| Title | Vérité et validité d’Averroès à l’aristotélisme renaissant |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 83–92 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Tradition and Reception, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Ali Benmakhlouf |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| La théorie de la « double-vérité » fut un immense contresens apposé par Thomas d’Aquin sur l’oeuvre d’Averroès dans laquelle elle ne se trouve pas. Le présent article déplace les enjeux vers la notion de validité en explorant la double stratégie qui se met en place chez Averroès : 1) montrer que la sagesse (ḥikma) dont parle le Coran est la philosophie la plus haute, celle qui fait usage de la démonstration ; 2) promouvoir la démonstration comme outil de validité du savoir. L’auteur rappelle le moment inaugural d’al-Kindī, qui met en place la démarche scientifique et s’intéresse donc à la validité et à la forme des arguments, avant de se concentrer sur Averroès et la mise en cohérence du vrai et du valide qui s’opère dans le Discours Décisif. L’article s’achève sur les prolongements de la question de la validité à la Renaissance. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/543 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5037","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5037,"authors_free":[{"id":5784,"entry_id":5037,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":774,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","free_first_name":"Ali","free_last_name":"Benmakhlouf","norm_person":{"id":774,"first_name":"Ali","last_name":"Benmakhlouf","full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120589850","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24737587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ali Benmakhlouf"}}],"entry_title":"V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et validit\u00e9 d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 l\u2019aristot\u00e9lisme renaissant","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et validit\u00e9 d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 l\u2019aristot\u00e9lisme renaissant"},"abstract":"La th\u00e9orie de la \u00ab double-v\u00e9rit\u00e9 \u00bb fut un immense contresens appos\u00e9 par Thomas d\u2019Aquin sur l\u2019oeuvre d\u2019Averro\u00e8s dans laquelle elle ne se trouve pas. Le pr\u00e9sent article d\u00e9place les enjeux vers la notion de validit\u00e9 en explorant la double strat\u00e9gie qui se met en place chez Averro\u00e8s : 1) montrer que la sagesse (\u1e25ikma) dont parle le Coran est la philosophie la plus haute, celle qui fait usage de la d\u00e9monstration ; 2) promouvoir la d\u00e9monstration comme outil de validit\u00e9 du savoir. L\u2019auteur rappelle le moment inaugural d\u2019al-Kind\u012b, qui met en place la d\u00e9marche scientifique et s\u2019int\u00e9resse donc \u00e0 la validit\u00e9 et \u00e0 la forme des arguments, avant de se concentrer sur Averro\u00e8s et la mise en coh\u00e9rence du vrai et du valide qui s\u2019op\u00e8re dans le Discours D\u00e9cisif. L\u2019article s\u2019ach\u00e8ve sur les prolongements de la question de la validit\u00e9 \u00e0 la Renaissance.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/543","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":774,"full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5037,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"83\u201392"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Akılsal Zorunluluk ve Dinî Meşruiyet Bağlamında İbn Rüşd’ün Felsefe Savunusu |
| Translation | The Defense of Philosophy According to Averroes in the Context of Rational Necessity and Religious Legitimacy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Turkish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi |
| Volume | 9 (İDEKTA) |
| Pages | 131-139 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Rafiz Manafov , Adem Akman |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| İbn Rüşd İslam düşüncesinin akli temellerinin ve felsefi düşüncenin gerilemeye yüz tuttuğu bir dönemin filozofudur. O, felsefi açıdan dinin konumunu gerekli gördüğü kadar, din açısından da felsefenin kaçınılmazlığına inanır. Çalışmamızın özünü ve amacını İbn Rüşd’ün felsefesindeki temel kavram ve düşünceler oluşturmaktadır. Makalede felsefenin İbn Rüşd açısından akli zorunluluk ve dinsel meşruiyeti sorgulanmakta, felsefi ve dini veriler ışığında değerlendirilmektedir. Dinsel veriler ve rasyonel gereklilik bağlamında İbn Rüşd’ün felsefe savunusunun özellikleri ortaya konmakta ve önemi vurgulanmaktadır. Averroes is a philosopher of an era in which the rational foundations of Islamic thought weakening, and the philosophical mind was on the verge of decline. He regards the position of religion as possible and necessary in terms of philosophy, he sees philosophical activity necessary in terms of religion. The purpose and essence of our study based on the main principles and defenses of philosophy of Averroes. It discusses the rational necessity and religious legitimacy of philosophy in the context of Averroes’ defense of philosophy. It focuses on importance of philosophy in the eyes of Averroes and how he legitimize philosophy in terms of religion. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5578","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5578,"authors_free":[{"id":6474,"entry_id":5578,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rafiz Manafov","free_first_name":"Rafiz ","free_last_name":"Manafov","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6475,"entry_id":5578,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Adem Akman","free_first_name":"Adem ","free_last_name":"Akman","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Ak\u0131lsal Zorunluluk ve Din\u00ee Me\u015fruiyet Ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Felsefe Savunusu","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The Defense of Philosophy According to Averroes in the Context of Rational Necessity and Religious Legitimacy","main_title":{"title":"Ak\u0131lsal Zorunluluk ve Din\u00ee Me\u015fruiyet Ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Felsefe Savunusu"},"abstract":"\u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd \u0130slam d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinin akli temellerinin ve felsefi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin gerilemeye y\u00fcz tuttu\u011fu bir d\u00f6nemin filozofudur. O, felsefi a\u00e7\u0131dan dinin konumunu gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kadar, din a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da felsefenin ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na inan\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fmam\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc ve amac\u0131n\u0131 \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn felsefesindeki temel kavram ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceler olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Makalede felsefenin \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan akli zorunluluk ve dinsel me\u015fruiyeti sorgulanmakta, felsefi ve dini veriler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmektedir. Dinsel veriler ve rasyonel gereklilik ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn felsefe savunusunun \u00f6zellikleri ortaya konmakta ve \u00f6nemi vurgulanmaktad\u0131r.\r\n\r\nAverroes is a philosopher of an era in which the rational foundations of Islamic thought weakening, and the philosophical mind was on the verge of decline. He regards the position of religion as possible and necessary in terms of philosophy, he sees philosophical activity necessary in terms of religion. The purpose and essence of our study based on the main principles and defenses of philosophy of Averroes. It discusses the rational necessity and religious legitimacy of philosophy in the context of Averroes\u2019 defense of philosophy. It focuses on importance of philosophy in the eyes of Averroes and how he legitimize philosophy in terms of religion.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Turkish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18506\/anemon.906725","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5578,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anemon Mu\u015f Alparslan \u00dcniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi ","volume":" 9 (\u0130DEKTA)","issue":"","pages":"131-139"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | İbn Rüşd’ün Tanrı’ya cevher demesinin neden ve sonuçları |
| Translation | The reasons for and the consequences of Averroes’ saying essence to God |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Turkish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Turkish Academic Research Review |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1035-1052 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Cosmology |
| Author(s) | Fevzi Yiğit |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Bu makalede, İbn Rüşd’ün Tanrı’ya cevher demesinin görece neden ve sonuçları konu edilmektedir. Böylece İbn Rüşd örneğinden hareketle, filozofların Tanrı telakkilerinin aslında metafiziğin konusuyla doğrudan bağlantılı olduğu gösterilmek istenmektedir. Makalede bilkuvve-bilfiil, cevher-araz, varlık-mâhiyet, madde-sûret ve teşkîk gibi güçlü felsefî ayrımlara ihtiyaç duyuldukça başvurulacaktır. İbn Rüşd’e göre mevcut/var olan araştırması temelde bir cevher araştırmasıdır. Mevcut kavramı cevherin üstünde yer alan daha üst bir varlık seviyesini temsil etmese de kapsamının genişliği yüzünden cevherden daha üst bir kavramdır. Oysaki İbn Sînâ’ya göre mevcut, cevherden daha üst bir varlık seviyesini karşılar ve bu yüzden mevcut araştırması sadece cevher araştırmasına hasredilemez. Dolayısıyla ona göre metafiziğin konusu cevher olması açısından cevher değildir. İbn Rüşd’ün Tanrı’ya cevher demesinin muhtemel nedenleri şunlardır: Birincisi, Tanrı bütün mevcudat içerisinde cevher tanımına en uygun olandır. İkincisi onun mevcut kavramını -diğer anlamlarını akılda tutmak kaydıyla- dış dünyada gerçekliği olmayan zihinsel bir kavram yani cins olarak kabul etmesi dolayısıyla sadece cevhere gerçeklik tanımış olmasıdır. Üçüncüsü, göksel cisimlerin sonsuz bir biçimde hareket ettiği düşüncesidir. Dördüncüsü tümeller ve ayrık mevcutlar ile hissedilir ferdi cevherler arasındaki ilişkiye dair görüşüdür. İbn Rüşd Aristoteles’i takiben tümellerin ve ideaların ferdi cevherlerin varoluşunda katkısı olmadığını düşünür. İbn Rüşd’ün Tanrı’ya cevher demesinin muhtemel sonuçlarıysa şunlardır: Birincisi onun din felsefe ilişkisine dair yazdığı Faslü’l-makâl ve el-Keşf an menâhicü’ledille kitaplarında Tanrı hakkında takındığı Hanbeli tavırdır. İkincisi aslında yukarıda sebep olarak zikredilen burada ise sonuç olarak dile getirilebilecek döngüsel bir şeydir. Yani gök cisimleri ve âlemi ezeli olarak kabul etmek Tanrı’ya cevher denmesine sebep olurken Tanrı’ya cevher denmesi de âlemin Tanrı’nın etkisiyle ancak O’ndan ayrı ve kopuk olarak mevcut olması fikrini sonuç vermektedir. Üçüncüsü sudûr ve yoktan yaratma doktrinlerini reddetmesidir. Yoktan yaratmayı reddi ise -antik filozofların da açıkça dile getirdiği üzere- “salt yokluğun varlığın kaynağı olamayacağı “şeklindeki genel bir ontolojik ilkeye dayanmaktadır. This article deals with the relative reasons and consequences of Averroes’ saying God the essence. Thus, based on the example of Averroes, it is desired to show that the philosophers’ conception of God is actually directly related to the subject of metaphysics. The distinctions between potential and actual, being-essence and matter-form, which are thought to have strong forms of explanation, will be applied when needed. According to Averroes, his research of being is basically an investigation of essence. Although the concept of being/existence does not represent a higher level of being above the substance, it takes place in metaphysics as a higher concept with different meanings. However, according to Ibn Avicenna, the existing meets a higher level of being than the substance, and therefore its inquiry cannot be only the one for substance. Therefore, according to him, the subject of metaphysics is not a substance qua substance. In short, the possible reasons for Averroes to call God essence are as follows: First, God is the most suitable for the definition of essence in all existence. The second is that, keeping other meanings of being in mind, he accepted the concept of “mawjūd” as a mental concept that has no reality in the external world, that is, as a genus, and therefore only recognized the substance as reality. The third is the idea that the celestial bodies move endlessly. The fourth is his view on the relationship between universals and discrete entities and tangible individual essences. Following Aristotle, Averroes thinks that universals and ideas do not contribute to the existence of individual essences. The possible consequences of Averroes’ calling God a substance are as follows: The first is his Hanbalī attitude towards God in his books Fasl al-maqāl and al-Kashf an manāhij al-adilla, which he wrote on the relationship between religion and philosophy. Secondly, what was mentioned above as a cause, is a cyclical thing that can be expressed as a result here. In other words, while accepting the celestial bodies and the universe as eternal, causes God to be called essence, calling God essence results in the idea that the universe exists only apart and disconnected from him under the influence of God. The third is his rejection of the doctrines of creation out of nothing and sudūr (emanation). The refusal to create out of nothing is based on a general ontological principle -as the ancient philosophers openly expressed- “absolute absence cannot be the source of existence”. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5582","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5582,"authors_free":[{"id":6480,"entry_id":5582,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fevzi Yi\u011fit","free_first_name":"Fevzi","free_last_name":"Yi\u011fit","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"\u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin neden ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The reasons for and the consequences of Averroes\u2019 saying essence to God","main_title":{"title":"\u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin neden ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131"},"abstract":"Bu makalede, \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin g\u00f6rece neden ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 konu edilmektedir. B\u00f6ylece \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd \u00f6rne\u011finden hareketle, filozoflar\u0131n Tanr\u0131 telakkilerinin asl\u0131nda metafizi\u011fin konusuyla do\u011frudan ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6sterilmek istenmektedir. Makalede bilkuvve-bilfiil, cevher-araz, varl\u0131k-m\u00e2hiyet, madde-s\u00fbret ve te\u015fk\u00eek gibi g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc felsef\u00ee ayr\u0131mlara ihtiya\u00e7 duyulduk\u00e7a ba\u015fvurulacakt\u0131r. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019e g\u00f6re mevcut\/var olan ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 temelde bir cevher ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131d\u0131r. Mevcut kavram\u0131 cevherin \u00fcst\u00fcnde yer alan daha \u00fcst bir varl\u0131k seviyesini temsil etmese de kapsam\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fli\u011fi y\u00fcz\u00fcnden cevherden daha \u00fcst bir kavramd\u0131r. Oysaki \u0130bn S\u00een\u00e2\u2019ya g\u00f6re mevcut, cevherden daha \u00fcst bir varl\u0131k seviyesini kar\u015f\u0131lar ve bu y\u00fczden mevcut ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 sadece cevher ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131na hasredilemez. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ona g\u00f6re metafizi\u011fin konusu cevher olmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan cevher de\u011fildir. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin muhtemel nedenleri \u015funlard\u0131r: Birincisi, Tanr\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn mevcudat i\u00e7erisinde cevher tan\u0131m\u0131na en uygun oland\u0131r. \u0130kincisi onun mevcut kavram\u0131n\u0131 -di\u011fer anlamlar\u0131n\u0131 ak\u0131lda tutmak kayd\u0131yla- d\u0131\u015f d\u00fcnyada ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi olmayan zihinsel bir kavram yani cins olarak kabul etmesi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla sadece cevhere ger\u00e7eklik tan\u0131m\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc, g\u00f6ksel cisimlerin sonsuz bir bi\u00e7imde hareket etti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesidir. D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc t\u00fcmeller ve ayr\u0131k mevcutlar ile hissedilir ferdi cevherler aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiye dair g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcd\u00fcr. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd Aristoteles\u2019i takiben t\u00fcmellerin ve idealar\u0131n ferdi cevherlerin varolu\u015funda katk\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcr. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin muhtemel sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ysa \u015funlard\u0131r: Birincisi onun din felsefe ili\u015fkisine dair yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 Fasl\u00fc\u2019l-mak\u00e2l ve el-Ke\u015ff an men\u00e2hic\u00fc\u2019ledille kitaplar\u0131nda Tanr\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tak\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 Hanbeli tav\u0131rd\u0131r. \u0130kincisi asl\u0131nda yukar\u0131da sebep olarak zikredilen burada ise sonu\u00e7 olarak dile getirilebilecek d\u00f6ng\u00fcsel bir \u015feydir. Yani g\u00f6k cisimleri ve \u00e2lemi ezeli olarak kabul etmek Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher denmesine sebep olurken Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher denmesi de \u00e2lemin Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n etkisiyle ancak O\u2019ndan ayr\u0131 ve kopuk olarak mevcut olmas\u0131 fikrini sonu\u00e7 vermektedir. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc sud\u00fbr ve yoktan yaratma doktrinlerini reddetmesidir. Yoktan yaratmay\u0131 reddi ise -antik filozoflar\u0131n da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dile getirdi\u011fi \u00fczere- \u201csalt yoklu\u011fun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n kayna\u011f\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131 \u201c\u015feklindeki genel bir ontolojik ilkeye dayanmaktad\u0131r.\r\n \r\nThis article deals with the relative reasons and consequences of Averroes\u2019 saying God the essence. Thus, based on the example of Averroes, it is desired to show that the philosophers\u2019 conception of God is actually directly related to the subject of metaphysics. The distinctions between potential and actual, being-essence and matter-form, which are thought to have strong forms of explanation, will be applied when needed. According to Averroes, his research of being is basically an investigation of essence. Although the concept of being\/existence does not represent a higher level of being above the substance, it takes place in metaphysics as a higher concept with different meanings. However, according to Ibn Avicenna, the existing meets a higher level of being than the substance, and therefore its inquiry cannot be only the one for substance. Therefore, according to him, the subject of metaphysics is not a substance qua substance. In short, the possible reasons for Averroes to call God essence are as follows: First, God is the most suitable for the definition of essence in all existence. The second is that, keeping other meanings of being in mind, he accepted the concept of \u201cmawj\u016bd\u201d as a mental concept that has no reality in the external world, that is, as a genus, and therefore only recognized the substance as reality. The third is the idea that the celestial bodies move endlessly. The fourth is his view on the relationship between universals and discrete entities and tangible individual essences. Following Aristotle, Averroes thinks that universals and ideas do not contribute to the existence of individual essences. The possible consequences of Averroes\u2019 calling God a substance are as follows: The first is his Hanbal\u012b attitude towards God in his books Fasl al-maq\u0101l and al-Kashf an man\u0101hij al-adilla, which he wrote on the relationship between religion and philosophy. Secondly, what was mentioned above as a cause, is a cyclical thing that can be expressed as a result here. In other words, while accepting the celestial bodies and the universe as eternal, causes God to be called essence, calling God essence results in the idea that the universe exists only apart and disconnected from him under the influence of God. The third is his rejection of the doctrines of creation out of nothing and sud\u016br (emanation). The refusal to create out of nothing is based on a general ontological principle -as the ancient philosophers openly expressed- \u201cabsolute absence cannot be the source of existence\u201d.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Turkish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/20.500.11787\/6522","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5582,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Turkish Academic Research Review","volume":"6","issue":"3","pages":"1035-1052"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Philosophy and the Metaphorical Interpretation of Religious Texts in Averroes, Maimonides, and Aquinas |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 627–647 |
| Categories | Maimonides, Thomas, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5102","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5102,"authors_free":[{"id":5876,"entry_id":5102,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1602,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","free_first_name":"Francisco J. ","free_last_name":"Romero Carrasquillo","norm_person":{"id":1602,"first_name":"Francisco J.","last_name":"Romero Carrasquillo","full_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051112966","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/64147423039444880878","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo"}}],"entry_title":"Philosophy and the Metaphorical Interpretation of Religious Texts in Averroes, Maimonides, and Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy and the Metaphorical Interpretation of Religious Texts in Averroes, Maimonides, and Aquinas"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12314","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1602,"full_name":"Francisco J. Romero Carrasquillo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5102,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"627\u2013647"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–27 |
| Categories | Law, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Theology, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Karen Taliaferro |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article traces a Muslim tradition of natural law in the thought of Ibn Rushd. I argue that this notion of natural law enriches the concept of law and can mediate conflicts of human law and divine law in Islam. I discuss the ontology, then epistemology, of Ibn Rushd’s natural law, then situate the resultant conception of law within Islamic legal and theological contexts. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5198","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5198,"authors_free":[{"id":5989,"entry_id":5198,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Karen Taliaferro","free_first_name":"Karen","free_last_name":"Taliaferro","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law"},"abstract":"This article traces a Muslim tradition of natural law in the thought of Ibn Rushd. I argue that this notion of natural law enriches the concept of law and can mediate conflicts of human law and divine law in Islam. I discuss the ontology, then epistemology, of Ibn Rushd\u2019s natural law, then situate the resultant conception of law within Islamic legal and theological contexts.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jis\/etw045","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5198,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":" 28","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201327 "}},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | El filósofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo islámico de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Al-Qantara |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–68 |
| Categories | Law, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Diego R. Sarrió |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El presente artículo argumenta que por debajo del marco jurídico del Faṣl al-maqāl subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la razón con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliación en la aceptación de una teoría hermenéutica según la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano según su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el artículo sugiere que Averroes concibió la filosofía en términos cuasi religiosos, como la obra más noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los legítimos «herederos de los profetas». |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5289","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5289,"authors_free":[{"id":6108,"entry_id":5289,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Diego R. Sarri\u00f3","free_first_name":"Diego R.,","free_last_name":"Sarri\u00f3","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes"},"abstract":"El presente art\u00edculo argumenta que por debajo del marco jur\u00eddico del Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la raz\u00f3n con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliaci\u00f3n en la aceptaci\u00f3n de una teor\u00eda hermen\u00e9utica seg\u00fan la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano seg\u00fan su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el art\u00edculo sugiere que Averroes concibi\u00f3 la filosof\u00eda en t\u00e9rminos cuasi religiosos, como la obra m\u00e1s noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los leg\u00edtimos \u00abherederos de los profetas\u00bb.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/alqantara.2015.002 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5289,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qantara","volume":"36","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201368"}},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | Qur'anic Interpretation and the Problem of Literalism: Ibn Rushd and the Enlightenment Project in the Islamic World |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Religions |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1082–1106 |
| Categories | Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Chryssi Sidiropoulou |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5103","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5103,"authors_free":[{"id":5877,"entry_id":5103,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1323,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","free_first_name":"Chryssi","free_last_name":"Sidiropoulou","norm_person":{"id":1323,"first_name":"Chryssi","last_name":"Sidiropoulou","full_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","short_ident":"ChrSid","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Chryssi Sidiropoulou"}}],"entry_title":"Qur'anic Interpretation and the Problem of Literalism: Ibn Rushd and the Enlightenment Project in the Islamic World","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Qur'anic Interpretation and the Problem of Literalism: Ibn Rushd and the Enlightenment Project in the Islamic World"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.3390\/rel6031082","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1323,"full_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5103,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Religions","volume":"6","issue":"3","pages":"1082\u20131106"}},"sort":[2015]}
| Title | Un riadattamento ebraico del Fasl al-maqâl di Averroè: la Behinat ha-dat di Elia del Medigo |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Schede Medievali |
| Volume | 52 |
| Pages | 239–254 |
| Categories | Jewish Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Giovanni Licata |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5288","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5288,"authors_free":[{"id":6107,"entry_id":5288,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1599,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giovanni Licata","free_first_name":"Giovanni","free_last_name":"Licata","norm_person":{"id":1599,"first_name":"Giovanni","last_name":"Licata","full_name":"Giovanni Licata","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1128655918","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/306437659","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Giovanni Licata"}}],"entry_title":"Un riadattamento ebraico del Fasl al-maq\u00e2l di Averro\u00e8: la Behinat ha-dat di Elia del Medigo","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Un riadattamento ebraico del Fasl al-maq\u00e2l di Averro\u00e8: la Behinat ha-dat di Elia del Medigo"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":8,"category_name":"Jewish Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Jewish Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1599,"full_name":"Giovanni Licata","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5288,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Schede Medievali","volume":"52","issue":"","pages":"239\u2013254"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del "faṣl al-maqāl" de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Estudios de Asia y Africa |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | Nr. 1 (153) |
| Pages | 99-133 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Epistemology |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relación entre filosofía y religión. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Faṣl al-maqāl. En este artículo propondré una ruta de interpretación ligeramente distinta de la que otros intérpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendré que puede ser leído como un tratado de argumentación donde Averroes se ocupa no únicamente de mostrar la armonía entre la ley religiosa y la filosofía, sino también de esbozar una teoría de la argumentación sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epistémico de las creencias religiosas. A controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Faṣl al-maqāl. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24368078 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5583","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5583,"authors_free":[{"id":6481,"entry_id":5583,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1339,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavie","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1339,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15784577X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/73173132","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Razones y argumentos: Una relectura del \"fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l\" de Averroes"},"abstract":"Un tema controvertido en el pensamiento de Averroes es la relaci\u00f3n entre filosof\u00eda y religi\u00f3n. Averroes se ocupa de ella de manera sumamente original en el Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. En este art\u00edculo propondr\u00e9 una ruta de interpretaci\u00f3n ligeramente distinta de la que otros int\u00e9rpretes de este tratado han aportado. Sostendr\u00e9 que puede ser le\u00eddo como un tratado de argumentaci\u00f3n donde Averroes se ocupa no \u00fanicamente de mostrar la armon\u00eda entre la ley religiosa y la filosof\u00eda, sino tambi\u00e9n de esbozar una teor\u00eda de la argumentaci\u00f3n sumamente flexible que le sirve para definir el estatuto epist\u00e9mico de las creencias religiosas. \r\n\r\nA controversial matter in Averroes' thought is the relationship between philosophy and religion. Averroes deals with this issue in an original fashion within the text of Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l. In this paper I propose a slightly different interpretation from that of other interpreters of this treatise. I argue that it can be read as a treatise on argumentation where Averroes not only proves the harmony between religious law and philosophy, but also outlines an extremely flexible theory of argumentation which serves to define the epistemic status of religious beliefs.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"Spanish","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24368078","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"}],"authors":[{"id":1339,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5583,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Estudios de Asia y Africa","volume":"49","issue":"Nr. 1 (153)","pages":"99-133"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | Averroes y su uso de aleyas coránicas |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2013 |
| Journal | SVMMA, Revista de Cultures Medievals |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 12-22 |
| Categories | Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Josep Puig Montada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El artículo considera el uso que hace Averroes de las citas coránicas en sus obras, y establece diferentes categorías. En la primera se encuentra su obra teológica cuyo título se puede traducir como Los métodos de las pruebas en las doctrinas de la religión, donde las aleyas son la base de estas doctrinas. A la segunda pertenece su comentario medio a la Retórica donde el Corán es citado por ser un modelo literario. La tercera situación es ante todo la de su obra “Tratado definitivo”, la cual tiene forma de dictamen jurídico (fatwâ). La última situación es la de obras filosóficas donde Averroes cita aleyas coránicas para su interpretación de Aristóteles. The article considers how Averroes makes use of Quranic verses in his works and classifies them into different categories. His theological treatise, that can be translated as Disclosure of the Proof Methods Concerning the Principles of Religion, based on Quranic verses, belongs to the first category. Averroes middle commentary on the Aristotelian Rhetoric belongs to the second, in which the Qur’an is quoted as a literary paradigm. In the third category we find his ‘Definitive Treatise’, written in the form of a fatwā or legal response. His philosophical works belong to the last category, in which Averroes makes use of Quranic verses to buttress his interpretation of Aristotle. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5593","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5593,"authors_free":[{"id":6492,"entry_id":5593,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep Puig ","free_last_name":" Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes y su uso de aleyas cor\u00e1nicas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes y su uso de aleyas cor\u00e1nicas"},"abstract":"El art\u00edculo considera el uso que hace Averroes de las citas cor\u00e1nicas en sus obras, y establece diferentes categor\u00edas. En la primera se encuentra su obra teol\u00f3gica cuyo t\u00edtulo se puede traducir como Los m\u00e9todos de las pruebas en las doctrinas de la religi\u00f3n, donde las aleyas son la base de estas doctrinas. A la segunda pertenece su comentario medio a la Ret\u00f3rica donde el Cor\u00e1n es citado por ser un modelo literario. La tercera situaci\u00f3n es ante todo la de su obra \u201cTratado definitivo\u201d, la cual tiene forma de dictamen jur\u00eddico (fatw\u00e2). La \u00faltima situaci\u00f3n es la de obras filos\u00f3ficas donde Averroes cita aleyas cor\u00e1nicas para su interpretaci\u00f3n de Arist\u00f3teles.\r\n\r\nThe article considers how Averroes makes use of Quranic verses in his works and classifies them into different categories. His theological treatise, that can be translated as Disclosure of the Proof Methods Concerning the Principles of Religion, based on Quranic verses, belongs to the first category. Averroes middle commentary on the Aristotelian Rhetoric belongs to the second, in which the Qur\u2019an is quoted as a literary paradigm. In the third category we find his \u2018Definitive Treatise\u2019, written in the form of a fatw\u0101 or legal response. His philosophical works belong to the last category, in which Averroes makes use of Quranic verses to buttress his interpretation of Aristotle.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5593,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"SVMMA, Revista de Cultures Medievals","volume":"1","issue":"1","pages":"12-22"}},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | El filósofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo islámico de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Al-Qantara |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–68 |
| Categories | Law, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Diego R. Sarrió |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El presente artículo argumenta que por debajo del marco jurídico del Faṣl al-maqāl subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la razón con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliación en la aceptación de una teoría hermenéutica según la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano según su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el artículo sugiere que Averroes concibió la filosofía en términos cuasi religiosos, como la obra más noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los legítimos «herederos de los profetas». |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5289","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5289,"authors_free":[{"id":6108,"entry_id":5289,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Diego R. Sarri\u00f3","free_first_name":"Diego R.,","free_last_name":"Sarri\u00f3","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes"},"abstract":"El presente art\u00edculo argumenta que por debajo del marco jur\u00eddico del Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l subyace el deseo de conciliar los requerimientos de la raz\u00f3n con las exigencias de la fe. Averroes basa tal conciliaci\u00f3n en la aceptaci\u00f3n de una teor\u00eda hermen\u00e9utica seg\u00fan la cual, la Palabra Divina se dirige a cada ser humano seg\u00fan su capacidad intelectual. Por consiguiente, Averroes no excluye a los sabios del deber religioso de asentir a la verdad revelada. Contrariamente a interpretaciones exageradamente secularizadoras de su racionalismo, el art\u00edculo sugiere que Averroes concibi\u00f3 la filosof\u00eda en t\u00e9rminos cuasi religiosos, como la obra m\u00e1s noble que se puede llevar a cabo en presencia de Dios, cuyo ejercicio convierte a sus practicantes en los leg\u00edtimos \u00abherederos de los profetas\u00bb.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/alqantara.2015.002 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5289,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qantara","volume":"36","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201368"}},"sort":["El fil\u00f3sofo como heredero de los profetas: el racionalismo isl\u00e1mico de Averroes"]}
| Title | Ethics in Medieval Islamic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1983 |
| Journal | Journal of Religious Ethics |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 224–239 |
| Categories | Ethics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Politics |
| Author(s) | Charles E. Butterworth |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40017707 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"436","_score":null,"_source":{"id":436,"authors_free":[{"id":579,"entry_id":436,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":123,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","free_first_name":"Charles E.","free_last_name":"Butterworth","norm_person":{"id":123,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105338856X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/41853950","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles E. Butterworth"}}],"entry_title":"Ethics in Medieval Islamic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ethics in Medieval Islamic Philosophy"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1983","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/40017707","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":123,"full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":436,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Religious Ethics","volume":"11","issue":null,"pages":"224\u2013239"}},"sort":["Ethics in Medieval Islamic Philosophy"]}
| Title | Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averroès et Thomas d'Aquin |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2002 |
| Journal | Studi Medievali |
| Volume | 43 |
| Pages | 833–856 |
| Categories | Thomas, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Alain de Libera |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1548","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1548,"authors_free":[{"id":1777,"entry_id":1548,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":647,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alain de Libera","free_first_name":"Alain de","free_last_name":"Libera","norm_person":{"id":647,"first_name":"Alain de","last_name":"Libera","full_name":"Alain de Libera","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130219002","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/98388541","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd130219002.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alain de Libera"}}],"entry_title":"Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":647,"full_name":"Alain de Libera","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1548,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studi Medievali","volume":"43","issue":null,"pages":"833\u2013856"}},"sort":["Foi et raison. Philosophie et religion selon Averro\u00e8s et Thomas d'Aquin"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–27 |
| Categories | Law, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Theology, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Karen Taliaferro |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article traces a Muslim tradition of natural law in the thought of Ibn Rushd. I argue that this notion of natural law enriches the concept of law and can mediate conflicts of human law and divine law in Islam. I discuss the ontology, then epistemology, of Ibn Rushd’s natural law, then situate the resultant conception of law within Islamic legal and theological contexts. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5198","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5198,"authors_free":[{"id":5989,"entry_id":5198,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Karen Taliaferro","free_first_name":"Karen","free_last_name":"Taliaferro","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law"},"abstract":"This article traces a Muslim tradition of natural law in the thought of Ibn Rushd. I argue that this notion of natural law enriches the concept of law and can mediate conflicts of human law and divine law in Islam. I discuss the ontology, then epistemology, of Ibn Rushd\u2019s natural law, then situate the resultant conception of law within Islamic legal and theological contexts.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/jis\/etw045","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5198,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":" 28","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201327 "}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd and Natural Law: Mediating Human and Divine Law"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh’arism |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic Research |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 82-97 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Orhan Atalay |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5335","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5335,"authors_free":[{"id":6181,"entry_id":5335,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Orhan Atalay","free_first_name":"Orhan ","free_last_name":"Atalay","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5335,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Research","volume":"3","issue":"2 ","pages":" 82-97"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd on reconciliation: between philosophy and religion |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2006 |
| Journal | Aligarh journal of Islamic philosophy |
| Volume | 12 |
| Pages | 13-30 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Khawaja Muhammad Saeed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5555","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5555,"authors_free":[{"id":6449,"entry_id":5555,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Khawaja Muhammad Saeed","free_first_name":"Khawaja","free_last_name":"Muhammad Saeed","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd on reconciliation: between philosophy and religion","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd on reconciliation: between philosophy and religion"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5555,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Aligarh journal of Islamic philosophy","volume":"12","issue":"","pages":"13-30"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd on reconciliation: between philosophy and religion"]}
| Title | Il Kitāb al-kašf ʿan manāhiǧ di Averroè nella traduzione ebraico-latina di Abraham de Balmes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2002 |
| Journal | Annali di Ca' Foscari |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 5–36 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Silvia Di Donato |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"909","_score":null,"_source":{"id":909,"authors_free":[{"id":1077,"entry_id":909,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1025,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Di Donato","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Di Donato","norm_person":{"id":1025,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Di Donato","full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1034945653","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/171527049","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Silvia Di Donato"}}],"entry_title":"Il Kit\u0101b al-ka\u0161f \u02bfan man\u0101hi\u01e7 di Averro\u00e8 nella traduzione ebraico-latina di Abraham de Balmes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Il Kit\u0101b al-ka\u0161f \u02bfan man\u0101hi\u01e7 di Averro\u00e8 nella traduzione ebraico-latina di Abraham de Balmes"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1025,"full_name":"Silvia Di Donato","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":909,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Annali di Ca' Foscari","volume":"41","issue":"3","pages":"5\u201336"}},"sort":["Il Kit\u0101b al-ka\u0161f \u02bfan man\u0101hi\u01e7 di Averro\u00e8 nella traduzione ebraico-latina di Abraham de Balmes"]}
| Title | Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 27 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Influence, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Abuzar Rajabi , Morsal Azizi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali’s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5766","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5766,"authors_free":[{"id":6678,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abuzar Rajabi","free_first_name":"Abuzar ","free_last_name":"Rajabi","norm_person":null},{"id":6679,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morsal Azizi","free_first_name":"Morsal ","free_last_name":"Azizi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"},"abstract":"Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali\u2019s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.22108\/coth.2022.131221.1658","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5766,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"13","issue":"27","pages":"1-16"}},"sort":["Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"]}
| Title | Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Indonesian |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 71-92 |
| Categories | Logic, Method, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Raha Bistara |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash’ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd’s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5769","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5769,"authors_free":[{"id":6682,"entry_id":5769,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Raha Bistara","free_first_name":"Raha ","free_last_name":"Bistara","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd"},"abstract":"This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash\u2019ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd\u2019s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. ","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Indonesian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5769,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama","volume":"16","issue":"2","pages":"71-92"}},"sort":["Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd"]}
| Title | La risposta di Averroé alla XIV quaestio del « Tahafut » di Ghazālī intorno al movimento celeste |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1979 |
| Journal | Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 497-507 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Physics, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Giulio A. Lucchetta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43060777 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5713","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5713,"authors_free":[{"id":6621,"entry_id":5713,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1880,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","free_first_name":"Giulio A. ","free_last_name":"Lucchetta","norm_person":{"id":1880,"first_name":"Giulio A. ","last_name":"Lucchetta","full_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204033293","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Giulio A. Lucchetta"}}],"entry_title":"La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1979","language":"Italian","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43060777","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1880,"full_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5713,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica","volume":"71","issue":"3","pages":" 497-507"}},"sort":["La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste"]}