| Title | Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 93–103 |
| Categories | Renaissance, Tradition and Reception, Psychology, Ethics |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Les spécialistes ont longtemps accusé Pietro Pomponazzi d’utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour échapper à la censure de l’Église au sujet de ses thèses sur la mortalité de l’âme et le fondement matériel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus témoigne non pas d’une promotion de la duperie mais plutôt d’une cohérence entre sa compréhension de l’utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compréhension de l’entendement humain, de l’âme et de la nature de la moralité. Ces thèses dépendent en partie de sa lecture d’Averroès. En particulier, il était d’avis que l’écriture n’était porteuse ni de vérité ni de fausseté au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s’écarta d’Averroès parce que son rejet de la psychologie était mêlé d’une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu’il considérait comme étant éloignée de l’intellection et incapable d’obtenir la vérité. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/544 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5054","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5054,"authors_free":[{"id":5804,"entry_id":5054,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture"},"abstract":"Les sp\u00e9cialistes ont longtemps accus\u00e9 Pietro Pomponazzi d\u2019utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour \u00e9chapper \u00e0 la censure de l\u2019\u00c9glise au sujet de ses th\u00e8ses sur la mortalit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e2me et le fondement mat\u00e9riel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus t\u00e9moigne non pas d\u2019une promotion de la duperie mais plut\u00f4t d\u2019une coh\u00e9rence entre sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019entendement humain, de l\u2019\u00e2me et de la nature de la moralit\u00e9. Ces th\u00e8ses d\u00e9pendent en partie de sa lecture d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. En particulier, il \u00e9tait d\u2019avis que l\u2019\u00e9criture n\u2019\u00e9tait porteuse ni de v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ni de fausset\u00e9 au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s\u2019\u00e9carta d\u2019Averro\u00e8s parce que son rejet de la psychologie \u00e9tait m\u00eal\u00e9 d\u2019une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu\u2019il consid\u00e9rait comme \u00e9tant \u00e9loign\u00e9e de l\u2019intellection et incapable d\u2019obtenir la v\u00e9rit\u00e9.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/544","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5054,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"93\u2013103"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Phantasms of Reason and Shadows of Matter: Averroes’s Notion of the Imagination and Its Renaissance Interpreters |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe |
| Pages | 173–196 |
| Categories | Averroism, Renaissance, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Guido Giglioni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Averroes’s view of the cosmos, living beings discern, animals imagine, individual human beings cogitate, humankind as a whole thinks, and intellects intuit and understand themselves. In other words, natural operations in living organisms are capable of discriminating between the useful and the harmful, animal nature processes images (intentions is Averroes’s term) from matter, individual men cogitate those images and the human intellect thinks insofar as it is considered a species, i.e., the human species. In this sense, the intellect of the human species thinks the sublunary world as one collective representation of the universe to be further abstracted and processed by higher levels of intellectual activity. A number of Renaissance philosophers, depending on how they interpreted the special relationship between intellects, the material intellect and bodily imaginations, elaborated a series of fascinating solutions in response to Averroes’s challenging view. This chapter focuses on the notion of the imagination – and dream imagination in particular – and intends to demonstrate the important role played by this faculty in unravelling some of the most notorious puzzles of Averroes’s philosophy. As will become clear over the course of this chapter, this role needs to be explored in all its various dimensions (metaphysical, epistemological, cosmological, medical and theologico-political). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1748","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1748,"authors_free":[{"id":2015,"entry_id":1748,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1479,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Guido Giglioni","free_first_name":"Guido","free_last_name":"Giglioni","norm_person":{"id":1479,"first_name":"Guido","last_name":"Giglioni","full_name":"Guido Giglioni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1060847221","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51822941","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Guido Giglioni"}}],"entry_title":"Phantasms of Reason and Shadows of Matter: Averroes\u2019s Notion of the Imagination and Its Renaissance Interpreters","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Phantasms of Reason and Shadows of Matter: Averroes\u2019s Notion of the Imagination and Its Renaissance Interpreters"},"abstract":"In Averroes\u2019s view of the cosmos, living beings discern, animals imagine, individual human beings cogitate, humankind as a whole thinks, and intellects intuit and understand themselves. In other words, natural operations in living organisms are capable of discriminating between the useful and the harmful, animal nature processes images (intentions is Averroes\u2019s term) from matter, individual men cogitate those images and the human intellect thinks insofar as it is considered a species, i.e., the human species. In this sense, the intellect of the human species thinks the sublunary world as one collective representation of the universe to be further abstracted and processed by higher levels of intellectual activity. A number of Renaissance philosophers, depending on how they interpreted the special relationship between intellects, the material intellect and bodily imaginations, elaborated a series of fascinating solutions in response to Averroes\u2019s challenging view. This chapter focuses on the notion of the imagination \u2013 and dream imagination in particular \u2013 and intends to demonstrate the important role played by this faculty in unravelling some of the most notorious puzzles of Averroes\u2019s philosophy. As will become clear over the course of this chapter, this role needs to be explored in all its various dimensions (metaphysical, epistemological, cosmological, medical and theologico-political).","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5240-5_9","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1479,"full_name":"Guido Giglioni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1748,"section_of":241,"pages":"173\u2013196","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":241,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":241,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Springer","series":"International Archives of the History of Ideas","volume":"211","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Phantasms of Reason and Shadows of Matter: Averroes’s Notion of the Imagination and Its Renaissance Interpreters |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe |
| Pages | 173–196 |
| Categories | Averroism, Renaissance, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Guido Giglioni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Averroes’s view of the cosmos, living beings discern, animals imagine, individual human beings cogitate, humankind as a whole thinks, and intellects intuit and understand themselves. In other words, natural operations in living organisms are capable of discriminating between the useful and the harmful, animal nature processes images (intentions is Averroes’s term) from matter, individual men cogitate those images and the human intellect thinks insofar as it is considered a species, i.e., the human species. In this sense, the intellect of the human species thinks the sublunary world as one collective representation of the universe to be further abstracted and processed by higher levels of intellectual activity. A number of Renaissance philosophers, depending on how they interpreted the special relationship between intellects, the material intellect and bodily imaginations, elaborated a series of fascinating solutions in response to Averroes’s challenging view. This chapter focuses on the notion of the imagination – and dream imagination in particular – and intends to demonstrate the important role played by this faculty in unravelling some of the most notorious puzzles of Averroes’s philosophy. As will become clear over the course of this chapter, this role needs to be explored in all its various dimensions (metaphysical, epistemological, cosmological, medical and theologico-political). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1748","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1748,"authors_free":[{"id":2015,"entry_id":1748,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1479,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Guido Giglioni","free_first_name":"Guido","free_last_name":"Giglioni","norm_person":{"id":1479,"first_name":"Guido","last_name":"Giglioni","full_name":"Guido Giglioni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1060847221","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51822941","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Guido Giglioni"}}],"entry_title":"Phantasms of Reason and Shadows of Matter: Averroes\u2019s Notion of the Imagination and Its Renaissance Interpreters","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Phantasms of Reason and Shadows of Matter: Averroes\u2019s Notion of the Imagination and Its Renaissance Interpreters"},"abstract":"In Averroes\u2019s view of the cosmos, living beings discern, animals imagine, individual human beings cogitate, humankind as a whole thinks, and intellects intuit and understand themselves. In other words, natural operations in living organisms are capable of discriminating between the useful and the harmful, animal nature processes images (intentions is Averroes\u2019s term) from matter, individual men cogitate those images and the human intellect thinks insofar as it is considered a species, i.e., the human species. In this sense, the intellect of the human species thinks the sublunary world as one collective representation of the universe to be further abstracted and processed by higher levels of intellectual activity. A number of Renaissance philosophers, depending on how they interpreted the special relationship between intellects, the material intellect and bodily imaginations, elaborated a series of fascinating solutions in response to Averroes\u2019s challenging view. This chapter focuses on the notion of the imagination \u2013 and dream imagination in particular \u2013 and intends to demonstrate the important role played by this faculty in unravelling some of the most notorious puzzles of Averroes\u2019s philosophy. As will become clear over the course of this chapter, this role needs to be explored in all its various dimensions (metaphysical, epistemological, cosmological, medical and theologico-political).","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5240-5_9","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1479,"full_name":"Guido Giglioni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1748,"section_of":241,"pages":"173\u2013196","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":241,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":241,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Springer","series":"International Archives of the History of Ideas","volume":"211","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Phantasms of Reason and Shadows of Matter: Averroes\u2019s Notion of the Imagination and Its Renaissance Interpreters"]}
| Title | Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 93–103 |
| Categories | Renaissance, Tradition and Reception, Psychology, Ethics |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Les spécialistes ont longtemps accusé Pietro Pomponazzi d’utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour échapper à la censure de l’Église au sujet de ses thèses sur la mortalité de l’âme et le fondement matériel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus témoigne non pas d’une promotion de la duperie mais plutôt d’une cohérence entre sa compréhension de l’utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compréhension de l’entendement humain, de l’âme et de la nature de la moralité. Ces thèses dépendent en partie de sa lecture d’Averroès. En particulier, il était d’avis que l’écriture n’était porteuse ni de vérité ni de fausseté au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s’écarta d’Averroès parce que son rejet de la psychologie était mêlé d’une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu’il considérait comme étant éloignée de l’intellection et incapable d’obtenir la vérité. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/544 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5054","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5054,"authors_free":[{"id":5804,"entry_id":5054,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture"},"abstract":"Les sp\u00e9cialistes ont longtemps accus\u00e9 Pietro Pomponazzi d\u2019utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour \u00e9chapper \u00e0 la censure de l\u2019\u00c9glise au sujet de ses th\u00e8ses sur la mortalit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e2me et le fondement mat\u00e9riel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus t\u00e9moigne non pas d\u2019une promotion de la duperie mais plut\u00f4t d\u2019une coh\u00e9rence entre sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019entendement humain, de l\u2019\u00e2me et de la nature de la moralit\u00e9. Ces th\u00e8ses d\u00e9pendent en partie de sa lecture d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. En particulier, il \u00e9tait d\u2019avis que l\u2019\u00e9criture n\u2019\u00e9tait porteuse ni de v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ni de fausset\u00e9 au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s\u2019\u00e9carta d\u2019Averro\u00e8s parce que son rejet de la psychologie \u00e9tait m\u00eal\u00e9 d\u2019une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu\u2019il consid\u00e9rait comme \u00e9tant \u00e9loign\u00e9e de l\u2019intellection et incapable d\u2019obtenir la v\u00e9rit\u00e9.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/544","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5054,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"93\u2013103"}},"sort":["Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture"]}