| Title | Philosophy and Religion in the Political Thought of Alfarabi |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Religions |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 908-917 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, al-Fārābī, Politics |
| Author(s) | Ishraq Ali |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Philosophy and religion were the two important sources of knowledge for medieval Arab Muslim polymaths. Owing to the difference between the nature of philosophy and religion, the interplay between philosophy and religion often takes the form of conflict in medieval Muslim thought as exemplified by the Al-Ghazali versus Averroes (Ibn Rusd) polemic. Unlike the Al-Ghazali versus Averroes (Ibn Rushd) polemic, the interplay between philosophy and religion in the political philosophy of Abu Nasr Alfarabi takes the form of harmonious co-existence. Although, for Alfarabi, religion is an inferior form of knowledge as compared to philosophy, the present article will show that philosophy and religion play equally significant roles in Alfarabi’s virtuous city and that in the absence of either philosophy or religion, the political system proposed by Alfarabi cannot exist. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5800","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5800,"authors_free":[{"id":6721,"entry_id":5800,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ishraq Ali","free_first_name":"Ishraq ","free_last_name":"Ali","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Philosophy and Religion in the Political Thought of Alfarabi","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy and Religion in the Political Thought of Alfarabi"},"abstract":"Philosophy and religion were the two important sources of knowledge for medieval Arab\r\nMuslim polymaths. Owing to the difference between the nature of philosophy and religion, the interplay between philosophy and religion often takes the form of conflict in medieval Muslim thought as exemplified by the Al-Ghazali versus Averroes (Ibn Rusd) polemic. Unlike the Al-Ghazali versus Averroes (Ibn Rushd) polemic, the interplay between philosophy and religion in the political philosophy of Abu Nasr Alfarabi takes the form of harmonious co-existence. Although, for Alfarabi, religion is an inferior form of knowledge as compared to philosophy, the present article will show that philosophy and religion play equally significant roles in Alfarabi\u2019s virtuous city and that in the absence of either philosophy or religion, the political system proposed by Alfarabi cannot exist.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/rel14070908","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5800,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Religions","volume":"14","issue":"7","pages":"908-917"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2020 |
| Journal | Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 312-327 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Medicine |
| Author(s) | Miquel Forcada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rushd consideró la medicina como un arte productivo en su al-Kulliyyāt fī l-ṭibb, escrito entre 1162 y 1169, y como una ciencia en su comentario al poema de Ibn Sīnā sobre la medicina (Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb), escrito en 1180. En Kulliyyāt, Ibn Rushd sigue de manera bastante estricta las ideas sobre el estatus de la medicina del filósofo al-Fārābī. En Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, Ibn Rushd sintetiza las concepciones de varias obras, entre las cuales Masā’il fī l-ṭibb de Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq y Ḥubaysh, Qānūn fī l-ṭibb de Ibn Sinā y las obras sobre la lógica aristotélica de al-Fārābī. El análisis conjunto de estas fuentes, más las aportaciones de un nuevo manuscrito de Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, proporcionan una idea más clara de la concepción de la medicina expuesta en esta obra y, en consecuencia, podemos reconsiderar y relativizar la diferencia entre esta concepción y la que se expone en Kulliyyāt. Las ideas de Ibn Rushd sobre el estatus de la medicina se analizan de acuerdo con el contexto sociopolítico en que fueron concebidas, considerando especialmente el hecho de que Sharḥ Urjūza Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb fue escrito para las elites intelectuales y políticas del régimen almohad. Ibn Rushd considered medicine as a productive art in his al-Kulliyyāt fī l-ṭibb, written between 1162 and 1169, and as a science in his commentary on Ibn Sīnā’s poem on the subject (Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb), written in 1180. In Kulliyyāt, Ibn Rushd followed quite strictly the ideas on the status of medicine propounded by the philosopher al-Fārābī. In Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, Ibn Rushd summarised the conceptions of several works including Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq’s Masā’il fīl-ṭibb, Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn fī l-ṭibb and al-Fārābī’s works on Aristotle’s logic. The joint analysis of these sources and the evidence provided by a new manuscript of Ibn Rushd’s Sharḥ give us a clearer idea of the conception of medicine extant in this latter work and, in consequence, we can reconsider and relativise the difference between it and the conception expounded in Kulliyyāt. Ibn Rushd’s ideas on the status of medicine are analysed according to the sociopolitical context in which they were conceived, taking particular account of the fact that Sharḥ Urjūza Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb was written for the intellectual and political elites of the Almohad regime. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5592","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5592,"authors_free":[{"id":6491,"entry_id":5592,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Miquel Forcada","free_first_name":"Miquel","free_last_name":"Forcada","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition"},"abstract":" Ibn Rushd consider\u00f3 la medicina como un arte productivo en su al-Kulliyy\u0101t f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb, escrito entre 1162 y 1169, y como una ciencia en su comentario al poema de Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 sobre la medicina (Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb), escrito en 1180. En Kulliyy\u0101t, Ibn Rushd sigue de manera bastante estricta las ideas sobre el estatus de la medicina del fil\u00f3sofo al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. En Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, Ibn Rushd sintetiza las concepciones de varias obras, entre las cuales Mas\u0101\u2019il f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb de \u1e24unayn ibn Is\u1e25\u0101q y \u1e24ubaysh, Q\u0101n\u016bn f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb de Ibn Sin\u0101 y las obras sobre la l\u00f3gica aristot\u00e9lica de al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. El an\u00e1lisis conjunto de estas fuentes, m\u00e1s las aportaciones de un nuevo manuscrito de Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, proporcionan una idea m\u00e1s clara de la concepci\u00f3n de la medicina expuesta en esta obra y, en consecuencia, podemos reconsiderar y relativizar la diferencia entre esta concepci\u00f3n y la que se expone en Kulliyy\u0101t. Las ideas de Ibn Rushd sobre el estatus de la medicina se analizan de acuerdo con el contexto sociopol\u00edtico en que fueron concebidas, considerando especialmente el hecho de que Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bza Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb fue escrito para las elites intelectuales y pol\u00edticas del r\u00e9gimen almohad.\r\n\r\nIbn Rushd considered medicine as a productive art in his al-Kulliyy\u0101t f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb, written between 1162 and 1169, and as a science in his commentary on Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s poem on the subject (Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb), written in 1180. In Kulliyy\u0101t, Ibn Rushd followed quite strictly the ideas on the status of medicine propounded by the philosopher al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. In Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, Ibn Rushd summarised the conceptions of several works including \u1e24unayn ibn Is\u1e25\u0101q\u2019s Mas\u0101\u2019il f\u012bl-\u1e6dibb, Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s Q\u0101n\u016bn f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb and al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s works on Aristotle\u2019s logic. The joint analysis of these sources and the evidence provided by a new manuscript of Ibn Rushd\u2019s Shar\u1e25 give us a clearer idea of the conception of medicine extant in this latter work and, in consequence, we can reconsider and relativise the difference between it and the conception expounded in Kulliyy\u0101t. Ibn Rushd\u2019s ideas on the status of \r\nmedicine are analysed according to the sociopolitical context in which they were conceived, taking particular account of the fact that Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bza Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb was written for the intellectual and political elites of the Almohad regime.","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/asclepio.2020.13","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5592,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","volume":"72","issue":"2","pages":"312-327"}},"sort":[2020]}
| Title | Citer/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rhétorique d’Aristote par Hermann l’Allemand et les citations d’al-Fârâbî et Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 28 |
| Pages | 177–218 |
| Categories | Aristotle, al-Fārābī, Tradition and Reception, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Frédérique Woerther |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5200","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5200,"authors_free":[{"id":5993,"entry_id":5200,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"Citer\/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote par Hermann l\u2019Allemand et les citations d\u2019al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee et Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Citer\/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote par Hermann l\u2019Allemand et les citations d\u2019al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee et Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5200,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"28","issue":"","pages":"177\u2013218"}},"sort":[2017]}
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5258","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5258,"authors_free":[{"id":6067,"entry_id":5258,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mustafa Yildiz","free_first_name":"Mustafa","free_last_name":"Yildiz","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Conceiving Religion: Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes on the Concepts of \u201cMillah\u201d and \u201cShar\u00eeah\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Conceiving Religion: Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes on the Concepts of \u201cMillah\u201d and \u201cShar\u00eeah\u201d"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/islamicphil2016104","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5258,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Philosophy","volume":"10","issue":"","pages":"62\u2013103"}},"sort":[2016]}
| Title | L’éternité du mouvement chez Ibn Bâjja (Avempace) : de la définition générique à la défintion numérique. Le commentaire aux chapitres 1 et 2 du livre VIII de la Physique |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Les Études Philosophiques |
| Volume | 117 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 161–216 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Physics, al-Fārābī, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Influence |
| Author(s) | Farah Cherif Zahar |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article examines Ibn Bāǧǧa’s (Avempace) interpretation of the first two chapters of the eighth book of Aristotle’s Physics and what he has in mind when he describes Aristotle’s proof as a demonstration of the eternity of motion “in genus.” His approach in the second appendix to book eight differs from the one he develops in the main commentary. In the former text, Ibn Bāǧǧa works on the distinction between essential and accidental successions, which leads him to realize that the accidental and thus possible successions— horizontal approach—are not sufficient to guarantee the eternity of movement and then to adopt a vertical approach that goes back to the numerical identity of the circular continuous motion. We show to what extent Ibn Bāǧǧa’s interpretation is indebted to Al-Fārābī’s lost treatise On Changing Beings and also aim to highlight the role of this reading in the evolution of Averroes’ interpretation. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5260","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5260,"authors_free":[{"id":6069,"entry_id":5260,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Farah Cherif Zahar","free_first_name":"Farah","free_last_name":"Cherif Zahar","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"L\u2019\u00e9ternit\u00e9 du mouvement chez Ibn B\u00e2jja (Avempace) : de la d\u00e9finition g\u00e9n\u00e9rique \u00e0 la d\u00e9fintion num\u00e9rique. Le commentaire aux chapitres 1 et 2 du livre VIII de la Physique","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"L\u2019\u00e9ternit\u00e9 du mouvement chez Ibn B\u00e2jja (Avempace) : de la d\u00e9finition g\u00e9n\u00e9rique \u00e0 la d\u00e9fintion num\u00e9rique. Le commentaire aux chapitres 1 et 2 du livre VIII de la Physique"},"abstract":"This article examines Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a\u2019s (Avempace) interpretation of the first two chapters of the eighth book of Aristotle\u2019s Physics and what he has in mind when he describes Aristotle\u2019s proof as a demonstration of the eternity of motion \u201cin genus.\u201d His approach in the second appendix to book eight differs from the one he develops in the main commentary. In the former text, Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a works on the distinction between essential and accidental successions, which leads him to realize that the accidental and thus possible successions\u2014 horizontal approach\u2014are not sufficient to guarantee the eternity of movement and then to adopt a vertical approach that goes back to the numerical identity of the circular continuous motion. We show to what extent Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a\u2019s interpretation is indebted to Al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s lost treatise On Changing Beings and also aim to highlight the role of this reading in the evolution of Averroes\u2019 interpretation. ","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5260,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Les \u00c9tudes Philosophiques","volume":"117","issue":"2","pages":"161\u2013216"}},"sort":[2016]}
| Title | A reference to al-Fârâbî’s Kitâb al-hurûf in Averroes’ critique of Avicenna (Tahâfut al-Tahâfut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Studi Magrebini |
| Volume | 12-13 |
| Pages | 433-452 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Cecilia Martini Bonadeo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Al-Fārābī’s Book of Letters (Kitāb al-ḥurūf) and the analyses devoted in this text to the terminology of “being” are authoritative references for Averroes from the epitomes of his youth to his mature treatises. Also the Farabian doctrine of the conventionality of the natural language plays a role in Averroes’ thought. This paper discusses the Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, (pp.371,5-372.12 Bouyges), where Averroes has recourse to the Book of Letters in criticizing Avicenna’s distinction between essence and existence. Averroes explicitly mentions the title of the work and recalls a passage from the fifteenth chapter. This passage had already inspired him in the Epitome on Metaphysics, where Averroes did not mention explicitly his source, but followed in al-Fārābī’s footsteps as for the analysis of the uses of “being”. Averroes uses tacitly the same passage also in his Commentary on Metaphysics Delta 7. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5196","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5196,"authors_free":[{"id":5987,"entry_id":5196,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":831,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","free_first_name":"Cecilia","free_last_name":"Martini Bonadeo","norm_person":{"id":831,"first_name":"Cecilia","last_name":"Martini Bonadeo","full_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047649543","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/305196685","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cecilia Martini Bonadeo"}}],"entry_title":"A reference to al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee\u2019s Kit\u00e2b al-hur\u00fbf in Averroes\u2019 critique of Avicenna (Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A reference to al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee\u2019s Kit\u00e2b al-hur\u00fbf in Averroes\u2019 critique of Avicenna (Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges)"},"abstract":"Al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s Book of Letters (Kit\u0101b al-\u1e25ur\u016bf) and the analyses devoted in this text to the terminology of \u201cbeing\u201d are authoritative references for Averroes from the epitomes of his youth to his mature treatises. Also the Farabian doctrine of the conventionality of the natural language plays a role in Averroes\u2019 thought. This paper discusses the Tah\u0101fut al-Tah\u0101fut, (pp.371,5-372.12 Bouyges), where Averroes has recourse to the Book of Letters in criticizing Avicenna\u2019s distinction between essence and existence. Averroes explicitly mentions the title of the work and recalls a passage from the fifteenth chapter. This passage had already inspired him in the Epitome on Metaphysics, where Averroes did not mention explicitly his source, but followed in al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s footsteps as for the analysis of the uses of \u201cbeing\u201d. Averroes uses tacitly the same passage also in his Commentary on Metaphysics Delta 7.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":831,"full_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5196,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studi Magrebini","volume":"12-13 ","issue":"","pages":"433-452"}},"sort":[2014]}
| Title | Arabic/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas’s Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A.1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | The Thomist |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 509–550 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, al-Fārābī, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Avicenna, Alexander of Aphrodisias |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5321","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5321,"authors_free":[{"id":6153,"entry_id":5321,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A.1","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A.1"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/tho.2012.0000","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5321,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Thomist","volume":"76","issue":"4","pages":"509\u2013550"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Platão, Al-Fārābī e Averróis: as qualidades essenciais ao governante |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Trans/Form/Ação. Revista de Filosofia da UNESP |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–20 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Plato, Politics |
| Author(s) | Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The political philosophy that developed in the Islamic world between the 9th and 12th centuries assumed ideas from Greek philosophy, mainly from Plato and Aristotle. Plato's Republic and Laws, and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics were the texts that laid the foundation for the political conceptions of the Arab philosophers, from the virtues to be sought after individually, to the idea of the best political regime. Based on the Greek texts translated into Arabic, these philosophers outlined the aims of political life, and the manner in which the political regime should be structured to achieve these aims. The ideal Platonic city is the paradigm to be realized. The topic of the ruler's essential qualities is part of a long tradition which remounts to the "mirrors of the princes" of Persian origin; it also appears in the Religious tradition and in the Islamic law. Two great exponents of the Arab-islamic philosophy, Al-Fârâbî and Averroes, retrieved the topic of the ruler's essential qualities of the king-philosopher uttered in the Republic, and adapted it to their historical universe. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1767","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1767,"authors_free":[{"id":2039,"entry_id":1767,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1347,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","free_first_name":"Rosalie Helena","free_last_name":"de Souza Pereira","norm_person":{"id":1347,"first_name":"Rosalie Helena","last_name":"de Souza Pereira","full_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/121640755","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira"}}],"entry_title":"Plat\u00e3o, Al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b e Averr\u00f3is: as qualidades essenciais ao governante","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Plat\u00e3o, Al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b e Averr\u00f3is: as qualidades essenciais ao governante"},"abstract":"The political philosophy that developed in the Islamic world between the 9th and 12th centuries assumed ideas from Greek philosophy, mainly from Plato and Aristotle. Plato's Republic and Laws, and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics were the texts that laid the foundation for the political conceptions of the Arab philosophers, from the virtues to be sought after individually, to the idea of the best political regime. Based on the Greek texts translated into Arabic, these philosophers outlined the aims of political life, and the manner in which the political regime should be structured to achieve these aims. The ideal Platonic city is the paradigm to be realized. The topic of the ruler's essential qualities is part of a long tradition which remounts to the \"mirrors of the princes\" of Persian origin; it also appears in the Religious tradition and in the Islamic law. Two great exponents of the Arab-islamic philosophy, Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes, retrieved the topic of the ruler's essential qualities of the king-philosopher uttered in the Republic, and adapted it to their historical universe.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"Portuguese","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/S0101-31732011000100002 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":1347,"full_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1767,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Trans\/Form\/A\u00e7\u00e3o. Revista de Filosofia da UNESP","volume":"34","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201320"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush’d |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | The Review of Metaphysics |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41–61 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, al-Ġazālī, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Michael Sweeney |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23055682 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5377","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5377,"authors_free":[{"id":6229,"entry_id":5377,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Sweeney","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Sweeney","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d"},"abstract":"The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23055682","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5377,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Review of Metaphysics","volume":"65","issue":"1","pages":"41\u201361"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Philosophy and Exegesis in al-Fārābī, Averroes, and Maimonides |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Laval théologique et philosophique, |
| Volume | 64 |
| Pages | 105–125 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Maimonides |
| Author(s) | Carlos Fraenkel |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1450","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1450,"authors_free":[{"id":1650,"entry_id":1450,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1319,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Carlos Fraenkel","free_first_name":"Carlos","free_last_name":"Fraenkel","norm_person":{"id":1319,"first_name":"Carlos","last_name":"Fraenkel","full_name":"Carlos Fraenkel","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139395938","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/15091384","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Carlos Fraenkel"}}],"entry_title":"Philosophy and Exegesis in al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, Averroes, and Maimonides","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Philosophy and Exegesis in al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, Averroes, and Maimonides"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2008","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"}],"authors":[{"id":1319,"full_name":"Carlos Fraenkel","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1450,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Laval th\u00e9ologique et philosophique,","volume":"64","issue":null,"pages":"105\u2013125"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | A reference to al-Fârâbî’s Kitâb al-hurûf in Averroes’ critique of Avicenna (Tahâfut al-Tahâfut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | Studi Magrebini |
| Volume | 12-13 |
| Pages | 433-452 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Cecilia Martini Bonadeo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Al-Fārābī’s Book of Letters (Kitāb al-ḥurūf) and the analyses devoted in this text to the terminology of “being” are authoritative references for Averroes from the epitomes of his youth to his mature treatises. Also the Farabian doctrine of the conventionality of the natural language plays a role in Averroes’ thought. This paper discusses the Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, (pp.371,5-372.12 Bouyges), where Averroes has recourse to the Book of Letters in criticizing Avicenna’s distinction between essence and existence. Averroes explicitly mentions the title of the work and recalls a passage from the fifteenth chapter. This passage had already inspired him in the Epitome on Metaphysics, where Averroes did not mention explicitly his source, but followed in al-Fārābī’s footsteps as for the analysis of the uses of “being”. Averroes uses tacitly the same passage also in his Commentary on Metaphysics Delta 7. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5196","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5196,"authors_free":[{"id":5987,"entry_id":5196,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":831,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","free_first_name":"Cecilia","free_last_name":"Martini Bonadeo","norm_person":{"id":831,"first_name":"Cecilia","last_name":"Martini Bonadeo","full_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047649543","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/305196685","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cecilia Martini Bonadeo"}}],"entry_title":"A reference to al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee\u2019s Kit\u00e2b al-hur\u00fbf in Averroes\u2019 critique of Avicenna (Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A reference to al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee\u2019s Kit\u00e2b al-hur\u00fbf in Averroes\u2019 critique of Avicenna (Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges)"},"abstract":"Al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s Book of Letters (Kit\u0101b al-\u1e25ur\u016bf) and the analyses devoted in this text to the terminology of \u201cbeing\u201d are authoritative references for Averroes from the epitomes of his youth to his mature treatises. Also the Farabian doctrine of the conventionality of the natural language plays a role in Averroes\u2019 thought. This paper discusses the Tah\u0101fut al-Tah\u0101fut, (pp.371,5-372.12 Bouyges), where Averroes has recourse to the Book of Letters in criticizing Avicenna\u2019s distinction between essence and existence. Averroes explicitly mentions the title of the work and recalls a passage from the fifteenth chapter. This passage had already inspired him in the Epitome on Metaphysics, where Averroes did not mention explicitly his source, but followed in al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s footsteps as for the analysis of the uses of \u201cbeing\u201d. Averroes uses tacitly the same passage also in his Commentary on Metaphysics Delta 7.","btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":831,"full_name":"Cecilia Martini Bonadeo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5196,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studi Magrebini","volume":"12-13 ","issue":"","pages":"433-452"}},"sort":["A reference to al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee\u2019s Kit\u00e2b al-hur\u00fbf in Averroes\u2019 critique of Avicenna (Tah\u00e2fut al-Tah\u00e2fut, 371,5-372,12 Bouyges)"]}
| Title | Al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd on the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Comparative Islamic Studies |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 247–253 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Theology |
| Author(s) | Ainur D. Kurmanalieva |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1429","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1429,"authors_free":[{"id":1624,"entry_id":1429,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1337,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ainur D. Kurmanalieva","free_first_name":"Ainur D.","free_last_name":"Kurmanalieva","norm_person":{"id":1337,"first_name":"Ainur D.","last_name":"Kurmanalieva","full_name":"Ainur D. Kurmanalieva","short_ident":"AinKur","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ainur D. Kurmanalieva"}}],"entry_title":"Al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd on the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd on the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1337,"full_name":"Ainur D. Kurmanalieva","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1429,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Islamic Studies","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"247\u2013253"}},"sort":["Al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd on the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion"]}
| Title | Arabic/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas’s Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A.1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | The Thomist |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 509–550 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, al-Fārābī, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Avicenna, Alexander of Aphrodisias |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5321","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5321,"authors_free":[{"id":6153,"entry_id":5321,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A.1","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A.1"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/tho.2012.0000","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5321,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Thomist","volume":"76","issue":"4","pages":"509\u2013550"}},"sort":["Arabic\/Islamic Philosophy in Thomas Aquinas\u2019s Conception of the Beatific Vision in IV Sent., D. 49, Q. 2, A.1"]}
| Title | Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Averroes and Aquinas. Four Views on Philosophy and Religion |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1980 |
| Journal | Sind University Research Journal. Arts Series, Humanities, Social Sciences |
| Volume | 19 |
| Pages | 1–20 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Shafqat A. Shah , Shafqat A. Shah |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"949","_score":null,"_source":{"id":949,"authors_free":[{"id":1118,"entry_id":949,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1044,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","free_first_name":"Shafqat A.","free_last_name":"Shah","norm_person":{"id":1044,"first_name":"Shafqat A.","last_name":"Shah","full_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shafqat A. Shah"}},{"id":1119,"entry_id":949,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1044,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","free_first_name":"Shafqat A.","free_last_name":"Shah","norm_person":{"id":1044,"first_name":"Shafqat A.","last_name":"Shah","full_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shafqat A. Shah"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Averroes and Aquinas. Four Views on Philosophy and Religion","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Averroes and Aquinas. Four Views on Philosophy and Religion"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1980","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1044,"full_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","role":1},{"id":1044,"full_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":949,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Sind University Research Journal. Arts Series, Humanities, Social Sciences","volume":"19","issue":null,"pages":"1\u201320"}},"sort":["Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Averroes and Aquinas. Four Views on Philosophy and Religion"]}
| Title | Citer/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rhétorique d’Aristote par Hermann l’Allemand et les citations d’al-Fârâbî et Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 28 |
| Pages | 177–218 |
| Categories | Aristotle, al-Fārābī, Tradition and Reception, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Frédérique Woerther |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5200","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5200,"authors_free":[{"id":5993,"entry_id":5200,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"Citer\/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote par Hermann l\u2019Allemand et les citations d\u2019al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee et Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Citer\/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote par Hermann l\u2019Allemand et les citations d\u2019al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee et Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5200,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"28","issue":"","pages":"177\u2013218"}},"sort":["Citer\/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote par Hermann l\u2019Allemand et les citations d\u2019al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee et Averro\u00e8s"]}
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5258","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5258,"authors_free":[{"id":6067,"entry_id":5258,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mustafa Yildiz","free_first_name":"Mustafa","free_last_name":"Yildiz","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Conceiving Religion: Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes on the Concepts of \u201cMillah\u201d and \u201cShar\u00eeah\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Conceiving Religion: Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes on the Concepts of \u201cMillah\u201d and \u201cShar\u00eeah\u201d"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/islamicphil2016104","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5258,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Philosophy","volume":"10","issue":"","pages":"62\u2013103"}},"sort":["Conceiving Religion: Al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee and Averroes on the Concepts of \u201cMillah\u201d and \u201cShar\u00eeah\u201d"]}
| Title | From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2020 |
| Journal | Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 312-327 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Medicine |
| Author(s) | Miquel Forcada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rushd consideró la medicina como un arte productivo en su al-Kulliyyāt fī l-ṭibb, escrito entre 1162 y 1169, y como una ciencia en su comentario al poema de Ibn Sīnā sobre la medicina (Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb), escrito en 1180. En Kulliyyāt, Ibn Rushd sigue de manera bastante estricta las ideas sobre el estatus de la medicina del filósofo al-Fārābī. En Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, Ibn Rushd sintetiza las concepciones de varias obras, entre las cuales Masā’il fī l-ṭibb de Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq y Ḥubaysh, Qānūn fī l-ṭibb de Ibn Sinā y las obras sobre la lógica aristotélica de al-Fārābī. El análisis conjunto de estas fuentes, más las aportaciones de un nuevo manuscrito de Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, proporcionan una idea más clara de la concepción de la medicina expuesta en esta obra y, en consecuencia, podemos reconsiderar y relativizar la diferencia entre esta concepción y la que se expone en Kulliyyāt. Las ideas de Ibn Rushd sobre el estatus de la medicina se analizan de acuerdo con el contexto sociopolítico en que fueron concebidas, considerando especialmente el hecho de que Sharḥ Urjūza Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb fue escrito para las elites intelectuales y políticas del régimen almohad. Ibn Rushd considered medicine as a productive art in his al-Kulliyyāt fī l-ṭibb, written between 1162 and 1169, and as a science in his commentary on Ibn Sīnā’s poem on the subject (Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb), written in 1180. In Kulliyyāt, Ibn Rushd followed quite strictly the ideas on the status of medicine propounded by the philosopher al-Fārābī. In Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, Ibn Rushd summarised the conceptions of several works including Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq’s Masā’il fīl-ṭibb, Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn fī l-ṭibb and al-Fārābī’s works on Aristotle’s logic. The joint analysis of these sources and the evidence provided by a new manuscript of Ibn Rushd’s Sharḥ give us a clearer idea of the conception of medicine extant in this latter work and, in consequence, we can reconsider and relativise the difference between it and the conception expounded in Kulliyyāt. Ibn Rushd’s ideas on the status of medicine are analysed according to the sociopolitical context in which they were conceived, taking particular account of the fact that Sharḥ Urjūza Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb was written for the intellectual and political elites of the Almohad regime. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5592","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5592,"authors_free":[{"id":6491,"entry_id":5592,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Miquel Forcada","free_first_name":"Miquel","free_last_name":"Forcada","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition"},"abstract":" Ibn Rushd consider\u00f3 la medicina como un arte productivo en su al-Kulliyy\u0101t f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb, escrito entre 1162 y 1169, y como una ciencia en su comentario al poema de Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 sobre la medicina (Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb), escrito en 1180. En Kulliyy\u0101t, Ibn Rushd sigue de manera bastante estricta las ideas sobre el estatus de la medicina del fil\u00f3sofo al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. En Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, Ibn Rushd sintetiza las concepciones de varias obras, entre las cuales Mas\u0101\u2019il f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb de \u1e24unayn ibn Is\u1e25\u0101q y \u1e24ubaysh, Q\u0101n\u016bn f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb de Ibn Sin\u0101 y las obras sobre la l\u00f3gica aristot\u00e9lica de al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. El an\u00e1lisis conjunto de estas fuentes, m\u00e1s las aportaciones de un nuevo manuscrito de Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, proporcionan una idea m\u00e1s clara de la concepci\u00f3n de la medicina expuesta en esta obra y, en consecuencia, podemos reconsiderar y relativizar la diferencia entre esta concepci\u00f3n y la que se expone en Kulliyy\u0101t. Las ideas de Ibn Rushd sobre el estatus de la medicina se analizan de acuerdo con el contexto sociopol\u00edtico en que fueron concebidas, considerando especialmente el hecho de que Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bza Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb fue escrito para las elites intelectuales y pol\u00edticas del r\u00e9gimen almohad.\r\n\r\nIbn Rushd considered medicine as a productive art in his al-Kulliyy\u0101t f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb, written between 1162 and 1169, and as a science in his commentary on Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s poem on the subject (Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb), written in 1180. In Kulliyy\u0101t, Ibn Rushd followed quite strictly the ideas on the status of medicine propounded by the philosopher al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. In Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, Ibn Rushd summarised the conceptions of several works including \u1e24unayn ibn Is\u1e25\u0101q\u2019s Mas\u0101\u2019il f\u012bl-\u1e6dibb, Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s Q\u0101n\u016bn f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb and al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s works on Aristotle\u2019s logic. The joint analysis of these sources and the evidence provided by a new manuscript of Ibn Rushd\u2019s Shar\u1e25 give us a clearer idea of the conception of medicine extant in this latter work and, in consequence, we can reconsider and relativise the difference between it and the conception expounded in Kulliyy\u0101t. Ibn Rushd\u2019s ideas on the status of \r\nmedicine are analysed according to the sociopolitical context in which they were conceived, taking particular account of the fact that Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bza Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb was written for the intellectual and political elites of the Almohad regime.","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/asclepio.2020.13","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5592,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","volume":"72","issue":"2","pages":"312-327"}},"sort":["From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition"]}
| Title | Fārābī and Theodorus as Interlopers. Some Erroneously Identified Manuscripts of Averroes’s Middle Commentaries on Aristotle’s Logical Works |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1978 |
| Journal | Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale |
| Volume | 20 |
| Pages | 48–52 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī |
| Author(s) | Charles E. Butterworth |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1682","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1682,"authors_free":[{"id":1942,"entry_id":1682,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":123,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","free_first_name":"Charles E.","free_last_name":"Butterworth","norm_person":{"id":123,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/105338856X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/41853950","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles E. Butterworth"}}],"entry_title":"F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Theodorus as Interlopers. Some Erroneously Identified Manuscripts of Averroes\u2019s Middle Commentaries on Aristotle\u2019s Logical Works","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Theodorus as Interlopers. Some Erroneously Identified Manuscripts of Averroes\u2019s Middle Commentaries on Aristotle\u2019s Logical Works"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1978","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":123,"full_name":"Charles E. Butterworth","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1682,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"20","issue":null,"pages":"48\u201352"}},"sort":["F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Theodorus as Interlopers. Some Erroneously Identified Manuscripts of Averroes\u2019s Middle Commentaries on Aristotle\u2019s Logical Works"]}
| Title | Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush’d |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | The Review of Metaphysics |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41–61 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, al-Ġazālī, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Michael Sweeney |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23055682 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5377","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5377,"authors_free":[{"id":6229,"entry_id":5377,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Sweeney","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Sweeney","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d"},"abstract":"The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23055682","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5377,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Review of Metaphysics","volume":"65","issue":"1","pages":"41\u201361"}},"sort":["Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d"]}
| Title | Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 51–74 |
| Categories | Logic, Alexander of Aphrodisias, al-Fārābī, Aristotle, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rušd devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26–30). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-Fārābī and Alexander, on the basis of al-Fārābī's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-Fārābī's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5–20). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"479","_score":null,"_source":{"id":479,"authors_free":[{"id":623,"entry_id":479,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"},"abstract":"Ibn Ru\u0161d devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26\u201330). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Alexander, on the basis of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5\u201320). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":479,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"51\u201374"}},"sort":["Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"]}