{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5599","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5599,"authors_free":[{"id":6500,"entry_id":5599,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1855,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","free_first_name":"Jean-Patrick","free_last_name":"Guillaume","norm_person":{"id":1855,"first_name":"Jean-Patrick ","last_name":" Guillaume","full_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1117499030","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Patrick Guillaume"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s grammairien","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s grammairien"},"abstract":"The short treatise on Arabic grammar by Averroes (Ibn Ru\u0161d) entitled Al-\u1e0car\u016br\u012b f\u012b \u1e63in\u0101\u02c1at al-na\u1e25w (\u201cThe Indispensable in the Art of Grammar\u201d) is of considerable interest for the history of linguistic ideas. Although Averroes does not challenge the basic postulates and aims of traditional grammar, he adopts a more universalistic stance, and shows himself strongly critical of the grammarians, whom he reproaches with following an insufficiently rigorous method. This leads him, however, to raise a fundamental issue, already pointed out by F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, the lack of a syntactic component in the traditional theory, and to put forth a quite original solution, reducing all possible constructions to two main types, predicative (tark\u012bb i\u1e2bb\u0101r) and determinative (tark\u012bb taqy\u012bd).","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4000\/hel.2737","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":1855,"full_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5599,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Histoire \u00c9pist\u00e9mologie Langage","volume":" 44","issue":"2","pages":" S. 127-142"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s grammairien"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5336","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5336,"authors_free":[{"id":6182,"entry_id":5336,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":950,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Deborah L. Black","free_first_name":"Deborah L.","free_last_name":"Black","norm_person":{"id":950,"first_name":"Deborah Louise","last_name":"Black","full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1061153703","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/12971847","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Deborah Louise Black"}}],"entry_title":"Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy"},"abstract":"It has long been a truism of the history of philosophy that intentionality is an invention of the medieval period, and within this standard narrative, the central place of Arabic philosophy has always been acknowledged. Yet there are many misconceptions surrounding the theories of intentionality advanced by the two main Arabic thinkers whose works were available to the West, Avicenna and Averroes. In the first part of this paper I offer an overview of the general accounts of intentionality and intentional being found in the linguistic, psychological, and metaphysical writings of Avicenna and Averroes, and I trace the terminology of \u201cintentions\u201d to a neglected passage from Avicenna\u2019s logic. In the second part of the paper I examine the way that Avicenna and Averroes apply their general theories of intentionality to the realm of sense perception. I offer an explanation of why Avicenna might have chosen to denominate the objects of the internal sense faculty of estimation as \u201cintentions\u201d, and I explore the implications of Averroes\u2019s decision to attribute intentionality to the external senses and the media of perception.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/J.QUAESTIO.1.102326","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"}],"authors":[{"id":950,"full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5336,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Quaestio","volume":" 10","issue":"","pages":"65-81"}},"sort":["Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy"]}