Aristoteles\u00bb, Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum 31, 1992, p. 61\u2013118","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1052,"full_name":"Maroun Aouad","role":1},{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1459,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"62","issue":null,"pages":"353\u2013380"}},"sort":[2009]}

Generazione verticale, generazione orizzontale: il principio di sinonimia nel Commento grande di Averroè al Libro Z della Metafisica di Aristotle, 2009
By: Cristina Cerami
Title Generazione verticale, generazione orizzontale: il principio di sinonimia nel Commento grande di Averroè al Libro Z della Metafisica di Aristotle
Type Article
Language Italian
Date 2009
Journal Chôra. Revue d’Études anciennes et médiévales
Volume 7-8
Issue 2009-2010
Pages 133-62
Categories Commentary, Aristotle, Metaphysics, Avicenna
Author(s) Cristina Cerami
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Le but de cet article est d’analyser l’interprétation qu’Averroès propose de l’étude de la génération spontanée développée par Aristote dans le chapitre 9 du livre Z de la Métaphysique et montrer que pour Averroès le véritable enjeu de cette étude est celui de démontrer que l’agent et le produit de la génération ont une même forme. C’est cette thèse, en effet, qui d’après le Cordouan permet en dernière instance d’instaurer entre le monde céleste et le monde terrestre une causalité, pour ainsi dire, «perpendiculaire» qui sauve à la fois l’efficacité des causes secondes et celle de la cause première qui agit par l’intermédiaire des causes célestes. Ce nouveau cadre cosmologico-ontologique apparaît manifestement comme le produit d’une stratégie menée directement contre Avicenne, car le but ultime d’Averroès est de substituer sa propre théorie de l’Artisan divin à la théorie platonicienne de la création démiurgique, à laquelle il assimile la théorie avicennienne d’une donation des formes par une Intelligence cosmique.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5338","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5338,"authors_free":[{"id":6184,"entry_id":5338,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Generazione verticale, generazione orizzontale: il principio di sinonimia nel Commento grande di Averro\u00e8 al Libro Z della Metafisica di Aristotle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Generazione verticale, generazione orizzontale: il principio di sinonimia nel Commento grande di Averro\u00e8 al Libro Z della Metafisica di Aristotle"},"abstract":"Le but de cet article est d\u2019analyser l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation qu\u2019Averro\u00e8s propose de l\u2019\u00e9tude de la g\u00e9n\u00e9ration spontan\u00e9e d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e par Aristote dans le chapitre 9 du livre Z de la M\u00e9taphysique et montrer que pour Averro\u00e8s le v\u00e9ritable enjeu de cette \u00e9tude est celui de d\u00e9montrer que l\u2019agent et le produit de la g\u00e9n\u00e9ration ont une m\u00eame forme. C\u2019est cette th\u00e8se, en effet, qui d\u2019apr\u00e8s le Cordouan permet en derni\u00e8re instance d\u2019instaurer entre le monde c\u00e9leste et le monde terrestre une causalit\u00e9, pour ainsi dire, \u00abperpendiculaire\u00bb qui sauve \u00e0 la fois l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 des causes secondes et celle de la cause premi\u00e8re qui agit par l\u2019interm\u00e9diaire des causes c\u00e9lestes. Ce nouveau cadre cosmologico-ontologique appara\u00eet manifestement comme le produit d\u2019une strat\u00e9gie men\u00e9e directement contre Avicenne, car le but ultime d\u2019Averro\u00e8s est de substituer sa propre th\u00e9orie de l\u2019Artisan divin \u00e0 la th\u00e9orie platonicienne de la cr\u00e9ation d\u00e9miurgique, \u00e0 laquelle il assimile la th\u00e9orie avicennienne d\u2019une donation des formes par une Intelligence cosmique.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5338,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ch\u00f4ra. Revue d\u2019\u00c9tudes anciennes et m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":" 7-8","issue":"2009-2010","pages":"133-62"}},"sort":[2009]}

Boèce, Averroès et Abū al-Barakāt al-Baġdādī. Témoins des écrits de Thémistius sur les Topiques d'Aristote, 2007
By: Ahmad Hasnawi
Title Boèce, Averroès et Abū al-Barakāt al-Baġdādī. Témoins des écrits de Thémistius sur les Topiques d'Aristote
Type Article
Language French
Date 2007
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 17
Issue 2
Pages 203–265
Categories Transmission, Commentary, Themistius, Logic, Aristotle
Author(s) Ahmad Hasnawi
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Aristotle's Topics, and especially, as far as the subject of this study is concerned, their central books (II-VII), played a role of central importance both in the medieval Latin and in the Arabic logical tradition. This did not occur without transformations, which affected the nature and the function of the loci of which these books set forth the theory. One of the most visible signposts of this tradition of re-elaboration of the Topics is represented by Themistius (ob. c. 388), to whom both Boethius and Averroes refer. Yet no work by Themistius on the Topics has come down to us in Greek. With a view to reconstructing the work(s) of this author, we have here collected and translated the passages that are attributed to him explicitly (with the exception of one of them) in Averroes' Middle Commentary on the Topics, comparing them, where necessary, to the testimonies collected by Boethius in his De topicis differentiis. In addition - and this is a new element added to the file - we show that the Themistian classification of loci was taken up by Abū al-Barakāt al-Baġdādī (ob. after 1164), author of a philosophical summa entitled al-Kitāb al-muʿtabar (The meditated book). These three testimonies are all the more precious in that they are independent of one another. The study of the chapter in the logical part of al-Kitāb al-muʿtabar, containing the Themistian classification of loci, of which a corrected text with translation is offered, shows that one finds in it some of the most singular aspects of this classification, as it appears in Boethius. Abū al-Barakāt al-Baġdādī thus reveals himself to be closer than Averroes to the testimony of Boethius. This suggests the idea of a double redaction by Themistius of the classification of loci: one, more concentrated, comes from an introduction to the paraphrase of the central books of the Topics, which may have inspired Averroes; the other, more extensive, which will have been part of an original work, and inspired the classifications of Boethius and of Abū al-Barakāt al-Baġdādī.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1533","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1533,"authors_free":[{"id":1760,"entry_id":1533,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":788,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","free_first_name":"Ahmad","free_last_name":"Hasnawi","norm_person":{"id":788,"first_name":"Ahmad","last_name":"Hasnawi","full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1011618869","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29672431","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ahmad Hasnawi"}}],"entry_title":"Bo\u00e8ce, Averro\u00e8s et Ab\u016b al-Barak\u0101t al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b. T\u00e9moins des \u00e9crits de Th\u00e9mistius sur les Topiques d'Aristote","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Bo\u00e8ce, Averro\u00e8s et Ab\u016b al-Barak\u0101t al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b. T\u00e9moins des \u00e9crits de Th\u00e9mistius sur les Topiques d'Aristote"},"abstract":"Aristotle's Topics, and especially, as far as the subject of this study is concerned, their central books (II-VII), played a role of central importance both in the medieval Latin and in the Arabic logical tradition. This did not occur without transformations, which affected the nature and the function of the loci of which these books set forth the theory. One of the most visible signposts of this tradition of re-elaboration of the Topics is represented by Themistius (ob. c. 388), to whom both Boethius and Averroes refer. Yet no work by Themistius on the Topics has come down to us in Greek. With a view to reconstructing the work(s) of this author, we have here collected and translated the passages that are attributed to him explicitly (with the exception of one of them) in Averroes' Middle Commentary on the Topics, comparing them, where necessary, to the testimonies collected by Boethius in his De topicis differentiis. In addition - and this is a new element added to the file - we show that the Themistian classification of loci was taken up by Ab\u016b al-Barak\u0101t al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b (ob. after 1164), author of a philosophical summa entitled al-Kit\u0101b al-mu\u02bftabar (The meditated book). These three testimonies are all the more precious in that they are independent of one another. The study of the chapter in the logical part of al-Kit\u0101b al-mu\u02bftabar, containing the Themistian classification of loci, of which a corrected text with translation is offered, shows that one finds in it some of the most singular aspects of this classification, as it appears in Boethius. Ab\u016b al-Barak\u0101t al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b thus reveals himself to be closer than Averroes to the testimony of Boethius. This suggests the idea of a double redaction by Themistius of the classification of loci: one, more concentrated, comes from an introduction to the paraphrase of the central books of the Topics, which may have inspired Averroes; the other, more extensive, which will have been part of an original work, and inspired the classifications of Boethius and of Ab\u016b al-Barak\u0101t al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b.","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":788,"full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1533,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"17","issue":"2","pages":"203\u2013265"}},"sort":[2007]}

Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metafísica II, 1, 2005
By: Rafael Ramón Guerrero
Title Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metafísica II, 1
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2005
Journal Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía
Volume 29
Pages 13–28
Categories Commentary, Metaphysics
Author(s) Rafael Ramón Guerrero
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Averroes, stoutly influenced by Aristotle, affirmed the necessity of experience to increase all knowledge. Truth, thing's last nature, is obtained as time elapses and is only reached by accepting the predecessors's participation. Progress implies tradition and betterment: the former by impelling the development of both culture and intellect, and the latter as a result of a critical screening of diverse opinions, since it facilitates the knowledge of truth and the recognition of error. This scientific progress is reached as a consequence of effort and collaboration. Averroes sustained these ideas in his Commentary to Metaphysics II, 1, distinguishing four parts: a) Man's natural desire of truth and intellect's difficulty for reaching the most intelligible things; b) The predecessors's contribution, by their commentaries and clarifications, and the historical-progressive character of human reason; c) Philosophy, science of truth, as an investigation of complete reality; d) Truth as knowledge of cause, that is to say, the consideration of things as prove of their Author. Averroes also stated that both the Law, through Revelation, and philosophy, through reason, have the same objective, therefore it being compulsory to recur to previous contributions.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1560","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1560,"authors_free":[{"id":1791,"entry_id":1560,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":844,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","free_first_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n","free_last_name":"Guerrero","norm_person":{"id":844,"first_name":"Rafael","last_name":"Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","full_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105670229X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73930694","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero"}}],"entry_title":"Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1"},"abstract":"Averroes, stoutly influenced by Aristotle, affirmed the necessity of experience to increase all knowledge. Truth, thing's last nature, is obtained as time elapses and is only reached by accepting the predecessors's participation. Progress implies tradition and betterment: the former by impelling the development of both culture and intellect, and the latter as a result of a critical screening of diverse opinions, since it facilitates the knowledge of truth and the recognition of error. This scientific progress is reached as a consequence of effort and collaboration. Averroes sustained these ideas in his Commentary to Metaphysics II, 1, distinguishing four parts: a) Man's natural desire of truth and intellect's difficulty for reaching the most intelligible things; b) The predecessors's contribution, by their commentaries and clarifications, and the historical-progressive character of human reason; c) Philosophy, science of truth, as an investigation of complete reality; d) Truth as knowledge of cause, that is to say, the consideration of things as prove of their Author. Averroes also stated that both the Law, through Revelation, and philosophy, through reason, have the same objective, therefore it being compulsory to recur to previous contributions.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":844,"full_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1560,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"T\u00f3picos. Revista de Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"13\u201328"}},"sort":[2005]}

Comentario mayor al libro 'Acerca del alma' de Aristóteles. Traducción parcial, 2005
By: Averroes,
Title Comentario mayor al libro 'Acerca del alma' de Aristóteles. Traducción parcial
Translation Averroes' Long Commentary on Aristotles' De Anima. A Partial Translation
Type Article
Language undefined
Date 2005
Journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía
Volume 22
Pages 65–109
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Aristotle
Author(s) Averroes ,
Publisher(s)
Translator(s) Josep Puig Montada

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1475","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1475,"authors_free":[{"id":1687,"entry_id":1475,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":1688,"entry_id":1475,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Comentario mayor al libro 'Acerca del alma' de Arist\u00f3teles. Traducci\u00f3n parcial","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":"Averroes' Long Commentary on Aristotles' De Anima. A Partial Translation","main_title":{"title":"Comentario mayor al libro 'Acerca del alma' de Arist\u00f3teles. Traducci\u00f3n parcial"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2005","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[{"id":68,"aw_title":"Long Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1475,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"22","issue":null,"pages":"65\u2013109"}},"sort":[2005]}

La distinción nombre-verbo en los comentarios al perihermeneias de Alfarabi y Averroes, 2003
By: José Angel García Cuadrado
Title La distinción nombre-verbo en los comentarios al perihermeneias de Alfarabi y Averroes
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2003
Journal Revista española de filosofía medieval
Volume 10
Pages 157–169
Categories al-Fārābī, Logic, Commentary
Author(s) José Angel García Cuadrado
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1562","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1562,"authors_free":[{"id":1793,"entry_id":1562,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1111,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jos\u00e9 Angel Garc\u00eda Cuadrado","free_first_name":"Jos\u00e9 Angel","free_last_name":"Garc\u00eda Cuadrado","norm_person":{"id":1111,"first_name":"Jos\u00e9 Angel","last_name":"Garc\u00eda Cuadrado","full_name":"Jos\u00e9 Angel Garc\u00eda Cuadrado","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1032888369","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/178348","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jos\u00e9 Angel Garc\u00eda Cuadrado"}}],"entry_title":"La distinci\u00f3n nombre-verbo en los comentarios al perihermeneias de Alfarabi y Averroes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La distinci\u00f3n nombre-verbo en los comentarios al perihermeneias de Alfarabi y Averroes"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2003","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1111,"full_name":"Jos\u00e9 Angel Garc\u00eda Cuadrado","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1562,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista espa\u00f1ola de filosof\u00eda medieval","volume":"10","issue":null,"pages":"157\u2013169"}},"sort":[2003]}

Tafsīr del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto, 2003
By: Averroes,
Title Tafsīr del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto
Type Article
Language undefined
Date 2003
Journal Endoxa
Volume 17
Pages 9–61
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Aristotle
Author(s) Averroes ,
Publisher(s)
Translator(s) Andrés Martínez Lorca

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1476","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1476,"authors_free":[{"id":1689,"entry_id":1476,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":1690,"entry_id":1476,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","free_last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"Tafs\u012br del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Tafs\u012br del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2003","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[{"id":66,"aw_title":"Short Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1476,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Endoxa","volume":"17","issue":null,"pages":"9\u201361"}},"sort":[2003]}

Philosophical Commentaries and Popular Culture in Islam, 1995
By: Alfred L. Ivry
Title Philosophical Commentaries and Popular Culture in Islam
Type Article
Language English
Date 1995
Pages 37–49
Categories Influence, Commentary
Author(s) Alfred L. Ivry
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"453","_score":null,"_source":{"id":453,"authors_free":[{"id":596,"entry_id":453,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":653,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","free_first_name":"Alfred L.","free_last_name":"Ivry","norm_person":{"id":653,"first_name":"Alfred L.","last_name":"Ivry","full_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172513073","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/117886983","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd172513073.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alfred L. Ivry"}}],"entry_title":"Philosophical Commentaries and Popular Culture in Islam","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Philosophical Commentaries and Popular Culture in Islam"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":653,"full_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":453,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"37\u201349"}},"sort":["Philosophical Commentaries and Popular Culture in Islam"]}

Pierre Bayle et la critique d’Averroès à Coimbra. Deux épisodes de la réception d’Averroès, 2013
By: Mário Santiago de Carvalho
Title Pierre Bayle et la critique d’Averroès à Coimbra. Deux épisodes de la réception d’Averroès
Type Article
Language French
Date 2013
Journal Revista Filosófica de Coimbra
Volume 22
Issue 44
Pages 417–432
Categories De anima, Commentary, Psychology
Author(s) Mário Santiago de Carvalho
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5278","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5278,"authors_free":[{"id":6094,"entry_id":5278,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"M\u00e1rio Santiago de Carvalho","free_first_name":"M\u00e1rio Santiago","free_last_name":"de Carvalho","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Pierre Bayle et la critique d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Coimbra. Deux \u00e9pisodes de la r\u00e9ception d\u2019Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pierre Bayle et la critique d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Coimbra. Deux \u00e9pisodes de la r\u00e9ception d\u2019Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5278,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista Filos\u00f3fica de Coimbra","volume":"22","issue":"44","pages":"417\u2013432"}},"sort":["Pierre Bayle et la critique d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Coimbra. Deux \u00e9pisodes de la r\u00e9ception d\u2019Averro\u00e8s"]}

Prayers to the God of Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, 2011
By: Yehuda Halper
Title Prayers to the God of Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics
Type Article
Language English
Date 2011
Journal Zutot
Volume 8
Pages 15–29
Categories Aristotle, Commentary, Metaphysics
Author(s) Yehuda Halper
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
In one incomplete manuscript of Aristotle’s Metaphysics with Averroes’ Long Commentary, a scribe has inserted short prayers, which seem to fit the genre of tefillot siyyum, to be read by the reader of the text upon completion of certain chapters of Book Δ of the Metaphysics. These prayers are thematically related to the content of Aristotle’s Metaphysics and Averroes’ commentary and accordingly suggest a philosophical interpretation of Judaism, God and the creation of the world that has as its centre-point metaphysics, as understood by Aristotle and his most important commentator, Averroes.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5314","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5314,"authors_free":[{"id":6145,"entry_id":5314,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Prayers to the God of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Prayers to the God of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"},"abstract":"In one incomplete manuscript of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics with Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary, a scribe has inserted short prayers, which seem to fit the genre of tefillot siyyum, to be read by the reader of the text upon completion of certain chapters of Book \u0394 of the Metaphysics. These prayers are thematically related to the content of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics and Averroes\u2019 commentary and accordingly suggest a philosophical interpretation of Judaism, God and the creation of the world that has as its centre-point metaphysics, as understood by Aristotle and his most important commentator, Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/18750214-12341242","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5314,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zutot","volume":"8 ","issue":"","pages":"15\u201329 "}},"sort":["Prayers to the God of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"]}

Questions of Methodology in Aristotle’s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective, 2012
By: Ahuva Gaziel
Title Questions of Methodology in Aristotle’s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal Journal of the History of Biology
Volume 45
Issue 2
Pages 329–352
Categories Aristotle, Tradition and Reception, Commentary, Gersonides
Author(s) Ahuva Gaziel
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
During the Middle Ages Aristotle’s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle’s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes’ commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle’s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5313","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5313,"authors_free":[{"id":6144,"entry_id":5313,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahuva Gaziel","free_first_name":"Ahuva","free_last_name":"Gaziel","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective"},"abstract":"During the Middle Ages Aristotle\u2019s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle\u2019s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle\u2019s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes\u2019 commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle\u2019s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle\u2019s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10739-011-9284-6","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5313,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Biology","volume":"45","issue":"2 ","pages":"329\u2013352"}},"sort":["Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective"]}

Relation as Key to God’s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tahāfut al- tahāfut and the Damīma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghazālī and Avicenna, 2020
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Relation as Key to God’s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tahāfut al- tahāfut and the Damīma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghazālī and Avicenna
Type Article
Language English
Date 2020
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 20
Issue 1
Pages 1–26
Categories Avicenna, al-Ġazālī, Commentary
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This article deals with the divine knowledge of particulars in Averroes’ Tahāfut al-tahāfut and Ḍamīma. It examines how the concept of relation, generally neglected, is at the heart of the dispute between Avicenna, al-Ġazālī, and the Commentator. In al-Ġazālī’s eyes, Avicenna's misconception of divine knowledge “in a universal way” is based on a misuse of relation in the case of God's knowledge. If particulars change and God does not, his knowledge of particulars, insofar as it undergoes change, can be considered a pure relation without ontological consequences. Averroes contests both al-Ġazālī’s criticism and his proposal, despite the fact that, for different reasons involving the coming-to-be of human knowledge, he too employs the notion of pure relation in his Long Commentary on the Physics.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5038","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5038,"authors_free":[{"id":5785,"entry_id":5038,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Relation as Key to God\u2019s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tah\u0101fut al- tah\u0101fut and the Dam\u012bma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Avicenna","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Relation as Key to God\u2019s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tah\u0101fut al- tah\u0101fut and the Dam\u012bma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Avicenna"},"abstract":"This article deals with the divine knowledge of particulars in Averroes\u2019 Tah\u0101fut al-tah\u0101fut and \u1e0cam\u012bma. It examines how the concept of relation, generally neglected, is at the heart of the dispute between Avicenna, al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b, and the Commentator. In al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b\u2019s eyes, Avicenna's misconception of divine knowledge \u201cin a universal way\u201d is based on a misuse of relation in the case of God's knowledge. If particulars change and God does not, his knowledge of particulars, insofar as it undergoes change, can be considered a pure relation without ontological consequences. Averroes contests both al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b\u2019s criticism and his proposal, despite the fact that, for different reasons involving the coming-to-be of human knowledge, he too employs the notion of pure relation in his Long Commentary on the Physics.","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1017\/S0957423919000109","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5038,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"20","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201326"}},"sort":["Relation as Key to God\u2019s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tah\u0101fut al- tah\u0101fut and the Dam\u012bma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Avicenna"]}

Rereading Metaphysics Ε2-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary, 2022
By: Dustin Klinger
Title Rereading Metaphysics Ε2-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary
Type Article
Language English
Date 2022
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 32
Issue 1
Pages 109–135
Categories Metaphysics, Commentary, Providence
Author(s) Dustin Klinger
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
In the fresh reading proposed here of the still not satisfactorily interpreted passages in Metaphysics Ε2-3, Aristotle emerges as making a case against determinism based on a robust notion of the accident. Accidental beings are uncaused causes and have their rightful place in Aristotle's ontology. The resulting physical indeterminism is here used as a litmus test for the exegetical practice of the great Commentator, Averroes, whose self-proclaimed, and later proverbial, loyalty to Aristotle's text will be shown to give way to idiosyncratic interpretations at times. His explanations of Metaphysics Ε2-3 are sparse and no less obscure than Aristotle's text. It is only when read together with his commentaries on the Physics, to which he explicitly refers twice in his Long commentary on Metaphysics Ε2-3, that a surprising picture emerges. Averroes recycles the notion of the accident, now reconceptualised in cosmological terms, and – putting it to the opposite use of Aristotle's – weaves it into an original theory of motion that integrates both supra- and sublunar realms into a deterministic framework of uninterrupted causal chains, thus safeguarding the principle of Divine providence.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5362","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5362,"authors_free":[{"id":6213,"entry_id":5362,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dustin Klinger","free_first_name":"Dustin ","free_last_name":"Klinger","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Rereading Metaphysics \u03952-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Rereading Metaphysics \u03952-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary"},"abstract":"In the fresh reading proposed here of the still not satisfactorily interpreted passages in Metaphysics \u03952-3, Aristotle emerges as making a case against determinism based on a robust notion of the accident. Accidental beings are uncaused causes and have their rightful place in Aristotle's ontology. The resulting physical indeterminism is here used as a litmus test for the exegetical practice of the great Commentator, Averroes, whose self-proclaimed, and later proverbial, loyalty to Aristotle's text will be shown to give way to idiosyncratic interpretations at times. His explanations of Metaphysics \u03952-3 are sparse and no less obscure than Aristotle's text. It is only when read together with his commentaries on the Physics, to which he explicitly refers twice in his Long commentary on Metaphysics \u03952-3, that a surprising picture emerges. Averroes recycles the notion of the accident, now reconceptualised in cosmological terms, and \u2013 putting it to the opposite use of Aristotle's \u2013 weaves it into an original theory of motion that integrates both supra- and sublunar realms into a deterministic framework of uninterrupted causal chains, thus safeguarding the principle of Divine providence.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0957423921000138","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":68,"category_name":"Providence","link":"bib?categories[]=Providence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5362,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy ","volume":"32 ","issue":"1","pages":"109\u2013135 "}},"sort":["Rereading Metaphysics \u03952-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary"]}

Response, 1997
By: Alfred L. Ivry
Title Response
Type Article
Language German
Date 1997
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 7
Issue 1
Pages 153–155
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Transmission
Author(s) Alfred L. Ivry
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Herbert Davidson's critique of my thesis regarding the relation between Averroes' Middle and Long commentaries on De anima contrasts my reading and translation of Middle Commentary passages with his own. I leave it to the informed reader to judge whether one translation is more "neutral" than the other, excluding the specific denotation which I give to šarḥ, which is the point at issue.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1372","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1372,"authors_free":[{"id":1564,"entry_id":1372,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":653,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","free_first_name":"Alfred L.","free_last_name":"Ivry","norm_person":{"id":653,"first_name":"Alfred L.","last_name":"Ivry","full_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172513073","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/117886983","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd172513073.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alfred L. Ivry"}}],"entry_title":"Response","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Response"},"abstract":"Herbert Davidson's critique of my thesis regarding the relation between Averroes' Middle and Long commentaries on De anima contrasts my reading and translation of Middle Commentary passages with his own. I leave it to the informed reader to judge whether one translation is more \"neutral\" than the other, excluding the specific denotation which I give to \u0161ar\u1e25, which is the point at issue.","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":653,"full_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1372,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"7","issue":"1","pages":"153\u2013155"}},"sort":["Response"]}

S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme, 2011
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme
Type Article
Language French
Date 2011
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 21
Issue 2
Pages 215–247
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1535","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1535,"authors_free":[{"id":1762,"entry_id":1535,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"},"abstract":"The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1535,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"215\u2013247"}},"sort":["S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"]}

Some Remarks on Averroes’ Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon, 2017
By: Ilyas Altuner
Title Some Remarks on Averroes’ Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon
Type Article
Language English
Date 2017
Journal Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review
Volume 1
Issue 1-2
Pages 5–17
Categories Aristotle, Metaphysics, Commentary
Author(s) Ilyas Altuner
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Averroes, considered to be the greatest Aristotelian commentator in the Middle Ages, has written three different types of commentary on almost all the works of this great philosopher: short, middle and long. These commentaries have been translated into Latin and Hebrew in the early period, and profoundly influenced both Medieval Europe and Jewish thought for centuries. The effect of Averroes in the West was to spread the whole of Europe under the name of Latin Averroism. The text what you have consists of some remarks about the translation of the commentary on the ‘Book Alpha Meizon’, the second book of Averroes’ Tafsīr Mā Ba’d at-Ṭabī’a.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5186","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5186,"authors_free":[{"id":5975,"entry_id":5186,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ilyas Altuner","free_first_name":"Ilyas","free_last_name":"Altuner","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Some Remarks on Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Some Remarks on Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon"},"abstract":"Averroes, considered to be the greatest Aristotelian commentator in the Middle Ages, has written three different types of commentary on almost all the works of this great philosopher: short, middle and long. These commentaries have been translated into Latin and Hebrew in the early period, and profoundly influenced both Medieval Europe and Jewish thought for centuries. The effect of Averroes in the West was to spread the whole of Europe under the name of Latin Averroism. The text what you have consists of some remarks about the translation of the commentary on the \u2018Book Alpha Meizon\u2019, the second book of Averroes\u2019 Tafs\u012br M\u0101 Ba\u2019d at-\u1e6cab\u012b\u2019a.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5186,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review","volume":"1","issue":"1-2 ","pages":"5\u201317"}},"sort":["Some Remarks on Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon"]}

Tafsīr del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto, 2003
By: Averroes,
Title Tafsīr del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto
Type Article
Language undefined
Date 2003
Journal Endoxa
Volume 17
Pages 9–61
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Aristotle
Author(s) Averroes ,
Publisher(s)
Translator(s) Andrés Martínez Lorca

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1476","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1476,"authors_free":[{"id":1689,"entry_id":1476,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":1690,"entry_id":1476,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","free_last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"Tafs\u012br del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Tafs\u012br del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2003","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[{"id":66,"aw_title":"Short Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1476,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Endoxa","volume":"17","issue":null,"pages":"9\u201361"}},"sort":["Tafs\u012br del de Anima. Sobre el intelecto"]}

  • PAGE 5 OF 6