| Title | Rational Explanation of the Relationship between the Material Intellect and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | International Journal of Islamic Thought |
| Volume | 8 |
| Pages | 13-16 |
| Categories | Intellect, Psychology, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Davoud Zandi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The relationship between the material intellect and the active intellect from Averroes’ perspective is an important and yet complicated part of his philosophy. His views on these issues are ambiguous since they are derived from the Aristotle’s theories which seem obscure in this regard. The aim of the present study is to discover Averroes’ final theory on the relationship between the material intellect and the active intellect and their connection to human soul. Reviewing various theories of Averroes on this issue, this study shows that despite ambiguity in his explanations, his final theory is that he believes these two intellects exist apart from human soul. Considering the relationship between the material intellect and the active intellect, he believes that in some aspects both of them are the same, yet they are different in some other aspects that is, regarding their acts, they are different because the active intellect acts as a creator of forms while the material intellect is just a receiver of the forms. Nevertheless, they are the same, since the material intellect achieves perfection through the active intellect |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5575","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5575,"authors_free":[{"id":6469,"entry_id":5575,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Davoud Zandi","free_first_name":"Davoud ","free_last_name":"Zandi","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Rational Explanation of the Relationship between the Material Intellect and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Rational Explanation of the Relationship between the Material Intellect and the Active Intellect from the Perspective of Averroes"},"abstract":"The relationship between the material intellect and the active intellect from \r\nAverroes\u2019 perspective is an important and yet complicated part of his philosophy. \r\nHis views on these issues are ambiguous since they are derived from the Aristotle\u2019s \r\ntheories which seem obscure in this regard. The aim of the present study is to \r\ndiscover Averroes\u2019 final theory on the relationship between the material intellect \r\nand the active intellect and their connection to human soul. Reviewing various \r\ntheories of Averroes on this issue, this study shows that despite ambiguity in his \r\nexplanations, his final theory is that he believes these two intellects exist apart from \r\nhuman soul. Considering the relationship between the material intellect and the \r\nactive intellect, he believes that in some aspects both of them are the same, yet they \r\nare different in some other aspects that is, regarding their acts, they are different \r\nbecause the active intellect acts as a creator of forms while the material intellect is \r\njust a receiver of the forms. Nevertheless, they are the same, since the material \r\nintellect achieves perfection through the active intellect","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5575,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"International Journal of Islamic Thought","volume":"8","issue":"","pages":"13-16"}},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | Un fragment retrouvé (sur la composition des éléments) du troisième Livre perdu du Grand commentaire au De Caelo par Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 65 |
| Pages | 195-206 |
| Categories | Aristotle, De caelo |
| Author(s) | Teymor Morel , Maroun Aouad |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this article the authors reveal the discovery of a fragment of an otherwise lost text by Averroes, that was made possible in the context of the European project Philosophy in Context: Arabic and Syriac Manuscripts in the Mediterranean (PhiC). The passage at stake which is an excerpt of the third book ov Averroes Great Commentary on De Caelo, includes also a virulent critique of Avicenna. The third book did not reach us in Arabic but only in a Latin version. The fragment is larger than its Latin counterpart. It has been copied around 1542 and was appended to Hojazade's Tahāfut al-falāsifa to which it is related. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2047","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2047,"authors_free":[{"id":2490,"entry_id":2047,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1625,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Teymor Morel","free_first_name":"Teymor","free_last_name":"Morel","norm_person":{"id":1625,"first_name":"Teymor","last_name":"Morel","full_name":"Teymor Morel","short_ident":"TeyMor","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Teymor Morel"}},{"id":2491,"entry_id":2047,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1052,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Maroun Aouad","free_first_name":"Maroun","free_last_name":"Aouad","norm_person":{"id":1052,"first_name":"Maroun","last_name":"Aouad","full_name":"Maroun Aouad","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/157523497","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5071598","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Maroun Aouad"}}],"entry_title":"Un fragment retrouv\u00e9 (sur la composition des \u00e9l\u00e9ments) du troisi\u00e8me Livre perdu du Grand commentaire au De Caelo par Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Un fragment retrouv\u00e9 (sur la composition des \u00e9l\u00e9ments) du troisi\u00e8me Livre perdu du Grand commentaire au De Caelo par Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"In this article the authors reveal the discovery of a fragment of an otherwise lost text by Averroes, that was made possible in the context of the European project Philosophy in Context: Arabic and Syriac Manuscripts in the Mediterranean (PhiC). The passage at stake which is an excerpt of the third book ov Averroes Great Commentary on De Caelo, includes also a virulent critique of Avicenna. The third book did not reach us in Arabic but only in a Latin version. The fragment is larger than its Latin counterpart. It has been copied around 1542 and was appended to Hojazade's Tah\u0101fut al-fal\u0101sifa to which it is related. ","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":66,"category_name":"De caelo","link":"bib?categories[]=De caelo"}],"authors":[{"id":1625,"full_name":"Teymor Morel","role":1},{"id":1052,"full_name":"Maroun Aouad","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2047,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"65","issue":null,"pages":"195-206"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | Averroes' Middle Commentary on Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Oriens |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 254-287 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Steven Harvey , Frédérique Woerther |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The conventional view of the previous century that Averroes’ middle commentaries (talāḫīṣ) on Aristotle are all of the same form and style is no longer tenable. A full and accurate account of the similarities and differences among Averroes’ talāḫīṣ on Aristotle must consider all of them. Perhaps the least studied and least known of these middle commentaries is the one on the Nicomachean Ethics, a text which is extant today only in a critically edited medieval Hebrew translation and an as yet unedited medieval Latin translation. The two authors of the present article have each studied chapters of this commentary independently of each other and have reached different conclusions concerning its value. In this article they present a careful examination of the first book of Averroes’ commentary via its Hebrew translation and Latin translation (primarily through the two oldest and most reliable manuscripts of it) in comparison with the medieval Arabic translation of the Nicomachean Ethics that was used by Averroes (and in light of Aristotle’s Greek text). This study shows an Averroean middle commentary that is not very original and not particularly helpful, especially, for example, when compared to the quite different middle commentaries on Aristotle’s books on natural science. Indeed, he often seems to do little more than copy—not even paraphrase—the Arabic translation. On the other hand, Averroes does not hesitate to insert words as he copies in order to make the text clearer and easier to understand. Where lengthier explanations are needed, they too are attempted, at times in response to problematic translations in the Arabic text before him. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2048","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2048,"authors_free":[{"id":2492,"entry_id":2048,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":642,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steven Harvey","free_first_name":"Steven","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":642,"first_name":"Steven","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Steven Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051482674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97890242","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Steven Harvey"}},{"id":2493,"entry_id":2048,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes' Middle Commentary on Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes' Middle Commentary on Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics"},"abstract":"The conventional view of the previous century that Averroes\u2019 middle commentaries (tal\u0101\u1e2b\u012b\u1e63) on Aristotle are all of the same form and style is no longer tenable. A full and accurate account of the similarities and differences among Averroes\u2019 tal\u0101\u1e2b\u012b\u1e63 on Aristotle must consider all of them. Perhaps the least studied and least known of these middle commentaries is the one on the Nicomachean Ethics, a text which is extant today only in a critically edited medieval Hebrew translation and an as yet unedited medieval Latin translation. The two authors of the present article have each studied chapters of this commentary independently of each other and have reached different conclusions concerning its value. In this article they present a careful examination of the first book of Averroes\u2019 commentary via its Hebrew translation and Latin translation (primarily through the two oldest and most reliable manuscripts of it) in comparison with the medieval Arabic translation of the Nicomachean Ethics that was used by Averroes (and in light of Aristotle\u2019s Greek text). This study shows an Averroean middle commentary that is not very original and not particularly helpful, especially, for example, when compared to the quite different middle commentaries on Aristotle\u2019s books on natural science. Indeed, he often seems to do little more than copy\u2014not even paraphrase\u2014the Arabic translation. On the other hand, Averroes does not hesitate to insert words as he copies in order to make the text clearer and easier to understand. Where lengthier explanations are needed, they too are attempted, at times in response to problematic translations in the Arabic text before him.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/18778372-04201009","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":642,"full_name":"Steven Harvey","role":1},{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2048,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriens","volume":"42","issue":"1-2","pages":"254-287"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | Les translittérations dans la version latine du Commentaire moyen à l’Éthique à Nicomaque d’Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Bulletin de Philosophie médiévale |
| Volume | 56 |
| Pages | 61–89 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics, Transmission |
| Author(s) | Frédérique Woerther |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The present discussion derives from a larger research project that concerns the medieval Latin translation of Averroes’ Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics. The translation was carried out by Hermann the German in Toledo in 1240. I am concerned here specifically with nine passages that are distributed over three chapters of the Commentary (II.7; IV.1-3) in which the Latin translation is sprinkled with transliterations based on Greek and Arabic terms. These transliterations, which are not glosses, can be understood on several levels, and these, in turn, raise questions about the boundary between transliteration proper and translation that borrows from the source language a term which is then integrated into the Latin lexicon in the form of a calque or ‘loan translation’. Examining these transliterations makes it possible, first, to show that the translator does not follow a uniform method throughout the text, which could imply the existence of several translators or several collaborators with distinct and exclusive areas of expertise, and second, to advance the hypothesis that a Greek copy of the Nicomachean Ethics was available at the time the translation was being executed in 1240. Finally, the discussion of transliterations makes it possible to confirm certain emendations proposed by Ullman in the Arabic edition of the Nicomachean Ethics published by Akasoy and Fidora, as well as to suggest a primary classification of the surviving manuscripts of the Latin version of the Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5291","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5291,"authors_free":[{"id":6110,"entry_id":5291,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"Les translitt\u00e9rations dans la version latine du Commentaire moyen \u00e0 l\u2019\u00c9thique \u00e0 Nicomaque d\u2019Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Les translitt\u00e9rations dans la version latine du Commentaire moyen \u00e0 l\u2019\u00c9thique \u00e0 Nicomaque d\u2019Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"The present discussion derives from a larger research project that concerns the medieval Latin translation of Averroes\u2019 Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics. The translation was carried out by Hermann the German in Toledo in 1240. I am concerned here specifically with nine passages that are distributed over three chapters of the Commentary (II.7; IV.1-3) in which the Latin translation is sprinkled with transliterations based on Greek and Arabic terms. These transliterations, which are not glosses, can be understood on several levels, and these, in turn, raise questions about the boundary between transliteration proper and translation that borrows from the source language a term which is then integrated into the Latin lexicon in the form of a calque or \u2018loan translation\u2019. Examining these transliterations makes it possible, first, to show that the translator does not follow a uniform method throughout the text, which could imply the existence of several translators or several collaborators with distinct and exclusive areas of expertise, and second, to advance the hypothesis that a Greek copy of the Nicomachean Ethics was available at the time the translation was being executed in 1240. Finally, the discussion of transliterations makes it possible to confirm certain emendations proposed by Ullman in the Arabic edition of the Nicomachean Ethics published by Akasoy and Fidora, as well as to suggest a primary classification of the surviving manuscripts of the Latin version of the Middle Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics. ","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5291,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de Philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"56","issue":"","pages":"61\u201389"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | The Poetics from Athens to al-Andalus: Ibn Rushd’s Grounds for Comparison |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Modern Philology |
| Volume | 112 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Poetics, Transmission |
| Author(s) | Rebecca Gould |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5486","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5486,"authors_free":[{"id":6361,"entry_id":5486,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1827,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rebecca Gould","free_first_name":"Rebecca","free_last_name":"Gould","norm_person":{"id":1827,"first_name":"Rebecca","last_name":"Gould","full_name":"Rebecca Gould","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/112699989X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rebecca Gould"}}],"entry_title":"The Poetics from Athens to al-Andalus: Ibn Rushd\u2019s Grounds for Comparison","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Poetics from Athens to al-Andalus: Ibn Rushd\u2019s Grounds for Comparison"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/676464","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":1827,"full_name":"Rebecca Gould","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5486,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Modern Philology","volume":"112","issue":"1","pages":"1-24"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | The Will in Averroes and Aquinas |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |
| Volume | 87 |
| Pages | 231-247 |
| Categories | Thomas, Aristotle, De anima |
| Author(s) | Traci Phillipson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Despite the drastic differences in their views of the intellect and the location and specific function of the will both Aquinas and Averroes are able to claim that their systems allow for moral agency because they both place the will—a faculty that is of prime importance to the process of moral action—in the individual. Both philosophers think that they are following Aristotle in making their claims about the will and the intellects. This paper will examine the issue of will and the related issue of the intellects as it appears in the Aristotelian texts and in the subsequent work of Averroes and Aquinas. It will argue that at least some of the divergence in Averroes and Aquinas can be attributed to an issue of translation regarding De Anima, and a difference in the role of cogitation and the intellects regarding will. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2041","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2041,"authors_free":[{"id":2482,"entry_id":2041,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1618,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Traci Phillipson","free_first_name":"Traci","free_last_name":"Phillipson","norm_person":{"id":1618,"first_name":"Traci","last_name":"Phillipson","full_name":"Traci Phillipson","short_ident":"TraPhi","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Traci Phillipson"}}],"entry_title":"The Will in Averroes and Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Will in Averroes and Aquinas"},"abstract":"Despite the drastic differences in their views of the intellect and the location and specific function of the will both Aquinas and Averroes are able to claim that their systems allow for moral agency because they both place the will\u2014a faculty that is of prime importance to the process of moral action\u2014in the individual. Both philosophers think that they are following Aristotle in making their claims about the will and the intellects. This paper will examine the issue of will and the related issue of the intellects as it appears in the Aristotelian texts and in the subsequent work of Averroes and Aquinas. It will argue that at least some of the divergence in Averroes and Aquinas can be attributed to an issue of translation regarding De Anima, and a difference in the role of cogitation and the intellects regarding will.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/acpaproc201441414","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":1618,"full_name":"Traci Phillipson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2041,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"87","issue":null,"pages":"231-247"}},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Revision and Standardization of Hebrew Philosophical Terminology in the Fourteenth Century. The Example of Averroes's Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics Δ |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Journal | Aleph |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 95-137 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Yehuda Halper |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/aleph.13.1.95 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2979/aleph.13.1.95 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2033","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2033,"authors_free":[{"id":2473,"entry_id":2033,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Revision and Standardization of Hebrew Philosophical Terminology in the Fourteenth Century. The Example of Averroes's Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics \u0394","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Revision and Standardization of Hebrew Philosophical Terminology in the Fourteenth Century. The Example of Averroes's Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics \u0394"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/aleph.13.1.95","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/aleph.13.1.95","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2033,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Aleph","volume":"13","issue":"1","pages":"95-137"}},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Long Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Ishraq. Islamic Philosophy Yearbook |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 380–407 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, De anima |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Y. Eshots , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | N. V. Efremova |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1756","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1756,"authors_free":[{"id":2023,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":2024,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1488,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Y. Eshots","free_first_name":"Y.","free_last_name":"Eshots","norm_person":{"id":1488,"first_name":"Y.","last_name":"Eshots","full_name":"Y. Eshots","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/282454899","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Y. Eshots"}},{"id":2026,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1487,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"N. V. Efremova","free_first_name":"N. V.","free_last_name":"Efremova","norm_person":{"id":1487,"first_name":"N. V.","last_name":"Efremova","full_name":"N. V. Efremova","short_ident":"NVEfr","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=N. V. Efremova"}}],"entry_title":"Long Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s De anima","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Long Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s De anima"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":1488,"full_name":"Y. Eshots","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1756,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ishraq. Islamic Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"3","issue":null,"pages":"380\u2013407"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Questions of Methodology in Aristotle’s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Biology |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 329–352 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Tradition and Reception, Commentary, Gersonides |
| Author(s) | Ahuva Gaziel |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| During the Middle Ages Aristotle’s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle’s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes’ commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle’s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5313","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5313,"authors_free":[{"id":6144,"entry_id":5313,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahuva Gaziel","free_first_name":"Ahuva","free_last_name":"Gaziel","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective"},"abstract":"During the Middle Ages Aristotle\u2019s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle\u2019s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle\u2019s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes\u2019 commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle\u2019s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle\u2019s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10739-011-9284-6","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5313,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Biology","volume":"45","issue":"2 ","pages":"329\u2013352"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Vis Aestimativa and Vis Cogitativa in Thomas Aquinas’s Commentary on the Sentences |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | The Thomist |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 611–40 |
| Categories | Aquinas, Aristotle, Albert, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Jörg Alejandro Tellkamp |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5320","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5320,"authors_free":[{"id":6152,"entry_id":5320,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1591,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro Tellkamp","free_first_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro","free_last_name":"Tellkamp","norm_person":{"id":1591,"first_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro","last_name":"Tellkamp","full_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro Tellkamp","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/183120078","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/2633739","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=J\u00f6rg Alejandro Tellkamp"}}],"entry_title":"Vis Aestimativa and Vis Cogitativa in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Commentary on the Sentences","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Vis Aestimativa and Vis Cogitativa in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Commentary on the Sentences"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/tho.2012.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1591,"full_name":"J\u00f6rg Alejandro Tellkamp","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5320,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Thomist","volume":"76","issue":"4","pages":"611\u201340"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Comentario mayor al libro 'Acerca del alma' de Aristóteles. Traducción parcial |
| Translation | Averroes' Long Commentary on Aristotles' De Anima. A Partial Translation |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2005 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 22 |
| Pages | 65–109 |
| Categories | Psychology, Commentary, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Averroes , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | Josep Puig Montada |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1475","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1475,"authors_free":[{"id":1687,"entry_id":1475,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":1688,"entry_id":1475,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Comentario mayor al libro 'Acerca del alma' de Arist\u00f3teles. Traducci\u00f3n parcial","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":"Averroes' Long Commentary on Aristotles' De Anima. A Partial Translation","main_title":{"title":"Comentario mayor al libro 'Acerca del alma' de Arist\u00f3teles. Traducci\u00f3n parcial"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2005","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[{"id":68,"aw_title":"Long Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1475,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"22","issue":null,"pages":"65\u2013109"}},"sort":["Comentario mayor al libro 'Acerca del alma' de Arist\u00f3teles. Traducci\u00f3n parcial"]}
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5258","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5258,"authors_free":[{"id":6067,"entry_id":5258,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mustafa Yildiz","free_first_name":"Mustafa","free_last_name":"Yildiz","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Conceiving Religion: Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes on the Concepts of \u201cMillah\u201d and \u201cShar\u00eeah\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Conceiving Religion: Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes on the Concepts of \u201cMillah\u201d and \u201cShar\u00eeah\u201d"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/islamicphil2016104","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5258,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Philosophy","volume":"10","issue":"","pages":"62\u2013103"}},"sort":["Conceiving Religion: Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes on the Concepts of \u201cMillah\u201d and \u201cShar\u00eeah\u201d"]}
| Title | De elementis traditionalibus justitiae in primaeva schola franciscana |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Latin |
| Date | 1950 |
| Journal | Franciscan Studies |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 164-185 |
| Categories | Ethics, Aristotle, Tradition and Reception, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Hermenegildos Lio |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/41974421 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5638","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5638,"authors_free":[{"id":6543,"entry_id":5638,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hermenegildos Lio","free_first_name":"Hermenegildos ","free_last_name":"Lio","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"De elementis traditionalibus justitiae in primaeva schola franciscana","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"De elementis traditionalibus justitiae in primaeva schola franciscana"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1950","language":"Latin","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/41974421","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5638,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"10","issue":"2","pages":"164-185"}},"sort":["De elementis traditionalibus justitiae in primaeva schola franciscana"]}
| Title | De l’ὑπόκρισις au أخذ بالوجوه. L’interprétation de l’action oratoire par Averroès dans le Commentaire moyen à la Rhétorique d’Aristote |
| Transcription | De l’hypokrisis au akhdh bi-l-wujûd. L’interprétation de l’action oratoire par Averroès dans le commentaire moyen à la Rhétorique d’Aristote |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Studia Graeco-Arabica |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 59-76 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Rhetoric, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Frédérique Woerther |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The notion of ὑπόκρισις (hypokrisis) was employed for the first time with the meaning of “rhetorical delivery” in Aristotle’s Rhetoric, where it is the target of a short and highly critical analysis. A practice borrowed directly from the theatre, and apparently resistant to any form of technicisation that might give it a legitimate place alongside the other means of rhetorical persuasion, ὑπόκρισις (hypokrisis) was nevertheless extremely effective–as Aristotle acknowledged with undisguised irritation. In the face of Aristotle’s ambivalence, and torn between a purist and idealist conception of rhetoric on the one hand, and the contemporary reality of speech, which required him to recognise a practice of which he could not approve, on the other, what was Averroes’ attitude in his Middle Commentary on the Rhetoric? Dependent on the Arabic version of the Rhetoric where the term ὑπόκρισις (hypokrisis) was – with one exception – translated by the expression أخذ بالوجوه (aḫḏ bi-l-wuǧūh) – “the taking of faces” –, has Averroes followed Aristotle in his hesitations and reticences? Or has he instead chosen to legitimise the use of hypokrisis in rhetorical technique? The analysis of the Rushdian interpretation of the ‘taking of faces’ will allow a better understanding of Averroes’ exegetical method, and grasp of what it meant, to him, to be faithful to the First Master. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2050","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2050,"authors_free":[{"id":2495,"entry_id":2050,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"De l\u2019\u1f51\u03c0\u03cc\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 au \u0623\u062e\u0630 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0648\u062c\u0648\u0647. L\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de l\u2019action oratoire par Averro\u00e8s dans le Commentaire moyen \u00e0 la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote","title_transcript":"De l\u2019hypokrisis au akhdh bi-l-wuj\u00fbd. L\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de l\u2019action oratoire par Averro\u00e8s dans le commentaire moyen \u00e0 la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"De l\u2019\u1f51\u03c0\u03cc\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 au \u0623\u062e\u0630 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0648\u062c\u0648\u0647. L\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de l\u2019action oratoire par Averro\u00e8s dans le Commentaire moyen \u00e0 la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote"},"abstract":"The notion of \u1f51\u03c0\u03cc\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 (hypokrisis) was employed for the first time with the meaning of \u201crhetorical delivery\u201d in Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric, where it is the target of a short and highly critical analysis. A practice borrowed directly from the theatre, and apparently resistant to any form of technicisation that might give it a legitimate place alongside the other means of rhetorical persuasion, \u1f51\u03c0\u03cc\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 (hypokrisis) was nevertheless extremely effective\u2013as Aristotle acknowledged with undisguised irritation. In the face of Aristotle\u2019s ambivalence, and torn between a purist and idealist conception of rhetoric on the one hand, and the contemporary reality of speech, which required him to recognise a practice of which he could not approve, on the other, what was Averroes\u2019 attitude in his Middle Commentary on the Rhetoric? Dependent on the Arabic version of the Rhetoric where the term \u1f51\u03c0\u03cc\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 (hypokrisis) was \u2013 with one exception \u2013 translated by the expression \u0623\u062e\u0630 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0648\u062c\u0648\u0647 (a\u1e2b\u1e0f bi-l-wu\u01e7\u016bh) \u2013 \u201cthe taking of faces\u201d \u2013, has Averroes followed Aristotle in his hesitations and reticences? Or has he instead chosen to legitimise the use of hypokrisis in rhetorical technique? The analysis of the Rushdian interpretation of the \u2018taking of faces\u2019 will allow a better understanding of Averroes\u2019 exegetical method, and grasp of what it meant, to him, to be faithful to the First Master.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2050,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia Graeco-Arabica","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"59-76"}},"sort":["De l\u2019\u1f51\u03c0\u03cc\u03ba\u03c1\u03b9\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 au \u0623\u062e\u0630 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0648\u062c\u0648\u0647. L\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de l\u2019action oratoire par Averro\u00e8s dans le Commentaire moyen \u00e0 la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote"]}
| Title | Della Politica di Aristotele all’”averroismo politico”. Una vicenda paradossale |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Mediterranea |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 19–34 |
| Categories | Averroism, Politics, Aristotle, Modern Readings |
| Author(s) | Gregorio Piaia |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| From the early twentieth century onwards, the concept of ‘political Averroism’ has become widespread, especially with reference to Dante Alighieri and to Marsilius of Padua. It is our intention here to establish and delineate the remotest origin of this concept, which can be fundamentally traced back to two elements: the central role accorded to political reflection as a consequence of the French Revolution, and the adoption of Averroes as a symbol and figure anticipating modern rationalism. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5176","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5176,"authors_free":[{"id":5961,"entry_id":5176,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":684,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gregorio Piaia","free_first_name":"Gregorio","free_last_name":"Piaia","norm_person":{"id":684,"first_name":"Gregorio","last_name":"Piaia","full_name":"Gregorio Piaia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1141240149","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/2485674","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gregorio Piaia"}}],"entry_title":"Della Politica di Aristotele all\u2019\u201daverroismo politico\u201d. Una vicenda paradossale","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Della Politica di Aristotele all\u2019\u201daverroismo politico\u201d. Una vicenda paradossale"},"abstract":"From the early twentieth century onwards, the concept of \u2018political Averroism\u2019 has become widespread, especially with reference to Dante Alighieri and to Marsilius of Padua. It is our intention here to establish and delineate the remotest origin of this concept, which can be fundamentally traced back to two elements: the central role accorded to political reflection as a consequence of the French Revolution, and the adoption of Averroes as a symbol and figure anticipating modern rationalism. ","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21071\/mijtk.v0i3.10768 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"}],"authors":[{"id":684,"full_name":"Gregorio Piaia","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5176,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediterranea","volume":"3 ","issue":"","pages":"19\u201334"}},"sort":["Della Politica di Aristotele all\u2019\u201daverroismo politico\u201d. Una vicenda paradossale"]}
| Title | Der Mittlere Kommentar des Averroes zur aristotelischen Hermeneutik. Bericht über die vorliegenden Editionen |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1984 |
| Journal | Zeitschrift für Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften |
| Volume | 1 |
| Pages | 265–287 |
| Categories | Logic, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Egbert Meyer |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"517","_score":null,"_source":{"id":517,"authors_free":[{"id":662,"entry_id":517,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":796,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Egbert Meyer","free_first_name":"Egbert","free_last_name":"Meyer","norm_person":{"id":796,"first_name":"Egbert","last_name":"Meyer","full_name":"Egbert Meyer","short_ident":"EgbMey","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Egbert Meyer"}}],"entry_title":"Der Mittlere Kommentar des Averroes zur aristotelischen Hermeneutik. Bericht \u00fcber die vorliegenden Editionen","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Der Mittlere Kommentar des Averroes zur aristotelischen Hermeneutik. Bericht \u00fcber die vorliegenden Editionen"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1984","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":796,"full_name":"Egbert Meyer","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":517,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften","volume":"1","issue":null,"pages":"265\u2013287"}},"sort":["Der Mittlere Kommentar des Averroes zur aristotelischen Hermeneutik. Bericht \u00fcber die vorliegenden Editionen"]}
| Title | Des Mégariques aux Ashʿarites : le commentaire d’Averroès à Métaph. Θ 3 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Rursus |
| Volume | 9 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Metaphysics, Theology |
| Author(s) | Ziad Bou Akl |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In his commentary on Metaphysics IX 3, Averroes draws an analogy between the Megarian conception of dunamis, presented and refuted by Aristotle, and that of the Ashʿarites theologians. The study of the Arabic translation of lemmatas of Aristotle’s text (1047a26-28) and of the reformulation by Averroes of the third argument against the Megarians shows a shift commanded by theological issues: since the omnipotence of God can now bypass natural powers, the question of who possess the power should be added to that of its sole possession. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5218","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5218,"authors_free":[{"id":6020,"entry_id":5218,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1608,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","free_first_name":"Ziad","free_last_name":"Bou Akl","norm_person":{"id":1608,"first_name":"Ziad","last_name":"Bou Akl","full_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1105658635","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/306483990","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ziad Bou Akl"}}],"entry_title":"Des M\u00e9gariques aux Ash\u02bfarites : le commentaire d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 M\u00e9taph. \u0398 3","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Des M\u00e9gariques aux Ash\u02bfarites : le commentaire d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 M\u00e9taph. \u0398 3"},"abstract":"In his commentary on Metaphysics IX 3, Averroes draws an analogy between the Megarian conception of dunamis, presented and refuted by Aristotle, and that of the Ash\u02bfarites theologians. The study of the Arabic translation of lemmatas of Aristotle\u2019s text (1047a26-28) and of the reformulation by Averroes of the third argument against the Megarians shows a shift commanded by theological issues: since the omnipotence of God can now bypass natural powers, the question of who possess the power should be added to that of its sole possession.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4000\/rursus.1235","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1608,"full_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5218,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rursus","volume":"9","issue":"","pages":""}},"sort":["Des M\u00e9gariques aux Ash\u02bfarites : le commentaire d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 M\u00e9taph. \u0398 3"]}
| Title | Dialecticians and Dialectics in Averroes’ Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle’s Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 161–184 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Yehuda Halper |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| While Averroes’ work is often considered to represent the culmination of the method of Aristotelian demonstration in Arabic philosophy, a short passage of his Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics Γ.2 emphasizes the prominence of dialectic and calls for a re-examination of dialectic and demonstration in Averroes’ philosophical works. In this passage Averroes describes dialectic as an acceptable form of philosophy and the dialectician as a kind of scientist. In putting dialectic and demonstration on an equal, or nearly equal footing, Averroes seems to go against his own account of the dialectical and demonstrative classes of people in the Decisive Treatise. Moreover, this interpretation of Metaphysics Γ.2 also contradicts Averroes’ explanation of the same passage in the Middle Commentary on the Metaphysics as well as Aristotle's own description of dialectic throughout the Metaphysics. That is, in the Long Commentary on the Metaphysics, Averroes departs from his earlier views, and describes dialectic as a necessary part of metaphysics, even though the centrality of dialectic argumentation could call into question the entire project of metaphysics and consequently of the sciences whose demonstrations rely on metaphysical ground, i.e., all sciences. Averroes does not emphasize this view, but its presence is nevertheless unambiguous. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5246","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5246,"authors_free":[{"id":6055,"entry_id":5246,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Dialecticians and Dialectics in Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Dialecticians and Dialectics in Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"},"abstract":"While Averroes\u2019 work is often considered to represent the culmination of the method of Aristotelian demonstration in Arabic philosophy, a short passage of his Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics \u0393.2 emphasizes the prominence of dialectic and calls for a re-examination of dialectic and demonstration in Averroes\u2019 philosophical works. In this passage Averroes describes dialectic as an acceptable form of philosophy and the dialectician as a kind of scientist. In putting dialectic and demonstration on an equal, or nearly equal footing, Averroes seems to go against his own account of the dialectical and demonstrative classes of people in the Decisive Treatise. Moreover, this interpretation of Metaphysics \u0393.2 also contradicts Averroes\u2019 explanation of the same passage in the Middle Commentary on the Metaphysics as well as Aristotle's own description of dialectic throughout the Metaphysics. That is, in the Long Commentary on the Metaphysics, Averroes departs from his earlier views, and describes dialectic as a necessary part of metaphysics, even though the centrality of dialectic argumentation could call into question the entire project of metaphysics and consequently of the sciences whose demonstrations rely on metaphysical ground, i.e., all sciences. Averroes does not emphasize this view, but its presence is nevertheless unambiguous.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0957423915000156","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5246,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"26","issue":"1","pages":"161\u2013184"}},"sort":["Dialecticians and Dialectics in Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"]}
| Title | Dialecticians and dialectics in Averroes' Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle's Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 161-184 |
| Categories | Dialectic, Aristotle, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Yehuda Halper |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| While Averroes’ work is often considered to represent the culmination of the method of Aristotelian demonstration in Arabic philosophy, a short passage of his Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics Γ.2 emphasizes the prominence of dialectic and calls for a re-examination of dialectic and demonstration in Averroes’ philosophical works. In this passage Averroes describes dialectic as an acceptable form of philosophy and the dialectician as a kind of scientist. In putting dialectic and demonstration on an equal, or nearly equal footing, Averroes seems to go against his own account of the dialectical and demonstrative classes of people in the Decisive Treatise. Moreover, this interpretation of Metaphysics Γ.2 also contradicts Averroes’ explanation of the same passage in the Middle Commentary on the Metaphysics as well as Aristotle's own description of dialectic throughout the Metaphysics. That is, in the Long Commentary on the Metaphysics, Averroes departs from his earlier views, and describes dialectic as a necessary part of metaphysics, even though the centrality of dialectic argumentation could call into question the entire project of metaphysics and consequently of the sciences whose demonstrations rely on metaphysical ground, i.e., all sciences. Averroes does not emphasize this view, but its presence is nevertheless unambiguous. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5483","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5483,"authors_free":[{"id":6358,"entry_id":5483,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Dialecticians and dialectics in Averroes' Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle's Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Dialecticians and dialectics in Averroes' Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle's Metaphysics"},"abstract":"While Averroes\u2019 work is often considered to represent the culmination of the method of Aristotelian demonstration in Arabic philosophy, a short passage of his Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics \u0393.2 emphasizes the prominence of dialectic and calls for a re-examination of dialectic and demonstration in Averroes\u2019 philosophical works. In this passage Averroes describes dialectic as an acceptable form of philosophy and the dialectician as a kind of scientist. In putting dialectic and demonstration on an equal, or nearly equal footing, Averroes seems to go against his own account of the dialectical and demonstrative classes of people in the Decisive Treatise. Moreover, this interpretation of Metaphysics \u0393.2 also contradicts Averroes\u2019 explanation of the same passage in the Middle Commentary on the Metaphysics as well as Aristotle's own description of dialectic throughout the Metaphysics. That is, in the Long Commentary on the Metaphysics, Averroes departs from his earlier views, and describes dialectic as a necessary part of metaphysics, even though the centrality of dialectic argumentation could call into question the entire project of metaphysics and consequently of the sciences whose demonstrations rely on metaphysical ground, i.e., all sciences. Averroes does not emphasize this view, but its presence is nevertheless unambiguous.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1017\/S0957423915000156","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":79,"category_name":"Dialectic","link":"bib?categories[]=Dialectic"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5483,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"26","issue":"1","pages":"161-184"}},"sort":["Dialecticians and dialectics in Averroes' Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle's Metaphysics"]}
| Title | Die Metaphysica Media Übersetzungsmethode und Textverständnis |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1975 |
| Journal | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age |
| Volume | 42 |
| Pages | 7-69 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Transmission, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Gudrun Vuillemin-Diem |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44403664 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5707","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5707,"authors_free":[{"id":6615,"entry_id":5707,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1520,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gudrun Vuillemin-Diem","free_first_name":"Gudrun ","free_last_name":"Vuillemin-Diem","norm_person":{"id":1520,"first_name":"Gudrun","last_name":"Vuillemin-Diem","full_name":"Gudrun Vuillemin-Diem","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1102516465","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7385864","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gudrun Vuillemin-Diem"}}],"entry_title":"Die Metaphysica Media \u00dcbersetzungsmethode und Textverst\u00e4ndnis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Die Metaphysica Media \u00dcbersetzungsmethode und Textverst\u00e4ndnis"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1975","language":"German","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44403664","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1520,"full_name":"Gudrun Vuillemin-Diem","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5707,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litt\u00e9raire du Moyen Age","volume":"42","issue":"","pages":" 7-69"}},"sort":["Die Metaphysica Media \u00dcbersetzungsmethode und Textverst\u00e4ndnis"]}