Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays, 2019
By: Peter Adamson (Ed.), Matteo Di Giovanni (Ed.)
Title Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays
Type Monograph
Language English
Date 2019
Publication Place Cambridge
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Categories Logic, Natural Philosophy, Psychology, Metaphysics, Law, Medicine, Ethics
Author(s) Peter Adamson , Matteo Di Giovanni
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"4977","_score":null,"_source":{"id":4977,"authors_free":[{"id":5710,"entry_id":4977,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}},{"id":5711,"entry_id":4977,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":734,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Matteo Di Giovanni","free_first_name":"Matteo","free_last_name":"Di Giovanni","norm_person":{"id":734,"first_name":"Matteo","last_name":"Di Giovanni","full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1130687570","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/9497149368819485980007","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Matteo di Giovanni"}}],"entry_title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":2},{"id":734,"full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":4977,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2019]}

Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy, 2018
By: Richard C. Taylor
Title Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy
Type Article
Language English
Date 2018
Journal Studia graeco-arabica
Volume 8
Pages 287–304
Categories Metaphysics, Commentary, Natural Philosophy
Author(s) Richard C. Taylor
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Prophecy is conspicuous by its complete absence from all three of the commentaries on De Anima by Averroes. However, prophecy and philosophical metaphysics are discussed by him in his Commentary on the Parva Naturalia, a work written before his methodological work on philosophy and religion, the Faṣl al-maqāl, generally held to have been written ca. 1179-1180. The analyses and remarks of Averroes presented in that Commentary have been characterized by Herbert Davidson as “extremely radical” to the extent that “The term prophet would, on this reading, mean nothing more than the human author of Scripture; and the term revelation would mean a high level of philosophical knowledge”. In the present article I discuss Averroes on method in matters of religion and philosophy as well as prophecy in philosophically argumentative works and in dialectical works, with particular consideration of the reasoning of his Commentary on the Parva Naturalia. I conclude that Averroes found in philosophy and its sciences the most complete and precise truth content and highest levels of knowledge and understanding and from them constructed his worldview, while he found prophecy and religion to be like an Aristotelian practical science in that they concern good and right conduct in the achievement of an end attained in action, not truths to be known for their own sake.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5167","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5167,"authors_free":[{"id":5951,"entry_id":5167,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy"},"abstract":"Prophecy is conspicuous by its complete absence from all three of the commentaries on De Anima by Averroes. However, prophecy and philosophical metaphysics are discussed by him in his Commentary on the Parva Naturalia, a work written before his methodological work on philosophy and religion, the Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l, generally held to have been written ca. 1179-1180. The analyses and remarks of Averroes presented in that Commentary have been characterized by Herbert Davidson as \u201cextremely radical\u201d to the extent that \u201cThe term prophet would, on this reading, mean nothing more than the human author of Scripture; and the term revelation would mean a high level of philosophical knowledge\u201d. In the present article I discuss Averroes on method in matters of religion and philosophy as well as prophecy in philosophically argumentative works and in dialectical works, with particular consideration of the reasoning of his Commentary on the Parva Naturalia. I conclude that Averroes found in philosophy and its sciences the most complete and precise truth content and highest levels of knowledge and understanding and from them constructed his worldview, while he found prophecy and religion to be like an Aristotelian practical science in that they concern good and right conduct in the achievement of an end attained in action, not truths to be known for their own sake.","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5167,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"8","issue":"","pages":"287\u2013304"}},"sort":[2018]}

Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazalī, 2010
By: Mehmet Fatih Birgül
Title Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazalī
Type Article
Language English
Date 2010
Journal Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies
Volume 1
Issue 2
Pages 241–258
Categories Natural Philosophy, al-Ġazālī, Metaphysics
Author(s) Mehmet Fatih Birgül
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghazālī. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghazālī's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1636","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1636,"authors_free":[{"id":1892,"entry_id":1636,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1425,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","free_first_name":"Mehmet","free_last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","norm_person":{"id":1425,"first_name":"Mehmet","last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/101480661","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl"}}],"entry_title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b"},"abstract":"In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12730\/13091719.2010.12 (refers to the whole issue of the magazine)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1425,"full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1636,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"1","issue":"2","pages":"241\u2013258"}},"sort":[2010]}

رسائل ابن رشد و هي لالعلامة ابي الوليد [...] ابن رشد مشتملة على ست رسائل. ١. السماع الطبيعي. ٢. السماع و العالم. ٣. الكون و الفساد. ٤. الاثار العلوية. ٥. كتاب النفس. ٦. ما بعد الطبيعة, 1947
By: Averroes
Title رسائل ابن رشد و هي لالعلامة ابي الوليد [...] ابن رشد مشتملة على ست رسائل. ١. السماع الطبيعي. ٢. السماع و العالم. ٣. الكون و الفساد. ٤. الاثار العلوية. ٥. كتاب النفس. ٦. ما بعد الطبيعة
Transcription Rasāʾil Ibn Rušd wa-hiya li-l-ʿalāma ʾAbī l-Walīd [...] Ibn Rušd muštamila ʿalā sitt rasāʾil
Type Monograph
Language undefined
Date 1947
Publication Place Ḥaidarābād
Publisher Dāʾirat al-maʾārif al-ʿUṯmānīya
Categories Natural Philosophy, Cosmology, De anima, Metaphysics
Author(s) Averroes
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1897","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1897,"authors_free":[{"id":2295,"entry_id":1897,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}}],"entry_title":"\u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0648 \u0647\u064a \u0644\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0628\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f [...] \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0645\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0633\u062a \u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644. \u0661. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a. \u0662. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644\u0645. \u0663. \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0633\u0627\u062f. \u0664. \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0648\u064a\u0629. \u0665. \u0643\u062a\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0641\u0633. \u0666. \u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u0629","title_transcript":"Ras\u0101\u02beil Ibn Ru\u0161d wa-hiya li-l-\u02bfal\u0101ma \u02beAb\u012b l-Wal\u012bd [...] Ibn Ru\u0161d mu\u0161tamila \u02bfal\u0101 sitt ras\u0101\u02beil","title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0648 \u0647\u064a \u0644\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0628\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f [...] \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0645\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0633\u062a \u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644. \u0661. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a. \u0662. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644\u0645. \u0663. \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0633\u0627\u062f. \u0664. \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0648\u064a\u0629. \u0665. \u0643\u062a\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0641\u0633. \u0666. \u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u0629"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1947","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[{"id":66,"aw_title":"Short Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1897,"pubplace":"\u1e24aidar\u0101b\u0101d","publisher":"D\u0101\u02beirat al-ma\u02be\u0101rif al-\u02bfU\u1e6fm\u0101n\u012bya","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1947]}

Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy, 2018
By: Richard C. Taylor
Title Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy
Type Article
Language English
Date 2018
Journal Studia graeco-arabica
Volume 8
Pages 287–304
Categories Metaphysics, Commentary, Natural Philosophy
Author(s) Richard C. Taylor
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Prophecy is conspicuous by its complete absence from all three of the commentaries on De Anima by Averroes. However, prophecy and philosophical metaphysics are discussed by him in his Commentary on the Parva Naturalia, a work written before his methodological work on philosophy and religion, the Faṣl al-maqāl, generally held to have been written ca. 1179-1180. The analyses and remarks of Averroes presented in that Commentary have been characterized by Herbert Davidson as “extremely radical” to the extent that “The term prophet would, on this reading, mean nothing more than the human author of Scripture; and the term revelation would mean a high level of philosophical knowledge”. In the present article I discuss Averroes on method in matters of religion and philosophy as well as prophecy in philosophically argumentative works and in dialectical works, with particular consideration of the reasoning of his Commentary on the Parva Naturalia. I conclude that Averroes found in philosophy and its sciences the most complete and precise truth content and highest levels of knowledge and understanding and from them constructed his worldview, while he found prophecy and religion to be like an Aristotelian practical science in that they concern good and right conduct in the achievement of an end attained in action, not truths to be known for their own sake.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5167","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5167,"authors_free":[{"id":5951,"entry_id":5167,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy"},"abstract":"Prophecy is conspicuous by its complete absence from all three of the commentaries on De Anima by Averroes. However, prophecy and philosophical metaphysics are discussed by him in his Commentary on the Parva Naturalia, a work written before his methodological work on philosophy and religion, the Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l, generally held to have been written ca. 1179-1180. The analyses and remarks of Averroes presented in that Commentary have been characterized by Herbert Davidson as \u201cextremely radical\u201d to the extent that \u201cThe term prophet would, on this reading, mean nothing more than the human author of Scripture; and the term revelation would mean a high level of philosophical knowledge\u201d. In the present article I discuss Averroes on method in matters of religion and philosophy as well as prophecy in philosophically argumentative works and in dialectical works, with particular consideration of the reasoning of his Commentary on the Parva Naturalia. I conclude that Averroes found in philosophy and its sciences the most complete and precise truth content and highest levels of knowledge and understanding and from them constructed his worldview, while he found prophecy and religion to be like an Aristotelian practical science in that they concern good and right conduct in the achievement of an end attained in action, not truths to be known for their own sake.","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5167,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"8","issue":"","pages":"287\u2013304"}},"sort":["Averroes and the Philosophical Account of Prophecy"]}

Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazalī, 2010
By: Mehmet Fatih Birgül
Title Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazalī
Type Article
Language English
Date 2010
Journal Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies
Volume 1
Issue 2
Pages 241–258
Categories Natural Philosophy, al-Ġazālī, Metaphysics
Author(s) Mehmet Fatih Birgül
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghazālī. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghazālī's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1636","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1636,"authors_free":[{"id":1892,"entry_id":1636,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1425,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","free_first_name":"Mehmet","free_last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","norm_person":{"id":1425,"first_name":"Mehmet","last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/101480661","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl"}}],"entry_title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b"},"abstract":"In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12730\/13091719.2010.12 (refers to the whole issue of the magazine)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1425,"full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1636,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"1","issue":"2","pages":"241\u2013258"}},"sort":["Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b"]}

Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays, 2019
By: Peter Adamson (Ed.), Matteo Di Giovanni (Ed.)
Title Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays
Type Monograph
Language English
Date 2019
Publication Place Cambridge
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Categories Logic, Natural Philosophy, Psychology, Metaphysics, Law, Medicine, Ethics
Author(s) Peter Adamson , Matteo Di Giovanni
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"4977","_score":null,"_source":{"id":4977,"authors_free":[{"id":5710,"entry_id":4977,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}},{"id":5711,"entry_id":4977,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":734,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Matteo Di Giovanni","free_first_name":"Matteo","free_last_name":"Di Giovanni","norm_person":{"id":734,"first_name":"Matteo","last_name":"Di Giovanni","full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1130687570","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/9497149368819485980007","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Matteo di Giovanni"}}],"entry_title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":2},{"id":734,"full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":4977,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays"]}

رسائل ابن رشد و هي لالعلامة ابي الوليد [...] ابن رشد مشتملة على ست رسائل. ١. السماع الطبيعي. ٢. السماع و العالم. ٣. الكون و الفساد. ٤. الاثار العلوية. ٥. كتاب النفس. ٦. ما بعد الطبيعة, 1947
By: Averroes
Title رسائل ابن رشد و هي لالعلامة ابي الوليد [...] ابن رشد مشتملة على ست رسائل. ١. السماع الطبيعي. ٢. السماع و العالم. ٣. الكون و الفساد. ٤. الاثار العلوية. ٥. كتاب النفس. ٦. ما بعد الطبيعة
Transcription Rasāʾil Ibn Rušd wa-hiya li-l-ʿalāma ʾAbī l-Walīd [...] Ibn Rušd muštamila ʿalā sitt rasāʾil
Type Monograph
Language undefined
Date 1947
Publication Place Ḥaidarābād
Publisher Dāʾirat al-maʾārif al-ʿUṯmānīya
Categories Natural Philosophy, Cosmology, De anima, Metaphysics
Author(s) Averroes
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1897","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1897,"authors_free":[{"id":2295,"entry_id":1897,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}}],"entry_title":"\u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0648 \u0647\u064a \u0644\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0628\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f [...] \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0645\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0633\u062a \u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644. \u0661. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a. \u0662. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644\u0645. \u0663. \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0633\u0627\u062f. \u0664. \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0648\u064a\u0629. \u0665. \u0643\u062a\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0641\u0633. \u0666. \u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u0629","title_transcript":"Ras\u0101\u02beil Ibn Ru\u0161d wa-hiya li-l-\u02bfal\u0101ma \u02beAb\u012b l-Wal\u012bd [...] Ibn Ru\u0161d mu\u0161tamila \u02bfal\u0101 sitt ras\u0101\u02beil","title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0648 \u0647\u064a \u0644\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0628\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f [...] \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0645\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0633\u062a \u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644. \u0661. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a. \u0662. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644\u0645. \u0663. \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0633\u0627\u062f. \u0664. \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0648\u064a\u0629. \u0665. \u0643\u062a\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0641\u0633. \u0666. \u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u0629"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1947","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[{"id":66,"aw_title":"Short Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1897,"pubplace":"\u1e24aidar\u0101b\u0101d","publisher":"D\u0101\u02beirat al-ma\u02be\u0101rif al-\u02bfU\u1e6fm\u0101n\u012bya","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["\u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0648 \u0647\u064a \u0644\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0627\u0645\u0629 \u0627\u0628\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0644\u064a\u062f [...] \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0645\u0634\u062a\u0645\u0644\u0629 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0633\u062a \u0631\u0633\u0627\u0626\u0644. \u0661. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a. \u0662. \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0639 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0627\u0644\u0645. \u0663. \u0627\u0644\u0643\u0648\u0646 \u0648 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0633\u0627\u062f. \u0664. \u0627\u0644\u0627\u062b\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0648\u064a\u0629. \u0665. \u0643\u062a\u0627\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0641\u0633. \u0666. \u0645\u0627 \u0628\u0639\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u0629"]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 1