{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5289","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5289,"authors_free":[{"id":6108,"entry_id":5289,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Diego R. Sarri\u00f3","free_first_name":"Diego R.,","free_last_name":"Sarri\u00f3","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes"},"abstract":"El presente art\u00edculo argumenta que por debajo del marco jur\u00eddico del Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la raz\u00f3n con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliaci\u00f3n en la aceptaci\u00f3n de una teor\u00eda hermen\u00e9utica seg\u00fan la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano seg\u00fan su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el art\u00edculo sugiere que Averroes concibi\u00f3 la filosof\u00eda en t\u00e9rminos cuasi religiosos, como la obra m\u00e1s noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los leg\u00edtimos \u00abherederos de los profetas\u00bb.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/alqantara.2015.002 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5289,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qantara","volume":"36","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201368"}},"sort":["El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5462","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5462,"authors_free":[{"id":6326,"entry_id":5462,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd in the Hanbali tradition: Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Quyyim al-Jawziyya and the continuity of philosophy in Muslim contexts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd in the Hanbali tradition: Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Quyyim al-Jawziyya and the continuity of philosophy in Muslim contexts"},"abstract":"This article was presented at the conference \u201cPhilosophical Perspectives on Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity and Islam\u201d held at Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City, April 5 and 6, 2018, organized by Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat. I would like to thank him warmly for his generous invitation, Louise Agasse for her corrections of my English text, and Richard Taylor for his comments and suggestions. Finally, I thank Yahya Michot for agreeing to publish this text in The Muslim world. Unless otherweise noted, all translations from Arabic are my own.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12310","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5462,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"561-581"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd in the Hanbali tradition: Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Quyyim al-Jawziyya and the continuity of philosophy in Muslim contexts"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5770","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5770,"authors_free":[{"id":6683,"entry_id":5770,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ayesha Omar","free_first_name":"Ayesha ","free_last_name":"Omar","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform"},"abstract":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s the Decisive Treatise (1126\u201398) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd\u2019s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0971945818801398","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5770,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Medieval History Journal","volume":"22","issue":"1","pages":"131-155"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"464","_score":null,"_source":{"id":464,"authors_free":[{"id":607,"entry_id":464,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":759,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","free_first_name":"Jorge J. E.","free_last_name":"Gracia","norm_person":{"id":759,"first_name":"Jorge J. E.","last_name":"Gracia","full_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132482223","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/108952016","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd132482223.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jorge J. E. Gracia"}}],"entry_title":"Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27744734","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":759,"full_name":"Jorge J. E. Gracia","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":464,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"4","issue":null,"pages":"139\u2013153"}},"sort":["Interpretation and the Law. Averroes's Contribution to the Hermeneutics of Sacred Texts"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2036","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2036,"authors_free":[{"id":2476,"entry_id":2036,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1615,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","free_first_name":"Ang\u00e8le","free_last_name":"Kremer Marietti","norm_person":{"id":1615,"first_name":"Ang\u00e8le","last_name":"Kremer Marietti","full_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133757242","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/108823722","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti"}}],"entry_title":"La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"With \u201cLa pens\u00e9e libre d\u2019Averro\u00e8s\u201d, I wished to join the important themes of Philosophy and Religion as they are joined in Averro\u00e8s\u2019 thought, against the most conservative elements within Muslim societies, which disliked what appeared to be non-Muslim influences. Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s) wanted to encourage the study of philosophy, because he was sensitive to the increasing tensions that led to his banishment. Though written before his exile his DECISIVE TREATISE provides a defence for philosophers charged with unbelief. Therefore I took an interest in four approaches to Ibn Rusch\u2019s free thought. The first one was the distinction and relation between revelation and philosophy. Ibn Rushd\u2019s Decisive Treatise begins with the contention that Law commands the study of philosophy. Ibn Rushd based on some Quranic verses, such as \u201cReflect, you have a vision\u201d (59.2) and \u201cthey give thought to the creation of heaven and earth\u201d (3:191), that command human intellectual reflection upon God and his creation. Such obligation exists in religion, then a person who has the capacity of \u201cnatural intelligence\u201d and \u201creligious integrity\u201d must begin to study philosophy. Averro\u00e8s thought that philosophy could enlighten revelation, when this last might be difficult to be understood for human minds. The second point I treat is Averro\u00e8s\u2019s thought that written Law (scripture, in e. Qur\u2019an) and spoken law could be complementary each other. The Law speaks of three ways for humans to discover truth and interpret scripture: the demonstrative, the dialectical and the rhetorical. Therefore there are philosophers, theologians and the common masses. Ibn Rushd thought that demonstrative truth cannot conflict with scripture, because God gave various meanings and interpretations. Besides, the early Muslim community affirmed that scripture had both an apparent meaning and an inner meaning. Also, if it occurs that there is no consensus about a particular passage, its meaning is free for interpretation. My third point concerns the precise analysis of what is letter and what is spirit or \u201csense\u201d -as the contemporary philosophers ans phenomenologues think now- on the real meaning of this letter: the sense or the way that the letter must be understood. Finally may be joined the way of right thinking, or what could be the special form of procedure with its results. In the fourth point, I refer to another treatise, on the doctrine of God known as the EXPOSITION OF THE METHODS OF PROOF CONCERNING THE BELIEFS OF THE COMMUNITY. Ibn Rushd then wanted to examine the religious doctrines that are held by the public and to determine if any of the many doctrines expounded by the different sects were the intention of the \u201clawgiver\u201d. Meanwhile, he identified sects that have distorted the scriptures and developed innovative doctrines not compatible with Islam. Some arguments are examined: the first is the argument of Providence, in which one can observe that everything in the universe serves the purpose of humanity. The second is the argument of invention of plants and animals. Then he tried to explain the nature and attributes of God.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1615,"full_name":"Ang\u00e8le Kremer Marietti","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2036,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Analecta Husserliana","volume":"114","issue":null,"pages":"371-382"}},"sort":["La pens\u00e9e libre d'Averro\u00e8s"]}