| Title | Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 27 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Influence, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Abuzar Rajabi , Morsal Azizi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali’s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5766","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5766,"authors_free":[{"id":6678,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abuzar Rajabi","free_first_name":"Abuzar ","free_last_name":"Rajabi","norm_person":null},{"id":6679,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morsal Azizi","free_first_name":"Morsal ","free_last_name":"Azizi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"},"abstract":"Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali\u2019s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.22108\/coth.2022.131221.1658","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5766,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"13","issue":"27","pages":"1-16"}},"sort":[2022]}
| This article is intended to illustrate that the hermeneutics of al-Ghazzali influenced Ibn Rushd in a certain degree. One can come across a number of contexts in the works of Ibn Rushd such as Tahafut al-tahafut, Fasl al-maqal and al-Kashf,in which he criticizes al-Ghazzali in relation to the interpretation of religious texts. However, one can notice that Ibn Rushd is deeply influenced by the views of al-Ghazzali on the matter of hermeneutics, especially concerning the definition of interpretation, the categorization of the ambiguous wordings in the religious texts as well as the classification of the groups of people authorized to fulfill the task of interpretation. In fact, Ibn Rushd’s threefold graduation of people as the masses, thetheologians, and the demonstrative people was masterminded and introduced by al-Ghazzali. In addition, it is from al-Ghazzali and from his interpretation of the125th verse of Surat al-Nahl that Ibn Rushd borrowed the suggestion that as regards the interpretation of religious texts, each of these three groups should adopt one of the three methods described as rhetorical, dialectical, and demonstrative. Another important context where Ibn Rushd is clearly under the influence of al-Ghazzali is the issue how the lawful method of interpretation is to be applied to the religious texts. Regarding this issue, he took up al-Ghazzali’s fivefold categorization of“being” as essential existence, sensual existence, imaginative existence, mental existence and analogical existence, suggesting to interpret the religious texts on the basis of this categorization. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5372","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5372,"authors_free":[{"id":6224,"entry_id":5372,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mesut Okumus","free_first_name":"Mesut","free_last_name":"Okumus","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Influence of al-Ghazzali on the Hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Influence of al-Ghazzali on the Hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"This article is intended to illustrate that the hermeneutics of al-Ghazzali influenced Ibn Rushd in a certain degree. One can come across a number of contexts in the works of Ibn Rushd such as Tahafut al-tahafut, Fasl al-maqal and al-Kashf,in which he criticizes al-Ghazzali in relation to the interpretation of religious texts. However, one can notice that Ibn Rushd is deeply influenced by the views of al-Ghazzali on the matter of hermeneutics, especially concerning the definition of interpretation, the categorization of the ambiguous wordings in the religious texts as well as the classification of the groups of people authorized to fulfill the task of interpretation. In fact, Ibn Rushd\u2019s threefold graduation of people as the masses, thetheologians, and the demonstrative people was masterminded and introduced by al-Ghazzali. In addition, it is from al-Ghazzali and from his interpretation of the125th verse of Surat al-Nahl that Ibn Rushd borrowed the suggestion that as regards the interpretation of religious texts, each of these three groups should adopt one of the three methods described as rhetorical, dialectical, and demonstrative. Another important context where Ibn Rushd is clearly under the influence of al-Ghazzali is the issue how the lawful method of interpretation is to be applied to the religious texts. Regarding this issue, he took up al-Ghazzali\u2019s fivefold categorization of\u201cbeing\u201d as essential existence, sensual existence, imaginative existence, mental existence and analogical existence, suggesting to interpret the religious texts on the basis of this categorization.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ISLAM.2011.023","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5372,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Der Islam","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"286\u2013311"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | إشكالية استمرار الدرس الفلسفي الرشدي. حول أثر الغزالي في المدرسة الرشدية بالمغرب |
| Transcription | ʾIškālīyat istimrār al-dars al-falsafī al-rušdī. Ḥaula aṯar al-Ġazālī fī al-madrasa al-rušdī bi-l-maġrib |
| Translation | The Decline of the Averroist Lesson. The Impact of al-Ghazālī on Maghrebi Averroism |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Alif. Journal of Comparative Poetics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 77–88 |
| Categories | Influence, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | ʿAbd al-Maǧīd al- Ṣaġīr |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"459","_score":null,"_source":{"id":459,"authors_free":[{"id":602,"entry_id":459,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":761,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al- \u1e62a\u0121\u012br","free_first_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al-","free_last_name":"\u1e62a\u0121\u012br","norm_person":{"id":761,"first_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al-","last_name":"\u1e62a\u0121\u012br","full_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al- \u1e62a\u0121\u012br","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103661557","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/118676435","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al- \u1e62a\u0121\u012br"}}],"entry_title":"\u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0631\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a. \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u0623\u062b\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0631\u0633\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0645\u063a\u0631\u0628","title_transcript":"\u02beI\u0161k\u0101l\u012byat istimr\u0101r al-dars al-falsaf\u012b al-ru\u0161d\u012b. \u1e24aula a\u1e6far al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b f\u012b al-madrasa al-ru\u0161d\u012b bi-l-ma\u0121rib","title_translation":"The Decline of the Averroist Lesson. The Impact of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b on Maghrebi Averroism","main_title":{"title":"\u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0631\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a. \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u0623\u062b\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0631\u0633\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0645\u063a\u0631\u0628"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"Arabic","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":761,"full_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al- \u1e62a\u0121\u012br","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":459,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Alif. Journal of Comparative Poetics","volume":"16","issue":null,"pages":"77\u201388"}},"sort":[1996]}
| Title | Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 27 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Influence, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Abuzar Rajabi , Morsal Azizi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali’s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5766","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5766,"authors_free":[{"id":6678,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abuzar Rajabi","free_first_name":"Abuzar ","free_last_name":"Rajabi","norm_person":null},{"id":6679,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morsal Azizi","free_first_name":"Morsal ","free_last_name":"Azizi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"},"abstract":"Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali\u2019s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.22108\/coth.2022.131221.1658","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5766,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"13","issue":"27","pages":"1-16"}},"sort":["Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"]}
| This article is intended to illustrate that the hermeneutics of al-Ghazzali influenced Ibn Rushd in a certain degree. One can come across a number of contexts in the works of Ibn Rushd such as Tahafut al-tahafut, Fasl al-maqal and al-Kashf,in which he criticizes al-Ghazzali in relation to the interpretation of religious texts. However, one can notice that Ibn Rushd is deeply influenced by the views of al-Ghazzali on the matter of hermeneutics, especially concerning the definition of interpretation, the categorization of the ambiguous wordings in the religious texts as well as the classification of the groups of people authorized to fulfill the task of interpretation. In fact, Ibn Rushd’s threefold graduation of people as the masses, thetheologians, and the demonstrative people was masterminded and introduced by al-Ghazzali. In addition, it is from al-Ghazzali and from his interpretation of the125th verse of Surat al-Nahl that Ibn Rushd borrowed the suggestion that as regards the interpretation of religious texts, each of these three groups should adopt one of the three methods described as rhetorical, dialectical, and demonstrative. Another important context where Ibn Rushd is clearly under the influence of al-Ghazzali is the issue how the lawful method of interpretation is to be applied to the religious texts. Regarding this issue, he took up al-Ghazzali’s fivefold categorization of“being” as essential existence, sensual existence, imaginative existence, mental existence and analogical existence, suggesting to interpret the religious texts on the basis of this categorization. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5372","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5372,"authors_free":[{"id":6224,"entry_id":5372,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mesut Okumus","free_first_name":"Mesut","free_last_name":"Okumus","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Influence of al-Ghazzali on the Hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Influence of al-Ghazzali on the Hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"This article is intended to illustrate that the hermeneutics of al-Ghazzali influenced Ibn Rushd in a certain degree. One can come across a number of contexts in the works of Ibn Rushd such as Tahafut al-tahafut, Fasl al-maqal and al-Kashf,in which he criticizes al-Ghazzali in relation to the interpretation of religious texts. However, one can notice that Ibn Rushd is deeply influenced by the views of al-Ghazzali on the matter of hermeneutics, especially concerning the definition of interpretation, the categorization of the ambiguous wordings in the religious texts as well as the classification of the groups of people authorized to fulfill the task of interpretation. In fact, Ibn Rushd\u2019s threefold graduation of people as the masses, thetheologians, and the demonstrative people was masterminded and introduced by al-Ghazzali. In addition, it is from al-Ghazzali and from his interpretation of the125th verse of Surat al-Nahl that Ibn Rushd borrowed the suggestion that as regards the interpretation of religious texts, each of these three groups should adopt one of the three methods described as rhetorical, dialectical, and demonstrative. Another important context where Ibn Rushd is clearly under the influence of al-Ghazzali is the issue how the lawful method of interpretation is to be applied to the religious texts. Regarding this issue, he took up al-Ghazzali\u2019s fivefold categorization of\u201cbeing\u201d as essential existence, sensual existence, imaginative existence, mental existence and analogical existence, suggesting to interpret the religious texts on the basis of this categorization.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ISLAM.2011.023","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5372,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Der Islam","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"286\u2013311"}},"sort":["The Influence of al-Ghazzali on the Hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd"]}
| Title | إشكالية استمرار الدرس الفلسفي الرشدي. حول أثر الغزالي في المدرسة الرشدية بالمغرب |
| Transcription | ʾIškālīyat istimrār al-dars al-falsafī al-rušdī. Ḥaula aṯar al-Ġazālī fī al-madrasa al-rušdī bi-l-maġrib |
| Translation | The Decline of the Averroist Lesson. The Impact of al-Ghazālī on Maghrebi Averroism |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Alif. Journal of Comparative Poetics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 77–88 |
| Categories | Influence, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | ʿAbd al-Maǧīd al- Ṣaġīr |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"459","_score":null,"_source":{"id":459,"authors_free":[{"id":602,"entry_id":459,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":761,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al- \u1e62a\u0121\u012br","free_first_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al-","free_last_name":"\u1e62a\u0121\u012br","norm_person":{"id":761,"first_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al-","last_name":"\u1e62a\u0121\u012br","full_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al- \u1e62a\u0121\u012br","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103661557","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/118676435","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al- \u1e62a\u0121\u012br"}}],"entry_title":"\u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0631\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a. \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u0623\u062b\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0631\u0633\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0645\u063a\u0631\u0628","title_transcript":"\u02beI\u0161k\u0101l\u012byat istimr\u0101r al-dars al-falsaf\u012b al-ru\u0161d\u012b. \u1e24aula a\u1e6far al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b f\u012b al-madrasa al-ru\u0161d\u012b bi-l-ma\u0121rib","title_translation":"The Decline of the Averroist Lesson. The Impact of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b on Maghrebi Averroism","main_title":{"title":"\u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0631\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a. \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u0623\u062b\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0631\u0633\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0645\u063a\u0631\u0628"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"Arabic","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":761,"full_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ma\u01e7\u012bd al- \u1e62a\u0121\u012br","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":459,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Alif. Journal of Comparative Poetics","volume":"16","issue":null,"pages":"77\u201388"}},"sort":["\u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0633\u062a\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u0631\u0633 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a. \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u0623\u062b\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062f\u0631\u0633\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0631\u0634\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0645\u063a\u0631\u0628"]}