| Title | Dialecticians and dialectics in Averroes' Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle's Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 161-184 |
| Categories | Dialectic, Aristotle, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Yehuda Halper |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| While Averroes’ work is often considered to represent the culmination of the method of Aristotelian demonstration in Arabic philosophy, a short passage of his Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics Γ.2 emphasizes the prominence of dialectic and calls for a re-examination of dialectic and demonstration in Averroes’ philosophical works. In this passage Averroes describes dialectic as an acceptable form of philosophy and the dialectician as a kind of scientist. In putting dialectic and demonstration on an equal, or nearly equal footing, Averroes seems to go against his own account of the dialectical and demonstrative classes of people in the Decisive Treatise. Moreover, this interpretation of Metaphysics Γ.2 also contradicts Averroes’ explanation of the same passage in the Middle Commentary on the Metaphysics as well as Aristotle's own description of dialectic throughout the Metaphysics. That is, in the Long Commentary on the Metaphysics, Averroes departs from his earlier views, and describes dialectic as a necessary part of metaphysics, even though the centrality of dialectic argumentation could call into question the entire project of metaphysics and consequently of the sciences whose demonstrations rely on metaphysical ground, i.e., all sciences. Averroes does not emphasize this view, but its presence is nevertheless unambiguous. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5483","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5483,"authors_free":[{"id":6358,"entry_id":5483,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Dialecticians and dialectics in Averroes' Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle's Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Dialecticians and dialectics in Averroes' Long Commentary on Gamma 2 of Aristotle's Metaphysics"},"abstract":"While Averroes\u2019 work is often considered to represent the culmination of the method of Aristotelian demonstration in Arabic philosophy, a short passage of his Long Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics \u0393.2 emphasizes the prominence of dialectic and calls for a re-examination of dialectic and demonstration in Averroes\u2019 philosophical works. In this passage Averroes describes dialectic as an acceptable form of philosophy and the dialectician as a kind of scientist. In putting dialectic and demonstration on an equal, or nearly equal footing, Averroes seems to go against his own account of the dialectical and demonstrative classes of people in the Decisive Treatise. Moreover, this interpretation of Metaphysics \u0393.2 also contradicts Averroes\u2019 explanation of the same passage in the Middle Commentary on the Metaphysics as well as Aristotle's own description of dialectic throughout the Metaphysics. That is, in the Long Commentary on the Metaphysics, Averroes departs from his earlier views, and describes dialectic as a necessary part of metaphysics, even though the centrality of dialectic argumentation could call into question the entire project of metaphysics and consequently of the sciences whose demonstrations rely on metaphysical ground, i.e., all sciences. Averroes does not emphasize this view, but its presence is nevertheless unambiguous.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1017\/S0957423915000156","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":79,"category_name":"Dialectic","link":"bib?categories[]=Dialectic"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5483,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"26","issue":"1","pages":"161-184"}},"sort":[2016]}
| Title | Abraham Bibago on Intellectual Conjunction and Human Happiness, Faith and Metaphysics according to a 15th century Jewish Averroist |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Quaestio |
| Volume | 15 |
| Pages | 309–318 |
| Categories | Averroism, Jewish Averroism, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Yehuda Halper |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The 15th century Jewish Aragonian thinker, Abraham Bibago treats conjunction in his two main works, Derekh Emunah (“The Way of Faith”) and Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics. In the former, which explicitly interprets Biblical and Talmudic stories along philosophical lines, Bibago promotes a neo-Platonic intellectual emanation schema and boldly asserts that human happiness is attained through conjunction with higher intellects. In the Commentary, which primarily treats Aristotle’s Metaphysics and Averroes’ commentaries on it, Bibago gives an account of conjunction that does not necessarily fit with the intellectual conjunction of Derekh Emunah. Indeed, his remarks in the Commentary are much less decisive about human happiness, suggesting that Bibago qua philosopher is more open minded about the summum bonum than he is qua religious thinker. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5247","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5247,"authors_free":[{"id":6056,"entry_id":5247,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Abraham Bibago on Intellectual Conjunction and Human Happiness, Faith and Metaphysics according to a 15th century Jewish Averroist","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Abraham Bibago on Intellectual Conjunction and Human Happiness, Faith and Metaphysics according to a 15th century Jewish Averroist"},"abstract":"The 15th century Jewish Aragonian thinker, Abraham Bibago treats conjunction in his two main works, Derekh Emunah (\u201cThe Way of Faith\u201d) and Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics. In the former, which explicitly interprets Biblical and Talmudic stories along philosophical lines, Bibago promotes a neo-Platonic intellectual emanation schema and boldly asserts that human happiness is attained through conjunction with higher intellects. In the Commentary, which primarily treats Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics and Averroes\u2019 commentaries on it, Bibago gives an account of conjunction that does not necessarily fit with the intellectual conjunction of Derekh Emunah. Indeed, his remarks in the Commentary are much less decisive about human happiness, suggesting that Bibago qua philosopher is more open minded about the summum bonum than he is qua religious thinker.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/J.QUAESTIO.5.108606","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":8,"category_name":"Jewish Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Jewish Averroism"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5247,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Quaestio","volume":"15","issue":"","pages":"309\u2013318"}},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | A reference to al-Fârâbî’s Kitâb al-hurûf in Averroes’ critique of Avicenna (Tahâfut al-Tahâfut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Studi Magrebini |
| Volume | 12-13 |
| Pages | 433-452 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Cecilia Martini Bonadeo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Al-Fārābī’s Book of Letters (Kitāb al-ḥurūf) and the analyses devoted in this text to the terminology of “being” are authoritative references for Averroes from the epitomes of his youth to his mature treatises. Also the Farabian doctrine of the conventionality of the natural language plays a role in Averroes’ thought. This paper discusses the Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, (pp.371,5-372.12 Bouyges), where Averroes has recourse to the Book of Letters in criticizing Avicenna’s distinction between essence and existence. Averroes explicitly mentions the title of the work and recalls a passage from the fifteenth chapter. This passage had already inspired him in the Epitome on Metaphysics, where Averroes did not mention explicitly his source, but followed in al-Fārābī’s footsteps as for the analysis of the uses of “being”. Averroes uses tacitly the same passage also in his Commentary on Metaphysics Delta 7. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5196","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5196,"authors_free":[{"id":5987,"entry_id":5196,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":831,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","free_first_name":"Cecilia","free_last_name":"Martini Bonadeo","norm_person":{"id":831,"first_name":"Cecilia","last_name":"Martini Bonadeo","full_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047649543","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/305196685","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cecilia Martini Bonadeo"}}],"entry_title":"A reference to al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee\u2019s Kit\u00e2b al-hur\u00fbf in Averroes\u2019 critique of Avicenna (Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A reference to al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee\u2019s Kit\u00e2b al-hur\u00fbf in Averroes\u2019 critique of Avicenna (Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges)"},"abstract":"Al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s Book of Letters (Kit\u0101b al-\u1e25ur\u016bf) and the analyses devoted in this text to the terminology of \u201cbeing\u201d are authoritative references for Averroes from the epitomes of his youth to his mature treatises. Also the Farabian doctrine of the conventionality of the natural language plays a role in Averroes\u2019 thought. This paper discusses the Tah\u0101fut al-Tah\u0101fut, (pp.371,5-372.12 Bouyges), where Averroes has recourse to the Book of Letters in criticizing Avicenna\u2019s distinction between essence and existence. Averroes explicitly mentions the title of the work and recalls a passage from the fifteenth chapter. This passage had already inspired him in the Epitome on Metaphysics, where Averroes did not mention explicitly his source, but followed in al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s footsteps as for the analysis of the uses of \u201cbeing\u201d. Averroes uses tacitly the same passage also in his Commentary on Metaphysics Delta 7.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":831,"full_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5196,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studi Magrebini","volume":"12-13 ","issue":"","pages":"433-452"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentators on Per Se Accidents of Being qua Being and the Place of Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Iota |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 22 |
| Pages | 153–208 |
| Categories | Commentary, Metaphysics, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Laura Maria Castelli |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1765","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1765,"authors_free":[{"id":2036,"entry_id":1765,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1498,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laura Maria Castelli","free_first_name":"Laura Maria","free_last_name":"Castelli","norm_person":{"id":1498,"first_name":"Laura Maria","last_name":"Castelli","full_name":"Laura Maria Castelli","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143083910","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/161062580","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laura Maria Castelli"}}],"entry_title":"Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentators on Per Se Accidents of Being qua Being and the Place of Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Iota","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentators on Per Se Accidents of Being qua Being and the Place of Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Iota"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1498,"full_name":"Laura Maria Castelli","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1765,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"22","issue":null,"pages":"153\u2013208"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Prayers to the God of Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Zutot |
| Volume | 8 |
| Pages | 15–29 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Yehuda Halper |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In one incomplete manuscript of Aristotle’s Metaphysics with Averroes’ Long Commentary, a scribe has inserted short prayers, which seem to fit the genre of tefillot siyyum, to be read by the reader of the text upon completion of certain chapters of Book Δ of the Metaphysics. These prayers are thematically related to the content of Aristotle’s Metaphysics and Averroes’ commentary and accordingly suggest a philosophical interpretation of Judaism, God and the creation of the world that has as its centre-point metaphysics, as understood by Aristotle and his most important commentator, Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5314","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5314,"authors_free":[{"id":6145,"entry_id":5314,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Prayers to the God of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Prayers to the God of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"},"abstract":"In one incomplete manuscript of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics with Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary, a scribe has inserted short prayers, which seem to fit the genre of tefillot siyyum, to be read by the reader of the text upon completion of certain chapters of Book \u0394 of the Metaphysics. These prayers are thematically related to the content of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics and Averroes\u2019 commentary and accordingly suggest a philosophical interpretation of Judaism, God and the creation of the world that has as its centre-point metaphysics, as understood by Aristotle and his most important commentator, Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/18750214-12341242","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5314,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zutot","volume":"8 ","issue":"","pages":"15\u201329 "}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | ʿAbd al-Laṭīf al-Baġdādī's Reception of Book Beta of Aristotle's Metaphysics against the Background of the Competing Readings by Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 411–431 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Commentary, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Cecilia Martini Bonadeo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This study is devoted to the Arabic reception of Metaphysics Beta in the Book on the Science of Metaphysics by ʿAbd al-Laṭīf al-Baġdādī (1162–1231). After a brief overview of Aristotle's scope in Beta, of its Arabic direct tradition and of the competing readings devoted to it by Avicenna and Averroes, I present ʿAbd al-Laṭīf al-Baġdādī's paraphrase. I focus on the concept of metaphysics as a science that stands out from it: metaphysics owes its leading role to the fact that it studies beings qua beings, it demonstrates the principles of particular sciences and inquiries into the first principle: it is ontology, universal science, first philosophy and theology. ʿAbd al-Laṭīf al-Baġdādī gathers all the results of the science of metaphysics produced befoe him and transmitted through the schools' milieu. Al-Kindī and al-Fārābī cooperate to this end without any perception on ʿAbd al-Laṭīf al-Baġdādī's part that a problem might arise: in ʿAbd al-Laṭīf al-Baġdādī's view, the 'theologizing' interpretation of greek metaphysics and al-Fārābī's distinction bewteen theology and ontology coexist. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1539","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1539,"authors_free":[{"id":1766,"entry_id":1539,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":831,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","free_first_name":"Cecilia","free_last_name":"Martini Bonadeo","norm_person":{"id":831,"first_name":"Cecilia","last_name":"Martini Bonadeo","full_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047649543","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/305196685","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cecilia Martini Bonadeo"}}],"entry_title":"\u02bfAbd al-La\u1e6d\u012bf al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b's Reception of Book Beta of Aristotle's Metaphysics against the Background of the Competing Readings by Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\u02bfAbd al-La\u1e6d\u012bf al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b's Reception of Book Beta of Aristotle's Metaphysics against the Background of the Competing Readings by Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"This study is devoted to the Arabic reception of Metaphysics Beta in the Book on the Science of Metaphysics by \u02bfAbd al-La\u1e6d\u012bf al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b (1162\u20131231). After a brief overview of Aristotle's scope in Beta, of its Arabic direct tradition and of the competing readings devoted to it by Avicenna and Averroes, I present \u02bfAbd al-La\u1e6d\u012bf al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b's paraphrase. I focus on the concept of metaphysics as a science that stands out from it: metaphysics owes its leading role to the fact that it studies beings qua beings, it demonstrates the principles of particular sciences and inquiries into the first principle: it is ontology, universal science, first philosophy and theology. \u02bfAbd al-La\u1e6d\u012bf al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b gathers all the results of the science of metaphysics produced befoe him and transmitted through the schools' milieu. Al-Kind\u012b and al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b cooperate to this end without any perception on \u02bfAbd al-La\u1e6d\u012bf al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b's part that a problem might arise: in \u02bfAbd al-La\u1e6d\u012bf al-Ba\u0121d\u0101d\u012b's view, the 'theologizing' interpretation of greek metaphysics and al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's distinction bewteen theology and ontology coexist.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":831,"full_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1539,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"21","issue":null,"pages":"411\u2013431"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Yaḥyá ibn ʿAdī and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 343–374 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Peter Adamson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper examines and compares two commentaries on Aristotle Metaphyics, Alpha Elatton. In the Arabic tradition this was considered to be the first book of the Metaphysics, and it accordingly acquired more importance than it is usually given today. After giving a brief resume of Elatton and its transmission into Arabic, the paper discusses the commentaries of Yaḥyá ibn ʿAdī, a Christian commentator of the Baghdad School, and by Averroes. it is argued that these two commentaries show rather different conceptions of Elatton as a text, and metaphysics as a science. In the final section Averroes' commentary on Elatton is shown to resonate strongly with Averroes' famous Decisive Treatise. Concluding remarks consider the question of how Averroes' project as a commentator related to that of the Baghdad School. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1537","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1537,"authors_free":[{"id":1764,"entry_id":1537,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}}],"entry_title":"Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton"},"abstract":"This paper examines and compares two commentaries on Aristotle Metaphyics, Alpha Elatton. In the Arabic tradition this was considered to be the first book of the Metaphysics, and it accordingly acquired more importance than it is usually given today. After giving a brief resume of Elatton and its transmission into Arabic, the paper discusses the commentaries of Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b, a Christian commentator of the Baghdad School, and by Averroes. it is argued that these two commentaries show rather different conceptions of Elatton as a text, and metaphysics as a science. In the final section Averroes' commentary on Elatton is shown to resonate strongly with Averroes' famous Decisive Treatise. Concluding remarks consider the question of how Averroes' project as a commentator related to that of the Baghdad School.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1537,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"21","issue":null,"pages":"343\u2013374"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Generazione verticale, generazione orizzontale: il principio di sinonimia nel Commento grande di Averroè al Libro Z della Metafisica di Aristotle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Chôra. Revue d’Études anciennes et médiévales |
| Volume | 7-8 |
| Issue | 2009-2010 |
| Pages | 133-62 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, Metaphysics, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Le but de cet article est d’analyser l’interprétation qu’Averroès propose de l’étude de la génération spontanée développée par Aristote dans le chapitre 9 du livre Z de la Métaphysique et montrer que pour Averroès le véritable enjeu de cette étude est celui de démontrer que l’agent et le produit de la génération ont une même forme. C’est cette thèse, en effet, qui d’après le Cordouan permet en dernière instance d’instaurer entre le monde céleste et le monde terrestre une causalité, pour ainsi dire, «perpendiculaire» qui sauve à la fois l’efficacité des causes secondes et celle de la cause première qui agit par l’intermédiaire des causes célestes. Ce nouveau cadre cosmologico-ontologique apparaît manifestement comme le produit d’une stratégie menée directement contre Avicenne, car le but ultime d’Averroès est de substituer sa propre théorie de l’Artisan divin à la théorie platonicienne de la création démiurgique, à laquelle il assimile la théorie avicennienne d’une donation des formes par une Intelligence cosmique. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5338","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5338,"authors_free":[{"id":6184,"entry_id":5338,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Generazione verticale, generazione orizzontale: il principio di sinonimia nel Commento grande di Averro\u00e8 al Libro Z della Metafisica di Aristotle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Generazione verticale, generazione orizzontale: il principio di sinonimia nel Commento grande di Averro\u00e8 al Libro Z della Metafisica di Aristotle"},"abstract":"Le but de cet article est d\u2019analyser l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation qu\u2019Averro\u00e8s propose de l\u2019\u00e9tude de la g\u00e9n\u00e9ration spontan\u00e9e d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e par Aristote dans le chapitre 9 du livre Z de la M\u00e9taphysique et montrer que pour Averro\u00e8s le v\u00e9ritable enjeu de cette \u00e9tude est celui de d\u00e9montrer que l\u2019agent et le produit de la g\u00e9n\u00e9ration ont une m\u00eame forme. C\u2019est cette th\u00e8se, en effet, qui d\u2019apr\u00e8s le Cordouan permet en derni\u00e8re instance d\u2019instaurer entre le monde c\u00e9leste et le monde terrestre une causalit\u00e9, pour ainsi dire, \u00abperpendiculaire\u00bb qui sauve \u00e0 la fois l\u2019efficacit\u00e9 des causes secondes et celle de la cause premi\u00e8re qui agit par l\u2019interm\u00e9diaire des causes c\u00e9lestes. Ce nouveau cadre cosmologico-ontologique appara\u00eet manifestement comme le produit d\u2019une strat\u00e9gie men\u00e9e directement contre Avicenne, car le but ultime d\u2019Averro\u00e8s est de substituer sa propre th\u00e9orie de l\u2019Artisan divin \u00e0 la th\u00e9orie platonicienne de la cr\u00e9ation d\u00e9miurgique, \u00e0 laquelle il assimile la th\u00e9orie avicennienne d\u2019une donation des formes par une Intelligence cosmique.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5338,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ch\u00f4ra. Revue d\u2019\u00c9tudes anciennes et m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":" 7-8","issue":"2009-2010","pages":"133-62"}},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metafísica II, 1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2005 |
| Journal | Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía |
| Volume | 29 |
| Pages | 13–28 |
| Categories | Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Rafael Ramón Guerrero |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes, stoutly influenced by Aristotle, affirmed the necessity of experience to increase all knowledge. Truth, thing's last nature, is obtained as time elapses and is only reached by accepting the predecessors's participation. Progress implies tradition and betterment: the former by impelling the development of both culture and intellect, and the latter as a result of a critical screening of diverse opinions, since it facilitates the knowledge of truth and the recognition of error. This scientific progress is reached as a consequence of effort and collaboration. Averroes sustained these ideas in his Commentary to Metaphysics II, 1, distinguishing four parts: a) Man's natural desire of truth and intellect's difficulty for reaching the most intelligible things; b) The predecessors's contribution, by their commentaries and clarifications, and the historical-progressive character of human reason; c) Philosophy, science of truth, as an investigation of complete reality; d) Truth as knowledge of cause, that is to say, the consideration of things as prove of their Author. Averroes also stated that both the Law, through Revelation, and philosophy, through reason, have the same objective, therefore it being compulsory to recur to previous contributions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1560","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1560,"authors_free":[{"id":1791,"entry_id":1560,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":844,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","free_first_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n","free_last_name":"Guerrero","norm_person":{"id":844,"first_name":"Rafael","last_name":"Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","full_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105670229X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73930694","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero"}}],"entry_title":"Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Veritas filia temporis en Averroes. Comentario a Metaf\u00edsica II, 1"},"abstract":"Averroes, stoutly influenced by Aristotle, affirmed the necessity of experience to increase all knowledge. Truth, thing's last nature, is obtained as time elapses and is only reached by accepting the predecessors's participation. Progress implies tradition and betterment: the former by impelling the development of both culture and intellect, and the latter as a result of a critical screening of diverse opinions, since it facilitates the knowledge of truth and the recognition of error. This scientific progress is reached as a consequence of effort and collaboration. Averroes sustained these ideas in his Commentary to Metaphysics II, 1, distinguishing four parts: a) Man's natural desire of truth and intellect's difficulty for reaching the most intelligible things; b) The predecessors's contribution, by their commentaries and clarifications, and the historical-progressive character of human reason; c) Philosophy, science of truth, as an investigation of complete reality; d) Truth as knowledge of cause, that is to say, the consideration of things as prove of their Author. Averroes also stated that both the Law, through Revelation, and philosophy, through reason, have the same objective, therefore it being compulsory to recur to previous contributions.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":844,"full_name":"Rafael Ram\u00f3n Guerrero","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1560,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"T\u00f3picos. Revista de Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"13\u201328"}},"sort":[2005]}
| Title | À propos du "fondamental" et de "l'essentiel" dans le commentaire d'Averroès sur la "métaphysique" d'Aristote |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Revue de Philosophie Ancienne |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 225-238 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Laurence Bauloye |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24354593 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5729","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5729,"authors_free":[{"id":6637,"entry_id":5729,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":814,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laurence Bauloye","free_first_name":"Laurence ","free_last_name":"Bauloye","norm_person":{"id":814,"first_name":"Laurence","last_name":"Bauloye","full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/152664165","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59337898","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laurence Bauloye"}}],"entry_title":"\u00c0 propos du \"fondamental\" et de \"l'essentiel\" dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la \"m\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"\u00c0 propos du \"fondamental\" et de \"l'essentiel\" dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la \"m\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24354593","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":814,"full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5729,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue de Philosophie Ancienne","volume":"13","issue":"2","pages":"225-238"}},"sort":[1995]}
| Title | Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentators on Per Se Accidents of Being qua Being and the Place of Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Iota |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 22 |
| Pages | 153–208 |
| Categories | Commentary, Metaphysics, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Laura Maria Castelli |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1765","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1765,"authors_free":[{"id":2036,"entry_id":1765,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1498,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laura Maria Castelli","free_first_name":"Laura Maria","free_last_name":"Castelli","norm_person":{"id":1498,"first_name":"Laura Maria","last_name":"Castelli","full_name":"Laura Maria Castelli","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143083910","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/161062580","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laura Maria Castelli"}}],"entry_title":"Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentators on Per Se Accidents of Being qua Being and the Place of Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Iota","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentators on Per Se Accidents of Being qua Being and the Place of Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Iota"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1498,"full_name":"Laura Maria Castelli","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1765,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"22","issue":null,"pages":"153\u2013208"}},"sort":["Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentators on Per Se Accidents of Being qua Being and the Place of Aristotle, Metaphysics, Book Iota"]}
| Title | Grek Şârihlerden İbn Rüşd'e Değin Aristoteles'in Theta (Θ) Kitabı'nın Hâricî Tarihi |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Turkish |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Sirnak University Journal of Divinity Faculty / Sirnak Üniversitesi Ilahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 23 |
| Pages | 469-486 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Metaphysics, Alexander of Aphrodisias |
| Author(s) | Abdürrezzak Sevindik |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The purpose of the article is to discuss the external history of the Book of Theta (Metaphysics IX) in the context of Ibn Rushd's commentaries on Metaphysics. Ibn Rushd interpreted the Book of Theta in Talkhīs mā ba'da al-ṭabī'ah based on its meaning and content. Ibn Rushd did not pursue the original composition of Metaphysics in Talkhīs mā ba'da al-ṭabī'ah. However, Ibn Rushd interpreted the Book of Theta in Tafsīr mā ba'da al-ṭabī'ah focusing on the expression and based on the original text. Ibn Rushd pursued the original composition of Metaphysics in Tafsīr mā ba'da al-ṭabī'ah. Thus, Ibn Rushd took advantage of Astat and Isḥāq b. Hunain's arabic translations of the Book of Theta in this interpretation process. Astat and Isḥāq b. Hunain are experts in the translation of Aristotle's works from Greek into Arabic. When Astat and Isḥāq b. Hunain's translation styles are looked at, it is understood that they adhered to the text word by word. In this respect, those translations supported the literary interpretation of Ibn Rushd. On the other hand, Ibn Rushd was influenced by the Greek commentator/Alexander of Aphrodisias in the interpretation of Theta. Alexander of Aphrodisias and Ibn Rushd's interpretation methods based on utterance are similar. In this respect, Ibn Rushd's Commentary of Theta reveals his Aristotelian approach. Makalenin gâyesi, Aristoteles'in Θ/Theta (Metafizik IX.) Kitabı'nın hâricî tarihini İbn Rüşd'ün Metafizik şerhleri bağlamında ortaya koymaktır. İbn Rüşd, Telhîsu Mâ ba'de't-tabî'a'da Theta Kitabı'nı mana ve mahiyetini temel alarak yorumlamış, Metafizik'i oluşturan kitapların özgün dizilimini takip etmemiştir. Buna karşın Tefsîru Mâ ba'de't-tabî'a'da Metafizik'in özgün dizilimini takip etmiş, Θ/Theta Kitabı'nı da orijinal metnini temel alarak ibâre odaklı yorumlamıştır. İbn Rüşd ibâre odaklı yaklaşımı dolayısıyla bu yorum sürecinde Θ/Theta Kitabı'nın Astat/Ustâz/Eustathius-İshak b. Huneyn (ö. M.S. 910) tarafından yapılmış Arapça çevirilerinden yararlanmıştır. Astat ve İshak b. Huneyn, Aristoteles'in eserlerinin doğrudan doğruya Grekçe'den Arapça'ya çevirilerinde ihtisaslaşmış mütercimlerdir. Astat'ın ve İshak b. Huneyn'in çeviri tavırlarına bakıldığında Grekçe metne kelime kelime bağlı kaldıkları görülür. Bu yönden söz konusu çeviriler, İbn Rüşd'ün lafzî yorumunu desteklemiştir. Diğer yandan İbn Rüşd, Θ/Theta Kitabı yorumunda Grek şârih İskender Afrodisî'den etkilenmiştir. İskender Afrodisî ile İbn Rüşd'ün lafzı temel alan şerh etme yöntemleri benzerdir. Bu bakımdan İbn Rüşd'ün Theta Kitabı Şerhi, onun saf Aristotelesçi yaklaşımını ortaya koyar |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5563","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5563,"authors_free":[{"id":6457,"entry_id":5563,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abd\u00fcrrezzak Sevindik","free_first_name":"Abd\u00fcrrezzak","free_last_name":"Sevindik","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Grek \u015e\u00e2rihlerden \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'e De\u011fin Aristoteles'in Theta (\u0398) Kitab\u0131'n\u0131n H\u00e2ric\u00ee Tarihi","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Grek \u015e\u00e2rihlerden \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'e De\u011fin Aristoteles'in Theta (\u0398) Kitab\u0131'n\u0131n H\u00e2ric\u00ee Tarihi"},"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to discuss the external history of the Book of Theta (Metaphysics IX) in the context of Ibn Rushd's commentaries on Metaphysics. Ibn Rushd interpreted the Book of Theta in Talkh\u012bs m\u0101 ba'da al-\u1e6dab\u012b'ah based on its meaning and content. Ibn Rushd did not pursue the original composition of Metaphysics in Talkh\u012bs m\u0101 ba'da al-\u1e6dab\u012b'ah. However, Ibn Rushd interpreted the Book of Theta in Tafs\u012br m\u0101 ba'da al-\u1e6dab\u012b'ah focusing on the expression and based on the original text. Ibn Rushd pursued the original composition of Metaphysics in Tafs\u012br m\u0101 ba'da al-\u1e6dab\u012b'ah. Thus, Ibn Rushd took advantage of Astat and Is\u1e25\u0101q b. Hunain's arabic translations of the Book of Theta in this interpretation process. Astat and Is\u1e25\u0101q b. Hunain are experts in the translation of Aristotle's works from Greek into Arabic. When Astat and Is\u1e25\u0101q b. Hunain's translation styles are looked at, it is understood that they adhered to the text word by word. In this respect, those translations supported the literary interpretation of Ibn Rushd. On the other hand, Ibn Rushd was influenced by the Greek commentator\/Alexander of Aphrodisias in the interpretation of Theta. Alexander of Aphrodisias and Ibn Rushd's interpretation methods based on utterance are similar. In this respect, Ibn Rushd's Commentary of Theta reveals his Aristotelian approach.\r\n\r\nMakalenin g\u00e2yesi, Aristoteles'in \u0398\/Theta (Metafizik IX.) Kitab\u0131'n\u0131n h\u00e2ric\u00ee tarihini \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'\u00fcn Metafizik \u015ferhleri ba\u011flam\u0131nda ortaya koymakt\u0131r. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd, Telh\u00eesu M\u00e2 ba'de't-tab\u00ee'a'da Theta Kitab\u0131'n\u0131 mana ve mahiyetini temel alarak yorumlam\u0131\u015f, Metafizik'i olu\u015fturan kitaplar\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcn dizilimini takip etmemi\u015ftir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n Tefs\u00eeru M\u00e2 ba'de't-tab\u00ee'a'da Metafizik'in \u00f6zg\u00fcn dizilimini takip etmi\u015f, \u0398\/Theta Kitab\u0131'n\u0131 da orijinal metnini temel alarak ib\u00e2re odakl\u0131 yorumlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd ib\u00e2re odakl\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu yorum s\u00fcrecinde \u0398\/Theta Kitab\u0131'n\u0131n Astat\/Ust\u00e2z\/Eustathius-\u0130shak b. Huneyn (\u00f6. M.S. 910) taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f Arap\u00e7a \u00e7evirilerinden yararlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Astat ve \u0130shak b. Huneyn, Aristoteles'in eserlerinin do\u011frudan do\u011fruya Grek\u00e7e'den Arap\u00e7a'ya \u00e7evirilerinde ihtisasla\u015fm\u0131\u015f m\u00fctercimlerdir. Astat'\u0131n ve \u0130shak b. Huneyn'in \u00e7eviri tav\u0131rlar\u0131na bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda Grek\u00e7e metne kelime kelime ba\u011fl\u0131 kald\u0131klar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr. Bu y\u00f6nden s\u00f6z konusu \u00e7eviriler, \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'\u00fcn lafz\u00ee yorumunu desteklemi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer yandan \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd, \u0398\/Theta Kitab\u0131 yorumunda Grek \u015f\u00e2rih \u0130skender Afrodis\u00ee'den etkilenmi\u015ftir. \u0130skender Afrodis\u00ee ile \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'\u00fcn lafz\u0131 temel alan \u015ferh etme y\u00f6ntemleri benzerdir. Bu bak\u0131mdan \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'\u00fcn Theta Kitab\u0131 \u015eerhi, onun saf Aristoteles\u00e7i yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyar","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Turkish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5563,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Sirnak University Journal of Divinity Faculty \/ Sirnak \u00dcniversitesi Ilahiyat Fak\u00fcltesi Dergisi","volume":"10","issue":"23","pages":"469-486"}},"sort":["Grek \u015e\u00e2rihlerden \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'e De\u011fin Aristoteles'in Theta (\u0398) Kitab\u0131'n\u0131n H\u00e2ric\u00ee Tarihi"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and Aquinas on God’s Causal Omniscience |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 595–614 |
| Categories | Thomas, Metaphysics, Aristotle, Commentary, Theology |
| Author(s) | Stephen Ogden |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5100","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5100,"authors_free":[{"id":5874,"entry_id":5100,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1681,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Stephen Ogden","free_first_name":"Stephen","free_last_name":"Ogden","norm_person":{"id":1681,"first_name":"Stephen R. ","last_name":"Ogden","full_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Stephen R. Ogden"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and Aquinas on God\u2019s Causal Omniscience","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and Aquinas on God\u2019s Causal Omniscience"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12312","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1681,"full_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5100,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"595\u2013614"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd and Aquinas on God\u2019s Causal Omniscience"]}
| Title | Il libro Epsilon della Metafisica di Aristotele nell’Epitome di Aevrroè (1126-1198) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale |
| Volume | 59 |
| Pages | 33–56 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Theology, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Carmela Baffioni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article deals with Averroes’s interpretation of Metaph. Ε 1, where Aristotle discusses the nature and object of metaphysics, as well as its place in the hierarchy of sciences. Among Averroes’s predecessors, al-Kindī seems to see a coincidence between metaphysics and theology, since God can be described as the “first cause of everything”. However, al-Fārābī and Avicenna discovered that “first philosophy” could be conceived as an ontology distinct from theology; moreover, they considered theology to be only a part of metaphysics, not even the most important one. In the Great Commentary on Metaphysics - where the Arabic translation of the work by the Jacobite monk Usṭāth is quoted, Averroes often just paraphrases the original passages. One may infer that theology in the strict sense is merely mentioned by way of example. In the Epitome of Metaphysics, the objects of metaphysics are “general” ones; metaphysics studies the “absolute being” and cannot be identified with theology as “pertaining to God”. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5124","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5124,"authors_free":[{"id":5899,"entry_id":5124,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":754,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Carmela Baffioni","free_first_name":"Carmela","free_last_name":"Baffioni","norm_person":{"id":754,"first_name":"Carmela","last_name":"Baffioni","full_name":"Carmela Baffioni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139175172","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/25088","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd139175172.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Carmela Baffioni"}}],"entry_title":"Il libro Epsilon della Metafisica di Aristotele nell\u2019Epitome di Aevrro\u00e8 (1126-1198)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Il libro Epsilon della Metafisica di Aristotele nell\u2019Epitome di Aevrro\u00e8 (1126-1198)"},"abstract":"This article deals with Averroes\u2019s interpretation of Metaph. \u0395 1, where Aristotle discusses the nature and object of metaphysics, as well as its place in the hierarchy of sciences. Among Averroes\u2019s predecessors, al-Kind\u012b seems to see a coincidence between metaphysics and theology, since God can be described as the \u201cfirst cause of everything\u201d. However, al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Avicenna discovered that \u201cfirst philosophy\u201d could be conceived as an ontology distinct from theology; moreover, they considered theology to be only a part of metaphysics, not even the most important one. In the Great Commentary on Metaphysics - where the Arabic translation of the work by the Jacobite monk Us\u1e6d\u0101th is quoted, Averroes often just paraphrases the original passages. One may infer that theology in the strict sense is merely mentioned by way of example. In the Epitome of Metaphysics, the objects of metaphysics are \u201cgeneral\u201d ones; metaphysics studies the \u201cabsolute being\u201d and cannot be identified with theology as \u201cpertaining to God\u201d.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/J.BPM.5.115828","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":754,"full_name":"Carmela Baffioni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5124,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"59","issue":"","pages":"33\u201356"}},"sort":["Il libro Epsilon della Metafisica di Aristotele nell\u2019Epitome di Aevrro\u00e8 (1126-1198)"]}
| Title | Prayers to the God of Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Zutot |
| Volume | 8 |
| Pages | 15–29 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Yehuda Halper |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In one incomplete manuscript of Aristotle’s Metaphysics with Averroes’ Long Commentary, a scribe has inserted short prayers, which seem to fit the genre of tefillot siyyum, to be read by the reader of the text upon completion of certain chapters of Book Δ of the Metaphysics. These prayers are thematically related to the content of Aristotle’s Metaphysics and Averroes’ commentary and accordingly suggest a philosophical interpretation of Judaism, God and the creation of the world that has as its centre-point metaphysics, as understood by Aristotle and his most important commentator, Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5314","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5314,"authors_free":[{"id":6145,"entry_id":5314,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Prayers to the God of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Prayers to the God of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"},"abstract":"In one incomplete manuscript of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics with Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary, a scribe has inserted short prayers, which seem to fit the genre of tefillot siyyum, to be read by the reader of the text upon completion of certain chapters of Book \u0394 of the Metaphysics. These prayers are thematically related to the content of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics and Averroes\u2019 commentary and accordingly suggest a philosophical interpretation of Judaism, God and the creation of the world that has as its centre-point metaphysics, as understood by Aristotle and his most important commentator, Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/18750214-12341242","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5314,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zutot","volume":"8 ","issue":"","pages":"15\u201329 "}},"sort":["Prayers to the God of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics: Tefillot siyyum for chapters of Book Delta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"]}
| Title | Rereading Metaphysics Ε2-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 109–135 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Commentary, Providence |
| Author(s) | Dustin Klinger |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In the fresh reading proposed here of the still not satisfactorily interpreted passages in Metaphysics Ε2-3, Aristotle emerges as making a case against determinism based on a robust notion of the accident. Accidental beings are uncaused causes and have their rightful place in Aristotle's ontology. The resulting physical indeterminism is here used as a litmus test for the exegetical practice of the great Commentator, Averroes, whose self-proclaimed, and later proverbial, loyalty to Aristotle's text will be shown to give way to idiosyncratic interpretations at times. His explanations of Metaphysics Ε2-3 are sparse and no less obscure than Aristotle's text. It is only when read together with his commentaries on the Physics, to which he explicitly refers twice in his Long commentary on Metaphysics Ε2-3, that a surprising picture emerges. Averroes recycles the notion of the accident, now reconceptualised in cosmological terms, and – putting it to the opposite use of Aristotle's – weaves it into an original theory of motion that integrates both supra- and sublunar realms into a deterministic framework of uninterrupted causal chains, thus safeguarding the principle of Divine providence. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5362","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5362,"authors_free":[{"id":6213,"entry_id":5362,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dustin Klinger","free_first_name":"Dustin ","free_last_name":"Klinger","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Rereading Metaphysics \u03952-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Rereading Metaphysics \u03952-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary"},"abstract":"In the fresh reading proposed here of the still not satisfactorily interpreted passages in Metaphysics \u03952-3, Aristotle emerges as making a case against determinism based on a robust notion of the accident. Accidental beings are uncaused causes and have their rightful place in Aristotle's ontology. The resulting physical indeterminism is here used as a litmus test for the exegetical practice of the great Commentator, Averroes, whose self-proclaimed, and later proverbial, loyalty to Aristotle's text will be shown to give way to idiosyncratic interpretations at times. His explanations of Metaphysics \u03952-3 are sparse and no less obscure than Aristotle's text. It is only when read together with his commentaries on the Physics, to which he explicitly refers twice in his Long commentary on Metaphysics \u03952-3, that a surprising picture emerges. Averroes recycles the notion of the accident, now reconceptualised in cosmological terms, and \u2013 putting it to the opposite use of Aristotle's \u2013 weaves it into an original theory of motion that integrates both supra- and sublunar realms into a deterministic framework of uninterrupted causal chains, thus safeguarding the principle of Divine providence.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0957423921000138","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":68,"category_name":"Providence","link":"bib?categories[]=Providence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5362,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy ","volume":"32 ","issue":"1","pages":"109\u2013135 "}},"sort":["Rereading Metaphysics \u03952-3: Aristotle's argument against determinism, and how Averroes twisted it in his Long Commentary"]}
| Title | Science première et science universelle dans le « Commentaire de la métaphysique » de saint Thomas d'Aquin |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Revue philosophique de Louvain |
| Volume | 63 |
| Pages | 41-96 |
| Categories | Aquinas, Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | James C. Doig |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26335766 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5679","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5679,"authors_free":[{"id":6583,"entry_id":5679,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1472,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"James C. Doig","free_first_name":"James C. ","free_last_name":"Doig","norm_person":{"id":1472,"first_name":"James Conroy","last_name":"Doig","full_name":"James Conroy Doig","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1147196222","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49352297","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=James Conroy Doig"}}],"entry_title":"Science premi\u00e8re et science universelle dans le \u00ab Commentaire de la m\u00e9taphysique \u00bb de saint Thomas d'Aquin","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Science premi\u00e8re et science universelle dans le \u00ab Commentaire de la m\u00e9taphysique \u00bb de saint Thomas d'Aquin"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26335766","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1472,"full_name":"James Conroy Doig","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5679,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue philosophique de Louvain","volume":"63","issue":"","pages":"41-96"}},"sort":["Science premi\u00e8re et science universelle dans le \u00ab Commentaire de la m\u00e9taphysique \u00bb de saint Thomas d'Aquin"]}
| Title | Some Remarks on Averroes’ Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 5–17 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Ilyas Altuner |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes, considered to be the greatest Aristotelian commentator in the Middle Ages, has written three different types of commentary on almost all the works of this great philosopher: short, middle and long. These commentaries have been translated into Latin and Hebrew in the early period, and profoundly influenced both Medieval Europe and Jewish thought for centuries. The effect of Averroes in the West was to spread the whole of Europe under the name of Latin Averroism. The text what you have consists of some remarks about the translation of the commentary on the ‘Book Alpha Meizon’, the second book of Averroes’ Tafsīr Mā Ba’d at-Ṭabī’a. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5186","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5186,"authors_free":[{"id":5975,"entry_id":5186,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ilyas Altuner","free_first_name":"Ilyas","free_last_name":"Altuner","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Some Remarks on Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Some Remarks on Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon"},"abstract":"Averroes, considered to be the greatest Aristotelian commentator in the Middle Ages, has written three different types of commentary on almost all the works of this great philosopher: short, middle and long. These commentaries have been translated into Latin and Hebrew in the early period, and profoundly influenced both Medieval Europe and Jewish thought for centuries. The effect of Averroes in the West was to spread the whole of Europe under the name of Latin Averroism. The text what you have consists of some remarks about the translation of the commentary on the \u2018Book Alpha Meizon\u2019, the second book of Averroes\u2019 Tafs\u012br M\u0101 Ba\u2019d at-\u1e6cab\u012b\u2019a.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5186,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review","volume":"1","issue":"1-2 ","pages":"5\u201317"}},"sort":["Some Remarks on Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon"]}
| Title | The Problem of the Souls of the Spheres from the Byzantine Commentaries on Aristotle Through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1962 |
| Journal | Dumbarton Oaks Papers |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 65-93 |
| Categories | Transmission, Metaphysics, Commentary, Cosmology |
| Author(s) | Harry A. Wolfson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/1291158 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2307/1291158 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5672","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5672,"authors_free":[{"id":6576,"entry_id":5672,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":881,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Harry A. Wolfson","free_first_name":"Harry A. ","free_last_name":" Wolfson","norm_person":{"id":881,"first_name":"Harry A.","last_name":"Wolfson","full_name":"Harry A. Wolfson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/123348323","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49315617","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd123348323.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Harry A. Wolfson"}}],"entry_title":"The Problem of the Souls of the Spheres from the Byzantine Commentaries on Aristotle Through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Problem of the Souls of the Spheres from the Byzantine Commentaries on Aristotle Through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1962","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/1291158","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1291158","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"}],"authors":[{"id":881,"full_name":"Harry A. Wolfson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5672,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dumbarton Oaks Papers","volume":"16","issue":"","pages":"65-93"}},"sort":["The Problem of the Souls of the Spheres from the Byzantine Commentaries on Aristotle Through the Arabs and St. Thomas to Kepler"]}
| Title | Twenty-Nine Hebrew Glosses on Averroes‘ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Aleph |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 335–353 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Mauro Zonta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Jewish engagement with Aristotle's Metaphysics in Hebrew began in the thirteenth century when the text was presented in Hebrew encyclopedias; it continued with a number of translations in the thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries. The study of Hebrew philosophical texts often resulted in supercommentaries on them. In this study I present a hitherto unnoticed work, preserved in a unique Oxford manuscript, that bears witness to the study of the Metaphysics. Consisting of twenty-nine short comments or glosses on key passages of Averroes' Middle Commentary on books Alpha minor and Beta, as well as two passages from the Middle Commentary on book Theta, it can be described as a kind of supercommentary on Averroes. The glosses as preserved in the manuscript were apparently collected by an unknown redactor from works of two or more authors, whom I try to identify. One of them may be R. Gershon, the father of Levi ben Gershon (1288–1344). An edition of the 29 glosses and, for comparison, several glosses on logic by R. Gershon, are also presented. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/aleph.17.2.0335 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2979/aleph.17.2.0335 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5204","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5204,"authors_free":[{"id":5998,"entry_id":5204,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"Twenty-Nine Hebrew Glosses on Averroes\u2018 Middle Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Twenty-Nine Hebrew Glosses on Averroes\u2018 Middle Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"},"abstract":"Jewish engagement with Aristotle's Metaphysics in Hebrew began in the thirteenth century when the text was presented in Hebrew encyclopedias; it continued with a number of translations in the thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries. The study of Hebrew philosophical texts often resulted in supercommentaries on them. In this study I present a hitherto unnoticed work, preserved in a unique Oxford manuscript, that bears witness to the study of the Metaphysics. Consisting of twenty-nine short comments or glosses on key passages of Averroes' Middle Commentary on books Alpha minor and Beta, as well as two passages from the Middle Commentary on book Theta, it can be described as a kind of supercommentary on Averroes. The glosses as preserved in the manuscript were apparently collected by an unknown redactor from works of two or more authors, whom I try to identify. One of them may be R. Gershon, the father of Levi ben Gershon (1288\u20131344). An edition of the 29 glosses and, for comparison, several glosses on logic by R. Gershon, are also presented.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/aleph.17.2.0335","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/aleph.17.2.0335","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5204,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Aleph","volume":"17","issue":"2","pages":"335\u2013353"}},"sort":["Twenty-Nine Hebrew Glosses on Averroes\u2018 Middle Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics"]}