| Title | Aristotle and Averroes on Coming-to-be and Passing-away |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Oriens |
| Volume | 35 |
| Pages | 1–34 |
| Categories | Natural Philosophy, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Josep Puig Montada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"711","_score":null,"_source":{"id":711,"authors_free":[{"id":869,"entry_id":711,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle and Averroes on Coming-to-be and Passing-away","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle and Averroes on Coming-to-be and Passing-away"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":711,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriens","volume":"35","issue":null,"pages":"1\u201334"}},"sort":[1996]}
| Title | The Early Stages in the Evolution of Gersonides' "The Wars of the Lord" |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | The Jewish Quarterly Review |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue | 1/2 |
| Pages | 1-46 |
| Categories | Cosmology, Aristotle, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Ruth Glasner |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/1455215 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2307/1455215 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5735","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5735,"authors_free":[{"id":6642,"entry_id":5735,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":737,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ruth Glasner","free_first_name":"Ruth ","free_last_name":"Glasner","norm_person":{"id":737,"first_name":"Ruth","last_name":"Glasner","full_name":"Ruth Glasner","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/138576793","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/46394953","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ruth Glasner"}}],"entry_title":"The Early Stages in the Evolution of Gersonides' \"The Wars of the Lord\"","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Early Stages in the Evolution of Gersonides' \"The Wars of the Lord\""},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/1455215","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1455215","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":737,"full_name":"Ruth Glasner","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5735,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","volume":"87","issue":"1\/2","pages":"1-46"}},"sort":[1996]}
| Title | Borges, Averroes, Aristotle: the poetics of poetics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Hispania |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 201-207 |
| Categories | Borges, Aristotle, Poetics |
| Author(s) | Daniel Balderston |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/344881 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2307/344881 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5523","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5523,"authors_free":[{"id":6412,"entry_id":5523,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1835,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Daniel Balderston","free_first_name":"Daniel ","free_last_name":"Balderston","norm_person":{"id":1835,"first_name":"Daniel ","last_name":"Balderston","full_name":"Daniel Balderston ","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131879502","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Daniel Balderston "}}],"entry_title":"Borges, Averroes, Aristotle: the poetics of poetics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Borges, Averroes, Aristotle: the poetics of poetics"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/344881","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/344881","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":34,"category_name":"Borges","link":"bib?categories[]=Borges"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"}],"authors":[{"id":1835,"full_name":"Daniel Balderston ","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5523,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hispania","volume":"79","issue":" 2","pages":"201-207"}},"sort":[1996]}
| Title | El concepto de naturaleza en los comentarios de Averroes y Tomás de Aquino al Corpus Aristotelicum |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 1996 |
| Published in | Actes del Simposi Internacional de Filosofia de l'Edat Mitjana. El pensament antropològic medieval en els àmbits islàmic, hebreu i cristià. Vic-Girona 11–16 d'abril de 1993 |
| Pages | 100–111 |
| Categories | Natural Philosophy, Aquinas, Aristotle, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Alfonso García Marqués , M. Ballester |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"681","_score":null,"_source":{"id":681,"authors_free":[{"id":835,"entry_id":681,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":822,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alfonso Garc\u00eda Marqu\u00e9s","free_first_name":"Alfonso","free_last_name":"Garc\u00eda Marqu\u00e9s","norm_person":{"id":822,"first_name":"Alfonso","last_name":"Garc\u00eda Marqu\u00e9s","full_name":"Alfonso Garc\u00eda Marqu\u00e9s","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/151533393","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/68966116","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alfonso Garc\u00eda Marqu\u00e9s"}},{"id":836,"entry_id":681,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":899,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"M. Ballester","free_first_name":"M.","free_last_name":"Ballester","norm_person":{"id":899,"first_name":"M.","last_name":"Ballester","full_name":"M. Ballester","short_ident":"MBal","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=M. Ballester"}}],"entry_title":"El concepto de naturaleza en los comentarios de Averroes y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino al Corpus Aristotelicum","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"El concepto de naturaleza en los comentarios de Averroes y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino al Corpus Aristotelicum"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"1996","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":822,"full_name":"Alfonso Garc\u00eda Marqu\u00e9s","role":1},{"id":899,"full_name":"M. Ballester","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":681,"section_of":69,"pages":"100\u2013111","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":69,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Actes del Simposi Internacional de Filosofia de l'Edat Mitjana. El pensament antropol\u00f2gic medieval en els \u00e0mbits isl\u00e0mic, hebreu i cristi\u00e0. Vic-Girona 11\u201316 d'abril de 1993","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"1996","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1996","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":69,"pubplace":"Vic","publisher":"Patronat d'Estudis Osonencs","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[1996]}
| Title | Averroes' De caelo. Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in his Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 9–49 |
| Categories | Cosmology, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Gerhard Endress |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes defended philosophy by returning to the true Aristotle. For this purpose, Aristotle's book “On the Heaven,” in which he explained the eternity, uniqueness and movement of the universe, occupied a place of special importance. But the Aristotelian philosopher had a hard time holding his own in the face of contradictions within the book and with respect to Aristotle's later works. In his early Compendium, later Paraphrase, and final Long Commentary of De Caelo, Ibn Rushd continued the efforts of the Hellenistic commentators in order to integrate all the elements of his doctrine into a unified system, to harmonize his early cosmology with his later Metaphysics - the early doctrine of natural movement of the elements, and of the self-moving star-souls (a Platonic element), with the doctrine of potency and actuality and the theory of the First Mover - and to uphold his models of homocentric planetary spheres against the mathematical paradigm of Ptolemaic astronomy. By insisting throughout on demonstrative arguments based on rational principles, he asserted the philosophers' claim to irrefutable truth. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"420","_score":null,"_source":{"id":420,"authors_free":[{"id":562,"entry_id":420,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":203,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gerhard Endress","free_first_name":"Gerhard","free_last_name":"Endress","norm_person":{"id":203,"first_name":"Gerhard","last_name":"Endress","full_name":"Gerhard Endress","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/115696954","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/82748395","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd115696954.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gerhard Endress"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes' De caelo. Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in his Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes' De caelo. Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in his Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens"},"abstract":"Averroes defended philosophy by returning to the true Aristotle. For this purpose, Aristotle's book \u201cOn the Heaven,\u201d in which he explained the eternity, uniqueness and movement of the universe, occupied a place of special importance. But the Aristotelian philosopher had a hard time holding his own in the face of contradictions within the book and with respect to Aristotle's later works. In his early Compendium, later Paraphrase, and final Long Commentary of De Caelo, Ibn Rushd continued the efforts of the Hellenistic commentators in order to integrate all the elements of his doctrine into a unified system, to harmonize his early cosmology with his later Metaphysics - the early doctrine of natural movement of the elements, and of the self-moving star-souls (a Platonic element), with the doctrine of potency and actuality and the theory of the First Mover - and to uphold his models of homocentric planetary spheres against the mathematical paradigm of Ptolemaic astronomy. By insisting throughout on demonstrative arguments based on rational principles, he asserted the philosophers' claim to irrefutable truth.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":203,"full_name":"Gerhard Endress","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":420,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"9\u201349"}},"sort":[1995]}
| Title | A propos de fondamental et de l'essentiel dans le commentaire d'Averroès sur la Métaphysique d'Aristote |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Revue de philosophie ancienne |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 225–238 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Laurence Bauloye |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"545","_score":null,"_source":{"id":545,"authors_free":[{"id":692,"entry_id":545,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":814,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laurence Bauloye","free_first_name":"Laurence","free_last_name":"Bauloye","norm_person":{"id":814,"first_name":"Laurence","last_name":"Bauloye","full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/152664165","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59337898","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laurence Bauloye"}}],"entry_title":"A propos de fondamental et de l'essentiel dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la M\u00e9taphysique d'Aristote","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A propos de fondamental et de l'essentiel dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la M\u00e9taphysique d'Aristote"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":814,"full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":545,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue de philosophie ancienne","volume":"13","issue":null,"pages":"225\u2013238"}},"sort":[1995]}
| Title | Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 51–74 |
| Categories | Logic, Alexander of Aphrodisias, al-Fārābī, Aristotle, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rušd devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26–30). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-Fārābī and Alexander, on the basis of al-Fārābī's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-Fārābī's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5–20). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"479","_score":null,"_source":{"id":479,"authors_free":[{"id":623,"entry_id":479,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"},"abstract":"Ibn Ru\u0161d devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26\u201330). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Alexander, on the basis of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5\u201320). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":479,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"51\u201374"}},"sort":[1995]}
| Title | The problem of the rational soul in the thirteenth century |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1995 |
| Publication Place | Leiden; New York; Köln |
| Publisher | E.J. Brill |
| Series | Brill's studies in intellectual history |
| Volume | 65 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Aristotle, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Dales |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Problem of the Rational Soul in the Thirteenth Century traces the Latin scholastics' attempt to deal with two essentially incompatible notions of the human soul: the scientific view of Aristotle which considers it to be a form, and the Augustinian view of the soul as a substance in its own right, from Gundissalinus to the Parisian condemnation of 1277. It traces the growing disarray of Latin notions of the soul, the growth of the monopsychism controversy, the solutions of Bonaventure and Aquinas, through the variety of responses to Aquinas's De unitate intellectus. Among its conclusions are that the traditional dualism diminished with time, that there was little agreement among the “heterodox Aristotelians,” and that, with two exceptions, no one in the thirteenth century taught the present position of the Catholic Church, that the rational soul is infused at conception. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5514","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5514,"authors_free":[{"id":6393,"entry_id":5514,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":517,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Dales","free_first_name":"Richard C. ","free_last_name":" Dales","norm_person":{"id":517,"first_name":"Richard Clark","last_name":"Dales","full_name":"Richard Clark Dales","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119288427","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/62355098","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd119288427.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard Clark Dales"}}],"entry_title":"The problem of the rational soul in the thirteenth century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The problem of the rational soul in the thirteenth century"},"abstract":"The Problem of the Rational Soul in the Thirteenth Century traces the Latin scholastics' attempt to deal with two essentially incompatible notions of the human soul: the scientific view of Aristotle which considers it to be a form, and the Augustinian view of the soul as a substance in its own right, from Gundissalinus to the Parisian condemnation of 1277. It traces the growing disarray of Latin notions of the soul, the growth of the monopsychism controversy, the solutions of Bonaventure and Aquinas, through the variety of responses to Aquinas's De unitate intellectus. Among its conclusions are that the traditional dualism diminished with time, that there was little agreement among the \u201cheterodox Aristotelians,\u201d and that, with two exceptions, no one in the thirteenth century taught the present position of the Catholic Church, that the rational soul is infused at conception.","btype":1,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004247192","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":517,"full_name":"Richard Clark Dales","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5514,"pubplace":"Leiden; New York; K\u00f6ln","publisher":"E.J. Brill","series":"Brill's studies in intellectual history ","volume":"65","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[1995]}
| Title | À propos du "fondamental" et de "l'essentiel" dans le commentaire d'Averroès sur la "métaphysique" d'Aristote |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Revue de Philosophie Ancienne |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 225-238 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Laurence Bauloye |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24354593 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5729","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5729,"authors_free":[{"id":6637,"entry_id":5729,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":814,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laurence Bauloye","free_first_name":"Laurence ","free_last_name":"Bauloye","norm_person":{"id":814,"first_name":"Laurence","last_name":"Bauloye","full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/152664165","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59337898","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laurence Bauloye"}}],"entry_title":"\u00c0 propos du \"fondamental\" et de \"l'essentiel\" dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la \"m\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"\u00c0 propos du \"fondamental\" et de \"l'essentiel\" dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la \"m\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24354593","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":814,"full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5729,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue de Philosophie Ancienne","volume":"13","issue":"2","pages":"225-238"}},"sort":[1995]}
| Title | Averroes' De Caelo Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in his Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 9 - 49 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, De caelo, Cosmology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Gerhard Endress |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes defended philosophy by returning to the true Aristotle. For this purpose, Aristotle's book “On the Heaven,” in which he explained the eternity, uniqueness and movement of the universe, occupied a place of special importance. But the Aristotelian philosopher had a hard time holding his own in the face of contradictions within the book and with respect to Aristotle's later works. In his early Compendium, later Paraphrase, and final Long Commentary of De Caelo, Ibn Rushd continued the efforts of the Hellenistic commentators in order to integrate all the elements of his doctrine into a unified system, to harmonize his early cosmology with his later Metaphysics – the early doctrine of natural movement of the elements, and of the self-moving star-souls (a Platonic element), with the doctrine of potency and actuality and the theory of the First Mover – and to uphold his models of homocentric planetary spheres against the mathematical paradigm of Ptolemaic astronomy. By insisting throughout on demonstrative arguments based on rational principles, he asserted the philosophers' claim to irrefutable truth. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5787","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5787,"authors_free":[{"id":6702,"entry_id":5787,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":203,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gerhard Endress","free_first_name":"Gerhard ","free_last_name":"Endress","norm_person":{"id":203,"first_name":"Gerhard","last_name":"Endress","full_name":"Gerhard Endress","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/115696954","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/82748395","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd115696954.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gerhard Endress"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes' De Caelo Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in his Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes' De Caelo Ibn Rushd's Cosmology in his Commentaries on Aristotle's On the Heavens"},"abstract":"Averroes defended philosophy by returning to the true Aristotle. For this purpose, Aristotle's book \u201cOn the Heaven,\u201d in which he explained the eternity, uniqueness and movement of the universe, occupied a place of special importance. But the Aristotelian philosopher had a hard time holding his own in the face of contradictions within the book and with respect to Aristotle's later works. In his early Compendium, later Paraphrase, and final Long Commentary of De Caelo, Ibn Rushd continued the efforts of the Hellenistic commentators in order to integrate all the elements of his doctrine into a unified system, to harmonize his early cosmology with his later Metaphysics \u2013 the early doctrine of natural movement of the elements, and of the self-moving star-souls (a Platonic element), with the doctrine of potency and actuality and the theory of the First Mover \u2013 and to uphold his models of homocentric planetary spheres against the mathematical paradigm of Ptolemaic astronomy. By insisting throughout on demonstrative arguments based on rational principles, he asserted the philosophers' claim to irrefutable truth.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0957423900001934","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":66,"category_name":"De caelo","link":"bib?categories[]=De caelo"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":203,"full_name":"Gerhard Endress","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5787,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":"1","pages":"9 - 49"}},"sort":[1995]}
| Title | Ernest Bloch y el averroísmo de su Avicena y la izquierda aristotélica |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 1999 |
| Published in | Averroes y los averroísmos. Actas del III Congreso nacional de filosofía medieval |
| Pages | 371–385 |
| Categories | Modern Readings, Avicenna, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo , Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1275","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1275,"authors_free":[{"id":1463,"entry_id":1275,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1227,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo","free_first_name":"Josep Manuel","free_last_name":"Udina I. Cobo","norm_person":{"id":1227,"first_name":"Josep Manuel","last_name":"Udina I. Cobo","full_name":"Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/107018299","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo"}},{"id":1464,"entry_id":1275,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1227,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo","free_first_name":"Josep Manuel","free_last_name":"Udina I. Cobo","norm_person":{"id":1227,"first_name":"Josep Manuel","last_name":"Udina I. Cobo","full_name":"Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/107018299","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo"}}],"entry_title":"Ernest Bloch y el averro\u00edsmo de su Avicena y la izquierda aristot\u00e9lica","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ernest Bloch y el averro\u00edsmo de su Avicena y la izquierda aristot\u00e9lica"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"1999","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1227,"full_name":"Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo","role":1},{"id":1227,"full_name":"Josep Manuel Udina I. Cobo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1275,"section_of":122,"pages":"371\u2013385","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":122,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Averroes y los averro\u00edsmos. Actas del III Congreso nacional de filosof\u00eda medieval","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"1999","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1999","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":122,"pubplace":"Saragossa","publisher":"Sociedad de Filosof\u00eda Medieval","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Ernest Bloch y el averro\u00edsmo de su Avicena y la izquierda aristot\u00e9lica"]}
| Title | Etude du livre zay (dzêta) de la "Métaphysique" d'Aristote dans sa version arabe et son commentaire par Averroès |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1994 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Université I, Pantheon-Sorbonne |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi , Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"555","_score":null,"_source":{"id":555,"authors_free":[{"id":703,"entry_id":555,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":821,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi","free_first_name":"Ahmed Nabil","free_last_name":"Elsakhawi","norm_person":{"id":821,"first_name":"Ahmed Nabil","last_name":"Elsakhawi","full_name":"Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29268765","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi"}},{"id":704,"entry_id":555,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":821,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi","free_first_name":"Ahmed Nabil","free_last_name":"Elsakhawi","norm_person":{"id":821,"first_name":"Ahmed Nabil","last_name":"Elsakhawi","full_name":"Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29268765","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi"}}],"entry_title":"Etude du livre zay (dz\u00eata) de la \"M\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote dans sa version arabe et son commentaire par Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Etude du livre zay (dz\u00eata) de la \"M\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote dans sa version arabe et son commentaire par Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1994","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":821,"full_name":"Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi","role":1},{"id":821,"full_name":"Ahmed Nabil Elsakhawi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":555,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Universit\u00e9 I, Pantheon-Sorbonne","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Etude du livre zay (dz\u00eata) de la \"M\u00e9taphysique\" d'Aristote dans sa version arabe et son commentaire par Averro\u00e8s"]}
| Title | Grand commentaire sur le traité de l'Ame d'Aristote |
| Translation | al-Sharh ̣al-kabīr li-kitāb al-nafs li-Aristụ̄ |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | Latin |
| Date | 1998 |
| Publication Place | Carthage |
| Publisher | Académie tunisienne des sciences des lettres et des arts, "Beït al-Hikma" |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, De anima |
| Author(s) | Averroes , F. Stuart Crawford , Ibrāhīm Gharbī |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5784","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5784,"authors_free":[{"id":6697,"entry_id":5784,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":6698,"entry_id":5784,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1533,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"F. Stuart Crawford","free_first_name":"F. Stuart ","free_last_name":"Crawford","norm_person":{"id":1533,"first_name":"Stuart F.","last_name":"Crawford","full_name":"Stuart F. Crawford","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1065915632","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/17304195","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Stuart F. Crawford"}},{"id":6699,"entry_id":5784,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1386,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Ibra\u0304hi\u0304m Gharbi\u0304","free_first_name":"Ibra\u0304hi\u0304m ","free_last_name":"Gharbi\u0304","norm_person":{"id":1386,"first_name":"Ibrahim","last_name":"Al-Gharbi","full_name":"Ibrahim Al-Gharbi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/11937926","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ibrahim Al-Gharbi"}}],"entry_title":"Grand commentaire sur le traite\u0301 de l'Ame d'Aristote ","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"al-Sharh \u0323al-kabi\u0304r li-kita\u0304b al-nafs li-Aristu\u0323\u0304","main_title":{"title":"Grand commentaire sur le traite\u0301 de l'Ame d'Aristote "},"abstract":"","btype":1,"date":"1998","language":"Latin","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":1533,"full_name":"Stuart F. Crawford","role":2},{"id":1386,"full_name":"Ibrahim Al-Gharbi","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5784,"pubplace":"Carthage","publisher":" Acade\u0301mie tunisienne des sciences des lettres et des arts, \"Bei\u0308t al-Hikma\"","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Grand commentaire sur le traite\u0301 de l'Ame d'Aristote "]}
| Title | Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 51–74 |
| Categories | Logic, Alexander of Aphrodisias, al-Fārābī, Aristotle, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rušd devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26–30). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-Fārābī and Alexander, on the basis of al-Fārābī's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-Fārābī's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5–20). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"479","_score":null,"_source":{"id":479,"authors_free":[{"id":623,"entry_id":479,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"},"abstract":"Ibn Ru\u0161d devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26\u201330). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Alexander, on the basis of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5\u201320). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":479,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"51\u201374"}},"sort":["Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"]}
| Title | L'intelligence et la pensée. Grand commentaire du De anima, III. Traduction, introduction et notes par Alain de Libera |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1998 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Flammarion |
| Categories | Psychology, Commentary, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Averroes , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | Alain de Libera |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1464","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1464,"authors_free":[{"id":1671,"entry_id":1464,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":1672,"entry_id":1464,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":647,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Alain de Libera","free_first_name":"Alain de","free_last_name":"Libera","norm_person":{"id":647,"first_name":"Alain de","last_name":"Libera","full_name":"Alain de Libera","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130219002","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/98388541","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd130219002.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alain de Libera"}}],"entry_title":"L'intelligence et la pens\u00e9e. Grand commentaire du De anima, III. Traduction, introduction et notes par Alain de Libera","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"L'intelligence et la pens\u00e9e. Grand commentaire du De anima, III. Traduction, introduction et notes par Alain de Libera"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1998","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[{"id":68,"aw_title":"Long Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1464,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Flammarion","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["L'intelligence et la pens\u00e9e. Grand commentaire du De anima, III. Traduction, introduction et notes par Alain de Libera"]}
| Title | La question de l'essence. Averroès et Thomas d'Aquin, Commentateurs d'Aristote, Métaphysique Z1 |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1997 |
| Publication Place | Louvain-la-Neuve |
| Publisher | Éditions Peeters |
| Series | Aristote |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Aristotle, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Laurence Bauloye |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"546","_score":null,"_source":{"id":546,"authors_free":[{"id":693,"entry_id":546,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":814,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laurence Bauloye","free_first_name":"Laurence","free_last_name":"Bauloye","norm_person":{"id":814,"first_name":"Laurence","last_name":"Bauloye","full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/152664165","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59337898","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laurence Bauloye"}}],"entry_title":"La question de l'essence. Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin, Commentateurs d'Aristote, M\u00e9taphysique Z1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La question de l'essence. Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin, Commentateurs d'Aristote, M\u00e9taphysique Z1"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1997","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":814,"full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":546,"pubplace":"Louvain-la-Neuve","publisher":"\u00c9ditions Peeters","series":"Aristote","volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["La question de l'essence. Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin, Commentateurs d'Aristote, M\u00e9taphysique Z1"]}
| Title | Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800–1200) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1998 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Neurosciences |
| Volume | 7 |
| Pages | 174–185 |
| Categories | Medicine, Galen, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Axel Karenberg , Irmgard Hort |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"531","_score":null,"_source":{"id":531,"authors_free":[{"id":677,"entry_id":531,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":806,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Axel Karenberg","free_first_name":"Axel","free_last_name":"Karenberg","norm_person":{"id":806,"first_name":"Axel","last_name":"Karenberg","full_name":"Axel Karenberg","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129591378","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/70013349","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Axel Karenberg"}},{"id":678,"entry_id":531,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":807,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Irmgard Hort","free_first_name":"Irmgard","free_last_name":"Hort","norm_person":{"id":807,"first_name":"Irmgard","last_name":"Hort","full_name":"Irmgard Hort","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111835852","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/62185524","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Irmgard Hort"}}],"entry_title":"Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800\u20131200)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800\u20131200)"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":806,"full_name":"Axel Karenberg","role":1},{"id":807,"full_name":"Irmgard Hort","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":531,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Neurosciences","volume":"7","issue":null,"pages":"174\u2013185"}},"sort":["Medieval Descriptions and Doctrines of Stroke. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Part II: Between Galenism and Aristotelism. Preliminary Analysis of Select Sources. Islamic Theories of Apoplexy (800\u20131200)"]}
| Title | Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1992 |
| Journal | Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum |
| Volume | 31 |
| Pages | 61–118 |
| Categories | Ethics, Commentary, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Jerzy B. Korolec |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"441","_score":null,"_source":{"id":441,"authors_free":[{"id":584,"entry_id":441,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":751,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jerzy B. Korolec","free_first_name":"Jerzy B.","free_last_name":"Korolec","norm_person":{"id":751,"first_name":"Jerzy B.","last_name":"Korolec","full_name":"Jerzy B. Korolec","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154973629","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/40859886","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jerzy B. Korolec"}}],"entry_title":"Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1992","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":751,"full_name":"Jerzy B. Korolec","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":441,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum","volume":"31","issue":null,"pages":"61\u2013118"}},"sort":["Mittlerer Kommentar von Averroes zur Nikomachischen Ethik des Aristoteles"]}
| Title | Modal Logic and the Theory of Modality in Gersonides |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1993 |
| Journal | Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly |
| Volume | 42 |
| Pages | 347-381 |
| Categories | Logic, Gersonides, Aristotle, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Charles H. Manekin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23350774 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5727","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5727,"authors_free":[{"id":6635,"entry_id":5727,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":679,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles H. Manekin","free_first_name":"Charles H. ","free_last_name":"Manekin","norm_person":{"id":679,"first_name":"Charles H.","last_name":"Manekin","full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133803554","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/112521012","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles H. Manekin"}}],"entry_title":"Modal Logic and the Theory of Modality in Gersonides","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Modal Logic and the Theory of Modality in Gersonides"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1993","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23350774","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":679,"full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5727,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly","volume":"42","issue":"","pages":"347-381"}},"sort":["Modal Logic and the Theory of Modality in Gersonides"]}
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/41963598 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5736","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5736,"authors_free":[{"id":6643,"entry_id":5736,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rega Wood","free_first_name":"Rega ","free_last_name":"Wood","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Roger Bacon: Richard Rufus' Successor as a Parisian Physics Professor","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Roger Bacon: Richard Rufus' Successor as a Parisian Physics Professor"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/41963598","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5736,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vivarium","volume":"35","issue":"2","pages":" 222-250"}},"sort":["Roger Bacon: Richard Rufus' Successor as a Parisian Physics Professor"]}