Du corporel au spirituel. Averroès et la question d'un sens « agent », 2014
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Du corporel au spirituel. Averroès et la question d'un sens « agent »
Type Article
Language French
Date 2014
Journal Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie
Volume 61
Issue 1
Pages 19–42
Categories De anima
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2014","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2014,"authors_free":[{"id":2455,"entry_id":2014,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Du corporel au spirituel. Averro\u00e8s et la question d'un sens \u00ab agent \u00bb","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Du corporel au spirituel. Averro\u00e8s et la question d'un sens \u00ab agent \u00bb"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2014,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"61","issue":"1","pages":"19\u201342"}},"sort":[2014]}

S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme, 2011
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme
Type Article
Language French
Date 2011
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 21
Issue 2
Pages 215–247
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1535","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1535,"authors_free":[{"id":1762,"entry_id":1535,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"},"abstract":"The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1535,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"215\u2013247"}},"sort":[2011]}

Vision béatifique et séparation de l'intellect au début du XIVe siècle. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?, 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Vision béatifique et séparation de l'intellect au début du XIVe siècle. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie
Volume 53
Pages 310–342
Categories Averroism, Aquinas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"296","_score":null,"_source":{"id":296,"authors_free":[{"id":433,"entry_id":296,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":296,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"53","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013342"}},"sort":[2006]}

Théorie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averroès, 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Théorie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averroès
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica
Volume 98
Pages 467–487
Categories Psychology
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1487","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1487,"authors_free":[{"id":1709,"entry_id":1487,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1487,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica","volume":"98","issue":null,"pages":"467\u2013487"}},"sort":[2006]}

"... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé , 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title "... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph
Volume 59
Pages 69–96
Categories Psychology, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1488","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1488,"authors_free":[{"id":1710,"entry_id":1488,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1488,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"59","issue":null,"pages":"69\u201396"}},"sort":[2006]}

Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averroïsme de Thomas de Strasbourg, 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averroïsme de Thomas de Strasbourg
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques
Volume 90
Issue 4
Pages 641–663
Categories Averroism
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
In his commnentary on the Sentences (book II, dist. XVII, q. 1), doubtless read at Paris between 1335 and 1337, Thomas de Strasbourg († 1357) contests in a dense and singular fashion the noetic of Averroes and the Averroists. His reading depends at once upon two figures. First, Giles of Rome, who denounces in the theory of the continuatio a feature that makes of the image the second subject-substrate of the intelligible. Second, Durandus of Saint-Pourçain, who with Hervé Nédellec, opposes to the Commentator a novel perspective of the subject applied to man. This paper studies this theoretical pro-duction as it bears witness to the dynamism of the quarrel over Averroism and which enlists Thomas of Strasbourg in this long chronicle in which the modern notion of sub-jectivity is worked out.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1716","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1716,"authors_free":[{"id":1981,"entry_id":1716,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg"},"abstract":"In his commnentary on the Sentences (book II, dist. XVII, q. 1), doubtless read at Paris between 1335 and 1337, Thomas de Strasbourg (\u2020 1357) contests in a dense and singular fashion the noetic of Averroes and the Averroists. His reading depends at once upon two figures. First, Giles of Rome, who denounces in the theory of the continuatio a feature that makes of the image the second subject-substrate of the intelligible. Second, Durandus of Saint-Pour\u00e7ain, who with Herv\u00e9 N\u00e9dellec, opposes to the Commentator a novel perspective of the subject applied to man. This paper studies this theoretical pro-duction as it bears witness to the dynamism of the quarrel over Averroism and which enlists Thomas of Strasbourg in this long chronicle in which the modern notion of sub-jectivity is worked out.","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1716,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"90","issue":"4","pages":"641\u2013663"}},"sort":[2006]}

Averroès a-t-il inventé une théorie des deux sujets de la pensée, 2005
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Averroès a-t-il inventé une théorie des deux sujets de la pensée
Type Article
Language French
Date 2005
Journal Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía
Volume 29
Pages 53–86
Categories Psychology
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
According to Thomas Aquinas, Averroes's philosophy of the mind is characterized by the doctrine of the "double subject", which is found in his Long Commentary on the De anima. As it is well-known, Averroes asserts that the intelligibles in act or theoretical intelligibles may be said to have two subjects (duo subiecta): the material intellect and the image of the cogitative power, whose connection allows individual human beings to think. We try here to know if it is properly a "theory" produced by Averroes. By analysing all the texts dealing with it, we both intend to justify the use of the term "subiectum" applied to the image and to show that the expression "duo subiecta", equivocal from a lexical point of view, is totally clear from a conceptual one. The doctrine of the double subject is certainly a thesis of Averroes consequent with his latter stage of his philosophy and his new teaching on the material intellect, but it is not, contrary to the interpretation of his Latin opponents, the doctrine of the two "substrates" which would make man the second place of the intelligible in act.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1559","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1559,"authors_free":[{"id":1790,"entry_id":1559,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e"},"abstract":"According to Thomas Aquinas, Averroes's philosophy of the mind is characterized by the doctrine of the \"double subject\", which is found in his Long Commentary on the De anima. As it is well-known, Averroes asserts that the intelligibles in act or theoretical intelligibles may be said to have two subjects (duo subiecta): the material intellect and the image of the cogitative power, whose connection allows individual human beings to think. We try here to know if it is properly a \"theory\" produced by Averroes. By analysing all the texts dealing with it, we both intend to justify the use of the term \"subiectum\" applied to the image and to show that the expression \"duo subiecta\", equivocal from a lexical point of view, is totally clear from a conceptual one. The doctrine of the double subject is certainly a thesis of Averroes consequent with his latter stage of his philosophy and his new teaching on the material intellect, but it is not, contrary to the interpretation of his Latin opponents, the doctrine of the two \"substrates\" which would make man the second place of the intelligible in act.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1559,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"T\u00f3picos. Revista de Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"53\u201386"}},"sort":[2005]}

Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averroès, 2001
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averroès
Type Article
Language French
Date 2001
Journal Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Volume 68
Pages 310–348
Categories Averroism
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
L'article examine la reprise que le « prince des Averroïstes » Jean de Jandun (ca. 1285–1328) fait de cette phrase délicate d'Averroès, tirée de son Grand Commentaire du De anima d'Aristote : « forte igitur philosophia invenitur in maiori parte subiecti in omni tempore ». On cherche à montrer par l'analyse des textes que l'interprétation du maître ès arts s'écarte radicalement de la pensée du Cordouan qu'il prétend suivre. Tandis qu'Averroès suppose l'existence continue d'au moins un philosophe dans le monde, Jean de Jandun, rejetant comme irréaliste l'idée d'un homme parfait en qui s'incarnerait tout le savoir, et tributaire d'une erreur de traduction arabo-latine qui donne « sujet » pour « lieu », soutient qu'il n'y a chaque fois de perfection que si l'on totalise tous les savoirs particuliers des différents penseurs en activité sur la terre. Autrement dit, la philosophie est parfaite, certes, mais il n'y a pas de philosophe parfait. C'est coniunctim que la science est achevée, et non pas divisim. Un tel constat, qui rapproche l'analyse de Jean de celle menée par Dante au début de sa Monarchia, permet deux révisions : d'une part, l'idée d'un « averroïsme » latin réactionnaire, se contentant de répéter les paroles du maître, est à revoir ; d'autre part, cela signifie qu'il n'y a pas chez Jean les bases théoriques de l'idéal éthico-intellectualiste dont l'historiographie moderne assure qu'il en fut le champion parisien.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"295","_score":null,"_source":{"id":295,"authors_free":[{"id":432,"entry_id":295,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"L'article examine la reprise que le \u00ab prince des Averro\u00efstes \u00bb Jean de Jandun (ca. 1285\u20131328) fait de cette phrase d\u00e9licate d'Averro\u00e8s, tir\u00e9e de son Grand Commentaire du De anima d'Aristote : \u00ab forte igitur philosophia invenitur in maiori parte subiecti in omni tempore \u00bb. On cherche \u00e0 montrer par l'analyse des textes que l'interpr\u00e9tation du ma\u00eetre \u00e8s arts s'\u00e9carte radicalement de la pens\u00e9e du Cordouan qu'il pr\u00e9tend suivre. Tandis qu'Averro\u00e8s suppose l'existence continue d'au moins un philosophe dans le monde, Jean de Jandun, rejetant comme irr\u00e9aliste l'id\u00e9e d'un homme parfait en qui s'incarnerait tout le savoir, et tributaire d'une erreur de traduction arabo-latine qui donne \u00ab sujet \u00bb pour \u00ab lieu \u00bb, soutient qu'il n'y a chaque fois de perfection que si l'on totalise tous les savoirs particuliers des diff\u00e9rents penseurs en activit\u00e9 sur la terre. Autrement dit, la philosophie est parfaite, certes, mais il n'y a pas de philosophe parfait. C'est coniunctim que la science est achev\u00e9e, et non pas divisim. Un tel constat, qui rapproche l'analyse de Jean de celle men\u00e9e par Dante au d\u00e9but de sa Monarchia, permet deux r\u00e9visions : d'une part, l'id\u00e9e d'un \u00ab averro\u00efsme \u00bb latin r\u00e9actionnaire, se contentant de r\u00e9p\u00e9ter les paroles du ma\u00eetre, est \u00e0 revoir ; d'autre part, cela signifie qu'il n'y a pas chez Jean les bases th\u00e9oriques de l'id\u00e9al \u00e9thico-intellectualiste dont l'historiographie moderne assure qu'il en fut le champion parisien.","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":295,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de th\u00e9ologie et philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"68","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013348"}},"sort":[2001]}

"... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé , 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title "... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph
Volume 59
Pages 69–96
Categories Psychology, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1488","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1488,"authors_free":[{"id":1710,"entry_id":1488,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1488,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"59","issue":null,"pages":"69\u201396"}},"sort":["\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "]}

Averroès a-t-il inventé une théorie des deux sujets de la pensée, 2005
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Averroès a-t-il inventé une théorie des deux sujets de la pensée
Type Article
Language French
Date 2005
Journal Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía
Volume 29
Pages 53–86
Categories Psychology
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
According to Thomas Aquinas, Averroes's philosophy of the mind is characterized by the doctrine of the "double subject", which is found in his Long Commentary on the De anima. As it is well-known, Averroes asserts that the intelligibles in act or theoretical intelligibles may be said to have two subjects (duo subiecta): the material intellect and the image of the cogitative power, whose connection allows individual human beings to think. We try here to know if it is properly a "theory" produced by Averroes. By analysing all the texts dealing with it, we both intend to justify the use of the term "subiectum" applied to the image and to show that the expression "duo subiecta", equivocal from a lexical point of view, is totally clear from a conceptual one. The doctrine of the double subject is certainly a thesis of Averroes consequent with his latter stage of his philosophy and his new teaching on the material intellect, but it is not, contrary to the interpretation of his Latin opponents, the doctrine of the two "substrates" which would make man the second place of the intelligible in act.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1559","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1559,"authors_free":[{"id":1790,"entry_id":1559,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e"},"abstract":"According to Thomas Aquinas, Averroes's philosophy of the mind is characterized by the doctrine of the \"double subject\", which is found in his Long Commentary on the De anima. As it is well-known, Averroes asserts that the intelligibles in act or theoretical intelligibles may be said to have two subjects (duo subiecta): the material intellect and the image of the cogitative power, whose connection allows individual human beings to think. We try here to know if it is properly a \"theory\" produced by Averroes. By analysing all the texts dealing with it, we both intend to justify the use of the term \"subiectum\" applied to the image and to show that the expression \"duo subiecta\", equivocal from a lexical point of view, is totally clear from a conceptual one. The doctrine of the double subject is certainly a thesis of Averroes consequent with his latter stage of his philosophy and his new teaching on the material intellect, but it is not, contrary to the interpretation of his Latin opponents, the doctrine of the two \"substrates\" which would make man the second place of the intelligible in act.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1559,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"T\u00f3picos. Revista de Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"53\u201386"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e"]}

Du corporel au spirituel. Averroès et la question d'un sens « agent », 2014
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Du corporel au spirituel. Averroès et la question d'un sens « agent »
Type Article
Language French
Date 2014
Journal Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie
Volume 61
Issue 1
Pages 19–42
Categories De anima
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2014","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2014,"authors_free":[{"id":2455,"entry_id":2014,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Du corporel au spirituel. Averro\u00e8s et la question d'un sens \u00ab agent \u00bb","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Du corporel au spirituel. Averro\u00e8s et la question d'un sens \u00ab agent \u00bb"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2014,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"61","issue":"1","pages":"19\u201342"}},"sort":["Du corporel au spirituel. Averro\u00e8s et la question d'un sens \u00ab agent \u00bb"]}

Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averroïsme de Thomas de Strasbourg, 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averroïsme de Thomas de Strasbourg
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques
Volume 90
Issue 4
Pages 641–663
Categories Averroism
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
In his commnentary on the Sentences (book II, dist. XVII, q. 1), doubtless read at Paris between 1335 and 1337, Thomas de Strasbourg († 1357) contests in a dense and singular fashion the noetic of Averroes and the Averroists. His reading depends at once upon two figures. First, Giles of Rome, who denounces in the theory of the continuatio a feature that makes of the image the second subject-substrate of the intelligible. Second, Durandus of Saint-Pourçain, who with Hervé Nédellec, opposes to the Commentator a novel perspective of the subject applied to man. This paper studies this theoretical pro-duction as it bears witness to the dynamism of the quarrel over Averroism and which enlists Thomas of Strasbourg in this long chronicle in which the modern notion of sub-jectivity is worked out.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1716","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1716,"authors_free":[{"id":1981,"entry_id":1716,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg"},"abstract":"In his commnentary on the Sentences (book II, dist. XVII, q. 1), doubtless read at Paris between 1335 and 1337, Thomas de Strasbourg (\u2020 1357) contests in a dense and singular fashion the noetic of Averroes and the Averroists. His reading depends at once upon two figures. First, Giles of Rome, who denounces in the theory of the continuatio a feature that makes of the image the second subject-substrate of the intelligible. Second, Durandus of Saint-Pour\u00e7ain, who with Herv\u00e9 N\u00e9dellec, opposes to the Commentator a novel perspective of the subject applied to man. This paper studies this theoretical pro-duction as it bears witness to the dynamism of the quarrel over Averroism and which enlists Thomas of Strasbourg in this long chronicle in which the modern notion of sub-jectivity is worked out.","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1716,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"90","issue":"4","pages":"641\u2013663"}},"sort":["Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg"]}

Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averroès, 2001
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averroès
Type Article
Language French
Date 2001
Journal Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Volume 68
Pages 310–348
Categories Averroism
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
L'article examine la reprise que le « prince des Averroïstes » Jean de Jandun (ca. 1285–1328) fait de cette phrase délicate d'Averroès, tirée de son Grand Commentaire du De anima d'Aristote : « forte igitur philosophia invenitur in maiori parte subiecti in omni tempore ». On cherche à montrer par l'analyse des textes que l'interprétation du maître ès arts s'écarte radicalement de la pensée du Cordouan qu'il prétend suivre. Tandis qu'Averroès suppose l'existence continue d'au moins un philosophe dans le monde, Jean de Jandun, rejetant comme irréaliste l'idée d'un homme parfait en qui s'incarnerait tout le savoir, et tributaire d'une erreur de traduction arabo-latine qui donne « sujet » pour « lieu », soutient qu'il n'y a chaque fois de perfection que si l'on totalise tous les savoirs particuliers des différents penseurs en activité sur la terre. Autrement dit, la philosophie est parfaite, certes, mais il n'y a pas de philosophe parfait. C'est coniunctim que la science est achevée, et non pas divisim. Un tel constat, qui rapproche l'analyse de Jean de celle menée par Dante au début de sa Monarchia, permet deux révisions : d'une part, l'idée d'un « averroïsme » latin réactionnaire, se contentant de répéter les paroles du maître, est à revoir ; d'autre part, cela signifie qu'il n'y a pas chez Jean les bases théoriques de l'idéal éthico-intellectualiste dont l'historiographie moderne assure qu'il en fut le champion parisien.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"295","_score":null,"_source":{"id":295,"authors_free":[{"id":432,"entry_id":295,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"L'article examine la reprise que le \u00ab prince des Averro\u00efstes \u00bb Jean de Jandun (ca. 1285\u20131328) fait de cette phrase d\u00e9licate d'Averro\u00e8s, tir\u00e9e de son Grand Commentaire du De anima d'Aristote : \u00ab forte igitur philosophia invenitur in maiori parte subiecti in omni tempore \u00bb. On cherche \u00e0 montrer par l'analyse des textes que l'interpr\u00e9tation du ma\u00eetre \u00e8s arts s'\u00e9carte radicalement de la pens\u00e9e du Cordouan qu'il pr\u00e9tend suivre. Tandis qu'Averro\u00e8s suppose l'existence continue d'au moins un philosophe dans le monde, Jean de Jandun, rejetant comme irr\u00e9aliste l'id\u00e9e d'un homme parfait en qui s'incarnerait tout le savoir, et tributaire d'une erreur de traduction arabo-latine qui donne \u00ab sujet \u00bb pour \u00ab lieu \u00bb, soutient qu'il n'y a chaque fois de perfection que si l'on totalise tous les savoirs particuliers des diff\u00e9rents penseurs en activit\u00e9 sur la terre. Autrement dit, la philosophie est parfaite, certes, mais il n'y a pas de philosophe parfait. C'est coniunctim que la science est achev\u00e9e, et non pas divisim. Un tel constat, qui rapproche l'analyse de Jean de celle men\u00e9e par Dante au d\u00e9but de sa Monarchia, permet deux r\u00e9visions : d'une part, l'id\u00e9e d'un \u00ab averro\u00efsme \u00bb latin r\u00e9actionnaire, se contentant de r\u00e9p\u00e9ter les paroles du ma\u00eetre, est \u00e0 revoir ; d'autre part, cela signifie qu'il n'y a pas chez Jean les bases th\u00e9oriques de l'id\u00e9al \u00e9thico-intellectualiste dont l'historiographie moderne assure qu'il en fut le champion parisien.","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":295,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de th\u00e9ologie et philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"68","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013348"}},"sort":["Perfection de la philosophie ou philosophe parfait?. Jean de Jandun lecteur d'Averro\u00e8s"]}

S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme, 2011
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme
Type Article
Language French
Date 2011
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 21
Issue 2
Pages 215–247
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1535","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1535,"authors_free":[{"id":1762,"entry_id":1535,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"},"abstract":"The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1535,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"215\u2013247"}},"sort":["S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"]}

Théorie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averroès, 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Théorie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averroès
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica
Volume 98
Pages 467–487
Categories Psychology
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1487","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1487,"authors_free":[{"id":1709,"entry_id":1487,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1487,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista di Filosofia neo-scolastica","volume":"98","issue":null,"pages":"467\u2013487"}},"sort":["Th\u00e9orie de l'intellect et organisation politique chez Dante et Averro\u00e8s"]}

Vision béatifique et séparation de l'intellect au début du XIVe siècle. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?, 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title Vision béatifique et séparation de l'intellect au début du XIVe siècle. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie
Volume 53
Pages 310–342
Categories Averroism, Aquinas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"296","_score":null,"_source":{"id":296,"authors_free":[{"id":433,"entry_id":296,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":296,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"53","issue":null,"pages":"310\u2013342"}},"sort":["Vision b\u00e9atifique et s\u00e9paration de l'intellect au d\u00e9but du XIVe si\u00e8cle. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?"]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 1