{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1716","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1716,"authors_free":[{"id":1981,"entry_id":1716,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Les sources et le sens de l'anti-averro\u00efsme de Thomas de Strasbourg"},"abstract":"In his commnentary on the Sentences (book II, dist. XVII, q. 1), doubtless read at Paris between 1335 and 1337, Thomas de Strasbourg (\u2020 1357) contests in a dense and singular fashion the noetic of Averroes and the Averroists. His reading depends at once upon two figures. First, Giles of Rome, who denounces in the theory of the continuatio a feature that makes of the image the second subject-substrate of the intelligible. Second, Durandus of Saint-Pour\u00e7ain, who with Herv\u00e9 N\u00e9dellec, opposes to the Commentator a novel perspective of the subject applied to man. This paper studies this theoretical pro-duction as it bears witness to the dynamism of the quarrel over Averroism and which enlists Thomas of Strasbourg in this long chronicle in which the modern notion of sub-jectivity is worked out.","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44408930","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1716,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"90","issue":"4","pages":"641\u2013663"}},"sort":[2006]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1559","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1559,"authors_free":[{"id":1790,"entry_id":1559,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il invent\u00e9 une th\u00e9orie des deux sujets de la pens\u00e9e"},"abstract":"According to Thomas Aquinas, Averroes's philosophy of the mind is characterized by the doctrine of the \"double subject\", which is found in his Long Commentary on the De anima. As it is well-known, Averroes asserts that the intelligibles in act or theoretical intelligibles may be said to have two subjects (duo subiecta): the material intellect and the image of the cogitative power, whose connection allows individual human beings to think. We try here to know if it is properly a \"theory\" produced by Averroes. By analysing all the texts dealing with it, we both intend to justify the use of the term \"subiectum\" applied to the image and to show that the expression \"duo subiecta\", equivocal from a lexical point of view, is totally clear from a conceptual one. The doctrine of the double subject is certainly a thesis of Averroes consequent with his latter stage of his philosophy and his new teaching on the material intellect, but it is not, contrary to the interpretation of his Latin opponents, the doctrine of the two \"substrates\" which would make man the second place of the intelligible in act.","btype":3,"date":"2005","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1559,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"T\u00f3picos. Revista de Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"53\u201386"}},"sort":[2005]}