{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1718","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1718,"authors_free":[{"id":1983,"entry_id":1718,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes, y la cr\u00edtica de Avicena","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes, y la cr\u00edtica de Avicena"},"abstract":"In his refutation of the philosophers, the Muslim theologian Al-Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee argues for the incoherency of their doctrines on divine causality, and focuses his attacks on Avicenna\u2019s doctrine of the distinction between being necessary by itself and being possible by itself, but necessary because of another. When Averroes refutes, on his turn, Al-Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019s work, he often points out that the doctrine refuted by al-Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee belongs to Avicenna, not to Aristotle, and distances himself from the former.","btype":3,"date":"2003","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1718,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista espa\u00f1ola de filosof\u00eda medieval. Miscellanea Mediaevalia en honor de Joaquin Lomba Fuentes","volume":"10","issue":null,"pages":"127\u2013138"}},"sort":["Averroes, y la cr\u00edtica de Avicena"]}