| Title | Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | History of Philosophy Quarterly |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 339-354 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Hamid Taieb |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5805","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5805,"authors_free":[{"id":6726,"entry_id":5805,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1902,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hamid Taieb","free_first_name":"Hamid ","free_last_name":"Taieb","norm_person":{"id":1902,"first_name":"Hamid ","last_name":"Taieb","full_name":"Hamid Taieb","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077921705","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Hamid Taieb"}}],"entry_title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis"},"abstract":"This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.5406\/21521026.39.4.03","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1902,"full_name":"Hamid Taieb","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5805,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"39","issue":"4","pages":"339-354"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd on Knowledge, Pleasures, and Analogy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Scienes in Muslim Contexts |
| Categories | Logic, Psychology, Metaphysics, Poetics, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://philosmus.org/en/archives/894 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5458","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5458,"authors_free":[{"id":6322,"entry_id":5458,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd on Knowledge, Pleasures, and Analogy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd on Knowledge, Pleasures, and Analogy"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/philosmus.org\/en\/archives\/894","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5458,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy and Scienes in Muslim Contexts","volume":"","issue":"","pages":""}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Publication Place | Cambridge |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Categories | Logic, Natural Philosophy, Psychology, Metaphysics, Law, Medicine, Ethics |
| Author(s) | Peter Adamson , Matteo Di Giovanni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"4977","_score":null,"_source":{"id":4977,"authors_free":[{"id":5710,"entry_id":4977,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}},{"id":5711,"entry_id":4977,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":734,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Matteo Di Giovanni","free_first_name":"Matteo","free_last_name":"Di Giovanni","norm_person":{"id":734,"first_name":"Matteo","last_name":"Di Giovanni","full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1130687570","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/9497149368819485980007","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Matteo di Giovanni"}}],"entry_title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":2},{"id":734,"full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":4977,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect’s Causation of the Intelligible |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–60 |
| Categories | Thomas, Psychology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Therese Scarpelli Cory |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article examines two medieval thinkers – Averroes and Aquinas – on the kind of causation exercised by the agent intellect in 'abstracting' or producing intelligibles from images in the imagination. It argues that abstraction in these thinkers should be interpreted in causal terms, as an act whereby images in the imagination, through the power of the agent intellect, educe their intelligible likeness in a receptive intellect. This Averroean-Thomistic causal approach to abstraction offers an intriguing alternative to the usual approach to abstraction as an epistemological content-sorting. The article also demonstrates the extensive common ground uniting these thinkers’ cognition theories, despite Aquinas’s well-known rejection of Averroes’s theory of separate Intellects. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5277","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5277,"authors_free":[{"id":6093,"entry_id":5277,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1760,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","free_first_name":"Therese Scarpelli","free_last_name":"Cory","norm_person":{"id":1760,"first_name":"Therese Scarpelli","last_name":"Cory","full_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1050852745","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Therese Scarpelli Cory"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect\u2019s Causation of the Intelligible","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect\u2019s Causation of the Intelligible"},"abstract":"This article examines two medieval thinkers \u2013 Averroes and Aquinas \u2013 on the kind of causation exercised by the agent intellect in 'abstracting' or producing intelligibles from images in the imagination. It argues that abstraction in these thinkers should be interpreted in causal terms, as an act whereby images in the imagination, through the power of the agent intellect, educe their intelligible likeness in a receptive intellect. This Averroean-Thomistic causal approach to abstraction offers an intriguing alternative to the usual approach to abstraction as an epistemological content-sorting. The article also demonstrates the extensive common ground uniting these thinkers\u2019 cognition theories, despite Aquinas\u2019s well-known rejection of Averroes\u2019s theory of separate Intellects.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1760,"full_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5277,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de Th\u00e9ologie et Philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"82","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201360"}},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Hafīd (Averroes) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Published in | Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500 |
| Pages | 494–501 |
| Categories | Biography, Surveys, Logic, Psychology, Cosmology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Taneli Kukkonen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes (1126–1198 CE) was the most famous and prolific commentator on Aristotle in all of medieval philosophy: 38 works are extant, at all levels of instruction. This concentration on Aristotle was not happenstance, instead, it reflects Averroes’ maturing philosophical outlook. For Averroes, Aristotle’s teaching came to represent the pinnacle of philosophical wisdom, and answers to all the most pressing problems in philosophy were to be found in a thorough and careful exploration of what that teaching truly implied. In the course of Averroes’ deepening investigations into Aristotelian lore, alternative interpretations were advanced and different traditions of thinking carefully laid side by side, producing a field guide to the Peripatetic tradition, as it was known to an Arabic scholar of the classical period. The resulting body of texts represents a high watermark in Aristotelian synthesis and systematization, even if Averroes failed in the end to resolve satisfactorily all the problems that had accumulated over the centuries. In addition to his Aristotelian Commentaries, Explications, and Compendia (which, besides Aristotle, encompassed works by Plato, Galen, Ptolemy, and al-Ġazālī), Averroes wrote smaller, independent essays and questions that explored contested issues in Aristotelian teaching; polemical works that argued the religious innocence and intellectual respectability of Peripatetic philosophy, correctly understood; and medical and legal treatises of solid but unspectacular standing. Averroes’ reputation was made in Latin Scholasticism and in Jewish circles of learning, while in the Arabic world his works fell mostly by the wayside. Today, his name is evoked in the Arabic world as a rallying-point for a rationalist Islam – a fitting legacy, if not always especially well grounded (modern-day Averroists displaying at best a cursory knowledge of the Commentator’s philosophy). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1781","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1781,"authors_free":[{"id":2054,"entry_id":1781,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":828,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","free_first_name":"Taneli","free_last_name":"Kukkonen","norm_person":{"id":828,"first_name":"Taneli","last_name":"Kukkonen","full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1064756859","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/242146822498007382889","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Taneli Kukkonen"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)"},"abstract":"Averroes (1126\u20131198 CE) was the most famous and prolific commentator on Aristotle in all of medieval philosophy: 38 works are extant, at all levels of instruction. This concentration on Aristotle was not happenstance, instead, it reflects Averroes\u2019 maturing philosophical outlook. For Averroes, Aristotle\u2019s teaching came to represent the pinnacle of philosophical wisdom, and answers to all the most pressing problems in philosophy were to be found in a thorough and careful exploration of what that teaching truly implied. In the course of Averroes\u2019 deepening investigations into Aristotelian lore, alternative interpretations were advanced and different traditions of thinking carefully laid side by side, producing a field guide to the Peripatetic tradition, as it was known to an Arabic scholar of the classical period. The resulting body of texts represents a high watermark in Aristotelian synthesis and systematization, even if Averroes failed in the end to resolve satisfactorily all the problems that had accumulated over the centuries.\r\n\r\nIn addition to his Aristotelian Commentaries, Explications, and Compendia (which, besides Aristotle, encompassed works by Plato, Galen, Ptolemy, and al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b), Averroes wrote smaller, independent essays and questions that explored contested issues in Aristotelian teaching; polemical works that argued the religious innocence and intellectual respectability of Peripatetic philosophy, correctly understood; and medical and legal treatises of solid but unspectacular standing. Averroes\u2019 reputation was made in Latin Scholasticism and in Jewish circles of learning, while in the Arabic world his works fell mostly by the wayside. Today, his name is evoked in the Arabic world as a rallying-point for a rationalist Islam \u2013 a fitting legacy, if not always especially well grounded (modern-day Averroists displaying at best a cursory knowledge of the Commentator\u2019s philosophy).","btype":2,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":13,"category_name":"Biography","link":"bib?categories[]=Biography"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":828,"full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1781,"section_of":247,"pages":"494\u2013501","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":247,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2011","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2011","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":247,"pubplace":"Dordrecht","publisher":"Springer","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":376,"entry_id":247,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1317,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","free_first_name":"Henrik","free_last_name":"Lagerlund","norm_person":{"id":1317,"first_name":"Henrik","last_name":"Lagerlund","full_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133619168","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/35317572","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd133619168.html","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Averroes' Philosophical Conception of Separate Intellect and God |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Published in | La lumière de l'intellect. La pensée scientifique et philosophique d'Averroès dans son temps. Actes du IVe colloque international de la SIHSPAI (Société internationale d'histoire des sciences et de la philosophie arabes et islamiques). Cordoue, 9–12 décembre 1998 |
| Pages | 391–404 |
| Categories | Psychology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1518","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1518,"authors_free":[{"id":1744,"entry_id":1518,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes' Philosophical Conception of Separate Intellect and God","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes' Philosophical Conception of Separate Intellect and God"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1518,"section_of":211,"pages":"391\u2013404","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":211,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"La lumi\u00e8re de l'intellect. La pens\u00e9e scientifique et philosophique d'Averro\u00e8s dans son temps. Actes du IVe colloque international de la SIHSPAI (Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 internationale d'histoire des sciences et de la philosophie arabes et islamiques). Cordoue, 9\u201312 d\u00e9cembre 1998","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2011","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2011","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":211,"pubplace":"Leuven","publisher":"Peeters","series":"Ancient and Classical Sciences and Philosophy","volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Universal Representation, and the Ontology of Individuation |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Publication Place | Newcastle upon Tyne |
| Publisher | Cambridge Scholars Publishing |
| Series | Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics |
| Volume | 5 |
| Categories | Psychology, Metaphysics, Avicenna, Aquinas, Ockham, Henry of Ghent |
| Author(s) | Gyula Klima , Alexander W. Hall |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| There is broad agreement in the medieval tradition that we conceive things in the world owing to the transmission of intelligible content through various media that culminates in the concept by which something in the world is cognitively present for us. Yet how the intelligible content is transmitted along with the nature of the ultimate object of cognition provoked ceaseless debate. The first three essays in Universal Representation, and the Ontology of Individuation consider these issues as they play out in the metaphysics and natural philosophy of Avicenna, Averroes, Thomas Aquinas, Ockham and others. The last three essays turn to the metaphysical problem of the nature of the principle of individuation. Moderate realists believe in the existence of immanent general natures such as humanity and equinity, whereby individuals are members of diverse natural kinds. Accordingly, moderate realists such as Aquinas, Henry of Ghent and Duns Scotus need to investigate the nature of the individuating principle by which members of one and the same natural kind differ from one another. Nominalists, for their part, need not concern themselves with any principle of individuation as, for them, all reality is individual, there being no immanent universals; but this release comes at the cost of a new set of epistemological problems. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5316","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5316,"authors_free":[{"id":6147,"entry_id":5316,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Gyula Klima","free_first_name":"Gyula","free_last_name":"Klima","norm_person":null},{"id":6148,"entry_id":5316,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Alexander W. Hall","free_first_name":"Alexander W.","free_last_name":"Hall","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Universal Representation, and the Ontology of Individuation","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Universal Representation, and the Ontology of Individuation"},"abstract":"There is broad agreement in the medieval tradition that we conceive things in the world owing to the transmission of intelligible content through various media that culminates in the concept by which something in the world is cognitively present for us. Yet how the intelligible content is transmitted along with the nature of the ultimate object of cognition provoked ceaseless debate. The first three essays in Universal Representation, and the Ontology of Individuation consider these issues as they play out in the metaphysics and natural philosophy of Avicenna, Averroes, Thomas Aquinas, Ockham and others. The last three essays turn to the metaphysical problem of the nature of the principle of individuation. Moderate realists believe in the existence of immanent general natures such as humanity and equinity, whereby individuals are members of diverse natural kinds. Accordingly, moderate realists such as Aquinas, Henry of Ghent and Duns Scotus need to investigate the nature of the individuating principle by which members of one and the same natural kind differ from one another. Nominalists, for their part, need not concern themselves with any principle of individuation as, for them, all reality is individual, there being no immanent universals; but this release comes at the cost of a new set of epistemological problems.","btype":4,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":3,"category_name":"Ockham","link":"bib?categories[]=Ockham"},{"id":63,"category_name":"Henry of Ghent","link":"bib?categories[]=Henry of Ghent"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5316,"pubplace":"Newcastle upon Tyne","publisher":"Cambridge Scholars Publishing","series":"Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics","volume":"5","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Quaestio |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 65-81 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Psychology, Metaphysics, Linguistics |
| Author(s) | Deborah L. Black |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| It has long been a truism of the history of philosophy that intentionality is an invention of the medieval period, and within this standard narrative, the central place of Arabic philosophy has always been acknowledged. Yet there are many misconceptions surrounding the theories of intentionality advanced by the two main Arabic thinkers whose works were available to the West, Avicenna and Averroes. In the first part of this paper I offer an overview of the general accounts of intentionality and intentional being found in the linguistic, psychological, and metaphysical writings of Avicenna and Averroes, and I trace the terminology of “intentions” to a neglected passage from Avicenna’s logic. In the second part of the paper I examine the way that Avicenna and Averroes apply their general theories of intentionality to the realm of sense perception. I offer an explanation of why Avicenna might have chosen to denominate the objects of the internal sense faculty of estimation as “intentions”, and I explore the implications of Averroes’s decision to attribute intentionality to the external senses and the media of perception. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5336","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5336,"authors_free":[{"id":6182,"entry_id":5336,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":950,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Deborah L. Black","free_first_name":"Deborah L.","free_last_name":"Black","norm_person":{"id":950,"first_name":"Deborah Louise","last_name":"Black","full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1061153703","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/12971847","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Deborah Louise Black"}}],"entry_title":"Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy"},"abstract":"It has long been a truism of the history of philosophy that intentionality is an invention of the medieval period, and within this standard narrative, the central place of Arabic philosophy has always been acknowledged. Yet there are many misconceptions surrounding the theories of intentionality advanced by the two main Arabic thinkers whose works were available to the West, Avicenna and Averroes. In the first part of this paper I offer an overview of the general accounts of intentionality and intentional being found in the linguistic, psychological, and metaphysical writings of Avicenna and Averroes, and I trace the terminology of \u201cintentions\u201d to a neglected passage from Avicenna\u2019s logic. In the second part of the paper I examine the way that Avicenna and Averroes apply their general theories of intentionality to the realm of sense perception. I offer an explanation of why Avicenna might have chosen to denominate the objects of the internal sense faculty of estimation as \u201cintentions\u201d, and I explore the implications of Averroes\u2019s decision to attribute intentionality to the external senses and the media of perception.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/J.QUAESTIO.1.102326","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"}],"authors":[{"id":950,"full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5336,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Quaestio","volume":" 10","issue":"","pages":"65-81"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | The Ontological Entailment of Averroes' Understanding of Perception |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2008 |
| Published in | Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy |
| Pages | 73–86 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Alfred L. Ivry |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1452","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1452,"authors_free":[{"id":1652,"entry_id":1452,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":653,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","free_first_name":"Alfred L.","free_last_name":"Ivry","norm_person":{"id":653,"first_name":"Alfred L.","last_name":"Ivry","full_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172513073","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/117886983","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd172513073.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alfred L. Ivry"}}],"entry_title":"The Ontological Entailment of Averroes' Understanding of Perception","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Ontological Entailment of Averroes' Understanding of Perception"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2008","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":653,"full_name":"Alfred L. Ivry","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1452,"section_of":199,"pages":"73\u201386","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":199,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2008","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2008","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":199,"pubplace":"New York","publisher":"Springer","series":"Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind","volume":"6","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Averroes on Psychology and the Principles of Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1998 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Philosophy |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 507–523 |
| Categories | Psychology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"798","_score":null,"_source":{"id":798,"authors_free":[{"id":961,"entry_id":798,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes on Psychology and the Principles of Metaphysics","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes on Psychology and the Principles of Metaphysics"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":798,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Philosophy","volume":"36","issue":"4","pages":"507\u2013523"}},"sort":[1998]}
| Title | Autour de Pomponazzi: Problématique de l'immortalité de l'ame en Italie au début du XVIe siècle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1961 |
| Journal | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age |
| Volume | 28 |
| Pages | 163-279 |
| Categories | Averroism, Metaphysics, Psychology, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Étienne Gilson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44403124 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5671","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5671,"authors_free":[{"id":6575,"entry_id":5671,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1873,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u00c9tienne Gilson","free_first_name":"\u00c9tienne ","free_last_name":"Gilson","norm_person":{"id":1873,"first_name":"Etienne ","last_name":"Gilson","full_name":"Etienne Gilson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118717480","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Etienne Gilson"}}],"entry_title":"Autour de Pomponazzi: Probl\u00e9matique de l'immortalit\u00e9 de l'ame en Italie au d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Autour de Pomponazzi: Probl\u00e9matique de l'immortalit\u00e9 de l'ame en Italie au d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1961","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44403124","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1873,"full_name":"Etienne Gilson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5671,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litt\u00e9raire du Moyen Age","volume":"28","issue":"","pages":"163-279"}},"sort":["Autour de Pomponazzi: Probl\u00e9matique de l'immortalit\u00e9 de l'ame en Italie au d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle"]}
| Title | Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect’s Causation of the Intelligible |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–60 |
| Categories | Thomas, Psychology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Therese Scarpelli Cory |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article examines two medieval thinkers – Averroes and Aquinas – on the kind of causation exercised by the agent intellect in 'abstracting' or producing intelligibles from images in the imagination. It argues that abstraction in these thinkers should be interpreted in causal terms, as an act whereby images in the imagination, through the power of the agent intellect, educe their intelligible likeness in a receptive intellect. This Averroean-Thomistic causal approach to abstraction offers an intriguing alternative to the usual approach to abstraction as an epistemological content-sorting. The article also demonstrates the extensive common ground uniting these thinkers’ cognition theories, despite Aquinas’s well-known rejection of Averroes’s theory of separate Intellects. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5277","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5277,"authors_free":[{"id":6093,"entry_id":5277,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1760,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","free_first_name":"Therese Scarpelli","free_last_name":"Cory","norm_person":{"id":1760,"first_name":"Therese Scarpelli","last_name":"Cory","full_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1050852745","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Therese Scarpelli Cory"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect\u2019s Causation of the Intelligible","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect\u2019s Causation of the Intelligible"},"abstract":"This article examines two medieval thinkers \u2013 Averroes and Aquinas \u2013 on the kind of causation exercised by the agent intellect in 'abstracting' or producing intelligibles from images in the imagination. It argues that abstraction in these thinkers should be interpreted in causal terms, as an act whereby images in the imagination, through the power of the agent intellect, educe their intelligible likeness in a receptive intellect. This Averroean-Thomistic causal approach to abstraction offers an intriguing alternative to the usual approach to abstraction as an epistemological content-sorting. The article also demonstrates the extensive common ground uniting these thinkers\u2019 cognition theories, despite Aquinas\u2019s well-known rejection of Averroes\u2019s theory of separate Intellects.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1760,"full_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5277,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de Th\u00e9ologie et Philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"82","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201360"}},"sort":["Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect\u2019s Causation of the Intelligible"]}
| Title | Averroes on Psychology and the Principles of Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1998 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Philosophy |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 507–523 |
| Categories | Psychology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"798","_score":null,"_source":{"id":798,"authors_free":[{"id":961,"entry_id":798,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes on Psychology and the Principles of Metaphysics","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes on Psychology and the Principles of Metaphysics"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":798,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Philosophy","volume":"36","issue":"4","pages":"507\u2013523"}},"sort":["Averroes on Psychology and the Principles of Metaphysics"]}
| Title | Averroes' Philosophical Conception of Separate Intellect and God |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Published in | La lumière de l'intellect. La pensée scientifique et philosophique d'Averroès dans son temps. Actes du IVe colloque international de la SIHSPAI (Société internationale d'histoire des sciences et de la philosophie arabes et islamiques). Cordoue, 9–12 décembre 1998 |
| Pages | 391–404 |
| Categories | Psychology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1518","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1518,"authors_free":[{"id":1744,"entry_id":1518,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes' Philosophical Conception of Separate Intellect and God","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes' Philosophical Conception of Separate Intellect and God"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1518,"section_of":211,"pages":"391\u2013404","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":211,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"La lumi\u00e8re de l'intellect. La pens\u00e9e scientifique et philosophique d'Averro\u00e8s dans son temps. Actes du IVe colloque international de la SIHSPAI (Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 internationale d'histoire des sciences et de la philosophie arabes et islamiques). Cordoue, 9\u201312 d\u00e9cembre 1998","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2011","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2011","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":211,"pubplace":"Leuven","publisher":"Peeters","series":"Ancient and Classical Sciences and Philosophy","volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Averroes' Philosophical Conception of Separate Intellect and God"]}
| Title | Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | History of Philosophy Quarterly |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 339-354 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Hamid Taieb |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5805","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5805,"authors_free":[{"id":6726,"entry_id":5805,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1902,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hamid Taieb","free_first_name":"Hamid ","free_last_name":"Taieb","norm_person":{"id":1902,"first_name":"Hamid ","last_name":"Taieb","full_name":"Hamid Taieb","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077921705","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Hamid Taieb"}}],"entry_title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis"},"abstract":"This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.5406\/21521026.39.4.03","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1902,"full_name":"Hamid Taieb","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5805,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"39","issue":"4","pages":"339-354"}},"sort":["Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd on Knowledge, Pleasures, and Analogy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Scienes in Muslim Contexts |
| Categories | Logic, Psychology, Metaphysics, Poetics, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://philosmus.org/en/archives/894 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5458","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5458,"authors_free":[{"id":6322,"entry_id":5458,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd on Knowledge, Pleasures, and Analogy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd on Knowledge, Pleasures, and Analogy"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/philosmus.org\/en\/archives\/894","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5458,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy and Scienes in Muslim Contexts","volume":"","issue":"","pages":""}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd on Knowledge, Pleasures, and Analogy"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Hafīd (Averroes) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Published in | Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500 |
| Pages | 494–501 |
| Categories | Biography, Surveys, Logic, Psychology, Cosmology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Taneli Kukkonen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes (1126–1198 CE) was the most famous and prolific commentator on Aristotle in all of medieval philosophy: 38 works are extant, at all levels of instruction. This concentration on Aristotle was not happenstance, instead, it reflects Averroes’ maturing philosophical outlook. For Averroes, Aristotle’s teaching came to represent the pinnacle of philosophical wisdom, and answers to all the most pressing problems in philosophy were to be found in a thorough and careful exploration of what that teaching truly implied. In the course of Averroes’ deepening investigations into Aristotelian lore, alternative interpretations were advanced and different traditions of thinking carefully laid side by side, producing a field guide to the Peripatetic tradition, as it was known to an Arabic scholar of the classical period. The resulting body of texts represents a high watermark in Aristotelian synthesis and systematization, even if Averroes failed in the end to resolve satisfactorily all the problems that had accumulated over the centuries. In addition to his Aristotelian Commentaries, Explications, and Compendia (which, besides Aristotle, encompassed works by Plato, Galen, Ptolemy, and al-Ġazālī), Averroes wrote smaller, independent essays and questions that explored contested issues in Aristotelian teaching; polemical works that argued the religious innocence and intellectual respectability of Peripatetic philosophy, correctly understood; and medical and legal treatises of solid but unspectacular standing. Averroes’ reputation was made in Latin Scholasticism and in Jewish circles of learning, while in the Arabic world his works fell mostly by the wayside. Today, his name is evoked in the Arabic world as a rallying-point for a rationalist Islam – a fitting legacy, if not always especially well grounded (modern-day Averroists displaying at best a cursory knowledge of the Commentator’s philosophy). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1781","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1781,"authors_free":[{"id":2054,"entry_id":1781,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":828,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","free_first_name":"Taneli","free_last_name":"Kukkonen","norm_person":{"id":828,"first_name":"Taneli","last_name":"Kukkonen","full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1064756859","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/242146822498007382889","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Taneli Kukkonen"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)"},"abstract":"Averroes (1126\u20131198 CE) was the most famous and prolific commentator on Aristotle in all of medieval philosophy: 38 works are extant, at all levels of instruction. This concentration on Aristotle was not happenstance, instead, it reflects Averroes\u2019 maturing philosophical outlook. For Averroes, Aristotle\u2019s teaching came to represent the pinnacle of philosophical wisdom, and answers to all the most pressing problems in philosophy were to be found in a thorough and careful exploration of what that teaching truly implied. In the course of Averroes\u2019 deepening investigations into Aristotelian lore, alternative interpretations were advanced and different traditions of thinking carefully laid side by side, producing a field guide to the Peripatetic tradition, as it was known to an Arabic scholar of the classical period. The resulting body of texts represents a high watermark in Aristotelian synthesis and systematization, even if Averroes failed in the end to resolve satisfactorily all the problems that had accumulated over the centuries.\r\n\r\nIn addition to his Aristotelian Commentaries, Explications, and Compendia (which, besides Aristotle, encompassed works by Plato, Galen, Ptolemy, and al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b), Averroes wrote smaller, independent essays and questions that explored contested issues in Aristotelian teaching; polemical works that argued the religious innocence and intellectual respectability of Peripatetic philosophy, correctly understood; and medical and legal treatises of solid but unspectacular standing. Averroes\u2019 reputation was made in Latin Scholasticism and in Jewish circles of learning, while in the Arabic world his works fell mostly by the wayside. Today, his name is evoked in the Arabic world as a rallying-point for a rationalist Islam \u2013 a fitting legacy, if not always especially well grounded (modern-day Averroists displaying at best a cursory knowledge of the Commentator\u2019s philosophy).","btype":2,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":13,"category_name":"Biography","link":"bib?categories[]=Biography"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":828,"full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1781,"section_of":247,"pages":"494\u2013501","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":247,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2011","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2011","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":247,"pubplace":"Dordrecht","publisher":"Springer","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":376,"entry_id":247,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1317,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","free_first_name":"Henrik","free_last_name":"Lagerlund","norm_person":{"id":1317,"first_name":"Henrik","last_name":"Lagerlund","full_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133619168","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/35317572","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd133619168.html","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)"]}
| Title | Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Quaestio |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 65-81 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Psychology, Metaphysics, Linguistics |
| Author(s) | Deborah L. Black |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| It has long been a truism of the history of philosophy that intentionality is an invention of the medieval period, and within this standard narrative, the central place of Arabic philosophy has always been acknowledged. Yet there are many misconceptions surrounding the theories of intentionality advanced by the two main Arabic thinkers whose works were available to the West, Avicenna and Averroes. In the first part of this paper I offer an overview of the general accounts of intentionality and intentional being found in the linguistic, psychological, and metaphysical writings of Avicenna and Averroes, and I trace the terminology of “intentions” to a neglected passage from Avicenna’s logic. In the second part of the paper I examine the way that Avicenna and Averroes apply their general theories of intentionality to the realm of sense perception. I offer an explanation of why Avicenna might have chosen to denominate the objects of the internal sense faculty of estimation as “intentions”, and I explore the implications of Averroes’s decision to attribute intentionality to the external senses and the media of perception. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5336","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5336,"authors_free":[{"id":6182,"entry_id":5336,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":950,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Deborah L. Black","free_first_name":"Deborah L.","free_last_name":"Black","norm_person":{"id":950,"first_name":"Deborah Louise","last_name":"Black","full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1061153703","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/12971847","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Deborah Louise Black"}}],"entry_title":"Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy"},"abstract":"It has long been a truism of the history of philosophy that intentionality is an invention of the medieval period, and within this standard narrative, the central place of Arabic philosophy has always been acknowledged. Yet there are many misconceptions surrounding the theories of intentionality advanced by the two main Arabic thinkers whose works were available to the West, Avicenna and Averroes. In the first part of this paper I offer an overview of the general accounts of intentionality and intentional being found in the linguistic, psychological, and metaphysical writings of Avicenna and Averroes, and I trace the terminology of \u201cintentions\u201d to a neglected passage from Avicenna\u2019s logic. In the second part of the paper I examine the way that Avicenna and Averroes apply their general theories of intentionality to the realm of sense perception. I offer an explanation of why Avicenna might have chosen to denominate the objects of the internal sense faculty of estimation as \u201cintentions\u201d, and I explore the implications of Averroes\u2019s decision to attribute intentionality to the external senses and the media of perception.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/J.QUAESTIO.1.102326","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"}],"authors":[{"id":950,"full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5336,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Quaestio","volume":" 10","issue":"","pages":"65-81"}},"sort":["Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy"]}
| Title | Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Publication Place | Cambridge |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Categories | Logic, Natural Philosophy, Psychology, Metaphysics, Law, Medicine, Ethics |
| Author(s) | Peter Adamson , Matteo Di Giovanni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"4977","_score":null,"_source":{"id":4977,"authors_free":[{"id":5710,"entry_id":4977,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}},{"id":5711,"entry_id":4977,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":734,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Matteo Di Giovanni","free_first_name":"Matteo","free_last_name":"Di Giovanni","norm_person":{"id":734,"first_name":"Matteo","last_name":"Di Giovanni","full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1130687570","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/9497149368819485980007","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Matteo di Giovanni"}}],"entry_title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":2},{"id":734,"full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":4977,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays"]}
| Title | Onstoffelijkheid en kenactiviteit bij Thomas van Aquino |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Dutch |
| Date | 1956 |
| Journal | Tijdschrift voor Philosophie |
| Volume | 18de Jaarg. |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 625-658 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Psychology, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | L. J. van der Linden |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40880188 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5659","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5659,"authors_free":[{"id":6564,"entry_id":5659,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"L. J. van der Linden","free_first_name":"L. J. van der ","free_last_name":"Linden","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Onstoffelijkheid en kenactiviteit bij Thomas van Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Onstoffelijkheid en kenactiviteit bij Thomas van Aquino"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1956","language":"Dutch","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/40880188","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5659,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Tijdschrift voor Philosophie","volume":"18de Jaarg.","issue":"4","pages":"625-658"}},"sort":["Onstoffelijkheid en kenactiviteit bij Thomas van Aquino"]}