{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1636","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1636,"authors_free":[{"id":1892,"entry_id":1636,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1425,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","free_first_name":"Mehmet","free_last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","norm_person":{"id":1425,"first_name":"Mehmet","last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/101480661","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl"}}],"entry_title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b"},"abstract":"In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12730\/13091719.2010.12 (refers to the whole issue of the magazine)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1425,"full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1636,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"1","issue":"2","pages":"241\u2013258"}},"sort":["Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5047","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5047,"authors_free":[{"id":5796,"entry_id":5047,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1696,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sebastian G\u00fcnther","free_first_name":"Sebastian ","free_last_name":"G\u00fcnther","norm_person":{"id":1696,"first_name":"Sebastian","last_name":"G\u00fcnther","full_name":"Sebastian G\u00fcnther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139160531","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Sebastian G\u00fcnther"}}],"entry_title":"Only Learning That Distances You from Sins Today Saves You from Hellfire Tomorrow\u201d: Boundaries and Horizons of Education in al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Only Learning That Distances You from Sins Today Saves You from Hellfire Tomorrow\u201d: Boundaries and Horizons of Education in al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004413214_014","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":56,"category_name":"Science","link":"bib?categories[]=Science"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":1696,"full_name":"Sebastian G\u00fcnther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5047,"section_of":5046,"pages":"260\u2013297","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5046,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Knowledge and Education in Classical Islam: Religious Learning between Continuity and Change","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2020","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Knowledge and Education in Classical Islam: Religious Learning between Continuity and Change is a pioneering collection of essays on the historical developments, ideals, and practices of Islamic learning and teaching in the formative and classical periods of Islam (i.e., from the seventh to fifteenth centuries CE). Based on innovative and philologically sound primary source research, and utilizing the most recent methodological tools, this two volume set sheds new light on the challenges and opportunities that arise from a deep engagement with classical Islamic concepts of knowledge, its production and acquisition, and, of course, learning. Learning is especially important because of its relevance to contemporary communities and societies in our increasingly multicultural, \u201cglobal\u201d civilizations, whether Eastern or Western. ","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004413214","book":{"id":5046,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston ","publisher":"Brill","series":"Islamic History and Civilization","volume":"172","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Only Learning That Distances You from Sins Today Saves You from Hellfire Tomorrow\u201d: Boundaries and Horizons of Education in al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Rushd"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5395","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5395,"authors_free":[{"id":6253,"entry_id":5395,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1807,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","free_first_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr","free_last_name":"Koca","norm_person":{"id":1807,"first_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr","last_name":"Koca","full_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1101389664","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca"}}],"entry_title":"The First as Pure Act and Causality: The Case of Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The First as Pure Act and Causality: The Case of Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"The fourth chapter examines Ibn Rushd\u2019s account of causality. It will be argued that Ibn Rushd\u2019s theory of causality comes very close to Neo-Platonistic participatory accounts, despite his strong Aristotelian tendencies. Ibn Rushd, like Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, finds the basis of causal efficacy of entities in their participation in the pure existence-act of the First. The most important implication of this understanding of causality is that despite the occasionalist critique that we do not and cannot observe a necessary connection between cause and effect, for Ibn Rushd, the moment one defines existence as pure act, it metaphysically makes more sense to accept causal efficacy of entities, for they participate in the pure existence-act of the First. The chapter also examines the differences between Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 and Ibn Rushd that stem from the latter\u2019s efforts to address some of Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s challenges. Ibn Rushd agrees with Ghaz\u0101l\u012b in that plurality can emanate from the First without emanationist intermediation and solely based on the nature-capacity-form of beings. This view establishes a closer connection between the First\u2019s existence-act and the world than Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s metaphysics allows.","btype":2,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781108866965.005","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":25,"category_name":"Neoplatonism","link":"bib?categories[]=Neoplatonism"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1807,"full_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5395,"section_of":5394,"pages":"83\u201399","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5394,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2020","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781108866965","book":{"id":5394,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6252,"entry_id":5394,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","free_first_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr","free_last_name":"Koca","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":["The First as Pure Act and Causality: The Case of Ibn Rushd"]}