{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5796","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5796,"authors_free":[{"id":6717,"entry_id":5796,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elka Anakotta","free_first_name":"Elka","free_last_name":"Anakotta","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?"},"abstract":"Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.32996\/ijcrs.2023.3.2.7","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5796,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"51-58"}},"sort":[2023]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5565","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5565,"authors_free":[{"id":6459,"entry_id":5565,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez ","free_last_name":"Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"The reception of the Aristotelian Ethics in Averroes and its influence on trhe medieval latin world","main_title":{"title":"La recepci\u00f3n de la \u00e9tica aristot\u00e9lica en Averroes y su impacto en el mundo latino medieval"},"abstract":"El pensamiento \u00e9tico de Averroes apenas ha sido estudiado y ello a pesar de que es el nico fil\u00f3sofo isl\u00e1mico medieval del que se conserva un Comentario a la principal obra ristot\u00e9lica sobre el tema, la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea. El eje del presente trabajo es precisamente un nuevo an\u00e1lisis de ese Comentario a trav\u00e9s de los conceptos de eudaimon\u00eda o felicidad, phil\u00eda o amistad y t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion o justicia.Averroes subraya los aspectos sociales y pol\u00edticos apuntados por Arist\u00f3teles llegando a considerar el gobierno de los estados uno de los objetivos de su discurso \u00e9tico. Asimismo, se\u00f1ala la preocupaci\u00f3n de los legisladores por buscar la concordia civil que es considerada el mayor bien en las comunidades. Hay, pues, una conexi\u00f3n entre \u00e9tica y pol\u00edtica. Tiene, sin embargo, la hegemon\u00eda la pol\u00edtica.Finalmente se considera este aspecto desatendido hasta ahora en la historiograf\u00eda medieval: fue gracias al pensador andalus\u00ed como se produjo en el Occidente latino la recepci\u00f3n de la \u00c9tica nicom\u00e1quea de Arist\u00f3teles, obra que penetr\u00f3 en los c\u00edrculos filos\u00f3ficos y tambi\u00e9n en la cultura bajomedieval. La favorable acogida de los dos rincipales te\u00f3logos cristianos de la Edad Media, Alberto Magno y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino, al Comentario de Averroes, traducido al lat\u00edn por un obispo, ayud\u00f3 a su difusi\u00f3n en el mundo medieval y m\u00e1s tarde en el Renacimiento.\r\n\r\nThe ethical thought of Averroes has hardly been studied, and this despite the fact that he is the only medieval islamic philosopher whose Commentary on the main Aristotelian work on the subject, the Nicomachean Ethics, is preserved. The axis of this paper is precisely a new analysis of this Commentary through the concepts of eudaimon\u00eda or happiness, phil\u00eda or friendship and t\u00f2 d\u00edkaion or justice.Averroes underlines the social and political aspects pointed out by Aristotle, considering the government of the states one of the purposes of his ethical discourse. Likewise, he asserts the concern of legislators to seek civil harmony, which is considered the highest good in the communities. There is, consequently, a connection between ethics and politics. However, politics has the hegemony.Finally, is considered this neglected aspect so far in medieval historiography: it was thanks to the Andalusian thinker that was produced in the Latin West the reception of Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics, a work that entered philosophical circles and also late medieval culture. The favorable reception of the two main Christian theologians of the Middle Ages, Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, to the Commentary of Averroes, translated into Latin by a bishop, contributed to its spreading in the medieval world and later the Renaissance.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5944\/endoxa.48.2021 (refers to the whole volume)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":756,"full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5565,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Endoxa","volume":"48","issue":"","pages":"15-46"}},"sort":[2021]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5572","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5572,"authors_free":[{"id":6466,"entry_id":5572,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shazia Jagot","free_first_name":"Shazia","free_last_name":"Jagot","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas"},"abstract":"This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto\u2019s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365\u201369), explored alongside Bonaiuto\u2019s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi\u2019s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323\u201330), and Dante\u2019s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto\u2019s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi\u2019s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470\u201375). I argue that Memmi\u2019s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi\u2019s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto\u2019s Triumph is considered alongside Dante\u2019s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13130\/interfaces-06-02","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5572,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Interfaces, A Journal of Medieval European Literatures","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"7-32"}},"sort":[2019]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5302","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5302,"authors_free":[{"id":6128,"entry_id":5302,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Siger de Brabant et la notion d\u2019operans intrinsecum: un coup de ma\u00eetre?"},"abstract":"The present article pertains to the notion of operans intrinsecum that Siger of Brabant, in response to Thomas Aquinas, places at the heart of his De anima intellectiva in order to reconsider the intellect\u2019s relationship to the body. Drawing upon the model of celestial auto-motricity, the author aims to show two things. First, Siger finds in the Aquinate the elements for his own solution (without simply transferring the thomasian position). Second, he does so pertinently by recovering in Thomas Aquinas one of the muted but decisive sources for his cosmology: Averroes. Far from being a miserable escape hence decried, or even a first step toward Thomas\u2019 noetic, the \u201cintrinsic operant\u201d is the subtle and sound concept of a master capably enriching his contested exegesis of the De anima with averroist physics.","btype":3,"date":"2013","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.971.0003 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5302,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences philosophiques et th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"97","issue":"1","pages":"3\u201336"}},"sort":[2013]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1791","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1791,"authors_free":[{"id":2066,"entry_id":1791,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1507,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","free_first_name":"Mariano","free_last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","norm_person":{"id":1507,"first_name":"Mariano","last_name":"P\u00e9rez Carrasco","full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142907456","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/160133814","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco"}}],"entry_title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"?Cu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? Tom\u00e1s de Aquino int\u00e9rprete de Averroes"},"abstract":"\u00bfCu\u00e1l es el objeto de nuestro conocimiento? \u00bfQu\u00e9 es lo que de hecho conocemos? Este problema epistemol\u00f3gico fue uno de los ejes de las discusiones filos\u00f3ficas suscitadas dentro del aristotelismo del siglo XIII, y Tom\u00e1s de Aquino no s\u00f3lo fue uno de los principales protagonistas de esa querelle filos\u00f3fica, sino que ha escrito, incluso, alguno de esos cap\u00edtulos centrales. Uno de esos cap\u00edtulos es el as\u00ed llamado \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo latino\u2019\u2019, fuertemente criticado por Tom\u00e1s en varias obras, especialmente en el De unitate intellectus contra averroistas. Este art\u00edculo examina algunos de los argumentos mediante los cuales Tom\u00e1s no s\u00f3lo procura refutar la epistemolog\u00eda de Averroes, sino que, adem\u00e1s, postula y desarrolla algunas tesis luego consideradas como caracter\u00edsticas del \u2018\u2018averro\u00edsmo\u2019\u2019. M\u00e1s espec\u00edficamente, el art\u00edculo llama la atenci\u00f3n acerca del modo en que Tom\u00e1s (mal)interpreta la teor\u00eda de Averroes del intellectum speculativum (objeto del conocimiento) en t\u00e9rminos de su propia teor\u00eda de la species intelligibilis (medio o instrumento del conocimiento).","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5209\/rev_ASHF.2012.v29.n1.39454 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1507,"full_name":"Mariano P\u00e9rez Carrasco","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1791,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"29","issue":"1","pages":"45\u201363"}},"sort":[2012]}