| Title | Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2020 |
| Publication Place | Cambridge |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Theology, Surveys |
| Author(s) | Özgür Koca |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this volume, Ozgur Koca offers a comprehensive survey of Islamic accounts of causality and freedom from the medieval to the modern era, as well as contemporary relevance. His book is an invitation for Muslims and non-Muslims to explore a rich, but largely forgotten, aspect of Islamic intellectual history. Here, he examines how key Muslim thinkers, such as Ibn Sina, Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Ibn Arabi, Suhrawardi, Jurjani, Mulla Sadra and Nursi, among others, conceptualized freedom in the created order as an extension of their perception of causality. Based on this examination, Koca identifies and explores some of the major currents in the debate on causality and freedom. He also discusses the possible implications of Muslim perspectives on causality for contemporary debates over religion and science. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5394","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5394,"authors_free":[{"id":6252,"entry_id":5394,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","free_first_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr","free_last_name":"Koca","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era"},"abstract":"In this volume, Ozgur Koca offers a comprehensive survey of Islamic accounts of causality and freedom from the medieval to the modern era, as well as contemporary relevance. His book is an invitation for Muslims and non-Muslims to explore a rich, but largely forgotten, aspect of Islamic intellectual history. Here, he examines how key Muslim thinkers, such as Ibn Sina, Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Ibn Arabi, Suhrawardi, Jurjani, Mulla Sadra and Nursi, among others, conceptualized freedom in the created order as an extension of their perception of causality. Based on this examination, Koca identifies and explores some of the major currents in the debate on causality and freedom. He also discusses the possible implications of Muslim perspectives on causality for contemporary debates over religion and science.","btype":1,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781108866965","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5394,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2020]}
| Title | On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Publication Place | Edinburgh |
| Publisher | Edinburgh University Press |
| Series | Encounters in Law & Philosophy: ELP |
| Categories | Law, Surveys, Metaphysics, Politics |
| Author(s) | Emanuele Castrucci |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| A critique of the metaphysical concept of power and potency in the history of Western jurisprudence Sweeping through the history of Western philosophy of law, Emanuele Castrucci deals with the metaphysical idea of potency as defined by Spinoza and Nietzsche, upsetting entrenched theories of jurisprudence. Castrucci first addresses how the idea of potency can change the meaning of the power ascribed to an omnipotent God. This brings together classical Greek philosophy with Jewish biblical exegesis, which Castrucci links through the juncture of Christianity. He then relates potency to the classical philosophical tradition in Aristotle's Metaphysics and its Arabic interpretations, particularly Ibn Rushd's (Averroës). This leads us to the genesis of natural law theory in Western philosophy, from Augustine to Aquinas and from Duns Scotus to Ockham. Moving on, Castrucci examines the inherently problematic concept of political theology, pitting Spinozan–Nietzschean potency against Kant and Enlightenment natural law to reveal the weaknesses inherent in the Enlightenment system. Finally, Castrucci applies the theories of Carl Schmitt to the philosophical rationalism of the Western tradition, showing us how it has failed to contain absolute power in a juridical sense. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5409","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5409,"authors_free":[{"id":6270,"entry_id":5409,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Emanuele Castrucci","free_first_name":"Emanuele","free_last_name":"Castrucci","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition"},"abstract":"A critique of the metaphysical concept of power and potency in the history of Western jurisprudence\r\n\r\nSweeping through the history of Western philosophy of law, Emanuele Castrucci deals with the metaphysical idea of potency as defined by Spinoza and Nietzsche, upsetting entrenched theories of jurisprudence.\r\n\r\nCastrucci first addresses how the idea of potency can change the meaning of the power ascribed to an omnipotent God. This brings together classical Greek philosophy with Jewish biblical exegesis, which Castrucci links through the juncture of Christianity. He then relates potency to the classical philosophical tradition in Aristotle's Metaphysics and its Arabic interpretations, particularly Ibn Rushd's (Averro\u00ebs). This leads us to the genesis of natural law theory in Western philosophy, from Augustine to Aquinas and from Duns Scotus to Ockham.\r\n\r\nMoving on, Castrucci examines the inherently problematic concept of political theology, pitting Spinozan\u2013Nietzschean potency against Kant and Enlightenment natural law to reveal the weaknesses inherent in the Enlightenment system. Finally, Castrucci applies the theories of Carl Schmitt to the philosophical rationalism of the Western tradition, showing us how it has failed to contain absolute power in a juridical sense.","btype":1,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781474411868","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5409,"pubplace":"Edinburgh ","publisher":"Edinburgh University Press","series":" Encounters in Law & Philosophy: ELP","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2016]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Hafīd (Averroes) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Published in | Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500 |
| Pages | 494–501 |
| Categories | Biography, Surveys, Logic, Psychology, Cosmology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Taneli Kukkonen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes (1126–1198 CE) was the most famous and prolific commentator on Aristotle in all of medieval philosophy: 38 works are extant, at all levels of instruction. This concentration on Aristotle was not happenstance, instead, it reflects Averroes’ maturing philosophical outlook. For Averroes, Aristotle’s teaching came to represent the pinnacle of philosophical wisdom, and answers to all the most pressing problems in philosophy were to be found in a thorough and careful exploration of what that teaching truly implied. In the course of Averroes’ deepening investigations into Aristotelian lore, alternative interpretations were advanced and different traditions of thinking carefully laid side by side, producing a field guide to the Peripatetic tradition, as it was known to an Arabic scholar of the classical period. The resulting body of texts represents a high watermark in Aristotelian synthesis and systematization, even if Averroes failed in the end to resolve satisfactorily all the problems that had accumulated over the centuries. In addition to his Aristotelian Commentaries, Explications, and Compendia (which, besides Aristotle, encompassed works by Plato, Galen, Ptolemy, and al-Ġazālī), Averroes wrote smaller, independent essays and questions that explored contested issues in Aristotelian teaching; polemical works that argued the religious innocence and intellectual respectability of Peripatetic philosophy, correctly understood; and medical and legal treatises of solid but unspectacular standing. Averroes’ reputation was made in Latin Scholasticism and in Jewish circles of learning, while in the Arabic world his works fell mostly by the wayside. Today, his name is evoked in the Arabic world as a rallying-point for a rationalist Islam – a fitting legacy, if not always especially well grounded (modern-day Averroists displaying at best a cursory knowledge of the Commentator’s philosophy). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1781","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1781,"authors_free":[{"id":2054,"entry_id":1781,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":828,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","free_first_name":"Taneli","free_last_name":"Kukkonen","norm_person":{"id":828,"first_name":"Taneli","last_name":"Kukkonen","full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1064756859","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/242146822498007382889","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Taneli Kukkonen"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)"},"abstract":"Averroes (1126\u20131198 CE) was the most famous and prolific commentator on Aristotle in all of medieval philosophy: 38 works are extant, at all levels of instruction. This concentration on Aristotle was not happenstance, instead, it reflects Averroes\u2019 maturing philosophical outlook. For Averroes, Aristotle\u2019s teaching came to represent the pinnacle of philosophical wisdom, and answers to all the most pressing problems in philosophy were to be found in a thorough and careful exploration of what that teaching truly implied. In the course of Averroes\u2019 deepening investigations into Aristotelian lore, alternative interpretations were advanced and different traditions of thinking carefully laid side by side, producing a field guide to the Peripatetic tradition, as it was known to an Arabic scholar of the classical period. The resulting body of texts represents a high watermark in Aristotelian synthesis and systematization, even if Averroes failed in the end to resolve satisfactorily all the problems that had accumulated over the centuries.\r\n\r\nIn addition to his Aristotelian Commentaries, Explications, and Compendia (which, besides Aristotle, encompassed works by Plato, Galen, Ptolemy, and al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b), Averroes wrote smaller, independent essays and questions that explored contested issues in Aristotelian teaching; polemical works that argued the religious innocence and intellectual respectability of Peripatetic philosophy, correctly understood; and medical and legal treatises of solid but unspectacular standing. Averroes\u2019 reputation was made in Latin Scholasticism and in Jewish circles of learning, while in the Arabic world his works fell mostly by the wayside. Today, his name is evoked in the Arabic world as a rallying-point for a rationalist Islam \u2013 a fitting legacy, if not always especially well grounded (modern-day Averroists displaying at best a cursory knowledge of the Commentator\u2019s philosophy).","btype":2,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":13,"category_name":"Biography","link":"bib?categories[]=Biography"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":828,"full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1781,"section_of":247,"pages":"494\u2013501","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":247,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2011","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2011","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":247,"pubplace":"Dordrecht","publisher":"Springer","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":376,"entry_id":247,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1317,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","free_first_name":"Henrik","free_last_name":"Lagerlund","norm_person":{"id":1317,"first_name":"Henrik","last_name":"Lagerlund","full_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133619168","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/35317572","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd133619168.html","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Arguments from the Concept of Particularization in Arabic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1968 |
| Journal | Philosophy East and West |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 299-314 |
| Categories | Surveys, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Herbert A. Davidson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/1398407 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2307/1398407 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5687","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5687,"authors_free":[{"id":6592,"entry_id":5687,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":249,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Herbert A. Davidson","free_first_name":"Herbert A. ","free_last_name":"Davidson","norm_person":{"id":249,"first_name":"Herbert","last_name":"Davidson","full_name":"Herbert Davidson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15814743X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Herbert Davidson"}}],"entry_title":"Arguments from the Concept of Particularization in Arabic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Arguments from the Concept of Particularization in Arabic Philosophy"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1968","language":null,"online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/1398407","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1398407","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":249,"full_name":"Herbert Davidson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5687,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy East and West","volume":"18","issue":"4","pages":"299-314"}},"sort":[1968]}
| Title | Being' in Linguistics and Philosophy: A Preliminary Inquiry |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Foundations of Language |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 223-231 |
| Categories | Surveys, Linguistics, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | A. C. Graham |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/25000177 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5681","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5681,"authors_free":[{"id":6585,"entry_id":5681,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"A. C. Graham","free_first_name":"A. C. ","free_last_name":"Graham","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Being' in Linguistics and Philosophy: A Preliminary Inquiry","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Being' in Linguistics and Philosophy: A Preliminary Inquiry"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/25000177","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5681,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Foundations of Language","volume":"1","issue":"3","pages":"223-231"}},"sort":[1965]}
| Title | Arguments from the Concept of Particularization in Arabic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1968 |
| Journal | Philosophy East and West |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 299-314 |
| Categories | Surveys, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Herbert A. Davidson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/1398407 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2307/1398407 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5687","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5687,"authors_free":[{"id":6592,"entry_id":5687,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":249,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Herbert A. Davidson","free_first_name":"Herbert A. ","free_last_name":"Davidson","norm_person":{"id":249,"first_name":"Herbert","last_name":"Davidson","full_name":"Herbert Davidson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15814743X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Herbert Davidson"}}],"entry_title":"Arguments from the Concept of Particularization in Arabic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Arguments from the Concept of Particularization in Arabic Philosophy"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1968","language":null,"online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/1398407","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1398407","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":249,"full_name":"Herbert Davidson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5687,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy East and West","volume":"18","issue":"4","pages":"299-314"}},"sort":["Arguments from the Concept of Particularization in Arabic Philosophy"]}
| Title | Being' in Linguistics and Philosophy: A Preliminary Inquiry |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1965 |
| Journal | Foundations of Language |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 223-231 |
| Categories | Surveys, Linguistics, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | A. C. Graham |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/25000177 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5681","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5681,"authors_free":[{"id":6585,"entry_id":5681,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"A. C. Graham","free_first_name":"A. C. ","free_last_name":"Graham","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Being' in Linguistics and Philosophy: A Preliminary Inquiry","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Being' in Linguistics and Philosophy: A Preliminary Inquiry"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1965","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/25000177","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5681,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Foundations of Language","volume":"1","issue":"3","pages":"223-231"}},"sort":["Being' in Linguistics and Philosophy: A Preliminary Inquiry"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Hafīd (Averroes) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Published in | Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500 |
| Pages | 494–501 |
| Categories | Biography, Surveys, Logic, Psychology, Cosmology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Taneli Kukkonen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes (1126–1198 CE) was the most famous and prolific commentator on Aristotle in all of medieval philosophy: 38 works are extant, at all levels of instruction. This concentration on Aristotle was not happenstance, instead, it reflects Averroes’ maturing philosophical outlook. For Averroes, Aristotle’s teaching came to represent the pinnacle of philosophical wisdom, and answers to all the most pressing problems in philosophy were to be found in a thorough and careful exploration of what that teaching truly implied. In the course of Averroes’ deepening investigations into Aristotelian lore, alternative interpretations were advanced and different traditions of thinking carefully laid side by side, producing a field guide to the Peripatetic tradition, as it was known to an Arabic scholar of the classical period. The resulting body of texts represents a high watermark in Aristotelian synthesis and systematization, even if Averroes failed in the end to resolve satisfactorily all the problems that had accumulated over the centuries. In addition to his Aristotelian Commentaries, Explications, and Compendia (which, besides Aristotle, encompassed works by Plato, Galen, Ptolemy, and al-Ġazālī), Averroes wrote smaller, independent essays and questions that explored contested issues in Aristotelian teaching; polemical works that argued the religious innocence and intellectual respectability of Peripatetic philosophy, correctly understood; and medical and legal treatises of solid but unspectacular standing. Averroes’ reputation was made in Latin Scholasticism and in Jewish circles of learning, while in the Arabic world his works fell mostly by the wayside. Today, his name is evoked in the Arabic world as a rallying-point for a rationalist Islam – a fitting legacy, if not always especially well grounded (modern-day Averroists displaying at best a cursory knowledge of the Commentator’s philosophy). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1781","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1781,"authors_free":[{"id":2054,"entry_id":1781,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":828,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","free_first_name":"Taneli","free_last_name":"Kukkonen","norm_person":{"id":828,"first_name":"Taneli","last_name":"Kukkonen","full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1064756859","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/242146822498007382889","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Taneli Kukkonen"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)"},"abstract":"Averroes (1126\u20131198 CE) was the most famous and prolific commentator on Aristotle in all of medieval philosophy: 38 works are extant, at all levels of instruction. This concentration on Aristotle was not happenstance, instead, it reflects Averroes\u2019 maturing philosophical outlook. For Averroes, Aristotle\u2019s teaching came to represent the pinnacle of philosophical wisdom, and answers to all the most pressing problems in philosophy were to be found in a thorough and careful exploration of what that teaching truly implied. In the course of Averroes\u2019 deepening investigations into Aristotelian lore, alternative interpretations were advanced and different traditions of thinking carefully laid side by side, producing a field guide to the Peripatetic tradition, as it was known to an Arabic scholar of the classical period. The resulting body of texts represents a high watermark in Aristotelian synthesis and systematization, even if Averroes failed in the end to resolve satisfactorily all the problems that had accumulated over the centuries.\r\n\r\nIn addition to his Aristotelian Commentaries, Explications, and Compendia (which, besides Aristotle, encompassed works by Plato, Galen, Ptolemy, and al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b), Averroes wrote smaller, independent essays and questions that explored contested issues in Aristotelian teaching; polemical works that argued the religious innocence and intellectual respectability of Peripatetic philosophy, correctly understood; and medical and legal treatises of solid but unspectacular standing. Averroes\u2019 reputation was made in Latin Scholasticism and in Jewish circles of learning, while in the Arabic world his works fell mostly by the wayside. Today, his name is evoked in the Arabic world as a rallying-point for a rationalist Islam \u2013 a fitting legacy, if not always especially well grounded (modern-day Averroists displaying at best a cursory knowledge of the Commentator\u2019s philosophy).","btype":2,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":13,"category_name":"Biography","link":"bib?categories[]=Biography"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":828,"full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1781,"section_of":247,"pages":"494\u2013501","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":247,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Philosophy between 500 and 1500","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2011","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2011","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":247,"pubplace":"Dordrecht","publisher":"Springer","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":376,"entry_id":247,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1317,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","free_first_name":"Henrik","free_last_name":"Lagerlund","norm_person":{"id":1317,"first_name":"Henrik","last_name":"Lagerlund","full_name":"Henrik Lagerlund","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133619168","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/35317572","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd133619168.html","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Ibn Rushd, Muhammad ibn Ahmad al-Haf\u012bd (Averroes)"]}
| Title | Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2020 |
| Publication Place | Cambridge |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Theology, Surveys |
| Author(s) | Özgür Koca |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this volume, Ozgur Koca offers a comprehensive survey of Islamic accounts of causality and freedom from the medieval to the modern era, as well as contemporary relevance. His book is an invitation for Muslims and non-Muslims to explore a rich, but largely forgotten, aspect of Islamic intellectual history. Here, he examines how key Muslim thinkers, such as Ibn Sina, Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Ibn Arabi, Suhrawardi, Jurjani, Mulla Sadra and Nursi, among others, conceptualized freedom in the created order as an extension of their perception of causality. Based on this examination, Koca identifies and explores some of the major currents in the debate on causality and freedom. He also discusses the possible implications of Muslim perspectives on causality for contemporary debates over religion and science. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5394","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5394,"authors_free":[{"id":6252,"entry_id":5394,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","free_first_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr","free_last_name":"Koca","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era"},"abstract":"In this volume, Ozgur Koca offers a comprehensive survey of Islamic accounts of causality and freedom from the medieval to the modern era, as well as contemporary relevance. His book is an invitation for Muslims and non-Muslims to explore a rich, but largely forgotten, aspect of Islamic intellectual history. Here, he examines how key Muslim thinkers, such as Ibn Sina, Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Ibn Arabi, Suhrawardi, Jurjani, Mulla Sadra and Nursi, among others, conceptualized freedom in the created order as an extension of their perception of causality. Based on this examination, Koca identifies and explores some of the major currents in the debate on causality and freedom. He also discusses the possible implications of Muslim perspectives on causality for contemporary debates over religion and science.","btype":1,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781108866965","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5394,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era"]}
| Title | On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Publication Place | Edinburgh |
| Publisher | Edinburgh University Press |
| Series | Encounters in Law & Philosophy: ELP |
| Categories | Law, Surveys, Metaphysics, Politics |
| Author(s) | Emanuele Castrucci |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| A critique of the metaphysical concept of power and potency in the history of Western jurisprudence Sweeping through the history of Western philosophy of law, Emanuele Castrucci deals with the metaphysical idea of potency as defined by Spinoza and Nietzsche, upsetting entrenched theories of jurisprudence. Castrucci first addresses how the idea of potency can change the meaning of the power ascribed to an omnipotent God. This brings together classical Greek philosophy with Jewish biblical exegesis, which Castrucci links through the juncture of Christianity. He then relates potency to the classical philosophical tradition in Aristotle's Metaphysics and its Arabic interpretations, particularly Ibn Rushd's (Averroës). This leads us to the genesis of natural law theory in Western philosophy, from Augustine to Aquinas and from Duns Scotus to Ockham. Moving on, Castrucci examines the inherently problematic concept of political theology, pitting Spinozan–Nietzschean potency against Kant and Enlightenment natural law to reveal the weaknesses inherent in the Enlightenment system. Finally, Castrucci applies the theories of Carl Schmitt to the philosophical rationalism of the Western tradition, showing us how it has failed to contain absolute power in a juridical sense. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5409","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5409,"authors_free":[{"id":6270,"entry_id":5409,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Emanuele Castrucci","free_first_name":"Emanuele","free_last_name":"Castrucci","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition"},"abstract":"A critique of the metaphysical concept of power and potency in the history of Western jurisprudence\r\n\r\nSweeping through the history of Western philosophy of law, Emanuele Castrucci deals with the metaphysical idea of potency as defined by Spinoza and Nietzsche, upsetting entrenched theories of jurisprudence.\r\n\r\nCastrucci first addresses how the idea of potency can change the meaning of the power ascribed to an omnipotent God. This brings together classical Greek philosophy with Jewish biblical exegesis, which Castrucci links through the juncture of Christianity. He then relates potency to the classical philosophical tradition in Aristotle's Metaphysics and its Arabic interpretations, particularly Ibn Rushd's (Averro\u00ebs). This leads us to the genesis of natural law theory in Western philosophy, from Augustine to Aquinas and from Duns Scotus to Ockham.\r\n\r\nMoving on, Castrucci examines the inherently problematic concept of political theology, pitting Spinozan\u2013Nietzschean potency against Kant and Enlightenment natural law to reveal the weaknesses inherent in the Enlightenment system. Finally, Castrucci applies the theories of Carl Schmitt to the philosophical rationalism of the Western tradition, showing us how it has failed to contain absolute power in a juridical sense.","btype":1,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781474411868","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5409,"pubplace":"Edinburgh ","publisher":"Edinburgh University Press","series":" Encounters in Law & Philosophy: ELP","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["On the Idea of Potency: Juridical and Theological Roots of the Western Cultural Tradition"]}