| Title | Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: “En Orient, après Averroès … ” Revisited |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Intellectual history of the Islamicate world |
| Pages | 1-29 |
| Categories | Transmission, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Tracing the possible ways in which the thought of Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595/1198) was transmitted within Muslim contexts can be such a “frustrating” and “depressing” task that it may have contributed to the near absence of his name in the lists of influential philosophers of Islam in the eastern part of the Islamic world. This article, through the consultation of original texts and manuscripts sets out to throw some light on this seeming absence. It offers a revision of Henry Corbin’s famous assertion about Ibn Rushd’s fate in the East by addressing the various receptions of Ibn Rushd’s texts in North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, examining available manuscript catalogs of Ibn Rushd’s writings in Iran, and analyzing an important work by ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Lāhījī (d. 1072/1661–1662), one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5797","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5797,"authors_free":[{"id":6718,"entry_id":5797,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited"},"abstract":"Tracing the possible ways in which the thought of Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595\/1198) was transmitted within Muslim contexts can be such a \u201cfrustrating\u201d and \u201cdepressing\u201d task that it may have contributed to the near absence of his name in the lists of influential philosophers of Islam in the eastern part of the Islamic world. This article, through the consultation of original texts and manuscripts sets out to throw some light on this seeming absence. It offers a revision of Henry Corbin\u2019s famous assertion about Ibn Rushd\u2019s fate in the East by addressing the various receptions of Ibn Rushd\u2019s texts in North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, examining available manuscript catalogs of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings in Iran, and analyzing an important work by \u02bfAbd al-Razz\u0101q al-L\u0101h\u012bj\u012b (d. 1072\/1661\u20131662), one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1163\/2212943x-12340014","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5797,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Intellectual history of the Islamicate world","volume":"","issue":"","pages":"1-29"}},"sort":[2023]}
| Title | هل كتب ابن رشد شق بعنوانة “الضميمة“؟ ملا حظات نقدية حول غموض عمّر أكثر من قرن و نصف |
| Translation | Hat Ibn Rusd ein Werk mit dem Titel "Damīna" geschrieben? Kritische Anmerkungen um ein Geheimnis, das mehr als ein und ein halbes Jahrhundert dauert |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Sciences in Islamic Contexts |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Transmission |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this study, I examine the “identities” that a short work by the Andalusian philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595/1198), in which he deals with the question of “Does God know particulars?” has accumulated throughout its history. This work, which is usually published as an appendix to the Faṣl almaqāl (Decisive Treatises), is known in modern times under several names, including an Appendix on Divine Knowledge, or the Appendix or Dhayl to the Faṣl al-Maqal, or simply Ḍamīma or the Epistle Dedicatory entitled the Ḍamīma. This makes one wonder: did Ibn Rushd really write a work with this title? In order to answer this straightforward question and to identify the origin of the problem, I tried to return to the indexes, catalogs, historical and biographical works in which data of this work appeared, as well as to its unique manuscript (Escorial: 632). This survey helped us to clarify the forms of ambiguity that surrounded its title, since its first publication in the middle of the nineteenth century until today. My aim is to show that this work, unlike most of Ibn Rushd's works, is not supposed to have a specific title, as it was an answer to a question put to Ibn Rushd; which means that what has been mentioned in the index of Ibn Rushd's works (Escorial: 884) remains most relevant and closest to the identity of this short text. |
| Online Access | https://philosmus.org/archives/3088 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5459","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5459,"authors_free":[{"id":6323,"entry_id":5459,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad ","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"\u0647\u0644 \u0643\u062a\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0634\u0642 \u0628\u0639\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0646\u0629 \u201c\u0627\u0644\u0636\u0645\u064a\u0645\u0629\u201c\u061f \u0645\u0644\u0627 \u062d\u0638\u0627\u062a \u0646\u0642\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u063a\u0645\u0648\u0636 \u0639\u0645\u0651\u0631 \u0623\u0643\u062b\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0642\u0631\u0646 \u0648 \u0646\u0635\u0641","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Hat Ibn Rusd ein Werk mit dem Titel \"Dam\u012bna\" geschrieben? Kritische Anmerkungen um ein Geheimnis, das mehr als ein und ein halbes Jahrhundert dauert","main_title":{"title":"\u0647\u0644 \u0643\u062a\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0634\u0642 \u0628\u0639\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0646\u0629 \u201c\u0627\u0644\u0636\u0645\u064a\u0645\u0629\u201c\u061f \u0645\u0644\u0627 \u062d\u0638\u0627\u062a \u0646\u0642\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u063a\u0645\u0648\u0636 \u0639\u0645\u0651\u0631 \u0623\u0643\u062b\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0642\u0631\u0646 \u0648 \u0646\u0635\u0641"},"abstract":" In this study, I examine the \u201cidentities\u201d that a short work by the Andalusian philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595\/1198), in which he deals with the question of \u201cDoes God know particulars?\u201d has accumulated throughout its history. This work, which is usually published as an appendix to the Fa\u1e63l al\u0002maq\u0101l (Decisive Treatises), is known in modern times under several names, including an Appendix on Divine Knowledge, or the Appendix or Dhayl to the Fa\u1e63l al-Maqal, or simply \u1e0cam\u012bma or the Epistle Dedicatory entitled the \u1e0cam\u012bma. This makes one wonder: did Ibn Rushd really write a work with this title? In order to answer this straightforward question and to identify the origin of the problem, I tried to return \r\nto the indexes, catalogs, historical and biographical works in which data of this work appeared, as well as to its unique manuscript (Escorial: 632). This survey helped us to clarify the forms of ambiguity that surrounded its title, since its first publication in the middle of the nineteenth century until today. My aim is to show that this work, unlike most of Ibn Rushd's works, is not supposed to have a specific title, as it was an answer to a question put to Ibn Rushd; which means that what has been mentioned in the index of Ibn Rushd's works (Escorial: 884) remains most relevant and closest to the identity of this short text.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Arabic","online_url":"https:\/\/philosmus.org\/archives\/3088","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5459,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy and Sciences in Islamic Contexts","volume":"","issue":"","pages":""}},"sort":[2021]}
| Title | Three Masters and One Disciple: Ibn Tumlûs’s Critical Incorporation of al-Fârâbî, al-Ghazâlî, and Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Published in | Schüler und Meister |
| Pages | 537–556 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, al-Ġazālī, Transmission, Logic, Law, Medicine |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5215","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5215,"authors_free":[{"id":6017,"entry_id":5215,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"Three Masters and One Disciple: Ibn Tuml\u00fbs\u2019s Critical Incorporation of al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee, and Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Three Masters and One Disciple: Ibn Tuml\u00fbs\u2019s Critical Incorporation of al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee, and Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783110461770-027","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5215,"section_of":5214,"pages":"537\u2013556","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5214,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Sch\u00fcler und Meister","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2016","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Practices and techniques of imparting competency and knowledge are always essential for any mediation- or transfer process. Based on the distinctive master-disciple relationship, this volume examines individual ways of life, social contexts and institutional requirements as well as discursive practices and epistemological implications of this key relationship bequeathing culturally conveyed proficiencies and culturally encoded knowledge.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783110461770","book":{"id":5214,"pubplace":"Berlin, Boston","publisher":"De Gruyter","series":"Miscellanea Mediaevalia","volume":"39","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2016]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: “En Orient, après Averroès … ” Revisited |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Intellectual history of the Islamicate world |
| Pages | 1-29 |
| Categories | Transmission, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Tracing the possible ways in which the thought of Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595/1198) was transmitted within Muslim contexts can be such a “frustrating” and “depressing” task that it may have contributed to the near absence of his name in the lists of influential philosophers of Islam in the eastern part of the Islamic world. This article, through the consultation of original texts and manuscripts sets out to throw some light on this seeming absence. It offers a revision of Henry Corbin’s famous assertion about Ibn Rushd’s fate in the East by addressing the various receptions of Ibn Rushd’s texts in North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, examining available manuscript catalogs of Ibn Rushd’s writings in Iran, and analyzing an important work by ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Lāhījī (d. 1072/1661–1662), one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5797","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5797,"authors_free":[{"id":6718,"entry_id":5797,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited"},"abstract":"Tracing the possible ways in which the thought of Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595\/1198) was transmitted within Muslim contexts can be such a \u201cfrustrating\u201d and \u201cdepressing\u201d task that it may have contributed to the near absence of his name in the lists of influential philosophers of Islam in the eastern part of the Islamic world. This article, through the consultation of original texts and manuscripts sets out to throw some light on this seeming absence. It offers a revision of Henry Corbin\u2019s famous assertion about Ibn Rushd\u2019s fate in the East by addressing the various receptions of Ibn Rushd\u2019s texts in North Africa, Egypt, and the Levant, examining available manuscript catalogs of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings in Iran, and analyzing an important work by \u02bfAbd al-Razz\u0101q al-L\u0101h\u012bj\u012b (d. 1072\/1661\u20131662), one of the most famous philosophers of the 17th century.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1163\/2212943x-12340014","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5797,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Intellectual history of the Islamicate world","volume":"","issue":"","pages":"1-29"}},"sort":[" Ibn Rushd in the Safavid Iran: \u201cEn Orient, apr\u00e8s Averro\u00e8s \u2026 \u201d Revisited"]}
| Title | Three Masters and One Disciple: Ibn Tumlûs’s Critical Incorporation of al-Fârâbî, al-Ghazâlî, and Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Published in | Schüler und Meister |
| Pages | 537–556 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, al-Ġazālī, Transmission, Logic, Law, Medicine |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5215","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5215,"authors_free":[{"id":6017,"entry_id":5215,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"Three Masters and One Disciple: Ibn Tuml\u00fbs\u2019s Critical Incorporation of al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee, and Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Three Masters and One Disciple: Ibn Tuml\u00fbs\u2019s Critical Incorporation of al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee, and Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783110461770-027","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5215,"section_of":5214,"pages":"537\u2013556","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5214,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Sch\u00fcler und Meister","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2016","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Practices and techniques of imparting competency and knowledge are always essential for any mediation- or transfer process. Based on the distinctive master-disciple relationship, this volume examines individual ways of life, social contexts and institutional requirements as well as discursive practices and epistemological implications of this key relationship bequeathing culturally conveyed proficiencies and culturally encoded knowledge.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783110461770","book":{"id":5214,"pubplace":"Berlin, Boston","publisher":"De Gruyter","series":"Miscellanea Mediaevalia","volume":"39","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Three Masters and One Disciple: Ibn Tuml\u00fbs\u2019s Critical Incorporation of al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee, and Ibn Rushd"]}
| Title | هل كتب ابن رشد شق بعنوانة “الضميمة“؟ ملا حظات نقدية حول غموض عمّر أكثر من قرن و نصف |
| Translation | Hat Ibn Rusd ein Werk mit dem Titel "Damīna" geschrieben? Kritische Anmerkungen um ein Geheimnis, das mehr als ein und ein halbes Jahrhundert dauert |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Philosophy and Sciences in Islamic Contexts |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Transmission |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this study, I examine the “identities” that a short work by the Andalusian philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595/1198), in which he deals with the question of “Does God know particulars?” has accumulated throughout its history. This work, which is usually published as an appendix to the Faṣl almaqāl (Decisive Treatises), is known in modern times under several names, including an Appendix on Divine Knowledge, or the Appendix or Dhayl to the Faṣl al-Maqal, or simply Ḍamīma or the Epistle Dedicatory entitled the Ḍamīma. This makes one wonder: did Ibn Rushd really write a work with this title? In order to answer this straightforward question and to identify the origin of the problem, I tried to return to the indexes, catalogs, historical and biographical works in which data of this work appeared, as well as to its unique manuscript (Escorial: 632). This survey helped us to clarify the forms of ambiguity that surrounded its title, since its first publication in the middle of the nineteenth century until today. My aim is to show that this work, unlike most of Ibn Rushd's works, is not supposed to have a specific title, as it was an answer to a question put to Ibn Rushd; which means that what has been mentioned in the index of Ibn Rushd's works (Escorial: 884) remains most relevant and closest to the identity of this short text. |
| Online Access | https://philosmus.org/archives/3088 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5459","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5459,"authors_free":[{"id":6323,"entry_id":5459,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad ","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204161321","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"\u0647\u0644 \u0643\u062a\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0634\u0642 \u0628\u0639\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0646\u0629 \u201c\u0627\u0644\u0636\u0645\u064a\u0645\u0629\u201c\u061f \u0645\u0644\u0627 \u062d\u0638\u0627\u062a \u0646\u0642\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u063a\u0645\u0648\u0636 \u0639\u0645\u0651\u0631 \u0623\u0643\u062b\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0642\u0631\u0646 \u0648 \u0646\u0635\u0641","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Hat Ibn Rusd ein Werk mit dem Titel \"Dam\u012bna\" geschrieben? Kritische Anmerkungen um ein Geheimnis, das mehr als ein und ein halbes Jahrhundert dauert","main_title":{"title":"\u0647\u0644 \u0643\u062a\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0634\u0642 \u0628\u0639\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0646\u0629 \u201c\u0627\u0644\u0636\u0645\u064a\u0645\u0629\u201c\u061f \u0645\u0644\u0627 \u062d\u0638\u0627\u062a \u0646\u0642\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u063a\u0645\u0648\u0636 \u0639\u0645\u0651\u0631 \u0623\u0643\u062b\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0642\u0631\u0646 \u0648 \u0646\u0635\u0641"},"abstract":" In this study, I examine the \u201cidentities\u201d that a short work by the Andalusian philosopher Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 595\/1198), in which he deals with the question of \u201cDoes God know particulars?\u201d has accumulated throughout its history. This work, which is usually published as an appendix to the Fa\u1e63l al\u0002maq\u0101l (Decisive Treatises), is known in modern times under several names, including an Appendix on Divine Knowledge, or the Appendix or Dhayl to the Fa\u1e63l al-Maqal, or simply \u1e0cam\u012bma or the Epistle Dedicatory entitled the \u1e0cam\u012bma. This makes one wonder: did Ibn Rushd really write a work with this title? In order to answer this straightforward question and to identify the origin of the problem, I tried to return \r\nto the indexes, catalogs, historical and biographical works in which data of this work appeared, as well as to its unique manuscript (Escorial: 632). This survey helped us to clarify the forms of ambiguity that surrounded its title, since its first publication in the middle of the nineteenth century until today. My aim is to show that this work, unlike most of Ibn Rushd's works, is not supposed to have a specific title, as it was an answer to a question put to Ibn Rushd; which means that what has been mentioned in the index of Ibn Rushd's works (Escorial: 884) remains most relevant and closest to the identity of this short text.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Arabic","online_url":"https:\/\/philosmus.org\/archives\/3088","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5459,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy and Sciences in Islamic Contexts","volume":"","issue":"","pages":""}},"sort":["\u0647\u0644 \u0643\u062a\u0628 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0634\u0642 \u0628\u0639\u0646\u0648\u0627\u0646\u0629 \u201c\u0627\u0644\u0636\u0645\u064a\u0645\u0629\u201c\u061f \u0645\u0644\u0627 \u062d\u0638\u0627\u062a \u0646\u0642\u062f\u064a\u0629 \u062d\u0648\u0644 \u063a\u0645\u0648\u0636 \u0639\u0645\u0651\u0631 \u0623\u0643\u062b\u0631 \u0645\u0646 \u0642\u0631\u0646 \u0648 \u0646\u0635\u0641"]}