| Title | Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averróis |
| Translation | Religious assent and Philosophy in Averroes’ Fasl al-maqal |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | DoisPontos |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 113-132 |
| Categories | Law, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Arthur Klik |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| O Fasl al-maqal, umas das obras originais de Averróis, se destaca por seu caráter polêmico. Sendo redigida como um pronunciamento jurídico, tem como um de seus objetivos principais analisar o estatuto da filosofia em face da Lei islâmica, ao verificar qual é a atitude que deve ser adotada por todo aquele que travar contato com as obras da antiguidade grega. Em um cenário em que a legitimidade da filosofia se coloca em questão, o diagnóstico e a solução propostos por Averróis se destacam ao apresentar uma interpretação singular da Lei ante a filosofia, concebendo a segunda como um elemento necessário para a saúde da comunidade. Este artigo pretende analisar essa interpretação, na qual três pontos se colocam na consideração da relação entre filosofia e revelação: o (1) asseguramento da possibilidade do assentimento religioso individual e (2) da manutenção do bem-estar geral junto à (3) possibilidade de se afirmar a legitimidade de um intérprete que garanta o assentimento correto aos crentes não filósofos An original work of Averroes, the Fasl al-maqal is remarked by its controversial character. Composed as a juridical statement, one of its main goals is to analyze the role of philosophy in Islamic Law determining which attitude must be adopted by those aware of the works of Greek antiquity. Facing a problematic scenario in which the legitimacy of philosophy is putted in question, the diagnosis and solution proposed by Averroes emphasizes a unique interpretation of the Law guided by Philosophy devised as a required element to achieve community welfare. This article intends to analyze that interpretation in which three points arise about the relationship between philosophy and revelation: (1) the insurance of the individual possibility of religious assent; (2) the endurance of common welfare, both associated to (3) the possibility of assert the legitimacy of an interpreter able to assure the correct assent to common believers |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5560","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5560,"authors_free":[{"id":6454,"entry_id":5560,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Arthur Klik","free_first_name":"Arthur ","free_last_name":"Klik","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averr\u00f3is","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Religious assent and Philosophy in Averroes\u2019 Fasl al-maqal","main_title":{"title":"Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averr\u00f3is"},"abstract":"O Fasl al-maqal, umas das obras originais de Averr\u00f3is, se destaca por seu car\u00e1ter pol\u00eamico. Sendo redigida como um pronunciamento jur\u00eddico, tem como um de seus objetivos principais analisar o estatuto da filosofia em face da Lei isl\u00e2mica, ao verificar qual \u00e9 a atitude que deve ser adotada por todo aquele que travar contato com as obras da antiguidade grega. Em um cen\u00e1rio em que a legitimidade da filosofia se coloca em quest\u00e3o, o diagn\u00f3stico e a solu\u00e7\u00e3o propostos por Averr\u00f3is se destacam ao apresentar uma interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o singular da Lei ante a filosofia, concebendo a segunda como um elemento necess\u00e1rio para a sa\u00fade da comunidade. Este artigo pretende analisar essa interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o, na qual tr\u00eas pontos se colocam na considera\u00e7\u00e3o da rela\u00e7\u00e3o entre filosofia e revela\u00e7\u00e3o: o (1) \r\nasseguramento da possibilidade do assentimento religioso individual e (2) da manuten\u00e7\u00e3o do bem-estar geral junto \u00e0 (3) possibilidade de se afirmar a legitimidade de um int\u00e9rprete que garanta o assentimento correto aos crentes n\u00e3o fil\u00f3sofos \r\n\r\nAn original work of Averroes, the Fasl al-maqal is remarked by its controversial character. Composed as a juridical statement, one of its main goals is to analyze the role of philosophy in Islamic Law determining which attitude must be adopted by those aware of the works of Greek antiquity. Facing a problematic scenario in which the legitimacy of philosophy is putted in question, the diagnosis and solution proposed by Averroes emphasizes a unique interpretation of the Law guided by Philosophy devised as a required element to achieve community welfare. This article intends to analyze that interpretation in which three points arise about the relationship between philosophy and revelation: (1) the insurance of the individual possibility of religious assent; (2) the endurance of \r\ncommon welfare, both associated to (3) the possibility of assert the legitimacy of an interpreter able to assure the correct assent to common believers","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Portuguese","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5560,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"DoisPontos","volume":"18","issue":"1","pages":"113-132"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–27 |
| Categories | Law, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Theology, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Karen Taliaferro |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article traces a Muslim tradition of natural law in the thought of Ibn Rushd. I argue that this notion of natural law enriches the concept of law and can mediate conflicts of human law and divine law in Islam. I discuss the ontology, then epistemology, of Ibn Rushd’s natural law, then situate the resultant conception of law within Islamic legal and theological contexts. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5198","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5198,"authors_free":[{"id":5989,"entry_id":5198,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Karen Taliaferro","free_first_name":"Karen","free_last_name":"Taliaferro","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law"},"abstract":"This article traces a Muslim tradition of natural law in the thought of Ibn Rushd. I argue that this notion of natural law enriches the concept of law and can mediate conflicts of human law and divine law in Islam. I discuss the ontology, then epistemology, of Ibn Rushd\u2019s natural law, then situate the resultant conception of law within Islamic legal and theological contexts.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jis\/etw045","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5198,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":" 28","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201327 "}},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | El filósofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo islámico de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Al-Qantara |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–68 |
| Categories | Law, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Diego R. Sarrió |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El presente artículo argumenta que por debajo del marco jurídico del Faṣl al-maqāl subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la razón con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliación en la aceptación de una teoría hermenéutica según la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano según su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el artículo sugiere que Averroes concibió la filosofía en términos cuasi religiosos, como la obra más noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los legítimos «herederos de los profetas». |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5289","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5289,"authors_free":[{"id":6108,"entry_id":5289,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Diego R. Sarri\u00f3","free_first_name":"Diego R.,","free_last_name":"Sarri\u00f3","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes"},"abstract":"El presente art\u00edculo argumenta que por debajo del marco jur\u00eddico del Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la raz\u00f3n con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliaci\u00f3n en la aceptaci\u00f3n de una teor\u00eda hermen\u00e9utica seg\u00fan la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano seg\u00fan su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el art\u00edculo sugiere que Averroes concibi\u00f3 la filosof\u00eda en t\u00e9rminos cuasi religiosos, como la obra m\u00e1s noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los leg\u00edtimos \u00abherederos de los profetas\u00bb.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/alqantara.2015.002 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5289,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qantara","volume":"36","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201368"}},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | La pensée libre d'Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2013 |
| Journal | Analecta Husserliana |
| Volume | 114 |
| Pages | 371-382 |
| Categories | Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Angèle Kremer Marietti |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| With “La pensée libre d’Averroès”, I wished to join the important themes of Philosophy and Religion as they are joined in Averroès’ thought, against the most conservative elements within Muslim societies, which disliked what appeared to be non-Muslim influences. Ibn Rushd (Averroès) wanted to encourage the study of philosophy, because he was sensitive to the increasing tensions that led to his banishment. Though written before his exile his DECISIVE TREATISE provides a defence for philosophers charged with unbelief. Therefore I took an interest in four approaches to Ibn Rusch’s free thought. The first one was the distinction and relation between revelation and philosophy. Ibn Rushd’s Decisive Treatise begins with the contention that Law commands the study of philosophy. Ibn Rushd based on some Quranic verses, such as “Reflect, you have a vision” (59.2) and “they give thought to the creation of heaven and earth” (3:191), that command human intellectual reflection upon God and his creation. Such obligation exists in religion, then a person who has the capacity of “natural intelligence” and “religious integrity” must begin to study philosophy. Averroès thought that philosophy could enlighten revelation, when this last might be difficult to be understood for human minds. The second point I treat is Averroès’s thought that written Law (scripture, in e. Qur’an) and spoken law could be complementary each other. The Law speaks of three ways for humans to discover truth and interpret scripture: the demonstrative, the dialectical and the rhetorical. Therefore there are philosophers, theologians and the common masses. Ibn Rushd thought that demonstrative truth cannot conflict with scripture, because God gave various meanings and interpretations. Besides, the early Muslim community affirmed that scripture had both an apparent meaning and an inner meaning. Also, if it occurs that there is no consensus about a particular passage, its meaning is free for interpretation. My third point concerns the precise analysis of what is letter and what is spirit or “sense” -as the contemporary philosophers ans phenomenologues think now- on the real meaning of this letter: the sense or the way that the letter must be understood. Finally may be joined the way of right thinking, or what could be the special form of procedure with its results. In the fourth point, I refer to another treatise, on the doctrine of God known as the EXPOSITION OF THE METHODS OF PROOF CONCERNING THE BELIEFS OF THE COMMUNITY. Ibn Rushd then wanted to examine the religious doctrines that are held by the public and to determine if any of the many doctrines expounded by the different sects were the intention of the “lawgiver”. Meanwhile, he identified sects that have distorted the scriptures and developed innovative doctrines not compatible with Islam. Some arguments are examined: the first is the argument of Providence, in which one can observe that everything in the universe serves the purpose of humanity. The second is the argument of invention of plants and animals. Then he tried to explain the nature and attributes of God. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2036","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2036,"authors_free":[{"id":2476,"entry_id":2036,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1615,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","free_first_name":"Ang\u00e8le","free_last_name":"Kremer Marietti","norm_person":{"id":1615,"first_name":"Ang\u00e8le","last_name":"Kremer Marietti","full_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133757242","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/108823722","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti"}}],"entry_title":"La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"With \u201cLa pens\u00e9e libre d\u2019Averro\u00e8s\u201d, I wished to join the important themes of Philosophy and Religion as they are joined in Averro\u00e8s\u2019 thought, against the most conservative elements within Muslim societies, which disliked what appeared to be non-Muslim influences. Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s) wanted to encourage the study of philosophy, because he was sensitive to the increasing tensions that led to his banishment. Though written before his exile his DECISIVE TREATISE provides a defence for philosophers charged with unbelief. Therefore I took an interest in four approaches to Ibn Rusch\u2019s free thought. The first one was the distinction and relation between revelation and philosophy. Ibn Rushd\u2019s Decisive Treatise begins with the contention that Law commands the study of philosophy. Ibn Rushd based on some Quranic verses, such as \u201cReflect, you have a vision\u201d (59.2) and \u201cthey give thought to the creation of heaven and earth\u201d (3:191), that command human intellectual reflection upon God and his creation. Such obligation exists in religion, then a person who has the capacity of \u201cnatural intelligence\u201d and \u201creligious integrity\u201d must begin to study philosophy. Averro\u00e8s thought that philosophy could enlighten revelation, when this last might be difficult to be understood for human minds. The second point I treat is Averro\u00e8s\u2019s thought that written Law (scripture, in e. Qur\u2019an) and spoken law could be complementary each other. The Law speaks of three ways for humans to discover truth and interpret scripture: the demonstrative, the dialectical and the rhetorical. Therefore there are philosophers, theologians and the common masses. Ibn Rushd thought that demonstrative truth cannot conflict with scripture, because God gave various meanings and interpretations. Besides, the early Muslim community affirmed that scripture had both an apparent meaning and an inner meaning. Also, if it occurs that there is no consensus about a particular passage, its meaning is free for interpretation. My third point concerns the precise analysis of what is letter and what is spirit or \u201csense\u201d -as the contemporary philosophers ans phenomenologues think now- on the real meaning of this letter: the sense or the way that the letter must be understood. Finally may be joined the way of right thinking, or what could be the special form of procedure with its results. In the fourth point, I refer to another treatise, on the doctrine of God known as the EXPOSITION OF THE METHODS OF PROOF CONCERNING THE BELIEFS OF THE COMMUNITY. Ibn Rushd then wanted to examine the religious doctrines that are held by the public and to determine if any of the many doctrines expounded by the different sects were the intention of the \u201clawgiver\u201d. Meanwhile, he identified sects that have distorted the scriptures and developed innovative doctrines not compatible with Islam. Some arguments are examined: the first is the argument of Providence, in which one can observe that everything in the universe serves the purpose of humanity. The second is the argument of invention of plants and animals. Then he tried to explain the nature and attributes of God.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1615,"full_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2036,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Analecta Husserliana","volume":"114","issue":null,"pages":"371-382"}},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The ‘Decisive Treatise’ of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Peripatetikos |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 1-25 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Thérèse Bonin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5337","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5337,"authors_free":[{"id":6183,"entry_id":5337,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1785,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","free_first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se ","free_last_name":"Bonin","norm_person":{"id":1785,"first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se","last_name":"Bonin","full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1197840044","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin"}}],"entry_title":"A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1785,"full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5337,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Peripatetikos","volume":"6 ","issue":"","pages":"1-25"}},"sort":[2007]}
| Title | Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghazālī?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatwā on Awliyā' Allāh |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Der Islam |
| Volume | 83 |
| Pages | 137–156 |
| Categories | Theology, Law |
| Author(s) | Delfina Serrano Ruano , Delfina Serrano Ruano |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1554","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1554,"authors_free":[{"id":1783,"entry_id":1554,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1381,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","free_first_name":"Delfina","free_last_name":"Serrano Ruano","norm_person":{"id":1381,"first_name":"Delfina","last_name":"Serrano Ruano","full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5174102","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Delfina Serrano Ruano"}},{"id":1784,"entry_id":1554,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1381,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","free_first_name":"Delfina","free_last_name":"Serrano Ruano","norm_person":{"id":1381,"first_name":"Delfina","last_name":"Serrano Ruano","full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5174102","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Delfina Serrano Ruano"}}],"entry_title":"Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatw\u0101 on Awliy\u0101' All\u0101h","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatw\u0101 on Awliy\u0101' All\u0101h"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":1381,"full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","role":1},{"id":1381,"full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1554,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Der Islam","volume":"83","issue":null,"pages":"137\u2013156"}},"sort":[2006]}
| Title | Philosophy before the Law. Averroës's Decisive Treatise |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Critical Inquiry |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 412–442 |
| Categories | Theology, Law, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Daniel Heller-Roazen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/41959085 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1426","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1426,"authors_free":[{"id":1621,"entry_id":1426,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1331,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Daniel Heller-Roazen","free_first_name":"Daniel","free_last_name":"Heller-Roazen","norm_person":{"id":1331,"first_name":"Daniel","last_name":"Heller-Roazen","full_name":"Daniel Heller-Roazen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134084187","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/76597876","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Daniel Heller-Roazen"}}],"entry_title":"Philosophy before the Law. Averro\u00ebs's Decisive Treatise","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy before the Law. Averro\u00ebs's Decisive Treatise"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/41959085","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1331,"full_name":"Daniel Heller-Roazen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1426,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Critical Inquiry","volume":"32","issue":"3","pages":"412\u2013442"}},"sort":[2006]}
| Title | Il Kašf ʿan manāhiğ di Averroè. Confronto fra la versione di Abraham De Balmes e le citazioni di Calo Calonimo nel De mundi creatione |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2004 |
| Journal | Materia Giudaica |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1–2 |
| Pages | 241–248 |
| Categories | Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Silvia Di Donato |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1374","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1374,"authors_free":[{"id":1566,"entry_id":1374,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1025,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Di Donato","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Di Donato","norm_person":{"id":1025,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Di Donato","full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1034945653","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/171527049","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Silvia Di Donato"}}],"entry_title":"Il Ka\u0161f \u02bfan man\u0101hi\u011f di Averro\u00e8. Confronto fra la versione di Abraham De Balmes e le citazioni di Calo Calonimo nel De mundi creatione","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Il Ka\u0161f \u02bfan man\u0101hi\u011f di Averro\u00e8. Confronto fra la versione di Abraham De Balmes e le citazioni di Calo Calonimo nel De mundi creatione"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2004","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1025,"full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1374,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Materia Giudaica","volume":"9","issue":"1\u20132","pages":"241\u2013248"}},"sort":[2004]}
| Title | Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1997 |
| Journal | History of Philosophy Quarterly |
| Volume | 4 |
| Pages | 139–153 |
| Categories | Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Jorge J. E. Gracia |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/27744734 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"464","_score":null,"_source":{"id":464,"authors_free":[{"id":607,"entry_id":464,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":759,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","free_first_name":"Jorge J. E.","free_last_name":"Gracia","norm_person":{"id":759,"first_name":"Jorge J. E.","last_name":"Gracia","full_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132482223","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/108952016","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd132482223.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jorge J. E. Gracia"}}],"entry_title":"Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27744734","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":759,"full_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":464,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"4","issue":null,"pages":"139\u2013153"}},"sort":[1997]}
| Title | アヴェロエス研究 - 二重真理説 |
| Translation | Averroes Research - The Double-Truth-Theory |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Japanese |
| Date | 1982 |
| Journal | Kinki Daigaku Kyōyōbu Kenkyū Kiyō |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 157-172 |
| Categories | Law, Epistemology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Chisato Tanaka |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5533","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5533,"authors_free":[{"id":6426,"entry_id":5533,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1837,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chisato Tanaka","free_first_name":"Chisato","free_last_name":"Tanaka","norm_person":{"id":1837,"first_name":"Chisato","last_name":"Tanaka","full_name":"Chisato Tanaka","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Chisato Tanaka"}}],"entry_title":"\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Averroes Research - The Double-Truth-Theory","main_title":{"title":"\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1982","language":"Japanese","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1837,"full_name":"Chisato Tanaka","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5533,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Kinki Daigaku Ky\u014dy\u014dbu Kenky\u016b Kiy\u014d","volume":"13 ","issue":"3","pages":"157-172"}},"sort":[1982]}
| Title | A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The ‘Decisive Treatise’ of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Peripatetikos |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 1-25 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Thérèse Bonin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5337","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5337,"authors_free":[{"id":6183,"entry_id":5337,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1785,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","free_first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se ","free_last_name":"Bonin","norm_person":{"id":1785,"first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se","last_name":"Bonin","full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1197840044","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin"}}],"entry_title":"A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1785,"full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5337,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Peripatetikos","volume":"6 ","issue":"","pages":"1-25"}},"sort":["A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes"]}
| Title | Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averróis |
| Translation | Religious assent and Philosophy in Averroes’ Fasl al-maqal |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | DoisPontos |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 113-132 |
| Categories | Law, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Arthur Klik |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| O Fasl al-maqal, umas das obras originais de Averróis, se destaca por seu caráter polêmico. Sendo redigida como um pronunciamento jurídico, tem como um de seus objetivos principais analisar o estatuto da filosofia em face da Lei islâmica, ao verificar qual é a atitude que deve ser adotada por todo aquele que travar contato com as obras da antiguidade grega. Em um cenário em que a legitimidade da filosofia se coloca em questão, o diagnóstico e a solução propostos por Averróis se destacam ao apresentar uma interpretação singular da Lei ante a filosofia, concebendo a segunda como um elemento necessário para a saúde da comunidade. Este artigo pretende analisar essa interpretação, na qual três pontos se colocam na consideração da relação entre filosofia e revelação: o (1) asseguramento da possibilidade do assentimento religioso individual e (2) da manutenção do bem-estar geral junto à (3) possibilidade de se afirmar a legitimidade de um intérprete que garanta o assentimento correto aos crentes não filósofos An original work of Averroes, the Fasl al-maqal is remarked by its controversial character. Composed as a juridical statement, one of its main goals is to analyze the role of philosophy in Islamic Law determining which attitude must be adopted by those aware of the works of Greek antiquity. Facing a problematic scenario in which the legitimacy of philosophy is putted in question, the diagnosis and solution proposed by Averroes emphasizes a unique interpretation of the Law guided by Philosophy devised as a required element to achieve community welfare. This article intends to analyze that interpretation in which three points arise about the relationship between philosophy and revelation: (1) the insurance of the individual possibility of religious assent; (2) the endurance of common welfare, both associated to (3) the possibility of assert the legitimacy of an interpreter able to assure the correct assent to common believers |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5560","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5560,"authors_free":[{"id":6454,"entry_id":5560,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Arthur Klik","free_first_name":"Arthur ","free_last_name":"Klik","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averr\u00f3is","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Religious assent and Philosophy in Averroes\u2019 Fasl al-maqal","main_title":{"title":"Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averr\u00f3is"},"abstract":"O Fasl al-maqal, umas das obras originais de Averr\u00f3is, se destaca por seu car\u00e1ter pol\u00eamico. Sendo redigida como um pronunciamento jur\u00eddico, tem como um de seus objetivos principais analisar o estatuto da filosofia em face da Lei isl\u00e2mica, ao verificar qual \u00e9 a atitude que deve ser adotada por todo aquele que travar contato com as obras da antiguidade grega. Em um cen\u00e1rio em que a legitimidade da filosofia se coloca em quest\u00e3o, o diagn\u00f3stico e a solu\u00e7\u00e3o propostos por Averr\u00f3is se destacam ao apresentar uma interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o singular da Lei ante a filosofia, concebendo a segunda como um elemento necess\u00e1rio para a sa\u00fade da comunidade. Este artigo pretende analisar essa interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o, na qual tr\u00eas pontos se colocam na considera\u00e7\u00e3o da rela\u00e7\u00e3o entre filosofia e revela\u00e7\u00e3o: o (1) \r\nasseguramento da possibilidade do assentimento religioso individual e (2) da manuten\u00e7\u00e3o do bem-estar geral junto \u00e0 (3) possibilidade de se afirmar a legitimidade de um int\u00e9rprete que garanta o assentimento correto aos crentes n\u00e3o fil\u00f3sofos \r\n\r\nAn original work of Averroes, the Fasl al-maqal is remarked by its controversial character. Composed as a juridical statement, one of its main goals is to analyze the role of philosophy in Islamic Law determining which attitude must be adopted by those aware of the works of Greek antiquity. Facing a problematic scenario in which the legitimacy of philosophy is putted in question, the diagnosis and solution proposed by Averroes emphasizes a unique interpretation of the Law guided by Philosophy devised as a required element to achieve community welfare. This article intends to analyze that interpretation in which three points arise about the relationship between philosophy and revelation: (1) the insurance of the individual possibility of religious assent; (2) the endurance of \r\ncommon welfare, both associated to (3) the possibility of assert the legitimacy of an interpreter able to assure the correct assent to common believers","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Portuguese","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5560,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"DoisPontos","volume":"18","issue":"1","pages":"113-132"}},"sort":["Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averr\u00f3is"]}
| Title | El filósofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo islámico de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Al-Qantara |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–68 |
| Categories | Law, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Diego R. Sarrió |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El presente artículo argumenta que por debajo del marco jurídico del Faṣl al-maqāl subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la razón con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliación en la aceptación de una teoría hermenéutica según la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano según su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el artículo sugiere que Averroes concibió la filosofía en términos cuasi religiosos, como la obra más noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los legítimos «herederos de los profetas». |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5289","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5289,"authors_free":[{"id":6108,"entry_id":5289,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Diego R. Sarri\u00f3","free_first_name":"Diego R.,","free_last_name":"Sarri\u00f3","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes"},"abstract":"El presente art\u00edculo argumenta que por debajo del marco jur\u00eddico del Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la raz\u00f3n con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliaci\u00f3n en la aceptaci\u00f3n de una teor\u00eda hermen\u00e9utica seg\u00fan la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano seg\u00fan su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el art\u00edculo sugiere que Averroes concibi\u00f3 la filosof\u00eda en t\u00e9rminos cuasi religiosos, como la obra m\u00e1s noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los leg\u00edtimos \u00abherederos de los profetas\u00bb.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/alqantara.2015.002 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5289,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qantara","volume":"36","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201368"}},"sort":["El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–27 |
| Categories | Law, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Theology, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Karen Taliaferro |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article traces a Muslim tradition of natural law in the thought of Ibn Rushd. I argue that this notion of natural law enriches the concept of law and can mediate conflicts of human law and divine law in Islam. I discuss the ontology, then epistemology, of Ibn Rushd’s natural law, then situate the resultant conception of law within Islamic legal and theological contexts. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5198","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5198,"authors_free":[{"id":5989,"entry_id":5198,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Karen Taliaferro","free_first_name":"Karen","free_last_name":"Taliaferro","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law"},"abstract":"This article traces a Muslim tradition of natural law in the thought of Ibn Rushd. I argue that this notion of natural law enriches the concept of law and can mediate conflicts of human law and divine law in Islam. I discuss the ontology, then epistemology, of Ibn Rushd\u2019s natural law, then situate the resultant conception of law within Islamic legal and theological contexts.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jis\/etw045","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5198,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":" 28","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201327 "}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law"]}
| Title | Il Kašf ʿan manāhiğ di Averroè. Confronto fra la versione di Abraham De Balmes e le citazioni di Calo Calonimo nel De mundi creatione |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2004 |
| Journal | Materia Giudaica |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1–2 |
| Pages | 241–248 |
| Categories | Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Silvia Di Donato |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1374","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1374,"authors_free":[{"id":1566,"entry_id":1374,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1025,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Di Donato","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Di Donato","norm_person":{"id":1025,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Di Donato","full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1034945653","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/171527049","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Silvia Di Donato"}}],"entry_title":"Il Ka\u0161f \u02bfan man\u0101hi\u011f di Averro\u00e8. Confronto fra la versione di Abraham De Balmes e le citazioni di Calo Calonimo nel De mundi creatione","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Il Ka\u0161f \u02bfan man\u0101hi\u011f di Averro\u00e8. Confronto fra la versione di Abraham De Balmes e le citazioni di Calo Calonimo nel De mundi creatione"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2004","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1025,"full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1374,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Materia Giudaica","volume":"9","issue":"1\u20132","pages":"241\u2013248"}},"sort":["Il Ka\u0161f \u02bfan man\u0101hi\u011f di Averro\u00e8. Confronto fra la versione di Abraham De Balmes e le citazioni di Calo Calonimo nel De mundi creatione"]}
| Title | Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1997 |
| Journal | History of Philosophy Quarterly |
| Volume | 4 |
| Pages | 139–153 |
| Categories | Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Jorge J. E. Gracia |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/27744734 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"464","_score":null,"_source":{"id":464,"authors_free":[{"id":607,"entry_id":464,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":759,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","free_first_name":"Jorge J. E.","free_last_name":"Gracia","norm_person":{"id":759,"first_name":"Jorge J. E.","last_name":"Gracia","full_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132482223","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/108952016","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd132482223.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jorge J. E. Gracia"}}],"entry_title":"Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27744734","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":759,"full_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":464,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"4","issue":null,"pages":"139\u2013153"}},"sort":["Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts"]}
| Title | La pensée libre d'Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2013 |
| Journal | Analecta Husserliana |
| Volume | 114 |
| Pages | 371-382 |
| Categories | Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Angèle Kremer Marietti |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| With “La pensée libre d’Averroès”, I wished to join the important themes of Philosophy and Religion as they are joined in Averroès’ thought, against the most conservative elements within Muslim societies, which disliked what appeared to be non-Muslim influences. Ibn Rushd (Averroès) wanted to encourage the study of philosophy, because he was sensitive to the increasing tensions that led to his banishment. Though written before his exile his DECISIVE TREATISE provides a defence for philosophers charged with unbelief. Therefore I took an interest in four approaches to Ibn Rusch’s free thought. The first one was the distinction and relation between revelation and philosophy. Ibn Rushd’s Decisive Treatise begins with the contention that Law commands the study of philosophy. Ibn Rushd based on some Quranic verses, such as “Reflect, you have a vision” (59.2) and “they give thought to the creation of heaven and earth” (3:191), that command human intellectual reflection upon God and his creation. Such obligation exists in religion, then a person who has the capacity of “natural intelligence” and “religious integrity” must begin to study philosophy. Averroès thought that philosophy could enlighten revelation, when this last might be difficult to be understood for human minds. The second point I treat is Averroès’s thought that written Law (scripture, in e. Qur’an) and spoken law could be complementary each other. The Law speaks of three ways for humans to discover truth and interpret scripture: the demonstrative, the dialectical and the rhetorical. Therefore there are philosophers, theologians and the common masses. Ibn Rushd thought that demonstrative truth cannot conflict with scripture, because God gave various meanings and interpretations. Besides, the early Muslim community affirmed that scripture had both an apparent meaning and an inner meaning. Also, if it occurs that there is no consensus about a particular passage, its meaning is free for interpretation. My third point concerns the precise analysis of what is letter and what is spirit or “sense” -as the contemporary philosophers ans phenomenologues think now- on the real meaning of this letter: the sense or the way that the letter must be understood. Finally may be joined the way of right thinking, or what could be the special form of procedure with its results. In the fourth point, I refer to another treatise, on the doctrine of God known as the EXPOSITION OF THE METHODS OF PROOF CONCERNING THE BELIEFS OF THE COMMUNITY. Ibn Rushd then wanted to examine the religious doctrines that are held by the public and to determine if any of the many doctrines expounded by the different sects were the intention of the “lawgiver”. Meanwhile, he identified sects that have distorted the scriptures and developed innovative doctrines not compatible with Islam. Some arguments are examined: the first is the argument of Providence, in which one can observe that everything in the universe serves the purpose of humanity. The second is the argument of invention of plants and animals. Then he tried to explain the nature and attributes of God. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2036","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2036,"authors_free":[{"id":2476,"entry_id":2036,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1615,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","free_first_name":"Ang\u00e8le","free_last_name":"Kremer Marietti","norm_person":{"id":1615,"first_name":"Ang\u00e8le","last_name":"Kremer Marietti","full_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133757242","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/108823722","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti"}}],"entry_title":"La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"With \u201cLa pens\u00e9e libre d\u2019Averro\u00e8s\u201d, I wished to join the important themes of Philosophy and Religion as they are joined in Averro\u00e8s\u2019 thought, against the most conservative elements within Muslim societies, which disliked what appeared to be non-Muslim influences. Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s) wanted to encourage the study of philosophy, because he was sensitive to the increasing tensions that led to his banishment. Though written before his exile his DECISIVE TREATISE provides a defence for philosophers charged with unbelief. Therefore I took an interest in four approaches to Ibn Rusch\u2019s free thought. The first one was the distinction and relation between revelation and philosophy. Ibn Rushd\u2019s Decisive Treatise begins with the contention that Law commands the study of philosophy. Ibn Rushd based on some Quranic verses, such as \u201cReflect, you have a vision\u201d (59.2) and \u201cthey give thought to the creation of heaven and earth\u201d (3:191), that command human intellectual reflection upon God and his creation. Such obligation exists in religion, then a person who has the capacity of \u201cnatural intelligence\u201d and \u201creligious integrity\u201d must begin to study philosophy. Averro\u00e8s thought that philosophy could enlighten revelation, when this last might be difficult to be understood for human minds. The second point I treat is Averro\u00e8s\u2019s thought that written Law (scripture, in e. Qur\u2019an) and spoken law could be complementary each other. The Law speaks of three ways for humans to discover truth and interpret scripture: the demonstrative, the dialectical and the rhetorical. Therefore there are philosophers, theologians and the common masses. Ibn Rushd thought that demonstrative truth cannot conflict with scripture, because God gave various meanings and interpretations. Besides, the early Muslim community affirmed that scripture had both an apparent meaning and an inner meaning. Also, if it occurs that there is no consensus about a particular passage, its meaning is free for interpretation. My third point concerns the precise analysis of what is letter and what is spirit or \u201csense\u201d -as the contemporary philosophers ans phenomenologues think now- on the real meaning of this letter: the sense or the way that the letter must be understood. Finally may be joined the way of right thinking, or what could be the special form of procedure with its results. In the fourth point, I refer to another treatise, on the doctrine of God known as the EXPOSITION OF THE METHODS OF PROOF CONCERNING THE BELIEFS OF THE COMMUNITY. Ibn Rushd then wanted to examine the religious doctrines that are held by the public and to determine if any of the many doctrines expounded by the different sects were the intention of the \u201clawgiver\u201d. Meanwhile, he identified sects that have distorted the scriptures and developed innovative doctrines not compatible with Islam. Some arguments are examined: the first is the argument of Providence, in which one can observe that everything in the universe serves the purpose of humanity. The second is the argument of invention of plants and animals. Then he tried to explain the nature and attributes of God.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1615,"full_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2036,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Analecta Husserliana","volume":"114","issue":null,"pages":"371-382"}},"sort":["La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s"]}
| Title | Philosophy before the Law. Averroës's Decisive Treatise |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Critical Inquiry |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 412–442 |
| Categories | Theology, Law, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Daniel Heller-Roazen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/41959085 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1426","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1426,"authors_free":[{"id":1621,"entry_id":1426,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1331,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Daniel Heller-Roazen","free_first_name":"Daniel","free_last_name":"Heller-Roazen","norm_person":{"id":1331,"first_name":"Daniel","last_name":"Heller-Roazen","full_name":"Daniel Heller-Roazen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134084187","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/76597876","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Daniel Heller-Roazen"}}],"entry_title":"Philosophy before the Law. Averro\u00ebs's Decisive Treatise","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy before the Law. Averro\u00ebs's Decisive Treatise"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/41959085","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1331,"full_name":"Daniel Heller-Roazen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1426,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Critical Inquiry","volume":"32","issue":"3","pages":"412\u2013442"}},"sort":["Philosophy before the Law. Averro\u00ebs's Decisive Treatise"]}
| Title | Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghazālī?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatwā on Awliyā' Allāh |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Der Islam |
| Volume | 83 |
| Pages | 137–156 |
| Categories | Theology, Law |
| Author(s) | Delfina Serrano Ruano , Delfina Serrano Ruano |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1554","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1554,"authors_free":[{"id":1783,"entry_id":1554,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1381,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","free_first_name":"Delfina","free_last_name":"Serrano Ruano","norm_person":{"id":1381,"first_name":"Delfina","last_name":"Serrano Ruano","full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5174102","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Delfina Serrano Ruano"}},{"id":1784,"entry_id":1554,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1381,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","free_first_name":"Delfina","free_last_name":"Serrano Ruano","norm_person":{"id":1381,"first_name":"Delfina","last_name":"Serrano Ruano","full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5174102","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Delfina Serrano Ruano"}}],"entry_title":"Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatw\u0101 on Awliy\u0101' All\u0101h","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatw\u0101 on Awliy\u0101' All\u0101h"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":1381,"full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","role":1},{"id":1381,"full_name":"Delfina Serrano Ruano","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1554,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Der Islam","volume":"83","issue":null,"pages":"137\u2013156"}},"sort":["Why Did the Scholars of al-Andalus Distrust al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b?. Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's Fatw\u0101 on Awliy\u0101' All\u0101h"]}
| Title | アヴェロエス研究 - 二重真理説 |
| Translation | Averroes Research - The Double-Truth-Theory |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Japanese |
| Date | 1982 |
| Journal | Kinki Daigaku Kyōyōbu Kenkyū Kiyō |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 157-172 |
| Categories | Law, Epistemology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Chisato Tanaka |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5533","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5533,"authors_free":[{"id":6426,"entry_id":5533,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1837,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chisato Tanaka","free_first_name":"Chisato","free_last_name":"Tanaka","norm_person":{"id":1837,"first_name":"Chisato","last_name":"Tanaka","full_name":"Chisato Tanaka","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Chisato Tanaka"}}],"entry_title":"\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Averroes Research - The Double-Truth-Theory","main_title":{"title":"\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1982","language":"Japanese","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1837,"full_name":"Chisato Tanaka","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5533,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Kinki Daigaku Ky\u014dy\u014dbu Kenky\u016b Kiy\u014d","volume":"13 ","issue":"3","pages":"157-172"}},"sort":["\u30a2\u30f4\u30a7\u30ed\u30a8\u30b9\u7814\u7a76 - \u4e8c\u91cd\u771f\u7406\u8aac"]}