Author 126
Type of Media
La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averroè alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento, 2013
By: Mauro Zonta
Title La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averroè alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento
Type Article
Language Italian
Date 2013
Journal L'averrismo in età moderna (1400–1700)
Pages 15–23
Categories Metaphysics
Author(s) Mauro Zonta
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2008","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2008,"authors_free":[{"id":2449,"entry_id":2008,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averro\u00e8 alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averro\u00e8 alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2008,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'averrismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"15\u201323"}},"sort":[2013]}

Traduttori di Averroè e traduzioni ebraico-latine nel dibattito filosofico del XV e XVI secolo, 2013
By: Silvia Di Donato
Title Traduttori di Averroè e traduzioni ebraico-latine nel dibattito filosofico del XV e XVI secolo
Type Article
Language Italian
Date 2013
Journal L'averrismo in età moderna (1400–1700)
Pages 25–49
Categories Transmission
Author(s) Silvia Di Donato
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2009","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2009,"authors_free":[{"id":2450,"entry_id":2009,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1025,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Di Donato","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Di Donato","norm_person":{"id":1025,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Di Donato","full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1034945653","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/171527049","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Silvia Di Donato"}}],"entry_title":"Traduttori di Averro\u00e8 e traduzioni ebraico-latine nel dibattito filosofico del XV e XVI secolo","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Traduttori di Averro\u00e8 e traduzioni ebraico-latine nel dibattito filosofico del XV e XVI secolo"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":1025,"full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2009,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'averrismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"25\u201349"}},"sort":[2013]}

Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averroè, 2013
By: Guido Giglioni
Title Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averroè
Type Article
Language Italian
Date 2013
Journal L'averrismo in età moderna (1400–1700)
Pages 125–144
Categories Theology
Author(s) Guido Giglioni
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2010,"authors_free":[{"id":2451,"entry_id":2010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1479,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Guido Giglioni","free_first_name":"Guido","free_last_name":"Giglioni","norm_person":{"id":1479,"first_name":"Guido","last_name":"Giglioni","full_name":"Guido Giglioni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1060847221","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51822941","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Guido Giglioni"}}],"entry_title":"Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Haec igitur est nostra lex. Teologia e filosofia nel commento di Agostino Nifo alla Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1479,"full_name":"Guido Giglioni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'averrismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"125\u2013144"}},"sort":[2013]}

Ibn Ṭufayl "maestro di Averroè". Diffusione dell'Epistola di Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān in relazione alla tradizione averroistica, 2013
By: Sara Barchiesi
Title Ibn Ṭufayl "maestro di Averroè". Diffusione dell'Epistola di Ḥayy ibn Yaqẓān in relazione alla tradizione averroistica
Type Article
Language Italian
Date 2013
Journal L'averrismo in età moderna (1400–1700)
Pages 145–166
Categories Tradition and Reception
Author(s) Sara Barchiesi
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2011","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2011,"authors_free":[{"id":2452,"entry_id":2011,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1600,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sara Barchiesi","free_first_name":"Sara","free_last_name":"Barchiesi","norm_person":{"id":1600,"first_name":"Sara","last_name":"Barchiesi","full_name":"Sara Barchiesi","short_ident":"SarBar","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Sara Barchiesi"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn \u1e6cufayl \"maestro di Averro\u00e8\". Diffusione dell'Epistola di \u1e24ayy ibn Yaq\u1e93\u0101n in relazione alla tradizione averroistica","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn \u1e6cufayl \"maestro di Averro\u00e8\". Diffusione dell'Epistola di \u1e24ayy ibn Yaq\u1e93\u0101n in relazione alla tradizione averroistica"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1600,"full_name":"Sara Barchiesi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2011,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'averrismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"145\u2013166"}},"sort":[2013]}

Een ligt schijnende in duystere plaatsen: Adriaan Koerbagh tra averroismo e libertinismo, 2013
By: Filippo Mignini
Title Een ligt schijnende in duystere plaatsen: Adriaan Koerbagh tra averroismo e libertinismo
Type Article
Language Italian
Date 2013
Journal L'averrismo in età moderna (1400–1700)
Pages 167–200
Categories Tradition and Reception
Author(s) Filippo Mignini
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2012","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2012,"authors_free":[{"id":2453,"entry_id":2012,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1601,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Filippo Mignini","free_first_name":"Filippo","free_last_name":"Mignini","norm_person":{"id":1601,"first_name":"Filippo","last_name":"Mignini","full_name":"Filippo Mignini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133914356","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/68941865","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Filippo Mignini"}}],"entry_title":"Een ligt schijnende in duystere plaatsen: Adriaan Koerbagh tra averroismo e libertinismo","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Een ligt schijnende in duystere plaatsen: Adriaan Koerbagh tra averroismo e libertinismo"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1601,"full_name":"Filippo Mignini","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2012,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"L'averrismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"167\u2013200"}},"sort":[2013]}

Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God, 2013
By: Mehmet Ata Az
Title Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God
Type Article
Language English
Date 2013
Journal Ilahiyat Studies
Volume 4
Issue 2
Pages 149-181
Categories Thomas, Theology
Author(s) Mehmet Ata Az
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2020","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2020,"authors_free":[{"id":2460,"entry_id":2020,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1606,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","free_first_name":"Mehmet Ata","free_last_name":"Az","norm_person":{"id":1606,"first_name":"Mehmet Ata","last_name":"Az","full_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","short_ident":"MehAz","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mehmet Ata Az"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1606,"full_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2020,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies","volume":"4","issue":"2","pages":"149-181"}},"sort":[2013]}

Revision and Standardization of Hebrew Philosophical Terminology in the Fourteenth Century. The Example of Averroes's Long Commentary on Aristotle's , 2013
By: Yehuda Halper
Title Revision and Standardization of Hebrew Philosophical Terminology in the Fourteenth Century. The Example of Averroes's Long Commentary on Aristotle's
Type Article
Language English
Date 2013
Journal Aleph
Volume 13
Issue 1
Pages 95-137
Categories Aristotle, Metaphysics
Author(s) Yehuda Halper
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2033","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2033,"authors_free":[{"id":2473,"entry_id":2033,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Revision and Standardization of Hebrew Philosophical Terminology in the Fourteenth Century. The Example of Averroes's Long Commentary on Aristotle's ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Revision and Standardization of Hebrew Philosophical Terminology in the Fourteenth Century. The Example of Averroes's Long Commentary on Aristotle's "},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2033,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Aleph","volume":"13","issue":"1","pages":"95-137"}},"sort":[2013]}

La pensée libre d'Averroès, 2013
By: Angèle Kremer Marietti
Title La pensée libre d'Averroès
Type Article
Language French
Date 2013
Journal Analecta Husserliana
Volume 114
Pages 371-382
Categories Law, Theology
Author(s) Angèle Kremer Marietti
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
With “La pensée libre d’Averroès”, I wished to join the important themes of Philosophy and Religion as they are joined in Averroès’ thought, against the most conservative elements within Muslim societies, which disliked what appeared to be non-Muslim influences. Ibn Rushd (Averroès) wanted to encourage the study of philosophy, because he was sensitive to the increasing tensions that led to his banishment. Though written before his exile his DECISIVE TREATISE provides a defence for philosophers charged with unbelief. Therefore I took an interest in four approaches to Ibn Rusch’s free thought. The first one was the distinction and relation between revelation and philosophy. Ibn Rushd’s Decisive Treatise begins with the contention that Law commands the study of philosophy. Ibn Rushd based on some Quranic verses, such as “Reflect, you have a vision” (59.2) and “they give thought to the creation of heaven and earth” (3:191), that command human intellectual reflection upon God and his creation. Such obligation exists in religion, then a person who has the capacity of “natural intelligence” and “religious integrity” must begin to study philosophy. Averroès thought that philosophy could enlighten revelation, when this last might be difficult to be understood for human minds. The second point I treat is Averroès’s thought that written Law (scripture, in e. Qur’an) and spoken law could be complementary each other. The Law speaks of three ways for humans to discover truth and interpret scripture: the demonstrative, the dialectical and the rhetorical. Therefore there are philosophers, theologians and the common masses. Ibn Rushd thought that demonstrative truth cannot conflict with scripture, because God gave various meanings and interpretations. Besides, the early Muslim community affirmed that scripture had both an apparent meaning and an inner meaning. Also, if it occurs that there is no consensus about a particular passage, its meaning is free for interpretation. My third point concerns the precise analysis of what is letter and what is spirit or “sense” -as the contemporary philosophers ans phenomenologues think now- on the real meaning of this letter: the sense or the way that the letter must be understood. Finally may be joined the way of right thinking, or what could be the special form of procedure with its results. In the fourth point, I refer to another treatise, on the doctrine of God known as the EXPOSITION OF THE METHODS OF PROOF CONCERNING THE BELIEFS OF THE COMMUNITY. Ibn Rushd then wanted to examine the religious doctrines that are held by the public and to determine if any of the many doctrines expounded by the different sects were the intention of the “lawgiver”. Meanwhile, he identified sects that have distorted the scriptures and developed innovative doctrines not compatible with Islam. Some arguments are examined: the first is the argument of Providence, in which one can observe that everything in the universe serves the purpose of humanity. The second is the argument of invention of plants and animals. Then he tried to explain the nature and attributes of God.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2036","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2036,"authors_free":[{"id":2476,"entry_id":2036,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1615,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","free_first_name":"Ang\u00e8le","free_last_name":"Kremer Marietti","norm_person":{"id":1615,"first_name":"Ang\u00e8le","last_name":"Kremer Marietti","full_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133757242","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/108823722","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti"}}],"entry_title":"La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"With \u201cLa pens\u00e9e libre d\u2019Averro\u00e8s\u201d, I wished to join the important themes of Philosophy and Religion as they are joined in Averro\u00e8s\u2019 thought, against the most conservative elements within Muslim societies, which disliked what appeared to be non-Muslim influences. Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s) wanted to encourage the study of philosophy, because he was sensitive to the increasing tensions that led to his banishment. Though written before his exile his DECISIVE TREATISE provides a defence for philosophers charged with unbelief. Therefore I took an interest in four approaches to Ibn Rusch\u2019s free thought. The first one was the distinction and relation between revelation and philosophy. Ibn Rushd\u2019s Decisive Treatise begins with the contention that Law commands the study of philosophy. Ibn Rushd based on some Quranic verses, such as \u201cReflect, you have a vision\u201d (59.2) and \u201cthey give thought to the creation of heaven and earth\u201d (3:191), that command human intellectual reflection upon God and his creation. Such obligation exists in religion, then a person who has the capacity of \u201cnatural intelligence\u201d and \u201creligious integrity\u201d must begin to study philosophy. Averro\u00e8s thought that philosophy could enlighten revelation, when this last might be difficult to be understood for human minds. The second point I treat is Averro\u00e8s\u2019s thought that written Law (scripture, in e. Qur\u2019an) and spoken law could be complementary each other. The Law speaks of three ways for humans to discover truth and interpret scripture: the demonstrative, the dialectical and the rhetorical. Therefore there are philosophers, theologians and the common masses. Ibn Rushd thought that demonstrative truth cannot conflict with scripture, because God gave various meanings and interpretations. Besides, the early Muslim community affirmed that scripture had both an apparent meaning and an inner meaning. Also, if it occurs that there is no consensus about a particular passage, its meaning is free for interpretation. My third point concerns the precise analysis of what is letter and what is spirit or \u201csense\u201d -as the contemporary philosophers ans phenomenologues think now- on the real meaning of this letter: the sense or the way that the letter must be understood. Finally may be joined the way of right thinking, or what could be the special form of procedure with its results. In the fourth point, I refer to another treatise, on the doctrine of God known as the EXPOSITION OF THE METHODS OF PROOF CONCERNING THE BELIEFS OF THE COMMUNITY. Ibn Rushd then wanted to examine the religious doctrines that are held by the public and to determine if any of the many doctrines expounded by the different sects were the intention of the \u201clawgiver\u201d. Meanwhile, he identified sects that have distorted the scriptures and developed innovative doctrines not compatible with Islam. Some arguments are examined: the first is the argument of Providence, in which one can observe that everything in the universe serves the purpose of humanity. The second is the argument of invention of plants and animals. Then he tried to explain the nature and attributes of God.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1615,"full_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2036,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Analecta Husserliana","volume":"114","issue":null,"pages":"371-382"}},"sort":[2013]}

The Will in Averroes and Aquinas, 2013
By: Traci Phillipson
Title The Will in Averroes and Aquinas
Type Article
Language English
Date 2013
Journal Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Volume 87
Pages 231-247
Categories Thomas, Aristotle, De anima
Author(s) Traci Phillipson
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Despite the drastic differences in their views of the intellect and the location and specific function of the will both Aquinas and Averroes are able to claim that their systems allow for moral agency because they both place the will—a faculty that is of prime importance to the process of moral action—in the individual. Both philosophers think that they are following Aristotle in making their claims about the will and the intellects. This paper will examine the issue of will and the related issue of the intellects as it appears in the Aristotelian texts and in the subsequent work of Averroes and Aquinas. It will argue that at least some of the divergence in Averroes and Aquinas can be attributed to an issue of translation regarding De Anima, and a difference in the role of cogitation and the intellects regarding will.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2041","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2041,"authors_free":[{"id":2482,"entry_id":2041,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1618,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Traci Phillipson","free_first_name":"Traci","free_last_name":"Phillipson","norm_person":{"id":1618,"first_name":"Traci","last_name":"Phillipson","full_name":"Traci Phillipson","short_ident":"TraPhi","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Traci Phillipson"}}],"entry_title":"The Will in Averroes and Aquinas","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Will in Averroes and Aquinas"},"abstract":"Despite the drastic differences in their views of the intellect and the location and specific function of the will both Aquinas and Averroes are able to claim that their systems allow for moral agency because they both place the will\u2014a faculty that is of prime importance to the process of moral action\u2014in the individual. Both philosophers think that they are following Aristotle in making their claims about the will and the intellects. This paper will examine the issue of will and the related issue of the intellects as it appears in the Aristotelian texts and in the subsequent work of Averroes and Aquinas. It will argue that at least some of the divergence in Averroes and Aquinas can be attributed to an issue of translation regarding De Anima, and a difference in the role of cogitation and the intellects regarding will.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":1618,"full_name":"Traci Phillipson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2041,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"87","issue":null,"pages":"231-247"}},"sort":[2013]}

An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth/Twelfth Century, 2012
By: Jules Louis Janssens
Title An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth/Twelfth Century
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies
Volume 3
Issue 1
Pages 117–127
Categories Review
Author(s) Jules Louis Janssens
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This volume concludes a series of three books devoted to Arabic philosophy. The first volume, published in 2007, addressed the sources and the reception of classical Arabic philosophy, and the second volume considered Arabic philosophy in the fourth/tenth century. It is immediately striking that the eleventh century, which, in line with the project, undoubtedly had to be qualified as the age of Ibn Sīnā, has been skipped. At first sight, there seems to be little philosophy during this time besides Ibn Sīnā himself and his so-called immediate disciples. Among the latter, however, one detects important differences in the way they address their master's legacy. Moreover, the eleventh century is the period in which Ibn Sīnā's philosophy entered Ashʿarite theology, perhaps already in al-Juwaynī's thought and certainly in al-Ghazālī's. Much of what comes to the fore in the present volume results from or has some basis in these facts. Let me add that in Muslim Andalusia during this century, one finds such a major thinker as Ibn Ḥazm, who, although above all a theologian, considered philosophical ideas and, inter alia, refers to al-Kindī. Hence, it is regrettable that no attention has been paid to this period. This said, the project as such has offered many new perspectives regarding classical Arabic philosophy, and the present volume is no exception. In particular, this volume shows the vivacity of philosophy, especially in Ibn Sīnā's view, in the twelfth century. As Peter Adamson, the editor, states in the introduction, the twelfth century may be characterized as a second formative period.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1634","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1634,"authors_free":[{"id":1889,"entry_id":1634,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":655,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jules Louis Janssens","free_first_name":"Jules Louis","free_last_name":"Janssens","norm_person":{"id":655,"first_name":"Jules","last_name":"Janssens","full_name":"Jules Janssens","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139312471","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/81614","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd139312471.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jules Janssens"}}],"entry_title":"An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century"},"abstract":"This volume concludes a series of three books devoted to Arabic philosophy. The first volume, published in 2007, addressed the sources and the reception of classical Arabic philosophy, and the second volume considered Arabic philosophy in the fourth\/tenth century. It is immediately striking that the eleventh century, which, in line with the project, undoubtedly had to be qualified as the age of Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, has been skipped. At first sight, there seems to be little philosophy during this time besides Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 himself and his so-called immediate disciples. Among the latter, however, one detects important differences in the way they address their master's legacy. Moreover, the eleventh century is the period in which Ibn S\u012bn\u0101's philosophy entered Ash\u02bfarite theology, perhaps already in al-Juwayn\u012b's thought and certainly in al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's. Much of what comes to the fore in the present volume results from or has some basis in these facts. Let me add that in Muslim Andalusia during this century, one finds such a major thinker as Ibn \u1e24azm, who, although above all a theologian, considered philosophical ideas and, inter alia, refers to al-Kind\u012b. Hence, it is regrettable that no attention has been paid to this period. This said, the project as such has offered many new perspectives regarding classical Arabic philosophy, and the present volume is no exception. In particular, this volume shows the vivacity of philosophy, especially in Ibn S\u012bn\u0101's view, in the twelfth century. As Peter Adamson, the editor, states in the introduction, the twelfth century may be characterized as a second formative period.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"}],"authors":[{"id":655,"full_name":"Jules Janssens","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1634,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"1","pages":"117\u2013127"}},"sort":[2012]}

An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes, 2011
By: Francisco Romero Carasquillo
Title An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes
Type Article
Language English
Date 2011
Journal Acta Philosophica
Volume 20
Issue 2
Pages 405-420
Categories Aristotle
Author(s) Francisco Romero Carasquillo
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This paper offers an account of Averroes’ early doctrine of the internal senses with special reference to the role that intentionality plays in internal sense cognition. The author points out that, whereas for Avicenna an “intention” is the object of a specific faculty, for Averroes it is the formal aspect at any level of internal-sense cognition. This interpretation is required by the need to find coherence among those passages in Averroes’ Epitome de Parva naturalia that ascribe the joining of images and intentions to both the cogitative and memorative faculties. Consequently, Averroes’ account is hopelessly incoherent unless one interprets him as departing from, and indeed revising, the Avicennian doctrine of intentionality along more a faithful Aristotelian-abstractionist framework.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2043","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2043,"authors_free":[{"id":2485,"entry_id":2043,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1620,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","free_first_name":"Francisco","free_last_name":"Romero Carasquillo","norm_person":{"id":1620,"first_name":"Francisco","last_name":"Romero Carasquillo","full_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","short_ident":"FraCar","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francisco Romero Carasquillo"}}],"entry_title":"An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes"},"abstract":"This paper offers an account of Averroes\u2019 early doctrine of the internal senses with special reference to the role that intentionality plays in internal sense cognition. The author points out that, whereas for Avicenna an \u201cintention\u201d is the object of a specific faculty, for Averroes it is the formal aspect at any level of internal-sense cognition. This interpretation is required by the need to find coherence among those passages in Averroes\u2019 Epitome de Parva naturalia that ascribe the joining of images and intentions to both the cogitative and memorative faculties. Consequently, Averroes\u2019 account is hopelessly incoherent unless one interprets him as departing from, and indeed revising, the Avicennian doctrine of intentionality along more a faithful Aristotelian-abstractionist framework.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1620,"full_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2043,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Acta Philosophica","volume":"20","issue":"2","pages":"405-420"}},"sort":["An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes"]}

An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth/Twelfth Century, 2012
By: Jules Louis Janssens
Title An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth/Twelfth Century
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies
Volume 3
Issue 1
Pages 117–127
Categories Review
Author(s) Jules Louis Janssens
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This volume concludes a series of three books devoted to Arabic philosophy. The first volume, published in 2007, addressed the sources and the reception of classical Arabic philosophy, and the second volume considered Arabic philosophy in the fourth/tenth century. It is immediately striking that the eleventh century, which, in line with the project, undoubtedly had to be qualified as the age of Ibn Sīnā, has been skipped. At first sight, there seems to be little philosophy during this time besides Ibn Sīnā himself and his so-called immediate disciples. Among the latter, however, one detects important differences in the way they address their master's legacy. Moreover, the eleventh century is the period in which Ibn Sīnā's philosophy entered Ashʿarite theology, perhaps already in al-Juwaynī's thought and certainly in al-Ghazālī's. Much of what comes to the fore in the present volume results from or has some basis in these facts. Let me add that in Muslim Andalusia during this century, one finds such a major thinker as Ibn Ḥazm, who, although above all a theologian, considered philosophical ideas and, inter alia, refers to al-Kindī. Hence, it is regrettable that no attention has been paid to this period. This said, the project as such has offered many new perspectives regarding classical Arabic philosophy, and the present volume is no exception. In particular, this volume shows the vivacity of philosophy, especially in Ibn Sīnā's view, in the twelfth century. As Peter Adamson, the editor, states in the introduction, the twelfth century may be characterized as a second formative period.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1634","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1634,"authors_free":[{"id":1889,"entry_id":1634,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":655,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jules Louis Janssens","free_first_name":"Jules Louis","free_last_name":"Janssens","norm_person":{"id":655,"first_name":"Jules","last_name":"Janssens","full_name":"Jules Janssens","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139312471","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/81614","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd139312471.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jules Janssens"}}],"entry_title":"An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century"},"abstract":"This volume concludes a series of three books devoted to Arabic philosophy. The first volume, published in 2007, addressed the sources and the reception of classical Arabic philosophy, and the second volume considered Arabic philosophy in the fourth\/tenth century. It is immediately striking that the eleventh century, which, in line with the project, undoubtedly had to be qualified as the age of Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, has been skipped. At first sight, there seems to be little philosophy during this time besides Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 himself and his so-called immediate disciples. Among the latter, however, one detects important differences in the way they address their master's legacy. Moreover, the eleventh century is the period in which Ibn S\u012bn\u0101's philosophy entered Ash\u02bfarite theology, perhaps already in al-Juwayn\u012b's thought and certainly in al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's. Much of what comes to the fore in the present volume results from or has some basis in these facts. Let me add that in Muslim Andalusia during this century, one finds such a major thinker as Ibn \u1e24azm, who, although above all a theologian, considered philosophical ideas and, inter alia, refers to al-Kind\u012b. Hence, it is regrettable that no attention has been paid to this period. This said, the project as such has offered many new perspectives regarding classical Arabic philosophy, and the present volume is no exception. In particular, this volume shows the vivacity of philosophy, especially in Ibn S\u012bn\u0101's view, in the twelfth century. As Peter Adamson, the editor, states in the introduction, the twelfth century may be characterized as a second formative period.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"}],"authors":[{"id":655,"full_name":"Jules Janssens","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1634,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"1","pages":"117\u2013127"}},"sort":["An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century"]}

Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle’s Physica and Averroes’ Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo, 2012
By: Horst Schmieja
Title Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle’s Physica and Averroes’ Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal Oriens
Volume 40
Issue 1
Pages 149–167
Categories Physics
Author(s) Horst Schmieja
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Sixty-two thirteenth and fourteenth-century Latin manuscripts of Averroes’ commentary of Aristotle’s Physics are currently known. Many of these manuscripts have a substantial gap in Book 8, stretching from about the middle of commentary 76 to the end of commentary 79. The Cathedral Library of Toledo holds a thirteenth-century manuscript which not only contains Book 8 in its entirety, but also two different Arabic-Latin translations of significant parts of textus and commentum 76. Analysis of these two versions allows important insights into the translator’s work.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1697","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1697,"authors_free":[{"id":1960,"entry_id":1697,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":917,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Horst Schmieja","free_first_name":"Horst","free_last_name":"Schmieja","norm_person":{"id":917,"first_name":"Horst","last_name":"Schmieja","full_name":"Horst Schmieja","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/109279034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/71959432","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Horst Schmieja"}}],"entry_title":"Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle\u2019s Physica and Averroes\u2019 Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle\u2019s Physica and Averroes\u2019 Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo"},"abstract":"Sixty-two thirteenth and fourteenth-century Latin manuscripts of Averroes\u2019 commentary of Aristotle\u2019s Physics are currently known. Many of these manuscripts have a substantial gap in Book 8, stretching from about the middle of commentary 76 to the end of commentary 79. The Cathedral Library of Toledo holds a thirteenth-century manuscript which not only contains Book 8 in its entirety, but also two different Arabic-Latin translations of significant parts of textus and commentum 76. Analysis of these two versions allows important insights into the translator\u2019s work.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[{"id":917,"full_name":"Horst Schmieja","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1697,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriens","volume":"40","issue":"1","pages":"149\u2013167"}},"sort":["Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle\u2019s Physica and Averroes\u2019 Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo"]}

Arabic/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1, 2012
By: Richard C. Taylor
Title Arabic/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal The Thomist. A Speculative Quarterly Review of Theology and Philosophy
Volume 76
Issue 4
Pages 509–550
Categories Thomas
Author(s) Richard C. Taylor
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2005","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2005,"authors_free":[{"id":2446,"entry_id":2005,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2005,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Thomist. A Speculative Quarterly Review of Theology and Philosophy","volume":"76","issue":"4","pages":"509\u2013550"}},"sort":["Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1"]}

Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary, 2001
By: Salim Kemal
Title Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary
Type Article
Language English
Date 2001
Journal Journal of Value Inquiry
Volume 35
Pages 391–412
Categories Poetics
Author(s) Salim Kemal
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"735","_score":null,"_source":{"id":735,"authors_free":[{"id":894,"entry_id":735,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":927,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Salim Kemal","free_first_name":"Salim","free_last_name":"Kemal","norm_person":{"id":927,"first_name":"Salim","last_name":"Kemal","full_name":"Salim Kemal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/113359926","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/71419307","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Salim Kemal"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"}],"authors":[{"id":927,"full_name":"Salim Kemal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":735,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Value Inquiry","volume":"35","issue":null,"pages":"391\u2013412"}},"sort":["Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary"]}

Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence, 2003
By: Fabrizio Amerini
Title Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence
Type Article
Language English
Date 2003
Journal Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale
Volume 14
Pages 79–122
Categories Metaphysics, Aristotle, Aquinas
Author(s) Fabrizio Amerini
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"542","_score":null,"_source":{"id":542,"authors_free":[{"id":689,"entry_id":542,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":812,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","free_first_name":"Fabrizio","free_last_name":"Amerini","norm_person":{"id":812,"first_name":"Fabrizio","last_name":"Amerini","full_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1037880641","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61802005","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1037880641.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fabrizio Amerini"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2003","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":812,"full_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":542,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"14","issue":null,"pages":"79\u2013122"}},"sort":["Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence"]}

Averroes Latinus on Memory. An Aristotelian Approach, 2006
By: David Bloch
Title Averroes Latinus on Memory. An Aristotelian Approach
Type Article
Language English
Date 2006
Journal Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge grec et latin (Université de Copenhague)
Volume 77
Pages 127–146
Categories Psychology, Natural Philosophy, Aristotle
Author(s) David Bloch
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1480","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1480,"authors_free":[{"id":1694,"entry_id":1480,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1360,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"David Bloch","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Bloch","norm_person":{"id":1360,"first_name":"David","last_name":"Bloch","full_name":"David Bloch","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103531553X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/83424463","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=David Bloch"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes Latinus on Memory. An Aristotelian Approach","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes Latinus on Memory. An Aristotelian Approach"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1360,"full_name":"David Bloch","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1480,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-\u00c2ge grec et latin (Universit\u00e9 de Copenhague)","volume":"77","issue":null,"pages":"127\u2013146"}},"sort":["Averroes Latinus on Memory. An Aristotelian Approach"]}

Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality, 2009
By: Gabriele Galluzzo
Title Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality
Type Article
Language English
Date 2009
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 19
Issue 2
Pages 157–187
Categories Metaphysics, Thomas
Author(s) Gabriele Galluzzo
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The paper analyses Averroes's and Aquinas's different reconstructions of Aristotle's ontology in the central books of the Metaphysics. The main claim the paper argues for is that Averroes endorses an explanatory criterion of substantiality, while Aquinas favours an independent existence criterion. The result of these different choices is that the Arabic commentator believes that the forms of sensible objects are more substances than the objects of which they are the forms, while the Dominican Master sticks to the traditional picture that sensible objects hold some kind of priority over their ontological constituents in general and over form in particular. For Averroes, therefore, the central books of the Metaphysics mark a major departure from the Categories ontology, where particular sensible objects are regarded as fundamental entities and so primary substances. On Aquinas's reconstruction, by contrast, sensible objects are still thought of in the Metaphysics as primary substances in spite of their being analysable into matter and form.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1386,"authors_free":[{"id":1578,"entry_id":1386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1288,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","free_first_name":"Gabriele","free_last_name":"Galluzzo","norm_person":{"id":1288,"first_name":"Gabriele","last_name":"Galluzzo","full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1027244637","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61842398","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gabriele Galluzzo"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality"},"abstract":"The paper analyses Averroes's and Aquinas's different reconstructions of Aristotle's ontology in the central books of the Metaphysics. The main claim the paper argues for is that Averroes endorses an explanatory criterion of substantiality, while Aquinas favours an independent existence criterion. The result of these different choices is that the Arabic commentator believes that the forms of sensible objects are more substances than the objects of which they are the forms, while the Dominican Master sticks to the traditional picture that sensible objects hold some kind of priority over their ontological constituents in general and over form in particular. For Averroes, therefore, the central books of the Metaphysics mark a major departure from the Categories ontology, where particular sensible objects are regarded as fundamental entities and so primary substances. On Aquinas's reconstruction, by contrast, sensible objects are still thought of in the Metaphysics as primary substances in spite of their being analysable into matter and form.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1288,"full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"157\u2013187"}},"sort":["Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality"]}

Averroes and the Teleological Argument, 2002
By: Taneli Kukkonen
Title Averroes and the Teleological Argument
Type Article
Language English
Date 2002
Journal Religious Studies
Volume 38
Pages 405–428
Categories Metaphysics
Author(s) Taneli Kukkonen
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"571","_score":null,"_source":{"id":571,"authors_free":[{"id":721,"entry_id":571,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":828,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","free_first_name":"Taneli","free_last_name":"Kukkonen","norm_person":{"id":828,"first_name":"Taneli","last_name":"Kukkonen","full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1064756859","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/242146822498007382889","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Taneli Kukkonen"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and the Teleological Argument","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes and the Teleological Argument"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":828,"full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":571,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Religious Studies","volume":"38","issue":null,"pages":"405\u2013428"}},"sort":["Averroes and the Teleological Argument"]}

Averroes como muftí, 2003
By: Juan Martos Quesada
Title Averroes como muftí
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2003
Journal Revista española de filosofía medieval. Miscellanea Mediaevalia en honor de Joaquin Lomba Fuentes
Volume 10
Pages 119–126
Categories Law
Author(s) Juan Martos Quesada
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This paper is about the activity of Averroes as mufti, the role of this occupation in the legal word in al-Andalus; also, about the confusión between Averroes and his grandfather in the donation offetuas and, finally, the legal features of Averroes.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1717","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1717,"authors_free":[{"id":1982,"entry_id":1717,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1375,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Juan Martos Quesada","free_first_name":"Juan","free_last_name":"Martos Quesada","norm_person":{"id":1375,"first_name":"Juan Martos","last_name":"Quesada","full_name":"Juan Martos Quesada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/114571773X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/15084232","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Juan Martos Quesada"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes como muft\u00ed","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes como muft\u00ed"},"abstract":"This paper is about the activity of Averroes as mufti, the role of this occupation in the legal word in al-Andalus; also, about the confusi\u00f3n between Averroes and his grandfather in the donation offetuas and, finally, the legal features of Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2003","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":1375,"full_name":"Juan Martos Quesada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1717,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista espa\u00f1ola de filosof\u00eda medieval. Miscellanea Mediaevalia en honor de Joaquin Lomba Fuentes","volume":"10","issue":null,"pages":"119\u2013126"}},"sort":["Averroes como muft\u00ed"]}

  • PAGE 2 OF 19