La recepción de la ética aristotélica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval, 2021
By: Andrés Martínez Lorca
Title La recepción de la ética aristotélica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval
Translation The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2021
Journal Endoxa
Volume 48
Pages 15-46
Categories Aristotle, Commentary, Nicomachean ethics, Tradition and Reception, Plato, Albert, Aquinas
Author(s) Andrés Martínez Lorca
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
El pensamiento ético de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico filósofo islámico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristotélica sobre el tema, la Ética nicomáquea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo análisis de ese Comentario a través de los conceptos de eudaimonía o felicidad, philía o amistad y tò díkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y políticos apuntados por Aristóteles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso ético. Asimismo, señala la preocupación de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexión entre ética y política. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemonía la política.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiografía medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalusí como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepción de la Ética nicomáquea de Aristóteles, obra que penetró en los círculos filosóficos y también en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales teólogos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tomás de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al latín por un obispo, ayudó a su difusión en el mundo medieval y más tarde en el Renacimiento. The ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimonía or happiness, philía or friendship and tò díkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5565","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5565,"authors_free":[{"id":6459,"entry_id":5565,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez ","free_last_name":"Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world","main_title":{"title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval"},"abstract":"El pensamiento \u00e9tico de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico fil\u00f3sofo isl\u00e1mico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristot\u00e9lica sobre el tema, la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo an\u00e1lisis de ese Comentario a trav\u00e9s de los conceptos de eudaimon\u00eda o felicidad, phil\u00eda o amistad y t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y pol\u00edticos apuntados por Arist\u00f3teles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso \u00e9tico. Asimismo, se\u00f1ala la preocupaci\u00f3n de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexi\u00f3n entre \u00e9tica y pol\u00edtica. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemon\u00eda la pol\u00edtica.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiograf\u00eda medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalus\u00ed como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepci\u00f3n de la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea de Arist\u00f3teles, obra que penetr\u00f3 en los c\u00edrculos filos\u00f3ficos y tambi\u00e9n en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales te\u00f3logos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al lat\u00edn por un obispo, ayud\u00f3 a su difusi\u00f3n en el mundo medieval y m\u00e1s tarde en el Renacimiento.\r\n\r\nThe ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimon\u00eda or happiness, phil\u00eda or friendship and t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5944\/endoxa.48.2021 (refers to the whole volume)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":756,"full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5565,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Endoxa","volume":"48","issue":"","pages":"15-46"}},"sort":[2021]}

Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Poética en Tomás de Aquino, 2019
By: Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Title Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Poética en Tomás de Aquino
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2019
Journal Iztapalapa
Volume 26
Issue 58
Pages 51-62
Categories Aquinas, Aristotle, Logic, Ethics, Poetics
Author(s) Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
En el presente artículo se plantea la posibilidad de que el comentario medio de Averroes a la Poética de Aristóteles haya influido en alguna medida en Tomás de Aquino. Esta hipótesis se presenta a partir de los siguientes datos: a) Tomás de Aquino no comentó la Poética, pero sí conoció el comentario medio de Averroes a esta obra; b) Tomás de Aquino entendía la función de la poesía de modo similar a los filósofos árabes, a saber, como un discurso útil para la educación moral; y c) al igual que Averroes, Tomás de Aquino describe el discurso poético allegado al retórico y al dialéctico y, como tal, útil para engendrar convicciones.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5567","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5567,"authors_free":[{"id":6461,"entry_id":5567,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Po\u00e9tica en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Una posible influencia de Averroes en las referencias a la Po\u00e9tica en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino"},"abstract":"En el presente art\u00edculo se plantea la posibilidad de que el comentario medio de Averroes a la Po\u00e9tica de Arist\u00f3teles haya influido en alguna medida en Tom\u00e1s de Aquino. Esta hip\u00f3tesis se presenta a partir de los siguientes datos: a) Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no coment\u00f3 la Po\u00e9tica, pero s\u00ed conoci\u00f3 el comentario medio de Averroes a esta obra; b) Tom\u00e1s de Aquino entend\u00eda la funci\u00f3n de la poes\u00eda de modo similar a los fil\u00f3sofos \u00e1rabes, a saber, como un discurso \u00fatil para la educaci\u00f3n moral; y c) al igual que Averroes, Tom\u00e1s de Aquino describe el discurso po\u00e9tico allegado al ret\u00f3rico y al dial\u00e9ctico y, como tal, \u00fatil para engendrar convicciones.\r\n","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5567,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Iztapalapa","volume":"26","issue":"58","pages":"51-62"}},"sort":[2019]}

Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas, 2019
By: Shazia Jagot
Title Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas
Type Article
Language English
Date 2019
Journal Interfaces, A Journal of Medieval European Literatures
Volume 6
Pages 7-32
Categories Aquinas, Aristotle
Author(s) Shazia Jagot
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto’s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365–69), explored alongside Bonaiuto’s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi’s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323–30), and Dante’s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto’s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi’s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470–75). I argue that Memmi’s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi’s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto’s Triumph is considered alongside Dante’s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5572","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5572,"authors_free":[{"id":6466,"entry_id":5572,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shazia Jagot","free_first_name":"Shazia","free_last_name":"Jagot","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas"},"abstract":"This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto\u2019s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365\u201369), explored alongside Bonaiuto\u2019s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi\u2019s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323\u201330), and Dante\u2019s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto\u2019s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi\u2019s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470\u201375). I argue that Memmi\u2019s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi\u2019s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto\u2019s Triumph is considered alongside Dante\u2019s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13130\/interfaces-06-02","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5572,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Interfaces, A Journal of Medieval European Literatures","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"7-32"}},"sort":[2019]}

The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas, 2014
By: Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo
Title The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas
Type Article
Language English
Date 2014
Journal American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
Volume 88
Issue 2
Pages 361–379
Categories Aquinas
Author(s) Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2013","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2013,"authors_free":[{"id":2454,"entry_id":2013,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1602,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","free_first_name":"Francisco J.","free_last_name":"Romero Carrasquillo","norm_person":{"id":1602,"first_name":"Francisco J.","last_name":"Romero Carrasquillo","full_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051112966","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/64147423039444880878","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo"}}],"entry_title":"The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1602,"full_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2013,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly","volume":"88","issue":"2","pages":"361\u2013379"}},"sort":[2014]}

Siger de Brabant et la notion d’operans intrinsecum: un coup de maître?, 2013
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Siger de Brabant et la notion d’operans intrinsecum: un coup de maître?
Type Article
Language French
Date 2013
Journal Revue des Sciences philosophiques et théologiques
Volume 97
Issue 1
Pages 3–36
Categories Siger of Brabant, Latin Averroism, Aquinas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The present article pertains to the notion of operans intrinsecum that Siger of Brabant, in response to Thomas Aquinas, places at the heart of his De anima intellectiva in order to reconsider the intellect’s relationship to the body. Drawing upon the model of celestial auto-motricity, the author aims to show two things. First, Siger finds in the Aquinate the elements for his own solution (without simply transferring the thomasian position). Second, he does so pertinently by recovering in Thomas Aquinas one of the muted but decisive sources for his cosmology: Averroes. Far from being a miserable escape hence decried, or even a first step toward Thomas’ noetic, the “intrinsic operant” is the subtle and sound concept of a master capably enriching his contested exegesis of the De anima with averroist physics.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5302","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5302,"authors_free":[{"id":6128,"entry_id":5302,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?"},"abstract":"The present article pertains to the notion of operans intrinsecum that Siger of Brabant, in response to Thomas Aquinas, places at the heart of his De anima intellectiva in order to reconsider the intellect\u2019s relationship to the body. Drawing upon the model of celestial auto-motricity, the author aims to show two things. First, Siger finds in the Aquinate the elements for his own solution (without simply transferring the thomasian position). Second, he does so pertinently by recovering in Thomas Aquinas one of the muted but decisive sources for his cosmology: Averroes. Far from being a miserable escape hence decried, or even a first step toward Thomas\u2019 noetic, the \u201cintrinsic operant\u201d is the subtle and sound concept of a master capably enriching his contested exegesis of the De anima with averroist physics.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.971.0003 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5302,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"97","issue":"1","pages":"3\u201336"}},"sort":[2013]}

?Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tomás de Aquino intérprete de Averroes, 2012
By: Mariano Pérez Carrasco
Title ?Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tomás de Aquino intérprete de Averroes
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2012
Journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía
Volume 29
Issue 1
Pages 45–63
Categories Aquinas
Author(s) Mariano Pérez Carrasco
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
¿Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? ¿Qué es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemológico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filosóficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tomás de Aquino no sólo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filosófica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos capítulos centrales. Uno de esos capítulos es el así llamado ‘‘averroísmo latino’’, fuertemente criticado por Tomás en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este artículo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tomás no sólo procura refutar la epistemología de Averroes, sino que, además, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como características del ‘‘averroísmo’’. Más específicamente, el artículo llama la atención acerca del modo en que Tomás (mal)interpreta la teoría de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en términos de su propia teoría de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento).

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1791","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1791,"authors_free":[{"id":2066,"entry_id":1791,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1507,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","free_first_name":"Mariano","free_last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","norm_person":{"id":1507,"first_name":"Mariano","last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142907456","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/160133814","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco"}}],"entry_title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"},"abstract":"\u00bfCu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? \u00bfQu\u00e9 es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemol\u00f3gico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filos\u00f3ficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no s\u00f3lo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filos\u00f3fica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos cap\u00edtulos centrales. Uno de esos cap\u00edtulos es el as\u00ed llamado \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo latino\u2019\u2019, fuertemente criticado por Tom\u00e1s en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este art\u00edculo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tom\u00e1s no s\u00f3lo procura refutar la epistemolog\u00eda de Averroes, sino que, adem\u00e1s, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como caracter\u00edsticas del \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo\u2019\u2019. M\u00e1s espec\u00edficamente, el art\u00edculo llama la atenci\u00f3n acerca del modo en que Tom\u00e1s (mal)interpreta la teor\u00eda de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en t\u00e9rminos de su propia teor\u00eda de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento).","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5209\/rev_ASHF.2012.v29.n1.39454 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1507,"full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1791,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201363"}},"sort":[2012]}

Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms, 2012
By: Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Title Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Volume 86
Issue 2
Pages 89–102
Categories Ibn Bāǧǧa, Aquinas, Albert
Author(s) Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
In Albert’s De anima III, 3, chapters 6–11 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace’s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2015","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2015,"authors_free":[{"id":6121,"entry_id":2015,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier,","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"},"abstract":"In Albert\u2019s De anima III, 3, chapters 6\u201311 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace\u2019s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2015,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"89\u2013102"}},"sort":[2012]}

Vis Aestimativa and Vis Cogitativa in Thomas Aquinas’s Commentary on the Sentences, 2012
By: Jörg Alejandro Tellkamp
Title Vis Aestimativa and Vis Cogitativa in Thomas Aquinas’s Commentary on the Sentences
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal The Thomist
Volume 76
Issue 4
Pages 611–40
Categories Aquinas, Aristotle, Albert, Avicenna
Author(s) Jörg Alejandro Tellkamp
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5320","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5320,"authors_free":[{"id":6152,"entry_id":5320,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1591,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro Tellkamp","free_first_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro","free_last_name":"Tellkamp","norm_person":{"id":1591,"first_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro","last_name":"Tellkamp","full_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro Tellkamp","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/183120078","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/2633739","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=J\u00f6rg Alejandro Tellkamp"}}],"entry_title":"Vis Aestimativa and Vis Cogitativa in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Commentary on the Sentences","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Vis Aestimativa and Vis Cogitativa in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Commentary on the Sentences"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/tho.2012.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1591,"full_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro Tellkamp","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5320,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Thomist","volume":"76","issue":"4","pages":"611\u201340"}},"sort":[2012]}

Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo, 2010
By: Pellegrino Gianfranco
Title Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo
Type Article
Language Italian
Date 2010
Journal Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie
Volume 57
Issue 2
Pages 393–409
Categories Aquinas
Author(s) Pellegrino Gianfranco
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1712","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1712,"authors_free":[{"id":1974,"entry_id":1712,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1465,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Pellegrino Gianfranco","free_first_name":"Pellegrino","free_last_name":"Gianfranco","norm_person":{"id":1465,"first_name":"Gianfranco","last_name":"Pellegrino","full_name":"Gianfranco Pellegrino","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/138293538","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/76647937","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gianfranco Pellegrino"}}],"entry_title":"Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1465,"full_name":"Gianfranco Pellegrino","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1712,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"57","issue":"2","pages":"393\u2013409"}},"sort":[2010]}

Vision béatifique et séparation de l'intellect au début du XIVe siècle. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?, 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Vision béatifique et séparation de l'intellect au début du XIVe siècle. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie
Volume 53
Pages 310–342
Categories Averroism, Aquinas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"296","_score":null,"_source":{"id":296,"authors_free":[{"id":433,"entry_id":296,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":296,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"53","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013342"}},"sort":[2006]}

?Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tomás de Aquino intérprete de Averroes, 2012
By: Mariano Pérez Carrasco
Title ?Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tomás de Aquino intérprete de Averroes
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2012
Journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía
Volume 29
Issue 1
Pages 45–63
Categories Aquinas
Author(s) Mariano Pérez Carrasco
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
¿Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? ¿Qué es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemológico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filosóficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tomás de Aquino no sólo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filosófica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos capítulos centrales. Uno de esos capítulos es el así llamado ‘‘averroísmo latino’’, fuertemente criticado por Tomás en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este artículo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tomás no sólo procura refutar la epistemología de Averroes, sino que, además, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como características del ‘‘averroísmo’’. Más específicamente, el artículo llama la atención acerca del modo en que Tomás (mal)interpreta la teoría de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en términos de su propia teoría de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento).

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1791","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1791,"authors_free":[{"id":2066,"entry_id":1791,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1507,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","free_first_name":"Mariano","free_last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","norm_person":{"id":1507,"first_name":"Mariano","last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142907456","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/160133814","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco"}}],"entry_title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"},"abstract":"\u00bfCu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? \u00bfQu\u00e9 es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemol\u00f3gico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filos\u00f3ficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no s\u00f3lo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filos\u00f3fica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos cap\u00edtulos centrales. Uno de esos cap\u00edtulos es el as\u00ed llamado \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo latino\u2019\u2019, fuertemente criticado por Tom\u00e1s en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este art\u00edculo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tom\u00e1s no s\u00f3lo procura refutar la epistemolog\u00eda de Averroes, sino que, adem\u00e1s, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como caracter\u00edsticas del \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo\u2019\u2019. M\u00e1s espec\u00edficamente, el art\u00edculo llama la atenci\u00f3n acerca del modo en que Tom\u00e1s (mal)interpreta la teor\u00eda de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en t\u00e9rminos de su propia teor\u00eda de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento).","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5209\/rev_ASHF.2012.v29.n1.39454 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1507,"full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1791,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201363"}},"sort":["?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"]}

Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms, 2012
By: Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Title Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Volume 86
Issue 2
Pages 89–102
Categories Ibn Bāǧǧa, Aquinas, Albert
Author(s) Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
In Albert’s De anima III, 3, chapters 6–11 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace’s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2015","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2015,"authors_free":[{"id":6121,"entry_id":2015,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier,","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"},"abstract":"In Albert\u2019s De anima III, 3, chapters 6\u201311 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace\u2019s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2015,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"89\u2013102"}},"sort":["Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"]}

Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence, 2003
By: Fabrizio Amerini
Title Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence
Type Article
Language English
Date 2003
Journal Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale
Volume 14
Pages 79–122
Categories Metaphysics, Aristotle, Aquinas
Author(s) Fabrizio Amerini
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"542","_score":null,"_source":{"id":542,"authors_free":[{"id":689,"entry_id":542,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":812,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","free_first_name":"Fabrizio","free_last_name":"Amerini","norm_person":{"id":812,"first_name":"Fabrizio","last_name":"Amerini","full_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1037880641","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61802005","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1037880641.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fabrizio Amerini"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2003","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":812,"full_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":542,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"14","issue":null,"pages":"79\u2013122"}},"sort":["Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence"]}

Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas, 2019
By: Shazia Jagot
Title Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas
Type Article
Language English
Date 2019
Journal Interfaces, A Journal of Medieval European Literatures
Volume 6
Pages 7-32
Categories Aquinas, Aristotle
Author(s) Shazia Jagot
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto’s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365–69), explored alongside Bonaiuto’s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi’s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323–30), and Dante’s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto’s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi’s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470–75). I argue that Memmi’s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi’s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto’s Triumph is considered alongside Dante’s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5572","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5572,"authors_free":[{"id":6466,"entry_id":5572,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shazia Jagot","free_first_name":"Shazia","free_last_name":"Jagot","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas"},"abstract":"This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto\u2019s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365\u201369), explored alongside Bonaiuto\u2019s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi\u2019s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323\u201330), and Dante\u2019s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto\u2019s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi\u2019s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470\u201375). I argue that Memmi\u2019s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi\u2019s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto\u2019s Triumph is considered alongside Dante\u2019s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13130\/interfaces-06-02","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5572,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Interfaces, A Journal of Medieval European Literatures","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"7-32"}},"sort":["Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas"]}

La recepción de la ética aristotélica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval, 2021
By: Andrés Martínez Lorca
Title La recepción de la ética aristotélica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval
Translation The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2021
Journal Endoxa
Volume 48
Pages 15-46
Categories Aristotle, Commentary, Nicomachean ethics, Tradition and Reception, Plato, Albert, Aquinas
Author(s) Andrés Martínez Lorca
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
El pensamiento ético de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico filósofo islámico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristotélica sobre el tema, la Ética nicomáquea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo análisis de ese Comentario a través de los conceptos de eudaimonía o felicidad, philía o amistad y tò díkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y políticos apuntados por Aristóteles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso ético. Asimismo, señala la preocupación de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexión entre ética y política. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemonía la política.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiografía medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalusí como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepción de la Ética nicomáquea de Aristóteles, obra que penetró en los círculos filosóficos y también en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales teólogos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tomás de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al latín por un obispo, ayudó a su difusión en el mundo medieval y más tarde en el Renacimiento. The ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimonía or happiness, philía or friendship and tò díkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5565","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5565,"authors_free":[{"id":6459,"entry_id":5565,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez ","free_last_name":"Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world","main_title":{"title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval"},"abstract":"El pensamiento \u00e9tico de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico fil\u00f3sofo isl\u00e1mico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristot\u00e9lica sobre el tema, la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo an\u00e1lisis de ese Comentario a trav\u00e9s de los conceptos de eudaimon\u00eda o felicidad, phil\u00eda o amistad y t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y pol\u00edticos apuntados por Arist\u00f3teles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso \u00e9tico. Asimismo, se\u00f1ala la preocupaci\u00f3n de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexi\u00f3n entre \u00e9tica y pol\u00edtica. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemon\u00eda la pol\u00edtica.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiograf\u00eda medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalus\u00ed como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepci\u00f3n de la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea de Arist\u00f3teles, obra que penetr\u00f3 en los c\u00edrculos filos\u00f3ficos y tambi\u00e9n en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales te\u00f3logos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al lat\u00edn por un obispo, ayud\u00f3 a su difusi\u00f3n en el mundo medieval y m\u00e1s tarde en el Renacimiento.\r\n\r\nThe ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimon\u00eda or happiness, phil\u00eda or friendship and t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5944\/endoxa.48.2021 (refers to the whole volume)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":756,"full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5565,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Endoxa","volume":"48","issue":"","pages":"15-46"}},"sort":["La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval"]}

Models of the Mind. Metaphysical Presuppositions of the Averroist and Thomistic Accounts of Intellection, 2004
By: Deborah Louise Black
Title Models of the Mind. Metaphysical Presuppositions of the Averroist and Thomistic Accounts of Intellection
Type Article
Language English
Date 2004
Journal Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale
Volume 15
Pages 319–352
Categories Psychology, Aquinas
Author(s) Deborah Louise Black
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"809","_score":null,"_source":{"id":809,"authors_free":[{"id":973,"entry_id":809,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":950,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Deborah Louise Black","free_first_name":"Deborah Louise","free_last_name":"Black","norm_person":{"id":950,"first_name":"Deborah Louise","last_name":"Black","full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1061153703","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/12971847","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Deborah Louise Black"}}],"entry_title":"Models of the Mind. Metaphysical Presuppositions of the Averroist and Thomistic Accounts of Intellection","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Models of the Mind. Metaphysical Presuppositions of the Averroist and Thomistic Accounts of Intellection"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2004","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":950,"full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":809,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"15","issue":null,"pages":"319\u2013352"}},"sort":["Models of the Mind. Metaphysical Presuppositions of the Averroist and Thomistic Accounts of Intellection"]}

Religion and Philosophy in Maimonides, Averroes, and Aquinas, 2002
By: Joseph A. Buijs
Title Religion and Philosophy in Maimonides, Averroes, and Aquinas
Type Article
Language English
Date 2002
Journal Medieval Encounters
Volume 8
Pages 160–183
Categories Theology, Maimonides, Aquinas
Author(s) Joseph A. Buijs
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"903","_score":null,"_source":{"id":903,"authors_free":[{"id":1071,"entry_id":903,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1024,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joseph A. Buijs","free_first_name":"Joseph A.","free_last_name":"Buijs","norm_person":{"id":1024,"first_name":"Joseph A.","last_name":"Buijs","full_name":"Joseph A. Buijs","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/153321415","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/299383071","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Joseph A. Buijs"}}],"entry_title":"Religion and Philosophy in Maimonides, Averroes, and Aquinas","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Religion and Philosophy in Maimonides, Averroes, and Aquinas"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1024,"full_name":"Joseph A. Buijs","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":903,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Medieval Encounters","volume":"8","issue":null,"pages":"160\u2013183"}},"sort":["Religion and Philosophy in Maimonides, Averroes, and Aquinas"]}

Siger de Brabant et la notion d’operans intrinsecum: un coup de maître?, 2013
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Siger de Brabant et la notion d’operans intrinsecum: un coup de maître?
Type Article
Language French
Date 2013
Journal Revue des Sciences philosophiques et théologiques
Volume 97
Issue 1
Pages 3–36
Categories Siger of Brabant, Latin Averroism, Aquinas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The present article pertains to the notion of operans intrinsecum that Siger of Brabant, in response to Thomas Aquinas, places at the heart of his De anima intellectiva in order to reconsider the intellect’s relationship to the body. Drawing upon the model of celestial auto-motricity, the author aims to show two things. First, Siger finds in the Aquinate the elements for his own solution (without simply transferring the thomasian position). Second, he does so pertinently by recovering in Thomas Aquinas one of the muted but decisive sources for his cosmology: Averroes. Far from being a miserable escape hence decried, or even a first step toward Thomas’ noetic, the “intrinsic operant” is the subtle and sound concept of a master capably enriching his contested exegesis of the De anima with averroist physics.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5302","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5302,"authors_free":[{"id":6128,"entry_id":5302,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?"},"abstract":"The present article pertains to the notion of operans intrinsecum that Siger of Brabant, in response to Thomas Aquinas, places at the heart of his De anima intellectiva in order to reconsider the intellect\u2019s relationship to the body. Drawing upon the model of celestial auto-motricity, the author aims to show two things. First, Siger finds in the Aquinate the elements for his own solution (without simply transferring the thomasian position). Second, he does so pertinently by recovering in Thomas Aquinas one of the muted but decisive sources for his cosmology: Averroes. Far from being a miserable escape hence decried, or even a first step toward Thomas\u2019 noetic, the \u201cintrinsic operant\u201d is the subtle and sound concept of a master capably enriching his contested exegesis of the De anima with averroist physics.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.971.0003 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5302,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"97","issue":"1","pages":"3\u201336"}},"sort":["Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?"]}

The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas, 2014
By: Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo
Title The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas
Type Article
Language English
Date 2014
Journal American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
Volume 88
Issue 2
Pages 361–379
Categories Aquinas
Author(s) Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2013","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2013,"authors_free":[{"id":2454,"entry_id":2013,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1602,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","free_first_name":"Francisco J.","free_last_name":"Romero Carrasquillo","norm_person":{"id":1602,"first_name":"Francisco J.","last_name":"Romero Carrasquillo","full_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051112966","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/64147423039444880878","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo"}}],"entry_title":"The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1602,"full_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2013,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly","volume":"88","issue":"2","pages":"361\u2013379"}},"sort":["The Dialectical Status of Religious Discourse in Averroes and Aquinas"]}

Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo, 2010
By: Pellegrino Gianfranco
Title Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo
Type Article
Language Italian
Date 2010
Journal Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie
Volume 57
Issue 2
Pages 393–409
Categories Aquinas
Author(s) Pellegrino Gianfranco
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1712","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1712,"authors_free":[{"id":1974,"entry_id":1712,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1465,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Pellegrino Gianfranco","free_first_name":"Pellegrino","free_last_name":"Gianfranco","norm_person":{"id":1465,"first_name":"Gianfranco","last_name":"Pellegrino","full_name":"Gianfranco Pellegrino","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/138293538","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/76647937","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gianfranco Pellegrino"}}],"entry_title":"Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1465,"full_name":"Gianfranco Pellegrino","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1712,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"57","issue":"2","pages":"393\u2013409"}},"sort":["Un contributio al dibattitio storiografico sul tomismo tudesco. Le dimensioni indeterminate nella Summa di Nicola di Strasburgo"]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 2