{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5126","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5126,"authors_free":[{"id":5901,"entry_id":5126,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Dag Nikolaus Hasse","free_first_name":"Dag Nikolaus ","free_last_name":"Hasse","norm_person":null},{"id":5902,"entry_id":5126,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":815,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Amos Bertolacci","free_first_name":"Amos ","free_last_name":"Bertolacci","norm_person":{"id":815,"first_name":"Amos","last_name":"Bertolacci","full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/156504006","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61846437","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Amos Bertolacci"}}],"entry_title":"The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna\u2019s Physics and Cosmology","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna\u2019s Physics and Cosmology"},"abstract":"Avicenna (Ibn S\u012bn\u0101) greatly influenced later medieval thinking about the earth and the cosmos, not only in his own civilization, but also in Hebrew and Latin cultures. The studies presented in this volume discuss the reception of prominent theories by Avicenna from the early 11th century onwards by thinkers like Averroes, Fahraddin ar-Razi, Samuel ibn Tibbon or Albertus Magnus. Among the topics which receive particular attention are the definition and existence of motion and time. Other important topics are covered too, such as Avicenna\u2019s theories of vacuum, causality, elements, substantial change, minerals, floods and mountains. It emerges, among other things, that Avicenna inherited to the discussion an acute sense for the epistemological status of natural science and for the mental and concrete existence of its objects. The volume also addresses the philological and historical circumstances of the textual tradition and sheds light on the translators Dominicus Gundisalvi, Avendauth and Alfred of Sareshel in particular.\r\nThe articles of this volume are presented by scholars who convened in 2013 to discuss their research on the influence of Avicenna\u2019s physics and cosmology in the Villa Vigoni, Italy.","btype":4,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781614516972","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"}],"authors":[{"id":815,"full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5126,"pubplace":"Boston; Berlin","publisher":"De Gruyter","series":"Scientia Graeco-Arabica","volume":"23","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna\u2019s Physics and Cosmology"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5065","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5065,"authors_free":[{"id":5822,"entry_id":5065,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1698,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"B\u00f6rje Byd\u00e9n","free_first_name":"B\u00f6rje","free_last_name":"Byd\u00e9n","norm_person":{"id":1698,"first_name":"B\u00f6rje","last_name":"Byd\u00e9n","full_name":"B\u00f6rje Byd\u00e9n","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1037804341","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=B\u00f6rje Byd\u00e9n"}},{"id":5823,"entry_id":5065,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1690,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Christina Thomsen Th\u00f6rnqvist","free_first_name":"Christina ","free_last_name":"Thomsen Th\u00f6rnqvist","norm_person":{"id":1690,"first_name":"Christina Thomsen ","last_name":"Th\u00f6rnqvist","full_name":"Christina Thomsen Th\u00f6rnqvist","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137538480","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Christina Thomsen Th\u00f6rnqvist"}}],"entry_title":"The Aristotelian Tradition: Aristotle\u2019s Works on Logic and Metaphysics and Their Reception in the Middle Ages","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Aristotelian Tradition: Aristotle\u2019s Works on Logic and Metaphysics and Their Reception in the Middle Ages"},"abstract":"The twelve essays in this volume are the result of a research programme by a Danish-Swedish research network into The Aristotelian Tradition: The reception of Aristotle\u2019s works on logic and metaphysics in the Middle Ages. This impressive and wide-ranging volume, which has its roots in the disciplines of both philology and philosophy, has at its core a focus on the different historical manifestations of Aristotelian thought on logical and metaphysical matters. The volume includes studies of texts by, among others, Apuleius, Boethius, Anonymus Aurelianensis III, Michael of Ephesus, Averroes, Nicholas of Paris, Robert Kilwardby, Thomas Aquinas, William of Ockham, and Francisco Su\u00e1rez, relating to themes and passages in Aristotle\u2019s Categories, On Interpretation, Prior Analytics, Posterior Analytics, Sophistical Refutations and Metaphysics. The book concludes with a new edition, with English translation and commentary, of the first part of a fiercely anti-Aristotelian work, which has been described as the starting-point for Renaissance Platonism and Aristotelianism alike: George Gemistos Plethon\u2019s On Aristotle\u2019s Departures from Plato.","btype":4,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1698,"full_name":"B\u00f6rje Byd\u00e9n","role":2},{"id":1690,"full_name":"Christina Thomsen Th\u00f6rnqvist","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5065,"pubplace":"Toronto, ON","publisher":"Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies","series":"Papers in Mediaeval Studies ","volume":"28","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["The Aristotelian Tradition: Aristotle\u2019s Works on Logic and Metaphysics and Their Reception in the Middle Ages"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1749","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1749,"authors_free":[{"id":2016,"entry_id":1749,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1485,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sarah Hutton","free_first_name":"Sarah","free_last_name":"Hutton","norm_person":{"id":1485,"first_name":"Sarah","last_name":"Hutton","full_name":"Sarah Hutton","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1145635474","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/76355229","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Sarah Hutton"}}],"entry_title":"The Cambridge Platonists and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Cambridge Platonists and Averroes"},"abstract":"The \u2018Averroism\u2019 which figures in my chapter is a radically attenuated version of the philosophy of Ibn Rushd \u2013 Averroism as represented by a single doctrine imputed to the Commentator, namely the idea of a single soul, common to all human beings. The subject of my chapter has less, therefore to do with the thought of Averroes in its later reception or manifestation, and more to do with an idea of Averroism which was current in seventeenth-century England. This is particularly true of the Cambridge Platonists for whom the Averroist doctrine of the intellectus agens is the key doctrine which they associate with Averroes and which they understood as a doctrine of a \u2018single soul\u2019 or \u2018common soul\u2019. The only one of their number to offer anything like an extensive critique of Averroes was Henry More (1614\u20131687). Although he too was primarily concerned with the Averroistic conception of the intellectus agens, his response is distinctive for his concern with the Italian Averroists of recent times, Girolamo Cardano, Pietro Pomponazzi and Giulio Cesare Vanini. Even though the Cambridge Platonists\u2019 views on the intellectus agens tell us more about themselves than about Averroes, their limited focus is nevertheless revealing of currents of diffusion of Averroistic ideas, and of the presence of Averroes even in the new waters of early modern philosophy. As I shall argue later, there is an important sense in which More\u2019s partial and distorted conception of the philosophy of Ibn Rushd contributed to a new conception of the self centred on consciousness. My chapter will offer a brief survey of identifiable references to Averroes in the work the Cambridge Platonists, starting with three Emmanuel College men, John Smith (1618\u20131652), Nathaniel Culverwell (1619\u20131651) and Ralph Cudworth (1617\u20131688). I shall then discuss Henry More, to whom the major part of this chapter will be devoted. But before discussing the Cambridge school, a few words on the background.","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5240-5_10","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1485,"full_name":"Sarah Hutton","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1749,"section_of":241,"pages":"197\u2013212","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":241,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":241,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Springer","series":"International Archives of the History of Ideas","volume":"211","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["The Cambridge Platonists and Averroes"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5689","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5689,"authors_free":[{"id":6594,"entry_id":5689,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jorge T. Gracia","free_first_name":"Jorge T. ","free_last_name":"Gracia","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Doctrine of the possible and Agent Intellects in Gonsalvus Hispanus' Question XIII","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Doctrine of the possible and Agent Intellects in Gonsalvus Hispanus' Question XIII"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/41974913","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5689,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Franciscan Studies","volume":"29","issue":"","pages":"5-36"}},"sort":["The Doctrine of the possible and Agent Intellects in Gonsalvus Hispanus' Question XIII"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"4995","_score":null,"_source":{"id":4995,"authors_free":[{"id":5729,"entry_id":4995,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sabeen Ahmed","free_first_name":"Sabeen","free_last_name":"Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"The Genesis of Secular Politics in Medieval Philosophy: The King of Averroes and the Emperor of Dante","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Genesis of Secular Politics in Medieval Philosophy: The King of Averroes and the Emperor of Dante"},"abstract":"In contemporary political discourse, the \"clash of civilizations\" rhetoric often undergirds philosophical analyses of \"democracy\" both at home and abroad. This is nowhere better articulated than in Jacques Derrida's Rogues, in which he describes Islam as the only religious or theocratic culture that would \"inspire and declare any resistance to democracy\" (Derrida 2005, 29). Curiously, Derrida attributes the failings of democracy in Islam to the lack of reference to Aristotle's Politics in the writings of the medieval Muslim philosophers. This paper aims to analyze this gross misconception of Islamic philosophy and illuminate the thoroughgoing influence the Muslim philosophers had on their Christian successors, those who are so often credited as foundations of Western political philosophy. In so doing, I compare the ideal states presented by Averroes and Dante \u2013 in which Aristotelian influence is intimately interlaced \u2013 and offer an analysis thereof as heralds of what we might call the secularization of the political, inspiring those democratic values that Derrida believes to be absent in the rich philosophy of the Middle Ages.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25180\/lj.v18i2.54","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":4995,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Labyrinth","volume":"18","issue":"2","pages":"209\u2013231"}},"sort":["The Genesis of Secular Politics in Medieval Philosophy: The King of Averroes and the Emperor of Dante"]}