| Title | Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Indonesian |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 71-92 |
| Categories | Logic, Method, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Raha Bistara |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash’ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd’s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5769","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5769,"authors_free":[{"id":6682,"entry_id":5769,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Raha Bistara","free_first_name":"Raha ","free_last_name":"Bistara","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd"},"abstract":"This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash\u2019ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd\u2019s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. ","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Indonesian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5769,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama","volume":"16","issue":"2","pages":"71-92"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Plato’s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Al Masaq: Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 314-335 |
| Categories | Commentary, Plato, Politics |
| Author(s) | Tineke Melkebeek |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In his commentary on Plato’s Republic, Ibn Rushd (Averroes) discusses the case for female guardians. Besides following Socrates’s argument for female warriors, which cites the efficiency of female guard dogs, Ibn Rushd introduces an additional argument: that the female capacity for warfare is evident from the inhabitants of certain regions. Unfortunately, the precise formulation of the regions or groups he intends to mention is obscure in the existing manuscripts. Rosenthal translates “the inhabitants of deserts and frontier villages”, Lerner’s translation says “the inhabitants of deserts and the City of Women”. This article aims to analyse these and other translations of this enigmatic passage, which has not yet been the subject of study. Concerning the second region mentioned, it seems that Ibn Rushd could be indicating Northern Spain, but he might also have been alluding to the legendary places at the coldest margins of the then-known world. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5767","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5767,"authors_free":[{"id":6680,"entry_id":5767,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tineke Melkebeek","free_first_name":"Tineke ","free_last_name":"Melkebeek","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage"},"abstract":"In his commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, Ibn Rushd (Averroes) discusses the case for female guardians. Besides following Socrates\u2019s argument for female warriors, which cites the efficiency of female guard dogs, Ibn Rushd introduces an additional argument: that the female capacity for warfare is evident from the inhabitants of certain regions. Unfortunately, the precise formulation of the regions or groups he intends to mention is obscure in the existing manuscripts. Rosenthal translates \u201cthe inhabitants of deserts and frontier villages\u201d, Lerner\u2019s translation says \u201cthe inhabitants of deserts and the City of Women\u201d. This article aims to analyse these and other translations of this enigmatic passage, which has not yet been the subject of study. Concerning the second region mentioned, it seems that Ibn Rushd could be indicating Northern Spain, but he might also have been alluding to the legendary places at the coldest margins of the then-known world.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09503110.2022.2114065","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5767,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al Masaq: Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":"34 ","issue":"3","pages":"314-335"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Philosophy East and West |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 960-972 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Kirk Lougheed , Joshua Lee Harris |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5795","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5795,"authors_free":[{"id":6715,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1683,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kirk Lougheed","free_first_name":"Kirk ","free_last_name":"Lougheed","norm_person":{"id":1683,"first_name":"Kirk","last_name":"Lougheed","full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080701206","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Kirk Lougheed"}},{"id":6716,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1901,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","free_first_name":"Joshua Lee ","free_last_name":"Harris","norm_person":{"id":1901,"first_name":"Joshua Lee ","last_name":"Harris","full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080676589","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Joshua Lee Harris"}}],"entry_title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge"},"abstract":"The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1683,"full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","role":1},{"id":1901,"full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5795,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy East and West","volume":"72","issue":"4","pages":"960-972"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | History of Philosophy Quarterly |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 339-354 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Hamid Taieb |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5805","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5805,"authors_free":[{"id":6726,"entry_id":5805,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1902,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hamid Taieb","free_first_name":"Hamid ","free_last_name":"Taieb","norm_person":{"id":1902,"first_name":"Hamid ","last_name":"Taieb","full_name":"Hamid Taieb","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077921705","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Hamid Taieb"}}],"entry_title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis"},"abstract":"This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.5406\/21521026.39.4.03","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1902,"full_name":"Hamid Taieb","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5805,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"39","issue":"4","pages":"339-354"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Lecteurs arabes et latins de Thémistius au Moyen Âge: l’intellect et ses objets |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-36 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Themistius, Aquinas, Aristotle, De anima, Intellect |
| Author(s) | Elisa Coda |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle’s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5804","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5804,"authors_free":[{"id":6725,"entry_id":5804,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elisa Coda","free_first_name":"Elisa ","free_last_name":"Coda","norm_person":{"id":1738,"first_name":"Elisa","last_name":"Coda","full_name":"Elisa Coda","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1168595843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Elisa Coda"}}],"entry_title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"},"abstract":"This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle\u2019s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.1061.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":1738,"full_name":"Elisa Coda","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5804,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"106","issue":"1","pages":"3-36"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Natural Law and the Law of Moses in Jewish Averroistic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | The Journal of religion |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 354-375 |
| Categories | Jewish Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Shalom Sadik |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In order to understand the relationship between philosophy and religion, one of the major questions that must be explored is the relation between natural law and prophetic law. One of the main problems with modern research on this topic in the field of Jewish studies is that debate is relegated to the interpretation of only a few thinkers whose ideas are presumed to represent Judaism. The aim of this article is to begin remedying this issue by analyzing the relation between the Law of Moses and natural law as presented by four Jewish Averroists: Rabbis Isaac Albalag, Isaac Pulgar, Josef Ibn Kaspi, and Levi ben Abraham. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5806","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5806,"authors_free":[{"id":6727,"entry_id":5806,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shalom Sadik","free_first_name":"Shalom ","free_last_name":"Sadik","norm_person":{"id":1903,"first_name":"Shalom ","last_name":"Sadik","full_name":"Shalom Sadik","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1044411279","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shalom Sadik"}}],"entry_title":"Natural Law and the Law of Moses in Jewish Averroistic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Natural Law and the Law of Moses in Jewish Averroistic Philosophy"},"abstract":"In order to understand the relationship between philosophy and religion, one of the major questions that must be explored is the relation between natural law and prophetic law. One of the main problems with modern research on this topic in the field of Jewish studies is that debate is relegated to the interpretation of only a few thinkers whose ideas are presumed to represent Judaism. The aim of this article is to begin remedying this issue by analyzing the relation between the Law of Moses and natural law as presented by four Jewish Averroists: Rabbis Isaac Albalag, Isaac Pulgar, Josef Ibn Kaspi, and Levi ben Abraham.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/719817","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":8,"category_name":"Jewish Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Jewish Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1903,"full_name":"Shalom Sadik","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5806,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" The Journal of religion","volume":"102","issue":"3","pages":"354-375"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Culture and dialogue |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 195-201 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5803","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5803,"authors_free":[{"id":6724,"entry_id":5803,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina ","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1163\/24683949-12340117","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5803,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Culture and dialogue","volume":"10","issue":"2","pages":"195-201"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Revisiting Averroes' Influence On Western Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 174-194 |
| Categories | Averroism, Latin Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Anthony Raphael Etuk |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Better known as Averroes, Ibn Rushd remains one of the greatest Islamic philosophical geniuses of all times. The unparalleled inventiveness of his mind and the ―audacity‖ of his methods are evident in many of his innovative philosophical activities, which tremendous stirred the minds of his contemporaries in the Middle Ages. Perhaps only a few would deny the far-reaching impacts of his profound philosophical activities and ideas on Western philosophy. Prominent among these are his unique status as a paramount guide to Aristotle, based on his influential and massive commentaries on Aristotle, and his strong arguments for the compatibility of philosophy with religion. These and more, have since established the depth of his ideas and his lasting relevance in Western philosophy history. This paper undertakes an exposition of his philosophical activities, to identify the impacts of his enduring legacies on Western philosophy. The expository and hermeneutical methods of analysis are adopted. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5601","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5601,"authors_free":[{"id":6502,"entry_id":5601,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anthony Raphael Etuk","free_first_name":"Anthony Raphael ","free_last_name":"Etuk","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Revisiting Averroes' Influence On Western Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Revisiting Averroes' Influence On Western Philosophy"},"abstract":"Better known as Averroes, Ibn Rushd remains one of the greatest Islamic philosophical geniuses of all times. The unparalleled inventiveness of his mind and the \u2015audacity\u2016 of his methods are evident in many of his innovative philosophical activities, which tremendous \r\nstirred the minds of his contemporaries in the Middle Ages. Perhaps only a few would deny the far-reaching impacts of his profound philosophical activities and ideas on Western philosophy. Prominent among these are his unique status as a paramount guide to Aristotle, based on his influential and massive commentaries on Aristotle, and his \r\nstrong arguments for the compatibility of philosophy with religion. These and more, have since established the depth of his ideas and his lasting relevance in Western philosophy history. This paper undertakes an exposition of his philosophical activities, to identify the impacts of his enduring legacies on Western philosophy. The expository and hermeneutical methods of analysis are adopted. ","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.17265\/2159-5313\/2022.02.002","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5601,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research ","volume":"19 ","issue":"1","pages":"174-194"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Dialectical views on metaphysics in Islam: Thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1-6 |
| Categories | Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Aminullah Elhady |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper discusses the dialectical thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians on divine metaphysics. The discussion is based on the study of criticisms and dialogues on the theologians’ view on metaphysics. Three important points emerge: firstly, how Ibn Rushd presented the basis of his critical arguments; secondly, the process of Ibn Rushd’s methods of criticism on the theologians’ metaphysical reasons and lastly, the content of Ibn Rushd’s criticisms of the theologians’ metaphysical reason. This paper provides a detailed description of the themes as accurate and comprehensive ways to provide a basis of Ibn Rushd’s criticism. Contribution: This study contributes to encouraging and changing the views of scholars of Islamic theology that Ibn Rushd, apart from being a philosopher, is also a critical thinker in the field of Islamic theology. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5768","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5768,"authors_free":[{"id":6681,"entry_id":5768,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Aminullah Elhady","free_first_name":"Aminullah ","free_last_name":"Elhady","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Dialectical views on metaphysics in Islam: Thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Dialectical views on metaphysics in Islam: Thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians"},"abstract":"This paper discusses the dialectical thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians on divine metaphysics. The discussion is based on the study of criticisms and dialogues on the theologians\u2019 view on metaphysics. Three important points emerge: firstly, how Ibn Rushd presented the basis of his critical arguments; secondly, the process of Ibn Rushd\u2019s methods of criticism on the theologians\u2019 metaphysical reasons and lastly, the content of Ibn Rushd\u2019s criticisms of the theologians\u2019 metaphysical reason. This paper provides a detailed description of the themes as accurate and comprehensive ways to provide a basis of Ibn Rushd\u2019s criticism.\r\n\r\nContribution: This study contributes to encouraging and changing the views of scholars of Islamic theology that Ibn Rushd, apart from being a philosopher, is also a critical thinker in the field of Islamic theology.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4102\/hts.v78i4.7531","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5768,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"HTS Teologiese Studies \/ Theological Studies","volume":"78","issue":"4","pages":"1-6"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Études Juives |
| Volume | 181 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 185–222 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Gersonides, Commentary, Method |
| Author(s) | Esti Eisenmann |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes’s Epitome of Aristotle’s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides’ exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides’ methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle’s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5386,"authors_free":[{"id":6238,"entry_id":5386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Esti Eisenmann","free_first_name":"Esti","free_last_name":"Eisenmann","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics"},"abstract":"The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes\u2019s Epitome of Aristotle\u2019s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides\u2019 exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides\u2019 methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle\u2019s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.2143\/REJ.181.1.3290628","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des \u00c9tudes Juives","volume":"181","issue":"1-2","pages":"185\u2013222"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Persian |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 69-84 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Averroism, Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Ali Ghorbani , Fath ali Akbari |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Faṣl al-maqāl, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5579","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5579,"authors_free":[{"id":6476,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Ghorbani","free_first_name":"Ali ","free_last_name":"Ghorbani","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6477,"entry_id":5579,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fath ali Akbari","free_first_name":"Fath ali ","free_last_name":"Akbari","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"},"abstract":"In the thirteenth century, along with the return of the European thinkers and philosophers to Aristotelian philosophy and the emergence of the contradiction between Aristotle's philosophy and Christian teachings and religious beliefs, the church put forward a theory known as dual reality. According to this theory everything that is true in theology, its opposite can also be true in philosophy. With this theory, the church accused the philosophers of heresy, while the followers of Averroes considered themselves free of this charge. In his book Fa\u1e63l al-maq\u0101l, Averroes appeared to be in favor of the above mentioned theory in a different form. By a precise analysis of the theory through reviewing the now available sources and considering the events followed by attributing this view to the philosophers, one can infer different implications from the theory from the perspective of each of the three sides involved (i.e. Averroes, followers of Averroes and church) and the following division can be sketched: 1- ontological implications: that is to believe in the existence of two types of realities in the universe which can be described in two ways: A) two contradictory scopes in the universe B) two distinct scopes in the universe. 2- Epistemological implications of the dual reality: A) Two ways to reach one reality. B) Two dictions to narrate one reality. C) Duality of the reality in practice. D) Two levels of one single reality. By analyzing each of these implications of the dual reality, one can be led to some consequences according to which based on different works of Averroes he cannot be accused of believing in a kind of duality which makes him deserve heresy.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"Persian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5579,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"5","issue":"12","pages":"69-84"}},"sort":["A Comparative study of the theory of dual reality from the perspective of Averroes, followers of Averroes and the church of the thirteenth century"]}
| Title | A Comparison Between Khumainī's Government of the Jurist and The Commentary on Plato's Republic of Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic Studies |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 16–31 |
| Categories | Politics |
| Author(s) | Vanessa Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26195475 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"751","_score":null,"_source":{"id":751,"authors_free":[{"id":911,"entry_id":751,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":939,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Vanessa Martin","free_first_name":"Vanessa","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":939,"first_name":"Vanessa","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Vanessa Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1089137915","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/100256567","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Vanessa Martin"}}],"entry_title":"A Comparison Between Khumain\u012b's Government of the Jurist and The Commentary on Plato's Republic of Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Comparison Between Khumain\u012b's Government of the Jurist and The Commentary on Plato's Republic of Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26195475","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":939,"full_name":"Vanessa Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":751,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"7","issue":"1","pages":"16\u201331"}},"sort":["A Comparison Between Khumain\u012b's Government of the Jurist and The Commentary on Plato's Republic of Ibn Rushd"]}
| Title | A Further Word regarding Arabic Influences on Borges |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1969 |
| Journal | Hispania |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 417-419 |
| Categories | Influence |
| Author(s) | Erika Spivakovsky |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/337895 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5691","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5691,"authors_free":[{"id":6597,"entry_id":5691,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Erika Spivakovsky","free_first_name":"Erika ","free_last_name":"Spivakovsky","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Further Word regarding Arabic Influences on Borges","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Further Word regarding Arabic Influences on Borges"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1969","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/337895","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5691,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hispania","volume":"52","issue":"3","pages":"417-419 "}},"sort":["A Further Word regarding Arabic Influences on Borges"]}
| Title | A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes’ Recourse to Avicenna’s Madkhal of the Shifâ’ in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 29 |
| Pages | 125–136 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Silvia Di Vincenzo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5144","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5144,"authors_free":[{"id":5923,"entry_id":5144,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Di Vincenzo","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Di Vincenzo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes\u2019 Recourse to Avicenna\u2019s Madkhal of the Shif\u00e2\u2019 in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry\u2019s Isagoge","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes\u2019 Recourse to Avicenna\u2019s Madkhal of the Shif\u00e2\u2019 in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry\u2019s Isagoge"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5144,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"29","issue":"","pages":"125\u2013136"}},"sort":["A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes\u2019 Recourse to Avicenna\u2019s Madkhal of the Shif\u00e2\u2019 in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry\u2019s Isagoge"]}
| Title | A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The ‘Decisive Treatise’ of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Peripatetikos |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 1-25 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Law, Theology |
| Author(s) | Thérèse Bonin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5337","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5337,"authors_free":[{"id":6183,"entry_id":5337,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1785,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","free_first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se ","free_last_name":"Bonin","norm_person":{"id":1785,"first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se","last_name":"Bonin","full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1197840044","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin"}}],"entry_title":"A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1785,"full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se Bonin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5337,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Peripatetikos","volume":"6 ","issue":"","pages":"1-25"}},"sort":["A Muslim Perspective on Philosophy and Religion: The \u2018Decisive Treatise\u2019 of Averroes"]}
| Title | A New Manuscript Source for Pomponazzi's Theory of the Soul from his Paduan Period |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1951 |
| Journal | Revue Internationale de Philosophie |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 16 (2) |
| Pages | 144-157 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Averroism, Latin Averroism, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Paul Oskar Kristeller |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23932355 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5641","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5641,"authors_free":[{"id":6546,"entry_id":5641,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":463,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Paul Oskar Kristeller","free_first_name":"Paul Oskar ","free_last_name":"Kristeller","norm_person":{"id":463,"first_name":"Paul Oskar","last_name":"Kristeller","full_name":"Paul Oskar Kristeller","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11877803X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/56612115","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd11877803X.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Paul Oskar Kristeller"}}],"entry_title":"A New Manuscript Source for Pomponazzi's Theory of the Soul from his Paduan Period","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A New Manuscript Source for Pomponazzi's Theory of the Soul from his Paduan Period"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1951","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23932355","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":463,"full_name":"Paul Oskar Kristeller","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5641,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue Internationale de Philosophie","volume":"5","issue":"16 (2) ","pages":"144-157"}},"sort":["A New Manuscript Source for Pomponazzi's Theory of the Soul from his Paduan Period"]}
| Title | A Theory of Judgment in Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Arab Studies Quarterly |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | No. 3 (Summer 2021) |
| Pages | 268–281 |
| Categories | Linguistics, Politics, Rhetoric, Law, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Rayyan Dabbous |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5404","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5404,"authors_free":[{"id":6265,"entry_id":5404,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rayyan Dabbous","free_first_name":"Rayyan","free_last_name":"Dabbous","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Theory of Judgment in Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Theory of Judgment in Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.13169\/arabstudquar.43.3.0268","doi_url":"10.2307\/j50005550 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5404,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arab Studies Quarterly","volume":"43","issue":"No. 3 (Summer 2021)","pages":"268\u2013281"}},"sort":["A Theory of Judgment in Averroes"]}
| Title | A critical edition of Averroes' De Caelo et Mundo |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1960 |
| Journal | The American Philosophy Society. Year Book |
| Pages | 515-516 |
| Categories | Cosmology |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Francis J. Carmody |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1688","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1688,"authors_free":[{"id":1949,"entry_id":1688,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":1950,"entry_id":1688,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":179,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Francis J. Carmody","free_first_name":"Francis J.","free_last_name":"Carmody","norm_person":{"id":179,"first_name":"Francis J.","last_name":"Carmody","full_name":"Francis J. Carmody","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/128675101","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/210453255","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francis J. Carmody"}}],"entry_title":"A critical edition of Averroes' De Caelo et Mundo","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A critical edition of Averroes' De Caelo et Mundo"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1960","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":179,"full_name":"Francis J. Carmody","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1688,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The American Philosophy Society. Year Book","volume":null,"issue":null,"pages":"515-516"}},"sort":["A critical edition of Averroes' De Caelo et Mundo"]}
| Title | A essência da matéria prima em Averróis Latino (con una referência a Henrique de Gand) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 1/4 |
| Pages | 197–221 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Latin Averroism |
| Author(s) | Mário A. Santiago de Carvalho |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40419416 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"600","_score":null,"_source":{"id":600,"authors_free":[{"id":751,"entry_id":600,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":846,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"M\u00e1rio A. Santiago de Carvalho","free_first_name":"M\u00e1rio A.","free_last_name":"Santiago de Carvalho","norm_person":{"id":846,"first_name":"M\u00e1rio A.","last_name":"Santiago de Carvalho","full_name":"M\u00e1rio A. Santiago de Carvalho","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103289122X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/6944877","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=M\u00e1rio A. Santiago de Carvalho"}}],"entry_title":"A ess\u00eancia da mat\u00e9ria prima em Averr\u00f3is Latino (con una refer\u00eancia a Henrique de Gand)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A ess\u00eancia da mat\u00e9ria prima em Averr\u00f3is Latino (con una refer\u00eancia a Henrique de Gand)"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"Portuguese","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/40419416","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":846,"full_name":"M\u00e1rio A. Santiago de Carvalho","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":600,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"52","issue":"1\/4","pages":"197\u2013221"}},"sort":["A ess\u00eancia da mat\u00e9ria prima em Averr\u00f3is Latino (con una refer\u00eancia a Henrique de Gand)"]}
| Title | A propos de fondamental et de l'essentiel dans le commentaire d'Averroès sur la Métaphysique d'Aristote |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Revue de philosophie ancienne |
| Volume | 13 |
| Pages | 225–238 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Laurence Bauloye |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"545","_score":null,"_source":{"id":545,"authors_free":[{"id":692,"entry_id":545,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":814,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laurence Bauloye","free_first_name":"Laurence","free_last_name":"Bauloye","norm_person":{"id":814,"first_name":"Laurence","last_name":"Bauloye","full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/152664165","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59337898","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laurence Bauloye"}}],"entry_title":"A propos de fondamental et de l'essentiel dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la M\u00e9taphysique d'Aristote","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"A propos de fondamental et de l'essentiel dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la M\u00e9taphysique d'Aristote"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":814,"full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":545,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue de philosophie ancienne","volume":"13","issue":null,"pages":"225\u2013238"}},"sort":["A propos de fondamental et de l'essentiel dans le commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s sur la M\u00e9taphysique d'Aristote"]}