Title | Des remaniements dans une édition incunable des commentaires moyens d'Averroès sur la Logica Vetus |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 2000 |
Journal | Studia mediewistyczne |
Volume | 34–35 |
Pages | 93–99 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Roland Hissette |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"503","_score":null,"_source":{"id":503,"authors_free":[{"id":648,"entry_id":503,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":789,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roland Hissette","free_first_name":"Roland","free_last_name":"Hissette","norm_person":{"id":789,"first_name":"Roland","last_name":"Hissette","full_name":"Roland Hissette","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/151152527","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44447915","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd151152527.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roland Hissette"}}],"entry_title":"Des remaniements dans une \u00e9dition incunable des commentaires moyens d'Averro\u00e8s sur la Logica Vetus","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Des remaniements dans une \u00e9dition incunable des commentaires moyens d'Averro\u00e8s sur la Logica Vetus"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":789,"full_name":"Roland Hissette","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":503,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia mediewistyczne","volume":"34\u201335","issue":null,"pages":"93\u201399"}},"sort":[2000]}
Title | La démonstration du signe (burhān al-dalīl) selon Ibn Rushd (Averroès) |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 2000 |
Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
Volume | 11 |
Pages | 113–131 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"480","_score":null,"_source":{"id":480,"authors_free":[{"id":624,"entry_id":480,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"La d\u00e9monstration du signe (burh\u0101n al-dal\u012bl) selon Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La d\u00e9monstration du signe (burh\u0101n al-dal\u012bl) selon Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s)"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":480,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"11","issue":null,"pages":"113\u2013131"}},"sort":[2000]}
Title | Le mouvement et les catégories selon Avicenne et Averroès. L'arrière-fond grec et les prolongements latins médiévaux |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1998 |
Journal | Oriens-Occidens. Sciences, mathématiques et philosophie de l'Antiquité à l'Âge classique |
Volume | 2 |
Pages | 119–122 |
Categories | Physics, Logic |
Author(s) | Ahmad Hasnawi |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1052","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1052,"authors_free":[{"id":1223,"entry_id":1052,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":788,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","free_first_name":"Ahmad","free_last_name":"Hasnawi","norm_person":{"id":788,"first_name":"Ahmad","last_name":"Hasnawi","full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1011618869","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29672431","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ahmad Hasnawi"}}],"entry_title":"Le mouvement et les cat\u00e9gories selon Avicenne et Averro\u00e8s. L'arri\u00e8re-fond grec et les prolongements latins m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Le mouvement et les cat\u00e9gories selon Avicenne et Averro\u00e8s. L'arri\u00e8re-fond grec et les prolongements latins m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":788,"full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1052,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriens-Occidens. Sciences, math\u00e9matiques et philosophie de l'Antiquit\u00e9 \u00e0 l'\u00c2ge classique","volume":"2","issue":null,"pages":"119\u2013122"}},"sort":[1998]}
Title | Guillaume de Luna ou de Lunis ou Lunense. Un même traducteur d'Averroès et de traités d'al-Jabr |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1997 |
Journal | Bulletin de philosophie médiévale |
Volume | 39 |
Pages | 121–129 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Roland Hissette |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"501","_score":null,"_source":{"id":501,"authors_free":[{"id":646,"entry_id":501,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":789,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roland Hissette","free_first_name":"Roland","free_last_name":"Hissette","norm_person":{"id":789,"first_name":"Roland","last_name":"Hissette","full_name":"Roland Hissette","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/151152527","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44447915","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd151152527.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roland Hissette"}}],"entry_title":"Guillaume de Luna ou de Lunis ou Lunense. Un m\u00eame traducteur d'Averro\u00e8s et de trait\u00e9s d'al-Jabr","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Guillaume de Luna ou de Lunis ou Lunense. Un m\u00eame traducteur d'Averro\u00e8s et de trait\u00e9s d'al-Jabr"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":789,"full_name":"Roland Hissette","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":501,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"39","issue":null,"pages":"121\u2013129"}},"sort":[1997]}
Title | Les éditions anciennes de la traduction attribuée à Guillaume de Luna du commentaire moyen d'Averroès sur les Catégories |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1997 |
Journal | Bulletin de philosophie médiévale |
Volume | 39 |
Pages | 163–173 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Roland Hissette |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"502","_score":null,"_source":{"id":502,"authors_free":[{"id":647,"entry_id":502,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":789,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roland Hissette","free_first_name":"Roland","free_last_name":"Hissette","norm_person":{"id":789,"first_name":"Roland","last_name":"Hissette","full_name":"Roland Hissette","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/151152527","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44447915","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd151152527.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roland Hissette"}}],"entry_title":"Les \u00e9ditions anciennes de la traduction attribu\u00e9e \u00e0 Guillaume de Luna du commentaire moyen d'Averro\u00e8s sur les Cat\u00e9gories","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Les \u00e9ditions anciennes de la traduction attribu\u00e9e \u00e0 Guillaume de Luna du commentaire moyen d'Averro\u00e8s sur les Cat\u00e9gories"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":789,"full_name":"Roland Hissette","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":502,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"39","issue":null,"pages":"163\u2013173"}},"sort":[1997]}
Title | Averroes' Use of Examples in his Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics and Some Remarks on his Role as Commentator |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1997 |
Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
Volume | 7 |
Pages | 91–113 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Steven Harvey |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Averroes wrote three kinds of commentaries on the books of Aristotle - epitomes, middle commentaries, and long commentaries - and each kind had its own purposes. His aims may have also differed from text to text. That is, it seems reasonable to assume that he would stick closer to Aristotle in the logical works than, for example, in the metaphysical works. The present study investigates what may be called the “theological aspects” of Averroes' commentaries, and explores the commentary of Averroes that appears least likely to contain such elements, the Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics. The Prior Analytics is perhaps the most straightforward, even pedantic, of all of Aristotle's writings, and of Averroes' three kinds of commentaries, it is the middle commentaries which are least likely to diverge or digress from the text of Aristotle. The only trace of a religious hand in the commentary is Averroes' use of examples, and, in particular, examples that conclude that “the world is created” and the like. It is argued that Averroes chose these examples to show the traditionalist reading public the falsity of the theologians claims against the logic of the philosophers. The Appendix to the article shows that medieval commentators on Averroes' commentaries were also struck by his “creation of the world” examples. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"486","_score":null,"_source":{"id":486,"authors_free":[{"id":631,"entry_id":486,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":642,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steven Harvey","free_first_name":"Steven","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":642,"first_name":"Steven","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Steven Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051482674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97890242","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Steven Harvey"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes' Use of Examples in his Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics and Some Remarks on his Role as Commentator","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes' Use of Examples in his Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics and Some Remarks on his Role as Commentator"},"abstract":"Averroes wrote three kinds of commentaries on the books of Aristotle - epitomes, middle commentaries, and long commentaries - and each kind had its own purposes. His aims may have also differed from text to text. That is, it seems reasonable to assume that he would stick closer to Aristotle in the logical works than, for example, in the metaphysical works. The present study investigates what may be called the \u201ctheological aspects\u201d of Averroes' commentaries, and explores the commentary of Averroes that appears least likely to contain such elements, the Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics. The Prior Analytics is perhaps the most straightforward, even pedantic, of all of Aristotle's writings, and of Averroes' three kinds of commentaries, it is the middle commentaries which are least likely to diverge or digress from the text of Aristotle. The only trace of a religious hand in the commentary is Averroes' use of examples, and, in particular, examples that conclude that \u201cthe world is created\u201d and the like. It is argued that Averroes chose these examples to show the traditionalist reading public the falsity of the theologians claims against the logic of the philosophers. The Appendix to the article shows that medieval commentators on Averroes' commentaries were also struck by his \u201ccreation of the world\u201d examples.","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":642,"full_name":"Steven Harvey","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":486,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"7","issue":null,"pages":"91\u2013113"}},"sort":[1997]}
Title | Ghazālī and Averroes on Meaning |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1996 |
Journal | Al-Masāq. Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean |
Volume | 9 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 179–189 |
Categories | Logic, al-Ġazālī |
Author(s) | Oliver Leaman |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"515","_score":null,"_source":{"id":515,"authors_free":[{"id":660,"entry_id":515,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":672,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Oliver Leaman","free_first_name":"Oliver","free_last_name":"Leaman","norm_person":{"id":672,"first_name":"Oliver","last_name":"Leaman","full_name":"Oliver Leaman","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129119792","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54188412","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Oliver Leaman"}}],"entry_title":"Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":672,"full_name":"Oliver Leaman","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":515,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Mas\u0101q. Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":"9","issue":"1","pages":"179\u2013189"}},"sort":[1996]}
Title | حق النظر في المبادئ الأولى بين الفلسفة والعلم عند ابن رشد |
Transcription | Ḥaqq al-naẓar fī l-mabādiʾ al-ʾūlā bayna l-falsafa wa-l-ʿilm ʿinda Ibn Rušd |
Translation | The Right to First Principles Between Philosophy and Science According to Ibn Rushd |
Type | Article |
Language | Arabic |
Date | 1996 |
Journal | Alif. Journal of Comparative Poetics |
Volume | 16 |
Pages | 52–76 |
Categories | Logic, Metaphysics, Science |
Author(s) | Muḥammad al- Maṣbāḥī |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1619","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1619,"authors_free":[{"id":1859,"entry_id":1619,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":836,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mu\u1e25ammad al- Ma\u1e63b\u0101\u1e25\u012b","free_first_name":"Mu\u1e25ammad al-","free_last_name":"Ma\u1e63b\u0101\u1e25\u012b","norm_person":{"id":836,"first_name":"Mu\u1e25ammad al-","last_name":"Mi\u1e63b\u0101\u1e25\u012b","full_name":"Mu\u1e25ammad al- Mi\u1e63b\u0101\u1e25\u012b","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130370649","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/42087861","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mu\u1e25ammad al- Mi\u1e63b\u0101\u1e25\u012b"}}],"entry_title":"\u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0638\u0631 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u062f\u0626 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0645 \u0639\u0646\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f","title_transcript":"\u1e24aqq al-na\u1e93ar f\u012b l-mab\u0101di\u02be al-\u02be\u016bl\u0101 bayna l-falsafa wa-l-\u02bfilm \u02bfinda Ibn Ru\u0161d","title_translation":"The Right to First Principles Between Philosophy and Science According to Ibn Rushd","main_title":{"title":"\u062d\u0642 \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0638\u0631 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0628\u0627\u062f\u0626 \u0627\u0644\u0623\u0648\u0644\u0649 \u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0641\u0644\u0633\u0641\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0645 \u0639\u0646\u062f \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"Arabic","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":56,"category_name":"Science","link":"bib?categories[]=Science"}],"authors":[{"id":836,"full_name":"Mu\u1e25ammad al- Mi\u1e63b\u0101\u1e25\u012b","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1619,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Alif. Journal of Comparative Poetics","volume":"16","issue":null,"pages":"52\u201376"}},"sort":[1996]}
Title | Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1995 |
Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
Volume | 5 |
Pages | 51–74 |
Categories | Logic, Alexander of Aphrodisias, al-Fārābī, Aristotle, Commentary |
Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Ibn Rušd devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26–30). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-Fārābī and Alexander, on the basis of al-Fārābī's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-Fārābī's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5–20). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"479","_score":null,"_source":{"id":479,"authors_free":[{"id":623,"entry_id":479,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"},"abstract":"Ibn Ru\u0161d devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26\u201330). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Alexander, on the basis of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5\u201320). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":479,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"51\u201374"}},"sort":[1995]}
Title | Über das Nomen und andere Gegenstände |
Type | Article |
Language | German |
Date | 1994 |
Journal | Zeitschrift für Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften |
Volume | 9 |
Pages | 293–325 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Egbert Meyer |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"519","_score":null,"_source":{"id":519,"authors_free":[{"id":664,"entry_id":519,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":796,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Egbert Meyer","free_first_name":"Egbert","free_last_name":"Meyer","norm_person":{"id":796,"first_name":"Egbert","last_name":"Meyer","full_name":"Egbert Meyer","short_ident":"EgbMey","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Egbert Meyer"}}],"entry_title":"\u00dcber das Nomen und andere Gegenst\u00e4nde","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"\u00dcber das Nomen und andere Gegenst\u00e4nde"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1994","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":796,"full_name":"Egbert Meyer","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":519,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Geschichte der arabisch-islamischen Wissenschaften","volume":"9","issue":null,"pages":"293\u2013325"}},"sort":[1994]}
Title | Averroes über die Definition des Partikularen |
Type | Article |
Language | German |
Date | 1994 |
Journal | Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft |
Volume | 144 |
Pages | 28–32 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Egbert Meyer |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43378657 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"518","_score":null,"_source":{"id":518,"authors_free":[{"id":663,"entry_id":518,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":796,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Egbert Meyer","free_first_name":"Egbert","free_last_name":"Meyer","norm_person":{"id":796,"first_name":"Egbert","last_name":"Meyer","full_name":"Egbert Meyer","short_ident":"EgbMey","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Egbert Meyer"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes \u00fcber die Definition des Partikularen","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes \u00fcber die Definition des Partikularen"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1994","language":"German","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43378657","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":796,"full_name":"Egbert Meyer","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":518,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenl\u00e4ndischen Gesellschaft","volume":"144","issue":null,"pages":"28\u201332"}},"sort":["Averroes \u00fcber die Definition des Partikularen"]}
Title | Averroes' Use of Examples in his Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics and Some Remarks on his Role as Commentator |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1997 |
Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
Volume | 7 |
Pages | 91–113 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Steven Harvey |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Averroes wrote three kinds of commentaries on the books of Aristotle - epitomes, middle commentaries, and long commentaries - and each kind had its own purposes. His aims may have also differed from text to text. That is, it seems reasonable to assume that he would stick closer to Aristotle in the logical works than, for example, in the metaphysical works. The present study investigates what may be called the “theological aspects” of Averroes' commentaries, and explores the commentary of Averroes that appears least likely to contain such elements, the Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics. The Prior Analytics is perhaps the most straightforward, even pedantic, of all of Aristotle's writings, and of Averroes' three kinds of commentaries, it is the middle commentaries which are least likely to diverge or digress from the text of Aristotle. The only trace of a religious hand in the commentary is Averroes' use of examples, and, in particular, examples that conclude that “the world is created” and the like. It is argued that Averroes chose these examples to show the traditionalist reading public the falsity of the theologians claims against the logic of the philosophers. The Appendix to the article shows that medieval commentators on Averroes' commentaries were also struck by his “creation of the world” examples. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"486","_score":null,"_source":{"id":486,"authors_free":[{"id":631,"entry_id":486,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":642,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steven Harvey","free_first_name":"Steven","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":642,"first_name":"Steven","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Steven Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051482674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97890242","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Steven Harvey"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes' Use of Examples in his Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics and Some Remarks on his Role as Commentator","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes' Use of Examples in his Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics and Some Remarks on his Role as Commentator"},"abstract":"Averroes wrote three kinds of commentaries on the books of Aristotle - epitomes, middle commentaries, and long commentaries - and each kind had its own purposes. His aims may have also differed from text to text. That is, it seems reasonable to assume that he would stick closer to Aristotle in the logical works than, for example, in the metaphysical works. The present study investigates what may be called the \u201ctheological aspects\u201d of Averroes' commentaries, and explores the commentary of Averroes that appears least likely to contain such elements, the Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics. The Prior Analytics is perhaps the most straightforward, even pedantic, of all of Aristotle's writings, and of Averroes' three kinds of commentaries, it is the middle commentaries which are least likely to diverge or digress from the text of Aristotle. The only trace of a religious hand in the commentary is Averroes' use of examples, and, in particular, examples that conclude that \u201cthe world is created\u201d and the like. It is argued that Averroes chose these examples to show the traditionalist reading public the falsity of the theologians claims against the logic of the philosophers. The Appendix to the article shows that medieval commentators on Averroes' commentaries were also struck by his \u201ccreation of the world\u201d examples.","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":642,"full_name":"Steven Harvey","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":486,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"7","issue":null,"pages":"91\u2013113"}},"sort":["Averroes' Use of Examples in his Middle Commentary on the Prior Analytics and Some Remarks on his Role as Commentator"]}
Title | Des anomalies dans l'enchaînement des textes d'Averroès à ceux de Boèce dans le ms. Berkeley Univ. Calif. Bancroft (UCB) 60 |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1992 |
Journal | Bulletin de philosophie médiévale |
Volume | 34 |
Pages | 155–162 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Roland Hissette |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"497","_score":null,"_source":{"id":497,"authors_free":[{"id":642,"entry_id":497,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":789,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roland Hissette","free_first_name":"Roland","free_last_name":"Hissette","norm_person":{"id":789,"first_name":"Roland","last_name":"Hissette","full_name":"Roland Hissette","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/151152527","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44447915","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd151152527.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roland Hissette"}}],"entry_title":"Des anomalies dans l'encha\u00eenement des textes d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 ceux de Bo\u00e8ce dans le ms. Berkeley Univ. Calif. Bancroft (UCB) 60","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Des anomalies dans l'encha\u00eenement des textes d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 ceux de Bo\u00e8ce dans le ms. Berkeley Univ. Calif. Bancroft (UCB) 60"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1992","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":789,"full_name":"Roland Hissette","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":497,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"34","issue":null,"pages":"155\u2013162"}},"sort":["Des anomalies dans l'encha\u00eenement des textes d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 ceux de Bo\u00e8ce dans le ms. Berkeley Univ. Calif. Bancroft (UCB) 60"]}
Title | Des remaniements dans une édition incunable des commentaires moyens d'Averroès sur la Logica Vetus |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 2000 |
Journal | Studia mediewistyczne |
Volume | 34–35 |
Pages | 93–99 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Roland Hissette |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"503","_score":null,"_source":{"id":503,"authors_free":[{"id":648,"entry_id":503,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":789,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roland Hissette","free_first_name":"Roland","free_last_name":"Hissette","norm_person":{"id":789,"first_name":"Roland","last_name":"Hissette","full_name":"Roland Hissette","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/151152527","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44447915","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd151152527.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roland Hissette"}}],"entry_title":"Des remaniements dans une \u00e9dition incunable des commentaires moyens d'Averro\u00e8s sur la Logica Vetus","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Des remaniements dans une \u00e9dition incunable des commentaires moyens d'Averro\u00e8s sur la Logica Vetus"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":789,"full_name":"Roland Hissette","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":503,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia mediewistyczne","volume":"34\u201335","issue":null,"pages":"93\u201399"}},"sort":["Des remaniements dans une \u00e9dition incunable des commentaires moyens d'Averro\u00e8s sur la Logica Vetus"]}
Title | Ghazālī and Averroes on Meaning |
Type | Article |
Language | English |
Date | 1996 |
Journal | Al-Masāq. Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean |
Volume | 9 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 179–189 |
Categories | Logic, al-Ġazālī |
Author(s) | Oliver Leaman |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"515","_score":null,"_source":{"id":515,"authors_free":[{"id":660,"entry_id":515,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":672,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Oliver Leaman","free_first_name":"Oliver","free_last_name":"Leaman","norm_person":{"id":672,"first_name":"Oliver","last_name":"Leaman","full_name":"Oliver Leaman","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129119792","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54188412","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Oliver Leaman"}}],"entry_title":"Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":672,"full_name":"Oliver Leaman","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":515,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Mas\u0101q. Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":"9","issue":"1","pages":"179\u2013189"}},"sort":["Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning"]}
Title | Guillaume de Luna ou de Lunis ou Lunense. Un même traducteur d'Averroès et de traités d'al-Jabr |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1997 |
Journal | Bulletin de philosophie médiévale |
Volume | 39 |
Pages | 121–129 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Roland Hissette |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"501","_score":null,"_source":{"id":501,"authors_free":[{"id":646,"entry_id":501,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":789,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roland Hissette","free_first_name":"Roland","free_last_name":"Hissette","norm_person":{"id":789,"first_name":"Roland","last_name":"Hissette","full_name":"Roland Hissette","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/151152527","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44447915","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd151152527.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roland Hissette"}}],"entry_title":"Guillaume de Luna ou de Lunis ou Lunense. Un m\u00eame traducteur d'Averro\u00e8s et de trait\u00e9s d'al-Jabr","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Guillaume de Luna ou de Lunis ou Lunense. Un m\u00eame traducteur d'Averro\u00e8s et de trait\u00e9s d'al-Jabr"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":789,"full_name":"Roland Hissette","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":501,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"39","issue":null,"pages":"121\u2013129"}},"sort":["Guillaume de Luna ou de Lunis ou Lunense. Un m\u00eame traducteur d'Averro\u00e8s et de trait\u00e9s d'al-Jabr"]}
Title | Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1995 |
Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
Volume | 5 |
Pages | 51–74 |
Categories | Logic, Alexander of Aphrodisias, al-Fārābī, Aristotle, Commentary |
Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Ibn Rušd devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26–30). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-Fārābī and Alexander, on the basis of al-Fārābī's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-Fārābī's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5–20). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"479","_score":null,"_source":{"id":479,"authors_free":[{"id":623,"entry_id":479,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"},"abstract":"Ibn Ru\u0161d devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26\u201330). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Alexander, on the basis of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5\u201320). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":479,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"51\u201374"}},"sort":["Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"]}
Title | L'unité codicologique des commentaires d'Averroès sur la Logica Vetus dans le manuscrit Erfurt, Ampl. Fol. 318 |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1991 |
Journal | Bulletin de philosophie médiévale |
Volume | 33 |
Pages | 148–154 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Roland Hissette |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"495","_score":null,"_source":{"id":495,"authors_free":[{"id":640,"entry_id":495,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":789,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Roland Hissette","free_first_name":"Roland","free_last_name":"Hissette","norm_person":{"id":789,"first_name":"Roland","last_name":"Hissette","full_name":"Roland Hissette","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/151152527","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44447915","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd151152527.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Roland Hissette"}}],"entry_title":"L'unit\u00e9 codicologique des commentaires d'Averro\u00e8s sur la Logica Vetus dans le manuscrit Erfurt, Ampl. Fol. 318","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"L'unit\u00e9 codicologique des commentaires d'Averro\u00e8s sur la Logica Vetus dans le manuscrit Erfurt, Ampl. Fol. 318"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1991","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":789,"full_name":"Roland Hissette","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":495,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"33","issue":null,"pages":"148\u2013154"}},"sort":["L'unit\u00e9 codicologique des commentaires d'Averro\u00e8s sur la Logica Vetus dans le manuscrit Erfurt, Ampl. Fol. 318"]}
Title | La démonstration du signe (burhān al-dalīl) selon Ibn Rushd (Averroès) |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 2000 |
Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
Volume | 11 |
Pages | 113–131 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"480","_score":null,"_source":{"id":480,"authors_free":[{"id":624,"entry_id":480,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"La d\u00e9monstration du signe (burh\u0101n al-dal\u012bl) selon Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La d\u00e9monstration du signe (burh\u0101n al-dal\u012bl) selon Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s)"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":480,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"11","issue":null,"pages":"113\u2013131"}},"sort":["La d\u00e9monstration du signe (burh\u0101n al-dal\u012bl) selon Ibn Rushd (Averro\u00e8s)"]}
Title | Le mouvement et les catégories selon Avicenne et Averroès. L'arrière-fond grec et les prolongements latins médiévaux |
Type | Article |
Language | French |
Date | 1998 |
Journal | Oriens-Occidens. Sciences, mathématiques et philosophie de l'Antiquité à l'Âge classique |
Volume | 2 |
Pages | 119–122 |
Categories | Physics, Logic |
Author(s) | Ahmad Hasnawi |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1052","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1052,"authors_free":[{"id":1223,"entry_id":1052,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":788,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","free_first_name":"Ahmad","free_last_name":"Hasnawi","norm_person":{"id":788,"first_name":"Ahmad","last_name":"Hasnawi","full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1011618869","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29672431","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ahmad Hasnawi"}}],"entry_title":"Le mouvement et les cat\u00e9gories selon Avicenne et Averro\u00e8s. L'arri\u00e8re-fond grec et les prolongements latins m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Le mouvement et les cat\u00e9gories selon Avicenne et Averro\u00e8s. L'arri\u00e8re-fond grec et les prolongements latins m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":788,"full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1052,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriens-Occidens. Sciences, math\u00e9matiques et philosophie de l'Antiquit\u00e9 \u00e0 l'\u00c2ge classique","volume":"2","issue":null,"pages":"119\u2013122"}},"sort":["Le mouvement et les cat\u00e9gories selon Avicenne et Averro\u00e8s. L'arri\u00e8re-fond grec et les prolongements latins m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux"]}