Title | Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect? |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2023 |
Journal | International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies |
Volume | 3 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 51-58 |
Categories | Aristotle, De anima, Intellect, Aquinas |
Author(s) | Elka Anakotta |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5796","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5796,"authors_free":[{"id":6717,"entry_id":5796,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elka Anakotta","free_first_name":"Elka","free_last_name":"Anakotta","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?"},"abstract":"Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.32996\/ijcrs.2023.3.2.7","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5796,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"51-58"}},"sort":[2023]}
Title | Lecteurs arabes et latins de Thémistius au Moyen Âge: l’intellect et ses objets |
Type | Article |
Language | undefined |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques |
Volume | 106 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 3-36 |
Categories | Tradition and Reception, Themistius, Aquinas, Aristotle, De anima, Intellect |
Author(s) | Elisa Coda |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle’s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5804","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5804,"authors_free":[{"id":6725,"entry_id":5804,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elisa Coda","free_first_name":"Elisa ","free_last_name":"Coda","norm_person":{"id":1738,"first_name":"Elisa","last_name":"Coda","full_name":"Elisa Coda","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1168595843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Elisa Coda"}}],"entry_title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"},"abstract":"This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle\u2019s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.1061.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":1738,"full_name":"Elisa Coda","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5804,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"106","issue":"1","pages":"3-36"}},"sort":[2022]}
Title | L’intellect - Compendium du livre De l’âme |
Type | Monograph |
Language | undefined |
Date | 2022 |
Publication Place | Paris |
Publisher | Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin |
Series | Sic et Non |
Categories | De anima, Psychology, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Commentary, Intellect |
Author(s) | Averroes , Jean-Baptiste Brenet , David Wirmer |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Le Compendium du livre De l’âme d’Aristote (Muḫtaṣar Kitāb al-nafs) compte parmi les premières œuvres d’exégète d’Averroès. On en traduit ici le chapitre sur l’intellect qui contient l’essentiel des questions sur lesquelles le Commentateur reviendra dans toute son œuvre. Ce qui l’occupe est d’établir si l’acte de l’intellect humain est permanent ou bien intermittent, et plus largement de savoir si notre puissance rationnelle est elle-même éternelle ou bien engendrée et corruptible. L’auteur montre que nos concepts sont en vérité ambivalents et que s’ils sont en partie soustraits au temps par leur sens, leur rapport aux images leur confère une forme de potentialité. C’est sur cette puissance que l’accent est mis : quelle est la nature de la capacité de penser? quel peut-être son substrat? qu’est-ce qui la meut, et jusqu’où? L’édition du texte par David Wirmer montre qu’il fut plusieurs fois révisé et son intérêt est double. Il montre à la fois quelle fut la doctrine du jeune Averroès, disciple de son prédécesseur andalou Ibn Bāğğa (Avempace), et comment le Cordouan inlassablement critique devait juger bon de la réviser. Averroès est connu dans l’histoire comme l’auteur du Grand Commentaire du traité De l’âme. C’est dans ce texte du Compendium qu’on voit s’en profiler la doctrine. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5415","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5415,"authors_free":[{"id":6280,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":6281,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}},{"id":6282,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":140,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"David Wirmer","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Wirmer","norm_person":{"id":140,"first_name":"David","last_name":"Wirmer","full_name":"David Wirmer","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134066669","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/13518425","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=David Wirmer"}}],"entry_title":"L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me"},"abstract":"Le Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me d\u2019Aristote (Mu\u1e2bta\u1e63ar Kit\u0101b al-nafs) compte parmi les premi\u00e8res \u0153uvres d\u2019ex\u00e9g\u00e8te d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. On en traduit ici le chapitre sur l\u2019intellect qui contient l\u2019essentiel des questions sur lesquelles le Commentateur reviendra dans toute son \u0153uvre. Ce qui l\u2019occupe est d\u2019\u00e9tablir si l\u2019acte de l\u2019intellect humain est permanent ou bien intermittent, et plus largement de savoir si notre puissance rationnelle est elle-m\u00eame \u00e9ternelle ou bien engendr\u00e9e et corruptible. L\u2019auteur montre que nos concepts sont en v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ambivalents et que s\u2019ils sont en partie soustraits au temps par leur sens, leur rapport aux images leur conf\u00e8re une forme de potentialit\u00e9. C\u2019est sur cette puissance que l\u2019accent est mis : quelle est la nature de la capacit\u00e9 de penser? quel peut-\u00eatre son substrat? qu\u2019est-ce qui la meut, et jusqu\u2019o\u00f9?\r\nL\u2019\u00e9dition du texte par David Wirmer montre qu\u2019il fut plusieurs fois r\u00e9vis\u00e9 et son int\u00e9r\u00eat est double. Il montre \u00e0 la fois quelle fut la doctrine du jeune Averro\u00e8s, disciple de son pr\u00e9d\u00e9cesseur andalou Ibn B\u0101\u011f\u011fa (Avempace), et comment le Cordouan inlassablement critique devait juger bon de la r\u00e9viser. Averro\u00e8s est connu dans l\u2019histoire comme l\u2019auteur du Grand Commentaire du trait\u00e9 De l\u2019\u00e2me. C\u2019est dans ce texte du Compendium qu\u2019on voit s\u2019en profiler la doctrine.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":2},{"id":140,"full_name":"David Wirmer","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5415,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin ","series":"Sic et Non","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Averroes’ Doctrine of Material Intellect in the Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2021 |
Journal | mevzu |
Volume | 5 |
Pages | 39-66 |
Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, De anima, Intellect |
Author(s) | Musa Duman |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Averroes was fully aware of the fact that Aristotle’s account of intellect as propounded in De Anima was incomplete. This meant that the key facet of Aristotle’s thought was fraught with gaps. Averroes made repeated attempts in his commentaries on De Anima to fill the gaps. The problem for Averroes was this: “if human beings are enmattered entities, how will anything more than sense perception be possible?” Averroes believes that finally in his Long Commentary on De Anima he has achieved a full and coherent account of thinking and understanding that centers on a new notion of the material intellect, according to which, together with the active intellect, there is also a distinct material intellect, numerically one for all human beings. The present article explores in detail this idea of material intellect. It is shown that material intellect, for Averroes, functions as the transpersonal, non-particular and non empirical subject required for the production and containment of universal meanings. The idea seems to aim at connecting consistently the embodied, sensible forms of human cognitive experience with the noetic, conceptual element of knowledge within a basically ontological account. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5573","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5573,"authors_free":[{"id":6467,"entry_id":5573,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":" Musa Duman","free_first_name":" Musa ","free_last_name":" Duman","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averroes\u2019 Doctrine of Material Intellect in the Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes\u2019 Doctrine of Material Intellect in the Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle"},"abstract":"Averroes was fully aware of the fact that Aristotle\u2019s account of intellect \r\nas propounded in De Anima was incomplete. This meant that the key facet of \r\nAristotle\u2019s thought was fraught with gaps. Averroes made repeated attempts \r\nin his commentaries on De Anima to fill the gaps. The problem for Averroes \r\nwas this: \u201cif human beings are enmattered entities, how will anything more \r\nthan sense perception be possible?\u201d Averroes believes that finally in his Long \r\nCommentary on De Anima he has achieved a full and coherent account of thinking and understanding that centers on a new notion of the material intellect, according to which, together with the active intellect, there is also a distinct material intellect, numerically one for all human beings. The present article explores in detail this idea of material intellect. It is shown that material intellect, for Averroes, functions as the transpersonal, non-particular and non empirical subject required for the production and containment of universal meanings. The idea seems to aim at connecting consistently the embodied, sensible forms of human cognitive experience with the noetic, conceptual element of knowledge within a basically ontological account.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" 10.5281\/zenodo.4604660","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5573,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"mevzu","volume":" 5","issue":"","pages":"39-66"}},"sort":[2021]}
Title | De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert |
Type | Monograph |
Language | German |
Date | 2006 |
Publication Place | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
Publisher | Grüner |
Series | Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie |
Volume | 43 |
Categories | Renaissance, Intellect, Psychology, De anima, Aristotle |
Author(s) | Sascha Salatowsky |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Aristoteles' De Anima ist einer der zentralen Texte der Philosophiegeschichte. Seine grundlegende Leistung liegt in der alle Lebewesen umfassenden ontologisch-ontischen Bestimmung der Seele und ihrer Vermögen, einschließlich der Lehre vom Geist (nous), deren nähere Explikation seit der Antike Anlaß zu vielfältigen Diskussionen gab. Die vorliegende Studie ermittelt unter Rückgriff auf die traditionellen Schulen des Alexandrismus, Neuplatonismus, Averroismus und Thomismus diejenigen mannigfaltigen philosophischen und theologischen Konstellationen des 16. und 17. Jh.s, die von innerkatholischen wie interkonfessionellen Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Katholiken, Lutheranern und Calvinisten geprägt waren. Unter diesem Gesichtspunkt werden die entsprechenden Werke der Reformatoren Luther und Melanchthon, der Renaissance-Aristoteliker Portio, Toletus, Zabarella und die Conimbrincenser sowie die hier erstmals berücksichtigten Schriften der lutherischen und calvinistischen Schulphilosophen des 17. Jh.s. interpretiert. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5822","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5822,"authors_free":[{"id":6755,"entry_id":5822,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sascha Salatowsky","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert"},"abstract":"Aristoteles' De Anima ist einer der zentralen Texte der Philosophiegeschichte. Seine grundlegende Leistung liegt in der alle Lebewesen umfassenden ontologisch-ontischen Bestimmung der Seele und ihrer Verm\u00f6gen, einschlie\u00dflich der Lehre vom Geist (nous), deren n\u00e4here Explikation seit der Antike Anla\u00df zu vielf\u00e4ltigen Diskussionen gab.\r\nDie vorliegende Studie ermittelt unter R\u00fcckgriff auf die traditionellen Schulen des Alexandrismus, Neuplatonismus, Averroismus und Thomismus diejenigen mannigfaltigen philosophischen und theologischen Konstellationen des 16. und 17. Jh.s, die von innerkatholischen wie interkonfessionellen Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Katholiken, Lutheranern und Calvinisten gepr\u00e4gt waren. Unter diesem Gesichtspunkt werden die entsprechenden Werke der Reformatoren Luther und Melanchthon, der Renaissance-Aristoteliker Portio, Toletus, Zabarella und die Conimbrincenser sowie die hier erstmals ber\u00fccksichtigten Schriften der lutherischen und calvinistischen Schulphilosophen des 17. Jh.s.\u00a0interpretiert.","btype":1,"date":"2006","language":"German","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5822,"pubplace":"Amsterdam \/ Philadelphia","publisher":"Gr\u00fcner","series":"Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie","volume":"43","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2006]}
Title | Psychologie im katholischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus. Die Auseinandersetzung mit Averroes |
Type | Book Section |
Language | German |
Date | 2006 |
Published in | De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert |
Pages | 184 - 209 |
Categories | De anima, Psychology, Intellect, Renaissance |
Author(s) | Sascha Salatowsky |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5821","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5821,"authors_free":[{"id":6754,"entry_id":5821,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sascha Salatowsky","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Psychologie im katholischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus. Die Auseinandersetzung mit Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Psychologie im katholischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus. Die Auseinandersetzung mit Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2006","language":"German","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5821,"pubplace":"","publisher":"","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":{"id":5821,"section_of":5822,"pages":"184 - 209","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5822,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"de","title":"De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2006","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Aristoteles' De Anima ist einer der zentralen Texte der Philosophiegeschichte. Seine grundlegende Leistung liegt in der alle Lebewesen umfassenden ontologisch-ontischen Bestimmung der Seele und ihrer Verm\u00f6gen, einschlie\u00dflich der Lehre vom Geist (nous), deren n\u00e4here Explikation seit der Antike Anla\u00df zu vielf\u00e4ltigen Diskussionen gab.\r\nDie vorliegende Studie ermittelt unter R\u00fcckgriff auf die traditionellen Schulen des Alexandrismus, Neuplatonismus, Averroismus und Thomismus diejenigen mannigfaltigen philosophischen und theologischen Konstellationen des 16. und 17. Jh.s, die von innerkatholischen wie interkonfessionellen Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Katholiken, Lutheranern und Calvinisten gepr\u00e4gt waren. Unter diesem Gesichtspunkt werden die entsprechenden Werke der Reformatoren Luther und Melanchthon, der Renaissance-Aristoteliker Portio, Toletus, Zabarella und die Conimbrincenser sowie die hier erstmals ber\u00fccksichtigten Schriften der lutherischen und calvinistischen Schulphilosophen des 17. Jh.s.\u00a0interpretiert.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5822,"pubplace":"Amsterdam \/ Philadelphia","publisher":"Gr\u00fcner","series":"Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie","volume":"43","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6755,"entry_id":5822,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sascha Salatowsky","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2006]}
Title | Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect? |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2023 |
Journal | International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies |
Volume | 3 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 51-58 |
Categories | Aristotle, De anima, Intellect, Aquinas |
Author(s) | Elka Anakotta |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5796","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5796,"authors_free":[{"id":6717,"entry_id":5796,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elka Anakotta","free_first_name":"Elka","free_last_name":"Anakotta","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?"},"abstract":"Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.32996\/ijcrs.2023.3.2.7","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5796,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"51-58"}},"sort":["Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?"]}
Title | Averroes’ Doctrine of Material Intellect in the Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 2021 |
Journal | mevzu |
Volume | 5 |
Pages | 39-66 |
Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, De anima, Intellect |
Author(s) | Musa Duman |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Averroes was fully aware of the fact that Aristotle’s account of intellect as propounded in De Anima was incomplete. This meant that the key facet of Aristotle’s thought was fraught with gaps. Averroes made repeated attempts in his commentaries on De Anima to fill the gaps. The problem for Averroes was this: “if human beings are enmattered entities, how will anything more than sense perception be possible?” Averroes believes that finally in his Long Commentary on De Anima he has achieved a full and coherent account of thinking and understanding that centers on a new notion of the material intellect, according to which, together with the active intellect, there is also a distinct material intellect, numerically one for all human beings. The present article explores in detail this idea of material intellect. It is shown that material intellect, for Averroes, functions as the transpersonal, non-particular and non empirical subject required for the production and containment of universal meanings. The idea seems to aim at connecting consistently the embodied, sensible forms of human cognitive experience with the noetic, conceptual element of knowledge within a basically ontological account. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5573","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5573,"authors_free":[{"id":6467,"entry_id":5573,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":" Musa Duman","free_first_name":" Musa ","free_last_name":" Duman","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averroes\u2019 Doctrine of Material Intellect in the Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes\u2019 Doctrine of Material Intellect in the Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle"},"abstract":"Averroes was fully aware of the fact that Aristotle\u2019s account of intellect \r\nas propounded in De Anima was incomplete. This meant that the key facet of \r\nAristotle\u2019s thought was fraught with gaps. Averroes made repeated attempts \r\nin his commentaries on De Anima to fill the gaps. The problem for Averroes \r\nwas this: \u201cif human beings are enmattered entities, how will anything more \r\nthan sense perception be possible?\u201d Averroes believes that finally in his Long \r\nCommentary on De Anima he has achieved a full and coherent account of thinking and understanding that centers on a new notion of the material intellect, according to which, together with the active intellect, there is also a distinct material intellect, numerically one for all human beings. The present article explores in detail this idea of material intellect. It is shown that material intellect, for Averroes, functions as the transpersonal, non-particular and non empirical subject required for the production and containment of universal meanings. The idea seems to aim at connecting consistently the embodied, sensible forms of human cognitive experience with the noetic, conceptual element of knowledge within a basically ontological account.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" 10.5281\/zenodo.4604660","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5573,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"mevzu","volume":" 5","issue":"","pages":"39-66"}},"sort":["Averroes\u2019 Doctrine of Material Intellect in the Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle"]}
Title | De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert |
Type | Monograph |
Language | German |
Date | 2006 |
Publication Place | Amsterdam / Philadelphia |
Publisher | Grüner |
Series | Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie |
Volume | 43 |
Categories | Renaissance, Intellect, Psychology, De anima, Aristotle |
Author(s) | Sascha Salatowsky |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Aristoteles' De Anima ist einer der zentralen Texte der Philosophiegeschichte. Seine grundlegende Leistung liegt in der alle Lebewesen umfassenden ontologisch-ontischen Bestimmung der Seele und ihrer Vermögen, einschließlich der Lehre vom Geist (nous), deren nähere Explikation seit der Antike Anlaß zu vielfältigen Diskussionen gab. Die vorliegende Studie ermittelt unter Rückgriff auf die traditionellen Schulen des Alexandrismus, Neuplatonismus, Averroismus und Thomismus diejenigen mannigfaltigen philosophischen und theologischen Konstellationen des 16. und 17. Jh.s, die von innerkatholischen wie interkonfessionellen Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Katholiken, Lutheranern und Calvinisten geprägt waren. Unter diesem Gesichtspunkt werden die entsprechenden Werke der Reformatoren Luther und Melanchthon, der Renaissance-Aristoteliker Portio, Toletus, Zabarella und die Conimbrincenser sowie die hier erstmals berücksichtigten Schriften der lutherischen und calvinistischen Schulphilosophen des 17. Jh.s. interpretiert. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5822","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5822,"authors_free":[{"id":6755,"entry_id":5822,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sascha Salatowsky","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert"},"abstract":"Aristoteles' De Anima ist einer der zentralen Texte der Philosophiegeschichte. Seine grundlegende Leistung liegt in der alle Lebewesen umfassenden ontologisch-ontischen Bestimmung der Seele und ihrer Verm\u00f6gen, einschlie\u00dflich der Lehre vom Geist (nous), deren n\u00e4here Explikation seit der Antike Anla\u00df zu vielf\u00e4ltigen Diskussionen gab.\r\nDie vorliegende Studie ermittelt unter R\u00fcckgriff auf die traditionellen Schulen des Alexandrismus, Neuplatonismus, Averroismus und Thomismus diejenigen mannigfaltigen philosophischen und theologischen Konstellationen des 16. und 17. Jh.s, die von innerkatholischen wie interkonfessionellen Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Katholiken, Lutheranern und Calvinisten gepr\u00e4gt waren. Unter diesem Gesichtspunkt werden die entsprechenden Werke der Reformatoren Luther und Melanchthon, der Renaissance-Aristoteliker Portio, Toletus, Zabarella und die Conimbrincenser sowie die hier erstmals ber\u00fccksichtigten Schriften der lutherischen und calvinistischen Schulphilosophen des 17. Jh.s.\u00a0interpretiert.","btype":1,"date":"2006","language":"German","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5822,"pubplace":"Amsterdam \/ Philadelphia","publisher":"Gr\u00fcner","series":"Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie","volume":"43","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert"]}
Title | Lecteurs arabes et latins de Thémistius au Moyen Âge: l’intellect et ses objets |
Type | Article |
Language | undefined |
Date | 2022 |
Journal | Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques |
Volume | 106 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 3-36 |
Categories | Tradition and Reception, Themistius, Aquinas, Aristotle, De anima, Intellect |
Author(s) | Elisa Coda |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle’s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5804","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5804,"authors_free":[{"id":6725,"entry_id":5804,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elisa Coda","free_first_name":"Elisa ","free_last_name":"Coda","norm_person":{"id":1738,"first_name":"Elisa","last_name":"Coda","full_name":"Elisa Coda","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1168595843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Elisa Coda"}}],"entry_title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"},"abstract":"This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle\u2019s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.1061.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":1738,"full_name":"Elisa Coda","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5804,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"106","issue":"1","pages":"3-36"}},"sort":["Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"]}
Title | L’intellect - Compendium du livre De l’âme |
Type | Monograph |
Language | undefined |
Date | 2022 |
Publication Place | Paris |
Publisher | Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin |
Series | Sic et Non |
Categories | De anima, Psychology, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Commentary, Intellect |
Author(s) | Averroes , Jean-Baptiste Brenet , David Wirmer |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Le Compendium du livre De l’âme d’Aristote (Muḫtaṣar Kitāb al-nafs) compte parmi les premières œuvres d’exégète d’Averroès. On en traduit ici le chapitre sur l’intellect qui contient l’essentiel des questions sur lesquelles le Commentateur reviendra dans toute son œuvre. Ce qui l’occupe est d’établir si l’acte de l’intellect humain est permanent ou bien intermittent, et plus largement de savoir si notre puissance rationnelle est elle-même éternelle ou bien engendrée et corruptible. L’auteur montre que nos concepts sont en vérité ambivalents et que s’ils sont en partie soustraits au temps par leur sens, leur rapport aux images leur confère une forme de potentialité. C’est sur cette puissance que l’accent est mis : quelle est la nature de la capacité de penser? quel peut-être son substrat? qu’est-ce qui la meut, et jusqu’où? L’édition du texte par David Wirmer montre qu’il fut plusieurs fois révisé et son intérêt est double. Il montre à la fois quelle fut la doctrine du jeune Averroès, disciple de son prédécesseur andalou Ibn Bāğğa (Avempace), et comment le Cordouan inlassablement critique devait juger bon de la réviser. Averroès est connu dans l’histoire comme l’auteur du Grand Commentaire du traité De l’âme. C’est dans ce texte du Compendium qu’on voit s’en profiler la doctrine. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5415","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5415,"authors_free":[{"id":6280,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":6281,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}},{"id":6282,"entry_id":5415,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":140,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"David Wirmer","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Wirmer","norm_person":{"id":140,"first_name":"David","last_name":"Wirmer","full_name":"David Wirmer","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134066669","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/13518425","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=David Wirmer"}}],"entry_title":"L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me"},"abstract":"Le Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me d\u2019Aristote (Mu\u1e2bta\u1e63ar Kit\u0101b al-nafs) compte parmi les premi\u00e8res \u0153uvres d\u2019ex\u00e9g\u00e8te d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. On en traduit ici le chapitre sur l\u2019intellect qui contient l\u2019essentiel des questions sur lesquelles le Commentateur reviendra dans toute son \u0153uvre. Ce qui l\u2019occupe est d\u2019\u00e9tablir si l\u2019acte de l\u2019intellect humain est permanent ou bien intermittent, et plus largement de savoir si notre puissance rationnelle est elle-m\u00eame \u00e9ternelle ou bien engendr\u00e9e et corruptible. L\u2019auteur montre que nos concepts sont en v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ambivalents et que s\u2019ils sont en partie soustraits au temps par leur sens, leur rapport aux images leur conf\u00e8re une forme de potentialit\u00e9. C\u2019est sur cette puissance que l\u2019accent est mis : quelle est la nature de la capacit\u00e9 de penser? quel peut-\u00eatre son substrat? qu\u2019est-ce qui la meut, et jusqu\u2019o\u00f9?\r\nL\u2019\u00e9dition du texte par David Wirmer montre qu\u2019il fut plusieurs fois r\u00e9vis\u00e9 et son int\u00e9r\u00eat est double. Il montre \u00e0 la fois quelle fut la doctrine du jeune Averro\u00e8s, disciple de son pr\u00e9d\u00e9cesseur andalou Ibn B\u0101\u011f\u011fa (Avempace), et comment le Cordouan inlassablement critique devait juger bon de la r\u00e9viser. Averro\u00e8s est connu dans l\u2019histoire comme l\u2019auteur du Grand Commentaire du trait\u00e9 De l\u2019\u00e2me. C\u2019est dans ce texte du Compendium qu\u2019on voit s\u2019en profiler la doctrine.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":2},{"id":140,"full_name":"David Wirmer","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5415,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin ","series":"Sic et Non","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["L\u2019intellect - Compendium du livre De l\u2019\u00e2me"]}
Title | Psychologie im katholischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus. Die Auseinandersetzung mit Averroes |
Type | Book Section |
Language | German |
Date | 2006 |
Published in | De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert |
Pages | 184 - 209 |
Categories | De anima, Psychology, Intellect, Renaissance |
Author(s) | Sascha Salatowsky |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5821","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5821,"authors_free":[{"id":6754,"entry_id":5821,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sascha Salatowsky","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Psychologie im katholischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus. Die Auseinandersetzung mit Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Psychologie im katholischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus. Die Auseinandersetzung mit Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2006","language":"German","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5821,"pubplace":"","publisher":"","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":{"id":5821,"section_of":5822,"pages":"184 - 209","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5822,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"de","title":"De Anima. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Psychologie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2006","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Aristoteles' De Anima ist einer der zentralen Texte der Philosophiegeschichte. Seine grundlegende Leistung liegt in der alle Lebewesen umfassenden ontologisch-ontischen Bestimmung der Seele und ihrer Verm\u00f6gen, einschlie\u00dflich der Lehre vom Geist (nous), deren n\u00e4here Explikation seit der Antike Anla\u00df zu vielf\u00e4ltigen Diskussionen gab.\r\nDie vorliegende Studie ermittelt unter R\u00fcckgriff auf die traditionellen Schulen des Alexandrismus, Neuplatonismus, Averroismus und Thomismus diejenigen mannigfaltigen philosophischen und theologischen Konstellationen des 16. und 17. Jh.s, die von innerkatholischen wie interkonfessionellen Auseinandersetzungen zwischen Katholiken, Lutheranern und Calvinisten gepr\u00e4gt waren. Unter diesem Gesichtspunkt werden die entsprechenden Werke der Reformatoren Luther und Melanchthon, der Renaissance-Aristoteliker Portio, Toletus, Zabarella und die Conimbrincenser sowie die hier erstmals ber\u00fccksichtigten Schriften der lutherischen und calvinistischen Schulphilosophen des 17. Jh.s.\u00a0interpretiert.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5822,"pubplace":"Amsterdam \/ Philadelphia","publisher":"Gr\u00fcner","series":"Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie","volume":"43","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6755,"entry_id":5822,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sascha Salatowsky","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Psychologie im katholischen Renaissance-Aristotelismus. Die Auseinandersetzung mit Averroes"]}