| Title | Signe physique et signe métaphysique. Averroès contre Avicenne sur le statut épistémologique des sciences de l’être |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2014 |
| Published in | Nature et sagesse. Les rapports entre physique et Métaphysique dans la tradition aristotélicienne. Recueil de textes en hommage à Pierre Pellegrin |
| Pages | 429–473 |
| Categories | Physics, Metaphysics, Avicenna, Ontology |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5272","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5272,"authors_free":[{"id":6086,"entry_id":5272,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Signe physique et signe m\u00e9taphysique. Averro\u00e8s contre Avicenne sur le statut \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique des sciences de l\u2019\u00eatre","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Signe physique et signe m\u00e9taphysique. Averro\u00e8s contre Avicenne sur le statut \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique des sciences de l\u2019\u00eatre"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2014","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":65,"category_name":"Ontology","link":"bib?categories[]=Ontology"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5272,"section_of":2055,"pages":"429\u2013473","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":2055,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":1860,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Nature et sagesse. Les rapports entre physique et M\u00e9taphysique dans la tradition aristot\u00e9licienne. Recueil de textes en hommage \u00e0 Pierre Pellegrin","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2014","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2014","abstract":"English summary: The relationship between physics and metaphysics is one of the core questions at the heart of Aristotelian philosophy. The collected studies in this volume explore the epistemological connections between these two sciences, and especially certain essential points raised in Greek and Arabic history concerning this debate. \r\n\r\nFrench description: La question de savoir quel type de rapport entretiennent la physique et la metaphysique est au coeur du systeme philosophique d'Aristote. Ce rapport, toutefois, n'est pas facile a saisir, non seulement parce qu'Aristote ne l'a jamais defini de facon claire, mais parce qu'il est delicat d'en comprendre la nature a la lumiere de la theorie de la science exposee dans les Seconds Analytiques. En effet, Aristote affirme d'une part que la metaphysique, concue comme science universelle, n'a pas de genre-sujet propre, et d'autre part que la physique, quoique seconde par rapport a la metaphysique, en assure le fondement. C'est de ce rapport ambivalent que decoule le plus grand nombre d'apories liees au statut epistemologique de chacune des deux sciences comme a la nature de leur rapport. Les contributions reunies dans ce recueil s'inscrivent dans ce contexte theorique complexe. Elles portent moins sur la difficulte de comprendre le critere ou les criteres d'organisation des traites qu'on appelle Metaphysique et Physique que sur celle de presenter et de justifier l'entrelacement epistemologique de ces deux sciences, concues comme deux disciplines unitaires mais plurielles. Sans pretendre reconstruire l'histoire de la question, l'un des enjeux de ce volume fut aussi de degager, passe le texte meme d'Aristote, certains points nodaux de l'histoire grecque et arabe du debat.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":1,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":2055,"pubplace":"Louvain-La-Neuve","publisher":"Peeters","series":"Aristote. Traductions et etudes","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science |
| Volume | 69 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Physics, Metaphysics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This book examines the question whether medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (Arabic Ibn Sīnā 980-1037) and Averroes (Arabic Ibn Rushd 1126-1198) are determinists. With a focus on physics and metaphysics it studies their views on chance events in nature, as well as matter, in particular prime matter, and divine providence. In addition it sets their positions against the historical/philosophical background that influenced their response, the Greco-Arabic philosophical tradition - Aristotelian and Neoplatonic - on the one hand, and the tradition of Islamic theology (kalām) on the other. In comparing their philosophical systems, it lays emphasis on the way in which Avicenna and Averroes use these traditions to offer an original answer to the problem of determinism. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1478","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1478,"authors_free":[{"id":1692,"entry_id":1478,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"This book examines the question whether medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (Arabic Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 980-1037) and Averroes (Arabic Ibn Rushd 1126-1198) are determinists. With a focus on physics and metaphysics it studies their views on chance events in nature, as well as matter, in particular prime matter, and divine providence. In addition it sets their positions against the historical\/philosophical background that influenced their response, the Greco-Arabic philosophical tradition - Aristotelian and Neoplatonic - on the one hand, and the tradition of Islamic theology (kal\u0101m) on the other. In comparing their philosophical systems, it lays emphasis on the way in which Avicenna and Averroes use these traditions to offer an original answer to the problem of determinism.","btype":1,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/ej.9789004155879.i-252","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1478,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science","volume":"69","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2007]}
| Title | Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science |
| Volume | 69 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Physics, Metaphysics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This book examines the question whether medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (Arabic Ibn Sīnā 980-1037) and Averroes (Arabic Ibn Rushd 1126-1198) are determinists. With a focus on physics and metaphysics it studies their views on chance events in nature, as well as matter, in particular prime matter, and divine providence. In addition it sets their positions against the historical/philosophical background that influenced their response, the Greco-Arabic philosophical tradition - Aristotelian and Neoplatonic - on the one hand, and the tradition of Islamic theology (kalām) on the other. In comparing their philosophical systems, it lays emphasis on the way in which Avicenna and Averroes use these traditions to offer an original answer to the problem of determinism. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1478","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1478,"authors_free":[{"id":1692,"entry_id":1478,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"This book examines the question whether medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (Arabic Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 980-1037) and Averroes (Arabic Ibn Rushd 1126-1198) are determinists. With a focus on physics and metaphysics it studies their views on chance events in nature, as well as matter, in particular prime matter, and divine providence. In addition it sets their positions against the historical\/philosophical background that influenced their response, the Greco-Arabic philosophical tradition - Aristotelian and Neoplatonic - on the one hand, and the tradition of Islamic theology (kal\u0101m) on the other. In comparing their philosophical systems, it lays emphasis on the way in which Avicenna and Averroes use these traditions to offer an original answer to the problem of determinism.","btype":1,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/ej.9789004155879.i-252","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1478,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science","volume":"69","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes"]}
| Title | Signe physique et signe métaphysique. Averroès contre Avicenne sur le statut épistémologique des sciences de l’être |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2014 |
| Published in | Nature et sagesse. Les rapports entre physique et Métaphysique dans la tradition aristotélicienne. Recueil de textes en hommage à Pierre Pellegrin |
| Pages | 429–473 |
| Categories | Physics, Metaphysics, Avicenna, Ontology |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5272","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5272,"authors_free":[{"id":6086,"entry_id":5272,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Signe physique et signe m\u00e9taphysique. Averro\u00e8s contre Avicenne sur le statut \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique des sciences de l\u2019\u00eatre","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Signe physique et signe m\u00e9taphysique. Averro\u00e8s contre Avicenne sur le statut \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique des sciences de l\u2019\u00eatre"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2014","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":65,"category_name":"Ontology","link":"bib?categories[]=Ontology"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5272,"section_of":2055,"pages":"429\u2013473","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":2055,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":1860,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Nature et sagesse. Les rapports entre physique et M\u00e9taphysique dans la tradition aristot\u00e9licienne. Recueil de textes en hommage \u00e0 Pierre Pellegrin","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2014","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2014","abstract":"English summary: The relationship between physics and metaphysics is one of the core questions at the heart of Aristotelian philosophy. The collected studies in this volume explore the epistemological connections between these two sciences, and especially certain essential points raised in Greek and Arabic history concerning this debate. \r\n\r\nFrench description: La question de savoir quel type de rapport entretiennent la physique et la metaphysique est au coeur du systeme philosophique d'Aristote. Ce rapport, toutefois, n'est pas facile a saisir, non seulement parce qu'Aristote ne l'a jamais defini de facon claire, mais parce qu'il est delicat d'en comprendre la nature a la lumiere de la theorie de la science exposee dans les Seconds Analytiques. En effet, Aristote affirme d'une part que la metaphysique, concue comme science universelle, n'a pas de genre-sujet propre, et d'autre part que la physique, quoique seconde par rapport a la metaphysique, en assure le fondement. C'est de ce rapport ambivalent que decoule le plus grand nombre d'apories liees au statut epistemologique de chacune des deux sciences comme a la nature de leur rapport. Les contributions reunies dans ce recueil s'inscrivent dans ce contexte theorique complexe. Elles portent moins sur la difficulte de comprendre le critere ou les criteres d'organisation des traites qu'on appelle Metaphysique et Physique que sur celle de presenter et de justifier l'entrelacement epistemologique de ces deux sciences, concues comme deux disciplines unitaires mais plurielles. Sans pretendre reconstruire l'histoire de la question, l'un des enjeux de ce volume fut aussi de degager, passe le texte meme d'Aristote, certains points nodaux de l'histoire grecque et arabe du debat.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":1,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":2055,"pubplace":"Louvain-La-Neuve","publisher":"Peeters","series":"Aristote. Traductions et etudes","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Signe physique et signe m\u00e9taphysique. Averro\u00e8s contre Avicenne sur le statut \u00e9pist\u00e9mologique des sciences de l\u2019\u00eatre"]}