A Theory of Judgment in Averroes, 2021
By: Rayyan Dabbous
Title A Theory of Judgment in Averroes
Type Article
Language English
Date 2021
Journal Arab Studies Quarterly
Volume 43
Issue No. 3 (Summer 2021)
Pages 268–281
Categories Linguistics, Politics, Rhetoric, Law, Psychology
Author(s) Rayyan Dabbous
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5404","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5404,"authors_free":[{"id":6265,"entry_id":5404,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rayyan Dabbous","free_first_name":"Rayyan","free_last_name":"Dabbous","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Theory of Judgment in Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Theory of Judgment in Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.13169\/arabstudquar.43.3.0268","doi_url":"10.2307\/j50005550 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5404,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arab Studies Quarterly","volume":"43","issue":"No. 3 (Summer 2021)","pages":"268\u2013281"}},"sort":[2021]}

Ibn Rushd’s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform, 2019
By: Ayesha Omar
Title Ibn Rushd’s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform
Type Article
Language English
Date 2019
Journal The Medieval History Journal
Volume 22
Issue 1
Pages 131-155
Categories Law, Politics, Thomas
Author(s) Ayesha Omar
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Ibn Rushd’s the Decisive Treatise (1126–98) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd’s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5770","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5770,"authors_free":[{"id":6683,"entry_id":5770,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ayesha Omar","free_first_name":"Ayesha ","free_last_name":"Omar","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform"},"abstract":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s the Decisive Treatise (1126\u201398) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd\u2019s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0971945818801398","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5770,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Medieval History Journal","volume":"22","issue":"1","pages":"131-155"}},"sort":[2019]}

The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd’s Solution to the Problem of the “Virtuous Society”, 2019
By: Jaan S. Islam
Title The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd’s Solution to the Problem of the “Virtuous Society”
Type Article
Language English
Date 2019
Journal Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies
Volume 4
Issue 1
Pages 43–65
Categories Politics, Law, Commentary, Plato
Author(s) Jaan S. Islam
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the “virtuous society” and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Sharī‘a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Plato’s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between “religious” and “political” (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd’s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5078","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5078,"authors_free":[{"id":5839,"entry_id":5078,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jaan S. Islam","free_first_name":"Jaan S. ","free_last_name":"Islam","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"},"abstract":"This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the \u201cvirtuous society\u201d and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Shar\u012b\u2018a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between \u201creligious\u201d and \u201cpolitical\u201d (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5078,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"4","issue":"1","pages":"43\u201365"}},"sort":[2019]}

On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being, 2006
By: Charles E. Butterworth
Title On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being
Type Article
Language English
Date 2006
Journal The Good Society
Volume 15
Issue 2
Pages 53-55
Categories Law, Politics
Author(s) Charles E. Butterworth
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5759","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5759,"authors_free":[{"id":6668,"entry_id":5759,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":123,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","free_first_name":"Charles E. ","free_last_name":"Butterworth","norm_person":{"id":123,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105338856X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/41853950","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles E. Butterworth"}}],"entry_title":"On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/25702820","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":123,"full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5759,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Good Society","volume":"15","issue":"2","pages":"53-55"}},"sort":[2006]}

Zwischen nomos und scharīʿa. Staatsverständnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat, 2002
By: Michael Jainzik
Title Zwischen nomos und scharīʿa. Staatsverständnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat
Type Article
Language German
Date 2002
Journal Concilium medii aevi. Zeitschrift für Geschichte, Kunst und Kultur des Mittelalters und der Frühen Neuzeit
Volume 5
Pages 143–186
Categories Politics, Law
Author(s) Michael Jainzik
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"746","_score":null,"_source":{"id":746,"authors_free":[{"id":905,"entry_id":746,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":933,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Jainzik","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Jainzik","norm_person":{"id":933,"first_name":"Michael","last_name":"Jainzik","full_name":"Michael Jainzik","short_ident":"MicJai","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Michael Jainzik"}}],"entry_title":"Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":933,"full_name":"Michael Jainzik","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":746,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Concilium medii aevi. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Geschichte, Kunst und Kultur des Mittelalters und der Fr\u00fchen Neuzeit","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"143\u2013186"}},"sort":[2002]}

A Theory of Judgment in Averroes, 2021
By: Rayyan Dabbous
Title A Theory of Judgment in Averroes
Type Article
Language English
Date 2021
Journal Arab Studies Quarterly
Volume 43
Issue No. 3 (Summer 2021)
Pages 268–281
Categories Linguistics, Politics, Rhetoric, Law, Psychology
Author(s) Rayyan Dabbous
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5404","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5404,"authors_free":[{"id":6265,"entry_id":5404,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rayyan Dabbous","free_first_name":"Rayyan","free_last_name":"Dabbous","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Theory of Judgment in Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Theory of Judgment in Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.13169\/arabstudquar.43.3.0268","doi_url":"10.2307\/j50005550 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5404,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arab Studies Quarterly","volume":"43","issue":"No. 3 (Summer 2021)","pages":"268\u2013281"}},"sort":["A Theory of Judgment in Averroes"]}

Ibn Rushd’s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform, 2019
By: Ayesha Omar
Title Ibn Rushd’s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform
Type Article
Language English
Date 2019
Journal The Medieval History Journal
Volume 22
Issue 1
Pages 131-155
Categories Law, Politics, Thomas
Author(s) Ayesha Omar
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
Ibn Rushd’s the Decisive Treatise (1126–98) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd’s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5770","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5770,"authors_free":[{"id":6683,"entry_id":5770,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ayesha Omar","free_first_name":"Ayesha ","free_last_name":"Omar","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform"},"abstract":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s the Decisive Treatise (1126\u201398) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd\u2019s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0971945818801398","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5770,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Medieval History Journal","volume":"22","issue":"1","pages":"131-155"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform"]}

On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being, 2006
By: Charles E. Butterworth
Title On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being
Type Article
Language English
Date 2006
Journal The Good Society
Volume 15
Issue 2
Pages 53-55
Categories Law, Politics
Author(s) Charles E. Butterworth
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5759","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5759,"authors_free":[{"id":6668,"entry_id":5759,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":123,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","free_first_name":"Charles E. ","free_last_name":"Butterworth","norm_person":{"id":123,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105338856X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/41853950","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles E. Butterworth"}}],"entry_title":"On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/25702820","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":123,"full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5759,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Good Society","volume":"15","issue":"2","pages":"53-55"}},"sort":["On Natural Right and Other Unwritten Guides to Political Well-Being"]}

The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd’s Solution to the Problem of the “Virtuous Society”, 2019
By: Jaan S. Islam
Title The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd’s Solution to the Problem of the “Virtuous Society”
Type Article
Language English
Date 2019
Journal Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies
Volume 4
Issue 1
Pages 43–65
Categories Politics, Law, Commentary, Plato
Author(s) Jaan S. Islam
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)
This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the “virtuous society” and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Sharī‘a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Plato’s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between “religious” and “political” (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd’s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5078","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5078,"authors_free":[{"id":5839,"entry_id":5078,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jaan S. Islam","free_first_name":"Jaan S. ","free_last_name":"Islam","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"},"abstract":"This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the \u201cvirtuous society\u201d and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Shar\u012b\u2018a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between \u201creligious\u201d and \u201cpolitical\u201d (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5078,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"4","issue":"1","pages":"43\u201365"}},"sort":["The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"]}

Zwischen nomos und scharīʿa. Staatsverständnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat, 2002
By: Michael Jainzik
Title Zwischen nomos und scharīʿa. Staatsverständnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat
Type Article
Language German
Date 2002
Journal Concilium medii aevi. Zeitschrift für Geschichte, Kunst und Kultur des Mittelalters und der Frühen Neuzeit
Volume 5
Pages 143–186
Categories Politics, Law
Author(s) Michael Jainzik
Publisher(s)
Translator(s)

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"746","_score":null,"_source":{"id":746,"authors_free":[{"id":905,"entry_id":746,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":933,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Jainzik","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Jainzik","norm_person":{"id":933,"first_name":"Michael","last_name":"Jainzik","full_name":"Michael Jainzik","short_ident":"MicJai","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Michael Jainzik"}}],"entry_title":"Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":933,"full_name":"Michael Jainzik","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":746,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Concilium medii aevi. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Geschichte, Kunst und Kultur des Mittelalters und der Fr\u00fchen Neuzeit","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"143\u2013186"}},"sort":["Zwischen nomos und schar\u012b\u02bfa. Staatsverst\u00e4ndnis und Staatsvision bei Averroes anhand seines Kommentars zu Platons Staat"]}

  • PAGE 1 OF 1