| Title | Porphyry’s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Studia graeco-arabica |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107–124 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Charles Manekin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry’s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes’ paraphrase or “Middle Commentary”, since Porphyry’s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes’ paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5010,"authors_free":[{"id":5747,"entry_id":5010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":679,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles Manekin","free_first_name":"Charles","free_last_name":"Manekin","norm_person":{"id":679,"first_name":"Charles H.","last_name":"Manekin","full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133803554","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/112521012","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles H. Manekin"}}],"entry_title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"},"abstract":"Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry\u2019s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes\u2019 paraphrase or \u201cMiddle Commentary\u201d, since Porphyry\u2019s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes\u2019 paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12871\/978883339614917","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":679,"full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"107\u2013124"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mediterranea |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 131–155 |
| Categories | Averroism, Siger of Brabant, Boethius, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Pilar Herráiz Oliva |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The reception of Aristotelian philosophy with Averroes’s commentaries in the thirteenth-century Latin world promoted a new way of understanding natural philosophy and its method. A very special case among the readers of such commentaries, mostly found at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris, are the so-called averroistae. What these averroistae actually were is still a matter of discussion in current scholarship, whereas there is kind of consensus regarding the main exponents of this philosophical movement, namely Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this topic by providing a re-definition of Averroism in the 13th century. To do this, I will analyse some of the most important works of the aforementioned authors in an attempt to clarify the specificity of their philosophical program. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5009","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5009,"authors_free":[{"id":5746,"entry_id":5009,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Pilar Herr\u00e1iz Oliva","free_first_name":"Pilar","free_last_name":"Herr\u00e1iz Oliva","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited"},"abstract":"The reception of Aristotelian philosophy with Averroes\u2019s commentaries in the thirteenth-century Latin world promoted a new way of understanding natural philosophy and its method. A very special case among the readers of such commentaries, mostly found at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris, are the so-called averroistae. What these averroistae actually were is still a matter of discussion in current scholarship, whereas there is kind of consensus regarding the main exponents of this philosophical movement, namely Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this topic by providing a re-definition of Averroism in the 13th century. To do this, I will analyse some of the most important works of the aforementioned authors in an attempt to clarify the specificity of their philosophical program.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21071\/mijtk.v6i.12947 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5009,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediterranea","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"131\u2013155"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Boethius's "Works on the Topics" |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1974 |
| Journal | Vivarium |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 77-93 |
| Categories | Dialectic, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Eleonore Stump |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/42569673 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5704","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5704,"authors_free":[{"id":6612,"entry_id":5704,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1879,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Eleonore Stump","free_first_name":"Eleonore","free_last_name":"Stump","norm_person":{"id":1879,"first_name":"Eleonore ","last_name":"Stump","full_name":"Eleonore Stump","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172390435","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Eleonore Stump"}}],"entry_title":"Boethius's \"Works on the Topics\"","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Boethius's \"Works on the Topics\""},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1974","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/42569673","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":79,"category_name":"Dialectic","link":"bib?categories[]=Dialectic"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":1879,"full_name":"Eleonore Stump","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5704,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vivarium","volume":"12 ","issue":"2 ","pages":"77-93 "}},"sort":[1974]}
| Title | Boethius's "Works on the Topics" |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1974 |
| Journal | Vivarium |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 77-93 |
| Categories | Dialectic, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Eleonore Stump |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/42569673 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5704","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5704,"authors_free":[{"id":6612,"entry_id":5704,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1879,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Eleonore Stump","free_first_name":"Eleonore","free_last_name":"Stump","norm_person":{"id":1879,"first_name":"Eleonore ","last_name":"Stump","full_name":"Eleonore Stump","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172390435","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Eleonore Stump"}}],"entry_title":"Boethius's \"Works on the Topics\"","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Boethius's \"Works on the Topics\""},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1974","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/42569673","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":79,"category_name":"Dialectic","link":"bib?categories[]=Dialectic"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":1879,"full_name":"Eleonore Stump","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5704,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vivarium","volume":"12 ","issue":"2 ","pages":"77-93 "}},"sort":["Boethius's \"Works on the Topics\""]}
| Title | Porphyry’s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Studia graeco-arabica |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107–124 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Charles Manekin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry’s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes’ paraphrase or “Middle Commentary”, since Porphyry’s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes’ paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5010,"authors_free":[{"id":5747,"entry_id":5010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":679,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles Manekin","free_first_name":"Charles","free_last_name":"Manekin","norm_person":{"id":679,"first_name":"Charles H.","last_name":"Manekin","full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133803554","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/112521012","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles H. Manekin"}}],"entry_title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"},"abstract":"Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry\u2019s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes\u2019 paraphrase or \u201cMiddle Commentary\u201d, since Porphyry\u2019s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes\u2019 paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12871\/978883339614917","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":679,"full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"107\u2013124"}},"sort":["Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"]}
| Title | Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mediterranea |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 131–155 |
| Categories | Averroism, Siger of Brabant, Boethius, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Pilar Herráiz Oliva |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The reception of Aristotelian philosophy with Averroes’s commentaries in the thirteenth-century Latin world promoted a new way of understanding natural philosophy and its method. A very special case among the readers of such commentaries, mostly found at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris, are the so-called averroistae. What these averroistae actually were is still a matter of discussion in current scholarship, whereas there is kind of consensus regarding the main exponents of this philosophical movement, namely Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this topic by providing a re-definition of Averroism in the 13th century. To do this, I will analyse some of the most important works of the aforementioned authors in an attempt to clarify the specificity of their philosophical program. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5009","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5009,"authors_free":[{"id":5746,"entry_id":5009,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Pilar Herr\u00e1iz Oliva","free_first_name":"Pilar","free_last_name":"Herr\u00e1iz Oliva","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited"},"abstract":"The reception of Aristotelian philosophy with Averroes\u2019s commentaries in the thirteenth-century Latin world promoted a new way of understanding natural philosophy and its method. A very special case among the readers of such commentaries, mostly found at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris, are the so-called averroistae. What these averroistae actually were is still a matter of discussion in current scholarship, whereas there is kind of consensus regarding the main exponents of this philosophical movement, namely Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia. The aim of this paper is to shed light on this topic by providing a re-definition of Averroism in the 13th century. To do this, I will analyse some of the most important works of the aforementioned authors in an attempt to clarify the specificity of their philosophical program.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21071\/mijtk.v6i.12947 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5009,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediterranea","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"131\u2013155"}},"sort":["Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited"]}