| Title | ?Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tomás de Aquino intérprete de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 45–63 |
| Categories | Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Mariano Pérez Carrasco |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| ¿Cuál es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? ¿Qué es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemológico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filosóficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tomás de Aquino no sólo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filosófica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos capítulos centrales. Uno de esos capítulos es el así llamado ‘‘averroísmo latino’’, fuertemente criticado por Tomás en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este artículo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tomás no sólo procura refutar la epistemología de Averroes, sino que, además, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como características del ‘‘averroísmo’’. Más específicamente, el artículo llama la atención acerca del modo en que Tomás (mal)interpreta la teoría de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en términos de su propia teoría de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1791","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1791,"authors_free":[{"id":2066,"entry_id":1791,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1507,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","free_first_name":"Mariano","free_last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","norm_person":{"id":1507,"first_name":"Mariano","last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142907456","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/160133814","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco"}}],"entry_title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"},"abstract":"\u00bfCu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? \u00bfQu\u00e9 es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemol\u00f3gico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filos\u00f3ficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no s\u00f3lo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filos\u00f3fica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos cap\u00edtulos centrales. Uno de esos cap\u00edtulos es el as\u00ed llamado \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo latino\u2019\u2019, fuertemente criticado por Tom\u00e1s en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este art\u00edculo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tom\u00e1s no s\u00f3lo procura refutar la epistemolog\u00eda de Averroes, sino que, adem\u00e1s, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como caracter\u00edsticas del \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo\u2019\u2019. M\u00e1s espec\u00edficamente, el art\u00edculo llama la atenci\u00f3n acerca del modo en que Tom\u00e1s (mal)interpreta la teor\u00eda de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en t\u00e9rminos de su propia teor\u00eda de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento).","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5209\/rev_ASHF.2012.v29.n1.39454 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1507,"full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1791,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201363"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 89–102 |
| Categories | Ibn Bāǧǧa, Aquinas, Albert |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Albert’s De anima III, 3, chapters 6–11 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace’s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2015","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2015,"authors_free":[{"id":6121,"entry_id":2015,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier,","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"},"abstract":"In Albert\u2019s De anima III, 3, chapters 6\u201311 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace\u2019s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2015,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"89\u2013102"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Al-Miklātī, a Twelfth Century Aš’arite Reader of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 155–197 |
| Categories | Proceedings, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Yamina Adouhane , Yamina Adouhane |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The aim of this article is to present a new witness of Averroes' reception in the Muslim world, in the years that immediately followed his death. Indeed Abū al-Ḥağğāğ al-Miklātī (d. 1237) is an Ašʿarite theologian, who was born in Fez. He is the author of a Quintessence of the Intellects in Response to Philosophers on the Science of Principles in which he aims at refuting the Peripatetic philosophers in their own field, using their own weapons. This article will first attempt to draw the portrait of this atypical theologian. It will then focus on showing that al-Miklātī – although he never mentions his name – is a reader of Averroes and in particular, of his Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, of which he makes various and unexpected uses. A close look at these uses will enable us to better define the nature of al-Miklātī's work. More importantly, this article will try to prove that al-Miklātī provides us with a key passage of Averroes' lost treatise On the Prime Mover. At the heart of the Rushdian criticism of Avicenna's “metaphysical” proof, this passage should throw new light on Averroes' precise understanding of this proof. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1757","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1757,"authors_free":[{"id":2027,"entry_id":1757,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1489,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yamina Adouhane","free_first_name":"Yamina","free_last_name":"Adouhane","norm_person":{"id":1489,"first_name":"Yamina","last_name":"Adouhane","full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/458146284502615332481","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yamina Adouhane"}},{"id":2028,"entry_id":1757,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1489,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yamina Adouhane","free_first_name":"Yamina","free_last_name":"Adouhane","norm_person":{"id":1489,"first_name":"Yamina","last_name":"Adouhane","full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/458146284502615332481","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yamina Adouhane"}}],"entry_title":"Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes"},"abstract":"The aim of this article is to present a new witness of Averroes' reception in the Muslim world, in the years that immediately followed his death. Indeed Ab\u016b al-\u1e24a\u011f\u011f\u0101\u011f al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b (d. 1237) is an A\u0161\u02bfarite theologian, who was born in Fez. He is the author of a Quintessence of the Intellects in Response to Philosophers on the Science of Principles in which he aims at refuting the Peripatetic philosophers in their own field, using their own weapons. This article will first attempt to draw the portrait of this atypical theologian. It will then focus on showing that al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b \u2013 although he never mentions his name \u2013 is a reader of Averroes and in particular, of his Tah\u0101fut al-Tah\u0101fut, of which he makes various and unexpected uses. A close look at these uses will enable us to better define the nature of al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b's work. More importantly, this article will try to prove that al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b provides us with a key passage of Averroes' lost treatise On the Prime Mover. At the heart of the Rushdian criticism of Avicenna's \u201cmetaphysical\u201d proof, this passage should throw new light on Averroes' precise understanding of this proof.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S095742391200001X","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":45,"category_name":"Proceedings","link":"bib?categories[]=Proceedings"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1489,"full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","role":1},{"id":1489,"full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1757,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"22","issue":"2","pages":"155\u2013197"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Long Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Ishraq. Islamic Philosophy Yearbook |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 380–407 |
| Categories | Commentary, Aristotle, De anima |
| Author(s) | Averroes , Y. Eshots , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | N. V. Efremova |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1756","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1756,"authors_free":[{"id":2023,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":2024,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1488,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Y. Eshots","free_first_name":"Y.","free_last_name":"Eshots","norm_person":{"id":1488,"first_name":"Y.","last_name":"Eshots","full_name":"Y. Eshots","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/282454899","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Y. Eshots"}},{"id":2026,"entry_id":1756,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1487,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"N. V. Efremova","free_first_name":"N. V.","free_last_name":"Efremova","norm_person":{"id":1487,"first_name":"N. V.","last_name":"Efremova","full_name":"N. V. Efremova","short_ident":"NVEfr","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=N. V. Efremova"}}],"entry_title":"Long Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s De anima","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Long Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s De anima"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1},{"id":1488,"full_name":"Y. Eshots","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1756,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ishraq. Islamic Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"3","issue":null,"pages":"380\u2013407"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Al-Masāq |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 253–264 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Instead of dismissing traditional mythology and poetry as heresies, Greek philosophy introduced a methodology of understanding known as allegory. Philo of Alexandria (20 BC-50 AD) was one of the first to employ allegory for understanding religious scriptures whose writings survived in the Christian traditions. In the Arab world, the philosopher Ibn Rushd (520-595/1126-1198) initiated the same method of commentary with his demonstration of the essential harmony between philosophy properly understood and scripture properly interpreted. This essay posits that Greek philosophy laid down a common tool for understanding the scriptures that exist in the Christian and Muslim traditions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1762","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1762,"authors_free":[{"id":2033,"entry_id":1762,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1496,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","free_first_name":"Shuhaimi M.","free_last_name":"Bin Haji Ishak","norm_person":{"id":1496,"first_name":"Shuhaimi M.","last_name":"Bin Haji Ishak","full_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1038449014","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/305147204","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak"}}],"entry_title":"Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"Instead of dismissing traditional mythology and poetry as heresies, Greek philosophy introduced a methodology of understanding known as allegory. Philo of Alexandria (20 BC-50 AD) was one of the first to employ allegory for understanding religious scriptures whose writings survived in the Christian traditions. In the Arab world, the philosopher Ibn Rushd (520-595\/1126-1198) initiated the same method of commentary with his demonstration of the essential harmony between philosophy properly understood and scripture properly interpreted. This essay posits that Greek philosophy laid down a common tool for understanding the scriptures that exist in the Christian and Muslim traditions.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09503110.2012.727656","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1496,"full_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1762,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Mas\u0101q","volume":"24","issue":"3","pages":"253\u2013264"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Reflections on Ruth Glasner's Averroes' Physics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Aleph. Historical Studies in Science & Judaism |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 403–412 |
| Categories | Physics, Review |
| Author(s) | Steven Harvey |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Review of Ruth Glasner, Averroes’ Physics: A Turning Point in Medieval Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1704","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1704,"authors_free":[{"id":1968,"entry_id":1704,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":642,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steven Harvey","free_first_name":"Steven","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":642,"first_name":"Steven","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Steven Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051482674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97890242","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Steven Harvey"}}],"entry_title":"Reflections on Ruth Glasner's Averroes' Physics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Reflections on Ruth Glasner's Averroes' Physics"},"abstract":"Review of Ruth Glasner, Averroes\u2019 Physics: A Turning Point in Medieval Natural Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"}],"authors":[{"id":642,"full_name":"Steven Harvey","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1704,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Aleph. Historical Studies in Science & Judaism","volume":"12","issue":"2","pages":"403\u2013412"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Regards d’Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwaynî. Questions de méthodes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 199–216 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Mokdad Arfa Mensia |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This essay is concerned with the complex relationships between falsafa and kalām. As regards the history of the latter, it has been generally agreed that al-Juwaynī played a decisive role at a moment when Avicennism became intrusive. It is mainly in his al-ʿAqīda al-niẓāmiyya that al-Juwaynī initiated a doctrinal and methodic evolution of Ashʿarism. One necessarily invokes here Ibn Rushd, who, by exposing the dogmas in their literal manifestation in his al-Kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla fī ʿaqāʾid al-milla, actually sought to operate a systematic refutation of the Ashʿarites' theses. It should be noted, however, that, despite his critical distance, Ibn Rushd nonetheless remained attentive to al-Juwaynī's evolutionary study. In this contribution, some aspects of the major issues in kalām will be examined: the existence of God and the argument of takhṣīṣ (particularization), His unicity (waḥdāniyya) and the argument of mumānaʿa (mutual hindering), as well as human agency with the acknowledgement of man's capacity (qudra) and its role. Albeit limited in scope, the essay attempts to make a more profound evaluation of al-Juwaynī's role at a crucial moment of the history of kalām in its specific development during which the Great Masters have not always been faithful to the classical tenets of their school, but also in its relations with falsafa and its influence on al-Juwaynī, and then and mainly on his disciple al-Ghazālī's theological thought. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1789","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1789,"authors_free":[{"id":2063,"entry_id":1789,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1036,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","free_first_name":"Mokdad Arfa","free_last_name":"Mensia","norm_person":{"id":1036,"first_name":"Mokdad Arfa","last_name":"Mensia","full_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/187255466","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/3380832","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mokdad Arfa Mensia"}}],"entry_title":"Regards d\u2019Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwayn\u00ee. Questions de m\u00e9thodes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Regards d\u2019Ibn Rushd sur al-Juwayn\u00ee. Questions de m\u00e9thodes"},"abstract":"This essay is concerned with the complex relationships between falsafa and kal\u0101m. As regards the history of the latter, it has been generally agreed that al-Juwayn\u012b played a decisive role at a moment when Avicennism became intrusive. It is mainly in his al-\u02bfAq\u012bda al-ni\u1e93\u0101miyya that al-Juwayn\u012b initiated a doctrinal and methodic evolution of Ash\u02bfarism. One necessarily invokes here Ibn Rushd, who, by exposing the dogmas in their literal manifestation in his al-Kashf \u02bfan man\u0101hij al-adilla f\u012b \u02bfaq\u0101\u02beid al-milla, actually sought to operate a systematic refutation of the Ash\u02bfarites' theses. It should be noted, however, that, despite his critical distance, Ibn Rushd nonetheless remained attentive to al-Juwayn\u012b's evolutionary study. In this contribution, some aspects of the major issues in kal\u0101m will be examined: the existence of God and the argument of takh\u1e63\u012b\u1e63 (particularization), His unicity (wa\u1e25d\u0101niyya) and the argument of mum\u0101na\u02bfa (mutual hindering), as well as human agency with the acknowledgement of man's capacity (qudra) and its role. Albeit limited in scope, the essay attempts to make a more profound evaluation of al-Juwayn\u012b's role at a crucial moment of the history of kal\u0101m in its specific development during which the Great Masters have not always been faithful to the classical tenets of their school, but also in its relations with falsafa and its influence on al-Juwayn\u012b, and then and mainly on his disciple al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's theological thought.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0957423912000021","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1036,"full_name":"Mokdad Arfa Mensia","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1789,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"22","issue":"2","pages":"199\u2013216"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | La théorie averroïste des dimensions indéterminées dans le Traité sur la substance de la sphére céleste (Livre I, chapitre 2) de Walter Burley. Pour Averroès ou contre Thomas d'Aquin? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 26–45 |
| Categories | Cosmology |
| Author(s) | Alice Lamy |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| At the University of Paris in the XIV century, Walter Burley is an erudite commentator of the works of Averroes and felds a particular interest for his teaching on the quantification of matter (De Substantia orbis, I, 2). Although he tries to interpret literally the teachings of the Commentator on the indefinite dimensions in his own comment of this work, his successive definitions of corporeity betray the ontological instability of this metaphysical quantitative principle, which it is impossible to classify either in act or in power, and which it si difficult to identify as a form or as an accident. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1703","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1703,"authors_free":[{"id":1967,"entry_id":1703,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1462,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alice Lamy","free_first_name":"Alice","free_last_name":"Lamy","norm_person":{"id":1462,"first_name":"Alice","last_name":"Lamy","full_name":"Alice Lamy","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1031307095","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5262506","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alice Lamy"}}],"entry_title":"La th\u00e9orie averro\u00efste des dimensions ind\u00e9termin\u00e9es dans le Trait\u00e9 sur la substance de la sph\u00e9re c\u00e9leste (Livre I, chapitre 2) de Walter Burley. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La th\u00e9orie averro\u00efste des dimensions ind\u00e9termin\u00e9es dans le Trait\u00e9 sur la substance de la sph\u00e9re c\u00e9leste (Livre I, chapitre 2) de Walter Burley. Pour Averro\u00e8s ou contre Thomas d'Aquin?"},"abstract":"At the University of Paris in the XIV century, Walter Burley is an erudite commentator of the works of Averroes and felds a particular interest for his teaching on the quantification of matter (De Substantia orbis, I, 2). Although he tries to interpret literally the teachings of the Commentator on the indefinite dimensions in his own comment of this work, his successive definitions of corporeity betray the ontological instability of this metaphysical quantitative principle, which it is impossible to classify either in act or in power, and which it si difficult to identify as a form or as an accident.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5169\/seals-760553","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"}],"authors":[{"id":1462,"full_name":"Alice Lamy","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1703,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Freiburger Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und Theologie","volume":"59","issue":"1","pages":"26\u201345"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle’s Physica and Averroes’ Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Oriens |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 149–167 |
| Categories | Physics, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Horst Schmieja |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Sixty-two thirteenth and fourteenth-century Latin manuscripts of Averroes’ commentary of Aristotle’s Physics are currently known. Many of these manuscripts have a substantial gap in Book 8, stretching from about the middle of commentary 76 to the end of commentary 79. The Cathedral Library of Toledo holds a thirteenth-century manuscript which not only contains Book 8 in its entirety, but also two different Arabic-Latin translations of significant parts of textus and commentum 76. Analysis of these two versions allows important insights into the translator’s work. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1697","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1697,"authors_free":[{"id":1960,"entry_id":1697,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":917,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Horst Schmieja","free_first_name":"Horst","free_last_name":"Schmieja","norm_person":{"id":917,"first_name":"Horst","last_name":"Schmieja","full_name":"Horst Schmieja","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/109279034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/71959432","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Horst Schmieja"}}],"entry_title":"Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle\u2019s Physica and Averroes\u2019 Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Arabic-Latin Reception of Aristotle\u2019s Physica and Averroes\u2019 Commentarium magnum. Two Versions in a Manuscript from Toledo"},"abstract":"Sixty-two thirteenth and fourteenth-century Latin manuscripts of Averroes\u2019 commentary of Aristotle\u2019s Physics are currently known. Many of these manuscripts have a substantial gap in Book 8, stretching from about the middle of commentary 76 to the end of commentary 79. The Cathedral Library of Toledo holds a thirteenth-century manuscript which not only contains Book 8 in its entirety, but also two different Arabic-Latin translations of significant parts of textus and commentum 76. Analysis of these two versions allows important insights into the translator\u2019s work.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/187783712X634698","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":917,"full_name":"Horst Schmieja","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1697,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriens","volume":"40","issue":"1","pages":"149\u2013167"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Averroes – Ein Aufklärer im Mittelalter? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Philosophische Rundschau |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 78–91 |
| Categories | Influence, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Stefan Schick |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5197","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5197,"authors_free":[{"id":5988,"entry_id":5197,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Stefan Schick","free_first_name":"Stefan","free_last_name":"Schick","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes \u2013 Ein Aufkl\u00e4rer im Mittelalter?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes \u2013 Ein Aufkl\u00e4rer im Mittelalter?"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"German","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1628\/003181512800251571","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5197,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophische Rundschau","volume":"59","issue":"1","pages":"78\u201391"}},"sort":[2012]}
| Title | Averroismus vor Averroes?. Zu einer Theorie der doppelten Wahrheit im 10. Jahrhundert |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1995 |
| Journal | Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum |
| Volume | 32 |
| Pages | 33–39 |
| Categories | Averroism |
| Author(s) | Friedrich Niewöhner |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"356","_score":null,"_source":{"id":356,"authors_free":[{"id":495,"entry_id":356,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":629,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Friedrich Niew\u00f6hner","free_first_name":"Friedrich","free_last_name":"Niew\u00f6hner","norm_person":{"id":629,"first_name":"Friedrich","last_name":"Niew\u00f6hner","full_name":"Friedrich Niew\u00f6hner","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/121637980","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/64039885","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/sfzN1540-6.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Friedrich Niew\u00f6hner"}}],"entry_title":"Averroismus vor Averroes?. Zu einer Theorie der doppelten Wahrheit im 10. Jahrhundert","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroismus vor Averroes?. Zu einer Theorie der doppelten Wahrheit im 10. Jahrhundert"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":629,"full_name":"Friedrich Niew\u00f6hner","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":356,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum","volume":"32","issue":null,"pages":"33\u201339"}},"sort":["Averroismus vor Averroes?. Zu einer Theorie der doppelten Wahrheit im 10. Jahrhundert"]}
| Title | Averroistic Fourteenth Century Bolognese Texts in the MS BJ 742 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1988 |
| Journal | Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum |
| Volume | 29 |
| Pages | 9–48 |
| Categories | Averroism |
| Author(s) | Zdzislaw Kuksewicz |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"336","_score":null,"_source":{"id":336,"authors_free":[{"id":475,"entry_id":336,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":665,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Zdzislaw Kuksewicz","free_first_name":"Zdzislaw","free_last_name":"Kuksewicz","norm_person":{"id":665,"first_name":"Zdzislaw","last_name":"Kuksewicz","full_name":"Zdzislaw Kuksewicz","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1079031510","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/22156415","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Zdzislaw Kuksewicz"}}],"entry_title":"Averroistic Fourteenth Century Bolognese Texts in the MS BJ 742","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroistic Fourteenth Century Bolognese Texts in the MS BJ 742"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1988","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":665,"full_name":"Zdzislaw Kuksewicz","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":336,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediaevalia philosophica Polonorum","volume":"29","issue":null,"pages":"9\u201348"}},"sort":["Averroistic Fourteenth Century Bolognese Texts in the MS BJ 742"]}
| Title | Averroistic Trends in Jewish-Christian Polemics in the Late Middle Ages |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1980 |
| Journal | Speculum |
| Volume | 55 |
| Pages | 294–304 |
| Categories | Averroism, Jewish Averroism |
| Author(s) | Daniel J. Lasker |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"343","_score":null,"_source":{"id":343,"authors_free":[{"id":482,"entry_id":343,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":671,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Daniel J. Lasker","free_first_name":"Daniel J.","free_last_name":"Lasker","norm_person":{"id":671,"first_name":"Daniel J.","last_name":"Lasker","full_name":"Daniel J. Lasker","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1024555674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59212534","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Daniel J. Lasker"}}],"entry_title":"Averroistic Trends in Jewish-Christian Polemics in the Late Middle Ages","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroistic Trends in Jewish-Christian Polemics in the Late Middle Ages"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1980","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":8,"category_name":"Jewish Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Jewish Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":671,"full_name":"Daniel J. Lasker","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":343,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Speculum","volume":"55","issue":null,"pages":"294\u2013304"}},"sort":["Averroistic Trends in Jewish-Christian Polemics in the Late Middle Ages"]}
| Title | Averroè |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1949 |
| Journal | Enciclopedia Cattolica. Il libro Cattolico |
| Volume | 2 |
| Pages | 521–524 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Gerardo Bruni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1675","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1675,"authors_free":[{"id":1935,"entry_id":1675,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1450,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gerardo Bruni","free_first_name":"Gerardo","free_last_name":"Bruni","norm_person":{"id":1450,"first_name":"Gerardo","last_name":"Bruni","full_name":"Gerardo Bruni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118829815","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/115545875","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gerardo Bruni"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1949","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[],"authors":[{"id":1450,"full_name":"Gerardo Bruni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1675,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Enciclopedia Cattolica. Il libro Cattolico","volume":"2","issue":null,"pages":"521\u2013524"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8"]}
| Title | Averroè (1198–1998) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1999 |
| Journal | Rivista di storia della filosofia |
| Volume | 54 |
| Pages | 465–471 |
| Categories | Surveys |
| Author(s) | Massimo Campanini |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"974","_score":null,"_source":{"id":974,"authors_free":[{"id":1146,"entry_id":974,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":755,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Massimo Campanini","free_first_name":"Massimo","free_last_name":"Campanini","norm_person":{"id":755,"first_name":"Massimo","last_name":"Campanini","full_name":"Massimo Campanini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1116088959","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/36958023","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Massimo Campanini"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8 (1198\u20131998)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8 (1198\u20131998)"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1999","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[{"id":755,"full_name":"Massimo Campanini","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":974,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista di storia della filosofia","volume":"54","issue":null,"pages":"465\u2013471"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8 (1198\u20131998)"]}
| Title | Averroè e Giordano Bruno sulla religione: metamorfosi della credenza |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Journal | Bruniana & Campanelliana |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 395-409 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Averroism, Averroism |
| Author(s) | Massimo Campanini |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Although personally he had been a practicing Muslim, in the Western philosophical tradition Averroes has always had a reputation for being an unbeliever. Some aspects of Averroes’ thought, including the doctrine of the so-called ‘double truth’ and his noetic, could justify such a misinterpretation. Also Giordano Bruno can be labeled as an ‘averroistic’ unbeliever, but only because he viewed the historical religions as nomoi, ‘fake’ laws with the purpose of ruling the masses. The metamorphosis of Averroes from belief to disbelief, even through Bruno, has prepared the ground for the libertine tradition of the seventeenth and later centuries. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26575319 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5574","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5574,"authors_free":[{"id":6468,"entry_id":5574,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":755,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Massimo Campanini","free_first_name":"Massimo ","free_last_name":"Campanini","norm_person":{"id":755,"first_name":"Massimo","last_name":"Campanini","full_name":"Massimo Campanini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1116088959","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/36958023","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Massimo Campanini"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8 e Giordano Bruno sulla religione: metamorfosi della credenza","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8 e Giordano Bruno sulla religione: metamorfosi della credenza"},"abstract":"Although personally he had been a practicing Muslim, in the Western philosophical tradition Averroes has always had a reputation for being an unbeliever. Some aspects of Averroes\u2019 thought, including the doctrine of the so-called \u2018double truth\u2019 and his noetic, could justify such a misinterpretation. Also Giordano Bruno can be labeled as an \u2018averroistic\u2019 unbeliever, but only because he viewed the historical religions as nomoi, \u2018fake\u2019 laws with the purpose of ruling the masses. The metamorphosis of Averroes from belief to disbelief, even through Bruno, has prepared the ground for the libertine tradition of the seventeenth and later centuries.","btype":3,"date":"","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26575319","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":755,"full_name":"Massimo Campanini","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5574,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bruniana & Campanelliana","volume":"22","issue":"2","pages":"395-409"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8 e Giordano Bruno sulla religione: metamorfosi della credenza"]}
| Title | Averroè, una traduzione ininterrotta |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Doctor Virtualis |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | Per Massimo Campanini |
| Pages | 107-129 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Modern Interpretations and Adaptations, Modern Readings |
| Author(s) | Augusto Illuminati |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| La mia collaborazione con Massimo Campanini si è sviluppata su comuni interessi per i classici del pensiero islamico ma con competenze assai diverse, essendo io più orientato a studiare gli effetti e gli sviluppi che essi produssero sul pensiero occidentale medievale e moderno attraverso una pratica di traduzioni spesso creative per imprecisione – l’inverso dell’operazione che essi stessi avevano fatto rispetto a Platone e Aristotele. Averroè-Ibn Rushd è già un bell’esempio di deformazione del nome, ma proprio la formazione della sua opera e i modi in cui è stata trasmessa al mondo ebraico e cristiano sono singolari testimonianze degli esiti ambigui del processo traduttivo. Cerchiamo infatti di mostrare come la lettura del De substantia orbis abbia stimolato sia nel Medioevo che nel Rinascimento non solo il rifiuto del creazionismo ma anche posizioni panteistiche, mentre la famosa tesi dell’intelletto materiale unico contenuta nel Commentarium Magnum al De anima aristotelico ha stimolato molteplici varianti del monopsichismo, da Spinoza a Marx e alla più recente letteratura post-strutturalista. My collaboration with Massimo Campanini developed around our common interests in the classics of Islamic thought, but with very different approaches, since I am more oriented towards studying the effects and developments they produced on medieval and modern Western thought through a practice of translation that was often creative in terms of inaccuracy – so the opposite of what had been done with respect to Plato and Aristotle. The same Averroes-Ibn Rushd is a fine example of name distortion, and the very formation of his work and the ways in which it was transmitted to the Jewish and Christian world are singular testimonies to the ambiguous outcomes of this translation process. I try to show how the reading of De substantia orbis in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance stimulated not only the rejection of creationism but also pantheistic beliefs, while the famous thesis on the material intellect exposed in the Commentarium Magnum to Aristotle’s De anima stimulated many variants of monopsychism, from Spinoza to Marx and the more recent post-structuralist literature. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5564","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5564,"authors_free":[{"id":6458,"entry_id":5564,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":649,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Augusto Illuminati","free_first_name":"Augusto ","free_last_name":"Illuminati","norm_person":{"id":649,"first_name":"Augusto","last_name":"Illuminati","full_name":"Augusto Illuminati","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111652483X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/93448260","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Augusto Illuminati"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8, una traduzione ininterrotta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8, una traduzione ininterrotta"},"abstract":"La mia collaborazione con Massimo Campanini si \u00e8 sviluppata su comuni interessi per i classici del pensiero islamico ma con competenze assai diverse, essendo io pi\u00f9 orientato a studiare gli effetti e gli sviluppi che essi produssero sul pensiero occidentale medievale e moderno attraverso una pratica di traduzioni spesso creative per imprecisione \u2013 l\u2019inverso dell\u2019operazione che essi stessi avevano fatto rispetto a Platone e Aristotele.\r\nAverro\u00e8-Ibn Rushd \u00e8 gi\u00e0 un bell\u2019esempio di deformazione del nome, ma proprio la formazione della sua opera e i modi in cui \u00e8 stata trasmessa al mondo ebraico e cristiano sono singolari testimonianze degli esiti ambigui del processo traduttivo. Cerchiamo infatti di mostrare come la lettura del De substantia orbis abbia stimolato sia nel Medioevo che nel Rinascimento non solo il rifiuto del creazionismo ma anche posizioni panteistiche, mentre la famosa tesi dell\u2019intelletto materiale unico contenuta nel Commentarium Magnum al De anima aristotelico ha stimolato molteplici varianti del monopsichismo, da Spinoza a Marx e alla pi\u00f9 recente letteratura post-strutturalista.\r\n\r\nMy collaboration with Massimo Campanini developed around our common interests in the classics of Islamic thought, but with very different approaches, since I am more oriented towards studying the effects and developments they produced on medieval and modern Western thought through a practice of translation that was often creative in terms of inaccuracy \u2013 so the opposite of what had been done with respect to Plato and Aristotle.\r\nThe same Averroes-Ibn Rushd is a fine example of name distortion, and the very formation of his work and the ways in which it was transmitted to the Jewish and Christian world are singular testimonies to the ambiguous outcomes of this translation process. I try to show how the reading of De substantia orbis in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance stimulated not only the rejection of creationism but also pantheistic beliefs, while the famous thesis on the material intellect exposed in the Commentarium Magnum to Aristotle\u2019s De anima stimulated many variants of monopsychism, from Spinoza to Marx and the more recent post-structuralist literature.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.54103\/2035-7362\/17830","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":52,"category_name":"Modern Interpretations and Adaptations","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Interpretations and Adaptations"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"}],"authors":[{"id":649,"full_name":"Augusto Illuminati","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5564,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Doctor Virtualis","volume":"17","issue":"Per Massimo Campanini","pages":"107-129"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8, una traduzione ininterrotta"]}
| Title | Averroè. filosofia e religione |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1982 |
| Journal | Il Contributo |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 21–33 |
| Categories | Theology |
| Author(s) | Alessandro Bausani |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1134","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1134,"authors_free":[{"id":1313,"entry_id":1134,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1139,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Alessandro Bausani","free_first_name":"Alessandro","free_last_name":"Bausani","norm_person":{"id":1139,"first_name":"Alessandro","last_name":"Bausani","full_name":"Alessandro Bausani","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119058413","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54269729","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Alessandro Bausani"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8. filosofia e religione","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8. filosofia e religione"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1982","language":"Italian","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1139,"full_name":"Alessandro Bausani","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1134,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Il Contributo","volume":"6","issue":"4","pages":"21\u201333"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8. filosofia e religione"]}
| Title | Averroès (Ibn Rushd) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1998 |
| Journal | Etudes de Philosophie Médiévale |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Categories | Surveys |
| Author(s) | ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Badawī |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1287","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1287,"authors_free":[{"id":1475,"entry_id":1287,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ra\u1e25m\u0101n Badaw\u012b","free_first_name":"\u02bfAbd al-Ra\u1e25m\u0101n","free_last_name":"Badaw\u012b","norm_person":{"id":1,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Abd al-Rahman Badawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/124994377","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61541234","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abd al-Rahman Badawi"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s (Ibn Rushd)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s (Ibn Rushd)"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[{"id":1,"full_name":"Abd al-Rahman Badawi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1287,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Etudes de Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"60","issue":"3","pages":null}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s (Ibn Rushd)"]}
| Title | Averroès a-t-il cité le talmud? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1949 |
| Journal | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age |
| Volume | 17 |
| Pages | 267-270 |
| Categories | Influence |
| Author(s) | Georges Vajda |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44403024 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5619","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5619,"authors_free":[{"id":6522,"entry_id":5619,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1737,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Georges Vajda","free_first_name":"Georges ","free_last_name":"Vajda","norm_person":{"id":1737,"first_name":"Georges","last_name":"Vajda","full_name":"Georges Vajda","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/119038889","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Georges Vajda"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il cit\u00e9 le talmud?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s a-t-il cit\u00e9 le talmud?"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1949","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44403024","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[{"id":1737,"full_name":"Georges Vajda","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5619,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litt\u00e9raire du Moyen Age","volume":"17","issue":"","pages":"267-270"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s a-t-il cit\u00e9 le talmud?"]}