| Title | Porphyry’s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Studia graeco-arabica |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107–124 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Charles Manekin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry’s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes’ paraphrase or “Middle Commentary”, since Porphyry’s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes’ paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5010,"authors_free":[{"id":5747,"entry_id":5010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":679,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles Manekin","free_first_name":"Charles","free_last_name":"Manekin","norm_person":{"id":679,"first_name":"Charles H.","last_name":"Manekin","full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133803554","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/112521012","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles H. Manekin"}}],"entry_title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"},"abstract":"Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry\u2019s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes\u2019 paraphrase or \u201cMiddle Commentary\u201d, since Porphyry\u2019s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes\u2019 paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12871\/978883339614917","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":679,"full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"107\u2013124"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mediterranea |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 131–155 |
| Categories | Averroism, Siger of Brabant, Boethius, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Pilar Herráiz Oliva |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The reception of Aristotelian philosophy with Averroes’s commentaries in the thirteenth-century Latin world promoted a new way of understanding natural philosophy and its method. A very special case among the readers of such commentaries, mostly found at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris, are the so-called averroistae. What these averroistae actually were is still a matter of discussion in current scholarship, whereas there is kind of consensus regarding the main exponents of this philosophical movement, namely Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this topic by providing a re-definition of Averroism in the 13th century. To do this, I will analyse some of the most important works of the aforementioned authors in an attempt to clarify the specificity of their philosophical program. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5009","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5009,"authors_free":[{"id":5746,"entry_id":5009,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Pilar Herr\u00e1iz Oliva","free_first_name":"Pilar","free_last_name":"Herr\u00e1iz Oliva","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited"},"abstract":"The reception of Aristotelian philosophy with Averroes\u2019s commentaries in the thirteenth-century Latin world promoted a new way of understanding natural philosophy and its method. A very special case among the readers of such commentaries, mostly found at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris, are the so-called averroistae. What these averroistae actually were is still a matter of discussion in current scholarship, whereas there is kind of consensus regarding the main exponents of this philosophical movement, namely Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this topic by providing a re-definition of Averroism in the 13th century. To do this, I will analyse some of the most important works of the aforementioned authors in an attempt to clarify the specificity of their philosophical program.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21071\/mijtk.v6i.12947 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5009,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediterranea","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"131\u2013155"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | La filosofia medievale tra antichità ed età moderna. Saggi in Memoria di Francesco Del Punta |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2017 |
| Publication Place | Firenze |
| Publisher | SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo |
| Categories | Thomas, Ockham, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Amos Bertolacci , Agostino Paravicini Bagliani |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Il volume pubblica le relazioni presentate nella giornata in commemorazione di Francesco Del Punta (1941-2013), organizzata a Firenze dalla Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medioevo Latino e dalla Scuola Normale Superiore nel novembre 2014, assieme ai saggi che altri studiosi hanno voluto tributare alla memoria del loro maestro, collega ed amico. L'insieme dei contributi rispecchia la molteplicità degli interessi culturali di Francesco Del Punta, incentrati sulla filosofia del Medio Evo, ma aperti a comprendere anche l'antichità greca e l'età moderna. I saggi interpretano compiutamente i due versanti del compito dello storico della filosofia medievale, così come inteso da Del Punta: la filologia e la critica testuale, da una parte, tese a stabilire testi di sicura affidabilità; il commento e l'analisi dottrinale, dall'altra, finalizzati a sondare la profondità di pensiero che le opere contengono. Nella prospettiva interculturale e multilinguistica cara a Del Punta, e da lui promossa con tutte le sue energie di studioso, docente, e diffusore di sapere, i testi analizzati spaziano dal greco, all'arabo e al latino come lingue di comunicazione filosofica e veicoli di scambio di conoscenza in epoca medievale. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5190","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5190,"authors_free":[{"id":5979,"entry_id":5190,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":815,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Amos Bertolacci","free_first_name":"Amos","free_last_name":"Bertolacci","norm_person":{"id":815,"first_name":"Amos","last_name":"Bertolacci","full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/156504006","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61846437","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Amos Bertolacci"}},{"id":5980,"entry_id":5190,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":652,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Agostino Paravicini Bagliani","free_first_name":"Agostino ","free_last_name":"Paravicini Bagliani","norm_person":{"id":652,"first_name":"Agostino","last_name":"Paravicini Bagliani","full_name":"Agostino Paravicini Bagliani","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137538464","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/111201239","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd137538464.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Agostino Paravicini Bagliani"}}],"entry_title":"La filosofia medievale tra antichit\u00e0 ed et\u00e0 moderna. Saggi in Memoria di Francesco Del Punta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La filosofia medievale tra antichit\u00e0 ed et\u00e0 moderna. Saggi in Memoria di Francesco Del Punta"},"abstract":"Il volume pubblica le relazioni presentate nella giornata in commemorazione di Francesco Del Punta (1941-2013), organizzata a Firenze dalla Societ\u00e0 Internazionale per lo Studio del Medioevo Latino e dalla Scuola Normale Superiore nel novembre 2014, assieme ai saggi che altri studiosi hanno voluto tributare alla memoria del loro maestro, collega ed amico. L'insieme dei contributi rispecchia la molteplicit\u00e0 degli interessi culturali di Francesco Del Punta, incentrati sulla filosofia del Medio Evo, ma aperti a comprendere anche l'antichit\u00e0 greca e l'et\u00e0 moderna. I saggi interpretano compiutamente i due versanti del compito dello storico della filosofia medievale, cos\u00ec come inteso da Del Punta: la filologia e la critica testuale, da una parte, tese a stabilire testi di sicura affidabilit\u00e0; il commento e l'analisi dottrinale, dall'altra, finalizzati a sondare la profondit\u00e0 di pensiero che le opere contengono. Nella prospettiva interculturale e multilinguistica cara a Del Punta, e da lui promossa con tutte le sue energie di studioso, docente, e diffusore di sapere, i testi analizzati spaziano dal greco, all'arabo e al latino come lingue di comunicazione filosofica e veicoli di scambio di conoscenza in epoca medievale.","btype":4,"date":"2017","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":3,"category_name":"Ockham","link":"bib?categories[]=Ockham"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":815,"full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","role":2},{"id":652,"full_name":"Agostino Paravicini Bagliani","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5190,"pubplace":"Firenze","publisher":"SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | Taxinomie topique. La classification thémistéenne des lieux chez Boèce, Averroès et Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2004 |
| Published in | Words, Texts and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea. Studies on the sources, contents and influences of Islamic civilization and Arabic philosophy and science. Dedicated to Gerhard Endress on his sixty-fifth birthday |
| Pages | 245–257 |
| Categories | Themistius, Boethius, Physics |
| Author(s) | Ahmad Hasnawi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1563","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1563,"authors_free":[{"id":1794,"entry_id":1563,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":788,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","free_first_name":"Ahmad","free_last_name":"Hasnawi","norm_person":{"id":788,"first_name":"Ahmad","last_name":"Hasnawi","full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1011618869","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29672431","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ahmad Hasnawi"}}],"entry_title":"Taxinomie topique. La classification th\u00e9mist\u00e9enne des lieux chez Bo\u00e8ce, Averro\u00e8s et Ab\u016b l-Barak\u0101t al-Baghd\u0101d\u012b","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Taxinomie topique. La classification th\u00e9mist\u00e9enne des lieux chez Bo\u00e8ce, Averro\u00e8s et Ab\u016b l-Barak\u0101t al-Baghd\u0101d\u012b"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2004","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[{"id":788,"full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1563,"section_of":83,"pages":"245\u2013257","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":83,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Words, Texts and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea. Studies on the sources, contents and influences of Islamic civilization and Arabic philosophy and science. Dedicated to Gerhard Endress on his sixty-fifth birthday","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2004","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2004","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":83,"pubplace":"Leuven","publisher":"Peeters","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2004]}
| Title | La filosofia medievale tra antichità ed età moderna. Saggi in Memoria di Francesco Del Punta |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2017 |
| Publication Place | Firenze |
| Publisher | SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo |
| Categories | Thomas, Ockham, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Amos Bertolacci , Agostino Paravicini Bagliani |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Il volume pubblica le relazioni presentate nella giornata in commemorazione di Francesco Del Punta (1941-2013), organizzata a Firenze dalla Società Internazionale per lo Studio del Medioevo Latino e dalla Scuola Normale Superiore nel novembre 2014, assieme ai saggi che altri studiosi hanno voluto tributare alla memoria del loro maestro, collega ed amico. L'insieme dei contributi rispecchia la molteplicità degli interessi culturali di Francesco Del Punta, incentrati sulla filosofia del Medio Evo, ma aperti a comprendere anche l'antichità greca e l'età moderna. I saggi interpretano compiutamente i due versanti del compito dello storico della filosofia medievale, così come inteso da Del Punta: la filologia e la critica testuale, da una parte, tese a stabilire testi di sicura affidabilità; il commento e l'analisi dottrinale, dall'altra, finalizzati a sondare la profondità di pensiero che le opere contengono. Nella prospettiva interculturale e multilinguistica cara a Del Punta, e da lui promossa con tutte le sue energie di studioso, docente, e diffusore di sapere, i testi analizzati spaziano dal greco, all'arabo e al latino come lingue di comunicazione filosofica e veicoli di scambio di conoscenza in epoca medievale. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5190","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5190,"authors_free":[{"id":5979,"entry_id":5190,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":815,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Amos Bertolacci","free_first_name":"Amos","free_last_name":"Bertolacci","norm_person":{"id":815,"first_name":"Amos","last_name":"Bertolacci","full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/156504006","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61846437","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Amos Bertolacci"}},{"id":5980,"entry_id":5190,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":652,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Agostino Paravicini Bagliani","free_first_name":"Agostino ","free_last_name":"Paravicini Bagliani","norm_person":{"id":652,"first_name":"Agostino","last_name":"Paravicini Bagliani","full_name":"Agostino Paravicini Bagliani","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137538464","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/111201239","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd137538464.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Agostino Paravicini Bagliani"}}],"entry_title":"La filosofia medievale tra antichit\u00e0 ed et\u00e0 moderna. Saggi in Memoria di Francesco Del Punta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La filosofia medievale tra antichit\u00e0 ed et\u00e0 moderna. Saggi in Memoria di Francesco Del Punta"},"abstract":"Il volume pubblica le relazioni presentate nella giornata in commemorazione di Francesco Del Punta (1941-2013), organizzata a Firenze dalla Societ\u00e0 Internazionale per lo Studio del Medioevo Latino e dalla Scuola Normale Superiore nel novembre 2014, assieme ai saggi che altri studiosi hanno voluto tributare alla memoria del loro maestro, collega ed amico. L'insieme dei contributi rispecchia la molteplicit\u00e0 degli interessi culturali di Francesco Del Punta, incentrati sulla filosofia del Medio Evo, ma aperti a comprendere anche l'antichit\u00e0 greca e l'et\u00e0 moderna. I saggi interpretano compiutamente i due versanti del compito dello storico della filosofia medievale, cos\u00ec come inteso da Del Punta: la filologia e la critica testuale, da una parte, tese a stabilire testi di sicura affidabilit\u00e0; il commento e l'analisi dottrinale, dall'altra, finalizzati a sondare la profondit\u00e0 di pensiero che le opere contengono. Nella prospettiva interculturale e multilinguistica cara a Del Punta, e da lui promossa con tutte le sue energie di studioso, docente, e diffusore di sapere, i testi analizzati spaziano dal greco, all'arabo e al latino come lingue di comunicazione filosofica e veicoli di scambio di conoscenza in epoca medievale.","btype":4,"date":"2017","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":3,"category_name":"Ockham","link":"bib?categories[]=Ockham"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":815,"full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","role":2},{"id":652,"full_name":"Agostino Paravicini Bagliani","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5190,"pubplace":"Firenze","publisher":"SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["La filosofia medievale tra antichit\u00e0 ed et\u00e0 moderna. Saggi in Memoria di Francesco Del Punta"]}
| Title | Porphyry’s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Studia graeco-arabica |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107–124 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Charles Manekin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry’s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes’ paraphrase or “Middle Commentary”, since Porphyry’s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes’ paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5010,"authors_free":[{"id":5747,"entry_id":5010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":679,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles Manekin","free_first_name":"Charles","free_last_name":"Manekin","norm_person":{"id":679,"first_name":"Charles H.","last_name":"Manekin","full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133803554","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/112521012","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles H. Manekin"}}],"entry_title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"},"abstract":"Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry\u2019s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes\u2019 paraphrase or \u201cMiddle Commentary\u201d, since Porphyry\u2019s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes\u2019 paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12871\/978883339614917","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":679,"full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"107\u2013124"}},"sort":["Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"]}
| Title | Taxinomie topique. La classification thémistéenne des lieux chez Boèce, Averroès et Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2004 |
| Published in | Words, Texts and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea. Studies on the sources, contents and influences of Islamic civilization and Arabic philosophy and science. Dedicated to Gerhard Endress on his sixty-fifth birthday |
| Pages | 245–257 |
| Categories | Themistius, Boethius, Physics |
| Author(s) | Ahmad Hasnawi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1563","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1563,"authors_free":[{"id":1794,"entry_id":1563,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":788,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","free_first_name":"Ahmad","free_last_name":"Hasnawi","norm_person":{"id":788,"first_name":"Ahmad","last_name":"Hasnawi","full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1011618869","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29672431","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ahmad Hasnawi"}}],"entry_title":"Taxinomie topique. La classification th\u00e9mist\u00e9enne des lieux chez Bo\u00e8ce, Averro\u00e8s et Ab\u016b l-Barak\u0101t al-Baghd\u0101d\u012b","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Taxinomie topique. La classification th\u00e9mist\u00e9enne des lieux chez Bo\u00e8ce, Averro\u00e8s et Ab\u016b l-Barak\u0101t al-Baghd\u0101d\u012b"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2004","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[{"id":788,"full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1563,"section_of":83,"pages":"245\u2013257","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":83,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Words, Texts and Concepts Cruising the Mediterranean Sea. Studies on the sources, contents and influences of Islamic civilization and Arabic philosophy and science. Dedicated to Gerhard Endress on his sixty-fifth birthday","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2004","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2004","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":83,"pubplace":"Leuven","publisher":"Peeters","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Taxinomie topique. La classification th\u00e9mist\u00e9enne des lieux chez Bo\u00e8ce, Averro\u00e8s et Ab\u016b l-Barak\u0101t al-Baghd\u0101d\u012b"]}
| Title | Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mediterranea |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 131–155 |
| Categories | Averroism, Siger of Brabant, Boethius, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Pilar Herráiz Oliva |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The reception of Aristotelian philosophy with Averroes’s commentaries in the thirteenth-century Latin world promoted a new way of understanding natural philosophy and its method. A very special case among the readers of such commentaries, mostly found at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris, are the so-called averroistae. What these averroistae actually were is still a matter of discussion in current scholarship, whereas there is kind of consensus regarding the main exponents of this philosophical movement, namely Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this topic by providing a re-definition of Averroism in the 13th century. To do this, I will analyse some of the most important works of the aforementioned authors in an attempt to clarify the specificity of their philosophical program. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5009","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5009,"authors_free":[{"id":5746,"entry_id":5009,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Pilar Herr\u00e1iz Oliva","free_first_name":"Pilar","free_last_name":"Herr\u00e1iz Oliva","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited"},"abstract":"The reception of Aristotelian philosophy with Averroes\u2019s commentaries in the thirteenth-century Latin world promoted a new way of understanding natural philosophy and its method. A very special case among the readers of such commentaries, mostly found at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris, are the so-called averroistae. What these averroistae actually were is still a matter of discussion in current scholarship, whereas there is kind of consensus regarding the main exponents of this philosophical movement, namely Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this topic by providing a re-definition of Averroism in the 13th century. To do this, I will analyse some of the most important works of the aforementioned authors in an attempt to clarify the specificity of their philosophical program.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21071\/mijtk.v6i.12947 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5009,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediterranea","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"131\u2013155"}},"sort":["Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited"]}