{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5078","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5078,"authors_free":[{"id":5839,"entry_id":5078,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jaan S. Islam","free_first_name":"Jaan S. ","free_last_name":"Islam","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"},"abstract":"This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the \u201cvirtuous society\u201d and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Shar\u012b\u2018a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between \u201creligious\u201d and \u201cpolitical\u201d (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5078,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"4","issue":"1","pages":"43\u201365"}},"sort":[2019]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"746","_score":null,"_source":{"id":746,"authors_free":[{"id":905,"entry_id":746,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":933,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Jainzik","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Jainzik","norm_person":{"id":933,"first_name":"Michael","last_name":"Jainzik","full_name":"Michael Jainzik","short_ident":"MicJai","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Michael Jainzik"}}],"entry_title":"Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":933,"full_name":"Michael Jainzik","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":746,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Concilium medii aevi. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Geschichte, Kunst und Kultur des Mittelalters und der Fr\u00fchen Neuzeit","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"143\u2013186"}},"sort":[2002]}