{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5244","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5244,"authors_free":[{"id":6053,"entry_id":5244,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joaqu\u00edn Garc\u00eda-Huidobro","free_first_name":"Joaqu\u00edn","free_last_name":"Garc\u00eda-Huidobro","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes y las cosas justas per naturaleza","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes y las cosas justas per naturaleza"},"abstract":"En su comentario a la \u00c9tica a Nic\u00f3maco, Averroes se ocup\u00f3 del pasaje donde Arist\u00f3teles distingue entre las cosas que son justas por naturaleza y aqu\u00e9llas que lo son en virtud de la ley (V, 7 1134b18-1135a5). Su comentario es particularmente breve, pero plantea algunas dificultades importantes, como su alusi\u00f3n a un derecho naturale legale, que, seg\u00fan Leo Strauss, vendr\u00eda a ser simplemente un derecho positivo de aceptaci\u00f3n general. En este art\u00edculo se busca caracterizar lo justo natural y lo justo positivo en el comentario de Averroes y mostrar el alcance de la variaci\u00f3n de los criterios propios de la justicia positiva. ","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5209\/rev_ASHF.2015.v32.n2.49970 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5244,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del seminario de historia de la filosof\u00eda","volume":"32","issue":"2","pages":"393\u2013413"}},"sort":["Averroes y las cosas justas per naturaleza"]}