| Title | Averroès: La cohérence de la vérité |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Sciences humaines (Auxerre, France) |
| Volume | Les Essentiels (HS15) |
| Pages | 19-21 |
| Categories | Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Ali Benmakhlouf |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5799","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5799,"authors_free":[{"id":6720,"entry_id":5799,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":774,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Benmakhlouf","norm_person":{"id":774,"first_name":"Ali","last_name":"Benmakhlouf","full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120589850","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24737587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ali Benmakhlouf"}}],"entry_title":" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.3917\/sh.hs15.0019","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":774,"full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5799,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Sciences humaines (Auxerre, France)","volume":"Les Essentiels (HS15)","issue":"","pages":"19-21"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Philosophy East and West |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 960-972 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Kirk Lougheed , Joshua Lee Harris |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5795","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5795,"authors_free":[{"id":6715,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1683,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kirk Lougheed","free_first_name":"Kirk ","free_last_name":"Lougheed","norm_person":{"id":1683,"first_name":"Kirk","last_name":"Lougheed","full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080701206","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Kirk Lougheed"}},{"id":6716,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1901,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","free_first_name":"Joshua Lee ","free_last_name":"Harris","norm_person":{"id":1901,"first_name":"Joshua Lee ","last_name":"Harris","full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080676589","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Joshua Lee Harris"}}],"entry_title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge"},"abstract":"The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1683,"full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","role":1},{"id":1901,"full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5795,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy East and West","volume":"72","issue":"4","pages":"960-972"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | La vérité dans l'épistémè islamique post-averroecien. La théorie de la vérité chez Averroès pourra-t-elle contribuer au dialogue interculturel contemporain? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Science et Esprit, Revue de philosophie et de théologie |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 177-196 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Mounia Aît Kabboura |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes (Ibn Rushd 1126-1198), philosopher and magistrate, came into conflict with the 'Maliki' jurists and the 'Ash'rite Salafist' theologians of his time who held to the traditionalist and literalist thought according to which the truth is explicit in the revealed text so that it does not require interpretation. Averroes developed a new conception of truth whose goal was to reconcile two different orders of truth. These are variously described as revelation and reason, or faith and the faculty of human judgment, or the truth through others rather than the truth through oneself. By deepening the rationalism of Aristotle, he brought to light the new intellectual conditions that Maimonides, among the Jews, and Thomas Aquinas, among the Catholics, took advantage of to develop new theological systems. All medieval thought was marked by the following duality: revelation versus rationality (hermeneutical and philosophical), or in other words by a desire to harmonise the given revealed according to the necessary constraints of reason. Can the theory of truth in Averroes contribute to better, flexible, and peaceful integration of Muslims in plural societies? This text proposes to examine theory of truth of Averroes presented in 'Fasl al-Maqâl' ('The Decisive Treaty') and 'Tahâfut al tahafut' ('The Incoherence of Inconsistency'), and then to examine the conditions of the abandonment of this theory in the post-Averroes Islamic episteme that retained only the truth of revelation. Finally, this text will show that Averroes's conception of truth is fundamentally a philosophy of recognition driven by three universal principles: (1) understanding the others in their own system of reference, (2) understanding freedom as a responsibility in the search for truth, (3) recognising the right to be different through respect for others. (edited) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5570","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5570,"authors_free":[{"id":6464,"entry_id":5570,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mounia A\u00eet Kabboura","free_first_name":"Mounia A\u00eet","free_last_name":"Kabboura","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"La v\u00e9rit\u00e9 dans l'\u00e9pist\u00e9m\u00e8 islamique post-averroecien. La th\u00e9orie de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 chez Averro\u00e8s pourra-t-elle contribuer au dialogue interculturel contemporain?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La v\u00e9rit\u00e9 dans l'\u00e9pist\u00e9m\u00e8 islamique post-averroecien. La th\u00e9orie de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 chez Averro\u00e8s pourra-t-elle contribuer au dialogue interculturel contemporain?"},"abstract":"Averroes (Ibn Rushd 1126-1198), philosopher and magistrate, came into conflict with the 'Maliki' jurists and the 'Ash'rite Salafist' theologians of his time who held to the traditionalist and literalist thought according to which the truth is explicit in the revealed text so that it does not require interpretation. Averroes developed a new conception of truth whose goal was to reconcile two different orders of truth. These are variously described as revelation and reason, or faith and the faculty of human judgment, or the truth through others rather than the truth through oneself. By deepening the rationalism of Aristotle, he brought to light the new intellectual conditions that Maimonides, among the Jews, and Thomas Aquinas, among the Catholics, took advantage of to develop new theological systems. All medieval thought was marked by the following duality: revelation versus rationality (hermeneutical and philosophical), or in other words by a desire to harmonise the given revealed according to the necessary constraints of reason. Can the theory of truth in Averroes contribute to better, flexible, and peaceful integration of Muslims in plural societies? This text proposes to examine theory of truth of Averroes presented in 'Fasl al-Maq\u00e2l' ('The Decisive Treaty') and 'Tah\u00e2fut al tahafut' ('The Incoherence of Inconsistency'), and then to examine the conditions of the abandonment of this theory in the post-Averroes Islamic episteme that retained only the truth of revelation. Finally, this text will show that Averroes's conception of truth is fundamentally a philosophy of recognition driven by three universal principles: (1) understanding the others in their own system of reference, (2) understanding freedom as a responsibility in the search for truth, (3) recognising the right to be different through respect for others. (edited)","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5570,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Science et Esprit, Revue de philosophie et de th\u00e9ologie","volume":"73","issue":" 1-2","pages":"177-196"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Received Wisdom: The Use of Authority in Medieval Islamic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement |
| Volume | 89 |
| Pages | 99-115 |
| Categories | Law, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Peter Adamson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this paper I challenge the notion that medieval philosophy was characterized by strict adherence to authority. In particular, I argue that to the contrary, self-consciously critical reflection on authority was a widespread intellectual virtue in the Islamic world. The contrary vice, called ‘taqlīd’, was considered appropriate only for those outside the scholarly elite. I further suggest that this idea was originally developed in the context of Islamic law and was then passed on to authors who worked within the philosophical tradition. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5811","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5811,"authors_free":[{"id":6732,"entry_id":5811,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter ","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}}],"entry_title":"Received Wisdom: The Use of Authority in Medieval Islamic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Received Wisdom: The Use of Authority in Medieval Islamic Philosophy"},"abstract":"In this paper I challenge the notion that medieval philosophy was characterized by strict adherence to authority. In particular, I argue that to the contrary, self-consciously critical reflection on authority was a widespread intellectual virtue in the Islamic world. The contrary vice, called \u2018taql\u012bd\u2019, was considered appropriate only for those outside the scholarly elite. I further suggest that this idea was originally developed in the context of Islamic law and was then passed on to authors who worked within the philosophical tradition.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1358246121000011","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5811,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement","volume":"89","issue":"","pages":"99-115"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Averroes: la semilla sembrada en busca de la verdad posible |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Papeles (En Línea) |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 24 |
| Categories | Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Enrique Ferrer-Corredor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5810","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5810,"authors_free":[{"id":6731,"entry_id":5810,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1904,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Enrique Ferrer-Corredor","free_first_name":"Enrique","free_last_name":"Ferrer-Corredor","norm_person":{"id":1904,"first_name":"Enrique","last_name":"Ferrer-Corredor","full_name":"Enrique Ferrer-Corredor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132200910","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Enrique Ferrer-Corredor"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes: la semilla sembrada en busca de la verdad posible","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes: la semilla sembrada en busca de la verdad posible"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":1904,"full_name":"Enrique Ferrer-Corredor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5810,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Papeles (En L\u00ednea)","volume":"12","issue":"24","pages":""}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Persian |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 69-84 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Averroism, Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Ali Ghorbani , Fath ali Akbari |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Faṣl al-maqāl, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5579","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5579,"authors_free":[{"id":6476,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Ghorbani","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Ghorbani","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6477,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fath ali Akbari","free_first_name":"Fath ali ","free_last_name":"Akbari","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"},"abstract":"In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Persian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5579,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"5","issue":"12","pages":"69-84"}},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del "faṣl al-maqāl" de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Estudios de Asia y Africa |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | Nr. 1 (153) |
| Pages | 99-133 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relación entre filosofía y religión. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Faṣl al-maqāl. En este artículo propondré una ruta de interpretación ligeramente distinta de la que otros intérpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendré que puede ser leído como un tratado de argumentación donde Averroes se ocupa no únicamente de mostrar la armonía entre la ley religiosa y la filosofía, sino también de esbozar una teoría de la argumentación sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epistémico de las creencias religiosas. A controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Faṣl al-maqāl. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24368078 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5583","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5583,"authors_free":[{"id":6481,"entry_id":5583,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavie","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes"},"abstract":"Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relaci\u00f3n entre filosof\u00eda y religi\u00f3n. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. En este art\u00edculo propondr\u00e9 una ruta de interpretaci\u00f3n ligeramente distinta de la que otros int\u00e9rpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendr\u00e9 que puede ser le\u00eddo como un tratado de argumentaci\u00f3n donde Averroes se ocupa no \u00fanicamente de mostrar la armon\u00eda entre la ley religiosa y la filosof\u00eda, sino tambi\u00e9n de esbozar una teor\u00eda de la argumentaci\u00f3n sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epist\u00e9mico de las creencias religiosas. \r\n\r\nA controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"Spanish","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24368078","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5583,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Estudios de Asia y Africa","volume":"49","issue":"Nr. 1 (153)","pages":"99-133"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | خطاب ابن رشد بين حق المعرفة وضغوط الخطاب النقيض / The Discourse of Ibn Rushd Between Knowledge and Constraint |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 6-35 |
| Categories | Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Nasr Hamid Abu-Zeid |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/521841 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2307/521841 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5731","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5731,"authors_free":[{"id":6639,"entry_id":5731,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nasr Hamid Abu-Zeid","free_first_name":"Nasr Hamid","free_last_name":" Abu-Zeid","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0628\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0631\u0641\u0629 \u0648\u0636\u063a\u0648\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0642\u064a\u0636 \/ The Discourse of Ibn Rushd Between Knowledge and Constraint","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0628\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0631\u0641\u0629 \u0648\u0636\u063a\u0648\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0642\u064a\u0636 \/ The Discourse of Ibn Rushd Between Knowledge and Constraint"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"Arabic","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/521841","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/521841","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5731,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics","volume":"16","issue":"","pages":"6-35"}},"sort":[1996]}
| Title | アヴェロエス研究 - 二重真理説 |
| Translation | Averroes Research - The Double-Truth-Theory |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Japanese |
| Date | 1982 |
| Journal | Kinki Daigaku Kyōyōbu Kenkyū Kiyō |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 157-172 |
| Categories | Law, Epistemology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Chisato Tanaka |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5533","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5533,"authors_free":[{"id":6426,"entry_id":5533,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1837,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chisato Tanaka","free_first_name":"Chisato","free_last_name":"Tanaka","norm_person":{"id":1837,"first_name":"Chisato","last_name":"Tanaka","full_name":"Chisato Tanaka","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Chisato Tanaka"}}],"entry_title":"\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Averroes Research - The Double-Truth-Theory","main_title":{"title":"\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1982","language":"Japanese","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1837,"full_name":"Chisato Tanaka","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5533,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Kinki Daigaku Ky\u014dy\u014dbu Kenky\u016b Kiy\u014d","volume":"13 ","issue":"3","pages":"157-172"}},"sort":[1982]}
| Title | Averroès: La cohérence de la vérité |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Sciences humaines (Auxerre, France) |
| Volume | Les Essentiels (HS15) |
| Pages | 19-21 |
| Categories | Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Ali Benmakhlouf |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5799","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5799,"authors_free":[{"id":6720,"entry_id":5799,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":774,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Benmakhlouf","norm_person":{"id":774,"first_name":"Ali","last_name":"Benmakhlouf","full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120589850","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24737587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ali Benmakhlouf"}}],"entry_title":" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.3917\/sh.hs15.0019","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":774,"full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5799,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Sciences humaines (Auxerre, France)","volume":"Les Essentiels (HS15)","issue":"","pages":"19-21"}},"sort":[" Averro\u00e8s: La coh\u00e9rence de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9"]}
| Title | A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Persian |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 69-84 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Averroism, Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Ali Ghorbani , Fath ali Akbari |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Faṣl al-maqāl, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5579","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5579,"authors_free":[{"id":6476,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Ghorbani","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Ghorbani","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6477,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fath ali Akbari","free_first_name":"Fath ali ","free_last_name":"Akbari","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"},"abstract":"In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Persian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5579,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"5","issue":"12","pages":"69-84"}},"sort":["A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"]}
| Title | Averroes: la semilla sembrada en busca de la verdad posible |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Papeles (En Línea) |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 24 |
| Categories | Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Enrique Ferrer-Corredor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5810","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5810,"authors_free":[{"id":6731,"entry_id":5810,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1904,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Enrique Ferrer-Corredor","free_first_name":"Enrique","free_last_name":"Ferrer-Corredor","norm_person":{"id":1904,"first_name":"Enrique","last_name":"Ferrer-Corredor","full_name":"Enrique Ferrer-Corredor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132200910","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Enrique Ferrer-Corredor"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes: la semilla sembrada en busca de la verdad posible","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes: la semilla sembrada en busca de la verdad posible"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":1904,"full_name":"Enrique Ferrer-Corredor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5810,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Papeles (En L\u00ednea)","volume":"12","issue":"24","pages":""}},"sort":["Averroes: la semilla sembrada en busca de la verdad posible"]}
| Title | Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Philosophy East and West |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 960-972 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Kirk Lougheed , Joshua Lee Harris |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5795","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5795,"authors_free":[{"id":6715,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1683,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kirk Lougheed","free_first_name":"Kirk ","free_last_name":"Lougheed","norm_person":{"id":1683,"first_name":"Kirk","last_name":"Lougheed","full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080701206","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Kirk Lougheed"}},{"id":6716,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1901,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","free_first_name":"Joshua Lee ","free_last_name":"Harris","norm_person":{"id":1901,"first_name":"Joshua Lee ","last_name":"Harris","full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080676589","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Joshua Lee Harris"}}],"entry_title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge"},"abstract":"The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1683,"full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","role":1},{"id":1901,"full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5795,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy East and West","volume":"72","issue":"4","pages":"960-972"}},"sort":["Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge"]}
| Title | La vérité dans l'épistémè islamique post-averroecien. La théorie de la vérité chez Averroès pourra-t-elle contribuer au dialogue interculturel contemporain? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Science et Esprit, Revue de philosophie et de théologie |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 177-196 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Mounia Aît Kabboura |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes (Ibn Rushd 1126-1198), philosopher and magistrate, came into conflict with the 'Maliki' jurists and the 'Ash'rite Salafist' theologians of his time who held to the traditionalist and literalist thought according to which the truth is explicit in the revealed text so that it does not require interpretation. Averroes developed a new conception of truth whose goal was to reconcile two different orders of truth. These are variously described as revelation and reason, or faith and the faculty of human judgment, or the truth through others rather than the truth through oneself. By deepening the rationalism of Aristotle, he brought to light the new intellectual conditions that Maimonides, among the Jews, and Thomas Aquinas, among the Catholics, took advantage of to develop new theological systems. All medieval thought was marked by the following duality: revelation versus rationality (hermeneutical and philosophical), or in other words by a desire to harmonise the given revealed according to the necessary constraints of reason. Can the theory of truth in Averroes contribute to better, flexible, and peaceful integration of Muslims in plural societies? This text proposes to examine theory of truth of Averroes presented in 'Fasl al-Maqâl' ('The Decisive Treaty') and 'Tahâfut al tahafut' ('The Incoherence of Inconsistency'), and then to examine the conditions of the abandonment of this theory in the post-Averroes Islamic episteme that retained only the truth of revelation. Finally, this text will show that Averroes's conception of truth is fundamentally a philosophy of recognition driven by three universal principles: (1) understanding the others in their own system of reference, (2) understanding freedom as a responsibility in the search for truth, (3) recognising the right to be different through respect for others. (edited) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5570","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5570,"authors_free":[{"id":6464,"entry_id":5570,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mounia A\u00eet Kabboura","free_first_name":"Mounia A\u00eet","free_last_name":"Kabboura","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"La v\u00e9rit\u00e9 dans l'\u00e9pist\u00e9m\u00e8 islamique post-averroecien. La th\u00e9orie de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 chez Averro\u00e8s pourra-t-elle contribuer au dialogue interculturel contemporain?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La v\u00e9rit\u00e9 dans l'\u00e9pist\u00e9m\u00e8 islamique post-averroecien. La th\u00e9orie de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 chez Averro\u00e8s pourra-t-elle contribuer au dialogue interculturel contemporain?"},"abstract":"Averroes (Ibn Rushd 1126-1198), philosopher and magistrate, came into conflict with the 'Maliki' jurists and the 'Ash'rite Salafist' theologians of his time who held to the traditionalist and literalist thought according to which the truth is explicit in the revealed text so that it does not require interpretation. Averroes developed a new conception of truth whose goal was to reconcile two different orders of truth. These are variously described as revelation and reason, or faith and the faculty of human judgment, or the truth through others rather than the truth through oneself. By deepening the rationalism of Aristotle, he brought to light the new intellectual conditions that Maimonides, among the Jews, and Thomas Aquinas, among the Catholics, took advantage of to develop new theological systems. All medieval thought was marked by the following duality: revelation versus rationality (hermeneutical and philosophical), or in other words by a desire to harmonise the given revealed according to the necessary constraints of reason. Can the theory of truth in Averroes contribute to better, flexible, and peaceful integration of Muslims in plural societies? This text proposes to examine theory of truth of Averroes presented in 'Fasl al-Maq\u00e2l' ('The Decisive Treaty') and 'Tah\u00e2fut al tahafut' ('The Incoherence of Inconsistency'), and then to examine the conditions of the abandonment of this theory in the post-Averroes Islamic episteme that retained only the truth of revelation. Finally, this text will show that Averroes's conception of truth is fundamentally a philosophy of recognition driven by three universal principles: (1) understanding the others in their own system of reference, (2) understanding freedom as a responsibility in the search for truth, (3) recognising the right to be different through respect for others. (edited)","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5570,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Science et Esprit, Revue de philosophie et de th\u00e9ologie","volume":"73","issue":" 1-2","pages":"177-196"}},"sort":["La v\u00e9rit\u00e9 dans l'\u00e9pist\u00e9m\u00e8 islamique post-averroecien. La th\u00e9orie de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9 chez Averro\u00e8s pourra-t-elle contribuer au dialogue interculturel contemporain?"]}
| Title | Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del "faṣl al-maqāl" de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Estudios de Asia y Africa |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | Nr. 1 (153) |
| Pages | 99-133 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relación entre filosofía y religión. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Faṣl al-maqāl. En este artículo propondré una ruta de interpretación ligeramente distinta de la que otros intérpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendré que puede ser leído como un tratado de argumentación donde Averroes se ocupa no únicamente de mostrar la armonía entre la ley religiosa y la filosofía, sino también de esbozar una teoría de la argumentación sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epistémico de las creencias religiosas. A controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Faṣl al-maqāl. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24368078 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5583","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5583,"authors_free":[{"id":6481,"entry_id":5583,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavie","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes"},"abstract":"Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relaci\u00f3n entre filosof\u00eda y religi\u00f3n. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. En este art\u00edculo propondr\u00e9 una ruta de interpretaci\u00f3n ligeramente distinta de la que otros int\u00e9rpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendr\u00e9 que puede ser le\u00eddo como un tratado de argumentaci\u00f3n donde Averroes se ocupa no \u00fanicamente de mostrar la armon\u00eda entre la ley religiosa y la filosof\u00eda, sino tambi\u00e9n de esbozar una teor\u00eda de la argumentaci\u00f3n sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epist\u00e9mico de las creencias religiosas. \r\n\r\nA controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"Spanish","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24368078","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5583,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Estudios de Asia y Africa","volume":"49","issue":"Nr. 1 (153)","pages":"99-133"}},"sort":["Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes"]}
| Title | Received Wisdom: The Use of Authority in Medieval Islamic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement |
| Volume | 89 |
| Pages | 99-115 |
| Categories | Law, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Peter Adamson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this paper I challenge the notion that medieval philosophy was characterized by strict adherence to authority. In particular, I argue that to the contrary, self-consciously critical reflection on authority was a widespread intellectual virtue in the Islamic world. The contrary vice, called ‘taqlīd’, was considered appropriate only for those outside the scholarly elite. I further suggest that this idea was originally developed in the context of Islamic law and was then passed on to authors who worked within the philosophical tradition. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5811","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5811,"authors_free":[{"id":6732,"entry_id":5811,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter ","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}}],"entry_title":"Received Wisdom: The Use of Authority in Medieval Islamic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Received Wisdom: The Use of Authority in Medieval Islamic Philosophy"},"abstract":"In this paper I challenge the notion that medieval philosophy was characterized by strict adherence to authority. In particular, I argue that to the contrary, self-consciously critical reflection on authority was a widespread intellectual virtue in the Islamic world. The contrary vice, called \u2018taql\u012bd\u2019, was considered appropriate only for those outside the scholarly elite. I further suggest that this idea was originally developed in the context of Islamic law and was then passed on to authors who worked within the philosophical tradition.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1358246121000011","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5811,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement","volume":"89","issue":"","pages":"99-115"}},"sort":["Received Wisdom: The Use of Authority in Medieval Islamic Philosophy"]}
| Title | خطاب ابن رشد بين حق المعرفة وضغوط الخطاب النقيض / The Discourse of Ibn Rushd Between Knowledge and Constraint |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 6-35 |
| Categories | Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Nasr Hamid Abu-Zeid |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/521841 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2307/521841 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5731","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5731,"authors_free":[{"id":6639,"entry_id":5731,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nasr Hamid Abu-Zeid","free_first_name":"Nasr Hamid","free_last_name":" Abu-Zeid","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0628\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0631\u0641\u0629 \u0648\u0636\u063a\u0648\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0642\u064a\u0636 \/ The Discourse of Ibn Rushd Between Knowledge and Constraint","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0628\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0631\u0641\u0629 \u0648\u0636\u063a\u0648\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0642\u064a\u0636 \/ The Discourse of Ibn Rushd Between Knowledge and Constraint"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"Arabic","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/521841","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/521841","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5731,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics","volume":"16","issue":"","pages":"6-35"}},"sort":["\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0628\u064a\u0646 \u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0631\u0641\u0629 \u0648\u0636\u063a\u0648\u0637 \u0627\u0644\u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0642\u064a\u0636 \/ The Discourse of Ibn Rushd Between Knowledge and Constraint"]}
| Title | アヴェロエス研究 - 二重真理説 |
| Translation | Averroes Research - The Double-Truth-Theory |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Japanese |
| Date | 1982 |
| Journal | Kinki Daigaku Kyōyōbu Kenkyū Kiyō |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 157-172 |
| Categories | Law, Epistemology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Chisato Tanaka |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5533","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5533,"authors_free":[{"id":6426,"entry_id":5533,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1837,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chisato Tanaka","free_first_name":"Chisato","free_last_name":"Tanaka","norm_person":{"id":1837,"first_name":"Chisato","last_name":"Tanaka","full_name":"Chisato Tanaka","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Chisato Tanaka"}}],"entry_title":"\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Averroes Research - The Double-Truth-Theory","main_title":{"title":"\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1982","language":"Japanese","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1837,"full_name":"Chisato Tanaka","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5533,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Kinki Daigaku Ky\u014dy\u014dbu Kenky\u016b Kiy\u014d","volume":"13 ","issue":"3","pages":"157-172"}},"sort":["\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac"]}