Title | Revisiting Averroes’ Influence on Western Philosophy |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 174-194 |
Categories | Aristotle, Averroism, Tradition and Reception |
Author(s) | Anthony Raphael Etuk |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Better known as Averroes, Ibn Rushd remains one of the greatest Islamic philosophical geniuses of all times. The unparalleled inventiveness of his mind and the ―audacity‖ of his methods are evident in many of his innovative philosophical activities, which tremendous stirred the minds of his contemporaries in the Middle Ages. Perhaps only a few would deny the far-reaching impacts of his profound philosophical activities and ideas on Western philosophy. Prominent among these are his unique status as a paramount guide to Aristotle, based on his influential and massive commentaries on Aristotle, and his strong arguments for the compatibility of philosophy with religion. These and more, have since established the depth of his ideas and his lasting relevance in Western philosophy history. This paper undertakes an exposition of his philosophical activities, to identify the impacts of his enduring legacies on Western philosophy. The expository and hermeneutical methods of analysis are adopted. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5559","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5559,"authors_free":[{"id":6453,"entry_id":5559,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anthony Raphael Etuk","free_first_name":"Anthony Raphael ","free_last_name":"Etuk","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Revisiting Averroes\u2019 Influence on Western Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Revisiting Averroes\u2019 Influence on Western Philosophy"},"abstract":"Better known as Averroes, Ibn Rushd remains one of the greatest \r\nIslamic philosophical geniuses of all times. The unparalleled \r\ninventiveness of his mind and the \u2015audacity\u2016 of his methods are evident \r\nin many of his innovative philosophical activities, which tremendous \r\nstirred the minds of his contemporaries in the Middle Ages. Perhaps \r\nonly a few would deny the far-reaching impacts of his profound \r\nphilosophical activities and ideas on Western philosophy. Prominent \r\namong these are his unique status as a paramount guide to Aristotle, \r\nbased on his influential and massive commentaries on Aristotle, and his \r\nstrong arguments for the compatibility of philosophy with religion. \r\nThese and more, have since established the depth of his ideas and his \r\nlasting relevance in Western philosophy history. This paper undertakes \r\nan exposition of his philosophical activities, to identify the impacts of \r\nhis enduring legacies on Western philosophy. The expository and \r\nhermeneutical methods of analysis are adopted.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5559,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research","volume":"19","issue":"1","pages":"174-194"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Living in Convivencia: Intertwined Communities of Christians, Jews, and Muslims in Al-Andalus during the Caliphate of Córdoba |
Type | Monograph |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Series | Guilford College Thesis Collection |
Categories | Surveys, Politics, Theology |
Author(s) | Jacob Perkins |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/community.32506338 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5557","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5557,"authors_free":[{"id":6451,"entry_id":5557,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jacob Perkins","free_first_name":" Jacob","free_last_name":"Perkins","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Living in Convivencia: Intertwined Communities of Christians, Jews, and Muslims in Al-Andalus during the Caliphate of C\u00f3rdoba","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Living in Convivencia: Intertwined Communities of Christians, Jews, and Muslims in Al-Andalus during the Caliphate of C\u00f3rdoba"},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/community.32506338","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5557,"pubplace":"","publisher":"","series":"Guilford College Thesis Collection","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Averroè, una traduzione ininterrotta |
Type | Article |
Language | Italian |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Doctor Virtualis |
Volume | 17 |
Issue | Per Massimo Campanini |
Pages | 107-129 |
Categories | Tradition and Reception, Modern Interpretations and Adaptations, Modern Readings |
Author(s) | Augusto Illuminati |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
La mia collaborazione con Massimo Campanini si è sviluppata su comuni interessi per i classici del pensiero islamico ma con competenze assai diverse, essendo io più orientato a studiare gli effetti e gli sviluppi che essi produssero sul pensiero occidentale medievale e moderno attraverso una pratica di traduzioni spesso creative per imprecisione – l’inverso dell’operazione che essi stessi avevano fatto rispetto a Platone e Aristotele. Averroè-Ibn Rushd è già un bell’esempio di deformazione del nome, ma proprio la formazione della sua opera e i modi in cui è stata trasmessa al mondo ebraico e cristiano sono singolari testimonianze degli esiti ambigui del processo traduttivo. Cerchiamo infatti di mostrare come la lettura del De substantia orbis abbia stimolato sia nel Medioevo che nel Rinascimento non solo il rifiuto del creazionismo ma anche posizioni panteistiche, mentre la famosa tesi dell’intelletto materiale unico contenuta nel Commentarium Magnum al De anima aristotelico ha stimolato molteplici varianti del monopsichismo, da Spinoza a Marx e alla più recente letteratura post-strutturalista. My collaboration with Massimo Campanini developed around our common interests in the classics of Islamic thought, but with very different approaches, since I am more oriented towards studying the effects and developments they produced on medieval and modern Western thought through a practice of translation that was often creative in terms of inaccuracy – so the opposite of what had been done with respect to Plato and Aristotle. The same Averroes-Ibn Rushd is a fine example of name distortion, and the very formation of his work and the ways in which it was transmitted to the Jewish and Christian world are singular testimonies to the ambiguous outcomes of this translation process. I try to show how the reading of De substantia orbis in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance stimulated not only the rejection of creationism but also pantheistic beliefs, while the famous thesis on the material intellect exposed in the Commentarium Magnum to Aristotle’s De anima stimulated many variants of monopsychism, from Spinoza to Marx and the more recent post-structuralist literature. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5564","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5564,"authors_free":[{"id":6458,"entry_id":5564,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":649,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Augusto Illuminati","free_first_name":"Augusto ","free_last_name":"Illuminati","norm_person":{"id":649,"first_name":"Augusto","last_name":"Illuminati","full_name":"Augusto Illuminati","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111652483X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/93448260","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Augusto Illuminati"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8, una traduzione ininterrotta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8, una traduzione ininterrotta"},"abstract":"La mia collaborazione con Massimo Campanini si \u00e8 sviluppata su comuni interessi per i classici del pensiero islamico ma con competenze assai diverse, essendo io pi\u00f9 orientato a studiare gli effetti e gli sviluppi che essi produssero sul pensiero occidentale medievale e moderno attraverso una pratica di traduzioni spesso creative per imprecisione \u2013 l\u2019inverso dell\u2019operazione che essi stessi avevano fatto rispetto a Platone e Aristotele.\r\nAverro\u00e8-Ibn Rushd \u00e8 gi\u00e0 un bell\u2019esempio di deformazione del nome, ma proprio la formazione della sua opera e i modi in cui \u00e8 stata trasmessa al mondo ebraico e cristiano sono singolari testimonianze degli esiti ambigui del processo traduttivo. Cerchiamo infatti di mostrare come la lettura del De substantia orbis abbia stimolato sia nel Medioevo che nel Rinascimento non solo il rifiuto del creazionismo ma anche posizioni panteistiche, mentre la famosa tesi dell\u2019intelletto materiale unico contenuta nel Commentarium Magnum al De anima aristotelico ha stimolato molteplici varianti del monopsichismo, da Spinoza a Marx e alla pi\u00f9 recente letteratura post-strutturalista.\r\n\r\nMy collaboration with Massimo Campanini developed around our common interests in the classics of Islamic thought, but with very different approaches, since I am more oriented towards studying the effects and developments they produced on medieval and modern Western thought through a practice of translation that was often creative in terms of inaccuracy \u2013 so the opposite of what had been done with respect to Plato and Aristotle.\r\nThe same Averroes-Ibn Rushd is a fine example of name distortion, and the very formation of his work and the ways in which it was transmitted to the Jewish and Christian world are singular testimonies to the ambiguous outcomes of this translation process. I try to show how the reading of De substantia orbis in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance stimulated not only the rejection of creationism but also pantheistic beliefs, while the famous thesis on the material intellect exposed in the Commentarium Magnum to Aristotle\u2019s De anima stimulated many variants of monopsychism, from Spinoza to Marx and the more recent post-structuralist literature.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.54103\/2035-7362\/17830","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":52,"category_name":"Modern Interpretations and Adaptations","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Interpretations and Adaptations"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"}],"authors":[{"id":649,"full_name":"Augusto Illuminati","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5564,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Doctor Virtualis","volume":"17","issue":"Per Massimo Campanini","pages":"107-129"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Averroès grammairien |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Histoire Épistémologie Langage |
Volume | 44 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | S. 127-142 |
Categories | Linguistics, Logic |
Author(s) | Jean-Patrick Guillaume |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
The short treatise on Arabic grammar by Averroes (Ibn Rušd) entitled Al-Ḍarūrī fī ṣināˁat al-naḥw (“The Indispensable in the Art of Grammar”) is of considerable interest for the history of linguistic ideas. Although Averroes does not challenge the basic postulates and aims of traditional grammar, he adopts a more universalistic stance, and shows himself strongly critical of the grammarians, whom he reproaches with following an insufficiently rigorous method. This leads him, however, to raise a fundamental issue, already pointed out by Fārābī, the lack of a syntactic component in the traditional theory, and to put forth a quite original solution, reducing all possible constructions to two main types, predicative (tarkīb iḫbār) and determinative (tarkīb taqyīd). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5599","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5599,"authors_free":[{"id":6500,"entry_id":5599,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1855,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","free_first_name":"Jean-Patrick","free_last_name":"Guillaume","norm_person":{"id":1855,"first_name":"Jean-Patrick ","last_name":" Guillaume","full_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1117499030","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Patrick Guillaume"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s grammairien","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s grammairien"},"abstract":"The short treatise on Arabic grammar by Averroes (Ibn Ru\u0161d) entitled Al-\u1e0car\u016br\u012b f\u012b \u1e63in\u0101\u02c1at al-na\u1e25w (\u201cThe Indispensable in the Art of Grammar\u201d) is of considerable interest for the history of linguistic ideas. Although Averroes does not challenge the basic postulates and aims of traditional grammar, he adopts a more universalistic stance, and shows himself strongly critical of the grammarians, whom he reproaches with following an insufficiently rigorous method. This leads him, however, to raise a fundamental issue, already pointed out by F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, the lack of a syntactic component in the traditional theory, and to put forth a quite original solution, reducing all possible constructions to two main types, predicative (tark\u012bb i\u1e2bb\u0101r) and determinative (tark\u012bb taqy\u012bd).","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4000\/hel.2737","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":1855,"full_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5599,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Histoire \u00c9pist\u00e9mologie Langage","volume":" 44","issue":"2","pages":" S. 127-142"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts |
Type | Article |
Language | Arabic |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Comparative Theology |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 27 |
Pages | 1-16 |
Categories | al-Ġazālī, Influence, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
Author(s) | Abuzar Rajabi , Morsal Azizi |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali’s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5766","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5766,"authors_free":[{"id":6678,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abuzar Rajabi","free_first_name":"Abuzar ","free_last_name":"Rajabi","norm_person":null},{"id":6679,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morsal Azizi","free_first_name":"Morsal ","free_last_name":"Azizi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"},"abstract":"Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali\u2019s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.22108\/coth.2022.131221.1658","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5766,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"13","issue":"27","pages":"1-16"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd |
Type | Article |
Language | Indonesian |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama |
Volume | 16 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 71-92 |
Categories | Logic, Method, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
Author(s) | Raha Bistara |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash’ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd’s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5769","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5769,"authors_free":[{"id":6682,"entry_id":5769,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Raha Bistara","free_first_name":"Raha ","free_last_name":"Bistara","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd"},"abstract":"This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash\u2019ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd\u2019s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. ","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Indonesian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5769,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama","volume":"16","issue":"2","pages":"71-92"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Plato’s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Al Masaq: Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean |
Volume | 34 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 314-335 |
Categories | Commentary, Plato, Politics |
Author(s) | Tineke Melkebeek |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
In his commentary on Plato’s Republic, Ibn Rushd (Averroes) discusses the case for female guardians. Besides following Socrates’s argument for female warriors, which cites the efficiency of female guard dogs, Ibn Rushd introduces an additional argument: that the female capacity for warfare is evident from the inhabitants of certain regions. Unfortunately, the precise formulation of the regions or groups he intends to mention is obscure in the existing manuscripts. Rosenthal translates “the inhabitants of deserts and frontier villages”, Lerner’s translation says “the inhabitants of deserts and the City of Women”. This article aims to analyse these and other translations of this enigmatic passage, which has not yet been the subject of study. Concerning the second region mentioned, it seems that Ibn Rushd could be indicating Northern Spain, but he might also have been alluding to the legendary places at the coldest margins of the then-known world. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5767","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5767,"authors_free":[{"id":6680,"entry_id":5767,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tineke Melkebeek","free_first_name":"Tineke ","free_last_name":"Melkebeek","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage"},"abstract":"In his commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, Ibn Rushd (Averroes) discusses the case for female guardians. Besides following Socrates\u2019s argument for female warriors, which cites the efficiency of female guard dogs, Ibn Rushd introduces an additional argument: that the female capacity for warfare is evident from the inhabitants of certain regions. Unfortunately, the precise formulation of the regions or groups he intends to mention is obscure in the existing manuscripts. Rosenthal translates \u201cthe inhabitants of deserts and frontier villages\u201d, Lerner\u2019s translation says \u201cthe inhabitants of deserts and the City of Women\u201d. This article aims to analyse these and other translations of this enigmatic passage, which has not yet been the subject of study. Concerning the second region mentioned, it seems that Ibn Rushd could be indicating Northern Spain, but he might also have been alluding to the legendary places at the coldest margins of the then-known world.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09503110.2022.2114065","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5767,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al Masaq: Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":"34 ","issue":"3","pages":"314-335"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Philosophy East and West |
Volume | 72 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 960-972 |
Categories | Epistemology, Theology |
Author(s) | Kirk Lougheed , Joshua Lee Harris |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5795","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5795,"authors_free":[{"id":6715,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1683,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kirk Lougheed","free_first_name":"Kirk ","free_last_name":"Lougheed","norm_person":{"id":1683,"first_name":"Kirk","last_name":"Lougheed","full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080701206","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Kirk Lougheed"}},{"id":6716,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1901,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","free_first_name":"Joshua Lee ","free_last_name":"Harris","norm_person":{"id":1901,"first_name":"Joshua Lee ","last_name":"Harris","full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080676589","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Joshua Lee Harris"}}],"entry_title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge"},"abstract":"The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1683,"full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","role":1},{"id":1901,"full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5795,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy East and West","volume":"72","issue":"4","pages":"960-972"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | History of Philosophy Quarterly |
Volume | 39 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 339-354 |
Categories | Metaphysics, Psychology |
Author(s) | Hamid Taieb |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5805","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5805,"authors_free":[{"id":6726,"entry_id":5805,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1902,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hamid Taieb","free_first_name":"Hamid ","free_last_name":"Taieb","norm_person":{"id":1902,"first_name":"Hamid ","last_name":"Taieb","full_name":"Hamid Taieb","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077921705","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Hamid Taieb"}}],"entry_title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis"},"abstract":"This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.5406\/21521026.39.4.03","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1902,"full_name":"Hamid Taieb","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5805,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"39","issue":"4","pages":"339-354"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Lecteurs arabes et latins de Thémistius au Moyen Âge: l’intellect et ses objets |
Type | Article |
Language | undefined |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques |
Volume | 106 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 3-36 |
Categories | Tradition and Reception, Themistius, Aquinas, Aristotle, De anima, Intellect |
Author(s) | Elisa Coda |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle’s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5804","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5804,"authors_free":[{"id":6725,"entry_id":5804,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elisa Coda","free_first_name":"Elisa ","free_last_name":"Coda","norm_person":{"id":1738,"first_name":"Elisa","last_name":"Coda","full_name":"Elisa Coda","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1168595843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Elisa Coda"}}],"entry_title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"},"abstract":"This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle\u2019s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.1061.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":1738,"full_name":"Elisa Coda","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5804,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"106","issue":"1","pages":"3-36"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | A Comparison Between Khumainī's Government of the Jurist and The Commentary on Plato's Republic of Ibn Rushd |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1996 |
Journal | Journal of Islamic Studies |
Volume | 7 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 16–31 |
Categories | Politics |
Author(s) | Vanessa Martin |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26195475 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"751","_score":null,"_source":{"id":751,"authors_free":[{"id":911,"entry_id":751,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":939,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Vanessa Martin","free_first_name":"Vanessa","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":939,"first_name":"Vanessa","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Vanessa Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1089137915","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/100256567","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Vanessa Martin"}}],"entry_title":"A Comparison Between Khumain\u012b's Government of the Jurist and The Commentary on Plato's Republic of Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparison Between Khumain\u012b's Government of the Jurist and The Commentary on Plato's Republic of Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26195475","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":939,"full_name":"Vanessa Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":751,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"7","issue":"1","pages":"16\u201331"}},"sort":["A Comparison Between Khumain\u012b's Government of the Jurist and The Commentary on Plato's Republic of Ibn Rushd"]}
Title | A Further Word regarding Arabic Influences on Borges |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1969 |
Journal | Hispania |
Volume | 52 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 417-419 |
Categories | Influence |
Author(s) | Erika Spivakovsky |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/337895 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5691","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5691,"authors_free":[{"id":6597,"entry_id":5691,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Erika Spivakovsky","free_first_name":"Erika ","free_last_name":"Spivakovsky","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Further Word regarding Arabic Influences on Borges","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Further Word regarding Arabic Influences on Borges"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/337895","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5691,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hispania","volume":"52","issue":"3","pages":"417-419 "}},"sort":["A Further Word regarding Arabic Influences on Borges"]}
Title | A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes’ Recourse to Avicenna’s Madkhal of the Shifâ’ in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2018 |
Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
Volume | 29 |
Pages | 125–136 |
Categories | Avicenna, Commentary |
Author(s) | Silvia Di Vincenzo |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5144","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5144,"authors_free":[{"id":5923,"entry_id":5144,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Di Vincenzo","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Di Vincenzo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes\u2019 Recourse to Avicenna\u2019s Madkhal of the Shif\u00e2\u2019 in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry\u2019s Isagoge","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes\u2019 Recourse to Avicenna\u2019s Madkhal of the Shif\u00e2\u2019 in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry\u2019s Isagoge"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5144,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"29","issue":"","pages":"125\u2013136"}},"sort":["A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes\u2019 Recourse to Avicenna\u2019s Madkhal of the Shif\u00e2\u2019 in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry\u2019s Isagoge"]}
Title | A History of Islamic Philosophy |
Type | Monograph |
Language | undefined |
Date | 1970 |
Publication Place | New York, London |
Publisher | Columbia University Press |
Series | Studies in Oriental Culture |
Volume | 5 |
Categories | no categories |
Author(s) | Majid Fakhry |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1946","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1946,"authors_free":[{"id":2380,"entry_id":1946,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":750,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Majid Fakhry","free_first_name":"Majid","free_last_name":"Fakhry","norm_person":{"id":750,"first_name":"M\u0101\u01e7id","last_name":"Fa\u1e2br\u012b","full_name":"M\u0101\u01e7id Fa\u1e2br\u012b","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047951673","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/109420019","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=M\u0101\u01e7id Fa\u1e2br\u012b"}}],"entry_title":"A History of Islamic Philosophy","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A History of Islamic Philosophy"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1970","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":750,"full_name":"M\u0101\u01e7id Fa\u1e2br\u012b","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1946,"pubplace":"New York, London","publisher":"Columbia University Press","series":"Studies in Oriental Culture","volume":"5","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["A History of Islamic Philosophy"]}
Title | A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages |
Type | Monograph |
Language | undefined |
Date | 1985 |
Publication Place | Cambridge |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Categories | Tradition and Reception |
Author(s) | Colette Sirat |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"885","_score":null,"_source":{"id":885,"authors_free":[{"id":1052,"entry_id":885,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":992,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Colette Sirat","free_first_name":"Colette","free_last_name":"Sirat","norm_person":{"id":992,"first_name":"Colette","last_name":"Sirat","full_name":"Colette Sirat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/122662989","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97136920","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd122662989.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Colette Sirat"}}],"entry_title":"A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1985","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":992,"full_name":"Colette Sirat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":885,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["A History of Jewish Philosophy in the Middle Ages"]}
Title | A Literary History of Medicine - The ʿUyūn al-anbāʾ fī ṭabaqāt al-aṭibbāʾ of Ibn Abī Uṣaybiʿah |
Type | Edited Book |
Language | English |
Date | 2020 |
Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
Publisher | Brill |
Series | Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 1 The Near and Middle East |
Volume | 134 |
Categories | Medicine |
Author(s) | Aḥmad Ibn-al-Qāsim Ibn-Abī-Uṣaibiʿa , Emilie Savage-Smith , Simon Swain , Geert Jan van Gelder |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
A Literary History of Medicine by the Syrian physician Ibn Abī Uṣaybiʿah (d. 1270) is the earliest comprehensive history of medicine. It contains biographies of over 432 physicians, ranging from the ancient Greeks to the author’s contemporaries, describing their training and practice, often as court physicians, and listing their medical works; all this interlaced with poems and anecdotes. These volumes present the first complete and annotated translation along with a new edition of the Arabic text showing the stages in which the author composed the work. Introductory essays provide important background. The reader will find on these pages an Islamic society that worked closely with Christians and Jews, deeply committed to advancing knowledge and applying it to health and wellbeing. |
Online Access | https://brill.com/view/db/lhom?contents=about |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5093","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5093,"authors_free":[{"id":5863,"entry_id":5093,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"A\u1e25mad Ibn-al-Q\u0101sim Ibn-Ab\u012b-U\u1e63aibi\u02bfa","free_first_name":"A\u1e25mad Ibn-al-Q\u0101sim","free_last_name":"Ibn-Ab\u012b-U\u1e63aibi\u02bfa","norm_person":null},{"id":5864,"entry_id":5093,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":160,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Emilie Savage-Smith","free_first_name":"Emilie","free_last_name":"Savage-Smith","norm_person":{"id":160,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Emilie Savage-Smith","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/136075371","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/102329635","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Emilie Savage-Smith"}},{"id":5865,"entry_id":5093,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Simon Swain","free_first_name":"Simon","free_last_name":"Swain","norm_person":null},{"id":5866,"entry_id":5093,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1363,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Geert Jan van Gelder","free_first_name":"Geert Jan ","free_last_name":"van Gelder","norm_person":{"id":1363,"first_name":"Geert Jan","last_name":"van Gelder","full_name":"Geert Jan van Gelder","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132501775","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/222106583","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Geert Jan van Gelder"}}],"entry_title":"A Literary History of Medicine - The \u02bfUy\u016bn al-anb\u0101\u02be f\u012b \u1e6dabaq\u0101t al-a\u1e6dibb\u0101\u02be of Ibn Ab\u012b U\u1e63aybi\u02bfah","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Literary History of Medicine - The \u02bfUy\u016bn al-anb\u0101\u02be f\u012b \u1e6dabaq\u0101t al-a\u1e6dibb\u0101\u02be of Ibn Ab\u012b U\u1e63aybi\u02bfah"},"abstract":"A Literary History of Medicine by the Syrian physician Ibn Ab\u012b U\u1e63aybi\u02bfah (d. 1270) is the earliest comprehensive history of medicine. It contains biographies of over 432 physicians, ranging from the ancient Greeks to the author\u2019s contemporaries, describing their training and practice, often as court physicians, and listing their medical works; all this interlaced with poems and anecdotes. These volumes present the first complete and annotated translation along with a new edition of the Arabic text showing the stages in which the author composed the work. Introductory essays provide important background. The reader will find on these pages an Islamic society that worked closely with Christians and Jews, deeply committed to advancing knowledge and applying it to health and wellbeing. ","btype":4,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/brill.com\/view\/db\/lhom?contents=about","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"}],"authors":[{"id":160,"full_name":"Emilie Savage-Smith","role":2},{"id":1363,"full_name":"Geert Jan van Gelder","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5093,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":" Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section 1 The Near and Middle East","volume":"134","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["A Literary History of Medicine - The \u02bfUy\u016bn al-anb\u0101\u02be f\u012b \u1e6dabaq\u0101t al-a\u1e6dibb\u0101\u02be of Ibn Ab\u012b U\u1e63aybi\u02bfah"]}
Title | A Map of Averroes’ Criticism against Avicenna: Physics, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione and Meteorology |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2018 |
Published in | The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Physics and Cosmology |
Pages | 163–240 |
Categories | Avicenna, De caelo, Physics, Meteorology, Commentary, Surveys |
Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5128","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5128,"authors_free":[{"id":5904,"entry_id":5128,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Christina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"A Map of Averroes\u2019 Criticism against Avicenna: Physics, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione and Meteorology","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Map of Averroes\u2019 Criticism against Avicenna: Physics, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione and Meteorology"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781614516972-008","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":66,"category_name":"De caelo","link":"bib?categories[]=De caelo"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":67,"category_name":"Meteorology","link":"bib?categories[]=Meteorology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5128,"section_of":5126,"pages":"163\u2013240","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5126,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna\u2019s Physics and Cosmology","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2018","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Avicenna (Ibn S\u012bn\u0101) greatly influenced later medieval thinking about the earth and the cosmos, not only in his own civilization, but also in Hebrew and Latin cultures. The studies presented in this volume discuss the reception of prominent theories by Avicenna from the early 11th century onwards by thinkers like Averroes, Fahraddin ar-Razi, Samuel ibn Tibbon or Albertus Magnus. Among the topics which receive particular attention are the definition and existence of motion and time. Other important topics are covered too, such as Avicenna\u2019s theories of vacuum, causality, elements, substantial change, minerals, floods and mountains. It emerges, among other things, that Avicenna inherited to the discussion an acute sense for the epistemological status of natural science and for the mental and concrete existence of its objects. The volume also addresses the philological and historical circumstances of the textual tradition and sheds light on the translators Dominicus Gundisalvi, Avendauth and Alfred of Sareshel in particular.\r\nThe articles of this volume are presented by scholars who convened in 2013 to discuss their research on the influence of Avicenna\u2019s physics and cosmology in the Villa Vigoni, Italy.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781614516972","book":{"id":5126,"pubplace":"Boston; Berlin","publisher":"De Gruyter","series":"Scientia Graeco-Arabica","volume":"23","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A Map of Averroes\u2019 Criticism against Avicenna: Physics, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione and Meteorology"]}
Title | A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The ‘Decisive Treatise’ of Averroes |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2007 |
Journal | Peripatetikos |
Volume | 6 |
Pages | 1-25 |
Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Law, Theology |
Author(s) | Thérèse Bonin |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5337","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5337,"authors_free":[{"id":6183,"entry_id":5337,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1785,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","free_first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se ","free_last_name":"Bonin","norm_person":{"id":1785,"first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se","last_name":"Bonin","full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1197840044","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin"}}],"entry_title":"A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1785,"full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5337,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Peripatetikos","volume":"6 ","issue":"","pages":"1-25"}},"sort":["A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes"]}
Title | A New Manuscript Source for Pomponazzi's Theory of the Soul from his Paduan Period |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1951 |
Journal | Revue Internationale de Philosophie |
Volume | 5 |
Issue | 16 (2) |
Pages | 144-157 |
Categories | Tradition and Reception, Averroism, Latin Averroism, Aristotle |
Author(s) | Paul Oskar Kristeller |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23932355 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5641","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5641,"authors_free":[{"id":6546,"entry_id":5641,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":463,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Paul Oskar Kristeller","free_first_name":"Paul Oskar ","free_last_name":"Kristeller","norm_person":{"id":463,"first_name":"Paul Oskar","last_name":"Kristeller","full_name":"Paul Oskar Kristeller","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11877803X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/56612115","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd11877803X.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Paul Oskar Kristeller"}}],"entry_title":"A New Manuscript Source for Pomponazzi's Theory of the Soul from his Paduan Period","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A New Manuscript Source for Pomponazzi's Theory of the Soul from his Paduan Period"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1951","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23932355","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":463,"full_name":"Paul Oskar Kristeller","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5641,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue Internationale de Philosophie","volume":"5","issue":"16 (2) ","pages":"144-157"}},"sort":["A New Manuscript Source for Pomponazzi's Theory of the Soul from his Paduan Period"]}
Title | A Note about Two Newly-Discovered Hebrew Quotations of Averroes' Works Lost in their Original Arabic Texts |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2007 |
Published in | אודה לאוד״ה. Studies in Hebrew Literature and Jewish Culture. Presented to Albert van der Heide on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday |
Pages | 241–250 |
Categories | Transmission, Jewish Averroism |
Author(s) | Mauro Zonta |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1373","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1373,"authors_free":[{"id":1565,"entry_id":1373,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"A Note about Two Newly-Discovered Hebrew Quotations of Averroes' Works Lost in their Original Arabic Texts","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A Note about Two Newly-Discovered Hebrew Quotations of Averroes' Works Lost in their Original Arabic Texts"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":8,"category_name":"Jewish Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Jewish Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1373,"section_of":171,"pages":"241\u2013250","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":171,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"\u05d0\u05d5\u05d3\u05d4 \u05dc\u05d0\u05d5\u05d3\u05f4\u05d4. Studies in Hebrew Literature and Jewish Culture. Presented to Albert van der Heide on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2007","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2007","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":171,"pubplace":"Dordrecht","publisher":"Springer","series":"Amsterdam Studies in Jewish Thought","volume":"12","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A Note about Two Newly-Discovered Hebrew Quotations of Averroes' Works Lost in their Original Arabic Texts"]}