| Title | Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Études Juives |
| Volume | 181 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 185–222 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Gersonides, Commentary, Method |
| Author(s) | Esti Eisenmann |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes’s Epitome of Aristotle’s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides’ exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides’ methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle’s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5386,"authors_free":[{"id":6238,"entry_id":5386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Esti Eisenmann","free_first_name":"Esti","free_last_name":"Eisenmann","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics"},"abstract":"The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes\u2019s Epitome of Aristotle\u2019s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides\u2019 exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides\u2019 methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle\u2019s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.2143\/REJ.181.1.3290628","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des \u00c9tudes Juives","volume":"181","issue":"1-2","pages":"185\u2013222"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Sul «materialismo» di Averroè. Un bilancio da Renan a oggi |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Intersezioni |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 231-247 |
| Categories | Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Modern Readings |
| Author(s) | Antonio Lombardi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The historiographical rediscovery of Averroes’ thought in the 19th century coincided with its reading in a materialistic sense. From Renan to Bloch, via Lange and Gentile, this interpretation has been widespread, making the Arab thinker a precursor of modern rationalism and immanentism. Although in the 20th century more philologically accurate research has challenged this long-standing image of Averroes, it continues to persist in current debates, at the risk of some misrepresentation. This article attempts a critical assessment of such interpretations in light of the more recent tendency to focus on «historical» Averroes, assuming that this may contribute to the debate on the meaning of Averroism in the history of Western ideas. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5541","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5541,"authors_free":[{"id":6434,"entry_id":5541,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Antonio Lombardi","free_first_name":"Antonio ","free_last_name":"Lombardi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Sul \u00abmaterialismo\u00bb di Averro\u00e8. Un bilancio da Renan a oggi","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Sul \u00abmaterialismo\u00bb di Averro\u00e8. Un bilancio da Renan a oggi"},"abstract":"The historiographical rediscovery of Averroes\u2019 thought in the 19th century coincided with its reading in a materialistic sense. From Renan to Bloch, via Lange and \r\nGentile, this interpretation has been widespread, making the Arab thinker a precursor of modern rationalism and immanentism. Although in the 20th century more \r\nphilologically accurate research has challenged this long-standing image of Averroes, \r\nit continues to persist in current debates, at the risk of some misrepresentation. This \r\narticle attempts a critical assessment of such interpretations in light of the more \r\nrecent tendency to focus on \u00abhistorical\u00bb Averroes, assuming that this may contribute \r\nto the debate on the meaning of Averroism in the history of Western ideas.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5541,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Intersezioni ","volume":"42","issue":"2","pages":"231-247"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Substances in Subjects: Instantiation and Existence in Avicenna |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Journal of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 453-471 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Tradition and Reception, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Nathaniel B. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In an effort to refute Avicenna’s real distinction between essence and existence, Averroes argues for an Instantiation Analysis of existence which thinks of existence not as an accidental addition to an essence, but rather as the recognition that there is an instance in extramental reality which matches a concept in the mind of a knower. In this study, I argue that Averroes’s Instantiation Analysis fails to refute Avicenna’s real distinction by showing that Avicenna himself endorses the Instantiation Analysis and, in fact, makes use of it to motivate his real distinction. To show this, I review several texts where Avicenna makes the puzzling claim that substances are found to be in subjects. These texts reveal how Avicenna discovers the real distinction with Aristotle’s help—not, as Averroes relates, against the view of Aristotle. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5588","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5588,"authors_free":[{"id":6485,"entry_id":5588,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Nathaniel B. Taylor","free_first_name":"Nathaniel B.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Substances in Subjects: Instantiation and Existence in Avicenna","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Substances in Subjects: Instantiation and Existence in Avicenna"},"abstract":"In an effort to refute Avicenna\u2019s real distinction between essence and existence, Averroes argues for an Instantiation Analysis of existence which thinks of existence not as an accidental addition to an essence, but rather as the recognition that there is an instance in extramental reality which matches a concept in the mind of a knower. In this study, I argue that Averroes\u2019s Instantiation Analysis fails to refute Avicenna\u2019s real distinction by showing that Avicenna himself endorses the Instantiation Analysis and, in fact, makes use of it to motivate his real distinction. To show this, I review several texts where Avicenna makes the puzzling claim that substances are found to be in subjects. These texts reveal how Avicenna discovers the real distinction with Aristotle\u2019s help\u2014not, as Averroes relates, against the view of Aristotle.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/acpq2022519255","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5588,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Journal of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"96","issue":"3","pages":"453-471"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd in the Hanbali tradition: Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Quyyim al-Jawziyya and the continuity of philosophy in Muslim contexts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 561-581 |
| Categories | Law, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article was presented at the conference “Philosophical Perspectives on Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity and Islam” held at Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City, April 5 and 6, 2018, organized by Luis Xavier López-Farjeat. I would like to thank him warmly for his generous invitation, Louise Agasse for her corrections of my English text, and Richard Taylor for his comments and suggestions. Finally, I thank Yahya Michot for agreeing to publish this text in The Muslim world. Unless otherweise noted, all translations from Arabic are my own. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5462","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5462,"authors_free":[{"id":6326,"entry_id":5462,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd in the Hanbali tradition: Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Quyyim al-Jawziyya and the continuity of philosophy in Muslim contexts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd in the Hanbali tradition: Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Quyyim al-Jawziyya and the continuity of philosophy in Muslim contexts"},"abstract":"This article was presented at the conference \u201cPhilosophical Perspectives on Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity and Islam\u201d held at Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City, April 5 and 6, 2018, organized by Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat. I would like to thank him warmly for his generous invitation, Louise Agasse for her corrections of my English text, and Richard Taylor for his comments and suggestions. Finally, I thank Yahya Michot for agreeing to publish this text in The Muslim world. Unless otherweise noted, all translations from Arabic are my own.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12310","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5462,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"561-581"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | La recepción de la ética aristotélica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval |
| Translation | The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Endoxa |
| Volume | 48 |
| Pages | 15-46 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Nicomachean ethics, Tradition and Reception, Plato, Albert, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Andrés Martínez Lorca |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El pensamiento ético de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico filósofo islámico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristotélica sobre el tema, la Ética nicomáquea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo análisis de ese Comentario a través de los conceptos de eudaimonía o felicidad, philía o amistad y tò díkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y políticos apuntados por Aristóteles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso ético. Asimismo, señala la preocupación de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexión entre ética y política. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemonía la política.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiografía medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalusí como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepción de la Ética nicomáquea de Aristóteles, obra que penetró en los círculos filosóficos y también en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales teólogos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tomás de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al latín por un obispo, ayudó a su difusión en el mundo medieval y más tarde en el Renacimiento. The ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimonía or happiness, philía or friendship and tò díkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5565","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5565,"authors_free":[{"id":6459,"entry_id":5565,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez ","free_last_name":"Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world","main_title":{"title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval"},"abstract":"El pensamiento \u00e9tico de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico fil\u00f3sofo isl\u00e1mico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristot\u00e9lica sobre el tema, la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo an\u00e1lisis de ese Comentario a trav\u00e9s de los conceptos de eudaimon\u00eda o felicidad, phil\u00eda o amistad y t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y pol\u00edticos apuntados por Arist\u00f3teles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso \u00e9tico. Asimismo, se\u00f1ala la preocupaci\u00f3n de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexi\u00f3n entre \u00e9tica y pol\u00edtica. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemon\u00eda la pol\u00edtica.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiograf\u00eda medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalus\u00ed como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepci\u00f3n de la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea de Arist\u00f3teles, obra que penetr\u00f3 en los c\u00edrculos filos\u00f3ficos y tambi\u00e9n en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales te\u00f3logos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al lat\u00edn por un obispo, ayud\u00f3 a su difusi\u00f3n en el mundo medieval y m\u00e1s tarde en el Renacimiento.\r\n\r\nThe ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimon\u00eda or happiness, phil\u00eda or friendship and t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5944\/endoxa.48.2021 (refers to the whole volume)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":756,"full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5565,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Endoxa","volume":"48","issue":"","pages":"15-46"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Porphyry’s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Studia graeco-arabica |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107–124 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Charles Manekin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry’s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes’ paraphrase or “Middle Commentary”, since Porphyry’s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes’ paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5010,"authors_free":[{"id":5747,"entry_id":5010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":679,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles Manekin","free_first_name":"Charles","free_last_name":"Manekin","norm_person":{"id":679,"first_name":"Charles H.","last_name":"Manekin","full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133803554","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/112521012","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles H. Manekin"}}],"entry_title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"},"abstract":"Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry\u2019s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes\u2019 paraphrase or \u201cMiddle Commentary\u201d, since Porphyry\u2019s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes\u2019 paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12871\/978883339614917","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":679,"full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"107\u2013124"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Sources et origines de la théorie de l’intellect d’Averroès (II) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 135–232 |
| Categories | Psychology, Tradition and Reception, Influence, De anima |
| Author(s) | Marc Geoffroy |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Cette contribution constitue la deuxième partie de la publication, avec quelques mises à jour et aménagements, d’une thèse de doctorat soutenue sous le même intitulé à l’École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris, en décembre 2009 et dont la première partie a été publiée dans les MUSJ 66 (2015-2016). L’auteur entend, selon une perspective strictement historique, déterminer les sources sur lesquelles s’est appuyé, entre les années cinquante et soixante du xiie siècle (première période de son travail philosophique), Averroès (Ibn Rušd, m. 1198) pour concevoir sa théorie de l’âme et de l’intellect, en référence aux sources péripatéticiennes auxquelles il pouvait avoir accès de son temps. Pour celui qui vaut dans la tradition philosophique comme le « Commentateur » d’Aristote par excellence, il peut paraître étonnant qu’Averroès n’ait eu d’emblée accès qu’à des sources indirectes relatives à la théorie de l’âme du Stagirite, mais ce fut pourtant le cas, comme l’auteur le montre ici. On voit en effet que la doctrine de l’âme exposée par Averroès est essentiellement structurée par l’enseignement d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise et par son De anima. L’aristotélisme d’Averroès apparaît de ce point de vue comme un aristotélisme sans Aristote, et ceci allait refluer de manière décisive sur l’exégèse d’Averroès une fois qu’il se serait emparé de l’écrit du Stagirite, notamment et surtout pour expliquer les chapitres 4 et 5 du livre III du De anima (sur l’intellect en puissance et l’intellect agent). |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/546 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5045","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5045,"authors_free":[{"id":5794,"entry_id":5045,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":955,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Marc Geoffroy","free_first_name":"Marc","free_last_name":"Geoffroy","norm_person":{"id":955,"first_name":"Marc","last_name":"Geoffroy","full_name":"Marc Geoffroy","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/174155514","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7482512","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Marc Geoffroy"}}],"entry_title":"Sources et origines de la th\u00e9orie de l\u2019intellect d\u2019Averro\u00e8s (II)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Sources et origines de la th\u00e9orie de l\u2019intellect d\u2019Averro\u00e8s (II)"},"abstract":"Cette contribution constitue la deuxi\u00e8me partie de la publication, avec quelques mises \u00e0 jour et am\u00e9nagements, d\u2019une th\u00e8se de doctorat soutenue sous le m\u00eame intitul\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019\u00c9cole Pratique des Hautes \u00c9tudes, Paris, en d\u00e9cembre 2009 et dont la premi\u00e8re partie a \u00e9t\u00e9 publi\u00e9e dans les MUSJ 66 (2015-2016). L\u2019auteur entend, selon une perspective strictement historique, d\u00e9terminer les sources sur lesquelles s\u2019est appuy\u00e9, entre les ann\u00e9es cinquante et soixante du xiie si\u00e8cle (premi\u00e8re p\u00e9riode de son travail philosophique), Averro\u00e8s (Ibn Ru\u0161d, m. 1198) pour concevoir sa th\u00e9orie de l\u2019\u00e2me et de l\u2019intellect, en r\u00e9f\u00e9rence aux sources p\u00e9ripat\u00e9ticiennes auxquelles il pouvait avoir acc\u00e8s de son temps. Pour celui qui vaut dans la tradition philosophique comme le \u00ab Commentateur \u00bb d\u2019Aristote par excellence, il peut para\u00eetre \u00e9tonnant qu\u2019Averro\u00e8s n\u2019ait eu d\u2019embl\u00e9e acc\u00e8s qu\u2019\u00e0 des sources indirectes relatives \u00e0 la th\u00e9orie de l\u2019\u00e2me du Stagirite, mais ce fut pourtant le cas, comme l\u2019auteur le montre ici. On voit en effet que la doctrine de l\u2019\u00e2me expos\u00e9e par Averro\u00e8s est essentiellement structur\u00e9e par l\u2019enseignement d\u2019Alexandre d\u2019Aphrodise et par son De anima. L\u2019aristot\u00e9lisme d\u2019Averro\u00e8s appara\u00eet de ce point de vue comme un aristot\u00e9lisme sans Aristote, et ceci allait refluer de mani\u00e8re d\u00e9cisive sur l\u2019ex\u00e9g\u00e8se d\u2019Averro\u00e8s une fois qu\u2019il se serait empar\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e9crit du Stagirite, notamment et surtout pour expliquer les chapitres 4 et 5 du livre III du De anima (sur l\u2019intellect en puissance et l\u2019intellect agent).","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/546","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":955,"full_name":"Marc Geoffroy","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5045,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"135\u2013232"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Vérité et validité d’Averroès à l’aristotélisme renaissant |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 83–92 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Tradition and Reception, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Ali Benmakhlouf |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| La théorie de la « double-vérité » fut un immense contresens apposé par Thomas d’Aquin sur l’oeuvre d’Averroès dans laquelle elle ne se trouve pas. Le présent article déplace les enjeux vers la notion de validité en explorant la double stratégie qui se met en place chez Averroès : 1) montrer que la sagesse (ḥikma) dont parle le Coran est la philosophie la plus haute, celle qui fait usage de la démonstration ; 2) promouvoir la démonstration comme outil de validité du savoir. L’auteur rappelle le moment inaugural d’al-Kindī, qui met en place la démarche scientifique et s’intéresse donc à la validité et à la forme des arguments, avant de se concentrer sur Averroès et la mise en cohérence du vrai et du valide qui s’opère dans le Discours Décisif. L’article s’achève sur les prolongements de la question de la validité à la Renaissance. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/543 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5037","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5037,"authors_free":[{"id":5784,"entry_id":5037,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":774,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","free_first_name":"Ali","free_last_name":"Benmakhlouf","norm_person":{"id":774,"first_name":"Ali","last_name":"Benmakhlouf","full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120589850","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24737587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ali Benmakhlouf"}}],"entry_title":"V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et validit\u00e9 d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 l\u2019aristot\u00e9lisme renaissant","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"V\u00e9rit\u00e9 et validit\u00e9 d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 l\u2019aristot\u00e9lisme renaissant"},"abstract":"La th\u00e9orie de la \u00ab double-v\u00e9rit\u00e9 \u00bb fut un immense contresens appos\u00e9 par Thomas d\u2019Aquin sur l\u2019oeuvre d\u2019Averro\u00e8s dans laquelle elle ne se trouve pas. Le pr\u00e9sent article d\u00e9place les enjeux vers la notion de validit\u00e9 en explorant la double strat\u00e9gie qui se met en place chez Averro\u00e8s : 1) montrer que la sagesse (\u1e25ikma) dont parle le Coran est la philosophie la plus haute, celle qui fait usage de la d\u00e9monstration ; 2) promouvoir la d\u00e9monstration comme outil de validit\u00e9 du savoir. L\u2019auteur rappelle le moment inaugural d\u2019al-Kind\u012b, qui met en place la d\u00e9marche scientifique et s\u2019int\u00e9resse donc \u00e0 la validit\u00e9 et \u00e0 la forme des arguments, avant de se concentrer sur Averro\u00e8s et la mise en coh\u00e9rence du vrai et du valide qui s\u2019op\u00e8re dans le Discours D\u00e9cisif. L\u2019article s\u2019ach\u00e8ve sur les prolongements de la question de la validit\u00e9 \u00e0 la Renaissance.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/543","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":774,"full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5037,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"83\u201392"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 93–103 |
| Categories | Renaissance, Tradition and Reception, Psychology, Ethics |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Les spécialistes ont longtemps accusé Pietro Pomponazzi d’utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour échapper à la censure de l’Église au sujet de ses thèses sur la mortalité de l’âme et le fondement matériel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus témoigne non pas d’une promotion de la duperie mais plutôt d’une cohérence entre sa compréhension de l’utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compréhension de l’entendement humain, de l’âme et de la nature de la moralité. Ces thèses dépendent en partie de sa lecture d’Averroès. En particulier, il était d’avis que l’écriture n’était porteuse ni de vérité ni de fausseté au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s’écarta d’Averroès parce que son rejet de la psychologie était mêlé d’une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu’il considérait comme étant éloignée de l’intellection et incapable d’obtenir la vérité. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/544 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5054","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5054,"authors_free":[{"id":5804,"entry_id":5054,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture"},"abstract":"Les sp\u00e9cialistes ont longtemps accus\u00e9 Pietro Pomponazzi d\u2019utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour \u00e9chapper \u00e0 la censure de l\u2019\u00c9glise au sujet de ses th\u00e8ses sur la mortalit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e2me et le fondement mat\u00e9riel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus t\u00e9moigne non pas d\u2019une promotion de la duperie mais plut\u00f4t d\u2019une coh\u00e9rence entre sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019entendement humain, de l\u2019\u00e2me et de la nature de la moralit\u00e9. Ces th\u00e8ses d\u00e9pendent en partie de sa lecture d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. En particulier, il \u00e9tait d\u2019avis que l\u2019\u00e9criture n\u2019\u00e9tait porteuse ni de v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ni de fausset\u00e9 au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s\u2019\u00e9carta d\u2019Averro\u00e8s parce que son rejet de la psychologie \u00e9tait m\u00eal\u00e9 d\u2019une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu\u2019il consid\u00e9rait comme \u00e9tant \u00e9loign\u00e9e de l\u2019intellection et incapable d\u2019obtenir la v\u00e9rit\u00e9.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/544","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5054,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"93\u2013103"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | La position de Zabarella vis-à-vis d’Averroès dans son Commentaire sur le De anima |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 105–135 |
| Categories | Renaissance, Tradition and Reception, Commentary, De anima |
| Author(s) | Jules Janssens |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Dans son commentaire sur le De anima d’Aristote Zabarella fait un usage non négligeable du Grand Commentaire sur le même ouvrage d’Averroès, le grand penseur andalou. On a pris l’habitude de considérer que Zabarella n’a pas pu finaliser son commentaire, étant donné qu’il fut publié à titre posthume. Il s’agirait donc d’un ouvrage incomplet. Toutefois, si on tient compte du fait que Zabarella s’intéresse avant tout, voire presque exclusivement, à l’étude de l’âme humaine, tout indique qu’il a consciemment choisi de ne pas commenter certains chapitres de l’ouvrage du Stagirite. Quant à l’impact d’Averroès sur la doctrine de l’âme exposée par Zabarella, elle a été diversement évaluée dans la recherche contemporaine, mais dans l’ensemble on y perçoit une attitude fortement critique du dernier envers le premier. Il est nécessaire de nuancer ce jugement. En effet, sur la base de trois fragments, répartis sur les trois livres, la présente recherche met en lumière qu’Averroès est considéré par Zabarella comme une vraie autorité, « auctoritas » ; que Zabarella souscrit parfois pleinement à l’interprétation du maître arabe ; et, enfin, que Zabarella explique certaines explications « erronées » de ce dernier comme l’effet inévitable de la traduction fautive du texte aristotélicien dont Averroès disposait. En somme, l’attitude de Zabarella vis-à-vis d’Averroès s’avère complexe, évitant aussi bien l’excès d’un rejet total que celui d’une acceptation aveugle. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/545 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5051","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5051,"authors_free":[{"id":5801,"entry_id":5051,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":655,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jules Janssens","free_first_name":"Jules","free_last_name":"Janssens","norm_person":{"id":655,"first_name":"Jules","last_name":"Janssens","full_name":"Jules Janssens","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139312471","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/81614","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd139312471.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jules Janssens"}}],"entry_title":"La position de Zabarella vis-\u00e0-vis d\u2019Averro\u00e8s dans son Commentaire sur le De anima","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La position de Zabarella vis-\u00e0-vis d\u2019Averro\u00e8s dans son Commentaire sur le De anima"},"abstract":"Dans son commentaire sur le De anima d\u2019Aristote Zabarella fait un usage non n\u00e9gligeable du Grand Commentaire sur le m\u00eame ouvrage d\u2019Averro\u00e8s, le grand penseur andalou. On a pris l\u2019habitude de consid\u00e9rer que Zabarella n\u2019a pas pu finaliser son commentaire, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 qu\u2019il fut publi\u00e9 \u00e0 titre posthume. Il s\u2019agirait donc d\u2019un ouvrage incomplet. Toutefois, si on tient compte du fait que Zabarella s\u2019int\u00e9resse avant tout, voire presque exclusivement, \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tude de l\u2019\u00e2me humaine, tout indique qu\u2019il a consciemment choisi de ne pas commenter certains chapitres de l\u2019ouvrage du Stagirite. Quant \u00e0 l\u2019impact d\u2019Averro\u00e8s sur la doctrine de l\u2019\u00e2me expos\u00e9e par Zabarella, elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 diversement \u00e9valu\u00e9e dans la recherche contemporaine, mais dans l\u2019ensemble on y per\u00e7oit une attitude fortement critique du dernier envers le premier. Il est n\u00e9cessaire de nuancer ce jugement. En effet, sur la base de trois fragments, r\u00e9partis sur les trois livres, la pr\u00e9sente recherche met en lumi\u00e8re qu\u2019Averro\u00e8s est consid\u00e9r\u00e9 par Zabarella comme une vraie autorit\u00e9, \u00ab auctoritas \u00bb ; que Zabarella souscrit parfois pleinement \u00e0 l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation du ma\u00eetre arabe ; et, enfin, que Zabarella explique certaines explications \u00ab erron\u00e9es \u00bb de ce dernier comme l\u2019effet in\u00e9vitable de la traduction fautive du texte aristot\u00e9licien dont Averro\u00e8s disposait. En somme, l\u2019attitude de Zabarella vis-\u00e0-vis d\u2019Averro\u00e8s s\u2019av\u00e8re complexe, \u00e9vitant aussi bien l\u2019exc\u00e8s d\u2019un rejet total que celui d\u2019une acceptation aveugle.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/545","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":655,"full_name":"Jules Janssens","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5051,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"105\u2013135"}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle’s Physica and Averroes’ Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Oriens |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 149–167 |
| Categories | Physics, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Horst Schmieja |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Sixty-two thirteenth and fourteenth-century Latin manuscripts of Averroes’ commentary of Aristotle’s Physics are currently known. Many of these manuscripts have a substantial gap in Book 8, stretching from about the middle of commentary 76 to the end of commentary 79. The Cathedral Library of Toledo holds a thirteenth-century manuscript which not only contains Book 8 in its entirety, but also two different Arabic-Latin translations of significant parts of textus and commentum 76. Analysis of these two versions allows important insights into the translator’s work. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1697","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1697,"authors_free":[{"id":1960,"entry_id":1697,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":917,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Horst Schmieja","free_first_name":"Horst","free_last_name":"Schmieja","norm_person":{"id":917,"first_name":"Horst","last_name":"Schmieja","full_name":"Horst Schmieja","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/109279034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/71959432","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Horst Schmieja"}}],"entry_title":"Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle\u2019s Physica and Averroes\u2019 Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle\u2019s Physica and Averroes\u2019 Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo"},"abstract":"Sixty-two thirteenth and fourteenth-century Latin manuscripts of Averroes\u2019 commentary of Aristotle\u2019s Physics are currently known. Many of these manuscripts have a substantial gap in Book 8, stretching from about the middle of commentary 76 to the end of commentary 79. The Cathedral Library of Toledo holds a thirteenth-century manuscript which not only contains Book 8 in its entirety, but also two different Arabic-Latin translations of significant parts of textus and commentum 76. Analysis of these two versions allows important insights into the translator\u2019s work.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/187783712X634698","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":917,"full_name":"Horst Schmieja","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1697,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriens","volume":"40","issue":"1","pages":"149\u2013167"}},"sort":["Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle\u2019s Physica and Averroes\u2019 Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo"]}
| Title | Aristotelismus und Averroismus in der politischen Theorie bei Marsilius von Padua und Wilhelm von Ockham |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1739–1762 |
| Categories | Politics, Latin Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Ockham |
| Author(s) | Jürgen Miethke |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The paper is aiming to look at the importance of the Arabian political philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rušd) for the reception of the political philosophy of the Greek philosopher Aristotle in the Latin West by analyzing the exemple of two maior medieval authors (Marsiglio of Padua and William Ockham) for “averroistic” doctrines, in order to check the often discussed so called “Political Averroism” in the medieval Latin political philosophy. As result there seems to emerge the insight, that “Political Averroism” is only a “historiographical myth”, for Marsiglio is showing only some minor points of reference to averroistic topics, whereas Ockham seems free of clear relationship to “Averroism”. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5406","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5406,"authors_free":[{"id":6267,"entry_id":5406,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"J\u00fcrgen Miethke","free_first_name":"J\u00fcrgen","free_last_name":"Miethke","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Aristotelismus und Averroismus in der politischen Theorie bei Marsilius von Padua und Wilhelm von Ockham","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Aristotelismus und Averroismus in der politischen Theorie bei Marsilius von Padua und Wilhelm von Ockham"},"abstract":"The paper is aiming to look at the importance of the Arabian political philosopher Averroes (Ibn Ru\u0161d) for the reception of the political philosophy of the Greek philosopher Aristotle in the Latin West by analyzing the exemple of two maior medieval authors (Marsiglio of Padua and William Ockham) for \u201caverroistic\u201d doctrines, in order to check the often discussed so called \u201cPolitical Averroism\u201d in the medieval Latin political philosophy. As result there seems to emerge the insight, that \u201cPolitical Averroism\u201d is only a \u201chistoriographical myth\u201d, for Marsiglio is showing only some minor points of reference to averroistic topics, whereas Ockham seems free of clear relationship to \u201cAverroism\u201d.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"German","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26796771","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17990\/RPF\/2019_75_3_1739","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":3,"category_name":"Ockham","link":"bib?categories[]=Ockham"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5406,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"75","issue":"3","pages":"1739\u20131762"}},"sort":["Aristotelismus und Averroismus in der politischen Theorie bei Marsilius von Padua und Wilhelm von Ockham"]}
| Title | Aristotle's "Poetics" in the Fourteenth Century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1970 |
| Journal | Studies in Philology |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 278-294 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Poetics, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | William F. Boggess |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/4173682 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5694","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5694,"authors_free":[{"id":6602,"entry_id":5694,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1448,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"William F. Boggess","free_first_name":"William F. ","free_last_name":"Boggess","norm_person":{"id":1448,"first_name":"William F.","last_name":"Boggess","full_name":"William F. Boggess","short_ident":"WilBog","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=William F. Boggess"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle's \"Poetics\" in the Fourteenth Century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Aristotle's \"Poetics\" in the Fourteenth Century"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1970","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/4173682","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1448,"full_name":"William F. Boggess","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5694,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studies in Philology","volume":"67","issue":"3","pages":"278-294"}},"sort":["Aristotle's \"Poetics\" in the Fourteenth Century"]}
| Title | Audacia de Sto. Tomás en la asimilación del pensamiento heterodoxo de su época |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Date | 1974 |
| Journal | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1/3 |
| Pages | 185-204 |
| Categories | Aquinas, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Salvador Gómez Nogales |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40335275 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5705","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5705,"authors_free":[{"id":6613,"entry_id":5705,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":885,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales","free_first_name":"Salvador ","free_last_name":"G\u00f3mez Nogales","norm_person":{"id":885,"first_name":"Salvador","last_name":"G\u00f3mez Nogales","full_name":"Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1056451130","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51684134","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales"}}],"entry_title":"Audacia de Sto. Tom\u00e1s en la asimilaci\u00f3n del pensamiento heterodoxo de su \u00e9poca","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Audacia de Sto. Tom\u00e1s en la asimilaci\u00f3n del pensamiento heterodoxo de su \u00e9poca"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1974","language":"Portuguese","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/40335275","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":885,"full_name":"Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5705,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"30","issue":" 1\/3","pages":"185-204"}},"sort":["Audacia de Sto. Tom\u00e1s en la asimilaci\u00f3n del pensamiento heterodoxo de su \u00e9poca"]}
| Title | Autori Arabi e Giudei nell'opera di San Tommaso |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1960 |
| Journal | Angelicum |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3/4 |
| Pages | 336-401 |
| Categories | Aquinas, Tradition and Reception, al-Ġazālī, Avicenna, Ibn Bāǧǧa |
| Author(s) | C. Vansteenkiste |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44621289 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5669","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5669,"authors_free":[{"id":6573,"entry_id":5669,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1858,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"C. Vansteenkiste","free_first_name":"C. ","free_last_name":"Vansteenkiste","norm_person":{"id":1858,"first_name":"Clemens ","last_name":"Vansteenkiste","full_name":"Clemens Vansteenkiste","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/141544864","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Clemens Vansteenkiste"}}],"entry_title":"Autori Arabi e Giudei nell'opera di San Tommaso","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Autori Arabi e Giudei nell'opera di San Tommaso"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1960","language":"Italian","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44621289","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"}],"authors":[{"id":1858,"full_name":"Clemens Vansteenkiste","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5669,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Angelicum","volume":"37","issue":" 3\/4","pages":"336-401"}},"sort":["Autori Arabi e Giudei nell'opera di San Tommaso"]}
| Title | Autour de Pomponazzi: Problématique de l'immortalité de l'ame en Italie au début du XVIe siècle |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1961 |
| Journal | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age |
| Volume | 28 |
| Pages | 163-279 |
| Categories | Averroism, Metaphysics, Psychology, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Étienne Gilson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44403124 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5671","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5671,"authors_free":[{"id":6575,"entry_id":5671,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1873,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u00c9tienne Gilson","free_first_name":"\u00c9tienne ","free_last_name":"Gilson","norm_person":{"id":1873,"first_name":"Etienne ","last_name":"Gilson","full_name":"Etienne Gilson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118717480","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Etienne Gilson"}}],"entry_title":"Autour de Pomponazzi: Probl\u00e9matique de l'immortalit\u00e9 de l'ame en Italie au d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Autour de Pomponazzi: Probl\u00e9matique de l'immortalit\u00e9 de l'ame en Italie au d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1961","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44403124","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1873,"full_name":"Etienne Gilson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5671,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litt\u00e9raire du Moyen Age","volume":"28","issue":"","pages":"163-279"}},"sort":["Autour de Pomponazzi: Probl\u00e9matique de l'immortalit\u00e9 de l'ame en Italie au d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle"]}
| Title | Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1964 |
| Journal | Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft |
| Volume | 114 |
| Pages | 59–65 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Helmut Gätje |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43369708 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1954","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1954,"authors_free":[{"id":2390,"entry_id":1954,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":240,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","free_first_name":"Helmut","free_last_name":"G\u00e4tje","norm_person":{"id":240,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1021419966","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29561534","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Helmut G\u00e4tje"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1964","language":"German","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43369708","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":240,"full_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1954,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenl\u00e4ndischen Gesellschaft","volume":"114","issue":null,"pages":"59\u201365"}},"sort":["Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator"]}
| Title | Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Culture and dialogue |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 195-201 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5803","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5803,"authors_free":[{"id":6724,"entry_id":5803,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina ","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1163\/24683949-12340117","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5803,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Culture and dialogue","volume":"10","issue":"2","pages":"195-201"}},"sort":["Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue"]}
| Title | Averroes ex Averroe: Uncovering Ṭodros Ṭodrosi’s Method of Commenting on the Commentator |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 7-78 |
| Categories | Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Steven Harvey , Oded Horezky |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Our paper studies one of the most interesting manuscripts of medieval Jewish philosophy, a unicum that is housed in the British Library, Heb MS Add 27559. This fascinating manuscript, in part a version of a work compiled by Ṭodros Ṭodrosi, in Trinquetaille in the 1330s, is a Hebrew anthology of logical and scientific texts, written by Greek and Arabic philosophers, some of which are translated into Hebrew for the first time by Ṭodros. The paper sheds new light on this manuscript through an examination of the section on natural science that Ṭodros devoted to the study and explanation of Aristotle’s Physics and which comprises more than a third of the entire manuscript. We uncover Ṭodros’s aims and methodology in this section on physics (and, to some extent, in other sections as well), and sketch a clear picture of the ways in which Ṭodros intended to assist his contemporary readers in the study of natural science. The paper contributes to our knowledge of the fundamental status of Averroes’s middle commentaries on the Corpus Aristotelicum among medieval Jewish scholars, as well as to our growing awareness and appreciation of the achievements of a remarkable, young, fourteenth-century Provençal scholar, Ṭodros Ṭodrosi. It concludes with three appendices, two of which compare Ṭodros’s text with parallel passages in the Hebrew translations of Averroes’s commentaries, and a third which provides a detailed description of the British Library manuscript. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5576","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5576,"authors_free":[{"id":6470,"entry_id":5576,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":642,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steven Harvey","free_first_name":"Steven ","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":642,"first_name":"Steven","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Steven Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051482674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97890242","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Steven Harvey"}},{"id":6471,"entry_id":5576,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Oded Horezky","free_first_name":"Oded ","free_last_name":"Horezky","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averroes ex Averroe: Uncovering \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi\u2019s Method of Commenting on the Commentator","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes ex Averroe: Uncovering \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi\u2019s Method of Commenting on the Commentator"},"abstract":"Our paper studies one of the most interesting manuscripts of medieval Jewish philosophy, a unicum that is housed in the British Library, Heb MS Add 27559. This fascinating \r\nmanuscript, in part a version of a work compiled by \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi, in Trinquetaille in the 1330s, is a Hebrew anthology of logical and scientific texts, written by Greek and Arabic \r\nphilosophers, some of which are translated into Hebrew for the first time by \u1e6codros. The paper sheds new light on this manuscript through an examination of the section on natural science that \u1e6codros devoted to the study and explanation of Aristotle\u2019s Physics and which comprises more than a third of the entire manuscript. We uncover \u1e6codros\u2019s aims and methodology in this section on physics (and, to some extent, in other sections as well), and sketch a clear picture of the ways in which \u1e6codros intended to assist his contemporary readers in the study of natural science. The paper contributes to our knowledge of the fundamental status of Averroes\u2019s middle commentaries on the Corpus Aristotelicum\r\namong medieval Jewish scholars, as well as to our growing awareness and appreciation of the achievements of a remarkable, young, fourteenth-century Proven\u00e7al scholar, \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi. It concludes with three appendices, two of which compare \u1e6codros\u2019s \r\ntext with parallel passages in the Hebrew translations of Averroes\u2019s commentaries, and a third which provides a detailed description of the British Library manuscript.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":642,"full_name":"Steven Harvey","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5576,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism","volume":"21","issue":"1","pages":"7-78"}},"sort":["Averroes ex Averroe: Uncovering \u1e6codros \u1e6codrosi\u2019s Method of Commenting on the Commentator"]}
| Title | Averroes latinus / Averroes arabus |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Studia Leibnitiana |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 220–232 |
| Categories | Averroism, Latin Averroism, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Franz Schupp |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5162","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5162,"authors_free":[{"id":5945,"entry_id":5162,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1466,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Franz Schupp","free_first_name":"Franz","free_last_name":"Schupp","norm_person":{"id":1466,"first_name":"Franz","last_name":"Schupp","full_name":"Franz Schupp","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/124630774","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/64020587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Franz Schupp"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes latinus \/ Averroes arabus","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes latinus \/ Averroes arabus"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"German","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1466,"full_name":"Franz Schupp","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5162,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia Leibnitiana","volume":"47","issue":"2","pages":"220\u2013232"}},"sort":["Averroes latinus \/ Averroes arabus"]}