| Title | Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del "faṣl al-maqāl" de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Estudios de Asia y Africa |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | Nr. 1 (153) |
| Pages | 99-133 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relación entre filosofía y religión. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Faṣl al-maqāl. En este artículo propondré una ruta de interpretación ligeramente distinta de la que otros intérpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendré que puede ser leído como un tratado de argumentación donde Averroes se ocupa no únicamente de mostrar la armonía entre la ley religiosa y la filosofía, sino también de esbozar una teoría de la argumentación sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epistémico de las creencias religiosas. A controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Faṣl al-maqāl. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24368078 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5583","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5583,"authors_free":[{"id":6481,"entry_id":5583,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavie","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes"},"abstract":"Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relaci\u00f3n entre filosof\u00eda y religi\u00f3n. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. En este art\u00edculo propondr\u00e9 una ruta de interpretaci\u00f3n ligeramente distinta de la que otros int\u00e9rpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendr\u00e9 que puede ser le\u00eddo como un tratado de argumentaci\u00f3n donde Averroes se ocupa no \u00fanicamente de mostrar la armon\u00eda entre la ley religiosa y la filosof\u00eda, sino tambi\u00e9n de esbozar una teor\u00eda de la argumentaci\u00f3n sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epist\u00e9mico de las creencias religiosas. \r\n\r\nA controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"Spanish","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24368078","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5583,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Estudios de Asia y Africa","volume":"49","issue":"Nr. 1 (153)","pages":"99-133"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del "faṣl al-maqāl" de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Estudios de Asia y Africa |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | Nr. 1 (153) |
| Pages | 99-133 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relación entre filosofía y religión. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Faṣl al-maqāl. En este artículo propondré una ruta de interpretación ligeramente distinta de la que otros intérpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendré que puede ser leído como un tratado de argumentación donde Averroes se ocupa no únicamente de mostrar la armonía entre la ley religiosa y la filosofía, sino también de esbozar una teoría de la argumentación sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epistémico de las creencias religiosas. A controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Faṣl al-maqāl. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24368078 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5583","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5583,"authors_free":[{"id":6481,"entry_id":5583,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavie","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes"},"abstract":"Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relaci\u00f3n entre filosof\u00eda y religi\u00f3n. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. En este art\u00edculo propondr\u00e9 una ruta de interpretaci\u00f3n ligeramente distinta de la que otros int\u00e9rpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendr\u00e9 que puede ser le\u00eddo como un tratado de argumentaci\u00f3n donde Averroes se ocupa no \u00fanicamente de mostrar la armon\u00eda entre la ley religiosa y la filosof\u00eda, sino tambi\u00e9n de esbozar una teor\u00eda de la argumentaci\u00f3n sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epist\u00e9mico de las creencias religiosas. \r\n\r\nA controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"Spanish","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24368078","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5583,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Estudios de Asia y Africa","volume":"49","issue":"Nr. 1 (153)","pages":"99-133"}},"sort":["Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes"]}