Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God, 2013
By: Mehmet Ata Az
Title Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God
Type Article
Language English
Date 2013
Journal Ilahiyat Studies
Volume 4
Issue 2
Pages 149-181
Categories Thomas, Theology
Author(s) Mehmet Ata Az
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2020","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2020,"authors_free":[{"id":2460,"entry_id":2020,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1606,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","free_first_name":"Mehmet Ata","free_last_name":"Az","norm_person":{"id":1606,"first_name":"Mehmet Ata","last_name":"Az","full_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","short_ident":"MehAz","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mehmet Ata Az"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1606,"full_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2020,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies","volume":"4","issue":"2","pages":"149-181"}},"sort":[2013]}

The Will in Averroes and Aquinas, 2013
By: Traci Phillipson
Title The Will in Averroes and Aquinas
Type Article
Language English
Date 2013
Journal Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Volume 87
Pages 231-247
Categories Thomas, Aristotle, De anima
Author(s) Traci Phillipson
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Despite the drastic differences in their views of the intellect and the location and specific function of the will both Aquinas and Averroes are able to claim that their systems allow for moral agency because they both place the will—a faculty that is of prime importance to the process of moral action—in the individual. Both philosophers think that they are following Aristotle in making their claims about the will and the intellects. This paper will examine the issue of will and the related issue of the intellects as it appears in the Aristotelian texts and in the subsequent work of Averroes and Aquinas. It will argue that at least some of the divergence in Averroes and Aquinas can be attributed to an issue of translation regarding De Anima, and a difference in the role of cogitation and the intellects regarding will.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2041","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2041,"authors_free":[{"id":2482,"entry_id":2041,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1618,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Traci Phillipson","free_first_name":"Traci","free_last_name":"Phillipson","norm_person":{"id":1618,"first_name":"Traci","last_name":"Phillipson","full_name":"Traci Phillipson","short_ident":"TraPhi","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Traci Phillipson"}}],"entry_title":"The Will in Averroes and Aquinas","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Will in Averroes and Aquinas"},"abstract":"Despite the drastic differences in their views of the intellect and the location and specific function of the will both Aquinas and Averroes are able to claim that their systems allow for moral agency because they both place the will\u2014a faculty that is of prime importance to the process of moral action\u2014in the individual. Both philosophers think that they are following Aristotle in making their claims about the will and the intellects. This paper will examine the issue of will and the related issue of the intellects as it appears in the Aristotelian texts and in the subsequent work of Averroes and Aquinas. It will argue that at least some of the divergence in Averroes and Aquinas can be attributed to an issue of translation regarding De Anima, and a difference in the role of cogitation and the intellects regarding will.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":1618,"full_name":"Traci Phillipson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2041,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"87","issue":null,"pages":"231-247"}},"sort":[2013]}

Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2, 2012
By: Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Title Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales
Volume 79
Issue 2
Pages 307–337
Categories Thomas, Avicenna
Author(s) Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Avicenna's philosophy had a strong impact on many aspects of Thomas Aquinas' thought: Aquinas' early doctrine of creation is no exception to this. The present paper shows how the young Aquinas appeals to Avicenna's metaphysics while formulating a novel view on the topic of the creation of the world, a view diverging significantly from those of such contemporaries as Bonaventure and Albert the Great. After a brief historical introduction to the various argumentative strategies concerning the creation of the world, the discussion turns to an analysis of Aquinas' treatment in In II Sent. d. 1, q. 1, a. 2.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1879","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1879,"authors_free":[{"id":2251,"entry_id":1879,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2"},"abstract":"Avicenna's philosophy had a strong impact on many aspects of Thomas Aquinas' thought: Aquinas' early doctrine of creation is no exception to this. The present paper shows how the young Aquinas appeals to Avicenna's metaphysics while formulating a novel view on the topic of the creation of the world, a view diverging significantly from those of such contemporaries as Bonaventure and Albert the Great. After a brief historical introduction to the various argumentative strategies concerning the creation of the world, the discussion turns to an analysis of Aquinas' treatment in In II Sent. d. 1, q. 1, a. 2.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1879,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de Th\u00e9ologie et Philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"79","issue":"2","pages":"307\u2013337"}},"sort":[2012]}

Arabic/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1, 2012
By: Richard C. Taylor
Title Arabic/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal The Thomist. A Speculative Quarterly Review of Theology and Philosophy
Volume 76
Issue 4
Pages 509–550
Categories Thomas
Author(s) Richard C. Taylor
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2005","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2005,"authors_free":[{"id":2446,"entry_id":2005,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2005,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Thomist. A Speculative Quarterly Review of Theology and Philosophy","volume":"76","issue":"4","pages":"509\u2013550"}},"sort":[2012]}

S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme, 2011
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme
Type Article
Language French
Date 2011
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 21
Issue 2
Pages 215–247
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1535","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1535,"authors_free":[{"id":1762,"entry_id":1535,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"},"abstract":"The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1535,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"215\u2013247"}},"sort":[2011]}

Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averroès à Phys. I, 1, 2009
By: Cristina Cerami
Title Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averroès à Phys. I, 1
Type Article
Language French
Date 2009
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 19
Issue 2
Pages 189–223
Categories Thomas, Commentary, Physics, Tradition and Reception
Author(s) Cristina Cerami
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1382","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1382,"authors_free":[{"id":1574,"entry_id":1382,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1"},"abstract":"The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1382,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"189\u2013223"}},"sort":[2009]}

Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality, 2009
By: Gabriele Galluzzo
Title Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality
Type Article
Language English
Date 2009
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 19
Issue 2
Pages 157–187
Categories Metaphysics, Thomas
Author(s) Gabriele Galluzzo
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The paper analyses Averroes's and Aquinas's different reconstructions of Aristotle's ontology in the central books of the Metaphysics. The main claim the paper argues for is that Averroes endorses an explanatory criterion of substantiality, while Aquinas favours an independent existence criterion. The result of these different choices is that the Arabic commentator believes that the forms of sensible objects are more substances than the objects of which they are the forms, while the Dominican Master sticks to the traditional picture that sensible objects hold some kind of priority over their ontological constituents in general and over form in particular. For Averroes, therefore, the central books of the Metaphysics mark a major departure from the Categories ontology, where particular sensible objects are regarded as fundamental entities and so primary substances. On Aquinas's reconstruction, by contrast, sensible objects are still thought of in the Metaphysics as primary substances in spite of their being analysable into matter and form.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1386,"authors_free":[{"id":1578,"entry_id":1386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1288,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","free_first_name":"Gabriele","free_last_name":"Galluzzo","norm_person":{"id":1288,"first_name":"Gabriele","last_name":"Galluzzo","full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1027244637","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61842398","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gabriele Galluzzo"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality"},"abstract":"The paper analyses Averroes's and Aquinas's different reconstructions of Aristotle's ontology in the central books of the Metaphysics. The main claim the paper argues for is that Averroes endorses an explanatory criterion of substantiality, while Aquinas favours an independent existence criterion. The result of these different choices is that the Arabic commentator believes that the forms of sensible objects are more substances than the objects of which they are the forms, while the Dominican Master sticks to the traditional picture that sensible objects hold some kind of priority over their ontological constituents in general and over form in particular. For Averroes, therefore, the central books of the Metaphysics mark a major departure from the Categories ontology, where particular sensible objects are regarded as fundamental entities and so primary substances. On Aquinas's reconstruction, by contrast, sensible objects are still thought of in the Metaphysics as primary substances in spite of their being analysable into matter and form.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1288,"full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"157\u2013187"}},"sort":[2009]}

Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology, 2009
By: Brian Copenhaver
Title Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology
Type Article
Language English
Date 2009
Journal Vivarium
Volume 47
Pages 444–479
Categories Thomas, Theology
Author(s) Brian Copenhaver
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1422","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1422,"authors_free":[{"id":1617,"entry_id":1422,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1316,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Brian Copenhaver","free_first_name":"Brian","free_last_name":"Copenhaver","norm_person":{"id":1316,"first_name":"Brian","last_name":"Copenhaver","full_name":"Brian Copenhaver","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139251499","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/93876023","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Brian Copenhaver"}}],"entry_title":"Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1316,"full_name":"Brian Copenhaver","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1422,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vivarium","volume":"47","issue":null,"pages":"444\u2013479"}},"sort":[2009]}

Averroes y Tomás de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural, 2007
By: Celina A. Lértora Mendoza
Title Averroes y Tomás de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2007
Journal VeritasA Filosofia árabe e judaica e o ocidente medieval
Volume 52
Issue 3
Pages 149–158
Categories Thomas, Physics
Author(s) Celina A. Lértora Mendoza
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1466","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1466,"authors_free":[{"id":1675,"entry_id":1466,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":889,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Celina A. L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","free_first_name":"Celina A.","free_last_name":"L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","norm_person":{"id":889,"first_name":"Celina A.","last_name":"L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","full_name":"Celina A. L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1055934863","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24622581","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Celina A. L\u00e9rtora Mendoza"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[{"id":889,"full_name":"Celina A. L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1466,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"VeritasA Filosofia \u00e1rabe e judaica e o ocidente medieval","volume":"52","issue":"3","pages":"149\u2013158"}},"sort":[2007]}

"... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé , 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title "... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph
Volume 59
Pages 69–96
Categories Psychology, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1488","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1488,"authors_free":[{"id":1710,"entry_id":1488,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1488,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"59","issue":null,"pages":"69\u201396"}},"sort":[2006]}

"... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé , 2006
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title "... set hominem anima". Thomas d'Aquin et la pensée humaine comme acte du composé
Type Article
Language French
Date 2006
Journal Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph
Volume 59
Pages 69–96
Categories Psychology, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1488","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1488,"authors_free":[{"id":1710,"entry_id":1488,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1488,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"59","issue":null,"pages":"69\u201396"}},"sort":["\"... set hominem anima\". Thomas d'Aquin et la pens\u00e9e humaine comme acte du compos\u00e9 "]}

Arabic/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1, 2012
By: Richard C. Taylor
Title Arabic/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal The Thomist. A Speculative Quarterly Review of Theology and Philosophy
Volume 76
Issue 4
Pages 509–550
Categories Thomas
Author(s) Richard C. Taylor
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2005","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2005,"authors_free":[{"id":2446,"entry_id":2005,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2005,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Thomist. A Speculative Quarterly Review of Theology and Philosophy","volume":"76","issue":"4","pages":"509\u2013550"}},"sort":["Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas's Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A. 1"]}

Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality, 2009
By: Gabriele Galluzzo
Title Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality
Type Article
Language English
Date 2009
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 19
Issue 2
Pages 157–187
Categories Metaphysics, Thomas
Author(s) Gabriele Galluzzo
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The paper analyses Averroes's and Aquinas's different reconstructions of Aristotle's ontology in the central books of the Metaphysics. The main claim the paper argues for is that Averroes endorses an explanatory criterion of substantiality, while Aquinas favours an independent existence criterion. The result of these different choices is that the Arabic commentator believes that the forms of sensible objects are more substances than the objects of which they are the forms, while the Dominican Master sticks to the traditional picture that sensible objects hold some kind of priority over their ontological constituents in general and over form in particular. For Averroes, therefore, the central books of the Metaphysics mark a major departure from the Categories ontology, where particular sensible objects are regarded as fundamental entities and so primary substances. On Aquinas's reconstruction, by contrast, sensible objects are still thought of in the Metaphysics as primary substances in spite of their being analysable into matter and form.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1386,"authors_free":[{"id":1578,"entry_id":1386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1288,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","free_first_name":"Gabriele","free_last_name":"Galluzzo","norm_person":{"id":1288,"first_name":"Gabriele","last_name":"Galluzzo","full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1027244637","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61842398","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gabriele Galluzzo"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality"},"abstract":"The paper analyses Averroes's and Aquinas's different reconstructions of Aristotle's ontology in the central books of the Metaphysics. The main claim the paper argues for is that Averroes endorses an explanatory criterion of substantiality, while Aquinas favours an independent existence criterion. The result of these different choices is that the Arabic commentator believes that the forms of sensible objects are more substances than the objects of which they are the forms, while the Dominican Master sticks to the traditional picture that sensible objects hold some kind of priority over their ontological constituents in general and over form in particular. For Averroes, therefore, the central books of the Metaphysics mark a major departure from the Categories ontology, where particular sensible objects are regarded as fundamental entities and so primary substances. On Aquinas's reconstruction, by contrast, sensible objects are still thought of in the Metaphysics as primary substances in spite of their being analysable into matter and form.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1288,"full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"157\u2013187"}},"sort":["Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality"]}

Averroes y Tomás de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural, 2007
By: Celina A. Lértora Mendoza
Title Averroes y Tomás de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural
Type Article
Language Spanish
Date 2007
Journal VeritasA Filosofia árabe e judaica e o ocidente medieval
Volume 52
Issue 3
Pages 149–158
Categories Thomas, Physics
Author(s) Celina A. Lértora Mendoza
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1466","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1466,"authors_free":[{"id":1675,"entry_id":1466,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":889,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Celina A. L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","free_first_name":"Celina A.","free_last_name":"L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","norm_person":{"id":889,"first_name":"Celina A.","last_name":"L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","full_name":"Celina A. L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1055934863","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24622581","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Celina A. L\u00e9rtora Mendoza"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[{"id":889,"full_name":"Celina A. L\u00e9rtora Mendoza","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1466,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"VeritasA Filosofia \u00e1rabe e judaica e o ocidente medieval","volume":"52","issue":"3","pages":"149\u2013158"}},"sort":["Averroes y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino sobre el concepto de ciencia natural"]}

Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God, 2013
By: Mehmet Ata Az
Title Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God
Type Article
Language English
Date 2013
Journal Ilahiyat Studies
Volume 4
Issue 2
Pages 149-181
Categories Thomas, Theology
Author(s) Mehmet Ata Az
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2020","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2020,"authors_free":[{"id":2460,"entry_id":2020,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1606,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","free_first_name":"Mehmet Ata","free_last_name":"Az","norm_person":{"id":1606,"first_name":"Mehmet Ata","last_name":"Az","full_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","short_ident":"MehAz","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mehmet Ata Az"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1606,"full_name":"Mehmet Ata Az","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2020,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies","volume":"4","issue":"2","pages":"149-181"}},"sort":["Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on the Possibility of Talking about God"]}

Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2, 2012
By: Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Title Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2
Type Article
Language English
Date 2012
Journal Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales
Volume 79
Issue 2
Pages 307–337
Categories Thomas, Avicenna
Author(s) Luis Xavier López-Farjeat
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Avicenna's philosophy had a strong impact on many aspects of Thomas Aquinas' thought: Aquinas' early doctrine of creation is no exception to this. The present paper shows how the young Aquinas appeals to Avicenna's metaphysics while formulating a novel view on the topic of the creation of the world, a view diverging significantly from those of such contemporaries as Bonaventure and Albert the Great. After a brief historical introduction to the various argumentative strategies concerning the creation of the world, the discussion turns to an analysis of Aquinas' treatment in In II Sent. d. 1, q. 1, a. 2.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1879","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1879,"authors_free":[{"id":2251,"entry_id":1879,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2"},"abstract":"Avicenna's philosophy had a strong impact on many aspects of Thomas Aquinas' thought: Aquinas' early doctrine of creation is no exception to this. The present paper shows how the young Aquinas appeals to Avicenna's metaphysics while formulating a novel view on the topic of the creation of the world, a view diverging significantly from those of such contemporaries as Bonaventure and Albert the Great. After a brief historical introduction to the various argumentative strategies concerning the creation of the world, the discussion turns to an analysis of Aquinas' treatment in In II Sent. d. 1, q. 1, a. 2.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1879,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de Th\u00e9ologie et Philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"79","issue":"2","pages":"307\u2013337"}},"sort":["Avicenna's Influence on Aquinas' Early Doctrine of Creation in In II Sent., d. 1, q. 1, a. 2"]}

Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averroès et Thomas d'Aquin, 2002
By: Alain de Libera
Title Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averroès et Thomas d'Aquin
Type Article
Language French
Date 2002
Journal Studi Medievali
Volume 43
Pages 833–856
Categories Thomas, Relation between Philosophy and Theology
Author(s) Alain de Libera
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1548","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1548,"authors_free":[{"id":1777,"entry_id":1548,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":647,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alain de Libera","free_first_name":"Alain de","free_last_name":"Libera","norm_person":{"id":647,"first_name":"Alain de","last_name":"Libera","full_name":"Alain de Libera","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130219002","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/98388541","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd130219002.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alain de Libera"}}],"entry_title":"Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":647,"full_name":"Alain de Libera","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1548,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studi Medievali","volume":"43","issue":null,"pages":"833\u2013856"}},"sort":["Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin"]}

S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme, 2011
By: Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Title S'unir à l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averroès Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au Cœur du Thomisme
Type Article
Language French
Date 2011
Journal Arabic Sciences and Philosophy
Volume 21
Issue 2
Pages 215–247
Categories Psychology, Commentary, Thomas
Author(s) Jean-Baptiste Brenet
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1535","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1535,"authors_free":[{"id":1762,"entry_id":1535,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"},"abstract":"The article examines the relation that Aquinas' theory of the beatific vision maintains with Averroes' noetics as presented in his Great Commentary on the De anima. Starting with his Commentary on the Sentences, in which the young Thomas Aquinas offers an explicit transposition of the philosophical intellection of separate substances into the Christian theological order, through to his later works where no mention of it is found, we will endeavour to present the exact nature of these borrowings and to evaluate their accuracy by questioning the conceptual coherence of Aquinas' gesture: could Aquinas base his conception of a vision of God by essence on a noetic construction which was originally part of a system judged both erroneous and contrary to faith? Can one concede theologically, concerning the relation between divine essence and intellect, what one refuses philosophically, concerning the relation between the separate intellect and the body? Although Aquinas and his followers, in the incipient quarrel, assert it to be so, we will indicate how the original paradoxical borrowing maintains something conceptually problematic at the heart of Aquinas' thinking.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1535,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"21","issue":"2","pages":"215\u2013247"}},"sort":["S'unir \u00e0 l'Intellect, Voir Dieu. Averro\u00e8s Et la Doctrine de la Jonction au C\u0153ur du Thomisme"]}

Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology, 2009
By: Brian Copenhaver
Title Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology
Type Article
Language English
Date 2009
Journal Vivarium
Volume 47
Pages 444–479
Categories Thomas, Theology
Author(s) Brian Copenhaver
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1422","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1422,"authors_free":[{"id":1617,"entry_id":1422,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1316,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Brian Copenhaver","free_first_name":"Brian","free_last_name":"Copenhaver","norm_person":{"id":1316,"first_name":"Brian","last_name":"Copenhaver","full_name":"Brian Copenhaver","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139251499","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/93876023","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Brian Copenhaver"}}],"entry_title":"Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1316,"full_name":"Brian Copenhaver","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1422,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vivarium","volume":"47","issue":null,"pages":"444\u2013479"}},"sort":["Ten Arguments in Search of a Philosopher. Averroes and Aquinas in Ficino's Platonic Theology"]}

The Will in Averroes and Aquinas, 2013
By: Traci Phillipson
Title The Will in Averroes and Aquinas
Type Article
Language English
Date 2013
Journal Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association
Volume 87
Pages 231-247
Categories Thomas, Aristotle, De anima
Author(s) Traci Phillipson
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Despite the drastic differences in their views of the intellect and the location and specific function of the will both Aquinas and Averroes are able to claim that their systems allow for moral agency because they both place the will—a faculty that is of prime importance to the process of moral action—in the individual. Both philosophers think that they are following Aristotle in making their claims about the will and the intellects. This paper will examine the issue of will and the related issue of the intellects as it appears in the Aristotelian texts and in the subsequent work of Averroes and Aquinas. It will argue that at least some of the divergence in Averroes and Aquinas can be attributed to an issue of translation regarding De Anima, and a difference in the role of cogitation and the intellects regarding will.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2041","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2041,"authors_free":[{"id":2482,"entry_id":2041,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1618,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Traci Phillipson","free_first_name":"Traci","free_last_name":"Phillipson","norm_person":{"id":1618,"first_name":"Traci","last_name":"Phillipson","full_name":"Traci Phillipson","short_ident":"TraPhi","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Traci Phillipson"}}],"entry_title":"The Will in Averroes and Aquinas","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Will in Averroes and Aquinas"},"abstract":"Despite the drastic differences in their views of the intellect and the location and specific function of the will both Aquinas and Averroes are able to claim that their systems allow for moral agency because they both place the will\u2014a faculty that is of prime importance to the process of moral action\u2014in the individual. Both philosophers think that they are following Aristotle in making their claims about the will and the intellects. This paper will examine the issue of will and the related issue of the intellects as it appears in the Aristotelian texts and in the subsequent work of Averroes and Aquinas. It will argue that at least some of the divergence in Averroes and Aquinas can be attributed to an issue of translation regarding De Anima, and a difference in the role of cogitation and the intellects regarding will.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":1618,"full_name":"Traci Phillipson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2041,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"87","issue":null,"pages":"231-247"}},"sort":["The Will in Averroes and Aquinas"]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 2