| Title | Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafsîr kitâb al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d’Aquino |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Dianoia |
| Volume | 24 |
| Pages | 15-32 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, De anima, Averroism, Siger of Brabant, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Federico Minzoni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| A widespread historiographic commonplace, established by Thomas Aquinas himself in his Tractatus de unitate intellectus (1270), takes Siger of Brabant’s Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1265) to be a latin formulation of Ibn Rušd’s theory of the unity of the material intellect as exposed in the Tafsīr Kitāb al-Nafs (Long Commentary on the De anima, ca. 1186); according to the same view, Aquinas’ philosophy of mind would be the expression of a strongly antiaverroistic – and therefore more orthodox – kind of aristotelianism. Building on a thorough analysis of key texts in Aquinas’ Commentary on the Sentences (1255), I argue in this paper that those who hold Aquinas’ noetic to be anti-averroistic are greatly mistaken: while Siger’s always superficial rushdian inspiration is better understood against the background of a neoplatonic-tinged mind-body dualism clearly at odds with Ibn Rušd’s own strictly peripatetic ontology, Aquinas’ psychology, hylomorfic and not-dualist at its core, is aristotelian mainly inasmuch as it is rushdian. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5154","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5154,"authors_free":[{"id":5935,"entry_id":5154,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1682,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Federico Minzoni","free_first_name":"Federico","free_last_name":"Minzoni","norm_person":{"id":1682,"first_name":"Federico","last_name":"Minzoni","full_name":"Federico Minzoni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Federico Minzoni"}}],"entry_title":"Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino"},"abstract":"A widespread historiographic commonplace, established by Thomas Aquinas himself in his Tractatus de unitate intellectus (1270), takes Siger of Brabant\u2019s Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1265) to be a latin formulation of Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s theory of the unity of the material intellect as exposed in the Tafs\u012br Kit\u0101b al-Nafs (Long Commentary on the De anima, ca. 1186); according to the same view, Aquinas\u2019 philosophy of mind would be the expression of a strongly antiaverroistic \u2013 and therefore more orthodox \u2013 kind of aristotelianism. Building on a thorough analysis of key texts in Aquinas\u2019 Commentary on the Sentences (1255), I argue in this paper that those who hold Aquinas\u2019 noetic to be anti-averroistic are greatly mistaken: while Siger\u2019s always superficial rushdian inspiration is better understood against the background of a neoplatonic-tinged mind-body dualism clearly at odds with Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s own strictly peripatetic ontology, Aquinas\u2019 psychology, hylomorfic and not-dualist at its core, is aristotelian mainly inasmuch as it is rushdian. ","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1682,"full_name":"Federico Minzoni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5154,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dianoia","volume":"24","issue":"","pages":"15-32"}},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes’ Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3 |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Published in | Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives |
| Pages | 127–134 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Physics, Averroism |
| Author(s) | Andrea Vella |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5106","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5106,"authors_free":[{"id":5881,"entry_id":5106,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1275,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andrea Vella","free_first_name":"Andrea","free_last_name":"Vella","norm_person":{"id":1275,"first_name":"Andrea","last_name":"Vella","full_name":"Andrea Vella","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/141393246","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andrea Vella"}}],"entry_title":"John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes\u2019 Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes\u2019 Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1275,"full_name":"Andrea Vella","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5106,"section_of":5105,"pages":"127\u2013134","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5105,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2017","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"The reason\/no-reason conceptual pair (also declinable in the similar forms of rational\/a-rational, logical\/a-logical) pervades the history of Western thought from the archaic era up to contemporary times. Perceived in different historical periods and in different cultural forms either as a conflict or as a vital coexistence, the reason\/no-reason pair was first theorized and legitimated as a sharp contrast in antiquity with the Pythagorean systoichiai, and at the dawn of the twentieth century it was successfully exemplified by Nietzsche through the opposition between Apollonian and Dionysian principles, which denotes respectively the harmonious, orderly, 'bright' side of the human soul, and the chaotic one, wild, instinctive, passionate, 'dark'. This volume is the outcome of the work of an international research group, which intended to cover some aspects of this dichotomy with the specific end to prove that the two sides of the human 'soul' don't contradict each other - in such a way that one excludes, ontologically and axiologically, the other - but they are rather closely interrelated and interdependent. Scholars with different expertise in the history of thought tackled diachronically some key moments of this story, from different angles and with different approaches, from ancient thought to modern neurosciences. The volume contains contributions of Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Institute of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University), R. Loredana Cardullo (University of Catania), Francesco Coniglione (University of Catania), Santo Di Nuovo (University of Catania), Daniele Iozzia (University of Catania), Syliane Malinowski-Charles (Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec \u00e0 Trois Rivi\u00e8re), Concetto Martello (University of Catania), Alexandra Michalewski (Paris - Sorbonne, CNRS), Chiara Militello (University of Catania), Sebastian Moro Tornese (United Kingdom), Jean-Marc Narbonne (Laval Universit\u00e9, Canada), Anne Sheppard (Royal Holloway, University of London), Salvatore Vasta (University of Catania), Andrea Vella (University of Catania).","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5105,"pubplace":"Sankt Augustin","publisher":"Academia Verlag","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe |
| Pages | 65–80 |
| Categories | Averroism, Aristotle, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Despite Renaissance humanists’ polemics against Averroes, interest in his writings grew during the sixteenth century. This interest was related to humanism. As Aristotelians became increasingly aware of the Greek commentators on Aristotle, many saw Averroes as an heir to the ancient tradition. Thus they believed that by reading his works they could gain access to a purer form of Aristotelianism. As a result, a number of scholars wrote commentaries on Averroes’s natural philosophical works, and the Commentator became a subject for both philosophical and philological commentary. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1743","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1743,"authors_free":[{"id":2010,"entry_id":1743,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance"},"abstract":"Despite Renaissance humanists\u2019 polemics against Averroes, interest in his writings grew during the sixteenth century. This interest was related to humanism. As Aristotelians became increasingly aware of the Greek commentators on Aristotle, many saw Averroes as an heir to the ancient tradition. Thus they believed that by reading his works they could gain access to a purer form of Aristotelianism. As a result, a number of scholars wrote commentaries on Averroes\u2019s natural philosophical works, and the Commentator became a subject for both philosophical and philological commentary.","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5240-5_4","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1743,"section_of":241,"pages":"65\u201380","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":241,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":241,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Springer","series":"International Archives of the History of Ideas","volume":"211","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Les commentaires sur la Physique d'Aristote attribués à Siger de Brabant |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1949 |
| Journal | Revue philosophique de Louvain |
| Volume | 47 |
| Pages | 334-350 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, Physics, Averroism, Latin Averroism, Siger of Brabant |
| Author(s) | Anneliese Maier |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26333245 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5635","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5635,"authors_free":[{"id":6540,"entry_id":5635,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1866,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anneliese Maier","free_first_name":"Anneliese ","free_last_name":"Maier","norm_person":{"id":1866,"first_name":"Anneliese ","last_name":"Maier","full_name":"Anneliese Maier","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118781286","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Anneliese Maier"}}],"entry_title":"Les commentaires sur la Physique d'Aristote attribu\u00e9s \u00e0 Siger de Brabant","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Les commentaires sur la Physique d'Aristote attribu\u00e9s \u00e0 Siger de Brabant"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1949","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26333245","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"}],"authors":[{"id":1866,"full_name":"Anneliese Maier","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5635,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue philosophique de Louvain","volume":"47","issue":"","pages":"334-350"}},"sort":[1949]}
| Title | Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafsîr kitâb al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d’Aquino |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Dianoia |
| Volume | 24 |
| Pages | 15-32 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, De anima, Averroism, Siger of Brabant, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Federico Minzoni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| A widespread historiographic commonplace, established by Thomas Aquinas himself in his Tractatus de unitate intellectus (1270), takes Siger of Brabant’s Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1265) to be a latin formulation of Ibn Rušd’s theory of the unity of the material intellect as exposed in the Tafsīr Kitāb al-Nafs (Long Commentary on the De anima, ca. 1186); according to the same view, Aquinas’ philosophy of mind would be the expression of a strongly antiaverroistic – and therefore more orthodox – kind of aristotelianism. Building on a thorough analysis of key texts in Aquinas’ Commentary on the Sentences (1255), I argue in this paper that those who hold Aquinas’ noetic to be anti-averroistic are greatly mistaken: while Siger’s always superficial rushdian inspiration is better understood against the background of a neoplatonic-tinged mind-body dualism clearly at odds with Ibn Rušd’s own strictly peripatetic ontology, Aquinas’ psychology, hylomorfic and not-dualist at its core, is aristotelian mainly inasmuch as it is rushdian. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5154","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5154,"authors_free":[{"id":5935,"entry_id":5154,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1682,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Federico Minzoni","free_first_name":"Federico","free_last_name":"Minzoni","norm_person":{"id":1682,"first_name":"Federico","last_name":"Minzoni","full_name":"Federico Minzoni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Federico Minzoni"}}],"entry_title":"Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino"},"abstract":"A widespread historiographic commonplace, established by Thomas Aquinas himself in his Tractatus de unitate intellectus (1270), takes Siger of Brabant\u2019s Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1265) to be a latin formulation of Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s theory of the unity of the material intellect as exposed in the Tafs\u012br Kit\u0101b al-Nafs (Long Commentary on the De anima, ca. 1186); according to the same view, Aquinas\u2019 philosophy of mind would be the expression of a strongly antiaverroistic \u2013 and therefore more orthodox \u2013 kind of aristotelianism. Building on a thorough analysis of key texts in Aquinas\u2019 Commentary on the Sentences (1255), I argue in this paper that those who hold Aquinas\u2019 noetic to be anti-averroistic are greatly mistaken: while Siger\u2019s always superficial rushdian inspiration is better understood against the background of a neoplatonic-tinged mind-body dualism clearly at odds with Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s own strictly peripatetic ontology, Aquinas\u2019 psychology, hylomorfic and not-dualist at its core, is aristotelian mainly inasmuch as it is rushdian. ","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1682,"full_name":"Federico Minzoni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5154,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dianoia","volume":"24","issue":"","pages":"15-32"}},"sort":["Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino"]}
| Title | Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe |
| Pages | 65–80 |
| Categories | Averroism, Aristotle, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Despite Renaissance humanists’ polemics against Averroes, interest in his writings grew during the sixteenth century. This interest was related to humanism. As Aristotelians became increasingly aware of the Greek commentators on Aristotle, many saw Averroes as an heir to the ancient tradition. Thus they believed that by reading his works they could gain access to a purer form of Aristotelianism. As a result, a number of scholars wrote commentaries on Averroes’s natural philosophical works, and the Commentator became a subject for both philosophical and philological commentary. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1743","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1743,"authors_free":[{"id":2010,"entry_id":1743,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance"},"abstract":"Despite Renaissance humanists\u2019 polemics against Averroes, interest in his writings grew during the sixteenth century. This interest was related to humanism. As Aristotelians became increasingly aware of the Greek commentators on Aristotle, many saw Averroes as an heir to the ancient tradition. Thus they believed that by reading his works they could gain access to a purer form of Aristotelianism. As a result, a number of scholars wrote commentaries on Averroes\u2019s natural philosophical works, and the Commentator became a subject for both philosophical and philological commentary.","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5240-5_4","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1743,"section_of":241,"pages":"65\u201380","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":241,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":241,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Springer","series":"International Archives of the History of Ideas","volume":"211","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance"]}
| Title | John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes’ Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3 |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Published in | Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives |
| Pages | 127–134 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Physics, Averroism |
| Author(s) | Andrea Vella |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5106","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5106,"authors_free":[{"id":5881,"entry_id":5106,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1275,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andrea Vella","free_first_name":"Andrea","free_last_name":"Vella","norm_person":{"id":1275,"first_name":"Andrea","last_name":"Vella","full_name":"Andrea Vella","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/141393246","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andrea Vella"}}],"entry_title":"John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes\u2019 Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes\u2019 Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1275,"full_name":"Andrea Vella","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5106,"section_of":5105,"pages":"127\u2013134","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5105,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2017","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"The reason\/no-reason conceptual pair (also declinable in the similar forms of rational\/a-rational, logical\/a-logical) pervades the history of Western thought from the archaic era up to contemporary times. Perceived in different historical periods and in different cultural forms either as a conflict or as a vital coexistence, the reason\/no-reason pair was first theorized and legitimated as a sharp contrast in antiquity with the Pythagorean systoichiai, and at the dawn of the twentieth century it was successfully exemplified by Nietzsche through the opposition between Apollonian and Dionysian principles, which denotes respectively the harmonious, orderly, 'bright' side of the human soul, and the chaotic one, wild, instinctive, passionate, 'dark'. This volume is the outcome of the work of an international research group, which intended to cover some aspects of this dichotomy with the specific end to prove that the two sides of the human 'soul' don't contradict each other - in such a way that one excludes, ontologically and axiologically, the other - but they are rather closely interrelated and interdependent. Scholars with different expertise in the history of thought tackled diachronically some key moments of this story, from different angles and with different approaches, from ancient thought to modern neurosciences. The volume contains contributions of Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Institute of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University), R. Loredana Cardullo (University of Catania), Francesco Coniglione (University of Catania), Santo Di Nuovo (University of Catania), Daniele Iozzia (University of Catania), Syliane Malinowski-Charles (Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec \u00e0 Trois Rivi\u00e8re), Concetto Martello (University of Catania), Alexandra Michalewski (Paris - Sorbonne, CNRS), Chiara Militello (University of Catania), Sebastian Moro Tornese (United Kingdom), Jean-Marc Narbonne (Laval Universit\u00e9, Canada), Anne Sheppard (Royal Holloway, University of London), Salvatore Vasta (University of Catania), Andrea Vella (University of Catania).","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5105,"pubplace":"Sankt Augustin","publisher":"Academia Verlag","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes\u2019 Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3"]}
| Title | Les commentaires sur la Physique d'Aristote attribués à Siger de Brabant |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1949 |
| Journal | Revue philosophique de Louvain |
| Volume | 47 |
| Pages | 334-350 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, Physics, Averroism, Latin Averroism, Siger of Brabant |
| Author(s) | Anneliese Maier |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26333245 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5635","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5635,"authors_free":[{"id":6540,"entry_id":5635,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1866,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anneliese Maier","free_first_name":"Anneliese ","free_last_name":"Maier","norm_person":{"id":1866,"first_name":"Anneliese ","last_name":"Maier","full_name":"Anneliese Maier","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118781286","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Anneliese Maier"}}],"entry_title":"Les commentaires sur la Physique d'Aristote attribu\u00e9s \u00e0 Siger de Brabant","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Les commentaires sur la Physique d'Aristote attribu\u00e9s \u00e0 Siger de Brabant"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1949","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26333245","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"}],"authors":[{"id":1866,"full_name":"Anneliese Maier","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5635,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue philosophique de Louvain","volume":"47","issue":"","pages":"334-350"}},"sort":["Les commentaires sur la Physique d'Aristote attribu\u00e9s \u00e0 Siger de Brabant"]}