| Title | Raison et démonstration. Les commentaires médiévaux sur les Seconds Analytiques |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2013 |
| Publication Place | Turnhout |
| Publisher | Brepolis |
| Series | Studia artistarum |
| Volume | 40 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Joël Biard |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Durant au moins deux millénaires, les Seconds Analytiques d’Aristote ont joué un rôle de premier plan dans la réflexion sur la science, ses objets et ses procédures. On a souvent retenu la structure syllogistique comme élément essentiel de cette conception. Mais le traité examine aussi de nombreuses autres questions relevant de la philosophie des sciences : statut des principes, nature des prémisses, fonction du moyen terme, rapport entre causalité réelle et causalité épistémique, diversité des types de démonstration, rôle des définitions, confrontation du modèle ainsi élaboré avec les mathématiques. Chaque fois, c’est toute une série de nouveaux problèmes qui surgit à partir ou à l’occasion du texte aristotélicien, amplifiés par la suite des exégèses auxquelles celui-ci a donné lieu. L’objet de cet ouvrage collectif est d’étudier quelques moments majeurs des interprétations et usages des Seconds Analytiques. Il n’entre pas dans les débats contemporains concernant le texte même d’Aristote et n’examine que de façon marginale les premiers commentaires grecs ; il a pour objet premier leur transmission ultérieure jusque dans l’occident médiéval. Dans ce parcours, il prend en compte le monde byzantin et le monde arabe. Une grande partie de l’ouvrage est ensuite consacrée aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles en Occident médiéval, mais on trouvera aussi quelques études examinant la place des Seconds Analytiques chez quelques humanistes italiens ou dans le nominalisme du début du XVIe siècle. Ce volume propose ainsi une histoire de la transmission et de l’interprétation de ce texte, tout en visant à éclairer quelques questions importantes pour la nature de la démonstration et de la connaissance scientifique. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2046","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2046,"authors_free":[{"id":2489,"entry_id":2046,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1302,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jo\u00ebl Biard","free_first_name":"Jo\u00ebl","free_last_name":"Biard","norm_person":{"id":1302,"first_name":"Jo\u00ebl","last_name":"Biard","full_name":"Jo\u00ebl Biard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111891027","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/85246900","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jo\u00ebl Biard"}}],"entry_title":"Raison et d\u00e9monstration. Les commentaires m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux sur les Seconds Analytiques","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Raison et d\u00e9monstration. Les commentaires m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux sur les Seconds Analytiques"},"abstract":"Durant au moins deux mill\u00e9naires, les Seconds Analytiques d\u2019Aristote ont jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le de premier plan dans la r\u00e9flexion sur la science, ses objets et ses proc\u00e9dures. On a souvent retenu la structure syllogistique comme \u00e9l\u00e9ment essentiel de cette conception. Mais le trait\u00e9 examine aussi de nombreuses autres questions relevant de la philosophie des sciences : statut des principes, nature des pr\u00e9misses, fonction du moyen terme, rapport entre causalit\u00e9 r\u00e9elle et causalit\u00e9 \u00e9pist\u00e9mique, diversit\u00e9 des types de d\u00e9monstration, r\u00f4le des d\u00e9finitions, confrontation du mod\u00e8le ainsi \u00e9labor\u00e9 avec les math\u00e9matiques. Chaque fois, c\u2019est toute une s\u00e9rie de nouveaux probl\u00e8mes qui surgit \u00e0 partir ou \u00e0 l\u2019occasion du texte aristot\u00e9licien, amplifi\u00e9s par la suite des ex\u00e9g\u00e8ses auxquelles celui-ci a donn\u00e9 lieu.\r\n\r\nL\u2019objet de cet ouvrage collectif est d\u2019\u00e9tudier quelques moments majeurs des interpr\u00e9tations et usages des Seconds Analytiques. Il n\u2019entre pas dans les d\u00e9bats contemporains concernant le texte m\u00eame d\u2019Aristote et n\u2019examine que de fa\u00e7on marginale les premiers commentaires grecs ; il a pour objet premier leur transmission ult\u00e9rieure jusque dans l\u2019occident m\u00e9di\u00e9val. Dans ce parcours, il prend en compte le monde byzantin et le monde arabe. Une grande partie de l\u2019ouvrage est ensuite consacr\u00e9e aux XIIIe et XIVe si\u00e8cles en Occident m\u00e9di\u00e9val, mais on trouvera aussi quelques \u00e9tudes examinant la place des Seconds Analytiques chez quelques humanistes italiens ou dans le nominalisme du d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle.\r\nCe volume propose ainsi une histoire de la transmission et de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de ce texte, tout en visant \u00e0 \u00e9clairer quelques questions importantes pour la nature de la d\u00e9monstration et de la connaissance scientifique.","btype":1,"date":"2013","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1484\/M.SA-EB.6.09070802050003050504040002","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1302,"full_name":"Jo\u00ebl Biard","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":2046,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepolis","series":"Studia artistarum","volume":"40","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averroè alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | L'averroismo in età moderna (1400–1700) |
| Pages | 15–23 |
| Categories | Commentary, Metaphysics, Tradition and Reception, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Mauro Zonta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5285","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5285,"authors_free":[{"id":6104,"entry_id":5285,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averro\u00e8 alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averro\u00e8 alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5285,"section_of":2007,"pages":"15\u201323","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":2007,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":1811,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":null,"title":"L'averroismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":1,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":2007,"pubplace":"Macerata","publisher":"Quodlibet Studio","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe |
| Pages | 65–80 |
| Categories | Averroism, Aristotle, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Despite Renaissance humanists’ polemics against Averroes, interest in his writings grew during the sixteenth century. This interest was related to humanism. As Aristotelians became increasingly aware of the Greek commentators on Aristotle, many saw Averroes as an heir to the ancient tradition. Thus they believed that by reading his works they could gain access to a purer form of Aristotelianism. As a result, a number of scholars wrote commentaries on Averroes’s natural philosophical works, and the Commentator became a subject for both philosophical and philological commentary. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1743","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1743,"authors_free":[{"id":2010,"entry_id":1743,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance"},"abstract":"Despite Renaissance humanists\u2019 polemics against Averroes, interest in his writings grew during the sixteenth century. This interest was related to humanism. As Aristotelians became increasingly aware of the Greek commentators on Aristotle, many saw Averroes as an heir to the ancient tradition. Thus they believed that by reading his works they could gain access to a purer form of Aristotelianism. As a result, a number of scholars wrote commentaries on Averroes\u2019s natural philosophical works, and the Commentator became a subject for both philosophical and philological commentary.","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5240-5_4","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1743,"section_of":241,"pages":"65\u201380","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":241,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":241,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Springer","series":"International Archives of the History of Ideas","volume":"211","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Pauli Veneti, Expositio in duodecim libros Metaphisice Aristotelis |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters |
| Volume | 110/2 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Tradition and Reception, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Gabriele Galluzzo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Focusing on the medieval reception of Book Zeta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Volume One of this work offers an unprecedented and philosophically oriented study of medieval ontology against the background of the current metaphysical debate on the nature of material objects. Volume Two makes available to scholars one of the culminating points in the medieval reception of Aristotle’s metaphysical thought by presenting the first critical edition of Book VII of Paul of Venice’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics (1420-1424) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5243","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5243,"authors_free":[{"id":6052,"entry_id":5243,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1288,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","free_first_name":"Gabriele","free_last_name":"Galluzzo","norm_person":{"id":1288,"first_name":"Gabriele","last_name":"Galluzzo","full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1027244637","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61842398","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gabriele Galluzzo"}}],"entry_title":"Pauli Veneti, Expositio in duodecim libros Metaphisice Aristotelis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pauli Veneti, Expositio in duodecim libros Metaphisice Aristotelis"},"abstract":"Focusing on the medieval reception of Book Zeta of Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics, Volume One of this work offers an unprecedented and philosophically oriented study of medieval ontology against the background of the current metaphysical debate on the nature of material objects. Volume Two makes available to scholars one of the culminating points in the medieval reception of Aristotle\u2019s metaphysical thought by presenting the first critical edition of Book VII of Paul of Venice\u2019s Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Metaphysics (1420-1424)","btype":1,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004235021 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1288,"full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5243,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters","volume":"110\/2","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Contraires et accidents: la question de la generation absolue dans le Commentaire Moyen d’Averroès au De generatione et corruptione d’Aristote |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Circolazione dei saperi nel Mediterraneo. Filosofia e scienze (secoli IX-XVII). Circulation des savoirs autour de la Méditerranée. Philosophie et sciences (IXe-XVIIe siècle). Atti del VII Colloquio Internazionale della Société Internationale d’Histoire des Sciences et de la Philosophie Arabes et Islamiques, Firenze, 16-28 febbraio 2006 |
| Pages | 377–391 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5303","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.title.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5303,"authors_free":[{"id":6133,"entry_id":5303,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Contraires et accidents: la question de la generation absolue dans le Commentaire Moyen d\u2019Averro\u00e8s au De generatione et corruptione d\u2019Aristote","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Contraires et accidents: la question de la generation absolue dans le Commentaire Moyen d\u2019Averro\u00e8s au De generatione et corruptione d\u2019Aristote"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5303,"section_of":5304,"pages":"377\u2013391","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5304,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Circolazione dei saperi nel Mediterraneo. Filosofia e scienze (secoli IX-XVII). Circulation des savoirs autour de la M\u00e9diterran\u00e9e. Philosophie et sciences (IXe-XVIIe si\u00e8cle). Atti del VII Colloquio Internazionale della Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 Internationale d\u2019Histoire des Sciences et de la Philosophie Arabes et Islamiques, Firenze, 16-28 febbraio 2006","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5304,"pubplace":"Florence","publisher":"Cadmo","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2013]}
| Title | Mélange, minima naturalia et croissance animale dans le Commentaire moyen d’Averroès au De generatione et corruptione, I, 5 |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2012 |
| Published in | La nature et le vide dans la physique médiévale: études dédiées à Edward Grant |
| Pages | 137–164 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5231","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5231,"authors_free":[{"id":6040,"entry_id":5231,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"M\u00e9lange, minima naturalia et croissance animale dans le Commentaire moyen d\u2019Averro\u00e8s au De generatione et corruptione, I, 5","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"M\u00e9lange, minima naturalia et croissance animale dans le Commentaire moyen d\u2019Averro\u00e8s au De generatione et corruptione, I, 5"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2012","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/M.SA_EB.1.101015","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5231,"section_of":5230,"pages":"137\u2013164","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5230,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"La nature et le vide dans la physique m\u00e9di\u00e9vale: \u00e9tudes d\u00e9di\u00e9es \u00e0 Edward Grant","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2012","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Loin d\u2019\u00eatre simplement \u00e9cart\u00e9 par principe, loin m\u00eame d\u2019\u00eatre un th\u00e8me marginal ou une difficult\u00e9 \u00e0 \u00e9viter, le vide est tout au long du Moyen \u00c2ge l\u2019objet de nombreuses analyses. Les contributions rassembl\u00e9es dans cet ouvrage examinent quelques-uns des principaux d\u00e9veloppements qui prennent le vide comme objet ou comme moyen, dans le monde arabe comme dans le monde m\u00e9di\u00e9val latin. Ils traitent du vide en dehors du monde comme du vide \u00e0 l\u2019int\u00e9rieur du monde, des diff\u00e9rentes d\u00e9finitions du vide, de son rapport au lieu ou bien au mouvement. Ils concernent la physique ou la cosmologie, mais aussi la biologie. Nous avons souhait\u00e9 d\u00e9dier ces \u00e9tudes \u00e0 Edward Grant qui, le premier, a mis en lumi\u00e8re l\u2019\u00e9tendue des probl\u00e8mes scientifiques trait\u00e9s par les M\u00e9di\u00e9vaux \u00e0 l\u2019aide du concept de vide.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"10.1484\/M.SA-EB.6.09070802050003050404070602","book":{"id":5230,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepols","series":"Studia artistarum","volume":"32","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Long Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Ishraq. Islamic Philosophy Yearbook |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 380–407 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, De anima |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Y. Eshots , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | N. V. Efremova |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1756","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1756,"authors_free":[{"id":2023,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":2024,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1488,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Y. Eshots","free_first_name":"Y.","free_last_name":"Eshots","norm_person":{"id":1488,"first_name":"Y.","last_name":"Eshots","full_name":"Y. Eshots","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/282454899","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Y. Eshots"}},{"id":2026,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1487,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"N. V. Efremova","free_first_name":"N. V.","free_last_name":"Efremova","norm_person":{"id":1487,"first_name":"N. V.","last_name":"Efremova","full_name":"N. V. Efremova","short_ident":"NVEfr","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=N. V. Efremova"}}],"entry_title":"Long Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s De anima","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Long Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s De anima"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":1488,"full_name":"Y. Eshots","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1756,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ishraq. Islamic Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"3","issue":null,"pages":"380\u2013407"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Translating Catharsis: Aristotle and Averroës, the Scholastics and the Basochiens |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Published in | Rethinking Medieval Translation: Ethics, Politics, Theory |
| Pages | 84–106 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Transmission, Poetics |
| Author(s) | Noah D. Guynn |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This essay investigates translation, aesthetics and performance in the long Middle Ages, with particular emphasis on the transmission of Aristotle and the politics of festive drama: plays staged in public spaces for heterogeneous audiences during religious holidays. My main interest is κάθαρσις (katharsis), an abstruse term from the Poetics and Politics that gets translated and deployed in diverse, often incompatible ways by premodern and modern scholars and that has been used, both implicitly and explicitly, to account for the dynamics of performance and ritual in medieval festive settings. Though the Politics was widely available in Latin translation from 1260 on, its references to catharsis pertain mostly to musical aesthetics, and medieval intellectuals do not seem to have drawn from it a theory of theatrical reception. As for the Poetics, it was known almost exclusively through Averroës's Middle Commentary (1175), which Hermannus Alemannus translated into Latin in 1256. Having no understanding of Greek tragedy as theatre, Averroës, in keeping with previous Arabic readings of Aristotle, reorients the Poetics away from aesthetics towards logic. That tradition renders mimesis as the use of imaginative representations to move audiences unable to grasp more conclusive forms of reasoning to embrace the good. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5369","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5369,"authors_free":[{"id":6221,"entry_id":5369,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Noah D. Guynn","free_first_name":"Noah D.","free_last_name":"Guynn","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Translating Catharsis: Aristotle and Averro\u00ebs, the Scholastics and the Basochiens","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Translating Catharsis: Aristotle and Averro\u00ebs, the Scholastics and the Basochiens"},"abstract":"This essay investigates translation, aesthetics and performance in the long Middle Ages, with particular emphasis on the transmission of Aristotle and the politics of festive drama: plays staged in public spaces for heterogeneous audiences during religious holidays. My main interest is \u03ba\u03ac\u03b8\u03b1\u03c1\u03c3\u03b9\u03c2 (katharsis), an abstruse term from the Poetics and Politics that gets translated and deployed in diverse, often incompatible ways by premodern and modern scholars and that has been used, both implicitly and explicitly, to account for the dynamics of performance and ritual in medieval festive settings. Though the Politics was widely available in Latin translation from 1260 on, its references to catharsis pertain mostly to musical aesthetics, and medieval intellectuals do not seem to have drawn from it a theory of theatrical reception. As for the Poetics, it was known almost exclusively through Averro\u00ebs's Middle Commentary (1175), which Hermannus Alemannus translated into Latin in 1256. Having no understanding of Greek tragedy as theatre, Averro\u00ebs, in keeping with previous Arabic readings of Aristotle, reorients the Poetics away from aesthetics towards logic. That tradition renders mimesis as the use of imaginative representations to move audiences unable to grasp more conclusive forms of reasoning to embrace the good.","btype":2,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5369,"section_of":5368,"pages":"84\u2013106","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5368,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Rethinking Medieval Translation: Ethics, Politics, Theory","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2012","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"\u2018Engaging and informative to read, challenging in its assertions, and provocative in the best way, inviting the reader to sift, correlate and reflect on the broader applicability of points made in reference to a specific text or exchange.\u2019 Professor Carolyne P. Collette, Mount Holyoke College. Medieval notions of \u2018translatio\u2019 raise issues that have since been debated in contemporary translation studies concerning the translator's role as interpreter or author; the ability of translation to reinforce or unsettle linguistic or political dominance; and translation's capacity for establishing cultural contact, or participating in cultural appropriation or effacement. This collection puts these ethical and political issues centre stage, asking whether questions currently being posed by theorists of translation need rethinking or revising when brought into dialogue with medieval examples. Contributors explore translation - as a practice, a necessity, an impossibility and a multi-media form - through multiple perspectives on language, theory, dissemination and cultural transmission. Exploring texts, authors, languages and genres not often brought together in a single volume, individual essays focus on topics such as the politics of multilingualism, the role of translation in conflict situations, the translator's invisibility, hospitality, untranslatability and the limits of translation as a category. Emma Campbell is Associate Professor in French at the University of Warwick; Robert Mills is Lecturer in History of Art at University College London. Contributors: William Burgwinkle, Ardis Butterfield, Emma Campbell, Marilynn Desmond, Simon Gaunt, Jane Gilbert, Miranda Griffin, Noah D. Guynn, Catherine L\u00e9glu, Robert Mills, Zrinka Stahuljak, Luke Sunderland","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5368,"pubplace":"","publisher":"Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6219,"entry_id":5368,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Emma Campbell","free_first_name":"Emma","free_last_name":"Campbell","norm_person":null},{"id":6220,"entry_id":5368,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Robert Mills","free_first_name":"Robert","free_last_name":"Mills","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Questions of Methodology in Aristotle’s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Biology |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 329–352 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Tradition and Reception, Commentary, Gersonides |
| Author(s) | Ahuva Gaziel |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| During the Middle Ages Aristotle’s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle’s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes’ commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle’s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5313","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5313,"authors_free":[{"id":6144,"entry_id":5313,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahuva Gaziel","free_first_name":"Ahuva","free_last_name":"Gaziel","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective"},"abstract":"During the Middle Ages Aristotle\u2019s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle\u2019s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle\u2019s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes\u2019 commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle\u2019s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle\u2019s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10739-011-9284-6","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5313,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Biology","volume":"45","issue":"2 ","pages":"329\u2013352"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Textual and Philosophical Issues in Averroes’s Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Published in | The Letter before the Spirit. The Importance of Text Editions for the Study of the Reception of Aristotle |
| Pages | 267–287 |
| Categories | Aristotle, De anima, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1795","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1795,"authors_free":[{"id":2070,"entry_id":1795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Textual and Philosophical Issues in Averroes\u2019s Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Textual and Philosophical Issues in Averroes\u2019s Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004235083_014","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1795,"section_of":245,"pages":"267\u2013287","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":245,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"The Letter before the Spirit. The Importance of Text Editions for the Study of the Reception of Aristotle","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2012","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2012","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":245,"pubplace":"Leiden","publisher":"Brill","series":"Aristoteles Semitico-Latinus","volume":"22","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":373,"entry_id":245,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1499,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Afake M. I. van Oppenraay","free_first_name":"Afake M. I.","free_last_name":"van Oppenraay","norm_person":{"id":1499,"first_name":"Afake M. I.","last_name":"van Oppenraay","full_name":"Afake M. I. van Oppenraay","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/115324461","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/22282908","db_url":"","from_claudius":1}},{"id":374,"entry_id":245,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":990,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Resianne Fontaine","free_first_name":"Resianne","free_last_name":"Fontaine","norm_person":{"id":990,"first_name":"Resianne","last_name":"Fontaine","full_name":"Resianne Fontaine","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/115858474","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/4981063","db_url":"","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Ibn Rušd et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aperçu sur un problème de syllogistique modale |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 51–74 |
| Categories | Logic, Alexander of Aphrodisias, al-Fārābī, Aristotle, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rušd devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26–30). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-Fārābī and Alexander, on the basis of al-Fārābī's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-Fārābī's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5–20). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"479","_score":null,"_source":{"id":479,"authors_free":[{"id":623,"entry_id":479,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"},"abstract":"Ibn Ru\u0161d devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26\u201330). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Alexander, on the basis of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5\u201320). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":479,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"51\u201374"}},"sort":["Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"]}
| Title | Il libro Epsilon della Metafisica di Aristotele nell’Epitome di Aevrroè (1126-1198) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale |
| Volume | 59 |
| Pages | 33–56 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Theology, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Carmela Baffioni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article deals with Averroes’s interpretation of Metaph. Ε 1, where Aristotle discusses the nature and object of metaphysics, as well as its place in the hierarchy of sciences. Among Averroes’s predecessors, al-Kindī seems to see a coincidence between metaphysics and theology, since God can be described as the “first cause of everything”. However, al-Fārābī and Avicenna discovered that “first philosophy” could be conceived as an ontology distinct from theology; moreover, they considered theology to be only a part of metaphysics, not even the most important one. In the Great Commentary on Metaphysics - where the Arabic translation of the work by the Jacobite monk Usṭāth is quoted, Averroes often just paraphrases the original passages. One may infer that theology in the strict sense is merely mentioned by way of example. In the Epitome of Metaphysics, the objects of metaphysics are “general” ones; metaphysics studies the “absolute being” and cannot be identified with theology as “pertaining to God”. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5124","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5124,"authors_free":[{"id":5899,"entry_id":5124,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":754,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Carmela Baffioni","free_first_name":"Carmela","free_last_name":"Baffioni","norm_person":{"id":754,"first_name":"Carmela","last_name":"Baffioni","full_name":"Carmela Baffioni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139175172","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/25088","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd139175172.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Carmela Baffioni"}}],"entry_title":"Il libro Epsilon della Metafisica di Aristotele nell\u2019Epitome di Aevrro\u00e8 (1126-1198)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Il libro Epsilon della Metafisica di Aristotele nell\u2019Epitome di Aevrro\u00e8 (1126-1198)"},"abstract":"This article deals with Averroes\u2019s interpretation of Metaph. \u0395 1, where Aristotle discusses the nature and object of metaphysics, as well as its place in the hierarchy of sciences. Among Averroes\u2019s predecessors, al-Kind\u012b seems to see a coincidence between metaphysics and theology, since God can be described as the \u201cfirst cause of everything\u201d. However, al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Avicenna discovered that \u201cfirst philosophy\u201d could be conceived as an ontology distinct from theology; moreover, they considered theology to be only a part of metaphysics, not even the most important one. In the Great Commentary on Metaphysics - where the Arabic translation of the work by the Jacobite monk Us\u1e6d\u0101th is quoted, Averroes often just paraphrases the original passages. One may infer that theology in the strict sense is merely mentioned by way of example. In the Epitome of Metaphysics, the objects of metaphysics are \u201cgeneral\u201d ones; metaphysics studies the \u201cabsolute being\u201d and cannot be identified with theology as \u201cpertaining to God\u201d.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/J.BPM.5.115828","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":754,"full_name":"Carmela Baffioni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5124,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"59","issue":"","pages":"33\u201356"}},"sort":["Il libro Epsilon della Metafisica di Aristotele nell\u2019Epitome di Aevrro\u00e8 (1126-1198)"]}
| Title | Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes’s Novel Placement of the Platonic City |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Published in | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
| Pages | 19–39 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Galen, Aristotle, Plato, Politics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Alexander Orwin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes's Commentary on Plato's “Republic” goes far beyond merely commenting on the original. With the benefit of 1,500 years of hindsight, it reckons with important works of philosophy that would have been completely unknown to Plato. Averroes mentions three authors of such works by name: Galen, whom he mostly rebukes, Aristotle, and Alfarabi. It would be hasty to assert that by including such extraneous material, Averroes departs from Plato, but, at the very least, he updates him on account of historical developments. The importance of Averroes's post-Platonic additions is evident from the very structure of the work. The part of it that can plausibly claim to be a commentary on Plato does not begin until 27.24, almost seven pages into Rosenthal's Hebrew text. Averroes begins to address the subject of war, corresponding to Republic 374b, having skipped all of book 1 and the majority of book 2, with only two brief references to them in the opening section (CR 22.27–30, 23.31–33, cf. 47.29–30and 105.25–27). Averroes does not justify his omission until the very end of the work, when he states that the opening part of the Republic does not contain any of the demonstrative arguments of which his commentary is comprised (CR 105.25–27, cf. 21.4). He is more immediately forthright about the reasons for what he includes in its place. In keeping with the demonstrative focus of the work, Averroes replaces Platonic dialectic with a substantial discussion of science. Having divided practical science into two parts, one about general habits and actions and another about their implementation, Averroes explains: “Before we begin a point-by-point explanation of what is in these arguments [of Plato], we ought to mention the things pertinent to this [second] part [of practical science] and explained in the first part, that serve as foundation for what we wish to say here at the beginning” (CR 22.6–8). Averroes's introduction concerns above all the first part of political science, while the Republic proper contains only the second. Averroes attributes to Plato only a small part of the ensuing discussion, concerning justice, the division of labor, and the arrangement of the soul (CR 22.22–24.6, esp. 22.27, 23.31). The other passages are inspired by Aristotle and especially Alfarabi. Averroes appears to substitute scientific arguments from Aristotle and Alfarabi—mainly about science, philosophy, courage, and war—for Plato's dialectical introduction about justice and the founding of the just city. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5347","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5347,"authors_free":[{"id":6197,"entry_id":5347,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1790,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":"Alexander","free_last_name":"Orwin","norm_person":{"id":1790,"first_name":" Alexander","last_name":" Orwin","full_name":" Alexander Orwin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/1153328348","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]= Alexander Orwin"}}],"entry_title":"Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City"},"abstract":"Averroes's Commentary on Plato's \u201cRepublic\u201d goes far beyond merely commenting on the original. With the benefit of 1,500 years of hindsight, it reckons with important works of philosophy that would have been completely unknown to Plato. Averroes mentions three authors of such works by name: Galen, whom he mostly rebukes, Aristotle, and Alfarabi. It would be hasty to assert that by including such extraneous material, Averroes departs from Plato, but, at the very least, he updates him on account of historical developments.\r\n\r\nThe importance of Averroes's post-Platonic additions is evident from the very structure of the work. The part of it that can plausibly claim to be a commentary on Plato does not begin until 27.24, almost seven pages into Rosenthal's Hebrew text. Averroes begins to address the subject of war, corresponding to Republic 374b, having skipped all of book 1 and the majority of book 2, with only two brief references to them in the opening section (CR 22.27\u201330, 23.31\u201333, cf. 47.29\u201330and 105.25\u201327). Averroes does not justify his omission until the very end of the work, when he states that the opening part of the Republic does not contain any of the demonstrative arguments of which his commentary is comprised (CR 105.25\u201327, cf. 21.4). He is more immediately forthright about the reasons for what he includes in its place. In keeping with the demonstrative focus of the work, Averroes replaces Platonic dialectic with a substantial discussion of science. Having divided practical science into two parts, one about general habits and actions and another about their implementation, Averroes explains: \u201cBefore we begin a point-by-point explanation of what is in these arguments [of Plato], we ought to mention the things pertinent to this [second] part [of practical science] and explained in the first part, that serve as foundation for what we wish to say here at the beginning\u201d (CR 22.6\u20138). Averroes's introduction concerns above all the first part of political science, while the Republic proper contains only the second. Averroes attributes to Plato only a small part of the ensuing discussion, concerning justice, the division of labor, and the arrangement of the soul (CR 22.22\u201324.6, esp. 22.27, 23.31). The other passages are inspired by Aristotle and especially Alfarabi. Averroes appears to substitute scientific arguments from Aristotle and Alfarabi\u2014mainly about science, philosophy, courage, and war\u2014for Plato's dialectical introduction about justice and the founding of the just city.","btype":2,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983.002","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1790,"full_name":" Alexander Orwin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5347,"section_of":5346,"pages":"19\u201339","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5346,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2022","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Imposing Alfarabi on Plato: Averroes\u2019s Novel Placement of the Platonic City"]}
| Title | Induction et certitude dans le Grand Commentaire d’Averroès aux Seconds Analytiques |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Raison et démonstration. Les commentaires médiévaux sur les Seconds Analytiques |
| Pages | 47–69 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Logic, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5271","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5271,"authors_free":[{"id":6085,"entry_id":5271,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Induction et certitude dans le Grand Commentaire d\u2019Averro\u00e8s aux Seconds Analytiques","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Induction et certitude dans le Grand Commentaire d\u2019Averro\u00e8s aux Seconds Analytiques"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5271,"section_of":2046,"pages":"47\u201369","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":2046,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":1851,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"no language selected","title":"Raison et d\u00e9monstration. Les commentaires m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux sur les Seconds Analytiques","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":"Durant au moins deux mill\u00e9naires, les Seconds Analytiques d\u2019Aristote ont jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le de premier plan dans la r\u00e9flexion sur la science, ses objets et ses proc\u00e9dures. On a souvent retenu la structure syllogistique comme \u00e9l\u00e9ment essentiel de cette conception. Mais le trait\u00e9 examine aussi de nombreuses autres questions relevant de la philosophie des sciences : statut des principes, nature des pr\u00e9misses, fonction du moyen terme, rapport entre causalit\u00e9 r\u00e9elle et causalit\u00e9 \u00e9pist\u00e9mique, diversit\u00e9 des types de d\u00e9monstration, r\u00f4le des d\u00e9finitions, confrontation du mod\u00e8le ainsi \u00e9labor\u00e9 avec les math\u00e9matiques. Chaque fois, c\u2019est toute une s\u00e9rie de nouveaux probl\u00e8mes qui surgit \u00e0 partir ou \u00e0 l\u2019occasion du texte aristot\u00e9licien, amplifi\u00e9s par la suite des ex\u00e9g\u00e8ses auxquelles celui-ci a donn\u00e9 lieu.\r\n\r\nL\u2019objet de cet ouvrage collectif est d\u2019\u00e9tudier quelques moments majeurs des interpr\u00e9tations et usages des Seconds Analytiques. Il n\u2019entre pas dans les d\u00e9bats contemporains concernant le texte m\u00eame d\u2019Aristote et n\u2019examine que de fa\u00e7on marginale les premiers commentaires grecs ; il a pour objet premier leur transmission ult\u00e9rieure jusque dans l\u2019occident m\u00e9di\u00e9val. Dans ce parcours, il prend en compte le monde byzantin et le monde arabe. Une grande partie de l\u2019ouvrage est ensuite consacr\u00e9e aux XIIIe et XIVe si\u00e8cles en Occident m\u00e9di\u00e9val, mais on trouvera aussi quelques \u00e9tudes examinant la place des Seconds Analytiques chez quelques humanistes italiens ou dans le nominalisme du d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle.\r\nCe volume propose ainsi une histoire de la transmission et de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de ce texte, tout en visant \u00e0 \u00e9clairer quelques questions importantes pour la nature de la d\u00e9monstration et de la connaissance scientifique.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":1,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1484\/M.SA-EB.6.09070802050003050504040002","book":{"id":2046,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepolis","series":"Studia artistarum","volume":"40","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Induction et certitude dans le Grand Commentaire d\u2019Averro\u00e8s aux Seconds Analytiques"]}
| Title | Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion? |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Published in | Averroes’ Natural Philosophy and its Reception in the Latin West |
| Pages | 89–126 |
| Categories | Aristotle, De caelo, Physics, Avicenna, Albert, Thomas, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Silvia Donati |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5233","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5233,"authors_free":[{"id":6042,"entry_id":5233,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":897,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Donati","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Donati","norm_person":{"id":897,"first_name":"Silvia","last_name":"Donati","full_name":"Silvia Donati","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1036991423","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54181913","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Silvia Donati"}}],"entry_title":"Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion?"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":66,"category_name":"De caelo","link":"bib?categories[]=De caelo"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":897,"full_name":"Silvia Donati","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5233,"section_of":5224,"pages":"89\u2013126","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5224,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Averroes\u2019 Natural Philosophy and its Reception in the Latin West","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2015","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5224,"pubplace":"Leuven","publisher":"Leuven University Press","series":"Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, De Wulf-Mansion Centre, Series 1","volume":"50","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Is Celestial Motion a Natural Motion?"]}
| Title | John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes’ Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3 |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Published in | Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives |
| Pages | 127–134 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Physics, Averroism |
| Author(s) | Andrea Vella |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5106","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5106,"authors_free":[{"id":5881,"entry_id":5106,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1275,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andrea Vella","free_first_name":"Andrea","free_last_name":"Vella","norm_person":{"id":1275,"first_name":"Andrea","last_name":"Vella","full_name":"Andrea Vella","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/141393246","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andrea Vella"}}],"entry_title":"John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes\u2019 Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes\u2019 Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1275,"full_name":"Andrea Vella","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5106,"section_of":5105,"pages":"127\u2013134","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5105,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"en","title":"Reason and No-reason from Ancient Philosophy to Neurosciences: : Old Parameters, New Perspectives","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2017","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"The reason\/no-reason conceptual pair (also declinable in the similar forms of rational\/a-rational, logical\/a-logical) pervades the history of Western thought from the archaic era up to contemporary times. Perceived in different historical periods and in different cultural forms either as a conflict or as a vital coexistence, the reason\/no-reason pair was first theorized and legitimated as a sharp contrast in antiquity with the Pythagorean systoichiai, and at the dawn of the twentieth century it was successfully exemplified by Nietzsche through the opposition between Apollonian and Dionysian principles, which denotes respectively the harmonious, orderly, 'bright' side of the human soul, and the chaotic one, wild, instinctive, passionate, 'dark'. This volume is the outcome of the work of an international research group, which intended to cover some aspects of this dichotomy with the specific end to prove that the two sides of the human 'soul' don't contradict each other - in such a way that one excludes, ontologically and axiologically, the other - but they are rather closely interrelated and interdependent. Scholars with different expertise in the history of thought tackled diachronically some key moments of this story, from different angles and with different approaches, from ancient thought to modern neurosciences. The volume contains contributions of Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Institute of Philosophy, Adam Mickiewicz University), R. Loredana Cardullo (University of Catania), Francesco Coniglione (University of Catania), Santo Di Nuovo (University of Catania), Daniele Iozzia (University of Catania), Syliane Malinowski-Charles (Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec \u00e0 Trois Rivi\u00e8re), Concetto Martello (University of Catania), Alexandra Michalewski (Paris - Sorbonne, CNRS), Chiara Militello (University of Catania), Sebastian Moro Tornese (United Kingdom), Jean-Marc Narbonne (Laval Universit\u00e9, Canada), Anne Sheppard (Royal Holloway, University of London), Salvatore Vasta (University of Catania), Andrea Vella (University of Catania).","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5105,"pubplace":"Sankt Augustin","publisher":"Academia Verlag","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["John of Jandun on Philosophy, Religion, Pleasure, and Truth. Two Interpretations of Averroes\u2019 Introduction to the Commentary on Physics 3"]}
| Title | L'intelligence et la pensée. Grand commentaire du De anima, III. Traduction, introduction et notes par Alain de Libera |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 1998 |
| Publication Place | Paris |
| Publisher | Flammarion |
| Categories | Psychology, Commentary, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Averroes , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | Alain de Libera |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1464","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1464,"authors_free":[{"id":1671,"entry_id":1464,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":1672,"entry_id":1464,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":647,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Alain de Libera","free_first_name":"Alain de","free_last_name":"Libera","norm_person":{"id":647,"first_name":"Alain de","last_name":"Libera","full_name":"Alain de Libera","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/130219002","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/98388541","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd130219002.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alain de Libera"}}],"entry_title":"L'intelligence et la pens\u00e9e. Grand commentaire du De anima, III. Traduction, introduction et notes par Alain de Libera","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"L'intelligence et la pens\u00e9e. Grand commentaire du De anima, III. Traduction, introduction et notes par Alain de Libera"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"1998","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[{"id":68,"aw_title":"Long Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1464,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Flammarion","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["L'intelligence et la pens\u00e9e. Grand commentaire du De anima, III. Traduction, introduction et notes par Alain de Libera"]}
| Title | La recepción de la ética aristotélica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval |
| Translation | The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Endoxa |
| Volume | 48 |
| Pages | 15-46 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Nicomachean ethics, Tradition and Reception, Plato, Albert, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Andrés Martínez Lorca |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El pensamiento ético de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico filósofo islámico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristotélica sobre el tema, la Ética nicomáquea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo análisis de ese Comentario a través de los conceptos de eudaimonía o felicidad, philía o amistad y tò díkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y políticos apuntados por Aristóteles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso ético. Asimismo, señala la preocupación de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexión entre ética y política. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemonía la política.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiografía medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalusí como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepción de la Ética nicomáquea de Aristóteles, obra que penetró en los círculos filosóficos y también en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales teólogos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tomás de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al latín por un obispo, ayudó a su difusión en el mundo medieval y más tarde en el Renacimiento. The ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimonía or happiness, philía or friendship and tò díkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5565","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5565,"authors_free":[{"id":6459,"entry_id":5565,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez ","free_last_name":"Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world","main_title":{"title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval"},"abstract":"El pensamiento \u00e9tico de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico fil\u00f3sofo isl\u00e1mico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristot\u00e9lica sobre el tema, la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo an\u00e1lisis de ese Comentario a trav\u00e9s de los conceptos de eudaimon\u00eda o felicidad, phil\u00eda o amistad y t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y pol\u00edticos apuntados por Arist\u00f3teles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso \u00e9tico. Asimismo, se\u00f1ala la preocupaci\u00f3n de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexi\u00f3n entre \u00e9tica y pol\u00edtica. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemon\u00eda la pol\u00edtica.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiograf\u00eda medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalus\u00ed como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepci\u00f3n de la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea de Arist\u00f3teles, obra que penetr\u00f3 en los c\u00edrculos filos\u00f3ficos y tambi\u00e9n en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales te\u00f3logos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al lat\u00edn por un obispo, ayud\u00f3 a su difusi\u00f3n en el mundo medieval y m\u00e1s tarde en el Renacimiento.\r\n\r\nThe ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimon\u00eda or happiness, phil\u00eda or friendship and t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5944\/endoxa.48.2021 (refers to the whole volume)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":756,"full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5565,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Endoxa","volume":"48","issue":"","pages":"15-46"}},"sort":["La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval"]}
| Title | La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averroè alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | L'averroismo in età moderna (1400–1700) |
| Pages | 15–23 |
| Categories | Commentary, Metaphysics, Tradition and Reception, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Mauro Zonta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5285","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5285,"authors_free":[{"id":6104,"entry_id":5285,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averro\u00e8 alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averro\u00e8 alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5285,"section_of":2007,"pages":"15\u201323","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":2007,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":1811,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":null,"title":"L'averroismo in et\u00e0 moderna (1400\u20131700)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":1,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":2007,"pubplace":"Macerata","publisher":"Quodlibet Studio","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["La tradizione testuale del Commento medio di Averro\u00e8 alla Metafisica di Aristotele tra Quattrocento e Cinquecento"]}
| Title | Le Plaisir, le bonheur et l’acquisition des vertus |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2018 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science. Texts and Studies |
| Volume | 108 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Frédérique Woerther , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | Frédérique Woerther |
| This volume contains the first edition of the Latin version of the Middle Commentary of Averroes on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics Book X, the original arabic version being lost. It is accompanied by an annotated French translation. The volume also contains a full study of the manuscript tradition of the Latin text and sets outs the principles used in the edition, which takes into account, where necessary, the Hebrew version of the Commentary. Two further studies complete the volume: the first is devoted to the genre of “Middle Commentary” (talḫīṣ); the second considers how Averroes uses an analogy with medicine to place ethics at the heart of practical philosophy, and how, in a manner that is foreign to Aristotle, he conceives of ethics as a “science.” |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5180","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5180,"authors_free":[{"id":5966,"entry_id":5180,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":"","free_last_name":"","norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":5967,"entry_id":5180,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}},{"id":5968,"entry_id":5180,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"Le Plaisir, le bonheur et l\u2019acquisition des vertus","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Le Plaisir, le bonheur et l\u2019acquisition des vertus"},"abstract":"This volume contains the first edition of the Latin version of the Middle Commentary of Averroes on Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics Book X, the original arabic version being lost. It is accompanied by an annotated French translation. The volume also contains a full study of the manuscript tradition of the Latin text and sets outs the principles used in the edition, which takes into account, where necessary, the Hebrew version of the Commentary. Two further studies complete the volume: the first is devoted to the genre of \u201cMiddle Commentary\u201d (tal\u1e2b\u012b\u1e63); the second considers how Averroes uses an analogy with medicine to place ethics at the heart of practical philosophy, and how, in a manner that is foreign to Aristotle, he conceives of ethics as a \u201cscience.\u201d ","btype":1,"date":"2018","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/9789004381131","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5180,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":" Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science. Texts and Studies","volume":"108","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Le Plaisir, le bonheur et l\u2019acquisition des vertus"]}