| Title | Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 93–103 |
| Categories | Renaissance, Tradition and Reception, Psychology, Ethics |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Les spécialistes ont longtemps accusé Pietro Pomponazzi d’utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour échapper à la censure de l’Église au sujet de ses thèses sur la mortalité de l’âme et le fondement matériel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus témoigne non pas d’une promotion de la duperie mais plutôt d’une cohérence entre sa compréhension de l’utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compréhension de l’entendement humain, de l’âme et de la nature de la moralité. Ces thèses dépendent en partie de sa lecture d’Averroès. En particulier, il était d’avis que l’écriture n’était porteuse ni de vérité ni de fausseté au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s’écarta d’Averroès parce que son rejet de la psychologie était mêlé d’une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu’il considérait comme étant éloignée de l’intellection et incapable d’obtenir la vérité. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/544 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5054","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5054,"authors_free":[{"id":5804,"entry_id":5054,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture"},"abstract":"Les sp\u00e9cialistes ont longtemps accus\u00e9 Pietro Pomponazzi d\u2019utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour \u00e9chapper \u00e0 la censure de l\u2019\u00c9glise au sujet de ses th\u00e8ses sur la mortalit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e2me et le fondement mat\u00e9riel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus t\u00e9moigne non pas d\u2019une promotion de la duperie mais plut\u00f4t d\u2019une coh\u00e9rence entre sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019entendement humain, de l\u2019\u00e2me et de la nature de la moralit\u00e9. Ces th\u00e8ses d\u00e9pendent en partie de sa lecture d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. En particulier, il \u00e9tait d\u2019avis que l\u2019\u00e9criture n\u2019\u00e9tait porteuse ni de v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ni de fausset\u00e9 au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s\u2019\u00e9carta d\u2019Averro\u00e8s parce que son rejet de la psychologie \u00e9tait m\u00eal\u00e9 d\u2019une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu\u2019il consid\u00e9rait comme \u00e9tant \u00e9loign\u00e9e de l\u2019intellection et incapable d\u2019obtenir la v\u00e9rit\u00e9.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/544","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5054,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"93\u2013103"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | La position de Zabarella vis-à-vis d’Averroès dans son Commentaire sur le De anima |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 105–135 |
| Categories | Renaissance, Tradition and Reception, Commentary, De anima |
| Author(s) | Jules Janssens |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Dans son commentaire sur le De anima d’Aristote Zabarella fait un usage non négligeable du Grand Commentaire sur le même ouvrage d’Averroès, le grand penseur andalou. On a pris l’habitude de considérer que Zabarella n’a pas pu finaliser son commentaire, étant donné qu’il fut publié à titre posthume. Il s’agirait donc d’un ouvrage incomplet. Toutefois, si on tient compte du fait que Zabarella s’intéresse avant tout, voire presque exclusivement, à l’étude de l’âme humaine, tout indique qu’il a consciemment choisi de ne pas commenter certains chapitres de l’ouvrage du Stagirite. Quant à l’impact d’Averroès sur la doctrine de l’âme exposée par Zabarella, elle a été diversement évaluée dans la recherche contemporaine, mais dans l’ensemble on y perçoit une attitude fortement critique du dernier envers le premier. Il est nécessaire de nuancer ce jugement. En effet, sur la base de trois fragments, répartis sur les trois livres, la présente recherche met en lumière qu’Averroès est considéré par Zabarella comme une vraie autorité, « auctoritas » ; que Zabarella souscrit parfois pleinement à l’interprétation du maître arabe ; et, enfin, que Zabarella explique certaines explications « erronées » de ce dernier comme l’effet inévitable de la traduction fautive du texte aristotélicien dont Averroès disposait. En somme, l’attitude de Zabarella vis-à-vis d’Averroès s’avère complexe, évitant aussi bien l’excès d’un rejet total que celui d’une acceptation aveugle. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/545 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5051","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5051,"authors_free":[{"id":5801,"entry_id":5051,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":655,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jules Janssens","free_first_name":"Jules","free_last_name":"Janssens","norm_person":{"id":655,"first_name":"Jules","last_name":"Janssens","full_name":"Jules Janssens","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139312471","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/81614","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd139312471.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jules Janssens"}}],"entry_title":"La position de Zabarella vis-\u00e0-vis d\u2019Averro\u00e8s dans son Commentaire sur le De anima","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La position de Zabarella vis-\u00e0-vis d\u2019Averro\u00e8s dans son Commentaire sur le De anima"},"abstract":"Dans son commentaire sur le De anima d\u2019Aristote Zabarella fait un usage non n\u00e9gligeable du Grand Commentaire sur le m\u00eame ouvrage d\u2019Averro\u00e8s, le grand penseur andalou. On a pris l\u2019habitude de consid\u00e9rer que Zabarella n\u2019a pas pu finaliser son commentaire, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 qu\u2019il fut publi\u00e9 \u00e0 titre posthume. Il s\u2019agirait donc d\u2019un ouvrage incomplet. Toutefois, si on tient compte du fait que Zabarella s\u2019int\u00e9resse avant tout, voire presque exclusivement, \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tude de l\u2019\u00e2me humaine, tout indique qu\u2019il a consciemment choisi de ne pas commenter certains chapitres de l\u2019ouvrage du Stagirite. Quant \u00e0 l\u2019impact d\u2019Averro\u00e8s sur la doctrine de l\u2019\u00e2me expos\u00e9e par Zabarella, elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 diversement \u00e9valu\u00e9e dans la recherche contemporaine, mais dans l\u2019ensemble on y per\u00e7oit une attitude fortement critique du dernier envers le premier. Il est n\u00e9cessaire de nuancer ce jugement. En effet, sur la base de trois fragments, r\u00e9partis sur les trois livres, la pr\u00e9sente recherche met en lumi\u00e8re qu\u2019Averro\u00e8s est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 par Zabarella comme une vraie autorit\u00e9, \u00ab auctoritas \u00bb ; que Zabarella souscrit parfois pleinement \u00e0 l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation du ma\u00eetre arabe ; et, enfin, que Zabarella explique certaines explications \u00ab erron\u00e9es \u00bb de ce dernier comme l\u2019effet in\u00e9vitable de la traduction fautive du texte aristot\u00e9licien dont Averro\u00e8s disposait. En somme, l\u2019attitude de Zabarella vis-\u00e0-vis d\u2019Averro\u00e8s s\u2019av\u00e8re complexe, \u00e9vitant aussi bien l\u2019exc\u00e8s d\u2019un rejet total que celui d\u2019une acceptation aveugle.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/545","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":655,"full_name":"Jules Janssens","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5051,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"105\u2013135"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | حل ابن رشد لإشكالية القوة اللامتناهية في الجسم السماوي |
| Transcription | ḥal Ibn Rušd l-iškāliya al-quwq al-la-mutanāhiya fi-l-ǧism as-samāwy |
| Translation | Averroes’ Solution of the Problem of Infinite Force in The Celestial Body |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2021 |
| Categories | Science, Cosmology |
| Author(s) | Ashraf Mansour |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5063","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5063,"authors_free":[{"id":5819,"entry_id":5063,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ashraf Mansour","free_first_name":"Ashraf ","free_last_name":"Mansour","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"\u062d\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0644\u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0627\u0645\u062a\u0646\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0648\u064a","title_transcript":"\u1e25al Ibn Ru\u0161d l-i\u0161k\u0101liya al-quwq al-la-mutan\u0101hiya fi-l-\u01e7ism as-sam\u0101wy","title_translation":"Averroes\u2019 Solution of the Problem of Infinite Force in The Celestial Body","main_title":{"title":"\u062d\u0644 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0644\u0625\u0634\u0643\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0648\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0627\u0645\u062a\u0646\u0627\u0647\u064a\u0629 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0633\u0645\u0627\u0648\u064a"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":56,"category_name":"Science","link":"bib?categories[]=Science"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Averroes ex Averroe: Uncovering Ṭodros Ṭodrosi’s Method of Commenting on the Commentator |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 7-78 |
| Categories | Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Steven Harvey , Oded Horezky |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Our paper studies one of the most interesting manuscripts of medieval Jewish philosophy, a unicum that is housed in the British Library, Heb MS Add 27559. This fascinating manuscript, in part a version of a work compiled by Ṭodros Ṭodrosi, in Trinquetaille in the 1330s, is a Hebrew anthology of logical and scientific texts, written by Greek and Arabic philosophers, some of which are translated into Hebrew for the first time by Ṭodros. The paper sheds new light on this manuscript through an examination of the section on natural science that Ṭodros devoted to the study and explanation of Aristotle’s Physics and which comprises more than a third of the entire manuscript. We uncover Ṭodros’s aims and methodology in this section on physics (and, to some extent, in other sections as well), and sketch a clear picture of the ways in which Ṭodros intended to assist his contemporary readers in the study of natural science. The paper contributes to our knowledge of the fundamental status of Averroes’s middle commentaries on the Corpus Aristotelicum among medieval Jewish scholars, as well as to our growing awareness and appreciation of the achievements of a remarkable, young, fourteenth-century Provençal scholar, Ṭodros Ṭodrosi. It concludes with three appendices, two of which compare Ṭodros’s text with parallel passages in the Hebrew translations of Averroes’s commentaries, and a third which provides a detailed description of the British Library manuscript. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5576","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5576,"authors_free":[{"id":6470,"entry_id":5576,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":642,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steven Harvey","free_first_name":"Steven ","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":642,"first_name":"Steven","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Steven Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051482674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97890242","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Steven Harvey"}},{"id":6471,"entry_id":5576,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Oded Horezky","free_first_name":"Oded ","free_last_name":"Horezky","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averroes ex Averroe: Uncovering \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi\u2019s Method of Commenting on the Commentator","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes ex Averroe: Uncovering \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi\u2019s Method of Commenting on the Commentator"},"abstract":"Our paper studies one of the most interesting manuscripts of medieval Jewish philosophy, a unicum that is housed in the British Library, Heb MS Add 27559. This fascinating \r\nmanuscript, in part a version of a work compiled by \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi, in Trinquetaille in the 1330s, is a Hebrew anthology of logical and scientific texts, written by Greek and Arabic \r\nphilosophers, some of which are translated into Hebrew for the first time by \u1e6codros. The paper sheds new light on this manuscript through an examination of the section on natural science that \u1e6codros devoted to the study and explanation of Aristotle\u2019s Physics and which comprises more than a third of the entire manuscript. We uncover \u1e6codros\u2019s aims and methodology in this section on physics (and, to some extent, in other sections as well), and sketch a clear picture of the ways in which \u1e6codros intended to assist his contemporary readers in the study of natural science. The paper contributes to our knowledge of the fundamental status of Averroes\u2019s middle commentaries on the Corpus Aristotelicum\r\namong medieval Jewish scholars, as well as to our growing awareness and appreciation of the achievements of a remarkable, young, fourteenth-century Proven\u00e7al scholar, \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi. It concludes with three appendices, two of which compare \u1e6codros\u2019s \r\ntext with parallel passages in the Hebrew translations of Averroes\u2019s commentaries, and a third which provides a detailed description of the British Library manuscript.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":642,"full_name":"Steven Harvey","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5576,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism","volume":"21","issue":"1","pages":"7-78"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Akılsal Zorunluluk ve Dinî Meşruiyet Bağlamında İbn Rüşd’ün Felsefe Savunusu |
| Translation | The Defense of Philosophy According to Averroes in the Context of Rational Necessity and Religious Legitimacy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Turkish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi |
| Volume | 9 (İDEKTA) |
| Pages | 131-139 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Rafiz Manafov , Adem Akman |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| İbn Rüşd İslam düşüncesinin akli temellerinin ve felsefi düşüncenin gerilemeye yüz tuttuğu bir dönemin filozofudur. O, felsefi açıdan dinin konumunu gerekli gördüğü kadar, din açısından da felsefenin kaçınılmazlığına inanır. Çalışmamızın özünü ve amacını İbn Rüşd’ün felsefesindeki temel kavram ve düşünceler oluşturmaktadır. Makalede felsefenin İbn Rüşd açısından akli zorunluluk ve dinsel meşruiyeti sorgulanmakta, felsefi ve dini veriler ışığında değerlendirilmektedir. Dinsel veriler ve rasyonel gereklilik bağlamında İbn Rüşd’ün felsefe savunusunun özellikleri ortaya konmakta ve önemi vurgulanmaktadır. Averroes is a philosopher of an era in which the rational foundations of Islamic thought weakening, and the philosophical mind was on the verge of decline. He regards the position of religion as possible and necessary in terms of philosophy, he sees philosophical activity necessary in terms of religion. The purpose and essence of our study based on the main principles and defenses of philosophy of Averroes. It discusses the rational necessity and religious legitimacy of philosophy in the context of Averroes’ defense of philosophy. It focuses on importance of philosophy in the eyes of Averroes and how he legitimize philosophy in terms of religion. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5578","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5578,"authors_free":[{"id":6474,"entry_id":5578,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rafiz Manafov","free_first_name":"Rafiz ","free_last_name":"Manafov","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6475,"entry_id":5578,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Adem Akman","free_first_name":"Adem ","free_last_name":"Akman","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Ak\u0131lsal Zorunluluk ve Din\u00ee Me\u015fruiyet Ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Felsefe Savunusu","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The Defense of Philosophy According to Averroes in the Context of Rational Necessity and Religious Legitimacy","main_title":{"title":"Ak\u0131lsal Zorunluluk ve Din\u00ee Me\u015fruiyet Ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Felsefe Savunusu"},"abstract":"\u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd \u0130slam d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesinin akli temellerinin ve felsefi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncenin gerilemeye y\u00fcz tuttu\u011fu bir d\u00f6nemin filozofudur. O, felsefi a\u00e7\u0131dan dinin konumunu gerekli g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kadar, din a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da felsefenin ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131na inan\u0131r. \u00c7al\u0131\u015fmam\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc ve amac\u0131n\u0131 \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn felsefesindeki temel kavram ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceler olu\u015fturmaktad\u0131r. Makalede felsefenin \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan akli zorunluluk ve dinsel me\u015fruiyeti sorgulanmakta, felsefi ve dini veriler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmektedir. Dinsel veriler ve rasyonel gereklilik ba\u011flam\u0131nda \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn felsefe savunusunun \u00f6zellikleri ortaya konmakta ve \u00f6nemi vurgulanmaktad\u0131r.\r\n\r\nAverroes is a philosopher of an era in which the rational foundations of Islamic thought weakening, and the philosophical mind was on the verge of decline. He regards the position of religion as possible and necessary in terms of philosophy, he sees philosophical activity necessary in terms of religion. The purpose and essence of our study based on the main principles and defenses of philosophy of Averroes. It discusses the rational necessity and religious legitimacy of philosophy in the context of Averroes\u2019 defense of philosophy. It focuses on importance of philosophy in the eyes of Averroes and how he legitimize philosophy in terms of religion.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Turkish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18506\/anemon.906725","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5578,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anemon Mu\u015f Alparslan \u00dcniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi ","volume":" 9 (\u0130DEKTA)","issue":"","pages":"131-139"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Jean-Baptiste Brenet, Averroes el inquietante. Traducción de Ángela Ávalos |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Ideas y Valores |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue | 177 |
| Pages | 189-191 |
| Categories | Review |
| Author(s) | Juan Vicente Cortés |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5580","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5580,"authors_free":[{"id":6478,"entry_id":5580,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1850,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Juan Vicente Cort\u00e9s","free_first_name":"Juan Vicente ","free_last_name":"Cort\u00e9s","norm_person":{"id":1850,"first_name":"Juan Vicente ","last_name":"Cort\u00e9s","full_name":"Juan Vicente Cort\u00e9s","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1150983515","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Juan Vicente Cort\u00e9s"}}],"entry_title":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet, Averroes el inquietante. Traduccio\u0301n de A\u0301ngela A\u0301valos","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet, Averroes el inquietante. Traduccio\u0301n de A\u0301ngela A\u0301valos"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"http:\/\/doi.org\/10.15446\/ideasyvalores.v 70n 17 7.8 4 2 0 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"}],"authors":[{"id":1850,"full_name":"Juan Vicente Cort\u00e9s","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5580,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ideas y Valores","volume":"70","issue":"177","pages":"189-191"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | İbn Rüşd’ün Tanrı’ya cevher demesinin neden ve sonuçları |
| Translation | The reasons for and the consequences of Averroes’ saying essence to God |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Turkish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Turkish Academic Research Review |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1035-1052 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Cosmology |
| Author(s) | Fevzi Yiğit |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Bu makalede, İbn Rüşd’ün Tanrı’ya cevher demesinin görece neden ve sonuçları konu edilmektedir. Böylece İbn Rüşd örneğinden hareketle, filozofların Tanrı telakkilerinin aslında metafiziğin konusuyla doğrudan bağlantılı olduğu gösterilmek istenmektedir. Makalede bilkuvve-bilfiil, cevher-araz, varlık-mâhiyet, madde-sûret ve teşkîk gibi güçlü felsefî ayrımlara ihtiyaç duyuldukça başvurulacaktır. İbn Rüşd’e göre mevcut/var olan araştırması temelde bir cevher araştırmasıdır. Mevcut kavramı cevherin üstünde yer alan daha üst bir varlık seviyesini temsil etmese de kapsamının genişliği yüzünden cevherden daha üst bir kavramdır. Oysaki İbn Sînâ’ya göre mevcut, cevherden daha üst bir varlık seviyesini karşılar ve bu yüzden mevcut araştırması sadece cevher araştırmasına hasredilemez. Dolayısıyla ona göre metafiziğin konusu cevher olması açısından cevher değildir. İbn Rüşd’ün Tanrı’ya cevher demesinin muhtemel nedenleri şunlardır: Birincisi, Tanrı bütün mevcudat içerisinde cevher tanımına en uygun olandır. İkincisi onun mevcut kavramını -diğer anlamlarını akılda tutmak kaydıyla- dış dünyada gerçekliği olmayan zihinsel bir kavram yani cins olarak kabul etmesi dolayısıyla sadece cevhere gerçeklik tanımış olmasıdır. Üçüncüsü, göksel cisimlerin sonsuz bir biçimde hareket ettiği düşüncesidir. Dördüncüsü tümeller ve ayrık mevcutlar ile hissedilir ferdi cevherler arasındaki ilişkiye dair görüşüdür. İbn Rüşd Aristoteles’i takiben tümellerin ve ideaların ferdi cevherlerin varoluşunda katkısı olmadığını düşünür. İbn Rüşd’ün Tanrı’ya cevher demesinin muhtemel sonuçlarıysa şunlardır: Birincisi onun din felsefe ilişkisine dair yazdığı Faslü’l-makâl ve el-Keşf an menâhicü’ledille kitaplarında Tanrı hakkında takındığı Hanbeli tavırdır. İkincisi aslında yukarıda sebep olarak zikredilen burada ise sonuç olarak dile getirilebilecek döngüsel bir şeydir. Yani gök cisimleri ve âlemi ezeli olarak kabul etmek Tanrı’ya cevher denmesine sebep olurken Tanrı’ya cevher denmesi de âlemin Tanrı’nın etkisiyle ancak O’ndan ayrı ve kopuk olarak mevcut olması fikrini sonuç vermektedir. Üçüncüsü sudûr ve yoktan yaratma doktrinlerini reddetmesidir. Yoktan yaratmayı reddi ise -antik filozofların da açıkça dile getirdiği üzere- “salt yokluğun varlığın kaynağı olamayacağı “şeklindeki genel bir ontolojik ilkeye dayanmaktadır. This article deals with the relative reasons and consequences of Averroes’ saying God the essence. Thus, based on the example of Averroes, it is desired to show that the philosophers’ conception of God is actually directly related to the subject of metaphysics. The distinctions between potential and actual, being-essence and matter-form, which are thought to have strong forms of explanation, will be applied when needed. According to Averroes, his research of being is basically an investigation of essence. Although the concept of being/existence does not represent a higher level of being above the substance, it takes place in metaphysics as a higher concept with different meanings. However, according to Ibn Avicenna, the existing meets a higher level of being than the substance, and therefore its inquiry cannot be only the one for substance. Therefore, according to him, the subject of metaphysics is not a substance qua substance. In short, the possible reasons for Averroes to call God essence are as follows: First, God is the most suitable for the definition of essence in all existence. The second is that, keeping other meanings of being in mind, he accepted the concept of “mawjūd” as a mental concept that has no reality in the external world, that is, as a genus, and therefore only recognized the substance as reality. The third is the idea that the celestial bodies move endlessly. The fourth is his view on the relationship between universals and discrete entities and tangible individual essences. Following Aristotle, Averroes thinks that universals and ideas do not contribute to the existence of individual essences. The possible consequences of Averroes’ calling God a substance are as follows: The first is his Hanbalī attitude towards God in his books Fasl al-maqāl and al-Kashf an manāhij al-adilla, which he wrote on the relationship between religion and philosophy. Secondly, what was mentioned above as a cause, is a cyclical thing that can be expressed as a result here. In other words, while accepting the celestial bodies and the universe as eternal, causes God to be called essence, calling God essence results in the idea that the universe exists only apart and disconnected from him under the influence of God. The third is his rejection of the doctrines of creation out of nothing and sudūr (emanation). The refusal to create out of nothing is based on a general ontological principle -as the ancient philosophers openly expressed- “absolute absence cannot be the source of existence”. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5582","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5582,"authors_free":[{"id":6480,"entry_id":5582,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fevzi Yi\u011fit","free_first_name":"Fevzi","free_last_name":"Yi\u011fit","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"\u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin neden ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The reasons for and the consequences of Averroes\u2019 saying essence to God","main_title":{"title":"\u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin neden ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131"},"abstract":"Bu makalede, \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin g\u00f6rece neden ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 konu edilmektedir. B\u00f6ylece \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd \u00f6rne\u011finden hareketle, filozoflar\u0131n Tanr\u0131 telakkilerinin asl\u0131nda metafizi\u011fin konusuyla do\u011frudan ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6sterilmek istenmektedir. Makalede bilkuvve-bilfiil, cevher-araz, varl\u0131k-m\u00e2hiyet, madde-s\u00fbret ve te\u015fk\u00eek gibi g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc felsef\u00ee ayr\u0131mlara ihtiya\u00e7 duyulduk\u00e7a ba\u015fvurulacakt\u0131r. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019e g\u00f6re mevcut\/var olan ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 temelde bir cevher ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131d\u0131r. Mevcut kavram\u0131 cevherin \u00fcst\u00fcnde yer alan daha \u00fcst bir varl\u0131k seviyesini temsil etmese de kapsam\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fli\u011fi y\u00fcz\u00fcnden cevherden daha \u00fcst bir kavramd\u0131r. Oysaki \u0130bn S\u00een\u00e2\u2019ya g\u00f6re mevcut, cevherden daha \u00fcst bir varl\u0131k seviyesini kar\u015f\u0131lar ve bu y\u00fczden mevcut ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 sadece cevher ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131na hasredilemez. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ona g\u00f6re metafizi\u011fin konusu cevher olmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan cevher de\u011fildir. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin muhtemel nedenleri \u015funlard\u0131r: Birincisi, Tanr\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn mevcudat i\u00e7erisinde cevher tan\u0131m\u0131na en uygun oland\u0131r. \u0130kincisi onun mevcut kavram\u0131n\u0131 -di\u011fer anlamlar\u0131n\u0131 ak\u0131lda tutmak kayd\u0131yla- d\u0131\u015f d\u00fcnyada ger\u00e7ekli\u011fi olmayan zihinsel bir kavram yani cins olarak kabul etmesi dolay\u0131s\u0131yla sadece cevhere ger\u00e7eklik tan\u0131m\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc, g\u00f6ksel cisimlerin sonsuz bir bi\u00e7imde hareket etti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesidir. D\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc t\u00fcmeller ve ayr\u0131k mevcutlar ile hissedilir ferdi cevherler aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiye dair g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcd\u00fcr. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd Aristoteles\u2019i takiben t\u00fcmellerin ve idealar\u0131n ferdi cevherlerin varolu\u015funda katk\u0131s\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcr. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd\u2019\u00fcn Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher demesinin muhtemel sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ysa \u015funlard\u0131r: Birincisi onun din felsefe ili\u015fkisine dair yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 Fasl\u00fc\u2019l-mak\u00e2l ve el-Ke\u015ff an men\u00e2hic\u00fc\u2019ledille kitaplar\u0131nda Tanr\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tak\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 Hanbeli tav\u0131rd\u0131r. \u0130kincisi asl\u0131nda yukar\u0131da sebep olarak zikredilen burada ise sonu\u00e7 olarak dile getirilebilecek d\u00f6ng\u00fcsel bir \u015feydir. Yani g\u00f6k cisimleri ve \u00e2lemi ezeli olarak kabul etmek Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher denmesine sebep olurken Tanr\u0131\u2019ya cevher denmesi de \u00e2lemin Tanr\u0131\u2019n\u0131n etkisiyle ancak O\u2019ndan ayr\u0131 ve kopuk olarak mevcut olmas\u0131 fikrini sonu\u00e7 vermektedir. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fcs\u00fc sud\u00fbr ve yoktan yaratma doktrinlerini reddetmesidir. Yoktan yaratmay\u0131 reddi ise -antik filozoflar\u0131n da a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dile getirdi\u011fi \u00fczere- \u201csalt yoklu\u011fun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n kayna\u011f\u0131 olamayaca\u011f\u0131 \u201c\u015feklindeki genel bir ontolojik ilkeye dayanmaktad\u0131r.\r\n \r\nThis article deals with the relative reasons and consequences of Averroes\u2019 saying God the essence. Thus, based on the example of Averroes, it is desired to show that the philosophers\u2019 conception of God is actually directly related to the subject of metaphysics. The distinctions between potential and actual, being-essence and matter-form, which are thought to have strong forms of explanation, will be applied when needed. According to Averroes, his research of being is basically an investigation of essence. Although the concept of being\/existence does not represent a higher level of being above the substance, it takes place in metaphysics as a higher concept with different meanings. However, according to Ibn Avicenna, the existing meets a higher level of being than the substance, and therefore its inquiry cannot be only the one for substance. Therefore, according to him, the subject of metaphysics is not a substance qua substance. In short, the possible reasons for Averroes to call God essence are as follows: First, God is the most suitable for the definition of essence in all existence. The second is that, keeping other meanings of being in mind, he accepted the concept of \u201cmawj\u016bd\u201d as a mental concept that has no reality in the external world, that is, as a genus, and therefore only recognized the substance as reality. The third is the idea that the celestial bodies move endlessly. The fourth is his view on the relationship between universals and discrete entities and tangible individual essences. Following Aristotle, Averroes thinks that universals and ideas do not contribute to the existence of individual essences. The possible consequences of Averroes\u2019 calling God a substance are as follows: The first is his Hanbal\u012b attitude towards God in his books Fasl al-maq\u0101l and al-Kashf an man\u0101hij al-adilla, which he wrote on the relationship between religion and philosophy. Secondly, what was mentioned above as a cause, is a cyclical thing that can be expressed as a result here. In other words, while accepting the celestial bodies and the universe as eternal, causes God to be called essence, calling God essence results in the idea that the universe exists only apart and disconnected from him under the influence of God. The third is his rejection of the doctrines of creation out of nothing and sud\u016br (emanation). The refusal to create out of nothing is based on a general ontological principle -as the ancient philosophers openly expressed- \u201cabsolute absence cannot be the source of existence\u201d.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Turkish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/20.500.11787\/6522","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5582,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Turkish Academic Research Review","volume":"6","issue":"3","pages":"1035-1052"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | The medieval Islamic commentary on Plato’s republic: Ibn Rushd’s perspective on the position and potential of women |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Islamology |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 9-23 |
| Categories | Commentary, Plato, Politics, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Tineke Melkebeek |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper investigates the twelfth-century commentary on Plato’s Republic by the Andalusian Muslim philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes). Ibn Rushd is considered to be the only Muslim philosopher who commented on the Republic. Written around 375 BC, Plato’s Republic discusses the order and character of a just city-state and contains revolutionary ideas on the position and qualities of women, which remained contested also in Ibn Rushd’s time. This Muslim philosopher is primarily known as the most esteemed commentator of Aristotle. However, for the lack of an Arabic translation of Aristotle’s Politics, Ibn Rushd commented on the political theory of Aristotle’s teacher, i.e. Plato’s Republic, instead. In his commentary, Ibn Rushd juxtaposes examples from Plato’s context and those from contemporary Muslim societies. Notably, when he diverges from the text, he does not drift off toward more patriarchal, Aristotelian interpretations. On the contrary, he argues that women are capable of being rulers and philosophers, that their true competencies remain unknown as long as they are deprived of education, and that this situation is detrimental to the flourishing of the city. This article aims to critically analyse Ibn Rushd’s statements on the position of women, as well as their reception in scholarly literature. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5808","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5808,"authors_free":[{"id":6729,"entry_id":5808,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tineke Melkebeek","free_first_name":"Tineke ","free_last_name":"Melkebeek","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"The medieval Islamic commentary on Plato\u2019s republic: Ibn Rushd\u2019s perspective on the position and potential of women","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The medieval Islamic commentary on Plato\u2019s republic: Ibn Rushd\u2019s perspective on the position and potential of women"},"abstract":"This paper investigates the twelfth-century commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic by the Andalusian Muslim philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes). Ibn Rushd is considered to be the only Muslim philosopher who commented on the Republic. Written around 375 BC, Plato\u2019s Republic discusses the order and character of a just city-state and contains revolutionary ideas on the position and qualities of women, which remained contested also in Ibn Rushd\u2019s time. This Muslim philosopher is primarily known as the most esteemed commentator of Aristotle. However, for the lack of an Arabic translation of Aristotle\u2019s Politics, Ibn Rushd commented on the political theory of Aristotle\u2019s teacher, i.e. Plato\u2019s Republic, instead. In his commentary, Ibn Rushd juxtaposes examples from Plato\u2019s context and those from contemporary Muslim societies. Notably, when he diverges from the text, he does not drift off toward more patriarchal, Aristotelian interpretations. On the contrary, he argues that women are capable of being rulers and philosophers, that their true competencies remain unknown as long as they are deprived of education, and that this situation is detrimental to the flourishing of the city. This article aims to critically analyse Ibn Rushd\u2019s statements on the position of women, as well as their reception in scholarly literature. ","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.24848\/islmlg.11.1.02","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5808,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Islamology","volume":"11","issue":"1","pages":"9-23"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | The Reasons for and the Consequences of Averroes’ Saying Essence to God Abstract |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Turkish Academic Research Review - Türk Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi [TARR] |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Categories | Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Fevzi Yiğit |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article deals with the relative reasons and consequences of Averroes’ saying God the essence. Thus, based on the example of Averroes, it is desired to show that the philosophers’ conception of God is actually directly related to the subject of metaphysics. The distinctions between potential and actual, being-essence and matter-form, which are thought to have strong forms of explanation, will be applied when needed. According to Averroes, his research of being is basically an investigation of essence. Although the concept of being/existence does not represent a higher level of being above the substance, it takes place in metaphysics as a higher concept with different meanings. However, according to Ibn Avicenna, the existing meets a higher level of being than the substance, and therefore its inquiry cannot be only the one for substance. Therefore, according to him, the subject of metaphysics is not a substance qua substance. In short, the possible reasons for Averroes to call God essence are as follows: First, God is the most suitable for the definition of essence in all existence. The second is that, keeping other meanings of being in mind, he accepted the concept of “mawjūd” as a mental concept that has no reality in the external world, that is, as a genus, and therefore only recognized the substance as reality. The third is the idea that the celestial bodies move endlessly. The fourth is his view on the relationship between universals and discrete entities and tangible individual essences. Following Aristotle, Averroes thinks that universals and ideas do not contribute to the existence of individual essences. The possible consequences of Averroes’ calling God a substance are as follows: The first is his Hanbalī attitude towards God in his books Fasl al-maqāl and al-Kashf an manāhij al-adilla, which he wrote on the relationship between religion and philosophy. Secondly, what was mentioned above as a cause, is a cyclical thing that can be expressed as a result here. In other words, while accepting the celestial bodies and the universe as eternal, causes God to be called essence, calling God essence results in the idea that the universe exists only apart and disconnected from him under the influence of God. The third is his rejection of the doctrines of creation out of nothing and sudūr (emanation). The refusal to create out of nothing is based on a general ontological principle -as the ancient philosophers openly expressed- “absolute absence cannot be the source of existence”. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5809","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5809,"authors_free":[{"id":6730,"entry_id":5809,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fevzi Yi\u011fit","free_first_name":"Fevzi ","free_last_name":"Yi\u011fit","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":" The Reasons for and the Consequences of Averroes\u2019 Saying Essence to God Abstract","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" The Reasons for and the Consequences of Averroes\u2019 Saying Essence to God Abstract"},"abstract":"This article deals with the relative reasons and consequences of Averroes\u2019 saying God the essence. Thus, based on the example of Averroes, it is desired to show that the philosophers\u2019 conception of God is actually directly related to the subject of metaphysics. The distinctions between potential and actual, being-essence and matter-form, which are thought to have strong forms of explanation, will be applied when needed. According to Averroes, his research of being is basically an investigation of essence. Although the concept of being\/existence does not represent a higher level of being above the substance, it takes place in metaphysics as a higher concept with different meanings. However, according to Ibn Avicenna, the existing meets a higher level of being than the substance, and therefore its inquiry cannot be only the one for substance. Therefore, according to him, the subject of metaphysics is not a substance qua substance. In short, the possible reasons for Averroes to call God essence are as follows: First, God is the most suitable for the definition of essence in all existence. The second is that, keeping other meanings of being in mind, he accepted the concept of \u201cmawj\u016bd\u201d as a mental concept that has no reality in the external world, that is, as a genus, and therefore only recognized the substance as reality. The third is the idea that the celestial bodies move endlessly. The fourth is his view on the relationship between universals and discrete entities and tangible individual essences. Following Aristotle, Averroes thinks that universals and ideas do not contribute to the existence of individual essences. The possible consequences of Averroes\u2019 calling God a substance are as follows: The first is his Hanbal\u012b attitude towards God in his books Fasl al-maq\u0101l and al-Kashf an man\u0101hij al-adilla, which he wrote on the relationship between religion and philosophy. Secondly, what was mentioned above as a cause, is a cyclical thing that can be expressed as a result here. In other words, while accepting the celestial bodies and the universe as eternal, causes God to be called essence, calling God essence results in the idea that the universe exists only apart and disconnected from him under the influence of God. The third is his rejection of the doctrines of creation out of nothing and sud\u016br (emanation). The refusal to create out of nothing is based on a general ontological principle -as the ancient philosophers openly expressed- \u201cabsolute absence cannot be the source of existence\u201d.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"10.30622\/tarr.982738","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5809,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" Turkish Academic Research Review - T\u00fcrk Akademik Ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar Dergisi [TARR]","volume":"6","issue":"3","pages":""}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | A Theory of Judgment in Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Arab Studies Quarterly |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | No. 3 (Summer 2021) |
| Pages | 268–281 |
| Categories | Linguistics, Politics, Rhetoric, Law, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Rayyan Dabbous |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5404","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5404,"authors_free":[{"id":6265,"entry_id":5404,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rayyan Dabbous","free_first_name":"Rayyan","free_last_name":"Dabbous","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Theory of Judgment in Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Theory of Judgment in Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.13169\/arabstudquar.43.3.0268","doi_url":"10.2307\/j50005550 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5404,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arab Studies Quarterly","volume":"43","issue":"No. 3 (Summer 2021)","pages":"268\u2013281"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Algunos aspectos de la doctrina tomista del entendimiento posible |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 1985 |
| Journal | Sapientia |
| Volume | 40 |
| Pages | 109–120 |
| Categories | Psychology, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Maria L. de Stier |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"818","_score":null,"_source":{"id":818,"authors_free":[{"id":982,"entry_id":818,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":969,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Maria L. de Stier","free_first_name":"Maria L.","free_last_name":"de Stier","norm_person":{"id":969,"first_name":"Maria L.","last_name":"de Stier","full_name":"Maria L. de Stier","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/155872087","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/246534670","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Maria L. de Stier"}}],"entry_title":"Algunos aspectos de la doctrina tomista del entendimiento posible","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Algunos aspectos de la doctrina tomista del entendimiento posible"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1985","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":969,"full_name":"Maria L. de Stier","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":818,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Sapientia","volume":"40","issue":null,"pages":"109\u2013120"}},"sort":["Algunos aspectos de la doctrina tomista del entendimiento posible"]}
| Title | Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Al-Masāq |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 253–264 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Instead of dismissing traditional mythology and poetry as heresies, Greek philosophy introduced a methodology of understanding known as allegory. Philo of Alexandria (20 BC-50 AD) was one of the first to employ allegory for understanding religious scriptures whose writings survived in the Christian traditions. In the Arab world, the philosopher Ibn Rushd (520-595/1126-1198) initiated the same method of commentary with his demonstration of the essential harmony between philosophy properly understood and scripture properly interpreted. This essay posits that Greek philosophy laid down a common tool for understanding the scriptures that exist in the Christian and Muslim traditions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1762","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1762,"authors_free":[{"id":2033,"entry_id":1762,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1496,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","free_first_name":"Shuhaimi M.","free_last_name":"Bin Haji Ishak","norm_person":{"id":1496,"first_name":"Shuhaimi M.","last_name":"Bin Haji Ishak","full_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1038449014","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/305147204","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak"}}],"entry_title":"Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"Instead of dismissing traditional mythology and poetry as heresies, Greek philosophy introduced a methodology of understanding known as allegory. Philo of Alexandria (20 BC-50 AD) was one of the first to employ allegory for understanding religious scriptures whose writings survived in the Christian traditions. In the Arab world, the philosopher Ibn Rushd (520-595\/1126-1198) initiated the same method of commentary with his demonstration of the essential harmony between philosophy properly understood and scripture properly interpreted. This essay posits that Greek philosophy laid down a common tool for understanding the scriptures that exist in the Christian and Muslim traditions.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09503110.2012.727656","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1496,"full_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1762,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Mas\u0101q","volume":"24","issue":"3","pages":"253\u2013264"}},"sort":["Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd"]}
| Title | Alternatives to Alternatives: Approaches to Aristotle's Arguments per impossibile |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2002 |
| Journal | Vivarium |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 137-173 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Taneli Kukkonen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/41963679 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5750","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5750,"authors_free":[{"id":6659,"entry_id":5750,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":828,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","free_first_name":"Taneli ","free_last_name":"Kukkonen","norm_person":{"id":828,"first_name":"Taneli","last_name":"Kukkonen","full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1064756859","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/242146822498007382889","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Taneli Kukkonen"}}],"entry_title":"Alternatives to Alternatives: Approaches to Aristotle's Arguments per impossibile","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Alternatives to Alternatives: Approaches to Aristotle's Arguments per impossibile"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/41963679","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":828,"full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5750,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vivarium","volume":"40","issue":"2","pages":"137-173"}},"sort":["Alternatives to Alternatives: Approaches to Aristotle's Arguments per impossibile"]}
| Title | An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Acta Philosophica |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 405-420 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Francisco Romero Carasquillo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper offers an account of Averroes’ early doctrine of the internal senses with special reference to the role that intentionality plays in internal sense cognition. The author points out that, whereas for Avicenna an “intention” is the object of a specific faculty, for Averroes it is the formal aspect at any level of internal-sense cognition. This interpretation is required by the need to find coherence among those passages in Averroes’ Epitome de Parva naturalia that ascribe the joining of images and intentions to both the cogitative and memorative faculties. Consequently, Averroes’ account is hopelessly incoherent unless one interprets him as departing from, and indeed revising, the Avicennian doctrine of intentionality along more a faithful Aristotelian-abstractionist framework. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2043","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2043,"authors_free":[{"id":2485,"entry_id":2043,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1620,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","free_first_name":"Francisco","free_last_name":"Romero Carasquillo","norm_person":{"id":1620,"first_name":"Francisco","last_name":"Romero Carasquillo","full_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","short_ident":"FraCar","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francisco Romero Carasquillo"}}],"entry_title":"An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes"},"abstract":"This paper offers an account of Averroes\u2019 early doctrine of the internal senses with special reference to the role that intentionality plays in internal sense cognition. The author points out that, whereas for Avicenna an \u201cintention\u201d is the object of a specific faculty, for Averroes it is the formal aspect at any level of internal-sense cognition. This interpretation is required by the need to find coherence among those passages in Averroes\u2019 Epitome de Parva naturalia that ascribe the joining of images and intentions to both the cogitative and memorative faculties. Consequently, Averroes\u2019 account is hopelessly incoherent unless one interprets him as departing from, and indeed revising, the Avicennian doctrine of intentionality along more a faithful Aristotelian-abstractionist framework.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1620,"full_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2043,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Acta Philosophica","volume":"20","issue":"2","pages":"405-420"}},"sort":["An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes"]}
| Title | An Averroist Solution to a Maimonidean Perplexity |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2000 |
| Journal | Maimonidean Studies |
| Volume | 4 |
| Pages | 15–30 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Maimonides |
| Author(s) | Seymour W. Feldman |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"856","_score":null,"_source":{"id":856,"authors_free":[{"id":1020,"entry_id":856,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":988,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Seymour W. Feldman","free_first_name":"Seymour W.","free_last_name":"Feldman","norm_person":{"id":988,"first_name":"Seymour W.","last_name":"Feldman","full_name":"Seymour W. Feldman","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1044448946","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51815768","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Seymour W. Feldman"}}],"entry_title":"An Averroist Solution to a Maimonidean Perplexity","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"An Averroist Solution to a Maimonidean Perplexity"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2000","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"}],"authors":[{"id":988,"full_name":"Seymour W. Feldman","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":856,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Maimonidean Studies","volume":"4","issue":null,"pages":"15\u201330"}},"sort":["An Averroist Solution to a Maimonidean Perplexity"]}
| Title | An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth/Twelfth Century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 117–127 |
| Categories | Review |
| Author(s) | Jules Louis Janssens |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This volume concludes a series of three books devoted to Arabic philosophy. The first volume, published in 2007, addressed the sources and the reception of classical Arabic philosophy, and the second volume considered Arabic philosophy in the fourth/tenth century. It is immediately striking that the eleventh century, which, in line with the project, undoubtedly had to be qualified as the age of Ibn Sīnā, has been skipped. At first sight, there seems to be little philosophy during this time besides Ibn Sīnā himself and his so-called immediate disciples. Among the latter, however, one detects important differences in the way they address their master's legacy. Moreover, the eleventh century is the period in which Ibn Sīnā's philosophy entered Ashʿarite theology, perhaps already in al-Juwaynī's thought and certainly in al-Ghazālī's. Much of what comes to the fore in the present volume results from or has some basis in these facts. Let me add that in Muslim Andalusia during this century, one finds such a major thinker as Ibn Ḥazm, who, although above all a theologian, considered philosophical ideas and, inter alia, refers to al-Kindī. Hence, it is regrettable that no attention has been paid to this period. This said, the project as such has offered many new perspectives regarding classical Arabic philosophy, and the present volume is no exception. In particular, this volume shows the vivacity of philosophy, especially in Ibn Sīnā's view, in the twelfth century. As Peter Adamson, the editor, states in the introduction, the twelfth century may be characterized as a second formative period. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1634","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1634,"authors_free":[{"id":1889,"entry_id":1634,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":655,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jules Louis Janssens","free_first_name":"Jules Louis","free_last_name":"Janssens","norm_person":{"id":655,"first_name":"Jules","last_name":"Janssens","full_name":"Jules Janssens","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139312471","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/81614","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd139312471.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jules Janssens"}}],"entry_title":"An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century"},"abstract":"This volume concludes a series of three books devoted to Arabic philosophy. The first volume, published in 2007, addressed the sources and the reception of classical Arabic philosophy, and the second volume considered Arabic philosophy in the fourth\/tenth century. It is immediately striking that the eleventh century, which, in line with the project, undoubtedly had to be qualified as the age of Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, has been skipped. At first sight, there seems to be little philosophy during this time besides Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 himself and his so-called immediate disciples. Among the latter, however, one detects important differences in the way they address their master's legacy. Moreover, the eleventh century is the period in which Ibn S\u012bn\u0101's philosophy entered Ash\u02bfarite theology, perhaps already in al-Juwayn\u012b's thought and certainly in al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's. Much of what comes to the fore in the present volume results from or has some basis in these facts. Let me add that in Muslim Andalusia during this century, one finds such a major thinker as Ibn \u1e24azm, who, although above all a theologian, considered philosophical ideas and, inter alia, refers to al-Kind\u012b. Hence, it is regrettable that no attention has been paid to this period. This said, the project as such has offered many new perspectives regarding classical Arabic philosophy, and the present volume is no exception. In particular, this volume shows the vivacity of philosophy, especially in Ibn S\u012bn\u0101's view, in the twelfth century. As Peter Adamson, the editor, states in the introduction, the twelfth century may be characterized as a second formative period.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"}],"authors":[{"id":655,"full_name":"Jules Janssens","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1634,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"1","pages":"117\u2013127"}},"sort":["An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century"]}
| Title | An Unknown Treatise of Averroes against the Avicennians on the First Cause |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1997 |
| Journal | Recherches de théologie et de philosophie médiévales |
| Volume | 64 |
| Pages | 86–135 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Guy Guldentops , Carlos Steel , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | Guy Guldentops Carlos Steel |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1860","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1860,"authors_free":[{"id":2203,"entry_id":1860,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":2204,"entry_id":1860,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":641,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Guy Guldentops","free_first_name":"Guy","free_last_name":"Guldentops","norm_person":{"id":641,"first_name":"Guy","last_name":"Guldentops","full_name":"Guy Guldentops","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1031934898","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44458688","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1031934898.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Guy Guldentops"}},{"id":2205,"entry_id":1860,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":693,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Carlos Steel","free_first_name":"Carlos","free_last_name":"Steel","norm_person":{"id":693,"first_name":"Carlos","last_name":"Steel","full_name":"Carlos Steel","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/122963083","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19697009","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd122963083.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Carlos Steel"}},{"id":2206,"entry_id":1860,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":641,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Guy Guldentops","free_first_name":"Guy","free_last_name":"Guldentops","norm_person":{"id":641,"first_name":"Guy","last_name":"Guldentops","full_name":"Guy Guldentops","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1031934898","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/44458688","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1031934898.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Guy Guldentops"}},{"id":2207,"entry_id":1860,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":693,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Carlos Steel","free_first_name":"Carlos","free_last_name":"Steel","norm_person":{"id":693,"first_name":"Carlos","last_name":"Steel","full_name":"Carlos Steel","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/122963083","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19697009","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd122963083.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Carlos Steel"}}],"entry_title":"An Unknown Treatise of Averroes against the Avicennians on the First Cause","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"An Unknown Treatise of Averroes against the Avicennians on the First Cause"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1997","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":641,"full_name":"Guy Guldentops","role":2},{"id":693,"full_name":"Carlos Steel","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1860,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de th\u00e9ologie et de philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"64","issue":null,"pages":"86\u2013135"}},"sort":["An Unknown Treatise of Averroes against the Avicennians on the First Cause"]}
| Title | An unpublished late thirteenth-century commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1959 |
| Journal | Traditio |
| Volume | 15 |
| Pages | 299-326 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Nicomachean ethics, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Kimon Giocarinis |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/27830388 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5665","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5665,"authors_free":[{"id":6570,"entry_id":5665,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kimon Giocarinis","free_first_name":"Kimon ","free_last_name":"Giocarinis","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"An unpublished late thirteenth-century commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"An unpublished late thirteenth-century commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1959","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27830388","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5665,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Traditio","volume":"15","issue":"","pages":" 299-326"}},"sort":["An unpublished late thirteenth-century commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle"]}
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5460","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5460,"authors_free":[{"id":6324,"entry_id":5460,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tomoaki Shinoda","free_first_name":"Tomoaki","free_last_name":"Shinoda","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Animosity against those \"drowned in debt\" : an analysis of legal texts in the Mar\u012bnid period","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Animosity against those \"drowned in debt\" : an analysis of legal texts in the Mar\u012bnid period"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5460,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hesp\u00e9ris-Tamuda","volume":"57","issue":"1","pages":"301-323"}},"sort":["Animosity against those \"drowned in debt\" : an analysis of legal texts in the Mar\u012bnid period"]}
| Title | Antike Lehren vom Wahrnehmen bei Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1986 |
| Journal | Sudhoffs Archiv |
| Volume | 70 |
| Pages | 129–142 |
| Categories | Psychology |
| Author(s) | Helmut Gätje |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/20777078 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"773","_score":null,"_source":{"id":773,"authors_free":[{"id":935,"entry_id":773,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":240,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","free_first_name":"Helmut","free_last_name":"G\u00e4tje","norm_person":{"id":240,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1021419966","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29561534","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Helmut G\u00e4tje"}}],"entry_title":"Antike Lehren vom Wahrnehmen bei Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Antike Lehren vom Wahrnehmen bei Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1986","language":"German","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/20777078","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":240,"full_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":773,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Sudhoffs Archiv","volume":"70","issue":null,"pages":"129\u2013142"}},"sort":["Antike Lehren vom Wahrnehmen bei Averroes"]}