| Title | Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Indonesian |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 71-92 |
| Categories | Logic, Method, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Raha Bistara |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash’ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd’s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5769","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5769,"authors_free":[{"id":6682,"entry_id":5769,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Raha Bistara","free_first_name":"Raha ","free_last_name":"Bistara","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd"},"abstract":"This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash\u2019ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd\u2019s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. ","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Indonesian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5769,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama","volume":"16","issue":"2","pages":"71-92"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Études Juives |
| Volume | 181 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 185–222 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Gersonides, Commentary, Method |
| Author(s) | Esti Eisenmann |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes’s Epitome of Aristotle’s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides’ exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides’ methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle’s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5386,"authors_free":[{"id":6238,"entry_id":5386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Esti Eisenmann","free_first_name":"Esti","free_last_name":"Eisenmann","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics"},"abstract":"The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes\u2019s Epitome of Aristotle\u2019s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides\u2019 exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides\u2019 methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle\u2019s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.2143\/REJ.181.1.3290628","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des \u00c9tudes Juives","volume":"181","issue":"1-2","pages":"185\u2013222"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Philosophy as Text and Context |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1985 |
| Journal | Philosophy & Rhetoric |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 158-170 |
| Categories | Method |
| Author(s) | Helen S. Lang |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237439 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5719","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5719,"authors_free":[{"id":6627,"entry_id":5719,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1882,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Helen S. Lang","free_first_name":"Helen S. ","free_last_name":"Lang","norm_person":{"id":1882,"first_name":"Helen S. ","last_name":"Lang","full_name":"Helen S. Lang","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172656605","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Helen S. Lang"}}],"entry_title":"Philosophy as Text and Context","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy as Text and Context"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1985","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/40237439","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[{"id":1882,"full_name":"Helen S. Lang","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5719,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy & Rhetoric","volume":"18","issue":"3","pages":"158-170"}},"sort":[1985]}
| Title | L'Epitomé du De caelo d'Aristote par Averroès. Questions de méthode et de doctrine |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1984 |
| Journal | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge |
| Volume | 51 |
| Pages | 7–39 |
| Categories | Cosmology, Aristotle, Method |
| Author(s) | Henri Hugonnard-Roche |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44403764 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"424","_score":null,"_source":{"id":424,"authors_free":[{"id":566,"entry_id":424,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Henri Hugonnard-Roche","free_first_name":"Henri","free_last_name":"Hugonnard-Roche","norm_person":{"id":738,"first_name":"Henri","last_name":"Hugonnard-Roche","full_name":"Henri Hugonnard-Roche","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1073891135","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/98426692","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1073891135.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Henri Hugonnard-Roche"}}],"entry_title":"L'Epitom\u00e9 du De caelo d'Aristote par Averro\u00e8s. Questions de m\u00e9thode et de doctrine","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L'Epitom\u00e9 du De caelo d'Aristote par Averro\u00e8s. Questions de m\u00e9thode et de doctrine"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1984","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44403764","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[{"id":738,"full_name":"Henri Hugonnard-Roche","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":424,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litt\u00e9raire du moyen \u00e2ge","volume":"51","issue":null,"pages":"7\u201339"}},"sort":[1984]}
| Title | Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Études Juives |
| Volume | 181 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 185–222 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Gersonides, Commentary, Method |
| Author(s) | Esti Eisenmann |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes’s Epitome of Aristotle’s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides’ exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides’ methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle’s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5386,"authors_free":[{"id":6238,"entry_id":5386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Esti Eisenmann","free_first_name":"Esti","free_last_name":"Eisenmann","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics"},"abstract":"The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes\u2019s Epitome of Aristotle\u2019s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides\u2019 exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides\u2019 methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle\u2019s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.2143\/REJ.181.1.3290628","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des \u00c9tudes Juives","volume":"181","issue":"1-2","pages":"185\u2013222"}},"sort":["Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics"]}
| Title | Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Indonesian |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 71-92 |
| Categories | Logic, Method, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Raha Bistara |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash’ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd’s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5769","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5769,"authors_free":[{"id":6682,"entry_id":5769,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Raha Bistara","free_first_name":"Raha ","free_last_name":"Bistara","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd"},"abstract":"This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash\u2019ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd\u2019s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. ","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Indonesian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5769,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama","volume":"16","issue":"2","pages":"71-92"}},"sort":["Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd"]}
| Title | L'Epitomé du De caelo d'Aristote par Averroès. Questions de méthode et de doctrine |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1984 |
| Journal | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge |
| Volume | 51 |
| Pages | 7–39 |
| Categories | Cosmology, Aristotle, Method |
| Author(s) | Henri Hugonnard-Roche |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44403764 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"424","_score":null,"_source":{"id":424,"authors_free":[{"id":566,"entry_id":424,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Henri Hugonnard-Roche","free_first_name":"Henri","free_last_name":"Hugonnard-Roche","norm_person":{"id":738,"first_name":"Henri","last_name":"Hugonnard-Roche","full_name":"Henri Hugonnard-Roche","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1073891135","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/98426692","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1073891135.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Henri Hugonnard-Roche"}}],"entry_title":"L'Epitom\u00e9 du De caelo d'Aristote par Averro\u00e8s. Questions de m\u00e9thode et de doctrine","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L'Epitom\u00e9 du De caelo d'Aristote par Averro\u00e8s. Questions de m\u00e9thode et de doctrine"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1984","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44403764","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[{"id":738,"full_name":"Henri Hugonnard-Roche","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":424,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litt\u00e9raire du moyen \u00e2ge","volume":"51","issue":null,"pages":"7\u201339"}},"sort":["L'Epitom\u00e9 du De caelo d'Aristote par Averro\u00e8s. Questions de m\u00e9thode et de doctrine"]}
| Title | Philosophy as Text and Context |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1985 |
| Journal | Philosophy & Rhetoric |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 158-170 |
| Categories | Method |
| Author(s) | Helen S. Lang |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40237439 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5719","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5719,"authors_free":[{"id":6627,"entry_id":5719,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1882,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Helen S. Lang","free_first_name":"Helen S. ","free_last_name":"Lang","norm_person":{"id":1882,"first_name":"Helen S. ","last_name":"Lang","full_name":"Helen S. Lang","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172656605","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Helen S. Lang"}}],"entry_title":"Philosophy as Text and Context","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy as Text and Context"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1985","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/40237439","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[{"id":1882,"full_name":"Helen S. Lang","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5719,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy & Rhetoric","volume":"18","issue":"3","pages":"158-170"}},"sort":["Philosophy as Text and Context"]}