Title | Averroes’ Decisive Treatise (Fasl al-maqal,) and Exposition (Kashf) as Dialectical Works |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2023 |
Published in | Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions |
Pages | 326-340 |
Categories | Dialectic, Law, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
Author(s) | Peter Adamson |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5611","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5611,"authors_free":[{"id":6513,"entry_id":5611,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes\u2019 Decisive Treatise (Fasl al-maqal,) and Exposition (Kashf) as Dialectical Works","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes\u2019 Decisive Treatise (Fasl al-maqal,) and Exposition (Kashf) as Dialectical Works"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781003309895-17","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":79,"category_name":"Dialectic","link":"bib?categories[]=Dialectic"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5611,"section_of":5606,"pages":"326-340","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5606,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Contextualizing Premodern Philosophy: Explorations of the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin Traditions","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2023","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This volume brings together contributions from distinguished scholars in the history of philosophy, focusing on points of interaction between discrete historical contexts, religions, and cultures found within the premodern period. The contributions connect thinkers from antiquity through the Middle Ages and include philosophers from the three major monotheistic faiths\u2014Judaism, Islam, and Christianity.\r\n\r\nBy emphasizing premodern philosophy\u2019s shared textual roots in antiquity, particularly the writings of Plato and Aristotle, the volume highlights points of cross-pollination between different schools, cultures, and moments in premodern thought. Approaching the complex history of the premodern world in an accessible way, the editors organize the volume so as to underscore the difficulties the premodern period poses for scholars, while accentuating the fascinating interplay between the Greek, Hebrew, Arabic, and Latin philosophical traditions. The contributors cover many topics ranging from the aims of Aristotle\u2019s cosmos, the adoption of Aristotle\u2019s Organon by al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, and the origins of the Plotiniana Arabica to the role of Ibn Gabirol\u2019s Fons vitae in the Latin West, the ways in which Islamic philosophy shaped thirteenth-century Latin conceptions of light, Roger Bacon\u2019s adaptation of Avicenna for use in his moral philosophy, and beyond. The volume\u2019s focus on \"source-based contextualism\" demonstrates an appreciation for the rich diversity of thought found in the premodern period, while revealing methodological challenges raised by the historical study of premodern philosophy.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5606,"pubplace":"New York","publisher":"Routledge ","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6507,"entry_id":5606,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1684,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Katja Krause","free_first_name":"Katja ","free_last_name":"Krause","norm_person":{"id":1684,"first_name":"Katja","last_name":"Krause","full_name":"Katja Krause","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077759428","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":6508,"entry_id":5606,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier","free_last_name":" L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2023]}
Title | The Reception of Averroes in Early Scholasticism |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2023 |
Published in | Human Nature in Early Franciscan Thought. Philosophical Background and Theological Significance |
Pages | 182-204 |
Categories | Psychology, De anima, Tradition and Reception |
Author(s) | Lydia Schumacher |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
This chapter intervenes in a longstanding debate about the origins of a psychological schema that is found in both of John’s works on the soul as well as in the Summa Halensis. This is the distinction between the material intellect, which is connected to the body, on the one hand, and the agent and possible intellects, which are separable from the body, on the other. Some past scholars have traced this scheme to Averroes’ distinction between a corruptible and an incorruptible intellect, while others have pointed out that there is insufficient evidence of Averroes’ influence at this time to support that attribution. The chapter gathers evidence which suggests that the scheme is a Latin scholastic invention which draws primarily on Avicenna and Aristotle rather than Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5616","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5616,"authors_free":[{"id":6519,"entry_id":5616,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1857,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lydia Schumacher","free_first_name":"Lydia","free_last_name":"Schumacher","norm_person":{"id":1857,"first_name":"Lydia ","last_name":"Schumacher","full_name":"Lydia Schumacher","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1100538305","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Lydia Schumacher"}}],"entry_title":"The Reception of Averroes in Early Scholasticism","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Reception of Averroes in Early Scholasticism"},"abstract":"This chapter intervenes in a longstanding debate about the origins of a psychological schema that is found in both of John\u2019s works on the soul as well as in the Summa Halensis. This is the distinction between the material intellect, which is connected to the body, on the one hand, and the agent and possible intellects, which are separable from the body, on the other. Some past scholars have traced this scheme to Averroes\u2019 distinction between a corruptible and an incorruptible intellect, while others have pointed out that there is insufficient evidence of Averroes\u2019 influence at this time to support that attribution. The chapter gathers evidence which suggests that the scheme is a Latin scholastic invention which draws primarily on Avicenna and Aristotle rather than Averroes.","btype":2,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009201131.008","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1857,"full_name":"Lydia Schumacher","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5616,"section_of":5617,"pages":"182-204","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5617,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Human Nature in Early Franciscan Thought. Philosophical Background and Theological Significance","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2023","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"In this book, Lydia Schumacher challenges the common assumption that early Franciscan thought simply reiterates the longstanding tradition of Augustine. She demonstrates how scholars from this tradition incorporated the work of Islamic and Jewish philosophers, whose works had recently been translated from Arabic, with a view to developing a unique approach to questions of human nature. These questions pertain to perennial philosophical concerns about the relationship between the body and the soul, the work of human cognition and sensation, and the power of free will. By highlighting the Arabic sources of early Franciscan views on these matters, Schumacher illustrates how scholars working in the early thirteenth century anticipated later developments in Franciscan thought which have often been described as novel or unprecedented. Above all, her study demonstrates that the early Franciscan philosophy of human nature was formulated with a view to bolstering the order's specific theological and religious ideals.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009201131","book":{"id":5617,"pubplace":"Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY, USA","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6520,"entry_id":5617,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1857,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Lydia Schumacher","free_first_name":"Lydia ","free_last_name":"Schumacher","norm_person":{"id":1857,"first_name":"Lydia ","last_name":"Schumacher","full_name":"Lydia Schumacher","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1100538305","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2023]}
Title | The Role of Consensus in Legal Hermeneutics: A Chapter from the Qanṭarat al-wuṣūl ilā ʿilm al-uṣūl of al-Muʾayyadī (d. c. 1044/1634) |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2023 |
Published in | Shiʿite Legal Theory: Sources and Commentaries |
Pages | 191-237 |
Categories | Law |
Author(s) | Robert Gleave , Kumail Rajani |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/jj.7358690.11 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5764","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5764,"authors_free":[{"id":6675,"entry_id":5764,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1715,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Robert Gleave","free_first_name":"Robert ","free_last_name":"Gleave","norm_person":{"id":1715,"first_name":"Robert","last_name":"Gleave","full_name":"Robert Gleave","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":" https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1034228870","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Robert Gleave"}},{"id":6676,"entry_id":5764,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1895,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kumail Rajani","free_first_name":"Kumail ","free_last_name":"Rajani","norm_person":{"id":1895,"first_name":"Kumail ","last_name":"Rajani","full_name":"Kumail Rajani","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1277666326","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Kumail Rajani"}}],"entry_title":"The Role of Consensus in Legal Hermeneutics: A Chapter from the Qan\u1e6darat al-wu\u1e63\u016bl il\u0101 \u02bfilm al-u\u1e63\u016bl of al-Mu\u02beayyad\u012b (d. c. 1044\/1634)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Role of Consensus in Legal Hermeneutics: A Chapter from the Qan\u1e6darat al-wu\u1e63\u016bl il\u0101 \u02bfilm al-u\u1e63\u016bl of al-Mu\u02beayyad\u012b (d. c. 1044\/1634)"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.3366\/jj.7358690.11","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":1715,"full_name":"Robert Gleave","role":1},{"id":1895,"full_name":"Kumail Rajani","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5764,"section_of":5763,"pages":"191-237","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5763,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Shi\u02bfite Legal Theory: Sources and Commentaries","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2023","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.3366\/jj.7358690","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5763,"pubplace":"Edinburgh","publisher":"Edinburgh University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6673,"entry_id":5763,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1895,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Kumail Rajani","free_first_name":"Kumail ","free_last_name":"Rajani","norm_person":{"id":1895,"first_name":"Kumail ","last_name":"Rajani","full_name":"Kumail Rajani","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1277666326","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}},{"id":6674,"entry_id":5763,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1715,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Robert Gleave","free_first_name":"Robert","free_last_name":"Gleave","norm_person":{"id":1715,"first_name":"Robert","last_name":"Gleave","full_name":"Robert Gleave","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":" https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1034228870","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2023]}
Title | The Averroesian Deliberative Pedagogy of Intercultural Education |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2023 |
Published in | |
Pages | 126 - 153 |
Categories | Pedagogy |
Author(s) | Wisam Kh. Abdul-Jabbar |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
This chapter introduces the Averroesian curriculum marked by Aristotelian thought as the locus classicus of culture. It posits a deliberative pedagogy conducive to intercultural thinking, fosters culturally responsive education, and responds to students’ need to be intercultural speakers. Drawing on Averroes’s philosophical thought, this chapter contributes to deliberative pedagogy, a dialogical form of reasoning whose aim is to find pragmatic alternatives that serve the collective and individual good with attention to the question of utility. It examines how a culture’s aptitude for intermediacy determines its dialogical capacity. Once integrated into a culture’s educational apparatus, it enhances its internal ability to interact with the abstruse and unfamiliar when encountering other cultures. The chapter introduces the intermediacy model as an example of intercultural deliberative pedagogy and explains how Averroes’s understanding of rawiyya resonates with deliberative education. It also addresses how Averroes’s position in finding a middle ground between Al-Ghazali’s conservative and Avicenna’s esoteric positions subscribes to the dialogical paradigm in education. For Averroes, intercultural dialogue is an Aristotelian disavowal of a monocentric takeover of the public space and education. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5814","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5814,"authors_free":[{"id":6737,"entry_id":5814,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wisam Kh. Abdul-Jabbar","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"The Averroesian Deliberative Pedagogy of Intercultural Education","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Averroesian Deliberative Pedagogy of Intercultural Education"},"abstract":"This chapter introduces the Averroesian curriculum marked by Aristotelian thought as the locus classicus of culture. It posits a deliberative pedagogy conducive to intercultural thinking, fosters culturally responsive education, and responds to students\u2019 need to be intercultural speakers. Drawing on Averroes\u2019s philosophical thought, this chapter contributes to deliberative pedagogy, a dialogical form of reasoning whose aim is to find pragmatic alternatives that serve the collective and individual good with attention to the question of utility. It examines how a culture\u2019s aptitude for intermediacy determines its dialogical capacity. Once integrated into a culture\u2019s educational apparatus, it enhances its internal ability to interact with the abstruse and unfamiliar when encountering other cultures. The chapter introduces the intermediacy model as an example of intercultural deliberative pedagogy and explains how Averroes\u2019s understanding of rawiyya resonates with deliberative education. It also addresses how Averroes\u2019s position in finding a middle ground between Al-Ghazali\u2019s conservative and Avicenna\u2019s esoteric positions subscribes to the dialogical paradigm in education. For Averroes, intercultural dialogue is an Aristotelian disavowal of a monocentric takeover of the public space and education.","btype":2,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780367854133-7 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":84,"category_name":"Pedagogy","link":"bib?categories[]=Pedagogy"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5814,"section_of":1303,"pages":"126 - 153","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":1303,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":1038,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":2,"language":"es","title":"","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"1999","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1999","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":1,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":null,"persons":[{"id":1491,"entry_id":1303,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1173,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep-Ignasi Saranyana","free_first_name":"Josep-Ignasi","free_last_name":"Saranyana","norm_person":{"id":1173,"first_name":"Josep-Ignasi","last_name":"Saranyana","full_name":"Josep-Ignasi Saranyana","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120990970","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51712989","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd120990970.html","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2023]}
Title | Philosopher-Kings and Counselors: How Should Philosophers Participate in Politics? |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
Pages | 253–274 |
Categories | Politics, Tradition and Reception |
Author(s) | Alexander Orwin |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
The most famous, or infamous, proposal in Plato's Republic concerns the rule of philosopher-kings. Throughout the long history of the philosophical reception of Plato, this theme has been explored, restated, and rejected in countless ways. One of the most original treatments of it comes from the Andalusian philosopher Averroes, in his Commentary on Plato's “Republic.” The title of this inventive work must not be construed too narrowly. On every major theme in the Republic, Averroes deviates, either by omission, addition, or editorial commentary, from Plato. His treatment of the philosopher-kings will make use of all these techniques. Before turning to this topic, I wish to make some general remarks about the work as a whole. Averroes announces his departure from Plato in the first sentence of the work, with the somewhat cryptic promise to remove all dialectical arguments from the Republic while preserving the demonstrative arguments (CR 21.4). Dialectic is associated, etymologically and semantically, with dialogue. Sure enough, Averroes expunges not only the dialogue form of the original but also its principal characters. This choice should not simply be attributed to ignorance: even if we were to assume that Averroes had only a summary of the original, he would surely have known of the existence of the characters Socrates and Thrasymachus through Alfarabi. In fact, Averroes himself mentions Thrasymachus and his arguments about justice in his Middle Commentary on the Topics. The form with which Averroes replaces the dialogue can hardly be described as a straightforward treatise. Averroes attributes the arguments he presents to a variety of sources, as indicated by expressions such as “we said,” and “Plato said.” In addition, Alfarabi and Aristotle are often cited, paraphrased, or even plagiarized, in what is ostensibly a commentary on Plato. This implies a dialogue of sorts between not only Averroes and Plato, but Aristotle and Alfarabi as well. One is tempted to say that the discussions between Socrates, an aged father, a sophist, and several young Greeks is replaced by a discussion between four great political philosophers across the ages, orchestrated by the latest representative of this august group. On this point, it is useful to recall Leo Strauss's observation, that no Platonic dialogue relates a discussion among equals. If dialectic involves a superior person such as Socrates leading less accomplished interlocutors by the hand, then Averroes's new, demonstrative form consists of a dialogue between equals to whom historical accident never granted the opportunity for a face-to-face meeting. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5358","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5358,"authors_free":[{"id":6209,"entry_id":5358,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1790,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":"Alexander ","free_last_name":"Orwin","norm_person":{"id":1790,"first_name":" Alexander","last_name":" Orwin","full_name":" Alexander Orwin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/1153328348","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]= Alexander Orwin"}}],"entry_title":"Philosopher-Kings and Counselors: How Should Philosophers Participate in Politics?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosopher-Kings and Counselors: How Should Philosophers Participate in Politics?"},"abstract":"The most famous, or infamous, proposal in Plato's Republic concerns the rule of philosopher-kings. Throughout the long history of the philosophical reception of Plato, this theme has been explored, restated, and rejected in countless ways. One of the most original treatments of it comes from the Andalusian philosopher Averroes, in his Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic.\u201d The title of this inventive work must not be construed too narrowly. On every major theme in the Republic, Averroes deviates, either by omission, addition, or editorial commentary, from Plato. His treatment of the philosopher-kings will make use of all these techniques. Before turning to this topic, I wish to make some general remarks about the work as a whole.\r\n\r\nAverroes announces his departure from Plato in the first sentence of the work, with the somewhat cryptic promise to remove all dialectical arguments from the Republic while preserving the demonstrative arguments (CR 21.4). Dialectic is associated, etymologically and semantically, with dialogue. Sure enough, Averroes expunges not only the dialogue form of the original but also its principal characters. This choice should not simply be attributed to ignorance: even if we were to assume that Averroes had only a summary of the original, he would surely have known of the existence of the characters Socrates and Thrasymachus through Alfarabi. In fact, Averroes himself mentions Thrasymachus and his arguments about justice in his Middle Commentary on the Topics.\r\n\r\nThe form with which Averroes replaces the dialogue can hardly be described as a straightforward treatise. Averroes attributes the arguments he presents to a variety of sources, as indicated by expressions such as \u201cwe said,\u201d and \u201cPlato said.\u201d In addition, Alfarabi and Aristotle are often cited, paraphrased, or even plagiarized, in what is ostensibly a commentary on Plato. This implies a dialogue of sorts between not only Averroes and Plato, but Aristotle and Alfarabi as well. One is tempted to say that the discussions between Socrates, an aged father, a sophist, and several young Greeks is replaced by a discussion between four great political philosophers across the ages, orchestrated by the latest representative of this august group. On this point, it is useful to recall Leo Strauss's observation, that no Platonic dialogue relates a discussion among equals. If dialectic involves a superior person such as Socrates leading less accomplished interlocutors by the hand, then Averroes's new, demonstrative form consists of a dialogue between equals to whom historical accident never granted the opportunity for a face-to-face meeting.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.013","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1790,"full_name":" Alexander Orwin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5358,"section_of":5346,"pages":"253\u2013274","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Natural Perfection or Divine Fiat |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
Pages | 233–252 |
Categories | Nicomachean ethics, Politics, Tradition and Reception |
Author(s) | Joshua Parens |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
As a reader of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic,” one is struck from the beginning by how much he omits from his commentary. Typically, this would be taken to indicate that Averroes does not comprehend Plato's intention. Indeed, the author can seem at times to confirm what many readers assume—namely, that he would rather have commented on a work by Aristotle. We will try to show that his major omissions—that is, of books 1, (most of ) 6, and 10, and especially what he substitutes for these omissions—form a coherent pattern and ultimately reveal a profound commentary on the omitted passages. That coherent pattern is already set within the first few pages of the work. From the beginning he seems to focus on the place of the Republic in relation to practical science and theoretical science. This comes as little surprise in a commentary on a work devoted to what I would like to call the philosopher-king conceit. The Republic is at least in part Plato's consideration of the relation between theoretical and practical science, as encapsulated in the person of the philosopher-king. Although Socrates does not get around to the centrality of this theme until Republic book 5, Averroes is on it from the beginning. He does so in part in order to place his discussion of the Republic in relation to his commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics—putatively the more theoretical of the two works. Be that as it may, we are most interested in what ties together the omissions of books 1, 6, and 10—and especially what Averroes substitutes for those omissions. We hope to show that the golden thread running through what Averroes substitutes is the theme of human perfection, in at least two senses: the philosopher-king and immortality. In each case, there is some element in Plato's original that Averroes needs to take into another register (from conventionalism in book 1 to fiat transplanted into the Second Treatise; from separate forms in book 6 to the active intellect in the Second Treatise; and from immortality of the soul in book 10 to conjunction with the active intellect in the Second Treatise). In effect, all these omissions are drawn together in the Second Treatise. For that reason, eventually, we will comment more closely on the most relevant section of the Second Treatise (60.17–74.12). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5357","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5357,"authors_free":[{"id":6208,"entry_id":5357,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1783,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joshua Parens","free_first_name":"Joshua","free_last_name":" Parens","norm_person":{"id":1783,"first_name":"Joshua","last_name":"Parens","full_name":"Joshua Parens","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172958881","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Joshua Parens"}}],"entry_title":"Natural Perfection or Divine Fiat","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Natural Perfection or Divine Fiat"},"abstract":"As a reader of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic,\u201d one is struck from the beginning by how much he omits from his commentary. Typically, this would be taken to indicate that Averroes does not comprehend Plato's intention. Indeed, the author can seem at times to confirm what many readers assume\u2014namely, that he would rather have commented on a work by Aristotle. We will try to show that his major omissions\u2014that is, of books 1, (most of ) 6, and 10, and especially what he substitutes for these omissions\u2014form a coherent pattern and ultimately reveal a profound commentary on the omitted passages. That coherent pattern is already set within the first few pages of the work. From the beginning he seems to focus on the place of the Republic in relation to practical science and theoretical science. This comes as little surprise in a commentary on a work devoted to what I would like to call the philosopher-king conceit. The Republic is at least in part Plato's consideration of the relation between theoretical and practical science, as encapsulated in the person of the philosopher-king. Although Socrates does not get around to the centrality of this theme until Republic book 5, Averroes is on it from the beginning. He does so in part in order to place his discussion of the Republic in relation to his commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics\u2014putatively the more theoretical of the two works. Be that as it may, we are most interested in what ties together the omissions of books 1, 6, and 10\u2014and especially what Averroes substitutes for those omissions. We hope to show that the golden thread running through what Averroes substitutes is the theme of human perfection, in at least two senses: the philosopher-king and immortality. In each case, there is some element in Plato's original that Averroes needs to take into another register (from conventionalism in book 1 to fiat transplanted into the Second Treatise; from separate forms in book 6 to the active intellect in the Second Treatise; and from immortality of the soul in book 10 to conjunction with the active intellect in the Second Treatise). In effect, all these omissions are drawn together in the Second Treatise. For that reason, eventually, we will comment more closely on the most relevant section of the Second Treatise (60.17\u201374.12).","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.012","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1783,"full_name":"Joshua Parens","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5357,"section_of":5346,"pages":"233\u2013252","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
Title | The Two Hebrew-into-Latin Translations of Averroes’s Commentary on Plato’s “Republic”: Method, Motivation, and Context |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
Pages | 297–318 |
Categories | Transmission |
Author(s) | Michael Engel |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” was translated twice into Latin; both translations were made from the Hebrew version of Samuel ben Judah of Marseille. The first translation was done by Elijah Del Medigo (ca. 1455–93), a Crete-born Jew, who spent most of his life in northern Italy, Crete being at that time under Venetian rule. Although a devout Jew, Del Medigo's immediate intellectual milieu was Christian, mostly made up of figures related in some way to the university of Padua and to powerful circles in Venice. Most of Del Medigo's literary output was in Latin—including his Hebrew-into-Latin translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic”—and he himself translated some of his own original Latin works into Hebrew. Thematically, Del Medigo focused almost solely on the works of Averroes. His translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” was part of his general endeavour of translating and commenting on the works of Averroes, while working at the service of his Christian patrons—namely, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Domenico Grimani. On his return to Crete, toward the end of his life, Del Medigo composed his Hebrew work Beḥinat haDat, which became his most celebrated work. In that work Del Medigo examines the relation between Judaism and rational thought, determining the rational nature of Judaism as opposed to the irrational character of Christian dogmas. The second translation was by the Jewish physician and translator Jacob Mantino (d. 1549). Mantino, a Jewish physician who lived most of his life in Italy, had close relationships with bishops and cardinals to whom he dedicated several of his translations and he was the personal physician to Pope Paul III. Mantino translated many of Averroes's commentaries, and was, according to Dag Hasse, “the most prolific and most acclaimed among all Renaissance translators of Averroes.” Del Medigo's translation was never printed during the Renaissance; it was discovered by Paul Oscar Kristeller in a Siena manuscript and published as a critical edition in 1992. Mantino's translation, first published in 1539, was printed four times during the Renaissance, yet has never received a modern edition. This chapter begins with a general overview of the two translations, discussing their different nature in light of the different circumstances surrounding their production. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5360","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5360,"authors_free":[{"id":6211,"entry_id":5360,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Engel","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Engel","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Two Hebrew-into-Latin Translations of Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d: Method, Motivation, and Context","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Two Hebrew-into-Latin Translations of Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d: Method, Motivation, and Context"},"abstract":"Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d was translated twice into Latin; both translations were made from the Hebrew version of Samuel ben Judah of Marseille. The first translation was done by Elijah Del Medigo (ca. 1455\u201393), a Crete-born Jew, who spent most of his life in northern Italy, Crete being at that time under Venetian rule. Although a devout Jew, Del Medigo's immediate intellectual milieu was Christian, mostly made up of figures related in some way to the university of Padua and to powerful circles in Venice. Most of Del Medigo's literary output was in Latin\u2014including his Hebrew-into-Latin translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d\u2014and he himself translated some of his own original Latin works into Hebrew. Thematically, Del Medigo focused almost solely on the works of Averroes. His translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d was part of his general endeavour of translating and commenting on the works of Averroes, while working at the service of his Christian patrons\u2014namely, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Domenico Grimani. On his return to Crete, toward the end of his life, Del Medigo composed his Hebrew work Be\u1e25inat haDat, which became his most celebrated work. In that work Del Medigo examines the relation between Judaism and rational thought, determining the rational nature of Judaism as opposed to the irrational character of Christian dogmas.\r\n\r\nThe second translation was by the Jewish physician and translator Jacob Mantino (d. 1549). Mantino, a Jewish physician who lived most of his life in Italy, had close relationships with bishops and cardinals to whom he dedicated several of his translations and he was the personal physician to Pope Paul III. Mantino translated many of Averroes's commentaries, and was, according to Dag Hasse, \u201cthe most prolific and most acclaimed among all Renaissance translators of Averroes.\u201d\r\n\r\nDel Medigo's translation was never printed during the Renaissance; it was discovered by Paul Oscar Kristeller in a Siena manuscript and published as a critical edition in 1992. Mantino's translation, first published in 1539, was printed four times during the Renaissance, yet has never received a modern edition. This chapter begins with a general overview of the two translations, discussing their different nature in light of the different circumstances surrounding their production.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.015","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5360,"section_of":5346,"pages":"297\u2013318","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Three Readings of Averroes’s Commentary on Plato’s “Republic” in Medieval Jewish Thought |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
Pages | 277–296 |
Categories | Tradition and Reception, Influence |
Author(s) | Alexander Green |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
The ethical and political writings by late medieval Jewish philosophers are generally seen to be rooted in two fundamental classical texts, Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Plato's Republic. Yet, regarding the Republic, medieval Jewish thinkers likely had no direct access to it. It was Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles's translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” into Hebrew in the 1320s that gave Hebrew readers some access to the Republic and made it the central classical text on political philosophy for Jewish thought. Indeed, it was used by Jewish thinkers for several hundred years thereafter. This chapter will focus on the question of how Plato's Republic came to influence medieval Jewish thought; in doing so, it will attempt to map out three distinct trends in how Jewish thinkers of the medieval period interpreted the Republic's core ideas. Samuel Ben Judah of Marseilles and the Translation into Hebrew The introduction of Plato's Republic into Jewish discussions on the nature of the political community took place after Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles's translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” from Arabic into Hebrew was completed in 1320 and revised in 1321 and 1322. Samuel came from an established family in Provence that had acquired wealth over multiple generations. He studied philosophy with Senor (Don) Astruc de Noves and translated works on logic and astronomy. The movement of translating the great works of science and secular philosophy from Arabic into Hebrew, which had been started in Provence by Samuel ibn Tibbon (ca. 1165−1232) in the first decades of the thirteenth century and been furthered, in large part, by his son, Moses ibn Tibbon (ca. 1195−1274), his son-in-law, Jacob Anatoli (1194−1256), and his grandson, Jacob b. Makhir (ca. 1236−1304), was gradually coming to an end after the prodigious activity of Qalonimos ben Qalonimos (ca. 1286−1328) in the first decades of the fourteenth century. It had already begun to transform Judaism into what some have termed a philosophic religion. The deficiency in this model of philosophic religion is that it was overly focused on natural science and mostly ignored practical philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5359","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5359,"authors_free":[{"id":6210,"entry_id":5359,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alexander Green","free_first_name":"Alexander","free_last_name":"Green","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Three Readings of Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d in Medieval Jewish Thought","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Three Readings of Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d in Medieval Jewish Thought"},"abstract":"The ethical and political writings by late medieval Jewish philosophers are generally seen to be rooted in two fundamental classical texts, Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Plato's Republic. Yet, regarding the Republic, medieval Jewish thinkers likely had no direct access to it. It was Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles's translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d into Hebrew in the 1320s that gave Hebrew readers some access to the Republic and made it the central classical text on political philosophy for Jewish thought. Indeed, it was used by Jewish thinkers for several hundred years thereafter. This chapter will focus on the question of how Plato's Republic came to influence medieval Jewish thought; in doing so, it will attempt to map out three distinct trends in how Jewish thinkers of the medieval period interpreted the Republic's core ideas.\r\n\r\nSamuel Ben Judah of Marseilles and the Translation into Hebrew\r\n\r\nThe introduction of Plato's Republic into Jewish discussions on the nature of the political community took place after Samuel ben Judah of Marseilles's translation of Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d from Arabic into Hebrew was completed in 1320 and revised in 1321 and 1322. Samuel came from an established family in Provence that had acquired wealth over multiple generations. He studied philosophy with Senor (Don) Astruc de Noves and translated works on logic and astronomy. The movement of translating the great works of science and secular philosophy from Arabic into Hebrew, which had been started in Provence by Samuel ibn Tibbon (ca. 1165\u22121232) in the first decades of the thirteenth century and been furthered, in large part, by his son, Moses ibn Tibbon (ca. 1195\u22121274), his son-in-law, Jacob Anatoli (1194\u22121256), and his grandson, Jacob b. Makhir (ca. 1236\u22121304), was gradually coming to an end after the prodigious activity of Qalonimos ben Qalonimos (ca. 1286\u22121328) in the first decades of the fourteenth century. It had already begun to transform Judaism into what some have termed a philosophic religion. The deficiency in this model of philosophic religion is that it was overly focused on natural science and mostly ignored practical philosophy.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.014","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5359,"section_of":5346,"pages":"277\u2013296","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Expelling Dialectics from the Ideal State: Making the World Safe for Philosophy in Averroes’s Commentary on Plato’s “Republic” |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
Pages | 69–86 |
Categories | Politics, Dialectic |
Author(s) | Yehuda Halper |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Averroes begins his Commentary on Plato's “Republic” with the assertion that the intention of his treatise is “to abstract from the statements that are attributed to Plato about political governance that which is included in scientific statements, and to eliminate the dialectical statements from it.” This assertion would seem to find its full expression in the form of Averroes's Commentary: Plato's dialogue in ten books has become three treatises in Averroes's Commentary, which explicitly omit books 1 and 10. Moreover, Glaucon, Adeimantus, Thrasymachus, Polemarchus, and Cephalus are not mentioned at all in Averroes's Commentary; even Socrates is only mentioned once and then merely with reference to his choosing to die rather than live in a corrupt city—that is, with reference to events not literally referred to in Plato's Republic. Rather, the one who speaks in Averroes's Commentary would seem to be Plato himself. Even if his words occasionally intermingle with those of Averroes, the resulting text takes the form of a monologue rather than a dialogue. Furthermore, Averroes dedicates the first argument of his Commentary to explaining the place of the science of governance, the purported topic of the Republic, in the Aristotelian hierarchy of the sciences. According to Averroes, the science of governance, which is the practical science dealing with volition and will, has two parts: a theoretical part, which treats “volitional actions and habits in general” (haqinyanim wehapeʿulot hareṣoniyyim) and which he associates with Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics; and a practical part, which deals with the establishment and ordering of those habits in order to achieve perfect actions and which he associates with Plato's Republic, since Aristotle's Politics was not available to him. As the practical part of practical science, Averroes's Republic fits into an Aristotelian division of the sciences—even if it is not exactly Aristotle's own division—as a treatise, or series of treatises, dealing with political science. In adopting this Aristotelian form, Averroes's Commentary dispenses with the dialogue form of Plato's writing. It appears from the rest of Averroes's Commentary that he has thrown out the dialecticians along with the dialogues. Perhaps as a consequence of this, Plato's account of the culmination of human reason in dialectic in connection with the divided line (Republic 509d–511e) is, in Averroes's Commentary, a culmination of human reason in Aristotelian metaphysics (hafilosofiah harišonah). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5349","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5349,"authors_free":[{"id":6199,"entry_id":5349,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1500,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yehuda Halper","free_first_name":"Yehuda","free_last_name":"Halper","norm_person":{"id":1500,"first_name":"Yehuda","last_name":"Halper","full_name":"Yehuda Halper","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142969923","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/177995327","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yehuda Halper"}}],"entry_title":"Expelling Dialectics from the Ideal State: Making the World Safe for Philosophy in Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Expelling Dialectics from the Ideal State: Making the World Safe for Philosophy in Averroes\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s \u201cRepublic\u201d"},"abstract":"Averroes begins his Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d with the assertion that the intention of his treatise is \u201cto abstract from the statements that are attributed to Plato about political governance that which is included in scientific statements, and to eliminate the dialectical statements from it.\u201d This assertion would seem to find its full expression in the form of Averroes's Commentary: Plato's dialogue in ten books has become three treatises in Averroes's Commentary, which explicitly omit books 1 and 10. Moreover, Glaucon, Adeimantus, Thrasymachus, Polemarchus, and Cephalus are not mentioned at all in Averroes's Commentary; even Socrates is only mentioned once and then merely with reference to his choosing to die rather than live in a corrupt city\u2014that is, with reference to events not literally referred to in Plato's Republic. Rather, the one who speaks in Averroes's Commentary would seem to be Plato himself. Even if his words occasionally intermingle with those of Averroes, the resulting text takes the form of a monologue rather than a dialogue. Furthermore, Averroes dedicates the first argument of his Commentary to explaining the place of the science of governance, the purported topic of the Republic, in the Aristotelian hierarchy of the sciences. According to Averroes, the science of governance, which is the practical science dealing with volition and will, has two parts: a theoretical part, which treats \u201cvolitional actions and habits in general\u201d (haqinyanim wehape\u02bfulot hare\u1e63oniyyim) and which he associates with Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics; and a practical part, which deals with the establishment and ordering of those habits in order to achieve perfect actions and which he associates with Plato's Republic, since Aristotle's Politics was not available to him. As the practical part of practical science, Averroes's Republic fits into an Aristotelian division of the sciences\u2014even if it is not exactly Aristotle's own division\u2014as a treatise, or series of treatises, dealing with political science. In adopting this Aristotelian form, Averroes's Commentary dispenses with the dialogue form of Plato's writing.\r\n\r\nIt appears from the rest of Averroes's Commentary that he has thrown out the dialecticians along with the dialogues. Perhaps as a consequence of this, Plato's account of the culmination of human reason in dialectic in connection with the divided line (Republic 509d\u2013511e) is, in Averroes's Commentary, a culmination of human reason in Aristotelian metaphysics (hafilosofiah hari\u0161onah).","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.004","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":79,"category_name":"Dialectic","link":"bib?categories[]=Dialectic"}],"authors":[{"id":1500,"full_name":"Yehuda Halper","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5349,"section_of":5346,"pages":"69\u201386","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
Title | Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes’s Novel Placement of the Platonic City |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2022 |
Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
Pages | 19–39 |
Categories | al-Fārābī, Galen, Aristotle, Plato, Politics, Commentary |
Author(s) | Alexander Orwin |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” goes far beyond merely commenting on the original. With the benefit of 1,500 years of hindsight, it reckons with important works of philosophy that would have been completely unknown to Plato. Averroes mentions three authors of such works by name: Galen, whom he mostly rebukes, Aristotle, and Alfarabi. It would be hasty to assert that by including such extraneous material, Averroes departs from Plato, but, at the very least, he updates him on account of historical developments. The importance of Averroes's post-Platonic additions is evident from the very structure of the work. The part of it that can plausibly claim to be a commentary on Plato does not begin until 27.24, almost seven pages into Rosenthal's Hebrew text. Averroes begins to address the subject of war, corresponding to Republic 374b, having skipped all of book 1 and the majority of book 2, with only two brief references to them in the opening section (CR 22.27–30, 23.31–33, cf. 47.29–30and 105.25–27). Averroes does not justify his omission until the very end of the work, when he states that the opening part of the Republic does not contain any of the demonstrative arguments of which his commentary is comprised (CR 105.25–27, cf. 21.4). He is more immediately forthright about the reasons for what he includes in its place. In keeping with the demonstrative focus of the work, Averroes replaces Platonic dialectic with a substantial discussion of science. Having divided practical science into two parts, one about general habits and actions and another about their implementation, Averroes explains: “Before we begin a point-by-point explanation of what is in these arguments [of Plato], we ought to mention the things pertinent to this [second] part [of practical science] and explained in the first part, that serve as foundation for what we wish to say here at the beginning” (CR 22.6–8). Averroes's introduction concerns above all the first part of political science, while the Republic proper contains only the second. Averroes attributes to Plato only a small part of the ensuing discussion, concerning justice, the division of labor, and the arrangement of the soul (CR 22.22–24.6, esp. 22.27, 23.31). The other passages are inspired by Aristotle and especially Alfarabi. Averroes appears to substitute scientific arguments from Aristotle and Alfarabi—mainly about science, philosophy, courage, and war—for Plato's dialectical introduction about justice and the founding of the just city. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5347","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5347,"authors_free":[{"id":6197,"entry_id":5347,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1790,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":"Alexander","free_last_name":"Orwin","norm_person":{"id":1790,"first_name":" Alexander","last_name":" Orwin","full_name":" Alexander Orwin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/1153328348","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]= Alexander Orwin"}}],"entry_title":"Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City"},"abstract":"Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d goes far beyond merely commenting on the original. With the benefit of 1,500 years of hindsight, it reckons with important works of philosophy that would have been completely unknown to Plato. Averroes mentions three authors of such works by name: Galen, whom he mostly rebukes, Aristotle, and Alfarabi. It would be hasty to assert that by including such extraneous material, Averroes departs from Plato, but, at the very least, he updates him on account of historical developments.\r\n\r\nThe importance of Averroes's post-Platonic additions is evident from the very structure of the work. The part of it that can plausibly claim to be a commentary on Plato does not begin until 27.24, almost seven pages into Rosenthal's Hebrew text. Averroes begins to address the subject of war, corresponding to Republic 374b, having skipped all of book 1 and the majority of book 2, with only two brief references to them in the opening section (CR 22.27\u201330, 23.31\u201333, cf. 47.29\u201330and 105.25\u201327). Averroes does not justify his omission until the very end of the work, when he states that the opening part of the Republic does not contain any of the demonstrative arguments of which his commentary is comprised (CR 105.25\u201327, cf. 21.4). He is more immediately forthright about the reasons for what he includes in its place. In keeping with the demonstrative focus of the work, Averroes replaces Platonic dialectic with a substantial discussion of science. Having divided practical science into two parts, one about general habits and actions and another about their implementation, Averroes explains: \u201cBefore we begin a point-by-point explanation of what is in these arguments [of Plato], we ought to mention the things pertinent to this [second] part [of practical science] and explained in the first part, that serve as foundation for what we wish to say here at the beginning\u201d (CR 22.6\u20138). Averroes's introduction concerns above all the first part of political science, while the Republic proper contains only the second. Averroes attributes to Plato only a small part of the ensuing discussion, concerning justice, the division of labor, and the arrangement of the soul (CR 22.22\u201324.6, esp. 22.27, 23.31). The other passages are inspired by Aristotle and especially Alfarabi. Averroes appears to substitute scientific arguments from Aristotle and Alfarabi\u2014mainly about science, philosophy, courage, and war\u2014for Plato's dialectical introduction about justice and the founding of the just city.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.002","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1790,"full_name":" Alexander Orwin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5347,"section_of":5346,"pages":"19\u201339","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2022]}
Title | 'Volo magis stare cum Avicenna'. Der Zufall zwischen Averroisten und Avicennisten |
Type | Book Section |
Language | German |
Date | 2006 |
Published in | Wissen über Grenzen. Arabisches Wissen und lateinisches Mittelalter |
Pages | 662–676 |
Categories | Tradition and Reception, Avicenna |
Author(s) | Sven K. Knebel |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"874","_score":null,"_source":{"id":874,"authors_free":[{"id":1041,"entry_id":874,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1003,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Sven K. Knebel","free_first_name":"Sven K.","free_last_name":"Knebel","norm_person":{"id":1003,"first_name":"Sven K.","last_name":"Knebel","full_name":"Sven K. Knebel","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/122283600","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/71525882","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd122283600.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Sven K. Knebel"}}],"entry_title":"'Volo magis stare cum Avicenna'. Der Zufall zwischen Averroisten und Avicennisten","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"'Volo magis stare cum Avicenna'. Der Zufall zwischen Averroisten und Avicennisten"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2006","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1003,"full_name":"Sven K. Knebel","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":874,"section_of":24,"pages":"662\u2013676","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":24,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Wissen \u00fcber Grenzen. Arabisches Wissen und lateinisches Mittelalter","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2006","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2006","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":24,"pubplace":"Berlin, New York","publisher":"Walter de Gruyter","series":"Miscellanea Mediaevalia","volume":"33","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["'Volo magis stare cum Avicenna'. Der Zufall zwischen Averroisten und Avicennisten"]}
Title | A Case of "Author's Variant Readings" and the Textual History of Averroes' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2006 |
Published in | Écriture et réécriture des textes philosophiques médiévaux. Volume d'hommage offert à Colette Sirat |
Pages | 465–483 |
Categories | Metaphysics |
Author(s) | Mauro Zonta |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"609","_score":null,"_source":{"id":609,"authors_free":[{"id":760,"entry_id":609,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"A Case of \"Author's Variant Readings\" and the Textual History of Averroes' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics\n ","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A Case of \"Author's Variant Readings\" and the Textual History of Averroes' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics\n "},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":609,"section_of":48,"pages":"465\u2013483","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":48,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"\u00c9criture et r\u00e9\u00e9criture des textes philosophiques m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux. Volume d'hommage offert \u00e0 Colette Sirat","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2006","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2006","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":48,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepols","series":"Textes et \u00e9tudes du moyen \u00e2ge","volume":"34","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A Case of \"Author's Variant Readings\" and the Textual History of Averroes' Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics\n "]}
Title | A Map of Averroes’ Criticism against Avicenna: Physics, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione and Meteorology |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2018 |
Published in | The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna’s Physics and Cosmology |
Pages | 163–240 |
Categories | Avicenna, De caelo, Physics, Meteorology, Commentary, Surveys |
Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5128","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5128,"authors_free":[{"id":5904,"entry_id":5128,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Christina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"A Map of Averroes\u2019 Criticism against Avicenna: Physics, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione and Meteorology","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Map of Averroes\u2019 Criticism against Avicenna: Physics, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione and Meteorology"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781614516972-008","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":66,"category_name":"De caelo","link":"bib?categories[]=De caelo"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":67,"category_name":"Meteorology","link":"bib?categories[]=Meteorology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5128,"section_of":5126,"pages":"163\u2013240","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5126,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"The Arabic, Hebrew and Latin Reception of Avicenna\u2019s Physics and Cosmology","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2018","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Avicenna (Ibn S\u012bn\u0101) greatly influenced later medieval thinking about the earth and the cosmos, not only in his own civilization, but also in Hebrew and Latin cultures. The studies presented in this volume discuss the reception of prominent theories by Avicenna from the early 11th century onwards by thinkers like Averroes, Fahraddin ar-Razi, Samuel ibn Tibbon or Albertus Magnus. Among the topics which receive particular attention are the definition and existence of motion and time. Other important topics are covered too, such as Avicenna\u2019s theories of vacuum, causality, elements, substantial change, minerals, floods and mountains. It emerges, among other things, that Avicenna inherited to the discussion an acute sense for the epistemological status of natural science and for the mental and concrete existence of its objects. The volume also addresses the philological and historical circumstances of the textual tradition and sheds light on the translators Dominicus Gundisalvi, Avendauth and Alfred of Sareshel in particular.\r\nThe articles of this volume are presented by scholars who convened in 2013 to discuss their research on the influence of Avicenna\u2019s physics and cosmology in the Villa Vigoni, Italy.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9781614516972","book":{"id":5126,"pubplace":"Boston; Berlin","publisher":"De Gruyter","series":"Scientia Graeco-Arabica","volume":"23","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A Map of Averroes\u2019 Criticism against Avicenna: Physics, De caelo, De generatione et corruptione and Meteorology"]}
Title | A Note about Two Newly-Discovered Hebrew Quotations of Averroes' Works Lost in their Original Arabic Texts |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2007 |
Published in | אודה לאוד״ה. Studies in Hebrew Literature and Jewish Culture. Presented to Albert van der Heide on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday |
Pages | 241–250 |
Categories | Transmission, Jewish Averroism |
Author(s) | Mauro Zonta |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1373","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1373,"authors_free":[{"id":1565,"entry_id":1373,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"A Note about Two Newly-Discovered Hebrew Quotations of Averroes' Works Lost in their Original Arabic Texts","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A Note about Two Newly-Discovered Hebrew Quotations of Averroes' Works Lost in their Original Arabic Texts"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":8,"category_name":"Jewish Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Jewish Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1373,"section_of":171,"pages":"241\u2013250","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":171,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"\u05d0\u05d5\u05d3\u05d4 \u05dc\u05d0\u05d5\u05d3\u05f4\u05d4. Studies in Hebrew Literature and Jewish Culture. Presented to Albert van der Heide on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2007","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2007","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":171,"pubplace":"Dordrecht","publisher":"Springer","series":"Amsterdam Studies in Jewish Thought","volume":"12","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A Note about Two Newly-Discovered Hebrew Quotations of Averroes' Works Lost in their Original Arabic Texts"]}
Title | A propos de l'averroïsme. Prémisses pour une lecture philosophique |
Type | Book Section |
Language | French |
Date | 2001 |
Published in | Actualité d'Averroès. Colloque du huitième centenaire. Carthage, 16–21 février 1998 |
Pages | 238–241 |
Categories | Averroism |
Author(s) | Bensalem Himmich |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1611","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1611,"authors_free":[{"id":1849,"entry_id":1611,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1413,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Bensalem Himmich","free_first_name":"Bensalem","free_last_name":"Himmich","norm_person":{"id":1413,"first_name":"Bensalem","last_name":"Himmich","full_name":"Bensalem Himmich","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/108974224X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/41841460","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Bensalem Himmich"}}],"entry_title":"A propos de l'averro\u00efsme. Pr\u00e9misses pour une lecture philosophique","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A propos de l'averro\u00efsme. Pr\u00e9misses pour une lecture philosophique"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2001","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1413,"full_name":"Bensalem Himmich","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1611,"section_of":219,"pages":"238\u2013241","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":219,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Actualit\u00e9 d'Averro\u00e8s. Colloque du huiti\u00e8me centenaire. Carthage, 16\u201321 f\u00e9vrier 1998","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2001","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2001","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":219,"pubplace":"Tunis and Paris","publisher":"Acad\u00e9mie tunisienne Be\u00eft al-Hikma and UNESCO","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A propos de l'averro\u00efsme. Pr\u00e9misses pour une lecture philosophique"]}
Title | A propos de la thèse d'Averroès. Pietro Pomponazzi versus Agostino Nifo |
Type | Book Section |
Language | French |
Date | 2009 |
Published in | Pietro Pomponazzi entre traditions et innovations |
Pages | 83–98 |
Categories | Latin Averroism |
Author(s) | Laurence Boulègue |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1418","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1418,"authors_free":[{"id":1613,"entry_id":1418,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1311,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laurence Boul\u00e8gue","free_first_name":"Laurence","free_last_name":"Boul\u00e8gue","norm_person":{"id":1311,"first_name":"Laurence","last_name":"Boul\u00e8gue","full_name":"Laurence Boul\u00e8gue","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131802682","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61786592","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laurence Boul\u00e8gue"}}],"entry_title":"A propos de la th\u00e8se d'Averro\u00e8s. Pietro Pomponazzi versus Agostino Nifo","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A propos de la th\u00e8se d'Averro\u00e8s. Pietro Pomponazzi versus Agostino Nifo"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2009","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1311,"full_name":"Laurence Boul\u00e8gue","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1418,"section_of":187,"pages":"83\u201398","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":187,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Pietro Pomponazzi entre traditions et innovations","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2009","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2009","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":187,"pubplace":"Amsterdam","publisher":"Gr\u00fcner","series":"Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie","volume":"48","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A propos de la th\u00e8se d'Averro\u00e8s. Pietro Pomponazzi versus Agostino Nifo"]}
Title | A propos des manuscrits arabes d'Averroès transcrits en caractères hébraïques |
Type | Book Section |
Language | French |
Date | 2001 |
Published in | Actualité d'Averroès. Colloque du huitième centenaire. Carthage, 16–21 février 1998 |
Pages | 59–64 |
Categories | no categories |
Author(s) | Abdelkader Ben Chéhida |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1580","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1580,"authors_free":[{"id":1813,"entry_id":1580,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1390,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelkader Ben Ch\u00e9hida","free_first_name":"Abdelkader","free_last_name":"Ben Ch\u00e9hida","norm_person":{"id":1390,"first_name":"Abdelkader","last_name":"Ben Ch\u00e9hida","full_name":"Abdelkader Ben Ch\u00e9hida","short_ident":"AbdBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelkader Ben Ch\u00e9hida"}}],"entry_title":"A propos des manuscrits arabes d'Averro\u00e8s transcrits en caract\u00e8res h\u00e9bra\u00efques","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A propos des manuscrits arabes d'Averro\u00e8s transcrits en caract\u00e8res h\u00e9bra\u00efques"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2001","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":1390,"full_name":"Abdelkader Ben Ch\u00e9hida","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1580,"section_of":219,"pages":"59\u201364","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":219,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Actualit\u00e9 d'Averro\u00e8s. Colloque du huiti\u00e8me centenaire. Carthage, 16\u201321 f\u00e9vrier 1998","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2001","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2001","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":219,"pubplace":"Tunis and Paris","publisher":"Acad\u00e9mie tunisienne Be\u00eft al-Hikma and UNESCO","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A propos des manuscrits arabes d'Averro\u00e8s transcrits en caract\u00e8res h\u00e9bra\u00efques"]}
Title | A propos du traité al-Ḍarūr [sic] fī l-manṭiq d'Averroès et les termes tasdīq et taṣawwur qui y sont développés |
Type | Book Section |
Language | French |
Date | 1999 |
Published in | Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition. Sources, Constitution and Reception of the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd (1126–1198). Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Averroicum (Cologne, 1996) |
Pages | 163–171 |
Categories | Logic |
Author(s) | Charles E. Butterworth |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"474","_score":null,"_source":{"id":474,"authors_free":[{"id":618,"entry_id":474,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":123,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","free_first_name":"Charles E.","free_last_name":"Butterworth","norm_person":{"id":123,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105338856X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/41853950","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles E. Butterworth"}}],"entry_title":"A propos du trait\u00e9 al-\u1e0car\u016br [sic] f\u012b l-man\u1e6diq d'Averro\u00e8s et les termes tasd\u012bq et ta\u1e63awwur qui y sont d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A propos du trait\u00e9 al-\u1e0car\u016br [sic] f\u012b l-man\u1e6diq d'Averro\u00e8s et les termes tasd\u012bq et ta\u1e63awwur qui y sont d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"1999","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":123,"full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":474,"section_of":32,"pages":"163\u2013171","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":32,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Averroes and the Aristotelian Tradition. Sources, Constitution and Reception of the Philosophy of Ibn Rushd (1126\u20131198). Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium Averroicum (Cologne, 1996)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"1999","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1999","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":32,"pubplace":"Leiden","publisher":"Brill","series":"Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science","volume":"31","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["A propos du trait\u00e9 al-\u1e0car\u016br [sic] f\u012b l-man\u1e6diq d'Averro\u00e8s et les termes tasd\u012bq et ta\u1e63awwur qui y sont d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s"]}
Title | Abstraction and Intellection in Averroes and the Arabic Tradition: Remarks on Averroes, Long Commentary on the De anima, Book 3, Comment 36 |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 2018 |
Published in | Sujet Libre. Pour Alain de Libera |
Pages | 321–325 |
Categories | Tradition and Reception, Commentary, De anima |
Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5164","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5164,"authors_free":[{"id":5947,"entry_id":5164,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C. ","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Abstraction and Intellection in Averroes and the Arabic Tradition: Remarks on Averroes, Long Commentary on the De anima, Book 3, Comment 36","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Abstraction and Intellection in Averroes and the Arabic Tradition: Remarks on Averroes, Long Commentary on the De anima, Book 3, Comment 36"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5164,"section_of":5082,"pages":"321\u2013325","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5082,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Sujet Libre. Pour Alain de Libera","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2018","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Nous avons souhait\u00e9 ce livre pour rendre hommage \u00e0 Alain de Libera et f\u00eater son travail. Celles et ceux qui \u00e9crivent ici sont des ma\u00eetres, des pairs, des coll\u00e8gues, d\u2019anciens \u00e9tudiants; en divers sens, ce sont tous des amis.\r\nPlut\u00f4t que d\u2019imposer une pr\u00e9sentation, nous avons choisi comme ordre le hasard alphab\u00e9tique des noms, sans chapitres. Deux consignes seulement avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 fournies. La bri\u00e8vet\u00e9, d\u2019abord \u2013 quelques pages, tenues par un nombre de signes. L\u2019absence de notes, ensuite, pour livrer des textes de plain-pied.\r\nRestait, pour \u00e9voquer l\u2019\u0153uvre et la personne d\u2019Alain de Libera, l\u2019objet, l\u2019angle. Nous n\u2019avions cette fois indiqu\u00e9 qu\u2019une chose, qui donne \u00e0 ce volume son titre : sujet libre.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5082,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Vrin","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Abstraction and Intellection in Averroes and the Arabic Tradition: Remarks on Averroes, Long Commentary on the De anima, Book 3, Comment 36"]}
Title | Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad bin Rushd (Averroes) (1126–1198) |
Type | Book Section |
Language | English |
Date | 1983 |
Published in | The Genius of Arab Civilization. Source of Renaissance |
Pages | 70–71 |
Categories | Surveys, Renaissance |
Author(s) | M. A. Martin |
Publisher(s) | |
Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"985","_score":null,"_source":{"id":985,"authors_free":[{"id":1157,"entry_id":985,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1060,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"M. A. Martin","free_first_name":"M. A.","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1060,"first_name":"M. A.","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"M. A. Martin","short_ident":"MAMar","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=M. A. Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Ab\u016b al-Wal\u012bd Mu\u1e25ammad bin Rushd (Averroes) (1126\u20131198)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ab\u016b al-Wal\u012bd Mu\u1e25ammad bin Rushd (Averroes) (1126\u20131198)"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"1983","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[{"id":1060,"full_name":"M. A. Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":985,"section_of":108,"pages":"70\u201371","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":108,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"The Genius of Arab Civilization. Source of Renaissance","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"1983","edition_no":null,"free_date":"1983","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":108,"pubplace":"London","publisher":null,"series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Ab\u016b al-Wal\u012bd Mu\u1e25ammad bin Rushd (Averroes) (1126\u20131198)"]}